Wrongfully influencing? I suppose that is a rather subjective threshold, wouldn't you agree? After all, the illiberals believe every executive action under the current administration is "wrongful", and the Jeffersonian liberals believe the same about the former administration. That's a fair summary, so whose definition of "wrongful" would be applied here, especially in light of the actions of members of Congress and the appointed heads of various executive branch offices with regards to the NFL's tax exemptions and the use of "Redskins" for a team name in 2014? No, such subjective boundaries are not codified in law, there is an objective definition of "wrongful" contained in the legislation that was conveniently absent from your premise.  Care to share with all what it is, or will you leave it to others to expose your intentional omission?