I urge seriously-interested parties to read the decision in its entirety, as I did. I've been used to having the anti-TMT arguments appear unopposed in the media, and even though I thought in most cases they were weak or unsupported, or simply false, it wasn't until I read the decision that I was able to see how truly weak many of the objections were. In particular, I was struck by how few of the environmental objections held water, as it were, being based on fundamental misunderstandings of geology, hydrology, and so on. 

And some of the loudest (and in my view, most self-important) protestors were shown to have approximately zero training or expertise training in the issues that they had been complaining about. 

But why believe me? If this case is important to you, locate the document and read it -- at least skim it.

I don't know about posting links here, but if you search for "783-Hearing-Officers-Proposal.pdf" you'll find it.