Ontario announces that it will begin a basic income trial in 2016
Can someone explain to me why universal basic income seems to be more popular than negative income taxes these days?  To use some examples I'm picking out of my hat:1. Universal basic income: Everyone gets $10K per year.2. Negative income tax: Everyone gets $15K per year, phased out linearly across an income of $60K (i.e. if you earn $0 you get $15K, if you earn $20K you get $10K, if you earn $40K you get $5K, and if you earn $60K then the negative income tax is fully phased out).Why is 1 preferable to 2?  Is it just that it's less susceptible to tax fraud?  Note that the amount that an unemployed person gets in UBI is less, because the same amount of money is being distributed to more people, even millionaires.