Gini is not any kind of way to describe even a simplified economic condition.  It's faulty.

Like the Laffer curve.  It's been debunked.  Some people still think the Earth is flat.

You can find their theory on a wiki page too.  Big whoop.

And...

No, I didn't ask him any such thing as where it was quantified, 

...I asked where he got the cockamamie idea that Alaska was a 'best state.' in terms of income inequality.

He didn't answer.

You did.

He might of got if from Paul Jenkins or Tim Bradner, or who knows, …. Alex Jones.


You offered up the Wiki page leading to a debunked theoretical fallacy.

And Pender, there's no need for me to offer any such alternative because there simply is no 'best state' in terms of income inequality.

You're either suffering miserably from income inequality or you're benefitting immensely.

Where you do that is immaterial.

When the middle gets closer to the bottom, if you're in one place or another it won't matter.

It's not a geographic condition.