Continued:

Otto_G - You and other fluoridation opponents are free to propose other safe, beneficial, methods of protecting dental health in a community that are cost effective and safe.

However, you and they have a responsibility to present accurate, legitimate evidence to justify your/their position and not inaccurate, misleading fear-mongering.  Nearly all claims employed by fluoridation opponents to promote their fear-laced agenda have been severely edited to increase the fear-factor and easily sway public opinion.

You have continued to dodge my question, What evidence do you have that the representatives of these 100 organizations have not done “honest research” and come to the conclusion that fluoridation with silicofluorides is both safe and effective.

I will continue to accept the conclusions of experts over the opinions of non-experts who seem to have significant biases, "do their own research"  and come to a contrary conclusion.