Much factual data has been printed showing private property values and their suffered costs of fire damage over the past years.  This data only concerns the issues of an owner's financial responsibility for his investment and assuring the quiet enjoyment of his neighbors.  I've yet to see printed data depicting the public's costs for city services having responded to the sprinkerless condo buildings over the same sample years.  That data is material to whether it's feasible that government tax the public to subsidize those private condo owners.  Let's be intelligent and appropriately apply facts to their correct issues.  Going forward, let's not confuse or misuse the facts as lawyers creatively would.