Maybe jail time or vehicle impoundment is the answer to repeat offenders, regardless of income.

Seems like the issue is not public safety, but imposing a brand-new form of discrimination based on income.

If your law is meant simply to improve traffic safety, how exactly does monetary discrimination against the well-to-do improve it?

As Municipal Attorney, how do you defend against a constitutionality lawsuit? Do our founding documents approve discrimination based on income? 

Once this thing starts, there's no stopping it. If your Ferrari's dong 65 in a 60, coming up to a Honda Accord doing 75 in a 60, who'll be stopped because government and police get more money? 

Why not completely exempt young impoverished drivers compelled to live with parents during their first quarter century of life?

Why not scale all municipal fees, utility bills, and property taxes to income?

In other words, once rooted in our justice system, where does income-based discrimination stop?