Never met the guy. But I got interested in how he was winning and what the law was that was giving him his advantage. Also wondered who was he actually helping so I read his cases and particularly what the US Supreme Court had to say. That decision says a lot and explains his focus. He is not theoretical. The decision is based on the constitutional rights of over a thousand specific people in Hawaii who are citizens or legal residents as well as their rights under the immigration laws which have not changed. His argument earned the respect of the Supreme Court which created an exception for the people from Hawaii and devoted several pages to why the Court granted an exception for them from Trump’s ban and extended it to people from other states. Even some of the US Attornies have acknowledged that Trump’s ban should have provided this. The Hawaii exceptions, though, have gone into then out of Trump’s newest order which may invite more litigation.