Thanks for the useful reply (I mean this, not trying to be snarky). The numbers on page 25 add up as you say. The key is that they include job growth only up to the second quarter of 2014, and in other places they say all the jobs are regained in late 2014.

Why they just use the earlier data for this particular graph I don't know, especially since, as you say, they are trying to paint a bright picture and in other graphs have more recent data. If you look up reports looking back at 2016 quarters, it is pretty obvious that threshold of regaining the jobs has been reached for some time.