It is an important question. For if the church has no purpose, then why would we gather on Sunday morning? Unlike other faiths, where non-attendance is considered a sin, Unitarian Universalists, do not have such a creed. So, for these other faiths, attending church is in a way to avoid committing at least one sin, and is easily averted.
There are some Unitarian Universalist congregations where Sunday morning offers a nice program. Several years ago there was one congregation that invited me to speak. The service was not a religious service but a program of a chamber quartet performance. The words I offered were considered the intermission for the quartet. There were no hymnals for congregational singing. There were no prayers or meditations, no recognition of a community of people, there was no children's time, just a program of Sunday morning music and some words offered. Very nice, very relaxing but in my mind not congruent with the purpose of church.
What is the purpose of church? For the congregation that loved their chamber music, the purpose of their church was to offer a morning where one could relax with some nice music and have coffee afterwards.
There is a story told about Rev. William Ellery Channing, known in our Unitarian history as the author of the defining sermon "Unitarian Christianity." One Sunday morning, he was crossing the Boston Common on his way to church when he saw one of his parishioners walking towards him. They greeted one another, and Rev. Channing asked the parishioner where they were going since church was about to start within the half hour. The parishioner said, I know what you are going to say about the topic being offered so I am going to do something of more importance. That was the last Sunday in which Rev. Channing offered a title and a blurb on his Sunday morning message.
If the reason for attending church is only for the sake of hearing an interesting topic or lecture, then I think that is a poor purpose for church. There are other venues, especially in a university town, that can meet that important need.
Yes, I hope the words and meditations I offer are encouraging and perhaps even challenging, but my words or thoughts should not be the primary draw here. I have no desire to be a celebrity pastor like Joel Osteen or TD Jakes, or Norman Vincent Peale. These people speak eloquently from the pulpit their doctrinal beliefs and thousands of people flock to them for the chance to hear an inspiring message or make them feel good about themselves.
And if a person stays away from church because they think they know what is going to be said in the pulpit and therefore wants to do something of more importance, I believe they are missing the point of church. I have shared in the past that before I became a Unitarian Universalist, I lived in an intentional Christian community. We met, not only to pray together, but also to minister to one another. If we were not there, we could not minister to others nor be ministered to. If we were not there we were not living up to our individual calling. I still carry this purpose in Unitarian Universalism, though how we minister to one another might be, no, I guarantee, is vastly different from the Christian community in style and scope. We each have something to offer to one another here in this place. It may be to offer a listening ear to someone who has not had anyone listen to them all week long. It might be to offer a hug to someone who has not received any human touch this past week. It may be to offer a joke or two and allow belly laughs to occur which releases endorphins to make us feel good and reduces pain.
Unitarian Universalism is a covenantal and not a doctrinal faith. We covenant with one another to uphold and encourage one another to pursue a set of aspirational principles. The inherent worth and dignity of every person. Justice, equity, and compassion in human relations. Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations. A free and responsible search for truth and meaning. The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large. The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all. Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.
These are difficult aspirations to uphold. We are going to fall short in the fulfillment of them in our daily lives but it is important, and given our current national environment, vital for us to come together to encourage one another to not lose heart in holding these aspirations as possible for our lives, for our congregation, for our community, and for our nation.
We need one another in these days of intense pain being inflicted upon women, LGBTQ, immigrants, and people of color by our own government. Our current national administration is stripping our civil rights away and we need the strength to resist the rollbacks of rights and protections. These cold-hearted inhumane rollbacks of protections are causing great pain in our families, in our neighborhoods, and in our communities.
But these are not the only pain people in our congregations are facing. We have people grieving the loss of family members. We have people grieving the loss of employment. We have people who are struggling in their marriage. We have people who are lonely, people who suffer traumas from childhood or from military service. We have people who are struggling with all sorts of infirmaries, both short term and chronic. We cannot minister to one another if we do not attend our main service a week. Each of us has a role to minister to one another and it need not be a conscious effort to do so. Sometimes it is the willingness to listen to one another that is all that is needed that offers a balm of healing and comfort. And each of you have the unique gift of yourself that may be just the thing that someone else needs to hear or see. But if you are not here, because you think you know what the speaker is going to say that you have heard it all, then that person who is needing to hear that encouraging word that only you can give, will leave here empty-handed.
Sometimes in our lives we all have pain
We all have sorrow
But if we are wise
We know that there's always tomorrow … Number 1021 join me in singing…
The purpose of church is not the elements of the worship service. The liturgy, the music, the hymn singing, the words shared from the pulpit. These are only elements to a much greater purpose, which is to minister to one another in a community of relationships. And in this place, there is a covenant, a promise that each member here says when they sign the membership book, that they will participate in the life of the congregation. At every membership recognition service, I recite these words to our members [1]:
You are here this morning because you have chosen to be in a relationship with these people and with this religious institution. "I can take care of myself" has been replaced by "We can and will take care of each other." Your membership also tells the world that you believe in and support the need for the free religious voice amidst the religious pluralism of our country and our world. "We need not think alike to love alike" said Francis David in 16th century Hungary. This is the basis by which our individual searches for truth and meaning are encouraged within this loving and supportive community. Becoming a member of a Unitarian Universalist congregation is your opportunity to find inherent worth, affirmation, appreciation of diversity and respect for commitment. It is also a path to salvation, understood not as entry into another world at death, but rather as the recognition that wholeness, health and loving relationship are available to each of us right here and now, within this life and this world.
Members of the congregation then renew their pledge to walk together in the ways of truth and affection, as best we know them now or may learn them in days to come, that we and our children may be fulfilled, and that we may speak to the world, in words and in action, of peace and good will.
These are not idle words. They are a promise to one another. A promise and a calling. A calling to strive to be supportive of one another, to listen from the heart, to respond from the heart.
The purpose of the church, as we have declared it to be in our covenant is one that is sorely needed in our world today. If we build on this covenant here with one another, by meeting weekly as we are able, then as our relationships grow we gain the confidence and the skills to take our faith, our principles that we seek to uphold here into our daily lives as a beacon of hope for all to see. We will begin to find ourselves ministering to others, friends and strangers alike, because that is who we are as a people. People who are moving on the side of love. And that is the purpose of church. Blessed Be.
[1] Adapted from Alice Blair Wesley lectures found in Our Covenant: The 2000-01 Minns Lectures
Sermon delivered to the Unitarian Universalist Congregation on 10 September 2017(c) by Rev. Fred L Hammond
Tags: Ministering, Mission, Purpose, Unitarian Universalism, UU Worship
(I was asked to speak at the No Moore Rally today at the Alabama Supreme Court Building in Montgomery, AL. Judge Roy Moore was being tried on six out of seven ethics violations when he urged Alabama Probate Judges to disobey US Supreme Court Ruling on the constitutionality of Same Sex Marriage. Here is what I said.)
