“As many know, our ‘leaders’ of Creswell High School have taken things a little too far,” she wrote. “With that being said, we are protesting the consequences of the actions of the high school principal and vice principal."   This is really a confusing statement.  It almost reads like they're protesting not the "actions of the principal and vice principal", but the placing of them on administrative leave....which was the "consequences" of the actions.

I'd appreciate it if Alisha Roemeling, reporter filing this story, could clarify this for me.  It makes a very big difference to the understanding of the proposed student demonstration.  Is it to support the District's action in instituting the "paid leave" or is it to protest that action and, in effect, support Mr. Bracco and Mr. Osborn?   Thanks, Gary Crum