It "fits" for all the wrong reasons:
- Due to the oddball voting structure Bombardiers shareholders have no say
- The company would have changed if it needed to, but they keep getting bailed out by government
- The executives "succeeded" brilliantly in their goal of extracting government funding, so how is it in any way wrong to state that they aren't performing?

The executives brought in close to $3B in government-backed funding over the past 2 years, much of which will flow right into the hands of the Bombardier/Beaudoin family coffers who are the only voting shareholders. 

So the voting shareholders received gobs of money and redirected some of that many back to the executives that got them that money.  How did they do anything wrong?

The real question you should be asking is "Why did our governments give them gobs of money in the first place?"  We *KNEW* that this was exactly what was going to happen.

The blame rests 100% in the Federal and Quebec governments.