"What's your point with the analogy? I still don't understand."
Please reread my 2nd paragraph and see the correlation between what you wrote and what I wrote. If you still don't see the connection, idk what to say.
.
The partisan reference is mainly because you seem to think that the activities the DNC engaged in aren't worth discussing but the Russian hack is. To me, they are the same offense. We need to handle them differently because of the parties believed to be involved. Still, I think there should be full investigations into both situations with appropriate actions to all discovered participants.
.
"When did this discussion become about specific conduct by any particular party?" You offered this in defense of the DNC actions: "Especially when they do it with a completely private process, a party primary, rather than a public national election".
.
You say that you are pointing out BOTH parties, I haven't gotten that impression. Its funny that that is what I've been trying to do.