In light of the confirmation that the information about Freeland's family was, rather than anyone's disinformation campaign, actually authentic, solid, and factual reporting, what does that say concerning G&M, who just yesterday wrote a baseless article trying to force the impression that this information was not credible... without ever providing a piece of evidence or single argument to back that suggestion up?
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/freeland-warns-canadians-to-beware-of-russian-disinformation/article34227707/
Obviously, we now see that G&M were just throwing out false assertions to try to push readers to assume a conclusion that the information about Freeland's family's Nazi history was false, without presenting any argument for it, and while ultimately being wrong in the assertions that they presented to their readers.
Doesn't that mean that G&M were propagandizing?