nam CONJ et CONJ quaestion N31GENSF hu PRON31GENSX ferme ADVPOS medi N24NOMPN ten V21PRESACTIVEIND1P ut CONJ quant ADJ11NOMSNPOS me ADJ11NOMSFPOS opinio N31NOMSF es V73PRESACTIVEIND3S pars N33NOMSF ist PRON61NOMSF posteri ADJ11NOMSCCOMP prae ADVPOS ill PRON61NOMSF graec ADJ11NOMSFPOS qu PRON10NOMPF antevert V31PRESACTIVEIND3S nec ADVPOS argument N22LOCPN s V51PRESACTIVESUB3S effeti ADJ00NOMSCCOMP nec ADVPOS sententi N11LOCPF rari ADJ11NOMSCCOMP nec ADVPOS exempl N22LOCPN pauperi ADJ31NOMSCCOMP nec ADVPOS oratio N31NOMSF n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S defecti ADJ11NOMSCCOMP
For I am about midway through my inquiry, and, in my opinion at least, compared to its Greek predecessor this second part will be no weaker in argument, poorer in illustrations, or inferior in eloquence.
final_alignments\Apuleius_Florida.json