Atqui coniurationis caput me fuisse credit rex! Potuit ergo Dymnus eum praeterire quem sequebatur, praesertim cum quaerenti socios vel falso fuerim nominandus, quo facilius  qui temptabatur posset impelli? Non enim detecto facinore nomen meum praeteriit, ut possit videri socio pepercisse; Nicomacho, quem taciturum arcana de semetipso credebat, confessus, aliis nominatis  me unum subtrahebat.
And yet the king believes me to have been the head of the conspiracy! Could Dymnus then fail to mention the one whose follower he was, especially when I ought to have been named, even falsely, to Nicomachus, who asked who were his associates, in order that the man who was being  tempted might be more easily persuaded? For when the crime was disclosed, he did not leave out my name in order that he might seem to have spared an associate; for when he confessed to Nicomachus, who he believed would keep in silence the secrets about himself  self, having named others, me alone he left out.
final_alignments\Quintus_Curtius_Alexander_Book6.json