A “Better C” Benchmark
What I find funny is his choice of languages: 'hipe driven' I'd say.If you can use a GCd language like Go why would you go with Rust(which add a lot of complexity) or Zig(which is unsafe(1)) instead of the numerous existing GCd languages D,Nim, Crystal, Java,... which provides memory safety without complexityIf you can't why evaluate Go instead of Ada or DasBetterC?1: At work a frequent issue in C++ is UAF a pointer to a stack variable which outlives the function, Zig don't help you here..