RFC 9293: Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
I wish government legislature did this with their bills. Reading a piece of legislation is maddening because it's always just a description of diffs, without seeing the final outcome.I never really realized that this symptom was common with RFCs as well.Is there something about how governing bodies work that lead to this style of output? Why aren't we using a bit more modern techniques now, more akin to how word processors let you see the diffs inline but also the final format? Or git-style PRs that show the deltas but you can always just view "main"?