Uber investigating breach of its computer systems
The common thread in all of these recent attacks (Uber, Twilio, Okta, etc) is the “phishability” of the authentication methods involved. Remote attacks like this only work when you can socially engineer an employee and phish sensitive credentials like a password from them (or a SMS one-time passcode during the MFA step).What’s head-scratching to me is why tech-forward enterprises haven’t been faster to adopt unphishable forms of authentication like WebAuthn. WebAuthn supports both built-in device biometrics like FaceID/TouchID and external hardware keys (eg YubiKey), which are inherently incapable of being phished — there’s no text-based secret for an attacker to deceive a user into sharing with them.I’m biased as I run an identity and access management company (stytch.com), but I hope more companies will consider integrating WebAuthn to support unphishable MFA.Today, WebAuthn introduces some nuances that can discourage a B2C company from supporting it today (e.g. account recovery with lost devices), but it’s a clear win for corporate network/workplace authentication and B2B apps. I believe some of the lack of adoption is due to complexity to build (more complex than traditional MFA) and cost for off-the-shelf solutions (Incumbents like Auth0/Okta require ~$30k annual commitments to let developers use WebAuthn). If you decide to build with Stytch, WebAuthn is included in our pay-as-you-go plan (https://stytch.com/products/webauthn)