RolandX

One does not have to accept any hypothesis simply because is cannot be disproved.  Based on what you are saying anything that cannot be disproved should be given equal relevancy.  I can think of thousands if not millions of things that cannot be disproved.  It does not mean that anyone who does not believe them has an belief system that is opposite.

One poster indicated that their neighbors dog created the universe.  This cannot be disproved but it does not fit the evidence and therefore is not considered relevant.

If you make the statement that there is a god, you must provide evidence as such.  Me not accepting your claim without evidence is not a belief.  It is no different then you not accepting the tooth fairy is a belief.

Kids accept the tooth fairy because they put their teeth under the pillow and it is replaced with money... That is the evidence... Once they reach the age of critical thinking they realize they have been duped...