Mr. Hall - In an effort to see that the record in this matter is accurate, please use your idle time to ascertain actual facts before posting misrepresentative (internet troll like) statements. 
First, please read RCW 42.41.040 wherein you will find steps a “whistleblower” must take in order to seek relief under the chapter. 
Next, should you have truly read my Petition for Judicial Review, you would’ve found I requested four alternatives for relief, giving the presiding Superior Court Judge a wide range of award options from zero dollars up to vast dollars and imposition of maximum penalty on the Port and those person at the Port deemed to have retaliated against me. 
In closing, while it’s true the PDN’s article is somewhat misleading (unless one digs deeper), your comments are unambiguously misrepresentative. Again, if you’re truly interested in the actual facts about this matter, please use your idle time to ensure your posted comments are accurate. 
Thank you...