Very well stated. 

Most people have no clue what happens in college tribunals. They assume a school would not suspend or expel a student without just cause, but when you start to read the narratives of many of these cases, you realize that is exactly what is happening. Only worse.

Amherst just recently settled a lawsuit with a student it expelled nearly 3 years ago. The investigator seemed to intentionally ignore and avoid available evidence that proved him innocent. When the John Doe obtained the evidence himself simply by asking the people who had it (Which he was prohibited from doing while under investigation) he was told too bad by the college, which doesn't want to admit fault. The evidence showed that not only did his accuser lie about the alleged rape, it proved she had violated the code of conduct since John Doe was blackout drunk.

Now, Amherst has revised it's policy, not to make it more fair, but to make it harder to sue. 
Help is needed by Fed Gov.