Why not address toxic agri-business that contributes tremendously to climate change? Why not provide for what you remove from sustainable use by Native People so casually in this pretense of concern for the environment? Sure, under ESA rich Americans can still go and head hunt two elephants a year, even with the big fund raising beasts supposedly on the brink of extinction. The Baka who were evicted from their lands and even killed for conservation of elephants, who now live in dire poverty alongside the roads, have a thing or two to teach us about conservation. 
A premature listing in the ESA will destroy the sustainable subsistence based arts and crafts products market of people without providing for an alternative to self reliance. The public has been conditioned to think of all hunting as murder by these wealthy "non-profits" whose food comes in styrofoam and plastic, will end co-management by Tribes, who've been successful for countless centuries in conservation of environment.