nemin N31ACCSC nomin V11FUTACTIVEIND1S gen N42GENSN homin N31GENPM significav V11PERFACTIVEINF0X content VPAR31NOMSMPERFPASSIVEPPL sed CONJ v PRON53DATPC utique ADVPOS vers V11PRESPASSIVEIND3P ante ADVPOS ocul N21ACCPM ist PRON61DATSX qu PRON10NOMPM lucil ADJ32GENPXPOS pro PREPABL Horatio OTHER et CONJ Lucretium OTHER pro PREPABL vergili N25DATSM leg V31PRESACTIVEIND3P qu PRON10DATPX eloqu VPAR31NOMPNPRESPPL  bass ADJ11GENSMPOS aut CONJ Servilii OTHER  ex PREPABL comparatio N31NOMSF n V21PRESACTIVEIMP2S Sisennae OTHER aut CONJ Varronis OTHER sord V21PRESACTIVEIND3S qu PRON10NOMPM rhetor N36GENSM nostr N23GENPM commentari N24ACCPM fastidi V41PRESACTIVEIND3P od V31PERFACTIVEIND3P calv V21PERFACTIVEIND1S mir V11PRESPASSIVEIND3P
I mention no names, as it is enough for me to indicate a type; but you of course will have in your minds eye the archaists who prefer Lucilius to Horace, and Lucretius to Virgil, who consider the style of Aufidius Bassus and Servilius Nonianus very inferior as compared with that of Sisenna or Varro, who, while they admire the draft speeches which Calvus left behind him, have nothing but feelings of disdain and repugnance for those of our own contemporaries.
final_alignments\Tacitus_Dialogus.json