Si quaecunque ratio praeest animarum humanarum reciprocandarum in corpora, cur non in eandem substantiam redeant, cum hoc sit restitui, id esse quod fuerat? Iam non ipsae sunt quae fuerant, quia non potuerunt esse quod non erant, nisi desinant esse quod fuerant.
If there is any reason to suppose the return of souls into bodies, why should they not return into the same substance, when restoration means that a thing is what before it had been? But they are not now what they were,'because they could not become what they were not before, unless they ceased to be what they had been.
final_alignments\Tertullian_Apology.json