RIGHT!!!! Its not only permissible but absolutely necessary to fund only science that will turn out the 'right results'.  This per your prior posts and prior attempts to pass laws to make science a criminal offense http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/2/calif-bill-prosecutes-climate-change-skeptics/
Or widely publicized comments by Sen Sheldon Whitehouse about prosecuting climate change deniers in the Senate Judiciary committee.  

That has NO EFFECT on the results or outcomes on the science but losing funding now has agencies and non profits changing the wording used in their reports, their names, and their stated PURPOSE.  That is supposedly terribly chilling and we should all be appalled by it according to your post.  

YOU and alarmists like you have said for YEARS that it was utterly acceptable to have the government apply pressure, censorship and acceptable results to scientists (as long as it agreed with you).  Now that your money is at stake, not so much.