MacOS command line version of the WireGuard VPN is now available for testing
> It’s a little hard to overstate how big a deal this is. [...] Nobody trusts either codebase, or, for that matter, either crypto protocol. Both are nightmares to configure and manage.Those seem quite the overstatements. I don't remember having any particular distrust in OpenVPN's codebase or protocol. I also didn't have that much trouble configuring neither the server nor the clients. I particularly liked how OpenVPN's configuration is basically putting command line arguments in a file. I could test configurations by simply changing invocations of openvpn, and when I found something I liked, I just put the options in a file and enabled the service to use that configuration file. Compared to the configuration of other kinds of services, OpenVPN is pretty simple.EDIT: This is my first time hearing of WireGuard. I can't say how it compares, but the way this reads like a sales pitch and is so dismissive of SSH and OpenVPN, both of which I've had nothing but good experiences from, doesn't leave a good impression on me. I mean:> Death to SSH over the public Internet. Death to OpenVPN. Death to IPSEC. Long live WireGuard!Really?This page would've been more effective on me if it objectively described how WireGuard was better than these technologies.