I agree with many who wrote above: it is completely unclear who eventually parasitizes in the film. Absolutely all of his characters work, regardless of social class, and the fact that the main characters received jobs in a rich house somewhat fraudulently can be found almost at every step, there was nothing particularly shocking.

If the main rich man of the film were the personification of all the nasty things that the bourgeoisie can associate with, then it would be much more powerful. That is, if, for example, he beat his wife, mistreated children and a maid, went to the left, threw tantrums for no reason, then one could still understand the wave of indignation of the father of a poor family, indignation that reached its climax in the finale. But this is NOTHING. We see a peaceful family, a caring father and mother who love children and really do everything they can for them.

From here follows the conclusion from the opposite: if the main rich people of the film are decent people, a loving family, then I would like to see the embittered, humiliated and offended poor people, which would play on this contrast. But this is NOTHING. Both of them love each other, everyone loves children, there is plenty of respect between family members, there is simply NO contrast, an antagonist in the film.

In general, I do not understand why such films receive Palme d'Or. There is a much more poignant movie, underestimated by critics, not getting anything. There are many such films. And here for what, well, for what? For timing? For a beautiful picture or a good game of actors? This is now easy to do if you try a little. But the fact that the main thing in the film is very false - the PLOT, this cannot be corrected by anything.