"Police spokeswoman Christina Judd said the new policy does not allow for implied consent for any party and requires a warrant or consent."
     Well how adorable of them to change their policy to comport with the LAW! What an arrogant press release, saying essentially, "after further review, we have decided that we will now stop breaking the law. Though the Supreme Court decided, last year, that the government MUST have a warrant, absent consent or actual and articuloble exigency, in order to draw blood, we just felt that this law applied to us, or to our policy... but now, we totally do!"
Seriously??? This is no different than saying, "Though it is illegal to shoot people in the head for standing too close to the street on Wednesday afternoons, our department has just been doing it cuz we like it. But, now that someone told us we can't do it anymore (since we got caught) we're going to go ahead and stop."  Extreme comparison? Yes. Accurate comparison? Yes.