Since my one-word reply ("What?") was rated below the civility threshold, let me ask a longer question:

What is an "indigenous ruling" and how do yesterday's two rulings put an end to it? 

Bonus questions: Do I gather that that your first sentence has something to do with  the SCC rulings that Canada violated Omar Khadr's fundamental rights? And if so, isn't saying that's relevant to this issue a bit of a stretch?