Again, Alceste, you seem awfully quick to ascribe things to malice when they are simply matters of fact.

It is public knowledge that Khadr has been living at his counsel's home since he obtained leave from prison in 2015; room & board would be a reasonable expense/reimbursement, if so sought.  (and nothing more is inferred/implied).

The fact remains that a number of the Khadr cases did establish precedents and have already been cited in other cases.  Insofar as any financial remedies go for the Charter violations, in my opinion, it would have been preferable to have them fully adjudicated by the Court to establish proper benchmarks.  

As it stands today, the amounts given to Khadr are grossly disproportionate to other awards for death, pain/suffering, quadriplegia etc. established in Canadian jurisprudence.   The public interest outweighed any alleged savings from the settlement.