Tor Project Sued
Not a lawyer, let alone a Texas lawyer.But two pages in and plaintiff has already seemingly misrepresented to the court: where does Tor's website show that they are aware of either this particular hidden service, or this site?There most certainly cannot be any "conspiracy" with someone they don't know about, or any "meeting of the minds" without evidence they've even spoken! That's just plain clear old-fashioned bullshit.I've never heard of it before and there are no indications that they found the "pinkmeth.com" site hard to serve at all: it's a .com.Tor should be discharged as a party: they are completely irrelevant to this case.