The wilfully uninformed views of a career politician should not be viewed as equivalent to those of an informed scientist, not to mention in comparison to a global consensus of scientific experts; especially when that wilfully uninformed politician has personally profited from opposing science and fact for personal gain.  The fact that Pruitt can't understand the science does not equate to a statement that the science is not settled.

There's perhaps some hope remaining for the planet and for the US in particular if we can agree that unbiased scientific experts may have more credibility around issues of science than completely compromised and self-serving politicians.  Pruitt should stick to matters of baseball, perhaps.