As this editorial points out UNDRIP and the jurisprudence on s. 35 are at loggerheads. (By the way, what is the basis for the assertion that the current government "increasingly sounds like it wants to embrace UNDRIP more in principle than in law.". If memory serves did the current justice minister not assert that Canadian law must be brought into line with UNDRIP.).

I wonder if it might be important for the PM to clarify this whole issue. Not as important as posing for the cover of Rolling Stone, admittedly, but important nevertheless.