Also note that this case is not without a precedent. In June 2015, Dutch citizens sued the Netherlands for failing to protect its citizens from the results of climate change... and WON! So now, their government is required to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by 25% over 5 years (as opposed to the scheduled 14-17%). As Newsweek mentioned, it was the "first case to use the law of torts - legal duty to refrain from causing harm—and human rights law to bring a climate change suit against a country." In response to Looker, who do you think is paying for all of the catastrophic damage we are incurring from increased flooding, droughts, wildfires, etc?