dicite, sacrilegi doctores, qui Patre summo desertum iacuisse thronum contenditis illo tempore quo fragiles Deus est inlapsus in artus, ergo Pater passus? quid non malus audeat error? ipse puellari conceptus sanguine crevit? ipse verecundae distendit virginis alvum? et iam falsiloqua est divini pagina libri, quae Verbum in carnis loquitur fluxisse figuram? at non, qui Verbi Pater est, caro factus habetur.
Tell me, ye blasphemous teachers, who maintain that the supreme Father abandoned his throne at the time when God entered into a mortal body, was it the Father, then, who suffered? What would not evil error dare? Was the Father himself conceived and did He grow from a maids blood? Did He himself swell a modest virgins womb? And does the page of the holy book lie, then, when it says that the Word passed into the form of flesh? It is not He who is the Father of the Word, that is believed to have been made flesh.
final_alignments\Prudentius_Divinity_Of_Christ.json