in 2009 what was the percent of the total second generation capital expenditures associated with leasing costs
Important information:
table_1: the second generation tenant improvements of 2010 is $ 36676 ; the second generation tenant improvements of 2009 is $ 29321 ; the second generation tenant improvements of 2008 is $ 36885 ;
table_2: the second generation leasing costs of 2010 is 39090 ; the second generation leasing costs of 2009 is 40412 ; the second generation leasing costs of 2008 is 28205 ;
table_4: the totals of 2010 is $ 88723 ; the totals of 2009 is $ 79054 ; the totals of 2008 is $ 74814 ;
Reasoning Steps:
Step: divide1-1(40412, 79054) = 51.1%
Program:
divide(40412, 79054)
Program (Nested):
divide(40412, 79054)

Please answer the following financial question based on the context provided. Make sure to give the answer in raw number, not in percentage and without any units. If the question asks for percentage the value should be less than 1
Context:
34| | duke realty corporation annual report 2010 value of $ 173.9 million for which our 80% ( 80 % ) share of net proceeds totaled $ 138.3 million . we expect , and are under contract , to sell additional buildings to duke/ princeton , llc by the end of the second quarter 2011 , subject to financing and other customary closing conditions . the total 2011 sale is expected to consist of 13 office buildings , totaling over 2.0 million square feet , with an agreed upon value of $ 342.8 million , and is expected to generate proceeds of $ 274.2 million for the 80% ( 80 % ) portion that we sell . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 accretive property investment ; 2022 leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 repurchases of outstanding debt and preferred stock ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and is focused on accretive growth . we have continued to operate at a substantially reduced level of new development activity , as compared to recent years , and are focused on the core operations of our existing base of properties . leasing/capital costs tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that had been previously under lease to tenants are referred to as second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties are also second generation expenditures . one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our second generation capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively ( in thousands ) : .
Table
                                      | 2010    | 2009    | 2008   
second generation tenant improvements | $ 36676 | $ 29321 | $ 36885
second generation leasing costs       | 39090   | 40412   | 28205  
building improvements                 | 12957   | 9321    | 9724   
totals                                | $ 88723 | $ 79054 | $ 74814
.
Question: 
in 2009 what was the percent of the total second generation capital expenditures associated with leasing costs
Important information:
table_1: the second generation tenant improvements of 2010 is $ 36676 ; the second generation tenant improvements of 2009 is $ 29321 ; the second generation tenant improvements of 2008 is $ 36885 ;
table_2: the second generation leasing costs of 2010 is 39090 ; the second generation leasing costs of 2009 is 40412 ; the second generation leasing costs of 2008 is 28205 ;
table_4: the totals of 2010 is $ 88723 ; the totals of 2009 is $ 79054 ; the totals of 2008 is $ 74814 ;
Reasoning Steps:
Step: divide1-1(40412, 79054) = 51.1%
Program:
divide(40412, 79054)
Program (Nested):
divide(40412, 79054)
