I made no such suggestion.

As I understand it, the courts have thus far ordered and upheld the suspension on the ground that Trump's order infringed on the state rights of Washington and Minnesota. What hasn't formed part of the legal arguments so far is whether or not a president has the power to do so when national security is it at stake. That fuller review of the order would occur at the Supreme Court level under appeal.

So the question is, does Trump have a hope of convincing the court that his order is necessary for national security? I wouldn't rule it out.