I was trying to determine the source of our disagreements. My intentions here were to understand your perspective. It is unfortunate that you can't maintain a conversation without insults at this stage. Our conversation appeared to me as though you were arguing just to argue missing points, twisting facts and misrepresenting my statements. Maybe you were giving me a demo of a "Chewbacca defense".
.
"we cannot specify how many people were affected but that doesn't mean we should disregard any affects at all." My point was to never "disregard" the possibility. I didn't like their word usage, it implies calculable damage when I read it.
.
"I don't believe anything I wrote could even be reasonably inferred to indicate I believe it is less harmful when Americans do it" You did, Chewbacca! Now we are even.
.
I was hoping to get some understanding of your perspective. Due to the nature of your last couple replies, I think I'll take a pass. My apologies for wasting our time.