I don't really see the point of the article.

Guilfolye thinks that the Liberals might increase the capital gains inclusion rate. Well, what's so special about what he thinks? Anyone can guess what the government will do with the inclusion rate.

Second, more to the point, you'd think that someone who is as smart as Guilfolye supposedly is, would act smarter than Guilfoyle did. 

There was plenty of opportunities in stocks in the 2008 bottom to make 2-4 times your money, without using leverage. And there are probably plenty of people out there who did. 

So who cares if Guilfolye was able to borrow a quarter million at 3%. Plenty of people can go out and mortgage their house at 3%. There are probably many who can borrow against their stocks that rate. Why not interview someone who really thought things through, looked carefully at the stocks they were buying, themselves, and doubled their money without borrowing? Why not interview someone who acted really smart, not just semi-smart.