geezer, I think Strada was referring to my bias, not the researchers. Sure enough, Strada, I could have reported other impacts of climate change on other mammals, birds, amphibians, fish, and insects and other invertebrates. Not to mention plants. And glaciers and rocks are certainly affected. All of these impacts affect people of course. And I'm fully aware that all of these animate and inanimate subjects interact with one another. Having embarked on the task of "inclusion" and avoiding all the pitfalls of "exclusion", and with the help of thousands of other researchers and assistant writers who spend our entire lives compiling a "report" that has more pages than the Library of Congress, we still wouldn't be telling the whole picture and you'd be able to accuse me of bias. Or, I could just write a simple article describing how a couple of local scientists are examining one aspect of climate change: how advancing shrubs might be affecting Dall sheep.