Yes, I agree. I made that point in the early goings of this debate, probably a year or so ago. The behavior that Paul is denouncing is named in the text, as is the physical/temporal, here-and-now consequence of partaking of the Eucharistic meal in the manner that he denounced. But the rest of the text is mere commentary to moralistic proof-texters who lack the ability and/or effort to undertake the necessary exegesis to justify their claims.