Dr. Slott, I and others are concerned about the misuse of scientific evidence and the completely fabricated claims of fluoridation opponents (FOs).  Exposing the absence of legitimate evidence, the biased editing of research conclusions and the invention of “convenient facts” justifies the investment of time.  

It is important for the public to understand that the legitimate evidence – backed by the consensus of most experts in the appropriate health or scientific fields – supports community water fluoridation as a safe and effective public health initiative.

It is important to demonstrate that FOs are unable to provide evidence to support their claims.

For example, neither you nor James Reeves have provided the specific quotes I requested from the Choi, et all, Malin & Till, or Peckham, et al. studies where the authors actually concluded that their research prove that drinking optimally fluoridated water causes those problems.  Why not?   Because the authors made no such claims.