Why be on the side of good, if "everything will burn anyway"? There are cheap entertainments - gunpowder and gasoline, but a process that cannot be stopped must be led, Lenin said. The collapse of the world - rampant crime. And somehow it's even stupid to fight evil, because it's still one step ahead, and wins. You can't take your eyes off him, all our bows and applause are to him. Evil is bright, convex, masterpiece. Where is good for him? Besides, if you are on the side of good, then you are also a target. Is it worth it?

And here is another position - a two-faced person. "The world is cruel, and only chance can be moral in it." And even if you have a coin with two eagles, one side is black, the other is white, as well as your whole life.

As one reviewer rightly pointed out, Eckhart's role is a key figure in understanding the film and the backbone of the plot. "I'm Batman, arrest me." Is it possible to believe that very soon this person will fall, unable to withstand grief and resentment? Or was it in him from the very beginning?

It's not bad to pretend to be a hero. If you are just human. What do you have to lose? Moreover, the hero will repay you in full, he will take on your sins, he will pretend to be an uncontrollable jerk and he will declare a hunt for himself.

We're after him because he'll survive. A well-formed Christian idea. Ilya Kabanov in his review (thanks and applause) says that the third part - the resurrection of the hero should follow the first two. Perhaps he is right. But even if the hero is resurrected, we know (from reliable sources) that evil will still win. The apocalypse is inevitable, everything will burn anyway. But at the same time, something still remains inside, which prompts (even with the obligatory American pathos) to throw the damned detonator out the window, and not to dirty your own conscience.

Here is such a movie.