Glad to have some guidance on this.

A poor consultation process (IMO) was one of the rationales as to why Northern Gateway was killed

In contrast, (IMO) Kinder Morgan will likely succeed in legal challenges as they did a much better job of engaging communities along the route.

A more interesting case was the PETRONAS LNG plant that was killed by PETRONAS.
They did a very good job of engaging communities along the route.   But there was the dichotomy between the hereditary chiefs and the elected band councils   The SCC should provide clarification as to what it deems consent if there are intra-band disagreements.  Contract law would support the elected band's approval but is there a different/higher standard?  Should there be?  What are the implications, if there are