It has its many obvious strong points, but I can't go above an 8/10 for several reasons:

1. most of it - with the exception of the last episode - is oddly devoid of emotional content and leaves various event sequences without on-screen closure

2. the focal "achievement" is a grossly overrated board game that correlates neither with general intelligence nor with any other type of socially relevant skill that might make good players worthy of the kind of respect that is traditionally awarded high-performing chess players

3. it's the same old Netflix style liberal-progressive message that all we need for equality between the genders is for a few exceptional women here and there to become "successful" in some previously male-dominated highly individualistic, highly competitive and hierarchical field, never mind how hollow or meaningless that field was to begin with or how dehumanizing and repetitive (or antisocial or violent, in the case of CEOs or military achievement) the work required to get there. This is a pathetic shadow of what feminism should be from a genuine Leftist perspective (but comes as no surprise when the source are Liberals, who are right-wing).

There are good messages thrown in there, it's certainly satisfying to see a woman beat so many men at a competitive activity, but it also leaves a lot to be desired. ("For All Mankind", for example, is a much better recent feminist TV show set in the same era.)