I get that impression by the aversion to say anything about the DNC. Also, what I interpret as complacency to their actions. I literally read "when they do it with a completely private process" "Its none of your business if they are honest". Finally, accusing my of lying in the manner you did suggests an agenda.
.
It's not bias against the DNC as a whole, its a dislike for what a few members in the DNC may have done. Hillary may be completely innocent idk, I would like for an investigation to look into it and determine if 1) any laws were actually broken. 2) who the players were 3) handle it accordingly. I would also like for them to look into the Russian hack to determine the same there. (Which they are already doing it appears) Its clear to me that our priorities are different as to which is more important, so far though, it appears to me that you don't think we should look into the DNC thing at all though. Its really a moot point since we have the resources to look into both.