[Fairness isn't about playing "favorites."]
You honestly believe it is fair to censor speech that you feel offended or disrespected here?  Anyone can claim they are offended or disrespected so who is supposed to judge what are valid claims and not?  And how are they going to make those judgments without opening themselves to "playing favorites?"
IMO, it is wiser, when it comes to speech, to run a free hand than to deal with the ever escalating issue of what is "offensive, "hateful," etc. as there are always new situations and new circumstances that will require a new review of the rules and standards to be "fair" to those who are about to be censored.  Even the Supreme Court is reticent to determine what is and isn't "fair" when it comes to speech and approach the issue from an oblique angle of what is and is not "protected" rather than what is "fair."
This is an interesting topic for discussion and I want to continue it but I'm going to busy so it'll likely be a while before I respond