Clearly U of Ts legal advisors disagree with you and felt that Petersons discussions on the subject were against OHRC thinking on the subject. That much is undeniable. That gender expression as a scientific theory is protected by this legislation under threat of government punitive action for those who publicly oppose it is also undeniable. How about pronouns? Certainly forcing people to conform to the scientific conclusions as set out in this legislation by forcing individuals to use those pronouns, regardless of whether they agree with the science or not is as clear an indicator as any that going against this legislation is illegal. At any rate, I believe Petersons multiple offers to debate the science on this subject, issued to any number of individuals, organizations and entire academic departments still stands. So, legal or otherwise, the public deserves to hear it.