Your first word should have been "Some" and you should replace "non-" with "less significant". Then you should have noted that these are vanishingly rare and will be for quite some time. All the while, wind and solar decrease in price.

You present no math for me to find incomprehensible. Where are your cost estimates that show 4G to be cheaper than solar and wind in 2030 (when we can expect them)? You're betting your future on what are essentially large lab experiments. Wind and solar are cheaper than nukes today and will remain so. They are cheaper than coal and on an equally unsubsidized basis, gas. 

Re the NR article, the panels are not emitting hazardous waste, NR just cites improper disposal. As with production, blame those who act poorly, not the panel itself, which is essentially entirely recyclable (at the end of its four decades or more of service).