I agree that it is a bipartisan issue so why was only one side presented if there should be a discussion?  Is CB now a bully pulpit for the progressive point of view on everything?  Don't we have enough issues here in HI to investigate?  What is CB's tax exempt status? 

Are you acknowledging that you and CB are progressives and that we can count on all of the articles being from that particular partisan point of view?  I don't see how this article was bipartisan.  
 
Saying that Schatz is on the "wrong side," is your and CB's partisan opinion, is it not?  There are undoubtedly others who agree & disagree with you but when you state the headline as a fact it appears you are only interested in giving one side.  I guess I'm failing to see the "investigative" value of this article and only the political one.  

You mention a response from Schatz by email and then proceeded to argue and bring in a number of other people about the same national issue.  Way too complicated here.