While you know nothing about Laurent Stefani, we know a lot about Callista Gingrich:
- She was no garden-variety adulteress; she was engaged in a relationship with a married man for six years. (Stefani did not commit adultery.)
- The adulterous relationship ended the marriage of the man with whom she committed adultery. (Stefani has not broken up any marriages or families.)
- She married her partner in adultery, one of the sleaziest politicians in Washington for the past 40 years.
Did she repent? Who knows? Is she still cheating? Who knows? Is he still cheating? Who knows? But if past is prologue... We have more information about Gingrich than about Stefani with which do draw inferences.
I don't think any of this is relevant to Gingrich's nomination to serve as an ambassador. What is relevant is experience and accomplishments in diplomacy; on that score, Stefani wins hands down. But they're not competing for the position.
Your posts begin with your bigotry and lead you to fabrication.