So, since you can't rebut my point logically,  you dismiss it as being"lame"? Deniers have regularly presented economists, political "scientists", medical doctors, engineers and long retired, non-research scientists in the wrong fields  as "experts" on the subject of climate. These have little more than a doctorate in their field to impress the easily impressed and manipulated. This is the method that has been employed for decades by Pruitt and his ilk to discredit legitimate climate science for personal gain.