A Reply to Josef Průša
> This includes activities that are intentionally exploitative such producing 1:1 clones of open hardware with minimal changesI’m astonished by this opinion. They released their designs under a permissive licence. Should people be mind readers and figure out that they actually meant that you should not make  1:1 clones?Would you call it “intentionally exploitative” if I build the linux kernel on my computer?They willingly, and without any coercion choose a licence which let anyone build and sell a clone of their product.    Let’s not pretend that those who then go and do that following all the licence requirements are somehow bad.