I did not imply any such thing, but you can read it any way you want. But I always find it humorous when a President is blamed for budget deficits, when the Constitution clearly grants fiduciary responsibility to Congress, and in particular the House of Representatives. Why are we not focusing our attention on the Party in control of the purse strings? And you are right, Clinton does not deserve that much credit for "balancing" the budget.... I don't agree the whole thing will collapse, it can be fixed when the concept of "honest brokers" returns between the two parties, replacing the corruption we currently have in place.