The Board carefully listed its reasons backing its "godsend" branding. You don't challenge the validity of those reasons, but instead raise your distaste for the policies of the DUP. The difference is that the Boards rationale is based on real disasters avoided, and your rationale is based on policies that the junior member of an unofficial collation will not be able to translate to reality. 

Since most of us prefer to consider real possibilities such as those the Board raises, rather then fear of ideas that have not more chance than the proverbial snowball, the Board's opinion is, IMHO, more relevant than yours.