vac VPAR11ABLSXPRESACTIVEPPL autem CONJ merit VPAR21GENSMPERFPASSIVEPPL notiti N11NOMSF unde ADVPOS odi N24GENSN iustiti N11NOMSF defend V31PRESPASSIVEIND3S qu PRON10NOMPF non ADV de PREPABL event SUPINE34ABLSN sed CONJ de PREPABL consci VPAR34NOMPNPRESACTIVEPPL prob VPAR11NOMSFFUTPASSIVEPPL est V51PRESACTIVEIND3P cum ADVPOS ergo ADVPOS propterea ADVPOS od V31PERFACTIVEIND3P homin N31NOMPM quia CONJ ignor V11PRESACTIVEIND3P qual N21VOCSM s V51PRESACTIVESUB3S qu PRON10NOMSN od V31PERFACTIVEIND3P cur ADVPOS non ADV lic V21PRESACTIVESUB3S eiusmodi ADVPOS ill PRON61NOMSN ess VPAR31VOCSMPERFPASSIVEPPL qu PRON10NOMSN non ADV deb V21PRESACTIVESUB3P od V31PERFACTIVEINF0X it VPAR61NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL  ex PREPABL alterutr ADJ14ABLSMPOS redargu V31PRESACTIVEIND1P et CONJ ignor V11PRESACTIVEINF0X ill PRON61ACCPM dum CONJ od V31PERFACTIVEIND3P et CONJ iniust ADJ11VOCSMPOS od V31PERFACTIVEINF0X dum CONJ ignor V11PRESACTIVEIND3P
But so long as nothing at all is known of its deserts, how can you defend the justice of the hatred? That must be established, not on the bare fact of its existence, but on knowledge. When men hate a thing simply because they do not know the character of what they hate, what prevents it being of a nature that does not deserve hate at all? Whichever alternative you choose, we maintain both points: they are ignorant so long as they hate, and their hate is unjust so long as they are ignorant.
final_alignments\Tertullian_Apology.json