Oh so now you know what I am thinking. No Petrus, I am asking questions about the lawsuit. I have never once stated I am right. If you have evidence to prove that then produce it.If you don't then aren't you being as defamatory as you say the plaintiff is? Aren't you engaged in an attack with no proof? 

Now if I were to say "Petrus, based on the tenor of your comments, I think you are either insane or just a raging attack dog" then I would need to back that statement up with some proof no matter what my personal feelings on the matter or it would be defamatory.

For your information I have not made up my mind that SNAP is wrong. I want to know why the plaintiff waited four years to file the suit. I want to see if there are any other emails that she has. I want to know what the circumstances are of her leaving (Clohessy said she quit, Blaine didn't comment). 

What I have made my mind up upon is that you just keep attacking without offering any proof of the attack.