Wholeheartedly agree with your comment. There is no ban, nor any evidence that townspeople who voted against a zoning change behaved in any way that was discriminatory.  

The author of this article should be embarrassed that its underlying premise - the existence or even threat of a ban - is without any basis in fact. And the two posters who support the author should be embarrassed along with him. The residents of the town bear no responsibility for the activities of a group that believes cemeteries should be open to people of all faiths. 

I have absolutely no problem with the people of any faith having their own cemetery. But the notion they should be able to force a town to change its zoning bylaws to accommodate them is arrogant and presumptuous in the extreme.

This political correctness run amok.