Appeals Court: Judge Can't Ignore the Supreme Court to Keep Patent Cases in TX
Not a lawyer and haven't read that many rulings, but this one looked pretty normal and not that "sarcasm-oozing" to me. These decisions often come with elaborate reasoning behind them, with references backing them up. Sometimes they need to use a "common meaning" of a term rather than a legal one, and so they might cite a dictionary. At least that is what this one looks like.The inverse of Poe’s law, or just a typical article trying to churn up some rageviews?