Am curious, the climate discussions seem to be centered on truth vs. untruth, and arguments over that (for me a tremendous waste of resource).
Given truth, what is the best course of action for a person? And, what will be its effect?
Given untruth, what is that which is lost if the best course of action is wrong? What opportunity won't be worked on?
It seems that arguments over that which is done or not done would be much more useful than arguments over the truth.
But then, would those articles be published? Would anyone march?