Speed of Rust vs. C
> "Clever" memory use is frowned upon in Rust. In C, anything goes.No, it does not. If Rust programmers don't have discipline in C, other people have.And don't drag out some random CVE numbers again. These are about a fraction of existing C projects, many of them were started 1980-2000.It is an entirely different story if a project is started with sanitizers, Valgrind and best practices.I'm not against Rust, except that they managed to take OCaml syntax and make it significantly worse. It's just ugly and looks like design by committee.But the evangelism is exhausting. I also wonder why corporations are pushing Rust. Is it another method to take over C projects that they haven't assimilated yet?