Ironically everything you claim is "undeniable" is actually completely deniable, you've completely misunderstood the legislation.

For starters, U of T said "probable", so you're trying to spin that into a definitive statement when clearly it's not. The Peterson matter happened prior to this legislation passing so you can't claim U of T's letter is a result of Bill C-16, which protects marginalized people and not any one scientific theory. The only thing people are being "forced" to do is treat others with respect and dignity. 

You haven't provided any evidence that this bill makes debate illegal, but I suppose that your statement "legal or otherwise" is as close as we'll get to you admitting that your initial assertion is false.