Clark has used her son in photo-ops to buffer her viper-like personality traits since the day he was born. More than 16 million dollars was spent on partisan ads to promote Clark. One would think that if a child is going to be used as part of a corrupt politicians ad campaign - considering it an ethical gray zone, prudent journalism would consider, "Is this in the best interests of the child?" "Is there potential for harm - emotional, psychological, social?" Clark has used her mommy hood and images of her son for self promotion like she is the Queen and he is the Prince of the Province. But we don't have Royalty in Canada do we? She is a polarizing Premier because she courts the extreme. The extreme juxtaposition of how important her child is - when BC has consistently had the highest child poverty and children dying in government care. The fact that the media continues to praise and exalt this lawless woman who brought us black corruption is beyond comprehension.