Zinke is well educated, huh? So what explains his written support of a Montana group that espoused armed resistance against the federal government? Or his denial of climate change even as there is consensus among climate scientists based on scientific evidence? You can make the absurd claim that my ideology is the reason I view Zinke as unqualified for that cabinet position, but I presented facts to show he is objectively unqualified. Do you know the difference between facts and opinions?

You make claims about Trump vetting his choices "quite well" yet offer no supporting facts. And your claim that "almost no pollster or pundit" gave Trump a chance to win the election is false. It's you who isn't paying attention. Remember Trump's promise to "build the wall"? It's not going to happen. Remember his promise to not have "insiders" in his cabinet? Do you think a member of Congress is an outsider? What about Wall Street CEOs? Or former generals? Pay closer attention to facts, they matter.