Now you might think this just shows that I've given you the wrong definition and that I should come up with some other definition and test it against these cases and try and find something that captures atheistic Judaism, atheistic Hinduism, and atheistic Buddhism as forms of religiosity, but I actually think that that's a bad idea, and the reason I think it's a bad idea is that I don't think that's how
さて皆さんは こう考えるかもしれません 私が単に誤った定義をしているだけなので 別の定義を考えて これらの例に当てはめて検証し 無神論的なユダヤ教や ヒンドゥー教や 仏教を 宗教の形態として 説明できるようにすべきではないかと ただ これはだめな考え方だと思います なぜ だめかというと