Let's say a family has 7 kids, and another family has 6 kids, and they move to a remote area 100 miles out of any current village (but within a school district). Let's say they build a school out of ply wood and request for school funding (because they now collectively have 13 kids), would the state be obligated to fund the school? 
There are villages with fewer than 10 kids and they have the option 1) send the kids to Mt. Edgecumb
Or 2) homeschool

I am actually a huge fan of Mt. Edgecumb and I have seen many successful students from the villages receive educations that propel them into college (where village education propels them into drugs/depression). 
Getting kids out of the village is a GREAT thing, and if they decide to return to the village more educated great. However, sending village kids to a larger city (Sitka) only increases their resolve and fortitude to achieve a greater life. I don't understand why this is even up for discussion. Don't have 50 kids = no school funding.