Many of those with whom I post on climate threads link to science sites and can hardly be said to be "rabid" by any stretch of the imagination. You definitely haven't proven your assertion, can you? I think it is a weak basis for an argument on this subject anyway since you would need to prove the science is wrong to discredit Climate Theory. I sincerely doubt you or a thousand deniers have the scientific chops to even make a credible attempt.

Have you ever heard of the Dunning-Kruger neurological study that examines the peculiar tendency of some to feel they know more than experts in a field when in reality they haven't more than the most basic knowledge?

http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/lessons-from-dunning-kruger/