This could just be more scapegoating by the Democrats over their election loss, in the form of a trumped-up case, enabled by a power- and money-seeking security establishment. After all, we've seen that play before.

Even the FBI's and Homeland Security's latest "evidence", taken at face value, doesn't prove interference by a foreign state. Anyone could have written it. Its weight depends entirely on the credibility of the agencies offering it. However, their past sins over Iraq's WMD, their warlike view of Russia, and a reputation both for telling their masters what they want to hear and for exaggerating foreign threats in pursuit of expanded budgets and powers, have undermined their credibility quite severely. They can't have it both ways.

It's also deeply ironic. Liberals defend Snowden, Wikileaks et al as people who simply expose the truth of official wrongdoing. The DNC leakers did the same, but liberals treat them as enemies of the state. It looks like a double standard to me.