DeepLog: Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis from System Logs (2017) [pdf]
I am skeptical of anomaly detection since in my experience anomalies are common and diverse and don't actually matter, so I expect these systems to basically inundate people with false positives.Their offline training accuracy is garbage: 16% precision, so all of the real work is basically being done in the online training portion, which gets it to a respectable 82%+ precision.But they don't tell you how many alerts they had to label to get those numbers. Maybe over the long run you get those numbers, but you really want to know if it takes 10 or 10,000 examples to get there.Also, their dataset distribution is very different to reality: they have 7% of their dataset annotated as real anomalies; I don't think anyone in the real world wants 5% of their log entries to get flagged as anomalies. So I expect their precision numbers to be far worse on more realistically distributed logs.