Praeterea quare quisquam magis omnia tollat et velit ardoris naturam linquere solam, quam neget esse ignis, aliud tamen esse relinquat? aequa videtur enim dementia dicere utrumque.
Besides, why should one take away everything and choose to leave only the nature of fire, rather than deny that fire exists and still allow that something else exists? It seems equal madness to assert either.
final_alignments\Lucretius_De_Rerum_Natura_Book1.json