It appears as if the ASD speaks with a forked tongue. Re its comment, " legislation is unconstitutional by spending public money for the direct benefit of a private educational institution." How does the ASD justify spending public money for the direct benefit of Sylvan Learning Centers?  It also seems as though the ASD does not act to the benefit of certain students until pressure is applied from outside the institution. Maybe the ASD could have used the $45,000 it used to promote school bonds instead to educate these students! ASD motto: "It's the money, stupid."