nonne ADVPOS v PRON53DATPC vid V21PRESPASSIVEIND3P h PRON31NOMSF sophist N11GENPM argument N22NOMPN obvers ADJ11NOMSFPOS invicem ADVPOS vic N21VOCSM spin N11GENPF qu PRON10ACCPF vent VPAR34NOMSMPERFPASSIVEPPL convolv V31PERFACTIVESUB3S inter PREPACC s PRON54ABLXC cohaer V21PRESACTIVEINF0X par N31LOCPC utrimque ADVPOS acule N21LOCPM simil ADJ32DATSXPOS penetratio N31NOMSF n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S mutu ADJ11DATSMPOS vulner N32LOCSN atque CONJ ideo ADVPOS merces N31NOMSF Protagorae OTHER tam ADVPOS asper N22NOMPN tam ADVPOS senticosa OTHER versut ADJ11DATPXPOS et CONJ avar N21LOCPM relinqu VPAR31NOMSFFUTPASSIVEPPL est V51PRESACTIVEIND3P cu PRON10DATSX scilicet ADVPOS mult N22DATSN tant ADJ11NOMSFPOS praest V11PRESACTIVEIND3S ill PRON61NOMSF alter ADJ14NOMSFPOS merces N31NOMSF qu PRON10ACCSF Thale OTHER n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S memor V11PRESACTIVEIND3P suas V21PERFACTIVEINF0X
Dont you think that these arguments between two sophists are like tumbleweeds rolled together by the wind? They cling to each other, both of them equally prickly, similarly piercing, mutually wounding? And so Protagoras bargain, though so sharp and thorny, should be left to cheats and misers: better by far, undoubtedly, is that other fee that Thales is said to have proposed.
final_alignments\Apuleius_Florida.json