Et quamquam in disceptando aliquotiens erat intempestivus, quid quisque iurgantium coleret, tempore alieno interrogans, tamen nulla eius definitio litis a vero dissonans reperitur, nec argui umquam potuit, ob religionem vel quodcumque aliud ab aequitatis recto tramite deviasse.
And, although in arguing cases he was sometimes untimely, asking at some inopportune moment what the religion of each of the litigants was, yet it cannot be found that in the decision of any suit he was inconsistent with equity, nor could he ever be accused because of a mans religious views, or for any other cause, of having deviated from the straight path of justice.
final_alignments\Ammianus_Marcellinus_Book22.json