Morrigan, with respect, I understand your own point regarding the 'Getting More Money for Government' aspect of it. 

I really do.

But this is NOT about more Government, but about safety, as frankly, more Government would not be needed withing this case, as it would be so by hiring more police officers to concentrate upon said issues raised.

And I fully agree that the fiscal penalty allocated unto the red light runner should be fined at least ten times, or more, the amount currently utilized.

This is not 'photo radar' within its true usage, determining speed, but 'photo proof' within a singular incident, as in unlawfully running a red light, unto which the recipient of said penalty may appeal, as is their own right to do so.

Whilst this is about money, it is, within case, not about money taken by the Government, but about money paid by the red light runner so as to make them think about it before they do it again.

The less it occurs, the less money goes to the Government.

No?