Yes, I'm beginning to realize that.  They say that in their description that "investigative" is only a portion of what they do.  So it's a  "local columnist's perspective."   Now I see what you mean.  This gave me pause to realize that I do the same thing when I post blogs about the Attorney General' Notary Office failing to protect Hawaii notaries and the consumer public.  The difference being that the dysfunction of the Notary Office is truly nonpartisan because it hasn't changed no matter which "party" was in office.

So, I accept that it is the writer's opinion, in this case Chad's.  He is certainly entitled to his opinion (didn't mean to suggest otherwise Chad), I just have had a totally wrong  understanding of what CB's purpose is.  I still don't see how it was not "partisan" but then it's entirely possible I also don't understand what "partisan" and "non-partisan" mean.  Perhaps someone could tell me how the opinion would have looked it if were partisan?  

I apologize Chad.