I realize that UAA isn't a coach away from doing well , but something has to change. In hockey , and other sports , it's impossible to change the whole team , so changing coaches can sometimes jump start a team.  Hockey used to pay UAA's sports bills , and even in decline , it still routinely draws more fans than all the other sports. IF they can increase the number of fans / income , that can justify giving the team another season or two , or more .  The Sully isn't perfect by any means , but that's not the problem right now---players don't like to play in front of small crowds.  Few coaches would sign on for UAA given it's future and they're job would be in doubt. Sorenson would take the job and give it 110 percent . He deserves a shot before it's all said and done with UAA hockey.  UAA has nothing to lose  and everything to gain.