Writing on church isn't the same as dealing with and reconciling involved moral teaching and utterings.

The Church has taught in various documents that persons who are validly married and who now live with another not as brother or sister but with sexual relations cannot receive communion. 

Can they be absolved while they still are in this sinful state?

Crammed into a footnote (351) by Francis’s author of AL (Francis himself has said he doesn’t remember that footnote!!) seemingly allows for that second married couple to have intercourse and to have communion. 

So how can established Church teaching and AL both be right.

Is Francis’s silence in essence a dismissal of the Law of Non-Contradiction?

Is prior Church teaching wrong?

How, precisely, can both be right?   

Wuerl hasn't answered these questions (and handful of others) ..neither has Schonborn.  Neither has the pope. and Walford certainly hasn't either. 

Confusion is increasing. Dismissing it won't make it go away.