At enim Dymnus, cum ceteros participes sceleris indicaret, Philotan non nominavit! Hoc quidem illius non innocentiae, sed potentiae indicium est, quod sic ab eis timetur etiam a quibus prodi potest, ut, cum de se fateantur, illum tamen celent.
Then the king continued: But, it may be said, Dymnus, when he revealed the other participants in the crime, did not name Philotas. This, in fact, is a sign, not of his innocence, but of his authority, because he was so feared even by those by whom he could be betrayed, that when they confessed their own guilt, they nevertheless did not name him.
final_alignments\Quintus_Curtius_Alexander_Book6.json