More false claims from James.

1.  The only dental fluorosis which may be attributable to fluoridated water is mild to very mild, a barely detectable effect which causes no adversity on cosmetics, form, function, or health of teeth.  This level of dental fluorosis is neither "enamel damage" nor does it require any treatment whatsoever.

2.  The "41% of all children" is a complete misrepresentation of a 2010 CDC study by Beltran-Aguilar in which 41% of adolescents examined showed signs of dental fluorosis.  This consisted of 37.1% with mild dental fluorosis, 3.8% moderate, and negligible severe, with the moderate being attributable  to improper ingestion of toothpaste, and/or exposure to high levels of environmental or well-water fluoride during teeth developing years of 0-8.

As can be seen, James provides yet further example of the dishonesty which is rife amongst antifluoridationists.

Steven D. Slott, DDS