That's an insufficient conception of pro-life under any measure of Catholic social teaching, as folks like Charles Camosy have consistently argued. Would you consider it sufficient if a conservative Catholic defined anti-poverty efforts as simply including economic growth? I doubt it. 

Further, several persons associated (or formerly associated) with Network quite explicitly oppose efforts to legally restrict abortion. And during the original dust-up with the contraception mandate, when lots of Catholic groups across the spectrum urged the White House to change its language, Network was silent. I think being silent is a cop out (just as I think it is when a conservative Catholic takes a similar approach to something like climate change or poverty).