Mozilla announces WebAssembly System Interface, what JVM should have been
No slight against WASM (which I've promoted), but early Java people would be well-advised to sit down somewhere they can sob in privacy, before reading this article:> ...you can't run Java code in a browser without a plugin...> ...WASM, being memory safe and tuned for validation, also has security advantages over Java applets...> ...explained the difference between WebAssembly and Java thus: "WebAssembly has been designed to scale from tiny devices to large server farms or CDNs...> ..."That's how important it is. WebAssembly on the server is the future of computing. A standardized system interface was the missing link...> ...But a write-once, run anywhere binary represents a worthwhile effort...