(1) I referred to both animals, and dietary needs of the vast majority of humanity throughout history.

(2) Your deflection doesn't address those who humanely kill animals for food.

(3) You questioned my remark about animal welfare extremists (PETA, HSUS, etc.).  It isn't just about feral cats.  Animal welfare extremists are proving to be significant threats to conservation--example, they held up feral goat eradication on the Catalina Islands in federal court for 20 years, while said goats ate the ground cover down to its roots, causing erosion which silted-in nearshore marine habitat, and drove numerous endemic plant and animal species to near-extinction.  Since the 'no-kill' imbeciles lost in court, the goats were exterminated and most, but not all, of said species have recovered.  Many more examples.

(4) Your unrealistic value-judgments don't apply to animals or humans that for many reasons have little or no dietary choice.  They have to eat what they can, and what they can get.