This essay is arguing that all the violence coming from the Left is legitimate, simply because the president didn't sign on with the climate change pols, and reinforced a temporary ban (originating with Obama) on people from several violently radicalized nations.

That's an argument that's not just silly.   It simply doesn't have a moral leg to stand on.

And it's disturbing to me that so many otherwise reasonable and intelligent people seem to agree with its author's hyper progressive views on how very little is necessary to justify violence.