OO in Python is mostly pointless
In general, object orientation is a reasonably elegant way of binding together a compound data type and functions that operate on that data type.  Let us accept this at least, and be happy to use it if we want to!  It is useful.What are emphatically not pretty or useful are Python’s leading underscores to loosely enforce encapsulation. Ugh.  I’d sooner use camelCase.Nor do I find charming the belligerent lack of any magical syntactic sugar for `self`. Does Python force you to pass it as an argument to make some kind of clever point?  Are there psychotic devs out there who call it something other than `self`? Yuck!And why are some classes (int, str, float) allowed to be lower case but when I try to join that club I draw the ire from the linters?  The arrogance!...but I still adore Python.  People call these things imperfections but it’s just who we are.PS I liked the Python5 joke a lot.