atque CONJ ego PRON51NOMSC sci V41PRESACTIVEIND1S pler ADJ11ACCPMPOS re N21ACCPM alicu PRON10GENSX facinor N32GENSN postulat VPAR11ACCPMPERFPASSIVEPPL si CONJ fu V51PERFACTIVEINF0X qu PRON10NOMPF caus N11GENSF prob V11IMPFPASSIVESUB3P h PRON31NOMSN un NUM11ABLSMCARD s PRON54ABLXC tamen ADVPOS abund ADJ11VOCSMPOS defend V31PERFACTIVEINF0X vit N11ACCSF su ADJ11ACCSFPOS procul ADVPOS ab PREPABL hu PRON31GENSX sceler N32LOCPN abhorr V21PRESACTIVEINF0X nec ADVPOS i PRON41NOMSN s PRON54DATXC ob V51PRESACTIVEINF0X deb V21PRESACTIVEINF0X qu PRON10NOMSN vid V21PRESPASSIVESUB3P qu PRON10NOMPF fu V51PERFACTIVEINF0X ad ADVPOS malefici VPAR31NOMSNFUTPASSIVEPPL invitament N22NOMPN non ADV enim CONJ omn ADJ32NOMPNPOS qu PRON10NOMPF f V33PRESACTIVEINF0X potu V52PERFACTIVESUB3P pro PREPABL fact VPAR31DATPXPERFPASSIVEPPL hab VPAR21NOMSFFUTPASSIVEPPL r N51GENPF vic N33NOMPF vari ADJ11ACCPFPOS even V41PRESACTIVEINF0X cert N22NOMSN indic N31ACCSM cu PRON10GENSX anim N21ACCSM ess VPAR31VOCSMPERFPASSIVEPPL qu PRON10NOMPM semper ADVPOS eodem PRON42ABLSX ingeni N22DATSN ad ADVPOS virtut N31ACCSF vel ADVPOS maliti N11ACCSF morat VPAR11NOMSMPERFPPL firm ADJ11NOMSNPOS argument N22NOMSN es V73PRESACTIVEIND3S accipi VPAR31GENSMFUTPASSIVEPPL crimin N32GENSN aut CONJ respu VPAR31GENSMFUTPASSIVEPPL
And yet I know that many men named as defendants on a criminal charge, even when it could be proved that possible motives existed, have fully cleared themselves by this one argument: that their way of life was wholly inconsistent with such crimes, and it should not count against them if there seemed to have been certain factors tempting them to do wrong. Not everything that might be a fact ought to be considered fact, and different situations can have different outcomes. The sure clue is each mans mind: if its constant nature accustoms it to do good or evil, that is a powerful argument for inferring or rejecting a criminal charge.
final_alignments\Apuleius_Apologia.json