sic ADVPOS accus V11PRESACTIVEIND2S ut CONJ omn ADJ32NOMPNPOS a ADV re N21DATSM percont V11PRESSUB2S nihil N99XXN ips PRON62NOMSM adfer V32PRESACTIVESUB2S cognit N41ACCSM qu PRON10ACCSF ob PREPACC r N51ACCSF piscis N33NOMSM quaer V31PRESACTIVEIND2S cur ADVPOS aegr ADJ12ACCSFPOS mulier N31ACCSF inspex V31PERFACTIVEIND2S qu PRON10NOMSN in PREPABL sudari N24DATSN habu V21PERFACTIVEIND2S utr N33GENPM tu PRON52NOMSC accusat VPAR11NOMSNPERFPASSIVEPPL an CONJ interrogat VPAR11NOMSNPERFPASSIVEPPL ven V41PERFACTIVEIND2S si CONJ accusat VPAR11NOMSNPERFPASSIVEPPL tut VPAR21VOCSMPERFPPL arg OTHER u N33LOCSF qu PRON10NOMPF dic N11LOCPF si CONJ interrogat VPAR11NOMSNPERFPASSIVEPPL nol V62PRESACTIVEIMP2S praeiudic V11PRESACTIVEINF0X qu PRON10NOMSN fu V51PERFACTIVESUB3S qu PRON10NOMSN ideo ADVPOS t PRON52ABLSC necesse ADJ99XXXPOS es V73PRESACTIVEIND3S interrog V11PRESACTIVEINF0X quia CONJ nesc V41PRESACTIVEIND2S
Is that how you accuse, merely by plying the accused with questions and not producing any known fact yourself? Why do you look for fish? Why did you examine a sick woman? What did you have in the napkin? Did you come here to accuse or to interrogate? If to accuse, prove what you say: if to interrogate, dont presume to know what your ignorance obliges you to ask.
final_alignments\Apuleius_Apologia.json