C and C++ prioritize performance over correctness
> In effect, Clang has noticed the uninitialized variable and chosen not to report the error to the user but instead to pretend i is always initialized above 10, making the loop disappear.No. This is what I call the "portable assembler"-understanding of undefined behavior and it is entirely false. Clang does not need to pretend that i is initialized with a value larger than 10, there is no requirement in the C standard that undefined behavior has to be explainable by looking at it like a portable assembler. Clang is free to produce whatever output it wants because the behavior of that code is literally _undefined_.Also, compilers don't reason about code the same way humans do. They apply a large number of small transformations, each of these transformations is very reasonable and it is their combination that results in "absurd" optimization results.I agree that undefined behavior is a silly concept but that's the fault of the standard, not of compilers. Also, several projects existed that aimed to fully define undefined behavior and produce a compiler for this fully defined C, none of them successful.