I thought newcomer actress Sarah Snook was good in this film-this bizarre film-that has the female lead played by Sarah Snook-having a relationship with herself across time and gender lines and then also creating a bay in the same situation which ends up being identified by the film as the female lead herself taken back in time by Ethan Hawkes character. That is a paradox within a paradox giving birth to itself. All in all I do find that a creepy idea. Even if it is well dated. Ethan hawk played a major role in this film although he is identified as playing 'the bartender.' That would be technically correct but the film hinges on his part in it. I think it is good to be creative especially i science fiction but at the same time I think they should watch what they put into films like this. I think the film suggests that lengthy hospital stays in young persons are maybe because of latent Hermaphroditism and the resultant 'correctly diagnosed sex change.' I think that is a psychiatric absurdism that hinges on what is considered to be "normal" behavior that omits what a person feels about themselves. So the film is sort of also a soft cell for psychiatric BS also. I don't know if it intends to be but it is. It is sort of like saying that what a person feels is not as important as what a persons biology is, which is contra freewill-what has come to represent the whole GLBT thing. The film is a screen adaptation of a classic Robert Heinlein SF story. I only gave it a six because I thought it was something done in order to get praise, as opposed to something done out of a desire to make legitimate "art."