A question that could do with analysis by economists & public discussion is:  Which has the greatest positive economic impact in Alaska, distribution of the full $2K+ to be spent by Alaskans as they need or choose or the state spending (or investing) these dollars?  The taking of over one half of the dividend occurred just as Permanent Fund investments began to seriously pay off.  Couple that with the zero earnings year timing out of the five year averaging that is used to calculate the dividend and we get the potential payout as described in the article.

I would prefer a strongly progressive income tax, a simple equal $ 'Head Tax' on everyone in Alaska for more than say 3 days (out of state workers (oil,mining & fishers), tourists, & soldiers & their dependents - everyone at about $100 or $200 per year), and a carbon or other energy tax based upon BTU content.
      Thank-you