Here is the original review I wrote: When you hire hack writers who try to 'adapt' rather than 'create', you get moldy toast. All the production Money in the world can't overcome a weak script. Seriously - horses hooves ... trivial and rambling dialogue that seems rushed to get through like it is some chore. Almost ZERO character development, like everyone should already know who is who and what their roles are. Glib and annoying supporting actors like, they are going to die soon so who cares. A total travesty, keep the main actor and start over - who approved this mess, the producer's 12 year old son? - Sorry ... this show is bad on so many levels.

Then I started reading other submissions; When I singled out the 10 star ones a pattern appeared, they were largely fake. I have always been able to spot idiom and language use similarities. My early days as a professional researcher taught me to look for "best evidence", or "original content" as some biographers call it. Often times falsehoods are repeated so many times that people start to believe them real. When you list all the minor variations in wording you realize there was no true "first source", but rather something akin to the telephone game, just repeated and expanded upon falsehoods. So I have analyzed these excessively high ratings and discovered a less than 25% original, varied word selection. They could have been written by a robot. I am now searching for a reliable program that will spot all these repetitious language usages to expose the troll and bot accounts polluting the internet.