Typical self-righteous reactionary preaching and posturing.

Publishing a draft EIS is an "outrageous violation of the environment?"  Not really.  That's the way the process works.  Reasonable people may disagree with the Navy's plan, and they certainly have a point.

But "The people" don't want it?  I think you mean SOME people don't want it.  The Navy wouldn't be pursuing this if the elected CNMI government hadn't at least signaled its willingness to consider it.  
Some people don't want the military buildup on Guam either, but they don't speak for everyone.  And you certainly don't either.

"Diplomacy through non-violence" sounds fabulous and the US pursues it constantly.  But history and common sense show that it doesn't always work out and there is no substitution for military preparedness.  Where do you propose that military exercises be held?  

If you have no realistic alternative, you have no answer.