sed CONJ caesar N31NOMSM miss N11LOCPF ad ADVPOS senat N41ACCSM litter N11LOCPF disseru V31PERFACTIVEIND3S mor N31ACCSM fu V51PERFACTIVEINF0X mai ADJ11DATPXCOMP quotiens ADVPOS dirim V31IMPFACTIVESUB3P amiciti N11ACCPF interdic V31PRESACTIVEINF0X dom N21DATSF e PRON41ACCSM que CONJ fin N33ACCSC grati N11GENSF pon V31PRESACTIVEINF0X i PRON41NOMSN s PRON54ABLXC repetiv V31PERFACTIVEINF0X in PREPABL labeo N31NOMSM n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S atque CONJ ill PRON61ACCSM quia CONJ mal N21VOCSM administrat VPAR11GENSFPERFPASSIVEPPL provinci N11GENSF ali N24GENPN que CONJ crimin N32GENPN urg V21IMPFPASSIVEIND3S culp N11ACCSF invidi N11NOMSF velav V11PERFACTIVEINF0X frustr V11PRESACTIVEIMP2S conterrit VPAR21NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL uxor N31LOCSF qu PRON10ACCSF etsi CONJ noc VPAR21ACCSCPRESACTIVEPPL pericul N22GENSN tamen ADVPOS expert ADJ31ACCSCPOS fu V51PERFACTIVEINF0X
The Caesar, however, in a letter addressed to the senate, explained that it had been the custom of our ancestors, as often as they broke off a friendship, to interdict their house to the offender and to make this the close of amicable relations. To that method he had himself reverted in the case of Labeo: but Labeo, arraigned for maladministration of his province, as well as on other counts, had veiled his guilt by casting a slur upon his sovereign, while inspiring a baseless terror in his wife, who, though guilty had still stood in no danger.
final_alignments\Tacitus_Annals_Book6.json