You know, one would almost think for an article like this one would want to include some input from those who support what the article calls 'traditionalist approaches to liturgy' to attempt to understand where they are coming from, even if it then went on to question and/or criticize those reasons, or offer counter-arguments.  Granted, I understand not every article is to be in-depth, but still.

I have always thought a potential good of comment boards like this is that one can encounter those with differing viewpoints and try to understand where they are coming from, but at times it is very discouraging.