1. Is there a reason why such developments cannot happen now? Mayor Caldwell testified to the State Legislators that the State of Hawaii owned a lot of land along the Honolulu Rail Corridor. 

2. Why not begin vertical rental apartments to help solve the homeless and housing crisis? The Singapore government provided rental rates at 25% of occupant's income.

3. Will this private-public partnership force private owners along the rail corridor to be victims of eminent domain where the government can seize their properties? Is it moral and ethical for government to seize from a small private property owner to provide "LAND ASSEMBLY" to another private developers to build?

4. What is the bottom line? Are there really positive tax revenues for the government? Who will pay for the needed infrastructure like water, sewer, traffic mitigation, schools, safety protection etc that are needed for new developments? How much tax credits are developers expecting? REALLY, what is the bottom line?