First in an earlier post you write "And Trump's attempts to stop immigration from certain other countries was ruled unconstitutional by judges"

Now your claiming "He says a lot of things with no actual plan on how to accomplish it."

So if there is/was " no actual [Trump] plan " as you claim. Then reasonable logic would suggest judges had absolutely no need to make a ruling claiming  "unconstitutional" anything, at least according to your thinking because after all there is/was "no actual plan". 

I will stick with the known facts "Trump is on record during his campaign with his call for "Extreme Vetting" of immigrants long before the November 2016 Presidential."