Kudos to "Deckard" for pointing out that the R-G backed the Seneca/EWEB power deal from day one. The R-G argued that Seneca's biomass power was needed to help EWEB meet state-imposed renewable power standards. Not so then. Not so now. Not so in the future. EWEB's overwhelming (>75%) use of hydropower has always assured it exceeds the state's renewable energy mandate. Incompetence or corruption? How can one tell the difference?