Season 3 isn't all bad. The show did get me to feel invested in seeing Ciri find her true self. But it is taking a long time. The monsters need to get a better agent or join a union. They barely get one monster per episode. I suppose it's understandable because I never feel any doubt that Geralt or Ciri will take down the monster.

Season 3 attempts to step into the "Game" part of Game of Thrones and focus on politics. None of the characters seem clever enough to pull it off.

I can't take my eyes off of Yennefer, and that doesn't hurt. I am intrigued by the different Mages. I find Triss interesting, and I would like to see her more in the story. Geralt, Jaskier, and the Elf Warrior played by Robbie Amell are the only male characters that are interesting to me. All of the other men are forgettable to me, including the fire villain, the Brotherhood people, the various kings and princes, and others I can't even remember.

I read other reviews saying Geralt plays a secondary role in season 3. I agree. He does seem to be on the sidelines especially compared to season 1. I think the show got bogged down in the Ciri story. I would have had her find herself and control her power in season 2 so she could have more action sequences in season 3. Like Ciri, this show is having trouble finding itself. Is it an entertaining action show that doesn't require much thought? Or is it a character-based political drama interspersed with a great action sequence and amazing special effects like Game of Thrones? I would have suggested sticking to fun action with witty dialogue while adding more depth to the characters every season.