Irrelevant. Your opinion about events is not being considered. Why not show me in the baker's brief where it says that is part of their defense?

Why do you want me to prove your very dubious contention for you?
That is not how it works. You prove that there is not discrimination. Go ahead and try to prove what thelawyers are not considering.

You are literally arguing for legal discrimination, no matter what kind of semantic argument you make.