Another film (as in at least 80% of cases) that should have been refrained from doing so much is ridiculous. It still shows that it's not really actors, directors, etc. which are important but the scenario, the story (which accounts for 80% of the films).

Film supposedly "historical" but as in the majority of this type of film we learn nothing at all.

We wanted to pay homage in this film: "This film is dedicated to all of which lives have been impacted by the events at Dunkirk."

What a tribute to have created such a cr***y film! We can still say that in this film everything is at the same level (ridiculous): scenarios, acting, music, etc. It only has the technicality that is doing well but it is not even a quality because thanks to electronics technology is now easily acquired.

This film is not a historical film but is supposed to be a film "Tribute". Objective completely missed!

When the score of 7.9 / 10, it shows that all data that is in a computer can be tampered with and give the numbers that you want to have. But the important thing is that humans believe in these scores.

We should show the score after we have given a note. Since most people are sheep, they are easily influenced. The scores are nothing and this film is the proof.

Besides the scores, prices, etc. are never objective. They are given by humans. If this film had been analyzed objectively it would have been 7.9 but at most 3/10.

It is enough to give a name known and bang it is extraordinary even if in fact it is cr***y.

If you want to fall asleep this movie is for you. Otherwise it is better to buy a good book on the subject. Ideally asked a historian and not a store for whom money is the only goal and not history.