Hominem omnium nequissimum, qui non dubitaret vel in foro alea ludere, lege quae est de alea condemnatum qui in integrum restituit, is non apertissime studium suum ipse profitetur?
But seeing that he is an utterly worthless fellow, the sort that did not hesitate to gamble in the very Forum and was condemned under the gaming law, does not the author of his rehabilitation make his own proclivities unmistakable?
final_alignments\Cicero_Philippic_2.json