I feel as if that is a completely different story occurring in very different context with a dissimilar outcome. Why do you want to conflate it? What's your point? Shall we talk about yelling "fire" in theaters next? I'm hardly advocating limitless speech, but it should be damned near that ideal, with no grey area for fishing trips from local or county authorities. It gets into thoughtcrime and judicial literal reinterpretation of fictional events and interactions, fast. And that leads to unending potential to render wrongful harm in individuals' lives, all farcically under the banner of "justice." That's aiming for a dystopian unlivable world where freedom of expression is but the echo of a myth of life back during some lost better age of civilization and mankind. The legacy of Nixon, Dick Cheney, and every other sock puppet monster like them will be defeat and shame and the revulsion of history. Yet, like zombies, they fail to desist when they cease to be viable. Solutions? Discuss.