In Defense of Inclusionism
Every year something in my brain breaks and I think "I know, I'll finally get rsync.net a wikipedia entry".This is somewhat important because the little-hitler that owns (yes, owns) the "cloud storage" wikipedia page refuses all additions of cloud storage providers that "aren't notable".  So therefore, rsync.net has to have a wikipedia page.This shouldn't be a problem - rsync.net has been mentioned in the press widely over the course of over 10 years - everything from articles about our warrant canary to articles about our ZFS support.  In fact, other wikipedia pages mention and discuss rsync.net.You know where this is going.A perfectly well written article, well cited with 15+ citations from "respectable" journalist sources is nearly insta-deleted due to notability.Every single time.  I've tried 4-5 times over the past few years.  Every time it's a different little-hitler that swoops in to bravely defend wikipedia.