We have been standing here for quite some time now awaiting the verdict that Judge Moore is found guilty of violating the Supreme Court orders to enforce marriage equality in this state. Judge Moore believes that he is above the law of the land. He believes he is called to impose his brand of religion onto the citizens of this state. He believes that his brand of religion is the one true faith, that he has the pure and unadulterated interpretation of the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures. That all other interpretations of these sacred texts are heresy and therefore should be purged from the state of Alabama.
However, Judge Moore does not live in a country where only one religion is declared the official government religion. Where only one interpretation of that religion is sanctioned. Where other religions are persecuted.
The United States does not have an official government sanctioned religion. Here we have religious pluralism and the promise of religious freedom for all religions to not only be practiced but to have their rituals protected and recognized by the Government. This protection is found in our nation's most sacred of texts, a text that Judge Moore vowed to uphold in his role as judge.
From the Declaration of Independence: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all people are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness—that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
Preamble of the Constitution of the United States. We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Constitution of the United States, 1st Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Constitution of the United States, 14 Amendment, Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
It is from these documents that I stand here today to proclaim that my faith, which teaches me to love one another, no matter who you are or whom you love is to be respected under this constitution. My religion, while a minority religion in the state of Alabama, has under the US Constitution the legal and moral authority to have its marriages recognized by the government of these states. This right has been denied the members of my faith and other faiths for decades. It was a right that was finally recognized by the Supreme Court as being fully constitutional.
Roy Moore and his ilk want to deny people, who do not agree with his religious faith, their rights as citizens of these United States. The followers of his religious faith are not hindered in any way by the practices of those who follow another faith or who follow no faith, just as my faith is not hindered in any way by the practices of his. Where hindrance occurs is when followers of his faith demand that I and others adhere to his faith tenets.
In countries where there is one sanctioned religion his approach would be legal but here in the United States all people are free to practice their faith. All people have the right to pursue happiness.
But here is thing; Judge Moore's faith doesn't even follow the tenets of his religion. His professed religion is Christianity.
Jesus declared that for his followers, and I am reading from the King James version, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Judge Moore violates this commandment. He is not loving his neighbor. His behaviors show no respect for the diversity of his neighbors. His behaviors show only contempt which goes against his very faith which insists on following the author of love, by doing unto others as you would have them do unto you.
I feel sorry for Judge Moore. I do. Truly. I feel sorry for him because he has no love in his heart. He has walled himself off from knowing the freedom that divine love gives to each of us when we are willing to be embraced by that love. He is afraid. And in his fear, he attacks others who have found the freedom that love bestows.
That love for one another is expressed in the Christian Scriptures of Galatians 3:28. Here is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
We do not need to be afraid of each other any longer because when love is present, when love is placed at the center of our hearts, the need to separate us into categories falls away. The desire for ensuring mutual respect of our differences rises to the fore.
But Judge Moore has not experienced the very redemption his Christian faith teaches him. Redemption is more than just reciting a few words on a page. And the Redemption I am talking about is not just in the life to come, but redemption in this life. Freedom in this life which our founding parents of this nation in their wisdom codified into law—the redemption of being able to have life and the pursuit of happiness. He does not know this redeeming love. He only knows hatred for others who not only are different than he is, but have found happiness and love through that difference.
He is going to need a bit of a nudge from today to be told once again, that he does not have the right to enforce his hatred onto the citizens of Alabama. He does not have the right to impose his version of Christianity onto the citizens of Alabama—who have found the power of love through other Christian denominations, through Judaism, through Islam, through Buddhism, through Baha'i, through Sikhism, through Taoism, through atheism, through humanism, through Jainism, through Wiccan, through indigenous faiths, and yes, even through my faith, Unitarian Universalism.
Judge Moore, you have betrayed the trust of the state of the Alabama by violating our most sacred creeds as a nation. Not just once, but twice. You must be removed from office this day. And you cannot be allowed to serve a public office again because you have proven yourself as not being able to hold the people's rights above your own interests and agendas. Perhaps one day you will realize that Love is Love and that all people have the right to experience love and have that love recognized by the government.
Tags: Declaration of Independence, Judge Roy Moore, No Moore Rally, Preamble to US Constitution, religious freedom, same sex marriage as religious freedom, Same-sex marriage, Unitarian Universalism
Dear Chief Justice Moore:
As a citizen of Alabama, I am rather disappointed in your press conference comments. Not only did they portray the events on January 12th incorrectly, they expressed defamation of character of a private citizen.
The facts are Ambrosia Starling did not officiate a wedding on January 12th. I did. I am an ordained minister in the Unitarian Universalist faith and serve the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Tuscaloosa. It is part of my religion to honor and bless the covenanted relations that we enter into and with couples that includes the rites of marriage. I do not do mock weddings. To have my faith honored with recognizing the marriages that I officiate is an example of the religious freedom that this country honors and values since the days of the founding of this nation's constitution. It is in the Bill of Rights that the government shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion or the practice thereof.
Yet, for far too long, this country has forbade my religion's right to solemnize marriages of same gender weddings and have them recognized by the state. You say this is not about religion, but it is, Justice Moore. It is. By denying equal marriage rights, you are declaring your faith doctrines to be supreme over all religious doctrines and practices and that is simply not the American way in regards to religious freedom. Religious freedom means being able to practice one's religion without fear of government censure. Not being able to have couples' marriages recognized by the state is a form of government censure of religion. For you to declare the wedding I officiated a mockery is a show of profound disrespect of the religion I serve as minister. A religion whose American roots date back to the founding of this nation.
The bills being passed under the guise of religious freedom are privileging a certain sect of Christianity. It does not represent the whole of Christianity nor does it protect any other religions' practice. It is sanctioned discrimination against anyone whose faith does not align with this branch of Christianity. This is not religious freedom. It is religious oppression.
I am authorized by my church and faith tradition to officiate marriages of same gender couples. The marriage I officiated on January 12, 2016, included the signing of the marriage license issued by a probate judge in Alabama. That certificate was filed according to Alabama statutes and a marriage certificate was issued the couple recognizing them as a married couple. If this marriage was illegal and in defiance of your order as you claim, then I would have expected the probate judge to not have issued the license. Further, I would expect that if this was illegal that you would file charges against probate judges who did not follow your order, making every probate judge who has issued licenses accountable to your ruling. But you have done no such filing and therefore, you have not enforced the law as you claim exists. Why? Because you know you have no authority to overrule the US Supreme Court ruling that lifted the ban on same sex marriages.
But that is not what you stated at the press conference. Instead you claimed the complaints were an attack on your character. You claimed you were a victim of the media misrepresenting your orders. Then you made defamatory statements insinuating the mental instability of a private citizen. You are not a licensed Mental Health professional, therefore you have no authority to diagnose or even publicly speculate on the mental health of another person.
