What is NOT working:

The story and cinematographic quality


Did anyone read the books Netflix people?!

Witcher's universe is rich and detailed with how the world works - several cities, people and their stories, interesting characters, Slavic mythology, monsters, but what more there is religion, economy, wars, politics and intrigue...

I can go to details, (Alchemy anyone, for just a small example?! Why are witchers using only one potion that makes their eyes 'cool demonic black' whilst there is a plethora of potions and alchemistic stuff to use?!), but I won't, as it would take a dissertation work to brake this down.

I understand that this is an adaptation and there are factors such as time, people management, budget etc., but that doesn't excuse the cringy dialogues, not using the world and it's richness at all, following the main heavily adjusted story line, trying to make the characters cool at all costs, poorly used story and other. It's just very Netflix- like and that's it - it lacks quality.



I like Henry as an actor (especially as a Superman) and I think he is really cool guy in general (nerd 💪), but Witcher doesn't look like Henry at all, ok? Henry is too buffed and hunky and the wig looks so fake sometimes. There needs to be



Oh my... That black armor Henry wears? The one with the silver points, that always looks like new and not battered by many fights with a 'cool design', and illogical format?

And the other costumes and clothes the actors wear? It's not all so bad, but it's like there is not a single historian/person qualified to oversee this.

I liked the music, some actors and their acting and some scenes, but this was pain to watch.