Nicely written article that took the time to give readers specific examples of gross generalizations, something I did not do yesterday.

I was thinking that his background in philosophy fits his very fuzzy writing on modern politics.  Yet I know just enough about philosophy to know that the discipline is working closely with modern physics which changes many things in philosophical dialog.   Yes, philosophers do not deny scientific evidence and in fact philosophy supports the sciences method of discovery.  The good professor made no attempt to back his claims with facts.

I did not want to insult all philosophy professors.     My assumption is that the endorsement was from an academic and any academic would do.   But the writing  is pure politics, a recitation of the modern talking points of the new populist conservatism.