We the people of BC, don't need Site C. If industry needs it, let them supply their own power, or pay for Site C. Why should we taxpayers pay for Site C, households don't need it.
There are questions if the ground is stable enough, who pays in the event of a dam failure.
Fracking has only caused 90% of earthquakes over 3.0 on the Richter scale. Fracking is bad enough as it is, but having it done near a dam with potentially unstable ground, increases the risk factor = recipe for a disaster.
Supposedly it will cost 8 billion, who thinks probably 10, maybe 12.
Is there something wrong with the concept of user pay? Other than business in BC and Canada, have become such huge welfare recipients, the idea of user pay is abhorrent, if they are the users. 
Bombardier gets a handout, top executives got raises (which were later rescinded)
What were the raises for fanbois? Getting a government bailout?