"Legate85's" very first sentence contains a very obvious misreading of my post, to which he/she purports to reply.  Worse still, he/she assumes the existence of alternative facts which are not in evidence, and will never be unless Ms. Hammond and her "greedy attorneys" get them into court.  In essence, "Legate85" is attempting to argue the bishops' case against SNAP, episcopal transparency and accountability!  And you're so right -- "it is built on nothing"