My website is one binary
I think it’s perfectly fine to do whatever you want because it’s fun, but some of the other justification for accepting and rejecting dependencies seems a bit weird.For example, one of your reasons for rejecting Hugo is that you can’t read all the code including dependencies and future updates yourself. However, you have no problems with using Go, which has a pretty large standard library and a lot of code for its implementation. Have you read through all of it? Sure, choosing Hugo is strictly worse by this metric (because it’s written in Go), but is even the goal of reading all source code and keeping up with changes tractable if Go is a dependency?Another one is your rejection of GitHub pages for uptime and future maintenance. There are many reasons you might not want to use it, but I don’t think those in particular are compelling ones. If you just use it to host plain or even templated HTML, then the migration cost if and when they fail is pretty low right? Just switch to one of the other HTTPS hosts or do the self hosting thing then?The maintenance tradeoff for not using GitHub pages is quite high too. I see your website is using HTTPS. In my opinion managing certificates is more maintenance than using GitHub pages. And then there are security updates.Dynamically generating websites has a security tradeoff too. Are you keeping your toolchain up to date? Go has had vulnerabilities in the past.BTW, I’m not not criticising your approach, just some of the justification for it. It sounds pretty neat to have a single binary website, but I’m not too sure about all the other justification.