Question.  Are we really talking about a landlord rejecting a renter because of income source, or are we talking about a landlord rejecting a tenant due to not passing the vetting process outside of income source, and potential renters citing income discrimination as the reason for being rejected?    After All I have yet to see a rental here in Kent that wasn't filled with low income renters.  In fact if we want to talk about discrimination protection, how about disallowing middle class workers from being rejected from  rentals because they simply make too MUCH money?  Just how backwards must this city become before people finally see whats really going on here?