at CONJ si CONJ it VPAR61NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL ut V31PRESINF0X s V51PRESACTIVEIND3P it VPAR61NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL e V11PRESACTIVEIMP2S fut VPAR51NOMSFFUTACTIVEPPL esse V51PRESACTIVEIND3P decern V31PRESACTIVEIND3S ut CONJ aequ ADJ11VOCSMPOS vel ADVPOS f V33PRESACTIVEINF0X e V11PRESACTIVEIMP2S vel ADVPOS non ADV f V33PRESACTIVEINF0X poss V52PRESACTIVEINF0X cognosc V31PRESACTIVESUB3S qu PRON10NOMPF es V73PRESACTIVEIND3S h PRON31NOMSF praesci VPAR31NOMPNPRESACTIVEPPL qu PRON10NOMPF nihil N99XXN cert N22NOMSN nihil N99XXN stabil ADJ32NOMSNPOS comprehend V31PRESACTIVEIND3S
But if he sees that those future things are just as indeed they are, so that he knows that they can equally either happen or not happen, what sort of foreknowledge is this, that grasps nothing certain, nothing stable?
final_alignments\Boethius_Philosophy_Book5.json