I used to think him as parodying Archie Bunker.

But then one day when he wanted to cite an actual statute that I have considerable experience with, and explained precisely how he was only selectively reading the statute (doh!), pointing directly to where the statute stated contrary to his claims, and he acknowledged the point but then, days later, was back to posting the same falsehoods on here.

It was then that I reclassified him from 'misguided' to 'propagandist'. Propagandists take facts and then attempt to proclaim that they're merely opinions (and then insist they merely have a different "opinion" about facts).

You'll also note that virtually all of the posts substitute actual knowledge of how the world works with a keen knowledge of what the likes of Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin or Sean Hannity say about events. It's like a physician hearing some "wellness blogger" talk about some quack treatment! As with much of "Fox" the more (mis)informed they are the less knowledgeable.