I get a lot of people feel this is an artistic intellectual movie, but it definitely lacks in both categories. Movies are supposed to be entertaining. This might story is better as a documentary. This movie was definitely boring, personally i dislike movies that jump around non-stop and that is this movie for 3 hours, just non-stop cut from one scene to another like every 2 minutes. This polished turd must of taken forever to edit. The actors did great i just hate how it was put together.

The movie, spanning an exhaustive three hours, felt less like a cohesive narrative and more like a chaotic collage of scenes. The director's choice to jump from one scene to another every couple of minutes created a disjointed experience. This constant shifting not only made it challenging to follow the plot but also diluted the emotional impact of critical moments. The lack of continuity disrupted the flow, turning what could have been a compelling story into a tedious and confusing ordeal.

While the actors delivered commendable performances, their efforts were overshadowed by the film's structural flaws. The characters, though portrayed with depth and nuance, were lost in the whirlwind of rapid scene changes. It was as if the actors' potential to truly embody their roles and bring the historical figures to life was stifled by the overwhelming editing.

Moreover, the film's pacing was another point of contention. In an attempt to cover an extensive part of J. Robert Oppenheimer's life and the monumental task of developing the atomic bomb, the movie ironically lost its explosive impact. The pacing was uneven, with some segments dragging on, contributing to an overall feeling of boredom. The lack of a focused narrative arc made it challenging to remain engaged or emotionally invested in the story.

The visual and sound editing, while technically proficient, seemed to prioritize style over substance. The relentless cutting from one scene to another, though perhaps intended to create a sense of urgency or dynamism, instead resulted in a fragmented viewing experience. It felt as though the movie was trying too hard to be stylistically innovative at the cost of clear storytelling.