Kind of a strange headline that he "vows" to appeal....anytime he "vows" it is dishonest.  Fact is, he has no choice but to appeal at this point, and the Court may well reversed.  However, he stuck his foot in it again in Tennessee when he said " this is a watered down version of the first one,,,,,and I prefer the first one"....there is debate over using his campaign speeches and Guilliani to interpret the bill......it is an important legal point.....BUT, he said that now as a SITTING PRESIDENT, not as a candidate, and he opened up the door with his big mouth for the Court to now consider that....and IF they do, it increases the chances of the Court upholding the injunction.  He should have, as usual...kept his big "so called" mouth shut.