Maybe, if Google was actually advertising the stolen product. But providing information about where to find something -- or information about it existing at all -- is different from advertising.

This event in isolation may not seem like a big deal. But it is part of a worrying trend of countries trying to impose law extra-territorially. The danger is that net users will only have access to whatever information remains after every country has carved out its own bit of censorship. Like the EU's ridiculous "right to be forgotten", the UK's suppression of content that promotes/glorifies terror, the Thai government's censorship of critical opinions against their royal family, Pakistan's attack on blasphemy, and so on. If Canada demands Google comply with this court order, how can it object to every other country similarly demanding that Google comply with their even worse laws?