1. No, I certainly did not "point out" that Canada's integration process is "more successful" than those in the European countries. Stop putting words in my mouth.

2. No, obviously I do not agree that immigration screening is a part of the integration process, if I had thought that, hello, I would not have carefully separated the two in my previous comments.

3. The fact that I am correct, that immigration screening is logically not to be considered part of the integration process, is evident if you read the article today about the vehicle incident in Sweden. He was a rejected refugee applicant and was thus legally not supposed to be in Sweden, the report states. By your (erroneous) lumping-together approach, his being in Sweden was somehow a failure of the integration process of Sweden. No, wrong, it was a failure in the area of immigration screening. The two are emphatically not the same, and no, the latter is not the step in the former. They are separate and different processes.