unde ADVPOS ist PRON61NOMSF perversitas N31NOMSF ut CONJ etiam CONJ ill PRON61NOMSN non ADV recogit V11PRESACTIVESUB2P spont N33LOCSF confess N21DATSM mag N21LOCPM cred VPAR31NOMSNFUTPASSIVEPPL esse V51PRESACTIVEIND3P qu PRON10ACCSF per PREPACC v N33ACCSF neg VPAR11DATSXPRESACTIVEPPL vel ADVPOS n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S compuls VPAR31NOMSMPERFPASSIVEPPL neg V11PRESACTIVEINF0X non ADV ex PREPABL fid N51GENSF negav V11PERFACTIVESUB3S et CONJ absolut ADJ11NOMSMPOS ibidem ADVPOS post ADVPOS tribunal N34NOMSN de PREPABL vestr ADJ12NOMSFPOS rid V21PRESACTIVESUB3S aemulatio N31NOMSF n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S iterum ADVPOS christian N21NOMSM cum ADVPOS igitur CONJ in PREPABL omn ADJ32DATPXPOS n PRON53NOMPC aliter ADVPOS dispon V31PRESACTIVEIND2P qu PRON10ACCSF ceter ADJ11ACCPMPOS noc VPAR21NOMPCPRESACTIVEPPL ad ADVPOS un NUM11NOMSNCARD contend VPAR31DATSMFUTPASSIVEPPL ut CONJ de PREPABL e V11PRESACTIVEIND1S nomin N32LOCSN exclud V31PRESPASSIVESUB1P exclud V31PRESPASSIVEIND1P enim CONJ si CONJ faci V31PRESACTIVESUB1P qu PRON10NOMPF faci V31PRESACTIVEIND3P non ADV christian N21GENSM intelleg V31PRESACTIVEINF0X pot V52PRESACTIVEIND2P non ADV scelus N32NOMSN aliqu PRON10NOMSN in PREPABL caus N11NOMSF ess VPAR31VOCSMPERFPASSIVEPPL sed CONJ nomen N32NOMSN qu PRON10NOMSN qu PRON10NOMPF ratio N31NOMSF aemul N11GENSF operation N31GENSF insequ V31PRESIND3S h PRON31NOMSN prim N21ACCSM ag VPAR31NOMSXPRESACTIVEPPL ut CONJ homin N31NOMPM nol V62PRESACTIVESUB3P sc V41PRESACTIVEINF0X pro PREPABL cert N22DATSN qu PRON10NOMSN s PRON54ABLXC nesc V41PRESACTIVEINF0X pro PREPABL cert N22DATSN sci V41PRESACTIVEIND3P
What is the meaning of this confusion? this failure to reflect that more credence is to be given to a voluntary confession than to a forced denial? to reflect that, when compelled to deny, he may not honestly deny; and, once acquitted, he may again after your tribunal laugh at your enmity, once more a Christian? So, when in every detail you treat us differently from all other criminals'as you do in concentrating on the one object of dissociating us from that name (for we are dissociated from it, if we do what men not Christians doa)'you can gather that the gravamen of the case is not any crime but a name. This name, a certain rational agency,b rival in its operation, assails, with the prime motive that men may be unwilling to know for certain, what they certainly know they do not know.
final_alignments\Tertullian_Apology.json