sed CONJ qu PRON10DATPX ante ADVPOS t PRON52ABLSC laud V11PRESACTIVESUB1S ist PRON61ACCSF pecuni N11GENSF praetul V32PERFACTIVEIND3S quot ADJ11NOMSMPOS qu PRON10DATPX princip N31GENPM n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S i PRON41NOMSN quidem ADVPOS in PREPABL patrimoni N24LOCPN nostr N23LOCPM su N21ACCSM dux V31PERFACTIVEIND3S qu PRON10NOMSN es V73IMPFACTIVESUB3S de PREPABL su N21DATSM nonne ADVPOS ut CONJ reg N31GENPM it VPAR61NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL caes VPAR31GENPFPERFPASSIVEPPL muner V11PRESACTIVEIMP2S illit VPAR31ACCPMPERFPASSIVEPPL ci V61FUTACTIVEIND2S ham N21ACCPM opert VPAR34ACCPMPERFPASSIVEPPL praed N11NOMSF laque N21ACCPM aemul V11IMPFPASSIVEIND3P cum ADVPOS priv V11PRESACTIVEIND2P facultat N31LOCPF velut ADVPOS haust VPAR34NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL et CONJ implicit VPAR11NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL retro ADVPOS cum ADVPOS s PRON54ABLXC quidquid PRON10NOMSN attig V31PLUPACTIVEIND3P refer V32IMPFACTIVESUB3P
Yet who before you chose this distinction in preference to additional wealth? How many emperors refused (like you) to consider as theirs even that portion of our patrimony which originally came from them? Is it not true to say that the gifts of emperors like those of kings used to resemble baited hooks or hidden snares, so that once entangled with private fortunes they drew out with them whatever they touched?
final_alignments\Pliny_Younger_Panegyricus.json