Bycatch, how am I over my head when I am making a clearly stated argument which this Kefka character repeatedly refuses to even acknowledge?  And just where, exactly, in the discussion have I or am I being disingenuous?  

I feel like I am in a house of mirrors here, trying to argue logically with this willfully slippery and evasive person who quibbles over technicalities and semantic minutia instead of the real issue at hand.  He has over and over refused to address my argument or the fact that many European nations, as well as the USA, are currently subject to a historically unprecedented and unsustainable number of what we may collectively call "migrants", the particular legal status of any given one being irrelevant to the discussion and merely a diversion from the fact and degree of that influx.