Disappointing Unsealing Decision in Aaron Swartz Case
Another perspective: http://tech.mit.edu/V133/N26/swartz.html Swartz's lawyers initially sought complete release of information with no redaction of identifying information (including SSNs and Birthdates see: Pre-motion statements and the actions regarding maintenance of certain records they were obligated to destroy at the end of the prosecution). Clearly balance is needed and the employees of the victims in a criminal prosecution (JSTOR, MIT) deserve reasonable protection.edit: Minor increase in clarity, re:reply