The Law Review Online Presents: Judicial Independence and Accountability
Case Notes - University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online presents "Independent and Accountable Courts in Perilous Times: Perspectives from the Academy, the Bench, and the Bar," a series of articles, essays, and commentaries addressing the current state and direction of the judiciary. Contributors include scholars, judges, and practitioners whose extensive experience and diverse perspectives illuminate the relationship between judicial independence and accountability, as well as the forces which shape that relationship. Contributions to the series will be published throughout the summer and fall, starting with Professor Stephen B. Burbank's "Reconsidering Judicial Independence: Forty Years in the Trenches and in the Tower."
Reevaluating Galaviz v. Berg: An Analysis of Forum-Selection Provisions in Unilaterally Adopted Corporate Bylaws as Requirements Contracts
Bonnie White
160 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 390 (2012)
A Throwback to Less Enlightened Practices: J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro
Zach Vosseler
Recent Series Essays
Considering Reconsidering Judicial Independence
Charles Gardner Geyh
Reconsidering Judicial Independence: Forty‐Five Years in the Trenches and in the Tower
Stephen B. Burbank
Of Laundering and Legal Fees: The Implications of United States v. Blair for Criminal Defense Attorneys who Accept Potentially Tainted Funds
Philip J. Griffin
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus and the (Bleak) Future of Statutes that Ban False Statements in Political Campaigns
Margaret H. Zhang
There's a TV App For That: Putting the "Neutral" Back in Net Neutrality for the App-Based Television Future
Lindsay Fritchman