denique ADVPOS qu PRON10NOMSN de PREPABL tabell N11NOMSF recit V11PRESACTIVEIND2P ill PRON61ACCSM christian N21ACCSM cur ADVPOS non ADV et CONJ homicid N11ACCSC si CONJ homicid N11NOMSC christian N21NOMSM cur ADVPOS non ADV et CONJ incest ADJ11NOMSMPOS vel ADVPOS quodcun OTHER que CONJ ali ADJ15NOMSNPOS ess VPAR31VOCSMPERFPASSIVEPPL n PRON53NOMPC cred V31PRESACTIVEIND2P in PREPABL n PRON53DATPC sol N22LOCPN pud V21PRESACTIVEIND3S aut CONJ pig V31FUTACTIVEIND3S ips PRON62DATPX nomin N32LOCPN sceler N32GENPN pronunti V11PRESACTIVEINF0X christian N21NOMSM si CONJ null ADJ13GENSXPOS crimin N32GENSN nomin N32LOCSN re N21NOMSM es V73PRESACTIVEIND3S valde ADVPOS incest ADJ11NOMSNPOS si CONJ sol ADJ13GENSXPOS nomin N32GENSN crimen N32NOMSN es V73PRESACTIVEIND3S
Finally, in reading the charge, why do you call the man a Christian, why not a murderer too, if a Christian is a murderer? Why not incestuous? or anything else you believe us to be? Or is it that in our case, and ours alone, it shames you, or vexes you, to use the actual names of our crimes? If a Christian, with no charge laid against him, is defendant because of a name, how shocking the name must be, if the charge consist of a name and nothing more.
final_alignments\Tertullian_Apology.json