Needless objection.  Author is talking about something that happened to someone's GRANDDAUGHTER in the 1960's.  I graduated high school the same year as Lovelyin.  Only one of my maternal grandmother's generation is still alive, her youngest sister, and none of my paternal grandparent's generation.  The article attributes its information to a surviving witness of the same generation--perhaps the only one.  It is responsible journalism to interview witnesses and attribute sources when possible, and this may be one of the last remaining sources familiar with that incident still with us.  It's noteworthy.

Now a question for you--what was YOUR purpose in making an issue of this?  If I can reason it out, one would expect you'd be able to as well.  Or was this an underhanded attempt on your part to express "wet feet/pyramid-sighting" syndrome, i.e. being deep in deNile?  And yes, this was in part intended to help you understand your objection's lack of merit by directing the same at you.