"The National Institute of Mental Health, argues that the DSM represents an unscientific and subjective system.   There are ongoing issues concerning the validity and reliability of the diagnostic categories; the reliance on superficial symptoms; the use of artificial dividing lines between categories and from "normality"; possible cultural bias; and medicalization of human distress. The publication of the DSM, with tightly guarded copyrights, now makes APA over $5 million a year, historically totaling over $100 million."

Would you care to rebut the NIH argument with something other than your own opinion?  Are all those World Health Organization (WHO) folks just misguided?