That's over-the-top hyperbole. While I'm glad that there were strong advocates for internet freedom speaking to the issue, suggesting that the "entire internet" or anything close to it supported Google's legal position isn't correct. The internet is gigantic. Only an infinitesimal portion of it bothered to show up for this trial. Moreover, the Attorney-General's intervention was over legal jurisdiction only, not over internet freedom.

The first two questions you raise are perfectly reasonable. Nevertheless, I fail to see how the courts can allow any entity doing business in Canada evade a Canadian court order.