I respectfully disagree; did this movie lack intensity? Watching war films without feeling the visceral horror and tension of battle is truly underwhelming. "Saving Private Ryan" immerses you in World War 2 with bullets whizzing by, explosions ripping through, and bodies trembling, evoking spine-chilling shivers. However, "Dunkirk" appears orderly and sanitized, lacking that crucial sense of raw tension.

I struggled to connect with any of the characters, as they seemed devoid of heroism and depth, leaving me with the impression of mere character actors.

The cinematography stood out as a strong point.