Jeffrey, that's an odd use of percentages. For one thing, it doesn't account for the magnitude of differences above and below 7,000. Vic's analysis did a better job of illustrating the significance of intensive management. IM increased the number of moose harvested by 143 during the two periods, which is less than 2%. Vic estimates about 5,000 more hunters during the latter period, which should have increased harvests by more than 143 moose, if the moose were available. IM is a costly experiment that doesn't seem to be working as planned.