You mean the more the 'settled science' folks decide to try and pursue laws to silence any dissent from their 'settled science' with criminal charges the more any reasonable person says that is a good indication that the science is not so settled as the proponents are suggesting.  The more that they try to FORCE everyone to believe it or else the less convincing that they are.  The fact is that so many political policies are dependent entirely upon the alarmists conclusions being 100% accurate and any 'challenge' to the accuracy must be destroyed outright because the policy can and would change if the science was more questionable.

Plain terms if the science isn't certain then the prescripted cure of government control and loss of personal freedom have no support. It would be like chicken little selling 'supports' for the sky and then running around claiming the sky was falling. When someone points out the sky isn't falling the market rightly disappears for sky 'supports' fraud.