One in three young people say they felt happier during lockdown
So 1 in 3 felt happier, 1 in 3 felt more depressed, and the remaining 1 in 3 felt no major change.Sounds pretty much like a normal (gaussian) distribution, or basically a non-story. Guessing if they measured satisfaction on a scale, the majority  were clustered near the "no major change" camp, as with any gaussian curve. As we already know, it turns out humans can adapt to things.By phrasing the headline result as "1 in 3 felt happier," it creates a narrative where there likely isn't one. You imagine the 33% were this solid block of people feeling much happier. But, re: the gaussian distribution, its likely very few were at the extremes, and most were clustered towards the middle.Textbook clickbait. It invites you to react with your emotional, anecdotal feelings about what this means to you, as if there was any interesting finding there.