"KPMG’s quality controls when investigating the SARS investigative unit made out as “rogue” were “not performed to the standard we expect”. For example, the report “was not subjected to second partner review”."

I think that at least two years have gone by since that KPMG SARS report first saw the light of day. Let us accept that the report prior to publication / leaking was not "subjected to second partner review" as fact. That was two years ago and I would like to know if there has been any effort made anywhere within KPMG to undertake that important review during the subsequent period in the full public knowledge that the report was utter bullsh!(. Even those who dwell under a rock know about that infamous report. If it was subsequently reviewed then  why did they not tell the people of SA about the outcome of the review. Their failure to do so taints all concerned just as badly as the people who authored the initial report and no apology will ever mitigate that.