In the investment business, it's called putting good money after bad.  Agree with Mr. Lee “Whatever alternative that you look at, if the ridership diminishes to the point where it’s not going to significantly diminish traffic and it’s just going to raise the operating costs of rail, then all you’ve done is saddle the taxpayer with more cost with no benefit.”  Pretty profound words I'd say.  The gap between revenue and costs will be hugely negative I'm betting.  Not good,and if so, a heavy burden for future generations.  Hoping that the HART Board deliberates without past prejudices, and comes to a thoughtful conclusion.