As a judge in the attempts to answer complaints on your defiance of a US Supreme Court Ruling, you have once again violated your own profession's ethics by making these inflammatory statements against a private citizen. It was an attempt to discredit Ambrosia Starling's and other's complaints against your ethical conduct. It was an attempt to inflict injury on Ambrosia Starling's reputation. I see you. I see what you are trying to do and it is offensive, not only personally offensive, but offensive to the citizens of this state.
You defended your orders based on the Alabama Supreme Court ruling which by your own quoting the US Constitution at the press conference revealed that it was over ruled by the US Supreme Court. Your own words convict you. Yet, you insist you are in the right. You have shown repeated disregard for the US Supreme Court which ruled that the bans against same sex marriage are unconstitutional. Your own colleagues of the Alabama Supreme Court do not side with you in this matter. In fact, your colleagues of the Alabama Supreme Court dismissed on March 4 of this year, a challenge to same sex marriages made by some probate judges and a conservative policy group. The Alabama Supreme Court is adhering to the US Supreme Court ruling.
You state your orders are still in effect. Yet, even the Alabama Supreme Court by their dismissing the challenge declare your orders are not in effect any longer. If they were in effect still, then they would not have dismissed the challenge to same sex marriage. The federal and Alabama state courts have spoken on this matter. Your legal opinion has been declared unconstitutional by the highest court in the land. There is no conflict between the courts as you stated at your press conference. They are now in sync.
If you, in good conscience, cannot abide by the highest court in the land then to protect your integrity you need to step down as chief justice. The tide of change is coming to this country. We will finally live up to our highest ideals of liberty and justice for all. We will no longer privilege one religion over another in this nation. We will no longer privilege one class of people over another in this nation. We will no longer privilege one gender over another or one sexual orientation over another. We will no longer privilege one race over another in this nation. Those days are coming to an end. May they come quickly for people are suffering injustices in this land.
Rev. Fred L Hammond, MS, MDiv
Minister of the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Tuscaloosa
on May 1, 2016 at 6:02 pm Comments (11)
Tags: Alabama, Ambrosia Starling, Chief Justice Roy Moore, freedom of religion, Justice, Obergefell v Hodges, same sex marriage as religious freedom, Same-sex marriage, Unitarian Universalism
Our congregation is in the midst of our annual stewardship campaign. We had a well attended kick-off dinner, in fact it was the best attended kick-off dinner in recent history. One would think such attendance would bode well for this year's budget. Those who consistently pledge annually have turned in their pledges for this next year. We are now at the stage of follow-up calls for this year's pledges.
The presentation at the dinner was powerful. We spoke to the four pillars** that enables our congregation to live our mission of being an open, nurturing community of Unitarian Universalists made visible by our actions to create a better world. We spoke to the fact that last year 25% of our pledges were made by two members. And that 20 of our potential 71 pledging units did not make any pledge last year. These two statistics point to an unhealthy fiscal picture. Our push this year is to have every member turn in a pledge form with some level of support.
One of the things I did not want to do this year was to promise all the things we would be able to do with increased resources only to then discover we have to cut our budget because the pledges simply did not meet the promise. We have received most of the pledges that we normally receive without prodding. We are now in the reminding stage of calling our members to turn in their pledges so we can create our budget.
I am already seeing that we have made a tactical mistake in our stewardship campaign this year. I am hoping to offer a corrective.
Two true stories to illustrate that mistake.
There was a small congregation of under a 100 members who had a part time minister whose salary was covered by one member. The other members pledged minimal amounts if at all. The message that the minister received by this was that the congregation really did not want a minister. They liked the idea of a minister. But they did not want a minister because if they had they would pledge the funds needed to support a minister. So the minister suggested to the member to donate the funds instead to the congregation's building fund and not to the operating budget. When the congregation was told they would not be able to keep the minister the following year because they had no money, they were stunned. They exclaimed, but we have always been able to afford a minister with our level of pledging. The minister replied, they had a minister because they allowed one member to carry all of their obligations. If they want a minister, they each must support that ministry with a pledge that reflects that support.
There was another congregation, even smaller than the first who rented their meeting space for about $200 a month. Their annual budget was about $5,000. The members stated they wanted to grow their congregation in order to have a minister but could not afford one given their budget. Their median pledge was about $15 a month. A consultant told them if they wanted to grow their congregation then they would need to increase their financial pledges to reflect their desire to grow.
Both of these congregations missed the mark. A minister is not what makes a church. It is the ministry of the congregation that makes the church. A minister is only a resource of that ministry. The first chose not to support the ministry that they potentially had at their doorsteps with their minister. Yes, their salary was paid but they did not support any resources to build a ministry that would make a difference in their community. The minister's hands were tied from doing the necessary things to build that ministry.
The other congregation funded their reality not their vision. Again, it is the ministry that needed support not the rent, not the office supplies. If all that is desired is a social club where people gather for a talk and coffee on Sunday mornings, then a budget of $5,000 serves that need very nicely. But if the congregation wants to be known in the community as a vibrant community of faith where people live their Unitarian Universalist values into the world and make a significant push to create a better world for the people in the neighborhood, then they need to fund the vision of the ministry they are building to help manifest that vision into a new reality. They needed to fund resources to build that vision.
There is a long list of things that our congregation would like to be able to do this next year. We want to increase our leadership development. We want to increase our participation in denominational affairs. We want to increase our infrastructure with an administrator assistant and bookkeeper, thereby freeing up our volunteers to being able to build up the faith. We want to offer more programs to address the spiritual needs of our members.
But it is not this list of things that we seek funding, we are seeking funding for the ability to change the landscape of our society here in Alabama. A landscape where systems of oppression are in full force. Where mean-spirited legislation is passed that maims and cripples the hearts and wills of people. Everyday, some new legislation is passed that causes new suffering in the lives of people in our congregation and in the larger community.
We are seeking funding for the ability to heal those hearts within this community of faith. We gather on Sundays and at other times to listen to the stories of our lives in order to know that we are not alone. We gather to create community by getting to know one another. We gather to be that balm in Gilead to heal and strengthen each other in order for us to go back out into the community to live our values into being.
In order to have this come to pass, we need to fund a ministry. It is not funding a minister. It is not funding a director of religious educator. It is not funding an administrator or custodian or even nursery care worker. Yes, these are important but these are only resources to build the ministry of the church. The ministry transcends the physical reality of brick and mortar and staff. The ministry seeks to build a new way of being in the world.
As a member of a Unitarian Universalist congregation, you committed to help build this new way, therefore the congregation needs you to honor your commitment by making a pledge of financial support to the best of your ability so there are resources to build the ministry. Fund the vision of the ministry not where the congregation is currently, not the immediate need.
Don't tie the hands of the ministry by withholding your financial pledge. This is your ministry, your work in the world through a community of faith. Not making a financial pledge hurts the congregation in ways perhaps unseen at first, but made visible over time.
