What Nolan represent is a cinema which is based on psychedelic experience. And he is best in that,be it memento,dark knight,doodlebug,inception and man of steel. The genre in which we are talking is an experience which don't form a straight story but the conditions a man experience through the journey.

I am a big fan of Christopher Nolan. He is breaking the parameter of cinema by infusing the elements which were never present before. Given the fact that Nietzsche theory and other writer/philosophers who were concluding the point long before but hate to conclude that i hate formulaic cinema which is being presented to all people same alike even if we talking scientific terms. In my opinion i want to see a cinema which is cult,and is provided to the community which are exposed to it. Interstellar film is a ironic situation for me, it is never the condition of the cinema which represent a theory about the Scientology of events in a wide manner.

It define a barometer to us. I will definitely compare it to the 2001 Space Odyssey by Stanley Kubrick which I am a great fan of too. IT didn't surpass it, given the facts that we are living in 2014 and that film was made in 1967. The analogy disturbs me as money became pivotal in the cinematic life of directors.

I find fault in the whole production houses philosophy of churning profits and indulging in the work of artist who got a different say to its theme. The Coen Brothers,Bergman,Lars Von Tier are avoiding them and some few who are not acceptable to this new age culture of cinema.

I want Nolan to explore his own genre with Jonathan and came up with his own production of SYNCOPY where the mutual consideration will be about getting the cinematic experience into the common cause.