In Head-Hunting, Big Data May Not Be Such a Big Deal
Insofar as this interview speaks to the relevance of brainteasers to actual software development / engineering, it fails to provide a meaningful topic of conversation.  It surprises me that nobody's pointed out that at best the conclusions are relevant to engineering "leadership" performance, rather than -- as I expected for "Google" and "head-hunting" -- coding performance.  Sure, people skills and team skill are important, but if you're going to get good at selecting for leadership and ignore selecting for productivity, to the extent they're not related you're not going to be very good at creating and maintaining software.  Although software isn't 100% of Google's success and coding productivity isn't 100% of software success, it's pretty important.