Too, Kalakaua et. al. show meandering royal genealogy lacking kuamoo being interrupted in MATRIARCHAL birthright to Moana-kane, as the best association with Kamehameha's Kanaloakuaana legacy.  Worse, Kalakaua claimed ruling authority to Pilikaeaea, the Tahitian migrant who squatted without permission from the natives or Ke Akua.  The Kawananakoa lineal claims today are further degraded by this Kalakaua attachment.  Very many Hawaiians looked upon Kamehameha as a usurping low level alii, and never abdicated to him.  Descendants of those Hawaiians exist today, and consequenty, never abdicated to Liliuokalani or the U.S. as well.  Personally otherwise, all humans are damaged goods, especially priests, queens and kings.  So, I don't apply ad hominem truths when testing a claimant's cultural rights due lineal authority, indigenous place, inalienable birthright, and aboriginal precedent (being a jerk is immaterial)...which is how I similarly analyze matters of US annexation.