Ah yes, the perennial "compare two things that have nothing in common to draw attention" a favorite tactic of the Harvard School of Public Health's researchers.

Also the use of non-comparable measurements, "tripling" and 33% without reference to the initial numbers, a reference to a low rate without mentioning the prior low rate, and a lack of reference to the actual population numbers of the subject pools.

All that failure is, of course, on reporters who don't understand precision in thought nor how science works. Which is why Public Health researchers still get press rather than being laughed out of the room when they spout off on anything not involving an infectious biological disease.