'Loved the article ....'
You and other commentators only 'loved' it and thought it a fine piece of journalism and satire because it coincides with your view of the man, guilty or innocent. This SAME group of people - I don't know if you, Douglas, are among them - react in outrage and with insults when their favourite personalities and politicians are similarly panned. 
This piece - it's NOT 'analysis' as the headline purports - is squarely opinion, which is always subjective and not necessarily fact-based. The writer's (and DM's) PC heart is clearly on her sleeve as she throws objectivity out the window and becomes unprofessionally personal. She's disingenuous and naive for believing just because, understandably, Jordaan won't respond to her/DM's questions and thereby doing what they imagine everybody should do, he's guilty as alleged, NOT charged. 
This is typical Davis - putting the PC cart before the horse - not Pulitzer prize-winning material.