Had to give you a sad, Smithers-S.  What's "sad" for me is the rationale for your insight into that "ugly and violent brawl."  I'll say it clearly: I agree with your characterization.  Also this one: "there is no "good" side and there is no "bad side."  Absolutely correct.  

Then, however, you negate your own position.  "The only people participating in a brawl..." is not accurate.  I think it actually flies in the face of your own "no good side/no bad side" statement. RE: your statement that the mainstream media has "used this even to attack...deliberately misinterpreting statements..."  Don't believe that's true, either.  

Sadly, you are no better at clearly supporting your position than is the President.  Yes: it is repugnant to me that he appears to support supremacists.  But no: he's not wrong to condemn the OTHER side.