unde in utroque operis forma indiscreta, nisiomnem vim maiestatis patriae generosus haberet Filius, idque Deus genitor, quod Filius, esset? pergunt ulterius scrutantes quid sit id ipsum gignere, si fas est humanos tendere sensus usque ad secretum, quod tempora cuncta diesque praevenit antiquos, et principium super ipsum eminet et, quodcumque potest homo quaerere, transit.
How could the shape of their work be undistinguishable in both, did not the high-born Son possess all the force of his Fathers majesty, and were not God the Father that which the Son is? Men go further, prying into the very meaning of begetting, if it is lawful to stretch human thought to the mystery which precedes all times and days of old and stands beyond the very beginning, passing all the wit of man to search out.
final_alignments\Prudentius_Divinity_Of_Christ.json