Umm Petrus, I don't have anything to do with the Hammond case. Unless you are one of the defendants then neither do you. So why would that litigation prove that my comments are abuse and harassment? What does that case have to do with my assertion that you attack without proof and your counter assertion that I am abusing and harassing you?  Now you are engaging in a total non-sequitur and trying to flag anything I say that is contrary to you.

What is the matter with you?