Your reflexive partisanship is extraordinary. Hannity was the example used by Kingwell to illustrate the standard browbeating, bad faith dealing of pundits who engage in "interrupting, raising [their] voice and deliberately misunderstanding interlocutors."

I have advocated nothing here. I am merely pondering whether or not Kingwell has a legitimate point in questioning the efficacy of giving access to unfettered speech to people, like Hannity, who have demonstrated repeatedly that they have no interest in objective reality when it conflicts with their poisonous agenda or ideology (i.e. "pizzagate," "Seth Rich" etc. etc.). 

I have no idea what you mean by this sentence: "Your Voltarian moral high is built upon the corpses of the millions killed by Marxists dictators" — perhaps you could parse it for me.

FYI I have lived under both fascist juntas and communist dictatorships — your hyperpartisanship comes across as a childish indulgence nurtured in privilege.