in 2006 what was the ratio of the long-term debt payments due dealer remarketable securities to the medium-term notes
Important information:
table_1: 2006 the $ 492 of 2007 is $ 622 ; the $ 492 of 2008 is $ 85 ; the $ 492 of 2009 is $ 44 ; the $ 492 of 2010 is $ 0 ; the $ 492 of thereafter is $ 558 ; the $ 492 of total is $ 1801 ;
text_1: long-term debt payments due in 2006 include $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( final maturity 2010 ) and $ 62 million of medium-term notes ( final maturity 2044 ) .
text_15: at december 31 , 2004 , $ 62 million of medium-term notes had been issued under the medium-term notes program .
Key Information: maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to december 31 , 2005 are as follows ( in millions ) : .
Reasoning Steps:
Step: divide1-1(350, 62) = 5.65
Program:
divide(350, 62)
Program (Nested):
divide(350, 62)

Please answer the following financial question based on the context provided. Make sure to give the answer in raw number, not in percentage and without any units. If the question asks for percentage the value should be less than 1
Context:
maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to december 31 , 2005 are as follows ( in millions ) : .
Table
2006  | 2007  | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | thereafter | total 
$ 492 | $ 622 | $ 85 | $ 44 | $ 0  | $ 558      | $ 1801
long-term debt payments due in 2006 include $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( final maturity 2010 ) and $ 62 million of medium-term notes ( final maturity 2044 ) . these securities are classified as current portion of long-term debt as the result of put provisions associated with these debt instruments . the next date on which investors can require the company to repurchase the convertible notes is 2007 , thus in the above schedule these securities are considered due in 2007 ( final maturity 2032 ) . the esop debt is serviced by dividends on stock held by the esop and by company contributions . these contributions are not reported as interest expense , but are reported as an employee benefit expense in the consolidated statement of income . other borrowings includes debt held by 3m 2019s international companies and floating rate notes in the united states , with the long-term portion of this debt primarily comprised of u.s . dollar floating rate debt . at december 31 , 2005 , available short-term committed lines of credit globally totaled about $ 618 million , of which $ 101 million was utilized . debt covenants do not restrict the payment of dividends . 3m has a medium-term notes program and shelf registration that have remaining capacity of approximately $ 1.438 billion at december 31 , 2005 . in september 2003 , the company filed a shelf registration statement with the securities and exchange commission relating to the potential offering of debt securities of up to $ 1.5 billion . this shelf registration became effective in october 2003 . in december 2003 , the company established under the shelf a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 1.5 billion of medium-term notes may be offered . 3m plans to use the net proceeds from issuances of debt securities under this registration for general corporate purposes , including the repayment of debt ; investments in or extensions of credit to 3m subsidiaries ; or the financing of possible acquisitions or business expansion . at december 31 , 2004 , $ 62 million of medium-term notes had been issued under the medium-term notes program . no debt was issued under this program in 2005 . 3m may redeem its 30-year zero-coupon senior notes ( the 201cconvertible notes 201d ) at any time in whole or in part , beginning november 21 , 2007 , at the accreted conversion price ; however , bondholders may convert upon notification of redemption into 9.4602 shares of 3m common stock . holders of the 30-year zero-coupon senior notes have the option to require 3m to purchase their notes at accreted value on november 21 in the years 2005 , 2007 , 2012 , 2017 , 2022 and 2027 . in november 2005 , 22506 of the 639000 in outstanding bonds were redeemed , resulting in a payout from 3m of approximately $ 20 million . this reduced the convertible notes 2019 face value at maturity to $ 616 million , which equates to a book value of approximately $ 539 million at december 31 , 2005 . as disclosed in a form 8-k in november 2005 , 3m amended the terms of these securities to pay cash at a rate of 2.40% ( 2.40 % ) per annum of the principal amount at maturity of the company 2019s convertible notes , which equates to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) per annum of the notes 2019 accreted value on november 21 , 2005 . the cash interest payments will be made semiannually in arrears on may 22 , 2006 , november 22 , 2006 , may 22 , 2007 and november 22 , 2007 to holders of record on the 15th calendar day preceding each such interest payment date . 3m originally sold $ 639 million in aggregate face amount of these 201cconvertible notes 201d on november 15 , 2002 , which are convertible into shares of 3m common stock . the gross proceeds from the offering , to be used for general corporate purposes , were $ 550 million ( $ 540 million net of issuance costs ) . debt issuance costs were amortized on a straight-line basis over a three-year period beginning in november 2002 . on february 14 , 2003 , 3m registered these convertible notes in a registration statement filed with the securities and exchange commission . the terms of the convertible notes include a yield to maturity of .50% ( .50 % ) and an initial conversion premium of 40% ( 40 % ) over the $ 65.00 ( split-adjusted ) closing price of 3m common stock on november 14 , 2002 . if certain conditions for conversion ( relating to the closing common stock prices of 3m exceeding the conversion trigger price for specified periods ) are met , holders may convert each of the 30-year zero-coupon senior notes into 9.4602 shares of 3m common stock in any calendar quarter commencing after march 31 , 2003 . the conversion trigger price for the fourth quarter of 2005 was $ 120.00 per share . if the conditions for conversion are met , and 3m elects not to settle in cash , the 30-year zero-coupon senior notes will be convertible in the aggregate into approximately 5.8 million shares of 3m common stock . 3m may choose to pay the redemption purchase price in cash and/or common stock ; however , if redemption occurs , the company has the intent and ability to settle this debt security in cash . the conditions for conversion have never been met ; accordingly , there has been no impact on 3m 2019s diluted earnings per share . for a discussion of accounting pronouncements that will affect accounting treatment for the convertible note , refer to note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of eitf issue no . 04-08 , 201cthe effect of contingently convertible debt on diluted earnings per share 201d and proposed sfas no . 128r , 201cearnings per share 201d. .
Question: 
in 2006 what was the ratio of the long-term debt payments due dealer remarketable securities to the medium-term notes
Important information:
table_1: 2006 the $ 492 of 2007 is $ 622 ; the $ 492 of 2008 is $ 85 ; the $ 492 of 2009 is $ 44 ; the $ 492 of 2010 is $ 0 ; the $ 492 of thereafter is $ 558 ; the $ 492 of total is $ 1801 ;
text_1: long-term debt payments due in 2006 include $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( final maturity 2010 ) and $ 62 million of medium-term notes ( final maturity 2044 ) .
text_15: at december 31 , 2004 , $ 62 million of medium-term notes had been issued under the medium-term notes program .
Key Information: maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to december 31 , 2005 are as follows ( in millions ) : .
Reasoning Steps:
Step: divide1-1(350, 62) = 5.65
Program:
divide(350, 62)
Program (Nested):
divide(350, 62)
