Tom, Vic's analysis was admittedly simple and it was done for the whole state. That's because it would be impossible to factor in all of the variables you've mentioned for the entire state over a 20-year period. Way too many moving parts. But intensive management proponents promised more moose, caribou and deer in the statewide harvest and it's fair to measure the program's success for moose by looking at the increase in harvest over a 20-year period. It's also fair to figure out how much each additional moose, caribou and deer cost the state and re-assess intensive management based on its costs and benefits.