The database ruins all good ideas
The title of this piece is great: very catchy. But I don't think the content supports the title - by the end of it I wasn't at all clear /why/ the database ruins all good ideas.A few other points. First, horizontally scaling database reads is actually reasonably straight-forward these days: one leader, multiple replicas, load balance reads to the replicas and use a mechanism such that users that have just performed a write have their read traffic sent to the leader for the next 10 seconds or so.Not trivial, but also not impossibly difficult - plenty of places implement this without too much trouble.Scaling writes is a lot harder - but a well specc'd relational database server will handle tens of thousands of writes per second, so the vast majority of projects will never have to solve this.When you do need to solve this, patterns for horizontally sharding your data exist. They're not at all easy to implement, but it's not an impossible problem either.The article talks briefly about mocking your database: definitely never do this. How your database behaves should be considered part of your application code under test. Running a temporary database for your tests is a solved problem for most development frameworks these days (Django supports this out of the box).Overall, my experience is that the database /enables/ all good ideas. Building stateful applications without a relational database in the mix is usually the wrong choice.