At what point do we hold the private landlords of Masi to account? The fact is that the majority of Masi sites are privately owned, single residential zoned, but these owners cram 10-12 shacks on a plot with no services, thereby contributing to the fire and service crisis. Just because surrounding wetlands are vacant, it does not mean that it is suitable for housing. Do you really believe that opening surrounding land will reduce density in Masi, think again.