skin color is involuntary. Sexual orientation is made up and only pc. Just because anyone wants approval for what they do and claim to be sexually, does NOT mean it is discriminatory to refuse to approve and serve. The Baker has rights that are violated by being forced to comply with laws that are NOT Constitutional and violate the Baker's rights. A baker is NOT subject to "regulation of commerce" and your non argument is false. The meaning to regulate when the Constitution "empowered" Congress with it, meant "make regular (more uniform). It has been used to excess to interfere with economy and stifle liberty, but it is NOT used in this context at ALL. The anti discrimination laws attempting to prevent "discrimination" based on race has been ridiculously expanded to include LGBTQI and that has been expanded to force approval of lifestyle choices, not tolerance. Nothing is so intolerant than an LGBTQI demanding approval.