Marlene Drew waived her  right to be guardian/trustee.  (look at Guardianship docket on-line)  Why?

She knew there was money – she was responsible for the two kids for several years – what explains her inaction?

A more important question is what relationship did the Kealohas have to the family.  Typically a stranger is not appointed so why Katherine.

The indictment says that RT was 12 and AT was 10 in 2004.  RT would have become an adult 6 years later or 2010.  AT would have become one 8 years later in 2012.  

If the reporter looked at the court records it would be helpful to post Kealoha’s  Final Accountings.   The records show a final accounting filed  9/13/10 and a supplemental addendum to it filed 8/12/11 both with beneficiary approval.

The Office of Disciplnary Counsel is so very far down the list of places to go for help.  What did these people do for themselves?