I've got a lot of respect for District Attorneys but DA Gray seems to be a bit disingenuous. Take for instance, $6,500 / 18 = $350. So yeah, that's typically no jail time territory under SB91. Except when you consider that she did it 18 times.  You'd be hard pressed to find a DA who wouldn't push for jail time and equally hard pressed to find a judge not willing to go along with the DAs recommendation. And no initial jail time doesn't mean there wouldn't be supervised probation and subsequent violations which result in jail time being imposed. Also, this was a buiness theft, which kinda makes you wonder about their record keeping - another reason for low priority. And lastly, she fled state. Why waste time reviewing a case for someone who may never come back to prosecute. My understanding is all the DAs are pretty pissed right now with SB91 so it's no surprise he uses this as an opportunity to express his dissatisfaction.