"You trust your sources like The Toronto Star, Globe, CBC, CNN, NYTimes, how are they any better than Fox or Brierbart. Not sure you believe in your rhetoric."

It is difficult to respond to a quote like this without running afoul of the censors. To claim that Breitbart, or Fox News, are journalistic equivalents of the NYT or Globe and Mail is absurd. To make such a claim in a public forum is a partial explanation for the success of Trump's war on the media. When a venerable institution like the NYT, winner of dozens of Pulitzers, one of the most trusted newspapers on the planet, is equated with Breitbart, a site established with the express purpose of publishing biased work, and then morphed by Bannon into the self-admitted heart of the alt-right, there is no hope of reasonable discussion, no possibility of meaningful dialog. If people actually believe that there is no qualitative difference between Breitbart and the NYT, Those people forfeit the right to be taken seriously.