Not required, to debunk the claim that fluoride creates good dental health.  If fluoride does what its adherents claim it does, someone from Vallejo, or any other municipality that fed fluoridation to its children and adults, should have superior dental health.  

But as we all now know, water fluoridation is not the magic bullet the industry would like us to believe it is.  I think you would probably have trouble finding Clallam County on a map, "Fyodor," but we should be the perfect experiment to prove/disprove the "magic bullet" claim  --  one community has ben fluoridated for 60 years, one has never been fluoridated, and one was fluoridated for 10 years.  

Unfortunately for the "magic" claimants, the fluoridated community has the worst child dental health, the never-fluoridated community has the best, and the ten-year community?  We don't have the data for that one, because the Delta Foundation (aka "magic bullet central") required the Op Smile data to be suppressed.  Hmm...