qu PRON10NOMSN si CONJ neque ADVPOS hab V21PRESACTIVEINF0X ut VPAR31GENSMFUTPPL argument N22NOMSN es V73PRESACTIVEIND3S neque ADVPOS non ADV ut VPAR31GENSMFUTPPL non ADV hab V21PRESACTIVEINF0X et CONJ specul N22GENSN non ADV tam ADVPOS possessio N31NOMSF culp V11PRESPASSIVEIND3S qu PRON10ACCSF inspectio N31NOMSF ill PRON61NOMSN etiam CONJ doc V21PRESACTIVESUB2S necesse ADJ99XXXPOS es V73PRESACTIVEIND3S quando ADVPOS et CONJ qu PRON10DATPX praesent ADJ31DATPXPOS in PREPABL specul N22NOMSN inspex V31PERFACTIVESUB1S quoniam CONJ ut CONJ r N51NOMSF es V73PRESACTIVEIND3S mag N21LOCPM piacul N22NOMSN decern V31PRESACTIVEIND2S specul N22NOMSN philosoph N21DATSM qu PRON10ACCSF cer V11PRESPASSIVESUB2S mund N21ACCSM profan ADJ11DATSMPOS vid V21PRESACTIVEINF0X
So, if possession is no proof of use, and nonuse is no proof of nonpossession, and if blame attaches not so much to owning a mirror but to looking at it, you need to show when and in whose presence I looked in the mirror; since as it is, you consider it a greater sin for a philosopher to see a mirror than for someone uninitiated to see Ceres symbols.
final_alignments\Apuleius_Apologia.json