qu PRON10DATPX dix V31PERFACTIVEINF0X du NUM12ACCPMCARD r N51ACCSF maiestat N31LOCSF sub PREPABL un NUM11NOMSFCARD regn VPAR11ACCSCPRESACTIVEPPL propri ADJ11ACCSFPOS que CONJ s PRON54DATXC retro ADVPOS que CONJ perenn ADJ32ACCSCPOS aus V51PRESACTIVESUB3S et CONJ un NUM11GENSXCARD nat VPAR31GENSFFUTPPL excind V31PRESACTIVEINF0X vir V21PRESACTIVEIND2S numquid ADVPOS adoptiv ADJ11NOMSNPOS gen V31FUTPASSIVEIMP2S s PRON54DATXC sumps V31PERFACTIVEIND3S ut CONJ alt V11PRESPASSIVESUB1S extern ADJ11GENSMPOS gen V31PRESPASSIVEIND2S numer N21ACCSM praest V11PRESACTIVEINF0X du NUM12GENPMCARD deb V21PRESACTIVESUB3S et CONJ gemin N21ACCSM dist VPAR11NOMSXPRESACTIVEPPL induc V31PRESACTIVEINF0X numen N32NOMSN form N11NOMSF patr N31GENSM ver N21GENSM ver N21NOMSM st V11PRESACTIVEIND3S fili N25NOMSM ac CONJ s PRON54ABLXC un NUM11NOMSNCARD rite ADVPOS prob V11PRESACTIVEIND3S dum CONJ form N11ACCSF serv V11PRESACTIVEIND3S dem TACKON
Who would venture to say that that which reigns in one majesty and belongs to itself alone and was for ever pre-existent is two Gods, and to break down the strength of a being that is single? Did the Father take to himself a Son by adoption, so that the second, being of external origin, must then make the number two and, being separate, bring in a dual Godhead? No, He is a real Son, the likeness of a real Father, and properly proves his unity by keeping the same likeness.
final_alignments\Prudentius_Origin_Of_Sin.json