** In our congregation we have categorized the work of the church into four pillars: Finance and Operations, Building Community, Spiritual Growth and Development, and Social Justice. There are various teams and work groups that each pillar includes and each pillar requires funding resources. If any one of these pillars were missing, then our ministry would not be able to live our mission. Not being able to fund any one of these pillars sufficiently, hurts our ability to live our mission.
on February 25, 2016 at 2:12 pm Comments Off on Funding The Vision
Tags: church finances, funding ministry, funding vision, Ministry, Stewardship campaigns, Unitarian Universalism
When Confronted with Unbridled Fear
I have only one response: Love one another.
Let me say that in another way: Be gentle with one another.
Let me say that in another way: Be mindful with one another.
Let me say that in another way: Respect one another.
Let me say that in another way: Honor each other's dignity.
Let me say that in another way: Hold on to one another.
Let me say that in another way: Forgive one another.
Let me say that in another way: Be fully present with one another.
Let me say that in another way: Show compassion to one another.
Let me say that in another way: Recognize each other's humanity.
Let me say that in another way: Be fabulous with one another.
Let me say that in another way: Namaste.
Let me say that in another way: Treat others as you want to be treated.
And if I haven't been extremely clear in what I mean,
perhaps these words from Kurt Vonnegut will be helpful:
"God damn it, you've got to be kind."
In other words, Love one another.
(c) 2015 Fred L Hammond
Tags: Fear, Kurt Vonnegut, love one another, Unitarian Universalism
The following is the sermon I gave on September 12, 2015, at the installation service of Rev. Lynn Hopkins, minister of the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Montgomery in Alabama. May it help inform our faith and help us set the direction for the prophetic witness we are called to in such a time as this.
Text: Esther 4:13-14
We have the story of Esther in the Hebrew Scriptures. Born of lowly birth to a Jewish family, there was not much promise for her status in life. She did have one thing in her favor. She was beautiful. The king becomes enamored by her and marries her. But the king also has an adviser who hates the Jews so much that he convinces the king to have them killed. Esther feels distressed and also helpless in this situation since she is not the esteemed first wife of the king. But her uncle, Mordecai says to her, "Do not think that because you are in the king's house you alone of all the Jews will escape. For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance for the Jews will arise from another place, but you and your father's family will perish. And who knows but that you have come to your royal position for such a time as this?"
For such a time as this. Haunting words for Esther to engage her destiny and find a way to entice the king to give her an audience and perhaps save her people.
And have we come to our royal position for such a time as this? Our faith as Unitarian Universalists for nearly 300 years has enjoyed the royal position of privilege—white privilege, white supremacy, class privilege. Our spiritual ancestors not only helped create this nation of white supremacy and privilege but some even held the highest office in the land. Some have been seen as prophets—William Ellery Channing, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, Theodore Parker; even as these individuals whose legacies revolutionized Unitarian faith they did so from the framework of white supremacy and white privilege of their day.
Their lives were imbued in class privilege, in white privilege, in white supremacy which continued to influence the direction the Unitarian faith was to follow. And it is that unfortunate legacy that led later White Unitarians to view their liberalism and progressivism as holding them at a safe distance in an enclaved haven. They saw themselves as being that beacon on a hill, high above all the rest. While some deplored the injustices in society, Unitarians, for the most part, were content in their position of privilege. They were arrogant and haughty.
This was evident in the decisions that our American Unitarian Association made regarding people of color who wanted to become ministers of our faith. Examine the sometimes brutal responses the AUA gave to the vision of Rev. Elthered Brown who founded a Harlem based Unitarian Church and the subdued support to Rev. Lewis McGee and his congregation in Chicago. And it wasn't just the Unitarians, examine the dismissive and arrogant regard the Universalists gave Rev. Joseph Jordan and then his daughter, Annie Willis in their work in providing an education to African Americans in Virginia.
Our history in standing on the side of love has not always been consistent in terms of dealing with our own complicity in racism.
Today, we like to proclaim that we were good in the early 1960's when pointing the finger at those white supremacists during the Civil Rights movement but we would rather forget that we were not so good when Black Unitarian Universalists began to hold White Unitarian Universalists accountable to our own inbred racism in the late 1960s. We have struggled as a faith denomination with coming to terms with our own white privilege and our propensity to use white supremacy to our advantages. But the process to become not only anti-racist but non-racist in our heart of hearts is going to take an individual commitment of all of our members.
We have seen in recent years, how merely acknowledging the issue is not sufficient to uprooting the weeds of white supremacy in the field planted with Unitarian Universalism. We need to recognize how the wheat, oats, and barley that are also planted in the field support and aid the weeds to flourish. If we are unable to own our complicity, individually and collectively, then we will continue to miss the mark of becoming the prophethood of all believers that we know can be our destiny. James Luther Adams knew this required "something like conversion, something more than an attitude." People in our communities need to know that we are the people of the covenantal promise of love made real.
It means we have to become comfortable with confessing our own white privilege and feelings of white supremacy. It is no longer good enough to have an intellectual understanding of white privilege and white supremacy as it is displayed in this nation. It is no longer enough to declare we give money to black causes or declare our scorn at those who fly the confederate flag. We need to have a heart understanding of what every black person in America already knows. It means we are going to have to begin living our values in ways we have yet to imagine. It may challenge us. It may seem uncomfortable but when has deepening spiritual awareness and transformation of lives ever comfortable?
We need to develop a spiritual practice of comfortability. Comfortability is a portmanteau of two words combined to create a new word. I define the word as having the ability to be willing to embrace the feeling of being uncomfortable in situations in order to confront a held bias or prejudice. In the context of being confronted on racism, it means not being defensive or deflective in response but able to be held accountable to our complicity with white privilege and white supremacy and then using that skill to transform our hearts and change our behavior.
The spiritual practice of comfortability was recently described by another Unitarian Universalist, Annie Gonzalez Milliken in her blog post entitled, Spiritual Practices for White Discomfort. She lists these possible steps towards the skill-set needed for comfortability.
Sit with the discomfort and acknowledge it with mindful meditation, the art of breathing in and breathing out. Instead of judgment turn judgment into a curiosity. "Where is my discomfort coming from and what can I learn about myself?" In other words take some time for introspection. Read up on the subject—find out the social context for the action taken that caused our discomfort. Process our emotions with other committed allies privately. Focus on the big picture. Practice deep listening and keep quiet. Unitarian Universalists love to share opinions but that is expressing our own sense of privilege and is not always helpful. In fact such sharing before we have fully processed our own stuff can result in deflection away from the focus of ending racism. When people of color spend their energy answering white discomfort it can be 'especially draining.'
