qu PRON10NOMSN ergo ADVPOS indistinct ADJ11NOMSFPOS h PRON31NOMSF defensio N31NOMSF et CONJ promisc ADJ11NOMSFPOS d V11FUTPASSIVEIND3S immo ADVPOS iust N22LOCPN termin N32GENSN divid V31PRESPASSIVESUB3S
What then? Is this defence to be allowed without discrimination to all and sundry? Not so: let the dividing line be drawn true;
final_alignments\Tacitus_Annals_Book6.json