They don't give the mic to guys like that anymore; his non-absolutist appeal to reason and his refusal to judge others provokes independent thought, rather than trying to push any kind of predetermined viewpoint.  Wallace even asked him a series of leading questions, and openly commented on the fact that he wasn't giving back any kind of definitive answers, but rather leading the listener to draw their own conclusions on the subject, while emphasising process and open-mindedness.

Today's audience, used to a constant barrage of propaganda, are going to have to dust off their critical thinking faculty to really understand this guy, and if they do they're going to learn something important about politics, religion, and the media right now---About the lack of substance in our battles as in our dialogue:  The lack of any real national conversation about anything of import.  Instead we're kept fighting over crumbs in the bottom of the fast-food bag.

Thanks.