What is wrong with all those critics and people from the industry, showering this movie with accolades?

This "epic" motion picture constantly maneuvers between being borig-ish and plain boring, with the culmination part shifting to a plain boredom. At that point of the storytelling this is literally a telling of a story- watching the "movie" "scene" about the fish in the car it is like watching real life police officers reading out loud transcripts of tapes from wires during a court hearing. Throughout the overall 210 minutes only the epilogue is of real value- but that last part only lasts (depending on how you count it) around 20 of the ending minutes. And it is only then when this gang of old actors are playing believably people of different age- someone older than themselves that is. Because throughout the entire movie the viewer is feed with the supposition of the-CGI-makes-them-look-young-and-they-act-youthfully - but that is a total BS. The rages of Al Pacino are unintended parody of his earlier roles (and are even done intentionally in a matter of ageism humor), while the entire rest of cast is simply non convincing enough

In a matter of fact that epilogue is good enough that much, that it could be a stand alone short movie- and only because of that fragment this review is stamped with a 3/10 rating and not with a 2/10