I wonder why this seemingly small detail wasn't mentioned in the article yesterday which inferred that some moose hater was randomly shooting moose in Anchorage?

Perhaps in the frenzy to instill more anger and hatred or just to get an article in print, the journalist(?) who wrote the previous story, just forgot to get all of the facts?  Seems to happen all too frequently in most media accounts all across this nation.  Pretty disgusting really because in most cases these are not true journalists, just bloggers who voice their opinions as factual news when it is not.

If my memory serves, the previous story of "3" moose shootings was at the top of the page.  Now the retraction/clarification is at the bottom.  Really sad because "News" used to be the actual Who, What, Where and When 'facts'.