translation.en: So finally that brings us to one more idea: If scientists judge evidence collectively, this has led historians to focus on the question of consensus, and to say that at the end of the day, what science is, what scientific knowledge is, is the consensus of the scientific experts who through this process of organized scrutiny, collective scrutiny, have judged the evidence and come to a conclusion about it, either yea or nay.
translation.zh: 最后我们提出了另一个想法： 如果科学家集体评判证据， 这就导致历史学家聚焦在了 “共识”这一问题上， 在最后， 什么是科学， 科学知识是什么， 这是科学专家达成的共识， 他们通过这种组织性的怀疑， 合作的怀疑， 来评判证据 得出结论， 判断正误，