Against Hickelism
I do wonder if there will ever be a reevaluation and integration of the Soviet Union in Western thought, one free of the context of needing to prove ourselves better than that system.For all its horrors and atrocities, the Soviet economy grew, and worked.  Oh, not very well.  But better than 0% growth.  In 1910 the average Russian was an illiterate peasant.  In 1980 the average Russian was a literate urban dweller with electricity and indoor toilets on their floor with twice the life expectancy of their great-grandparents.This is, again, not intended as a defence of that monstrous system.  It can be condemned on purely moral grounds alone, in my opinion.  And it was not as efficient by most analyses, either.  Still, I bring it up because, as a counter-example, it complicates both of the commonly made assertions mentioned in the article: that poverty hasn't decreased in any meaningful sense, and that the capitalist system is the only means of greater than 0% growth in material production.