Too funny.  In your long winded "I know what I am talking about" response about shots on goal, you of course neglected to address the core point of my argument...that your key point was that "3 shots in the SO and NOT 1 - NOT 1 was on net.  Talk about not being able to hit the broad side of the barn".  That description is hardly reflective of all 3 shots that clanged off the post.  But hey, I can appreciate you wanting to ignore the key point and talk about periphery issues like the technical definition of a shot on goal. Of course, technically speaking you did not use "shots on goal"...you talked about shots on net.  But hey, why worry about facts when you can instead hurl an insult.

Not sure where in my post, I remained "sunny and optimistic".  If challenging you with equating "not hitting the broad side of a barn" with shots that clang off the post and cross bar is considered "sunny and optimistic", then you have funny logic....but that is evident from your posts.