Moving to a more advanced case. Lets use Graham versus Connor, the court case that established the use of force regulations for police officer. In it states that a police officer may be subjected to a situation that tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving. Anyone that has been in a fight understands that things happen that you don't fully comprehend and you have to act. So a police officer pulls up to a scene where gunshots have been heard. Upon arrival at the scene he witnesses multiple dead bodies and notices someone beating another person. The police officer assumes that the person giving the beating is the suspect and shoots him. As the investigation continues it turns out that the person beating the other person actually took down the original shooter. Under the law, by approaching it by the books, the police officer assaulted an innocent individual who was defending himself, although savagely beating someone else. Is the police officer right or wrong when others had been killed?