This can't have been a cheap film to produce but it's still an incoherent bloody mess. I guess all the blatant product placement must have covered a good chunk of the budget however just how do Netflix executives measure one of their efforts as successful? For a theatrical release this is a simple matter of revenue versus budget, if revenue is higher than budget the movie was a success and visa versa. For a straight to Netflix release the success or failure is more difficult to judge. The most obvious metric would be how many people watched the movie, but that is no reflection of quality. People will watch it because in their perception it is free, but if they had to pay to watch how many would do so? If a traditional movie studio produced expensive dros like 6Underground they would go out of business pretty quickly so they would ensure production quality to avoid bankruptcy. It's different for Netflix however. They can continue to produce garbage like this movie and people will watch it because it is free so there is no incentive to produce quality products.