He's guilty. Here's why: First, he's a concealed-carry guy. That puts him in league with a bunch of nut cases. However, this alone is not enough. Second, he's feeding squirrels on a full-time basis (a no-no). Third, he's feeding them peanuts, which is an allergen to children in his neighborhood. Fourth, his neighbors don't want him to do it, but he persists, nevertheless. Fifth, he's doing it to commune with the dead (cuckoo!). Fifth, he places flyers everywhere to explain his craziness. Sixth, he shot an unarmed man. Seventh, he shot him in the back. Eighth he sustained no injuries.

No single fact is enough to convict him. Facts six through eight are the most damning. If you want to be authorized to carry a firearm, you must be highly accountable for the actions taken with it. Any hint of impropriety should be viewed through a lens that assumes you acted as such. The burden should then be on you to rebut the presumption, and it should be a heavy burden.