The Inequality Speech That TED Won't Show You
From Chris Anderson's justification for not publishing it:> But even if the talk was rated a home run, we couldn't release it, because it would be unquestionably regarded as out and out political. We're in the middle of an election year in the US. Your argument comes down firmly on the side of one party.So now it's unfairly partisan to point out that the evidence supports one party's position but not the other's? Really?What on earth is the point of taking an evidence-based approach to public policy issues, if not to draw conclusions about which public policies we should support?