cu PRON10DATSX percontation N31LOCSF tu ADJ11GENSFPOS respond V21PRESACTIVEINF0X et CONJ tam ADVPOS magn ADJ11GENSFPOS quaestion N31GENSF pondus N32NOMSN excip V31PRESACTIVEINF0X ut CONJ aut CONJ de PREPABL ingeni N22LOCPN nostr N23LOCPM mal N21VOCSM existim VPAR11NOMSNFUTPASSIVEPPL sit V51PRESACTIVEIND3P si CONJ i PRON42NOMSM adsequ V31PRESINF0X non ADV poss V52PRESACTIVEIND1P aut CONJ de PREPABL iudici N24LOCPN si CONJ nol V62PRESACTIVEIND1P vix ADVPOS hercule INTERJ aud V21IMPFACTIVESUB1S si CONJ m PRON51DATSC me ADJ11NOMSFPOS sententi N11NOMSF profer VPAR32NOMSFFUTPASSIVEPPL ac CONJ non ADV disertissi ADJ00GENPMSUPER ut CONJ nostr N23LOCPM tempor N32LOCPN homin N31GENPM sermo N31NOMSM repet VPAR31NOMSMFUTPASSIVEPPL esset V51PRESACTIVEIND3P qu PRON10ACCPM e PRON42ACCSF h PRON31ACCSF quaestion N31ACCSF tract VPAR11NOMPCPRESACTIVEPPL iuven ADJ32NOMSCPOS admodum ADVPOS audiv V41PERFACTIVEIND1S
To attempt an answer to your conundrum is to take up a difficult investigation, involving this grave dilemma: either it is want of ability that keeps us from rising to the same high standard, in which case we must think meanly of our powers, or it is want of will, and in that event we shall have to condemn our taste. Such an attempt I should really scarce presume to make, if it were my own views that I had to put forward, instead of reproducing a conversation between certain persons'very good speakers, according to our present-day standards'whom I listened to when quite a youth as they held high debate over this very issue.
final_alignments\Tacitus_Dialogus.json