How a banner ad for H&R Block appeared on Apple.com without Apple’s OK
An interesting article but was overly verbose. Could have said the same thing in half the space.However, a big FU to Arstechnica for prostituting the name of Apple to get more visits to the article. The headline did not need to imply that Apple.com was hacked or that Apple was somehow unaware of what's happening at their site.It's sleazy journalism and beneath the usual ethics of Arstechnica