Isn't this part of the liberal lifestyle in Hollywood? The casting couch? It seems to me that the NY Times piece was initiated by the leak of a lengthy memo written by former employee, now a big executive at Amazon Studios, Laureen O'Connor who thoroughly trashed Weinstein to his Board of Directors. The question always is in this day and age, who stood to gain by leaking the memo to initiate the destruction of this specific casting couch producer? I can think of two parties right now who might have benefited, three if one includes the NY Times' attempt at a sensational story. The question in one's mind is why did the NY Times et al simply stop at the casting couch of Harvey Weinstein when there are undoubtedly hundreds more false promises made by tons of other famous producers, directors and actors on the nearest soft horizontal casting device they can find?