Skov is an establishment city "insider", and if elected will use a council vote to advance his predetermined plan without Ward 1 contingency approval.  He's just a bit too self-righteous and arrogant to realize that he first needs to  listen to Ward 1 voters.

Emily on the other hand, has no conflicts of interest, and will absolutely represent Ward 1 voters before casting council votes.  For that she's a very appealing choice, and has my vote.

Furthermore, Emily has stated her position on the major issues, while Skov has offered only doubletalk and seeming deception.

Last, Emily opposes the MUPTE program and URD because both forfeit general fund revenue, which leads to more property tax levies to fund  services (like the 2015 library levy), all of which makes housing LESS affordable.  Increased taxes are always passed-on to renters, many are low income people.   

Skov favors both, and doesn't understand this cause-and-effect.  This is  one reason why Emily is a better choice.