rursus ADVPOS inqu V72PRESACTIVEIND3S si CONJ du NUM12NOMPMCARD s V51PRESACTIVESUB3P qu PRON10DATPX i PRON42NOMSM secund NUM12NOMSNORD nat VPAR31ACCSFFUTPPL proposit VPAR31NOMSNPERFPASSIVEPPL sit V51PRESACTIVEIND3P e PRON41GENPM que CONJ un NUM11NOMSMCARD natural ADJ32DATSXPOS offici V31PRESACTIVEIND1S i PRON41NOMSN ips PRON62NOMSN ag V31PRESACTIVESUB3S atque CONJ perfici V31PRESACTIVESUB3S alt V11PRESPASSIVESUB1S ver N21DATSM natural ADJ32NOMSNPOS ill PRON61NOMSN offici N24NOMSN minime ADVSUPER administr V11PRESACTIVEINF0X que V61PRESACTIVESUB3S ali N24DATSN ver N21DATSM mod N21DATSM qu PRON10ACCSF nat VPAR31GENSFFUTPPL conven V41PRESACTIVEIND3S non ADV quidem ADVPOS impl V21PRESACTIVESUB3S proposit VPAR31NOMSNPERFPASSIVEPPL su N21ACCSM sed CONJ imit V11PRESPASSIVESUB3S impl VPAR21ACCSCPRESACTIVEPPL qu PRON10ACCSM h PRON31GENPM valenti ADJ31ACCSCCOMP ess VPAR31VOCSMPERFPASSIVEPPL decern V31PRESACTIVEIND2S
Again, she said, suppose two men, to whom the same natural action is proposed, and one of them does that same action and completes it by exercising the proper natural function, but the other cannot manage that natural function, but in a manner different from that according to nature does not perform what was proposed to him but imitates the one who does perform it 'which of these two would you decide was the stronger?
final_alignments\Boethius_Philosophy_Book4.json