Dan, you shifted your hollow man argument of your physically disabled person's acceptance into a 'well-regulated militia' to Heller- hollow man argument that failed now evolving into an activist SC interpretation of 2A.   As mentioned by others, the SC had historically never promoted a broad definition of 2A for good reason- it was outside the decades of foundation to limit SC's subjective opinions.    

Reagan was against open carry as well as 'liberal' sales of 'assault' weapons.  “I do not believe in taking away the right of the citizen for sporting, for hunting and so forth or home defense. But I do believe an AK-47 is not a sporting weapon nor needed for home defense.”

Lets ask a simple question, Dan.  Do you believe that Adam Lonza should have owned or had ready access to firearms?