ag V31PRESACTIVEIMP2S i V61FUTACTIVEIND1S si CONJ qu PRON10NOMPM philosoph N21NOMSM adfirm V11PRESACTIVESUB3S ut CONJ a V71PRESACTIVEIND3S Laberius OTHER de PREPABL sententi N11NOMSF Pythagorae OTHER homin N31ACCSM f V33PRESACTIVEINF0X ex PREPABL mul N21DATSM colubr N11ACCSF ex PREPABL mulier N31LOCSF et CONJ in PREPABL e V61PRESACTIVESUB1S opinion N31ACCSF omn ADJ32NOMPNPOS argument N22NOMPN eloqui N24GENSN virtut N31LOCSF distors V21PERFACTIVESUB3S nonne ADVPOS consens N41ACCSM mov V21FUTACTIVEIND3S et CONJ fid N51ACCSF infig V31FUTACTIVEIND3S etiam CONJ ab PREPABL animal N34LOCPN abstin VPAR21GENSMFUTPASSIVEPPL propterea ADVPOS
Come, suppose some philosopher affirm (like Laberiusa talking of Pythagoreanism) that a mule becomes a man, and a woman a snake; suppose that by force of eloquence he twists all the arguments to support that opinion; it will find (wont it?) acceptance, it will implant the conviction that we must on that account abstain from eating animals.
final_alignments\Tertullian_Apology.json