In what universe is Tony Wolters "a better hitter than both Hanigan and Jonathan Lucroy"? That's an absolutely ridiculous statement... Wolters is a second-year player, he has had a bad year hitting .248 with a .642 OPS. Last year his BA was a decent .259 with a .723 OPS, buoyed by a strong second half.

This year is Lucroy's worst offensive year of his career (.242, .635) but for his career he's a .280 hitter with a .771 OPS. But if we're throwing out Wolters' bad 2017 it's only fair to throw out Lucroy's also... last season Lucroy hit .292 with an .855 OPS, well above what Wolters accomplished. So Wolters is not really any better this year, was a substantial ways behind Lucroy last year, and has nothing anywhere near Lucroy's career highlights to show what he can do at his best.

I like Wolters a lot, but he has a long way to go before he can be considered Lucroy's equal offensively, and farther still before he can be declared to be better, either at present or overall.