The only thing I might add to Mooney's letter is the fact that the building was named for Deady after the man was dead - when he could do no more for the University than he had already done. 

He didn't help found and lead the University for 20 years just so he could see a building named after him.  It was named after him - after he was gone - by the people who best knew of his singular contribution.

Can the current regents possibly now know more than those who had similar duties at the time?