tum ADVPOS fact VPAR31NOMSFPERFPASSIVEPPL patr N31LOCPM potestat N31LOCSF statu VPAR31GENSMFUTPASSIVEPPL de PREPABL c ADV caecilian ADJ11DATSMPOS senator N31LOCSM qu PRON10NOMPM pluri ADJ11NOMSFSUPER advers N21ACCSM cott N11ACCSM promps V31PLUPACTIVEIND3S placit VPAR21NOMSNPERFPASSIVEPPL  poen N11ACCSF inrog V11PRESPASSIVEINF0X qu PRON10ACCSF in PREPABL Aruseium OTHER et CONJ Sanquinium OTHER accusator N31NOMPM l ADV Arruntii OTHER qu PRON10ABLSM non ADV ali ADJ15NOMSNPOS honorificenti ADJ11NOMSNCOMP cott N11GENSM even V41PRESACTIVEIND3S qu PRON10NOMPM nobil ADJ32NOMSCPOS quidem ADVPOS set CONJ eg VPAR21NOMSXPRESACTIVEPPL ob PREPACC lux N41ACCSM per PREPACC flagiti N24NOMPN infam ADJ32NOMSCPOS sanctissi ADJ11DATPXSUPER Arruntii OTHER art N33LOCPF dignitat N31LOCSF ultion N31GENSF aequ V11IMPFPASSIVEIND3S
The Fathers were then empowered to decide upon the case of Gaius Caecilianus, a senator who had produced most of the evidence against Cotta; and it was agreed that the same penalty should be inflicted as on Aruseius and Sanquinius, the accusers of Lucius Arruntius. It was the most signal compliment that ever fell to the share of Cotta; who, noble undoubtedly, but beggared by his prodigality and degraded by his vices, was now honoured with a vengeance that placed him on a level with the spotless character of Arruntius.
final_alignments\Tacitus_Annals_Book6.json