You did start jumping on me. You replied to every post I made originally that I was wrong. I have not made any weird assumptions but was restating the way that you have been sounding. You keep arguing that the constitution doesn't allow freedom of expression for religion and yet numerous supreme courts cases have said that religious belief is protected is by the first amendment. Here's a few more court cases that were presented to the supreme court that says religious beliefs are protected.

http://freedomofreligionfirstamendment.weebly.com/court-cases.html

Again, this supersedes state law and is protected by the constitution.

At this point though you have made it clearly evident that you have not looked into the court cases or other articles I have provided and everything you have presented is personal beliefs in how you feel the justice system works. You have not shown that religious belief is not protected by the constitution and I have provided multiple examples that it is.