Sadly this is probably a done deal - despite the many questions and issues that ought to be raised. Starting with: Why is this Spanish company the only bidder? Moving onto: Why does DIA need an outside company to manage this project and collect a huge chunk of the revenue? Why is Kim Day so ardently pushing a project that her primary customers, the airlines, universally oppose? Many parties, from industry experts, to just us plain ole folks who use the airport, see huge flaws in this plan. At a time when the airline business is undergoing constant change this deal would lock DIA into a fixed structure for 34 years! Day tells us that at 23 years old DIA is obsolete, then wants to commit the City to a 34 year plan. Huh? She had the gall (incompetence) to agree to an $8 million fee to Ferrovial should the City Council vote against proceeding. Again, Huh?  The best outcome of tonight's meeting would be the firing of Day and a fresh look at the future needs of DIA.