At least not everyone thinks that everything Nolan does is sunshine from his posterior.

Is it worthy? Possibly.

Realistic? Who know but I'm erring on the side of very much not - see other reviews for details.

Interesting? No.

Exciting? No.

Entertaining? ZZZzzz...

And Hans Zimmer - jesus, whose idea was that for a soundtrack? It's not a soundtrack it's just noise, not even a soundscape. Sit through that for one-and-three-quarter hours will you!

One can only suppose that the awards and high scores are because of the subject matter. They absolutely cannot possibly be for the movie.

If you want to know what really happened, watch some documentaries and read some books. This is a poor, poor excuse for a movie on just about very level.

It's interesting to read some of the OTT reviews which seem intent on justifying the high score. Of course you can score a movie highly on many aspects from direction to story to acting.

So, along with many, many others, I thought it was rubbish but you'll probably watch it yourself, even when it comes on TV - as you should - and make up your own mind, as you should, too.