Ethical considerations of access to the HackerOne community
I looked through the task manager of a corporate issued laptop and saw tasks belonging to very similar companies, as part of the disk image IT makes.The corporation likely has a license for the software, as well as conditions for all their employees to expect monitoring.A formalized bug bounty program would enable the software producer to have secure software.Why exactly is HackerOne drawing a distinction with this software producer? I read the whole article and still miss what the controversy with this producer is.Is all monitoring software now banned from HackerOne under the guise of a moral high ground HackerOne just created?