To be clear, no one is trying to deny anyone the right to hold a sign on a street corner to advertise anything. Also, no one is denying you the opportunity to exercise your right to donate to whomever you wish. What is at issue is the manner in which that transaction takes place. You're in favor of drive-thru philanthropic convenience and would threaten legal action to preserve it.

Let's take it a step further. An enterprising coffee hut owner decides curbside delivery would be an efficient way to boost business. A customer using hands-free technology calls in an order while driving, completes the online transaction as the car sits idling before the coffee arrives and then has it handed through the window while waiting for the light to change. Quick, easy and, above all, convenient. Problem?