ergo ADVPOS Democritus OTHER etsi CONJ non ADV propri ADJ11VOCSMPOS r N51NOMSF nominav V11PERFACTIVEIND3S sed CONJ tant ADJ11NOMSNPOS individu N22NOMPN corpor V11PRESACTIVEIMP2S proposu V31PERFACTIVEIND3S ideo ADVPOS e V11PRESACTIVEIMP2S ips PRON62NOMSF dix V31PERFACTIVEINF0X vid V21PRESPASSIVEIND3S qu PRON10NOMSN e V11PRESACTIVEIMP2S cum ADVPOS s V51PRESACTIVESUB3P disiunct ADJ11NOMSFPOS nec ADVPOS laed V31PRESPASSIVEIND3P nec ADVPOS  recipi V31PRESACTIVEIND3P nec ADVPOS section N31LOCPF divid V31PRESPASSIVEIND3P sed CONJ sempitern ADJ11DATSMPOS aev N21DATSM perpetu ADJ11DATSMPOS infinit ADJ11ACCSFPOS retin V21PRESACTIVEIND3P in PREPABL s PRON54ABLXC soliditat N31ACCSF
Therefore Democritus, although he did not name things as such, but supposed atoms only, seems to have spoken of them as such because although they may be separated out, they are not damaged nor destroyed, nor cut up into parts, but retain in themselves for ever a perfect solidity.
final_alignments\Vitruvius_Architecture_Book_2.json