m ADV qu PRON10ABLSM aemili ADJ11NOMSMPOS scaur ADJ11NOMSMPOS repet VPAR31GENPFFUTPASSIVEPPL re N21NOMSM ade V61PRESACTIVEIND1S perdit VPAR31ACCSFPERFPASSIVEPPL et CONJ complorat VPAR11ACCSFPERFPASSIVEPPL defension N31ACCSF in PREPABL iudic N31GENPM attul V32PERFACTIVEIND3S ut CONJ cum ADVPOS accus V11FUTPASSIVEIMP2S dic V31IMPFACTIVESUB3S leg V31PRESACTIVEIMP2S s PRON54DATXC centum NUM20XXXCARD atque CONJ viginti NUM20XXXCARD homin N31LOCPM denunti V11PRESACTIVEINF0X testimoni N24NOMSN lic V21PRESACTIVEINF0X s PRON54ABLXC que CONJ non ADV recus V11PRESACTIVEINF0X quominus CONJ absolv V31IMPFPASSIVESUB3S si CONJ totidem ADJ99XXXPOS nominav V11PLUPACTIVESUB3S qu PRON10DATPX in PREPABL provinci N11NOMSF nihil N99XXN abstul V32PLUPACTIVESUB3S tam ADVPOS bon N11NOMSF condicion N31LOCSF ut V31PRESINF0X non ADV potu V52PERFACTIVESUB3S
M. Aemilius Scaurus too, on trial for extortion, brought an utterly hopeless defence into court. So much so that when the prosecutor said that under the law he could call one hundred and twenty witnesses and that he would not object to an acquittal if Scaurus named that number of persons in the province from whom he had taken nothing, Scaurus was unable to take advantage of so fair an offer.
final_alignments\Valerius_Memorable_Book8.json