Institutional response from the CNS.  All laudatory.  Never mentioned how he treated his predecessor, Walter Sullivan, barring him from speaking on RC premises.  Supports Burbidge's verbiage: 
"his firm grasp of the church's moral teaching".  Lori's, he did "cheerfully did whatever the church asked of him."  Not critically.  Critical thinking - not the mindset of a RCC hierarchs: "Ours is not to question why..."!
Typical of CNS mention of his predecessor in Hawaii as retiring for reason of health. Cf. what Bishops Accountability has on the record.
No doubt he supported positive efforts but not everything he touched was gold.
The CNS is typical of any institutional response.  Doesn't provide a perspective of the plus and minus of a 
leader to let the reader decide.  All goodness and light.  No one is. 
DiLorenzo sent to Richmond to bring order to what Walter Sullivan had wrought. Perhaps Francis might appoint someone closer in spirit to Sullivan, though the clerical pool is slim.
R.I.P.