Then you should understand the frustration of this kind of non-transparent censorship system, where the rules are unclear and you have to second-guess what may or may not be acceptable, etc.

BTW, The NYT's system is clear and consistent. A few months ago they invited readers to take a test, acting as censors applying the guidelines. I got a perfect score, clear rules are easy to apply. But this system is kafkaesque, we're all trying to second-guess the censors, and any real-life government application is likely to be too.

The difference is that your views are the officially approved ones, so you are on the right side of power, authority, etc. You may occasionally get censored here, but you have no fear of getting in serious trouble with The Authorities and suffering disastrous personal consequences on your life, your job, etc.