I'm not saying that the rules, as they stand, aren't fair. I already told you that Trump was legitimately elected. I was not in favor of electors changing their votes. It's the rules that I want changed for the future, not this particular election's results. I truly don't believe that Clinton would have been a good leader for this country, which is why I voted for neither of them.

Mob rule implies that people are violent or unruly. You seem to automatically want to assume that majority = mob, which is fallacious. Mob rule doesn't apply in the scenario we're talking about. If the popular vote had elected Clinton, what would be mob-like about that? Nearly 3 million more people makes an election suddenly one of mob-rule? What about Al Gore's popular vote lead of just over 500,000? That's suddenly mob-rule? No. It's majority rule. One person, one vote. Just like every other election the US.