No, it wasn't, which was why I included the caveat that focus on "old Charlie's" accountability  wasn't the author's intent.  What I said was that there's absolutely no evidence in the article that he DID "repent", and suggesting he did was mere speculation for which there's NO factual basis.  All we know is that he was still principal when the young lady (now my age) graduated.  So at best Griffin got away with it.  The glass isn't half-full, it's cracked, empty and coated with dust.  You may have seen 'em "change for the better."  I haven't.  At best they've gone in the closet.