I don't think it will Mike.

SNAP can't afford to back down on this one (they never have before) and I don't think the plaintiff's attorney will given that they have made their reputation as whistle blower attorneys. 

I hope it doesn't. I think we need to see the evidence from both sides because the stakes for survivors are high here. If a group was exploiting them, then that needs to stop. If the RCC has manufactured this entire case to close that group then that needs to be brought out into the open and the hierarchy behind it exposed. 

If Petrus is right and Hammond was a spy then I want to see who hired her just as much as I want to see the trail that leads from election meddling back to the Kremlin (which I am sure we never will because I've noticed how discussion about that bi-partisan commission seems to have gone eerily silent since the inauguration.)