"Tiny Homes" are not a solution, they are at most a band-aid for developing on unsuitable-to-service land and oddly shaped lots (think about those triangle-shaped lots near highways/rail ROW's) where an RV is not more appropriate.

If some cities want to build a hybrid Mobile-home/Tiny-Home park, that's perfectly fine, but a more suitable outcome for major cities would be to convert a parking garage-type structure instead of trying squat on some piece of land that will inevitably be redeveloped into condos. For example, if Tiny homes were allowed on that Concord-Pacific space that they have yet to develop the buildings and park for, then that land doesn't get to be used for the Cirque Du Soleil either. We're in such a rush to develop the remaining free land with inadequate density (see all that stuff down Terminal) that a Tiny Home park would be a large step backwards. It's expensive enough to lease a mobile home or moor a floathome, why pretend this solution won't be?