We can love the world of reports & data & facts'n'figures.
This shows Lynnwood HAD the info, but wouldn't abide by the rules by having it available. Even in years of being asked. Many times even?
But what is still missing is the data BEFORE the installation of the cameras.
How 'bout also posting the five years BEFORE at those same intersections?
And, how 'bout posting ten years of data of the next eleven worst intersections for a control group, for comparison of your project's effectiveness?
With 10 years of relevant data, wouldn't that affirm the "value" of your project?
That would give a citizen, too, a chance at considering truth in the situation.
But, even with what Lynnwood has provided, one can see it INCREASED accidents in at least one intersection!
Golly, who would have thought that possible?!
If a reader puts the reports into spreadsheet for comparison, note the order of the locations is different in at least one report. Print them out and use a hi-liter!