human
Question: A car driven by Dan entered land owned by and in the possession of Peter, without Peter's permission. Which, if any, of the following allegations, without additional facts, would provide a sufficient basis for a claim by Peter against Dan? I. Dan intentionally drove his car onto Peter's land. II. Dan negligently drove his car onto Peter's land. III. Dan's car damaged Peter's land.

Choices:
A) I only.
B) III only.
C) I, II, or III.
D) Neither I, nor II, nor III.
gpt
The correct answer is 0: I only..