I was wondering the same thing. I'm a 'concealed carry guy,' as well. Somehow, I've been able to think and act in a reasonable manner for several decades. What's unreasonable, according to the United States Constitution, and, equally as pertinent to the gun-hater whose comment you replied to, the Colorado Revised Statutes, there is no shifting burden when determining criminal guilt simply because a firearm has been alleged to be part of the crime. People who like to yell and scream, make excuses, and offer false narratives (My favorite was from yesterday - the rain in the Atlanta suburbs is what kept the voters inside, who, but for said weather, would have voted for the Democrat who had $30,000,000 in outside campaign contributions donated to him- really!! lol) like to make such claims, but they forget that these claims are factually impossible when actually considering Constitutional safeguards. I have no idea if this guy is guilty or not, but I'll certainly respect his rights.