No, "Blevins" believes that actually doing the analysis matters. Blevins believes that simply using one's position of authority to proclaim other, less famous, economists' work to be invalid is itself invalid - being an example of the fallacy of appeal to authority. Blevins believes that the 170 economists who have approved Sanders plans matter more than the handful of poobahs such as Krugman who have used their reputations to try to win the argument. Blevins believes that it is actually the Krugman side which is using Koch brothers type arguments by making this appeal to authority - if there's one thing the Koch's LOVE it is the authority conferred by money. Blevins also believes that Sanders has the widespread appeal to have long and broad coattails, and to shake up things enough to force Congress to act. Blevins also believes that the internet and social media will continue to be the vehicle of Sanders' revolution.