No, I think you're confusing hyperbole with passion, and measured commentary with dispassion. Again, I emphasize that the point of this discussion is not to make incendiary generalizations about fossil fuels, because we are all guilty of using it and or profiting from it. The focus instead should be on real solutions, not PR gimmicks or stunts, which I believe Olson is engaged in; and her using children to gain a higher profile professionally as an attorney is borderline unethical. What's the point of suing the Obama administration, which committed the U.S. to the Paris accords and recently negotiated with China on reducing emissions? Real progress is being made because millions of dedicated and engaged citizens and dozens of organizations around the world have petitioned and persuaded governments to act. Their work should also be the focus this discussion, not Olson's media publicity stunt, which is a waste of time and taxpayer money and contributes nothing substantive or meaningful.