You yourself switch to operating costs from rail construction costs. What about that? 

For your information construction cost have remain stable at an 8.2 billion projection for over a year. We're just talking about the amount of insurance or contingency funding. 

Why don't you talk about contingency funding instead of mixing it up with actual construction cost projections? What about that? And isn't it lying by saying that construction cost projections have changed when that isn't the case?