Please consider: there are two trails being muddled here. Yes, the agencies and individuals have determined there was Russian involvement of some degree. How are they comfortable making those statements? Because of investigations.
Those same investigations have also failed to produce any evidence of collusion between Trump or any of his agents.
Are we to accept only the first part of the findings, because it feeds the agenda of opposition?
Or do we admit that this isn't a first; Russia isn't the only, and we do it, too.
Now what?