All temperature dataset analyses are routinely updated. Spencer and Christy's own UAH set is on version 6. It's not really difficult to predict that a new version of a temperature analysis will be released. Your "fraud" bit is just absurd libel resulting from your own ignorance of the subject.

The backstory here is a bit interesting. There are about a half dozen surface dataset providers, and two primary "satellite" (MSU) dataset providers, RSS and UAH. The surface and MSU sets were roughly in agreement regarding trends, except for RSS, which ran cold. Rejectionists loved citing RSS. This likely irked rejectionists Spencer and Christy, as their own set ran warmer. Suddenly, UAH v6 becomes a clone of RSS...complete with its known cold bias. In the meantime, RSS were busy attempting to solve those known issues, and apparently have with version 4.

So, no accusation of fraud for rejectionists Spencer and Christy for their overt altering of their own data?