He most certainly did NOT follow policy.  Even a rookie cop knows that Implied Consent does not apply in that situation.  "Payne’s written report says he wanted the sample to show the victim did nothing wrong".  That is NOT what implied consent is for, "Implied consent assumes that a person with a driver’s license has given approval for blood draws, alcohol breath screenings or other tests if there’s reason to believe the driver is under the influence".  The cop himself said he believed the driver DID NOTHING WRONG.  Since he did not arrest her (good thing because she broke no law and he had no probable cause...it is NOT against the law to refuse an unlawful order) he most assuredly did move her from one place to another without her consent.  At the very least that is false imprisonment...at the worst it's kidnapping.