KDE.org migrated to Hugo
I used Hugo some years ago[1] and my memory of it was mostly negative in terms of usability. I revisited it again this year for another project and it drove me so mad that I ended up switching to Zola[2].My issue with Hugo was that it just wasn't reliable with what was in the cache so I could never trust whether what I saw was actually the state of the site and causing me to push a broken state to the remote server. Hugo is great if it works but I found it a nightmare to deal with when it doesn't.There are countless options in Hugo (yes I understand it's powerful but I rather it just had half the option and they work as advertised), some of which at times are contradictory so searching for solutions took me ages. I have no affiliation with the zola project and am not even big on Rust. Zola just worked for me and seems a lot less "hacky" than hugo thanks to the Tera templating system.The Author of Zola writes on his github:> [hugo] personally drives me insane, to the point of writing my own template engine and static site generator. a sentiment that I share very much.[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20180714043311/https://iotdarwin...[2] https://github.com/getzola/zola[3] https://github.com/getzola/after-dark