Trampling the rights of ordinary Canadians on behalf of a politically important lobby could be called progress I suppose. Throwing out fundamental scientific objectivity is certainly not though. While Jordan Petersons protestations regarding the legal ramifications of this legislation were eagerly debated by all and sundry- with all the usual name calling and insinuations of genocide and human rights abuses heaped on top for good measure- the legal ramifications of this legislation are still about as clear as mud with so many obfuscating on the interpretations of it and with the ground work laid, the work of setting precedents can now begin in earnest. The fact though that so many stepped forward to make their efforts at correcting his interpretation of this legislation while not one of the individual people or organizations or entire academic departments that he offered up debate to regarding the science this legislation is based on speaks for itself. That debate is now illegal.