So the Washington Post is reporting that another source said something? Well shoot fire and save the matches! Not that their info isn't jaded, slanted, and gossipy in any way possible.  I for one will be so glad when the constant playground huddles end. We all voted and our votes counted and the machines were found to be calibrated so that is why the Clinton's did not pursue a recount. The Clinton's stated (using their own info here) there was NO credible evidence showing that the votes were altered or interfered with. The Washington Post is notorious for passing along hearsay and made up rhetoric to sell papers. Don't believe it, do some bonafide research from legit sites and support your beliefs on fact rather than the gossip jungle juice. I am rather curious, what do the people who are pushing so hard to change this election think would happen to the USA if they were successful. It would be the ultimate CHAOS, just in case you were wondering but then, you maybe you don't care.