It's as if the only way to go forward is to change history to something that more palatable and everyone agree to do it.
Ms. Freeland didn't simply INCLUDE necessary spending in the military.  The investment is to ENABLE a more independent foreign policy. And this spending doesn't come close to doing that.
To say that this doesn't replace the U.S. "not even one bit"denies the entire context of how this has been presented. Everything that's happening budget wise is to replace the U.S. to some vague degree. Never mind "one tiny bit".
Two percent spending "tomorrow" or any time in the near future. Canada committed to work toward a 2% goal in the next decade. But why is NATO and 2% even being reported here?  Does everyone just sort of agree among yourselves that NATO has something to do with the new budget even though its never been mentioned by anyone involved?
You've changed the entire basis for spending 60 billion dollars to something you made up.