qu PRON10NOMSN si CONJ it VPAR61NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL est V51PRESACTIVEIND3P cur ADVPOS m PRON51DATSC nov V31PERFACTIVEINF0X non ADV lic V21PRESACTIVESUB3S vel ADVPOS Zalmoxi OTHER bon N11NOMSF verb N22NOMPN vel ADVPOS Zoroastri OTHER sacerdoti N24NOMPN sin CONJ ver N21DATSM mor N21VOCSF vulg V11PRESPASSIVEINF0X e PRON41ACCSM ist PRON61DATSX propri ADJ11VOCSMPOS mag N21ACCSM existim V11PRESACTIVEIND3P qu PRON10NOMPM communi V41PRESACTIVEIND1S n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S loqu VPAR31GENSMFUTPPL cum ADVPOS de N11LOCPF immortal ADJ32DATPXPOS ad ADVPOS omn ADJ32NOMPNPOS qu PRON10NOMPF vel V62PRESACTIVESUB3S incredibil ADJ32DATSXPOS qu PRON10ABLSF u N33LOCSF cantamin N32GENPN poll V21PRESACTIVESUB3S oppid N22DATSN mir V11PRESPASSIVEIND1S cur ADVPOS accus V11PRESACTIVEINF0X non ADV timu V21PERFACTIVESUB3P qu PRON10ACCSM poss V52PRESACTIVEINF0X tant ADJ11NOMSNPOS fat V21PRESIND3P
If that is so, why may not I know Zalmoxis words of beauty or Zoroasters priestly lore? But if those people have the commonplace idea that magician strictly means someone able to fulfill his every wish by spells that have some kind of extraordinary power, I am very puzzled why they are not afraid to accuse someone who they say is so powerful.
final_alignments\Apuleius_Apologia.json