Wholly agree with Martin and Paul, the CRTC is way behind when it comes to adapting telecommunication policy to the needs of 5G networks and services. Regulation hindering efficient allocation of resources such as spectrum are only one side of the problem. The other side, as demonstrated by the recent Videotron zero-rating decision, is pricing. Not only differentiated services mean differentiated value for network bytes, but the cost of providing this byte with a 1ms latency can be one order of magnitude higher, from a network utilization perspective, than the cost of providing it "best-effort". So even if sticking to its current cost+ pricing paradigm (for tariffed services), the Canadian regulator is clinging to economic fallacies that will kneecap 5G investment from the get-go. In fact it is  so far behind in its thinking, that it is hard to imagine how our industry can recover from such medieval vision - especially when the US FCC is finally starting to see the light!