Randy, you beg the question. The proof of your own assertion is on your head, not mine, especially when you are the one arguing for forcing an undesirable on others. When my assertion was submitted that your logic is in question, you are understandably defensive. But you avoid my own argument entirely: after people do their own research whereby many, if not a majority (contrary to your claim), conclude something to be hazardous, it is unethical to force it into everyone's drinking water, claiming it as a systemic "medicine," and then without significant reason (i.e. teeth?). It is illogical.

"Public health programs [should be] implemented for the overall benefit of the citizens." They should. But what is the motivation for this program, in particular, to be forced indiscriminately?