White liberals, all whites regardless of political stripe, need to develop the ability to sit in discomfort of how the system whites created serves to oppress, demean, and destroy Black Lives and other people of color. White Liberals need to recognize how they continue to benefit from this system even when putting on the mantle of being progressives with anti-racist rhetoric. White privilege protects white liberals from these feelings of discomfort.
I have heard some white liberals declare their protestations when confronted with supporting the system of white privilege and white supremacy, to deflect ownership by stating their support of petitions, giving money, marching in unity marches, and having friendships with people of color.
All of these actions are good in and of themselves but these actions become distancing tactics meant to make ourselves feel good when confronted with our complicity. They mean very little if we are not also on the vanguard confronting the system that gives one group protection over and above another group.
We have hid behind our principles without living the spirit of our principles. When Black Lives Matter banners are displayed, the cry from some of our Unitarian Universalist members point to our principle of inherent worth and dignity of every person therefore, the logic goes: all lives matter. This is a deflection because All Lives Matter is the idealized dream but Black Lives Matter is the living reality that they should yet do not. It is a painful reminder that in our society today, we have the walking dead. These are the people who are seen in society as already dead socially so when they die physically, there is no further loss felt. How does a nation grieve the loss of someone who is already dead to society?
But it isn't just Black lives that are socially dead. The mentally ill are socially dead. The elderly are socially dead. The poor are socially dead. The disabled are socially dead. And now that our society has found the slaughtering of children bearable because our nation has placed 2nd amendment rights as more important than the lives of our children, our children are socially dead.
When the walking dead begin to resurrect and claim their voice; whites with privilege, whites with power, whites who bask in the benefits of white supremacy become nervous and uncomfortable. There is a scramble to enact laws to keep them dead. Voting ID laws, gerrymandering voting districts, laws to prevent municipalities enacting minimum wage standards, laws to limit or destroy unions, welfare reforms, all are geared towards disenfranchisement and all to keep the socially dead, dead. Don't believe me? Look where we slash our budgets on the state and federal levels?
Medicaid, Mental health services, Aid to families, education services, children services, food stamps. These cuts are allowed because these people are not valued, their lives do not matter. When we are not outraged when a mentally ill person wielding a serving spoon is shot by police because the police officer feared for his life at a distance of 24 feet; when we are not outraged when a Black person is shot and killed at a simple traffic stop; when we are not outraged when Medicaid is cut and lives are lost then we declare these people already dead in society. We do not fund the dead. The only thing left for them is to be buried.
What does our faith call us to do? It certainly does not call us to huddle in our predominant white congregational havens where we can wag our fingers and heads at those outside these doors who shoot Black Lives with impunity. No, our faith calls us to love mercifully, to act with justice, and to walk humbly in our place in the universe. This is not a time to act all high and mighty and laud our liberal faith of acceptance yet do nothing to create substantive change.
It is a time to speak up boldly on behalf of those who have lost their voice or are having their voices constricted. It is a time to stand on the side of love not just along the side of the road in picket line formation but in the office, in the park, in the grocery store, in the daily interactions we have with everyone we meet. Our being in covenantal relationship does not end once we leave these hallowed halls. Rather it begins. It is time to be an anti-racist anti-oppression faith, not just in the ideal pretty words on a page, but in the hard daily reality.
It comes to this. Our faith does not require that we all believe in the same God or in any God. Our faith does not require that we profess a creed of doctrines that would enable us to enter the gates of heaven. Our faith does require us to love one another as we love ourselves in the here and now. Our faith does require us to be stubbornly determined in loving life into society's socially dead—because black lives matter.
That is our resurrection miracle. Lazarus, a black man, raised from the dead is now seen as crucial to the prosperity and general welfare of the entire community. To remove the blindness from the eyes of those who would oppress to suddenly see Lazarus's inherent worth and dignity as vitally connected to their own inherent worth. Lazarus's resurrection and liberation is tied into our liberation and resurrection. We cannot be fully alive and liberated without the liberation of Black Lives.
These are the times in which we are found. Do not think that because you are in a white liberal and progressive faith, that you alone of white liberals will be protected from being held accountable. For if you remain silent in the crisis facing Black Lives, relief and deliverance for liberation will arise from another place, but this faith will be found irrelevant and will vanish from society. And who knows if you have come to this faith for such a time as this?
on September 14, 2015 at 12:55 pm Comments Off on For Such A Time as This
Tags: anti-racism, Black Lives Matter, Civil rights movement, comfortability, Inherent Worth and Dignity, James Luther Adams, Medicaid Cuts, minimum wage reform, Prophethood of all Believers, Racism, socially dead, The Walking Dead, Unitarian Universalism, Unitarian Universalist history, Unitarian Universalist Principles, voting ID, Voting laws, white discomfort
Alabama Legislature: Doesn't care about Babies or Grandma
I have now lived in Alabama seven years. My 7th anniversary serving as minister of the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Tuscaloosa was August 1st. In that time period, I have been arrested twice for standing up against Alabama's injustice to its citizens. The first was regarding their draconian anti-immigrant law which was gutted of most of its punch by SCOTUS. The second was to call attention to thousands of Alabamians who fall into the gap between Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. We need Medicaid Expansion in this state. Lives are at stake. Lives have been lost needlessly because they could not access the medical care needed to save their lives. Medicaid expansion will create jobs in the tens of thousands. Medicaid expansion will save the lives of loved ones who cannot now receive life saving treatment.
This week the Alabama legislation has been meeting in special session allegedly to fix the budget deficit that will cripple Alabama even further if new revenues are not found. How does Alabama respond? With a $156 million cut to the state's Medicaid budget. This vote will sign the death warrant, not just for hospitals in rural and inner city areas, but for the thousands of people who will be kicked off of Medicaid. The federal government matches state funds for Medicaid at a ratio of 2:1. This cut will in reality be closer to $460 million. "If Alabama chooses not to have a Medicaid system, you will see an impact on the health care system you can only begin to imagine in your worst dreams," said Dr. Don Williamson.
Alarmist? No, he is just stating the facts of what a massive cut will do to this state which is already among the highest in poverty and unemployment in the nation.
FIFTY-THREE PERCENT of all births in Alabama are paid by Medicaid. OF ALL BIRTHS. Our Legislators, who are adamant in their proclamation of being pro-life for the fetus, are condemning mothers-to-be to early 20th century birthing practices that resulted in high mortality rates for both mother and child. We are talking about LIVES here. In this state mid-wives assisting home deliveries are illegal. Not to mention that the only type of mid-wives allowed are the 20 nurse-midwives in the state and they must practice in a hospital. So what this Medicaid cut is really doing is sending Alabama even further back than early 20th century birthing practices because mid-wives are not allowed. Imagine the extraordinary cost paid by taxpayers of an emergency room delivery because a mother cannot receive Medicaid to receive the pre-natal and birth services from within the hospital.
