He also represents the state and the constitution,. And article 8. You know,  the one about the best benefit and we shouldn`t give our oil away etc and the like?  
Subsidizing companies with cash,  that produce no oil, who can then sell that "cash credit value" to say, Exxon, or Conoco, who can use it against their direct costs in a profitable TAX-OWING  completely separate field, even though they were not involved with and have no investment in the new field`s exploration at all! 
Nor does the "migrating" credits encourage any production in the original field that was explored and leased, thereby completely removing the necessity to develop the oil that was intended.  What a deal!!
  ...while they work our legislature with their gerrymandered buds.  Rep. Grenn shouldn't vote a certain way because you say he represents your so-called majority`s opinion on an issue.  The constitution and what`s right matter even more as far as what`s a "best benefit" with our finite resources.