Your certainty average Canadians understand the reasoning of the 9 judges is perhaps justified, given opposition to the Khadr settlement runs about 70 -80% against.  Also understandable is your refusal to headnote the effusions from the SCC (which Conrad Black recently aptly described as "infested by judges intoxicated by the Charter") as deciphering the Charterspeak they employ is daunting.

Perhaps, then, you'll accept a lesser challenge - detail how the "serious Charter violations by our government's officials" in any way, shape or form "contributed to (Khadr's) 10+ years detention" which I believe was a consequence of his blowing up a US medic years before any such official could have possibly violated any such right.