Where do you get off saying -that-? No, letting people die because you don't care to allow the regulators to function and regulate harmful drugs like sugar in the food supply or even raise the alarm of the dangers to health and wellness that high-fructose diets constitute is what I think is functionally sociopathic. I'd further posit that to do so is illiberal, irrational, and irresponsible, given the evidence.

How can someone take personal responsibility if they are not cognizant of the danger? Isn't there a public role for raising the alarm and preventing a corporation from setting up a dietary marketplace that fails the best enlightened interests of the public? Should they be allowed to mislead people into believing soda is healthful and safe and no cause for concern? Or are you just punishing people for misplacing faith in the subverted and fallen Federal institutions once erected to protect them so long ago in another simpler era when integrity still had a policymaking seat?