I think that two types of comments are justifiable in this column: 1) from people who have seen the play; 2) from people who wish to comment on the review. Do you have a problem with that?
Or do you suppose it fair for people to wade in with negative comments based upon what other people say, even though there be expertise in what they say, which is not the case with the G&M review?
On a point of fairness, where do I "presume" that those I criticize haven't seen the play, when one admits to it, one implies that he hasn't and the other does not say? (And then you, another "absentee," wade in!)
As to arrogance, I suggest you look in the mirror after your obloquy on the Stratford Beacon Herald, even though I cautioned that it may be seen as a cheerleader. Will you write to tell them they are liars?
My original post says that the G&M review is flawed and that it is sad for anyone to rate the play based on it. Where, tell me, am I in error, either in this or in flagging your pomposity?