SIXTY PERCENT of all seniors in nursing facilities are having their care paid by Medicaid. The Nursing homes will not survive such cuts to their funding. This is your grandmother and grandfather which the state has voted to throw onto the streets. Are you able to take them in and provide for their care? Are you going to be able to quit your job to ensure that Grandma is safe at home? Their 24/7 needs dictated a safe place where their physical and medical needs are met, which is why you chose a nursing home in the first place. Now they will not be able to afford this care and where will they go?
There are other people who depend on Medicaid for their health concerns such as people living with developmental disabilities, people living with other physical and mental disabilities. What will happen when Medicaid is no longer available to sustain their lives at home with home health aides?
This special session is to come up with a sustainable budget with increased revenue to cover the deficit. There are several possibilities as to where that revenue might be raised. A cigarette and vapor tax was proposed and defeated. A lottery. A 5 cent per gallon gasoline tax. Revamping the 70 year old tax code to meet the modern day economy. Raise the income tax. Eliminate corporate subsidies and tax loop holes. This is where the debate should be in the legislature. Instead, they are wasting our time and tax dollars introducing new bills that have no relationship on balancing the budget at all.
Alabama is sending a strong message to the citizens of this state: You are throw away people. If you agree with this statement then do nothing about this stance the Alabama House has taken. If, however, you believe you have dignity and worth and should be respected to be able to live your life to your fullest potential, then you need to write, protest, get arrested if need be to let Alabama Legislators know that they were elected to do a job. That job is to do what is best for the people of Alabama. Eliminating Medicaid is not in our best interest and NOT ACCEPTABLE. WRITE your legislators, PROTEST at rallies, GET ARRESTED in civil disobedience actions but this treatment of the people of Alabama is unconscionable and offensive to high heaven.
on August 5, 2015 at 2:12 pm Comments Off on Alabama Legislature: Doesn't care about Babies or Grandma
Tags: AL Representative Clouse, Alabama Budget 2015, Hospital closures in Alabama, Medicaid Cuts, Medicaid Expansion, Nursing Home closures in Alabama, Unitarian Universalism
The Spider who Weaves Her Web
I sometimes wonder about the spider who weaves her web.
She knows it is a fragile net between two blades of grass.
She knows wind, rain or even a passerby may destroy
her work and she will begin all over again to weave,
To toil, to struggle to pull the blades of grass together
as an anchor to hang her masterpiece, her life's mission.
How often is the work we do as fragile like a web;
the slightest breeze can make our common desire seem for naught.
We seek to create a web of interdependence but
so afraid of vulnerability required to build;
still we begin, then a storm blows shaking the filaments
of community loose and we find the web is unhinged.
But when it comes together; when the spiral weavings match
the light of a joyous day, revealing the rainbows of comfort
the purpose of the web is fulfilled; sustaining, nurturing,
freeing us to more than we can ever be by ourselves.
The spider weaves the best web she can for today's concerns
and those who come after her will build their webs for their needs
and for their journey's concerns. And that is as it should be.
We, too, weave the best today. Tomorrow we build anew.
© Fred L Hammond 2015
on May 19, 2015 at 10:12 am Comments Off on The Spider who Weaves Her Web
Tags: Beloved Community, meditation, Poems about Spiders, Poetry, Unitarian Universalism
What's a Mother to Do?
Toya Graham, mother of six, sees son on the Baltimore news throwing rocks at police cars, tracks him down, and smacks him several times in the head for his behavior. A bystander videotaped this altercation and it went viral on social media and picked up on national TV.
Many praised her actions as Mother of the year for teaching her son that rioting is wrong. But to hear her say it, the real motivation was "That's my only son, and at the end of the day, I don't want him to be a Freddie Gray. "
Freddie Gray is the young man whose spinal cord was severed while being transported by police after an arrest. Gray died a few days later. His death sparked protests and riots in several sections of Baltimore's poorest neighborhoods. For a mother to live with fear that her son may end up dead like Freddie Gray at the hands of the police, is a fear that no mother should have to live with in her daily life.
What's a mother to do? About a year ago, she heard gun shots outside her West Baltimore house and found a person who had been shot and left for dead. Her neighborhood is filled with violence. She reports she tries to keep him home but now that he is 16, she knows she can't do that as often any longer.
West Baltimore is a poor area of the city. The per capita median income is 35% less than the Baltimore average and 56% less than the state's average. 24% of the Black population is living in poverty. Unemployment is in the double digits and while it is down this past month to 11.5%, unemployment rate among black youth is at 16.1%, triple the national average. 60% of those over age 25 do not have a highschool diploma or GED. Life expectancy is 20 years less than other neighborhoods in Baltimore. A third of the properties are vacant or abandoned. This is the reality that she and her family face every day. This is the larger context to the Black Lives Matter movement. It isn't just the police shootings of unarmed black men, it is the whole picture of the social landscape in which they breathe and have their being.
The New York Times has been publishing online a series of short documentaries entitled Conversations. There are two that I want to mention here. The first one I watched was about growing up Black. It focused on Black male youth sharing their experiences of racism. The youngest was 10 the oldest was in their 20s. One youth tells the story of walking down the street with his white friend and seeing a group of black teens walking towards them, the white friend suggests crossing over to the other side of the street. Another youth states that he will cross the street if he notices white people having a terror in their eyes as he approaches them. One wife describes all male teens and adults as potentially being seen by whites as a large scary black man. Her husband interrupts; I am not a large scary black man. One young man spoke about attending his school that was in two buildings and being stopped by police while walking to class from one building to the other. He expressed his shame and embarrassment he felt as his white student peers would walk pass him. This was not a onetime event, but one that happened several times. He was told the police were there to make him feel safe. He asks, "How can I feel safe when I feel like I am being hunted?"
The other short film was about parents having the "conversation" with their Black son. In white families, the 'conversation' usually refers to sexual behavior and responsibility but in these families the conversation is about how to act when, emphasis on when, police stop you. A father tells the story of placing and keeping his hands on the steering wheel in order to keep the police from becoming nervous about him and realizing that same action made his children in the back seat nervous and scared. A mother states, "It's maddening that I have to prepare my kids for something that they are not responsible for." Another parent instructs her children, "Under no circumstances are you to talk/ask questions to a police officer if stopped."
To have this conversation be the norm in African American families is a terrifying prospect to fully grasp. It counters the white experience in this nation where whites are taught that the police are your friends and if ever in trouble, a police officer can help. Because whites typically do not have this experience with police, many are incredulous when they hear this reality for Blacks.
This is not a new phenomenon in America. This is not something that only began happening when Michael Brown was shot or Eric Garner was strangled. The Black Lives Matter movement is not reflecting on a new never before heard of act of aggression by police. Unfortunately this is a generational issue that dates back hundreds of years.
