MenuNews Insight Videos About Subscribe
Racist's Change of Heart Proves: Discussing and Disagreeing over Our Beliefs is Vital
09.17.2019 | Commentary | Daily Surge |
Surge Summary: A recent change of heart in a person who had held racist beliefs reminds us that discussing, disagreeing and reasoning over what we believe is vital – it helps individuals understand what others believe and helps them understand what they themselves claim to believe, as well.
by Lewis Waha
If people fear what they don't understand, then one of the most feared things today is religious liberty. It's standard practice for mainstream and left-leaning news outlets to handle the notion with scare quotes when it conflicts with the civil rights claims of sexual minorities. Reporters routinely relay the talking point that religious liberty is just "a license to discriminate."
That narrative got a boost last week when a viral video showed a Mississippi wedding venue operator citing her religious beliefs in refusing to serve an interracial couple. In the video, she responds to questioning by the groom's sister, saying, "First of all, we don't do gay weddings or mixed race—because of our Christian race. I mean, our Christian belief. I don't want to argue my faith. … [W]e just don't participate. We just choose not to."
After a flurry of condemnation, the woman consulted her pastor, learned that the Bible does not mention "biracial relationships," and apologized on the venue's Facebook page.
The president of the Human Rights Campaign responded by tweeting "Religion should never be exploited as a license to discriminate," adding that it exemplifies the persistence of "white supremacy and anti-LGBTQ bigotry."
In an age of sharp political polarization and evergreen newsfeed outrage, little is obvious anymore, and nothing can be taken for granted. So let's be clear that antigay animus and racism are wrong, and that we always ought to condemn actions motivated by those attitudes.
That said, this episode has a farcical quality to it. Awkwardly correcting oneself from "Christian race" to "Christian belief" looks like a racist Freudian slip. It's a real-life parody of the worst stereotype of bigotry, where the bigot is inept and evil all at once.
Even more remarkable though is the ignorance of Christian moral teaching, not just on the venue operator's part, but also on the part of alarmists menaced by her religious appeal. In her apology, the woman attributed her belief in antimiscegenation to her upbringing. This suggests she was acting as a cultural Christian, familiar with the trappings of faith but lacking knowledge that a regenerate follower of Christ should come to acquire. We might suppose she would question a racist upbringing given the teaching in Galatians 3:28 that "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female" in Christ. Or, we might suppose she would learn that Christians are to be countercultural rather than uncritical of their native culture.
But beyond a lacking of basic Christian knowledge, this person has internalized modernity's assumption that faith should be privatized, kept to oneself as part of a live-and-let-live pact of liberalism. Her saying "I don't want to argue my faith" echoes the position of philosopher Martha Nussbaum. Assessing the Trinity to be an incoherent concept that undermines Christian claims to rationality, Nussbaum once concluded that "reasonable citizens should not be in the business of looking over the shoulders of their fellow citizens to ask whether" their deeply held beliefs stem from coherent reasoning. To her, "Such scrutiny . . . has no place in a respectful political liberalism."
This consensus between a Mississippian antimiscegenist and a renowned Hyde Park feminist must give us pause. Citizens who are discouraged from asking whether each other's deepest held beliefs are reasonable fail not just to know reasons for others' beliefs; they fail to know reasons for their own beliefs. Further, they lose opportunities to exercise the virtues of patience and charity that liberal societies depend upon to survive. When those virtues atrophy, it shouldn't be surprising that demagogues exploit citizens' mutual ignorance to dismiss others as bigots. To its shame, the U.S. Civil Rights Commission did this in 2016 when it suggested religious liberty and religious freedom are "code words for discrimination." And in 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined Colorado officials' dismissal of baker Jack Phillips' beliefs—as "a despicable piece of rhetoric"—to be a denial of his due process.
Rather than suppose that mutual respect requires we hunker down and leave each other's beliefs unexamined, Americans must continue to value a rigorous, sometimes uncomfortable exchange of ideas. Contrary to elite opinion, traditional Christians can hold their own giving reasons in the public square. Rather than letting personal and religious reasons rust from lack of use, we must reinvigorate what law scholar John Inazu has called a "confident pluralism." Otherwise, not only will we go on fearing others' deeply held moral reasons; we will too often not know our own.
Originally posted here.
The views expressed here are the author's and not necessarily those of Daily Surge.
Image by rawpixel from Pixabay
—Lewis Waha holds an M.A. in Christian Apologetics from Biola University and is a freelance writer focusing on faith in the public square.
Stay in the loop on killer content,
exclusive videos, and much more!
← Previous Story More of Same? New York Times Levels New Wobbly Charges at Bret Kavanaugh
Next Story → Please, Not the Gay Penguins Again — It Didn't Turn Out Well Last Time
Trending Now on Daily Surge
Providence, Sanctity of Human Life Sunday, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
'America's Most Trusted Man'? Fauci Admits He Selectively Mislead America on COVID
Crackdown on Conservatives? So, What Should We Do Now?
Hurtling Down the Slippery Slope of Modern 'Marriage' on HGTV
Conservatives, Christians: Can't Lose the Culture and Expect to Win Elections
What's Your Time Worth in the Year Ahead? And Beyond?
Leftist on the Move! (And So Is Creeping – and Creepy – Brand of Modern Fascism)
U.S. Capitol Riots: Leftist Double Standard Is Hard to Take
Revolution in France: Planned, Preached, Promoted by Leftist Thugs — Sound Familiar?
So Far, Politics in the New Year, 2021: More Secrecy, Less Openness
Turnaround: Hillary's Russian Connection; Trump's Declassification Order
Joe Biden's Latest Gaffe Is As Stupid As You Might Imagine
No, It Was Not Jesus-Loving Evangelicals Who Vandalized the Capitol
'Malcolm in the Middle' Star Frankie Muniz: 'I'm Definitely' a Conservative
Head-Scratcher: When Did Parents Get Shut Out of Their Children's Education?
American Patriot's Must Rise Up and Stop Nation's Rush to the Bottom
Democrat Divisions: Yes, They Exist Right Now — and Could Spell Trouble for Party
Surging Now
Pompeo: Chinese Communists Dangerously Inside the Gates of the United States
Copyright © 2021 DailySurge.com. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Klicked Media