I would normally expect a measure of objectivity, in reading a food review...rather than such an hysterical attack, of the sort vomited onto this writer's page.

This has more the tone of petty revenge (or something from the lunatic fringe of Trip Advisor) about it. It is as though he has a (personal) problem with Blake's very name; a problem verging on hysteria, and this has nothing to do with the actual product, which is, one assumes, why he was writing a review to begin with.

 One cannot help but wonder at the qualifications of Dan Clapson. What does he truly know about food? What real training or background, in the food industry? 

 He seems a fellow who is lacking a fundamental grasp of what it is that restaurants provide, and comes across as the embodiment of the adage; "If you wish to see the true character of a person, give them power." I think it is obvious what kind of person we have, in Dan Clapson; spiteful and incapable of an objective summary.