atque CONJ ego PRON51NOMSC omn ADJ32NOMPNPOS obiect VPAR31NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL seu CONJ ver N22NOMPN seu CONJ fals VPAR31NOMPNPERFPASSIVEPPL sunt V51PRESACTIVEIND3P non ADV neg V11FUTACTIVEIND1S sed CONJ perinde ADVPOS atque CONJ si CONJ fact VPAR31NOMPNPERFPASSIVEPPL sint V51PRESACTIVEIND3P fat V21FUTIND1S ut CONJ omn ADJ32NOMSCPOS ist PRON61NOMSF multitudo N31NOMSF qu PRON10NOMPF pluri ADJ11NOMSFSUPER undique ADVPOS ad ADVPOS audi VPAR34NOMSNFUTPASSIVEPPL conven V41PRESACTIVEIND3S apert VPAR34VOCSMPERFPASSIVEPPL intelleg V31PRESACTIVESUB3S nihil N99XXN in PREPABL philosoph N21ACCPM non ADV mod N21DATSM ver N21VOCSM dic V31PRESPASSIVEINF0X sed CONJ n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S fals VPAR31DATSMPERFPASSIVEPPL quidem ADVPOS poss V52PRESACTIVEINF0X confing V31PRESPASSIVEINF0X qu PRON10NOMSN non ADV ex PREPABL innocenti N11GENSF fiduci N11NOMSF  lic V21PRESACTIVESUB3S neg V11PRESACTIVEINF0X tamen ADVPOS poti ADJ00NOMSNCOMP hab V21PRESACTIVESUB3P defend V31PRESACTIVEINF0X
And indeed I will not deny but rather will admit every one of the charges, whether true or false, just as if they were facts. In that way, all this crowd, which has come streaming from all sides to listen, may clearly see that nothing can be truthfully alleged against philosophers, or indeed falsely fabricated, that their trust in their own innocence would not allow them to defend, even though they might deny them.
final_alignments\Apuleius_Apologia.json