The issues faced by the black community in the 1870s after the civil war, in the early 1900s, and the 1960s are the same issues that are being faced today in 2015. In the 1870s and early 1900s, the police and vigilantes used lynchings to send a message to the black community; today we use the police and excessive force to the point of death to do the same. And when they are killed there is an immediate vilification and demonization of the victim to convince the public that somehow this death was justified. That somehow in this instance, the police officer had no choice but to shoot, or to hold the person in a choke hold, or slam the person to the ground and kneeing them in the back preventing them to breathe.
The riots that broke out in Ferguson and Baltimore as heinous as they are in their destruction of property and people's livelihood; they too have a context in which they develop. Martin Luther King, Jr. gave that context:
It is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard.
I stated earlier the conditions of Toya Graham's neighborhood of West Baltimore; the high unemployment rate, the high poverty rate, the violence that is already rampant in the streets. These factors have the effect of keeping people trapped in poverty. It does not help to have a system in place to also keep them there.
Alabama State Senator Smitherman stated recently in a public hearing that Alabama is one shooting away from making Baltimore look like a kindergarten outing. The issue of racism and excessive force by police is not just in cities like Baltimore, New York, and Ferguson but also throughout the south.
Here in the south we have statues and schools commemorating civil war leaders who fought to keep the slave economy intact. The statues around the Capitol building commemorates confederate soldiers. It must be painful to be reminded that this state wanted to keep African Americans in shackles. Imagine being a black youth attending a school named for Jefferson Davis or Robert E. Lee. How must it feel to know that the school you are attending is honoring someone who wanted your family to remain uneducated and in slavery? Or to have the Alabama history lessons still honor Jefferson Davis as a great statesman and to honor his treason with a state holiday?
It does not help that Former President Jimmy Carter, a southerner, along with Congress officially pardoned him and restored him to full citizenship in 1978 posthumously. Davis had the opportunity for a pardon while he was alive if he applied for one, but is quoted to have said, to ask for a pardon would require repentance, and he hadn't repented. There is no reconciliation for a person who did not see they had done anything wrong or immoral. Slavery is immoral. And to exonerate Jefferson Davis sends the message that it was okay after all.
Using excessive force against an unarmed person, especially when they are being compliant to police requests, is immoral. There was a recent video where the young black man under his own volition is in the process of getting down on the ground and a police officer runs up and kicks him in the face, breaking his jaw. This was not justified behavior, even if the person had run away from the cop moments before, it is not justified nor is it moral.
There were two commemorations happening in Selma this year. Bloody Sunday was 50 years ago at the height of the civil rights movement and the Battle of Selma, 150 years ago with the reenactment of that battle on the heels of the Bloody Sunday commemoration. At the reenactment, the KKK and other white supremacist groups were out in full number. Imagine how the predominantly black community of Selma felt to have the KKK once again at their doorsteps proudly waving their confederate flags for an era that while it must not be forgotten, needs to be placed into a new narrative of creating justice and liberty for all Alabama's citizens. Instead it glorifies the confederacy and its rebellion against the Federal government.
This is the context in which the black community lives and breathes. To say racism is dead or is diminishing because we have elected to the highest office in the land an African American contrasts the vast unevenness of civil rights in this country.
So what is a mother to do? Julia Ward Howe in 1870 called on mothers around the globe to unite for peace and to help prevent the sending of our children to war. That declaration became the advent of Mother's Day. Somehow the protest, the anger, and grief over the loss of young lives that gave birth to Mother's Day has been reformed into a quaint hallmark card and flowers.
However, yesterday Julia Ward Howe's proclamation was again brought to the forefront. Valerie Bell , who lost her son, Sean, on his wedding day, when police fired 50 shots into his car because they thought the occupants had guns but none of them did, joined Mothers for Justice United; a group of women and family members who have lost young men and women to police violence. She writes:
This year we are taking back the original intention of Mother's Day: a day founded for mothers to stand up together to make collective demands. After the Civil War and the economic turmoil that followed, American abolitionist Julia Ward Howe, horrified by the wars and devastation of her time, penned a proclamation to mothers everywhere: "Our husbands will not come to us, reeking with carnage, for caresses and applause," she wrote. "Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn all that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy and patience… From the bosom of the devastated earth a voice goes up with our own. It says: Disarm, disarm!"
Howe called on women to "promote the alliance of the different nationalities, the amicable settlement of international questions, the great and general interests of peace."
It's now a century after the founding of Mother's Day, and our sons are still being taken from us. Society has not disarmed, but militarized to the teeth. Mothers' sons everywhere are still killing and being killed. We have had enough.
Yesterday Valerie Bell and other mothers of slain young black men marched in DC to bring attention to their grief and loss. It is not just the few that have made the headlines in recent months that they were protesting. The numbers are staggering.
Between 2010 and 2012, black teens were 21 times more likely to be shot and killed by police than white teens. In order for white teens to be of equal risk, it would require an additional 185 young white teens to be killed during that same time period or 1 additional death a week. The disparity does not stop there. Drug use among whites and blacks are about the same percentage. However, blacks in 2013 data collected by the FBI were 4 times more likely to be arrested for drug use than whites.
For me to stand here and tell you that the system is broken and needs fixing does not bring justice to this American tragedy. It is safe for me to speak. It is safe for me because I am at a distance from this reality. And many of you are also at a distance from this reality that is the nature of our social placement in society as Unitarian Universalists. We are considered a white liberal faith that can safely protest within our four walls, maybe sign a few petitions, and if we are brave, maybe join a rally to shake our fists in the air. But many of us won't even do that much, we will shake our heads at this sad state of affairs and when this service is over return to our lives, celebrate Mother's Day with our wives, mothers, and children and have a nice dinner.
But until we decide to listen and honor the first hand stories of people of color in our congregations and in our communities, our in-house actions are meaningless. Our declaring only to each other that we are white allies is really a vapid experience with no ability to make a difference other than to claim separation from those racists. We need to find a way to have heart awareness, a deep empathy that will call us to action, to speak up when our white co-workers proclaim that Freddie Gray got what he deserved or that Michael Brown was guilty or that young 12 year old Tamir Rice should have known better than to be black and playing with a toy gun on his property. Or when our white co-workers mention Brian Moore and other police officers shot and killed in the line of duty as a defense of police actions, we need to stand up and say the death of an officer does not justify the deaths of unarmed black men. This is not quid pro quo killings.
We must begin applying pressure on the system to create change so the deaths in the process of arresting someone ends. There is no call for police to kick a person in the face breaking his jaw. There is no need to shoot a shopper in Walmart because he picked up a toy gun. We need to have as much passion as Toya Graham who would go out in the middle of a raging riot and grab her son by the neck to pull him to safety. What would a mother do to save her children from harm?
What would you do, if you lived in her shoes?
Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Tuscaloosa
10 May 2015 © Rev Fred L Hammond
on May 10, 2015 at 3:07 pm Comments Off on What's a Mother to Do?
