". . . And how would you know what she comments on or what she likes or disagrees with outside this article. Are all her comments available for you to see? Or are you reading every G&M article and keeping score?"
~ ~
That is a very good question, indeed.

Perhaps that is the reason why almost every comment produced by this person includes **the commenter addressee's name** embedded within the body of the textual reply; which apparently should not be the case, as per G&M staff as 'Civil' moderation performed by the G&M readership is supposed to be a 'name blind' appraisal...

It could be that including **the commenter addressee's name** within the 'reply' allows for an indexing system to be built which gives this abovementioned person more control over the personal history & personal nature of the individual & narrative which points to manipulative personal  inference --where the targeted commenter becomes the subject matter...

Contrivance & Collusion... Now, that's pure manipulation..