You disagreed with my post but didn't explain why. The losing candidate (who complains about money in politics) spent 6 times as much as the winning candidate and also had vocal support from hollywood. My point was that dumping a bunch of money on a terrible candidate who lives 3 miles out of district might be a tactical error. I think the results agree with my assessment.

As for discerning voters, I do agree. Did you see the number of people who voted for hillary? She won the popular vote so your point is well made.