**a contrat rendered in solar punk aesthetic with lush vegetation that incorporates these insights: Short of it is an argument that the contract is the space in which almost all societal relations are now mitigated - vs historic (though not historic for many indigenous groups) modes of mitigation through collective gathering and experimental ritual. The contract now is used to make sure the wealth distribution of today is the same (or further favoring those in power) tomorrow. In architecture, the contract is a significant mitigating factor between client and architect, whereby the presumed outcome is a building. If we think about colomina's stance in that the construction site of architecture is media, it is clear that the contract is overlooked - as a true construction site of architecture, where many (but critically not all) the relationships of the process of building are imagined and controlled. I have been running workshops with Simon exploring the contract as site of potential disruption and ritual experimentation - if the contract is used to define and control relationships - can it also be used to redefine and reimagine those relationships? I think in the context of organizing the contract has huge possibility - eg, "land" is just a series of decisions ratified through contracts and state controlled decision making. I am aware that Civic Square in the UK are doing work on experimenting with how land contracts can be redesigned. realistic. magic hour. --s 250** - Image #4 <@809402610993725514>
a contrat rendered in solar punk aesthetic with lush vegetation that incorporates these insights Short of it is an argument that the contract is the space in which almost all societal relations are now mitigated  vs historic though not historic for many indigenous groups modes of mitigation through collective gathering and experimental ritual. The contract now is used to make sure the wealth distribution of today is the same or further favoring those in power tomorrow. In architecture, the contract is a significant mitigating factor between client and architect, whereby the presumed outcome is a building. If we think about colominas stance in that the construction site of architecture is media, it is clear that the contract is overlooked  as a true construction site of architecture, where many but critically not all the relationships of the process of building are imagined and controlled. I have been running workshops with Simon exploring the contract as site of potential disruption and ritual experimentation  if the contract is used to define and control relationships  can it also be used to redefine and reimagine those relationships? I think in the context of organizing the contract has huge possibility  eg, land is just a series of decisions ratified through contracts and state controlled decision making. I am aware that Civic Square in the UK are doing work on experimenting with how land contracts can be redesigned. realistic. magic hour.