Canada complains it is the market working without explaining the full situation, that they subsidize the lower price for this product by paying higher than normal prices for the other half of the product which is protected under their agreements.

Canada made this change while the US was rattling its sabers and CETA was originally signed, relying on being technically compliant while substantively offside.

The question is why we would create this problem during sensitive negotiations to appease a small group of Cdn producers who are already protected from free trade and subsidized by consumers.