JSTOR Statement on Aaron Swartz
IMO, JSTOR isn't directly to blame. They are operating within a broken system, and it seems like they are doing what they can.Academic publishing is what needs a serious overhaul.After having worked in an academic library and, more recently, leading technology operations for a prominent new ebook publisher and article archive, the first two words that come to mind when I think of both publishing (academic and trade) and librarianship are "waste" and "bureaucracy."Librarians are supposed to be the ones advocating for the readers, but they are hobbled by a culture of committees, conferences, and politics. They work within organizations that are heavily stratified ("librarians" and "staff"), with all the worst aspects of severely hierarchical organizations.Recently I was also was privy to a variety of details during the formation of a new academic digital publisher, and it was the same kind of top-heavy, anti-"lean" structure you'd expect. The amount they were raising just to get started seemed absurd, especially when we were in the process of building a larger organization that did more with less funding.The point being, when you look under the surface, it's no wonder that everything in this space seems to cost more than necessary.There must be enough of us fed up, skilled, and idealistic enough to disrupt this space, creating new, actually modern publishers and/or publishing platforms if necessary.Does anyone with more domain expertise have any advice about where to start or what to focus on?