Interesting, I read the proposed law. So your view is that habitual and openly displayed erotic proclivities or novel gender-role enactors whose manifest proclivities are obnoxious to persons following the most ancient of religious traditions must be imposed upon people against their will in close private quarters or in religious assemblies.  Without laws like those proposed there are good citizens liable to lose their economic livelihood or be foreced to violate their religious beliefs.  There is a real conflict here between privacy rights, the right of free association, and the general public-accommodation rights of others. There are exceptions and conditions in the proposed laws that handle the practical aspects:  reasonable accommodation, alternate venues and vendors, etc.  Liberty under law does not mean that all things are accessible to all people...there are circumstances in which religious liberty is at risk. You wouldn't understand that, though, would you, or even try.