Clinton tweeted her unhappiness with the man who beat her in 2016, in this specific case for what he said about abortion (and infanticide) in his very well-received and moving State of the Union (SOTU) address.
As is always the case with abortion apologists, Clinton tosses out sound bites without context.
There is nothing (as we discussed earlier today and umpteen times before) to back up the assertion that these post-20 week abortions are "almost always because a woman's health or life is at risk, or the pregnancy is no longer viable." Nothing. Even the abortion industry's think-tank, the Guttmacher Institute, and the raft of pro-abortion professors at places such as the University of California San Francisco admit that is not true.
The "only" reference applies to late abortions in a different sense. Only rarely is a baby aborted this late because of a fetal anomaly. In other words, as always, Clinton's talking points have everything backwards.
"Lying"? Who is lying, Hillary Clinton or President Trump? Mrs. Clinton, of course, whenever the topic is abortion.
Ms. Brown takes the time to go to the New York Times article to which Clinton linked, written by Pam Belluck. It is replete with the customary go-to points by apologists for late term abortions.
To give you some idea of the reliability of science in this domain, Belluck offers two examples of the discussion over fetal pain, both outdated.
The second was a 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists review of research which concluded that "most neuroscientists believe that the cortex is necessary for pain perception" so "the fetus cannot experience pain in any sense prior" to 24 weeks (to quote Belluck). That has been debunked by, among others, Dr. Peter Saunders.
Note the dates– 2005 and 2010—and both were summarizing research previously published. Have we learned nothing new about the reality of fetal pain in a decade?
To the Hillary Clintons of this world, the scientific world stands still. This allows them to cling to myths that assuage their consciences and fool the public.