"I see it along the lines of the analogy you just answered."
I asked you to explain what your point with the analogy was, what the analogy is supposed to mean, and it seems like you're just telling me the analogy has meaning.  What meaning?  What's your point with the analogy?  I still don't understand.

"Russia broke into the DNC and then posted their findings publicly via Wikileaks."
Thanks for restating the obvious.  That isn't exactly helpful in explaining how interpret that and calling me partisan is even worse.

"When fed these questions, do you REALLY think that Clinton made that distinction?"
When did this discussion become about specific conduct by any particular party?  The closest I came was pointing out how BOTH PARTIES, not just the one you want to focus on.  You asked me previously "What are we talking about here."  I thought it was about Russian intervention but it seems you want to castigate Hillary and the DNC instead of talking about what we are talking about.