Any generalization carries pros and cons that can be used to advantage or misused harmfully.

If I see cogent arguments supporting Vancouver's justification in pretending that petroleum production, refining, shipping and end uses are not a fundamental part of Vancouver's economic existence, I will rethink my view of Mr. Mason's generalization.

Until then, the 'idyllic little bubble' comment captures the essence of what I see coming from Vancouverites who like to enjoy life's benefits but develop short arms when it's time to absorb the related costs.