Despite what some people posting on this thread would have us all believe, Swift's talent, wealth, privilege, like-ability or the lack of any of those things in irrelevant to the legal proceedings at hand. What is at issue is whether or not Swift or her team interfered with the DJ's employment. If the jury reasonably believes that the DJ grabbed her azz, then he looses and she wins.  If the jury doesn't think he grabbed her azz, but also doesn't believes that Swift didn't inter feared with his employment then they both lose.  For the DJ to win, the jury has to believe that he did nothing wrong and that Swift identified the wrong person, and then pressured the radio station to fire him. 

All the comments about Swift being untalented, a snake, spoiled, rich, privileged....blah blah blah... is just a bunch of spiteful garbage. (some people need to just grow up and learn some manners!)