quot ADJ11NOMSMPOS enim CONJ qu PRON10DATPX scholastic N21GENPM non ADV h PRON31ABLSF su N22NOMPN persuasio N31NOMSF n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S fru V31PRESIND3S ut CONJ s PRON54ABLXC ante ADVPOS ciceron N31ACCSM numer V11PRESACTIVESUB3S sed CONJ plan ADJ11VOCSMPOS post ADVPOS gabinian ADJ11NOMSNPOS at CONJ ego PRON51NOMSC non ADV ver V21FUTIND1S nomin V11PRESACTIVEINF0X singul ADJ11ACCPMPOS qu PRON10ABLSM facili ADJ32NOMSNCOMP proposit VPAR31DATPXPERFPASSIVEPPL exempl N22LOCPN adpar V21PRESACTIVESUB3S qu PRON10DATPX grad N41DATPM fract VPAR31NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL sit V51PRESACTIVEIND3P et CONJ deminut VPAR31NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL eloqu VPAR31NOMPNPRESPPL
Why, almost all our professional rhetoricians plume themselves on their pet conviction that each of them is to be ranked as superior to Cicero, though distinctly inferior to Gabinianus. I shall not hesitate, on the other hand, to name individuals in order to show, by the citation of instances, the successive stages in the decline and fall of eloquence.
final_alignments\Tacitus_Dialogus.json