I haven't mentioned Planned Parenthood today except for this one:

"You are the advocate for Planned Parenthood who wants to avoid imputed guilt for its history.
I cited involuntary sterilization and its proponent as a preferred alternative to easy abortion by the promiscuous. 
Your vehemence and insertion of Planned Parenthood into the discussion is irrelevant to my position except when you attempt to deny the actual recorded history of your heroine's beliefs because you do not want to see her feet of clay."

You are the one pursuing that particular rabbit!  

You are defending an attack not made by me.  Always There has had some rather negative things to say about PP.  

Perhaps you are getting confused by arguing with two people at the same time about the same subject without the RAM necessary to do it successfully?  Time to re-boot!