The Full 10-Page Anti-Diversity Screed Circulating Internally at Google
The intellectual contortion required to get from the premise to the conclusion is actually quite impressive.> On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. These differences aren’t just socially constructed because:> They’re universal across human culturesExcept the gender ratio in science/engineering is anything but universal across cultures. 70% of science/engineering students in Iran are women: https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyguttman/2015/12/09/set-to-ta.... Indeed, in many parts of the world that are not known for being "liberal" with regard to gender equality, women make up a significantly higher percentage of the scientific workforce than in the U.S.: http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-science-technology-e... (44% in Latin America, 40% in Eastern Europe, 37% in the Arab states).In the Soviet Union, a majority of engineers were women; after the fall that proportion went way down (from 60% to 40%): 
http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6985/downlo....> Openness directed towards feelings and aesthetics rather than ideas. Women generally also have a stronger interest in people rather than things, relative to men (also interpreted as empathizing vs. systemizing).If this were true, shouldn't women's interest in CS be going up now that the web is all about feelings/aesthetics/social? Programming, in my view, is actually in the middle in the "people versus things" spectrum. It's much more about people than, say, math. And of course, 45% of math majors are women, so I'm not sure how that fits into the author's theory.> Women on average are more cooperativeMaybe, but does the degree of that effect explain the observed differences in representation? Tech is actually very cooperative. Compare, for example, litigation, which is all about confrontation and acrimony. But a third (and growing) of all litigators are women!