defensio N31NOMSF in PREPABL ceter ADJ11DATPXPOS trepidav V11PERFACTIVEIND3S nam CONJ neque ADVPOS ambition N31ACCSF milit V11IMPFACTIVESUB1S neque ADVPOS provinci N11ACCSF pessi ADJ00DATSMSUPER cu PRON10DATSX obnoxi ADJ11ACCSFPOS n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S contumeli N11ACCPF quidem ADVPOS advers N21ACCSM imperator N31ACCSM infiti V11PRESINF0X pot V52IMPFACTIVEIND3S sol N22NOMSN venen N22GENSN crimen N32NOMSN vis VPAR21NOMSMPERFPASSIVEPPL est V51PRESACTIVEIND3P dilu V31PERFACTIVEINF0X qu PRON10NOMSN n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S accusator N31NOMPM quidem ADVPOS sat ADJ11DATPXPOS firm V11IMPFACTIVEIND3P in PREPABL convivi N24DATSN germanic N21GENSM cum ADVPOS sup V11PRESPASSIVESUB1S e PRON41ACCSM pis N22DATSN discumb V31IMPFACTIVESUB3S infect ADJ11ACCPMPOS man N41DATPF e PRON41GENSX cib N21ACCPM argu VPAR31NOMPCPRESACTIVEPPL
On all counts but one the defence wavered. There was no denying that he had tampered with the soldiery, that he had abandoned the province to the mercies of every villain, that he had even insulted the commander-in-chief. The single charge which he seemed to have dissipated was that of poisoning. It was, indeed, none too plausibly sustained by the accusers, who argued that, at a dinner given by Germanicus, Piso (who was seated above him) introduced the dose into his food.
final_alignments\Tacitus_Annals_Book3.json