Tags: Alabama, anti-racism, Battle of Selma commemoration, Black Lives Matter, Bloody Sunday commemoration, Eric Garner, Freddie Gray, Jefferson Davis Holiday, Julia Ward Howe, Justice, Michael Brown, Mother's Day, Mothers for Justice United, Racism, Sean Bell, Tamir Rice, Toya Graham, Unitarian Universalism
Alabama Lives Matter!
Alabama lives Matter! But you wouldn't know this to be true if you consider the actions and behaviors of our state legislators or governor. It is time for the people of Alabama with a united voice to rise up and tell our state legislators and our governor that their behaviors and actions are placing Alabama lives in harms way. Case in point is the continual blockage of medicaid expansion by the State's Senate and House Republicans as well as Governor Bentley, who ironically is a medical doctor who should know his Hippocratic oath. The Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, allows for the expansion of Medicaid to cover those individuals who 1) do not qualify for current medicaid provisions in their state by raising those eligible for Medicaid to 133% of the federal poverty level and 2) covers those individuals who although are working do not meet the eligibility threshold of the Affordable Care Act. In Alabama that would cover an additional 300k lives.
The Senate recently passed a resolution forbidding Governor Bentley from expanding Medicaid in the state. It is now before the House and it is presumed it will come up for a vote this coming week. Governor Bentley has opposed Medicaid expansion since the passage of the federal act against the best interests of the people he is elected to serve. However, in recent months he has indicated that he may finally expand Medicaid because doing so would increase revenue into the state and help meet the budgetary shortfall. Notice however, he is not thinking of doing this because it would save Alabamian lives but rather his administration.
Every year up to 700 lives, that is 3 lives every two days, are lost because they were unable to get timely treatment for medical conditions resulting in their death. It has been argued by Governor Bentley and others that no one will be denied health care in Alabama. However, Emergency rooms are not treatment centers for devastating diseases like cancer or diabetes. Women cannot get mammograms in an emergency room visit. Emergency room care is not preventative treatment. And Governor Bentley of all people should know this; his behaviors in response to this life and death crisis is unconscionable.
The cost of providing emergency room services as treatment centers is causing hospitals in poorer economic regions of Alabama to close. Since 2011, the first year that Governor Bentley could have expanded Medicaid in the state, 10 hospitals have closed. There are 12 additional hospitals in the state that are expected to close in the next 12-24 months.
Bullock County in Alabama is one location under the threat of losing their only hospital. This county has 33% of the population below the federal poverty level and the average income for a family of four is $23k. It has the highest illiteracy rate in the state at 34%. Its unemployment rate is currently at 7.1%, not the highest in the state per county but significantly above the state rate of 5.8%. The actions of the State Senate reveal their attitude that the individuals and families of Bullock County are throw-away people, regardless of race. Their lives are not worth saving to our elected officials. This is the same Senate that passed a resolution declaring the personhood of the human fetus (they have been moving towards legislating this theological and religious doctrine into law). We need to tell them their actions regarding Medicaid Expansion are immoral and violate their own self-professed values for the sanctity of life. With poverty this high, the people living here are not going to be able to travel an hour plus to a hospital in a bordering county for emergency care let alone treatment for life threatening diseases. Alabama Lives Matter and it is high time that our state legislators not only know it but act accordingly.
Governor Bentley has campaigned on a promise to create jobs in Alabama. He has spent millions of dollars courting international businesses to set up shops in Alabama and has marginal success but not as much success as Medicaid Expansion would have. According to a study by the University of Alabama, 30,000 new jobs would result from the expansion of Medicaid. The Federal government would pay 100% of the expansion cost for the first three years and then reduce that support to 90% in 2020 and thereafter. 30,000 new permanent jobs, not temporary jobs with no benefits like Mercedes is offering in Vance, AL but permanent jobs that have a huge impact on our economic viability as a state. It is projected that over a period of six years the states gross domestic product would increase by $17 Billion and workers' earnings by $10 Billion. Job creation through Medicaid Expansion literally saves lives but apparently Governor Bentley doesn't understand because he has refused to expand medicaid. Alabama Lives Matter!
Governor Bentley does not need the approval of the State Senate or the State House to expand or deny Medicaid Expansion. He could begin saving lives today by signing the executive order to expand Medicaid. He could do the right thing even if the motive is ensuring his party's continued control of the legislature and not for the least of his brothers and sisters in Christ. He is going to need encouragement to do so and needs to know that Alabama Lives Matter regardless of their religious convictions.
What can you do? If you are able come to the State house on Tuesday, April 28. Moral Monday is having a rally outside the State House at 12 Noon and SOS is having a press conference and prayer vigil on the 3rd floor at 12:30 PM. We need you to voice your desire to save lives in Alabama by expanding medicaid. People are dying because our state legislature prefers playing political games rather than addressing the needs of the people of this state. This needs to stop now. Our silence on this issue is condemning lives to death.
Bring this issue to social media. Social media today has become a viable means to create news stories in the mainstream press. This is a life and death issue that needs to be on the minds of every Alabamian. Repost this blog on your Facebook pages and Twitter. Post other stories about medicaid expansion on Facebook and Twitter as well. If you or a loved one are among the 300K in Alabama falling in the gap without medical insurance tell your story of emergency room visits not being a mode of treating illnesses like cancer and diabetes.
Tweets can be sent to @GovernorBentley with the #AlabamaLivesMatter and #ExpandMedicaid and #alpolitics . The #AlabamaLivesMatter will track how many the tweets this campaign sends out. The hashtags ExpandMedicaid and alpolitics will place these tweets before those who are following this issue in Alabama and elsewhere. Here are few examples:
@GovernorBentley save 700 lives this year by signing on to #ExpandMedicaid #AlabamaLivesMatter #alpolitics
@GovernorBentley Create 30K jobs #ExpandMedicaid #AlabamaLivesMatter #alpolitics
@GovernorBentley #ExpandMedicaid and save 12 rural hospitals from closing #AlabamaLivesMatter #alpolitics
You can also tweet House Speaker Rep. Hubbard @SpeakerHubbard using these same hashtags and encourage him to do the right thing regarding medicaid expansion and not pass the Senate resolution to block Medicaid. Look and see if your state senator or representative is on Twitter or Facebook and let them know that Alabama Lives Matter.
Lives are at stake. We need to send the message loud and strong that Alabama Lives Matter and we will not be silent any longer.
on April 26, 2015 at 12:44 pm Comments Off on Alabama Lives Matter!
Tags: Alabama, Alabama House, Alabama Lives Matter, Alabama Senate, ALpolitics, Bullock County Alabama, Governor Bentley, Hospital closures in Alabama, Job Creation in AL, Justice, Medicaid, Medicaid Expansion, Medical access, Moral Monday Alabama, SOS, Speaker Hubbard, Standing on the Side of Love, state legislators, Unitarian Universalism