They act like they can just walk on the LIO building lease......  I'm no lawyer, but I hate to think the state can just walk.  There were representations made by state officials as to the authority of the lease when it was signed.  Those same type of representations, or similar at least, are found in the agent-client relationship law.   The only question is, how much due diligence did the LIO building owners have to perform?  If they legally performed enough, then they are due a substantial amount of money. Wouldn't it make more sense to stay put, then to have to pay for the old and the new? 

Dear Bill Walker or your legal counsel: Please reply to John/Jane Q Alaskan Citizen.