The Second Amendment doesn't mention guns, firearms, or any other weapon specifically. It mentions arms, and qualifies the right to keep and use them to only a "well regulated militia". Currently the Supreme Court has ruled that means that municipalities don't have the right to ban use of firearms by citizens, a right that was taken for granted for a hundred years. A future Supreme Court could overturn al prior interpretations, just as the Roberts court did. Any right can be qualified, as the First Amendment has been. The majority of US citizens would go along with strict limits on possession and use of firearms. At some point this will have to happen. The NRA is really screwing up by opposing all restrictions. The NRA should be working toward sensible regulation that would reduce gun deaths and save honest competent gun owners from outright confiscation. The "cold, dead hand" death fantasy is truly stupid.