Completely agree with your sentiments. As well, I wonder if there was any discussion or argument against this project as it was finally agreed to? This article only presents one side of the decision process, leaving it to select members of the public to investigate and scratch for the "truth" behind what we're being presented with by politicians and their minions that are notoriously misleading. I've had experience with the "Y" before and they are not known to be a reliable business partner. Another instance of using tax payer money/assets, without consent of the taxpayers, to fund another  business (believe me, the "Y" is a full fledged business) that can't otherwise afford to do what it wants.