quaes V31PRESACTIVEIND1S qu PRON10NOMSN hab V21PRESACTIVEIND3P ist PRON61DATSX vers VPAR31NOMSMPERFPASSIVEPPL r N51GENSF aut CONJ verb N22DATSN pud VPAR21NOMSNFUTPASSIVEPPL qu PRON10NOMSN omnino ADVPOS qu PRON10NOMSN philosoph N21NOMSM su N21ACCSM nol V62PRESACTIVESUB3S vid V21PRESPASSIVEINF0X nisi CONJ fort N33LOCSF in PREPABL e V11PRESACTIVEIND1S reprehend VPAR31NOMSMFUTPASSIVEPPL sum V51PRESACTIVEIND3P qu PRON10NOMSN calpurnian ADJ11DATSMPOS pulviscul N21ACCSM ex PREPABL arabic N11LOCPF frug N31LOCPF mis V31PERFACTIVESUB1S qu PRON10ACCSM mult N22DATSN aequi ADJ11NOMSNCOMP esse V51IMPFACTIVEIND3S spurcissi ADJ00DATSMSUPER rit N41ABLSM Hiberorum OTHER ut CONJ a V71PRESACTIVEIND3S Catullus OTHER su N22NOMPN s PRON54DATXC urin N11NOMSF dent N33ACCSM atque CONJ russ ADJ11ACCSFPOS pumic V11PRESACTIVEINF0X gingiv N11ACCSF
I ask you, what is shameful about these lines, either in subject or language? Is there anything about them that a philosopher would not wish to be thought his? Unless perhaps I am to be faulted for sending Calpurnianus a powder made from Arabian spices, when it would have been more fitting for him to observe that disgusting custom of the Spaniards. They, in Catullus words, use their own urine To scrape their teeth and reddish gums.
final_alignments\Apuleius_Apologia.json