I have a pretty good understanding of case law on this subject.  What part would you like to discuss?  Haida?  Tsilqotin?  I've read them all.

Your position is contradictory.  On the one hand you cite Canadian law and you use it to your advantage, but when it has no advantage you retreat to Eagle down.  

They are not your lands.  Various aboriginal groups claim rights and title but in only one case (Tsilqotin) has title been recognized, and even then for only a small part of what was claimed.

Clearly we are at an impasse here.