Actually, science proves many things, but these things are always under specified conditions and assumptions. I guaranty you are right now touching something that is proof of this. But climatologists have the great disadvantage of working with a deck short of most of the cards, as they work with inherently chaotic systems, don't know many of the conditions and therefore have to assume far to much. They know this, but have found it useful for funding purposes to make increasingly alarmist conclusions. Fear keeps the funds flowing, mostly from our government while under liberal control. That may change now on the federal level. How much do you suppose our state paid for this report, and will they pay again next year as they have two previous times even though there will be little difference in climate by then?