I'd like to make the following points in response to Alice Chainerson's comments:
1- It is true that the Corps's failure to complete an EIS for BP's Cherry Point tanker dock (over a decade after being directed to by federal courts) and the green light given for the expansion of the Kinder Morgan pipeline by the Canadian and BC provincial governments.  However, one compounds the risk of an oil spill posed to the Salish Sea by the other. Doubling the number of tanker docks at BP clearly increases their ability to handle more tankers and the tripling of the capacity of the Kinder Morgan Pipeline results in a seven fold increase in the number of oil tankers plying these same waters.
2- If Alice has a problem with the purported "fuzzy math" associated with the increased number of tankers able to call on BP's refinery due to the additional dock, she should take it up with the Army Corps because the numbers can be found in their draft environmental impact statement.