Highest French court reclassifies Uber drivers as employees
> The criteria for self-employment include the possibility of building up one's own clientele, the
freedom to set one's own rates, and the freedom to set the terms and conditions for providing one's
services.Immediately I'd seem to agree with this statement. I think of typical self-employment businesses; hairdressers, freelance developers, etc and this seems to apply. You can set your own rate and your own terms, even if those may kill your chance at being competitive.But if you think deeper into this, then this criteria isn't always true.Here's a scenario: I publish an ad on a handyman site asking for a new shed built for £100. People can place their interest and their proposal. The price is fixed at £100, and I may set other terms and criteria. Nobody is going to argue that the builders are employees of the exchange site. Uber isn't entirely different (it just simplifies the process). Its drivers are allowed to deny a ride, and can see the cost upfront.Really the difference in these types of self-employment seems to be that the customer approached a set of potential suppliers, rather than vice versa, and the customer set the terms and the self-employed get to accept/deny. In the typical scenario (hairdressers, etc) they set the terms to potential customers who get to accept/deny.I don't agree or disagree with the classification of Uber drivers as employees, I just don't agree with the criteria of the court in this case.