Agreed. The document is extremely mild and respectful. It makes heavy use of the current scientific literature - which may or may not be accurate - but that's beside the point. It's  a closely reasoned piece and goes out of its way to avoid any kind of bias. Incredibly, one of the reasons Danmore says he originally circulated it was  to give fellow employees a chance to critique it and let him know  if he wasn't in his own "echo chamber". Amazing Orwellian response by Google.