I think that is a tenuous connection to facts. With that reasoning couldn't you substitute practically any naturally occurring substance? mercury has a much longer history of being a healing substance than fluoride does, so why are we not rubbing mercury on our skin and ingesting it today? It was barely over 100 years ago we still used mercury in that manner.

If you're being paid to write this, please just admit it and register another account. You've sung the song of the appeal to authority numerous times and also self-identified as being part of group whose key principal beyond non-aggression is anti-authority. You reject a creator, but praise a vaguely-defined wise and benevolent group of caretakers for the masses.

I view these as contradictions, do they reconcile in your mind as a consistent view? If they don't, and you're being kept in a windowless basement forced to litter the Internet with platitudes towards anyone in a position of authority...now is the time to escape!