Assuming that you are replying to me (hard to tell with the new system), you are mistaken. Science is initiated and conducted with concluding findings unknown. That is kind of the point of initiating and conducting science. There is absolutely no requirement for anything in science needing to fit with anyone's idea of right or wrong, only that the science is sound and adds to existing knowledge.

I have never attempted to pass any laws. That's not within my job description. And I'm kind of partial to science. Why would I want to make it illegal?

Nor have I ever indicated that governmental (or any) pressure or censorship is acceptable. Quite the opposite, I believe that interference with academic freedom and the pursuit of unfettered science is untenable.

Please do not misrepresent my positions. That's rather uncivil.