John: 3/4 there doesn't mean 1/4 of the money left to spend. Why throw good money after bad just to finish a project that will end up having operational costs higher than the infrastructure already in place? The port as well as the rail spur will have higher variable costs. That's even if you completely ignore the capital investment. There are a lot of reasons but it was my job for a long time to understand those numbers and it's unquestionable in my mind after years of homework. Resource development doesn't need McKenzie and neither does the State of Alaska. There are much less expensive ways to get resources to market.