You totally miss the point, as seems to be your wont.  The question about the cake references the issue of participation, not whether it occurred in Colorado.
 
Once again, we've been over all this; he was not choosing to act or not based on their "class".  That is not his claim.  He has stated his reason, and it is up to the court, not you, to decide whether his claim is valid. 

He HAS quit making wedding cakes for the time being and has suffered significant loss of income from that source. That is damage, ...in his view, from an illegal regulation. 

Since you're going to keep dragging out the same red herrings, I'll no longer bother to respond to you.