Compiling 350 papers, possibly cherry picked, written by a scientific community that is predisposed to arrive at a predetermined outcome and labels any colleague who may dissent as a climate heretic and runs them out of the business (i.e. Judith Curry) is hardly a report worth using to make policy much less spend tax dollars supporting such policy.

Tell me what the plan to change climate is, how much it will influence climate, how much will it cost our economy, how many lives will it cost, and how will our lives be any better?

Quite frankly, there is great disagreement in the scientific community regarding the degree to which the climate is changing, and they cannot tell us what part of that, if any, is human caused. If climate change is largely not human caused, we would be far better off not crippling our economy so we will have more resources with which to adapt to whatever climate change happens. Making the correct choice is critical, and flawed science makes our situation worse.