I didn't criticize the Herald for posting stories about the national march - I specifically pointed out the incongruity of covering a tiny local march that involves a fraction of the populace.  And if you need proof of editorial positioning, take a look at the picture that accompanies this story - it was taken from a spot in which the "crowd" filled the frame as opposed to being taken from further back and exposing more of the empty space the "crowd" occupied.  One is favorable to the "marchers"...the other, not so much.   The so called "fourth estate" is but a shell of its former self...and I don't just mean the Herald.  Honestly, it's sad to watch.