“In its assessment, the intelligence community has said”

This is misleading, since this is not an official assessment, and refers only to the opinions of some within US intelligence, and is at odds with the assessment of those members of the intelligence community that have challenged the accusation, just as they did Iraqi WMD, White House claims about Ukraine, Libya, and Syria, and have stated that if such evidence existed, we - and more importantly, they - would have seen it by now. 

Something an objective journalist would mention ... 

They and Assange have stated their belief that the hacks were most likely the work of insiders within the party, who were incensed by what had been done to undermine Sanders and manipulate US democracy. Of course, the media played a central role in these schemes, so don't expect it to tell the whole story..