No, this is not what Mr. Burke commented playing a “shell game” with. Please see my earlier comment that begins with: On Page 8. 
Facts behind the “deficiency” ALJ Dublin reffered to were this:1) On Aug 1, 2016, Ms. Goschen executed agreements that committed the Port to a 10 yr lease;2) in December 2016 the Port received a fair market rent appraisal on the subject bldng. The appraisal indicated a higher rent than what Ms. Goschen committed the Port to in August;3) after the Port rcvd the appraisal, I became aware of EDA grant award conditions that required the Port charge fair market rent;4) On Jan 9, 2017, I reported the issue of the deficiency between the 8/1/16 lease/mou agreements and what the appraisal indicated it should be. That deficiency was $70K+, of which I suggested to the commissioners and Ms. Goschen the Port pass along to the CRTC;5) in reply to my suggestion, Mr. Burke suggested we “play a shell game to account for the money”. I reported this to HR on 1/23 and was out