I understand what the Oklahoma Law states and their intent to discourage criminals, but how would the prosecution prove their case of Motive and Intent to Kill with Murder in the 1st Degree for the Driver when its her accomplices of the robbery that are killed..........and not the victim of the robbery gone bad?   I can fully understand convicting her for Murder in the 1st Degree if the Victim of the Robbery was killed, but she's definitely guilty of something, like an accessory to commit 1st Degree Armed Robbery, or being that she may have planned the Robbery something more serious.  I really would like to see the outcome of this trial.  If she's convicted of 1st Degree Murder, I'd be the first one to acknowledge I was wrong.