Helga

Once again, you demonstrate the fact that antifluoridationists have no understanding of what constitutes valid evidence.  Donna did not present "Canadian data".  She presented her unsubstantiated claim as to what she deems was done by the Ministry of Health, and her own interpretation of what she claims was found in some "collected data".  This is nothing but anecdotal personal opinion.  If she desires credibility for her claims she will need to properly cite where this data may be found such that it can be viewed at its original source, verified for accuracy of what she claims, and considered in its proper context.

The information I provided was a direct quote from the McLaren study, which I properly cited.

Antifluoridationists will never understand that they can't just state whatever unsubstantiated claims they wish, and expect that to be accorded credence.

Steven D. Slott, DDS