So we've established that a mutual profit motive exists, though yours is more karmic than tangible. That's progress. Another upside is that if this ordinance passes in Springfield, caffeine addicts won't be clogging up the city's turn lanes. Giving to others is hardly mysterious. The tricky part is wondering what behavior the gotten gains might lead to and if the giving was a good idea in the first place. Would an overdose or a booze-fueled violent act qualify as a donation interaction gone bad, or does having it out of sight and therefore out of mind help with the rationalization?