I must express my disappointment with the writing of Glass Onion, which I found to be among the weakest aspects of the movie. Unfortunately, it didn't manage to capture my attention and left me feeling frustrated and unsatisfied as a viewer.

A particular choice by the director that stood out to me was the decision to present the story in a non-chronological order. I found this approach to be rather lazy, as it seemed to undermine the connection between the audience and the protagonist. This creative choice hindered my ability to fully appreciate the characters' motivations, making it difficult to unravel their complexities. Moreover, I felt that this narrative technique negatively impacted the performance of the lead detective, a key figure in the storyline.

Regrettably, the movie also suffered from what I perceived as lazy choices in its storytelling. The reliance on exposition and the use of journals as a plot device were notable examples. These decisions took away from the overall quality of the film, preventing me from fully immersing myself in the experience.

It's evident that some viewers have been critical of the director's abilities, describing their style as irksome. I share the sentiment that these choices made by the director have introduced significant issues into the film, ultimately affecting my enjoyment of it.

The film, in my view, is characterized as being clever on the surface but lacking in substance. The director seemed to manipulate the audience's expectations, creating an uneven and disorienting viewing experience. This lack of depth and the director's manipulation of the audience's emotions certainly contributed to the overall negative reception of the movie.

One aspect that I found particularly disappointing was the film's focus on individual standout performances rather than developing a cohesive narrative. This contrasted sharply with its predecessor, Knives Out, which managed to strike a better balance between character development and storytelling. This lack of cohesion could be seen as a shortcoming in the director's approach.

However, it's important to acknowledge that the movie wasn't entirely without merit. Notably, strong performances from actors such as Janelle Monáe, Kate Hudson, and Daniel Craig added a layer of appeal. Despite these positive elements, the movie fell short of my expectations due to the director's creative choices.

In conclusion, my review of Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery revolves around the director's weaknesses in both writing and directing decisions. These shortcomings contributed significantly to the film's lackluster reception in my eyes. While there were commendable performances, the characters felt underdeveloped and the ensemble cast had less to contribute compared to its predecessor. Overall, the director's flaws ultimately overshadowed the potential of the movie.