Fig: Fast, isolated development environments using Docker
I'm not involved with this project but there is some confusions in this thread, maybe I can share my point of view:Docker is a tool to run processes with some isolation and, that's the big selling point, nicely packaged with "all" their dependencies as images.To understand "all" their dependencies, think C dependencies for e.g. a Python or Ruby app. That's not the kind of dependencies e.g. virtualenv can solve properly. Think also assets, or configuration files.So instead of running `./app.py` freshly downloaded from some Git , you would run `docker run  ./app.py`. In the former case, you would need to care of, say, the C dependencies. In the second case, they are packaged in the image that Docker will download from  prior to run the ./app.py process in it. (Note that the two  are not the same things. One is a Git repo, the other is a Docker repo.)So really at this point, that's what Docker is about: running processes. Now Docker offers a quite rich API to run the processes: shared volumes (directories) between containers (i.e. running images), forward port from the host to the container, display logs, and so on.But that's it: Docker as of now, remains at the process level. While it provides options to orchestrate multiple containers to create a single "app", it doesn't address the managemement of such group of containers as a single entity.And that's where tools such as Fig come in: talking about a group of containers as a single entity. Think "run an app" (i.e. "run an orchestrated cluster of containers") instead of "run a container".Now I think that Fig comes short of that goal (I haven't played with it, that's just from a glance at its docuementation). Abstracting over the command-line arguments of Docker by wrapping them in a JSON file is the easy part (i.e. launching a few containers). The hard part is about managing the cluster as Docker manages the containers: display aggregated logs, replace a particular container by a new version, move a container to a different host, and thus abstract the networking between different hosts, and so on.This is not a negative critique of Fig. Many people are working on that problem. For instance I solve that very problem with ad-hoc bash scripts. Doing so we are just exploring the design space.I believe that Docker itself will provide that next level in the future; it is just that people need the features quickly.tl;dr:Docker -> processesFig (and certainly Docker in the future) -> clusters (or formations) of processes