I wonder what it means when the article has the terms Open Society, and Illiberal Democracy, in quotes. Anybody? Meanwhile, I'll take my interpretation of 'Open Society' to equate more or less to reductio ad absurdum: to argue for a so called open society in my view is to abrogate society all together - for what is a society other than the agreed upon inclusion & EXCLUSION of others, others whom the society has deemed either worthy or unworthy to join it. So you have a 100 room mansion on top of the Kilimanjaro, AND a big heart? Nevertheless you'd be wise to screen knockers at your door seeking shelter during the great flood, because some people are for better or worse still using their hands as toilet paper, and do you really need an outbreak of cholera right now?