et CONJ enim CONJ ut CONJ probabil ADJ32NOMSNPOS argument N22NOMSN ad ADVPOS fid N51ACCSF impl VPAR21ACCSFFUTPASSIVEPPL scienti N11GENSF su ADJ11GENSFPOS i PRON41NOMSN praetend V31IMPFACTIVEIND3P qu PRON10NOMSN et CONJ Maximiano OTHER antehac ADVPOS caesar N31LOCSM cum ADVPOS Narseo OTHER pers N11GENPM reg V31PRESACTIVEIMP2S i V61FUTACTIVEIND1S congress VPAR31DATSMFUTPPL itidem ADVPOS leo N31NOMSM et CONJ aper N23NOMSC ingens ADJ31NOMSXPOS trucidat VPAR11GENSMPERFPASSIVEPPL simul ADVPOS oblat VPAR32NOMPMPERFPASSIVEPPL sunt V51PRESACTIVEIND3P et CONJ superat VPAR11NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL gent N33LOCSF discess V31PERFACTIVEIND3S incolum ADJ32NOMSCPOS ill PRON61ABLSM minime ADVSUPER contempl V11FUTACTIVEIMP2S qu PRON10NOMSN alien N22NOMPN pet VPAR31DATSXPRESACTIVEPPL portend V31IMPFPASSIVEIND3S exiti N24NOMSN et CONJ Narseus OTHER prim N21NOMSM armeni N11ACCSF roman N21DATSM iur N32LOCSN obnoxi ADJ11ACCSFPOS Syncope r=>v.r
They, indeed, advanced as a specious argument for establishing belief in their knowledge, that when the former Caesar Maximianus was already on the point of engaging with Narseus, king of the Persians, in the same way a lion and a huge boar that had been killed were brought to him, and that he came back safely after conquering the enemy. And there was no idea at all that such a portent threatened destruction to the invader of anothers territory, although Narseus had first seized Armenia, which was subject to Roman jurisdiction.
final_alignments\Ammianus_Marcellinus_Book23.json