Why Did The Media Keep The Recent Peaceful Icelandic Revolution Quiet?
Which is an easier explanation to believe?1. The "media" got together and said to each other, "We better not cover this story at all, because it will give too many people dangerous ideas"or2. Media outlets individually (particularly in the US) decided not to cover the actions of the Icelandic government because they think most of their viewers don't care much about Iceland and/or because "check out what has slowly been happening in Iceland over the past 5 years" isn't much of a breaking news story.This story has been covered, but just because it isn't to the extent that you wish it was covered does not mean a conspiracy must exist.NPR did a story on Iceland just two days ago: http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2013/02/01/170867071/episode-...