I disagree.  The problem is the BC Libs' record.   Refusing to end big money political contributions.   Wilful blindness to the toxic effect of largely uncontrolled foreign capital in the housing market.   Antipathy to government support for daycare.   The political equivalent of an extended middle finger to young families and non-Reform/Socred voters.

The BC Libs alienated a significant proportion of voters in greater Vancouver, particularly in Surrey, the Tri Cities, Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge.   The BC Libs put their effort into the interior and the north.   That strategy is a one trick pony.   The demographics and the population growth in urban ridings are against the BC Libs.

Who would the BC Libs replace Ms. Clark with?   That is, who would give them a better result?

The BC Libs had all of the advantages.  Money.  Government.  Economy.   Endorsements from media.   And a Trump softwood lumber bombshell.  And this is the best they could do?