It's a difficult balance and so tenuous that it might be better to avoid the situation altogether.

On one hand, yes, it does make sense to ask the experts, although I would be curious to see if they acknowledge that some of their colleagues on the woolsack are as much a part of the problem as anyone else in the system because of their refusal to enforce the existing rules of procedure.  Some of them allow lawyers to get away with far too much.

On the other hand, when the judiciary and the government make nice, more red flags should go up than are seen in Tiananmen Square on May Day.

Let the Canadian Judicial Council (or some such independent body) write any necessary laws or amendments, and the government just rubber stamp and enact them.  I can't think of anything useful that a pack of self-interested politicians could contribute.