atque CONJ ade V61PRESACTIVEIND1S qu PRON10NOMSN pleni ADJ11NOMSNCOMP dic V11PRESPASSIVESUB2S non ADV occid V31FUTACTIVEIND2S an CONJ doc V21PRESACTIVEINF0X n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S irasc V31PRESSUB2S quidem ADVPOS qu PRON10NOMSN perfecti ADJ00NOMSNCOMP prohib V21PRESACTIVEINF0X adulteri N24NOMSN an CONJ etiam CONJ ab PREPABL ocul N21GENPM solitari N11NOMSF concupisc VPAR31NOMPNPRESACTIVEPPL arc V21PRESACTIVEINF0X qu PRON10NOMSN eruditi ADJ00NOMSNCOMP de PREPABL malefici V31PRESACTIVEIND1S an CONJ et CONJ de PREPABL maliloqui N22DATSN interdic V31PRESACTIVEINF0X qu PRON10NOMSN instructi ADJ11NOMSNCOMP iniuri N11ACCSF non ADV permitt V31PRESACTIVEINF0X an CONJ nec ADVPOS vic N33ACCSF iniuri N11GENSF sin V31PRESACTIVEINF0X dum CONJ tamen ADVPOS sci V41PRESACTIVESUB2P ips PRON62ACCPF leg V31FUTACTIVEIND2S qu PRON10ABLSM vestr ADJ12ACCPFPOS qu PRON10NOMPF vid V21PRESPASSIVEIND3P ad ADVPOS innocenti N11ACCSF perg V31PRESACTIVEINF0X de PREPABL divin V11PRESACTIVEIMP2S leg V31PRESACTIVEIMP2S ut CONJ antiqui ADJ11ABLSXCOMP form N11NOMSF mutuat VPAR11ACCPFPERFPASSIVEPPL
And to come to the point, which is the ampler saying: Thou shalt not kill, or, Do not even be angry? Which is more perfect, to forbid adultery or to prohibit a single lustful look? Which is the deeper law, to restrain from doing evil or from even speaking it? Which is the more thorough, not to permit the doing of an injury or to allow no retaliation? Though at the same time you must recognize that your own laws, which seem to tend to innocence, drew from the divine law, which is the more ancient pattern.
final_alignments\Tertullian_Apology.json