Despite what Khadr's lawyer argues: this issue is not about the constitution nor civil right but the initiation of "terrorism" and the military procedures that detained him and or its tactics for such procedure. As many have pointed out his retribution was his release, where this legal pressure is coming from  and why, is the real question?  As some lawyers have already argued, the constitution does not walk, Canada owns him nothing for his self-serving military or political activity that actually pitted his family against our forces. He was a captured military prisoner who participated against our forces.