Voice-of-Reason, I'm sorry you don't seem to grasp the difference in importance between a professional slight vs a national security issue. Perhaps you would see things differently if you had a son involved in taking out Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (not that I currently do either, but others do) who was put at risk because the NY Times wanted to break a story. How many more will that madman kill between when we could have gotten him and our next chance to take him out? But as I said, Mr. Scavino still owes Mr. Stephens an apology. No one likes to see lies published about them, and they were unnecessary and petty.