It's not inflammatory nonsense, it's easily verifiable fact that any reader can confirm for herself. At the time you wrote, "My question seeking proof of the original post in this thread ("Bana Alabed" has been widely debunked.") has been my only input on this issue..." you had in fact made three inputs to the issue. Two comments were made within this very thread, and you down-voted a separate comment on this same issue. All of those three inputs are made to comments that are challenging the honesty of the "Bana Alabed" Twitter feed.

So now that you've spoken untruthfully, and then denied doing so while attempting to cover it up, why not just answer the simple question that was put to you? Why are you prepared to believe that Bana Alabed is for real?