You can't say "quack science and alt-facts" without actually disputing any of the facts I presented. 

The reality or otherwise of climate change is a straw man. For the record, I don't deny its reality; I question the predictions of future catastrophe, and whether it is good policy to try to mitigate climate change. But that's beside the point. 

At issue here is whether there is a significant climate change signature to be found in Harvey or Irma, and more generally, whether the frequency and intensity of tropical storms show any upward trend at all. There isn't, and they don't.