Why is this still about Harper?   Because of people like you as well as the fact that the CPC is still the party of Harper.

Secondly, Layla4 raised the issue of tax credits for political donations.    That makes Harper especially relevant, since his reasoning for eliminating the per-vote subsidy was because "tax payers should not have to fund political parties."    It was a blatant lie, since he left the more expensive tax credits in place.    In other words (in case you STILL don't understand) - the tax credits mean tax payers are still funding MORE than the per vote subsidy.

Any other questions?