Don Quixote thought like you too. I'm not a believer in the infallibility of science, the modern age's 'god', but until you produce an alternative theory and model that can be tested - refuted or confirmed  - against the evidence, and because climate change is a science it must be in the language of science (mathematics) and follow the accepted precepts of science, you're just a guy with an opinion and a conspiracy theory. 'Guilt-tripping', 'fearmongering'. Really?
Climate change is a scientific model that happens to be accepted by the world. Sure, there are those who believe different but the proof - so far - is in the evidence. Paradigms rise and fall, and others become 'laws' because they're irrefutable. Climate change as a provable paradigm has gained ascendancy until shown otherwise. You've personalised this - check out the emotive language - and I don't know why. Do you have shares in carbon-based industries? Therefore, your objectivity is suspect.