Well said.  The only counter-argument is that there is some sort of silent conspiracy among climate change scientists who fear they will lose their jobs or funding if their research is not in line with the scientific consensus.  This argument assumes a monumental failure in the progress of science (theories, peer reviewed articles, reasonable debate etc. etc. - applies to all science, not just climate science).  It is without any foundation - on a par with 911 conspiracy theories, creationism and the like.