That's not exactly reasonable, Andi. When they talk about "changing culture" you can't exactly say any current US religion is driving such changes. Religions pretty much stay the same, it's what they do.

Most of these rates started their big climbs in the '60s. Those massive cultural upheavals, despite their motives, were not all for the good. Nor are even what seem like objectively positive cultural changes in some ways not without long-term negative side effects in others.

Cultural change is a tricky thing and not always positive in and of itself, which is why slow evolution is usually safer than forcing it. Which is the root of philosophical conservatism, not stasis, but a recognition societies evolve in ways over time for complex reasons that it is unwise to summarily dismiss and ignore.