The ONLY fundamental constitutional rights we Native Hawaiians have are those acknowledged as guaranteed in the State Constitution Article 12...only as interpreted by Hawaii's courts since 1978 -- which are actually quite narrow, allowing for Amano's crafted reconciliation piece.  Many of us incorrectly assume that being Native Hawaiian and choosing to practice culture are enough to establish our constitutional fundamental right.  Many converged upon Mauna Kea incorrectly presuming this in mind.  And, non-native Mr. Sinkin's shortfall analysis, as if a constitutionally protected practitioner, merely muddies legal application.  Instead, the entirely opposite alternative is to trump everything by claiming sovereign rights due illegal U.S. occupation of the islands.  Mixing of these two different forums more often produces confused intellect rather than clear comparative thought.  Sad.