I agree but Ivo, perhaps like many of those who disagree with the model (in his reply above to me he kinda concedes it IS a valid model), uses emotive and insulting language to describe those advocating it and who have accepted it, ie the majority of the world - scientists, businesses, politicians and ordinary people. I think they resort to excessive language, not because their views are ignored or derided - when there are opposing paradigms one will come in for a bit of stick; ask Galileo - but because their positions are weak. 
Tell me Les (and Ivo), how much time and evidence will be needed to prove or disprove it - 20, 50, 100 years? Imagine Ivo an old man of 80 or 90 - what, 40 or 50 years from now? - telling anyone who cares to listen: 'That climate change, young man, is unscientific, fearmongering lies', I tell you!', while parts of the world are racked by flood and other parts desert, like a fictional dystopian world.