Ob haec et similia, concordi consensu dehortantibus multis, maximeque Modesto, praefecto praetorio, regiorum arbitrio spadonum exposito, et subagreste ingenium, nullis vetustatis lectionibus expolitum, coacto vultu fallente, et asserente, quod infra imperiale columen causarum essent minutiae privatarum; ille ad humilitandam celsitudinem potestatis negotiorum examina spectanda instituta esse arbitratus (ut monebat), abstinuit penitus, laxavitque rapinarum fores quae roborabantur in dies, iudicum advocatorumque pravitate sentientium paria,qui tenuiorum negotia militaris rei rectoribus, vel intra palatium validis venditantes, aut opes aut honores quaesivere praeclaros.
On these and similar grounds many united in a common attempt at dissuasion and in particular the praetorian prefect Modestus, a man wholly subjected to the influence of the eunuchs of the court, of a boorish nature refined by no reading of the ancient writers. He, wearing a forced and deceptive expression, declared that the trivialities of private cases at law were beneath the dignity of the imperial majesty. Accordingly Valens, thinking that the examination of swarms of legal cases was devised to humble the loftiness of the royal power, in accordance with the advice of Modestus, abstained from it wholly, thereby opening the doors to robbery; and this grew stronger day by day through the wickedness of judges and advocates in collusion; for they sold their decisions of the cases of poorer people to officers in the army, or to powerful men within the palace, and thus gained either wealth or high position.
final_alignments\Ammianus_Marcellinus_Book30.json