All good questions, Thomas. I attended one of the informational (sales) meetings for this project and came away with mixed reaction. While it makes sense to make sure the workforce is able to live where they work & we apparently do need more 'affordable' housing, I believe some of the job numbers offered seemed to contain several assumptions. Some questions asked at the meeting (by would-be neighbors) particularly regarding the water issue, were met with arrogance. If I understood correctly, the proposed site isn't in the UGA yet, but is outside the JPA. Can't tell from maps. As far as the '41 recommendations' of the Housing Task Force that Jason mentions, I believe many are absolutely necessary & doable, but am wary of recommended increased property taxes for the county to buy MORE property for subsidized housing. Let's not confuse facilitating growth of for-profit AFFORDABLE housing (used to be call real estate) market with creating non-profit, taxpayer subsidized housing. Two issues