I live in Port Angeles and was never given this survey that has sparked this whole debate.  A survey given to a small portion of the community is not a statistically accurate tool for measuring what the entire population wants.  I have read all the comments people make for and against on the PDN website everyday.  From an outsiders prospective, I can see where the writer's point of view comes from.  I mean, the minute the mayor votes against the fluoridation of water in Port Angeles, an ethics complaint against him is dropped?  Well, that seems like a scare tactic to me.  I don't have any scientific background or insights into the pros and cons of fluoride in water and haven't taken the time to familiarize myself with them...but it seems that this debate is more like a fight between two sisters arguing over whose turn it is to take the garbage out.  I wish there was more respectful debating on the issue.  That's it just my opinion, I could be wrong...