sounds like youre hitting the nail on the head berry with both of them working together they werent giving her attorney any time to think and respond dave decided to go for the throat but your big problem is that we have a conversation recorded with knowledge and consent implicating your client for a contract hit a contract to kill charles loften but what really ties it up is that the testimony is from the person who was contracted to carry out the hit on loften we have your client dead to rights on this one with his testimony and your unintentional implication of your client i believe we have all we need dave stopped at this point .