There was nothing uncivil about my post. I used the term "Alternative Facts," which is you regard that as uncivil, I would point out it was coined by the current administration. Brian posted revisionist claptrap, like the Uranium One claims that, when actually examined, show nothing like what he and the Republicans claimed about Hillary or the Clinton Foundation. In other words, all of it was untrue, nothing more than polemic. It was all argued out during the last campaign and, frankly, that was its only purpose -- to obfuscate and confuse during the campaign in order to achieve political advantage and bolster the "crooked Hillary" narrative while meanwhile Trump actually was doing worse stuff.