text: You are Here: Home >< Maths
  
  # Official TSR Mathematical Society Watch
  
  1. Yes but you can't say that 33 (mod 10) = 3*11 (mod 10) and therefore 33 mod 10 is divisible by 3 and 11 (but not 9 so it can't be a square, which is what the proof says).
  2. (Original post by SsEe)
  Yes but you can't say that 33 (mod 10) = 3*11 (mod 10) and therefore 33 mod 10 is divisible by 3 and 11 (but not 9 so it can't be a square, which is what the proof says).
  No, 33 (mod 10) is not necessarily divisible by 3 or 11.
  43 = 33 (mod 10)...
  3. Oh! Yeah, what you're saying makes perfect sense. The mix-up was on my part. Here's another way to look at the question:
  
  For n>4, S always ends in 3 and hence isn't a perfect square.
  
  Proving that if a number ends in 3 it isn't a perfect square basically uses SsEe's method.
  4. (Original post by dvs)
  I don't get what you're saying. The proof isn't really dividing per se, it's considering the prime decomposition of 33 (mod 10).
  just to add, some care is needed when saying prime in mod arithmetic.
  for example 3=3.1 and 3=9.7 mod 10.
  5. Even better and slicker, mod 5.
  6. Can 801,345,230,914 be written as the sum of 3 cubes?
  7. Is that a guess or do you have some reasoning to go with that?
  8. I have some reasoning. (That I don't want to show in case I'm talking BS again. )
  9. Well let's see the reasoning then.
  10. Let's consider perfect cubes modulo 7:
  a³ = b (mod 7)
  0³=0, 1³=1, 2³=1, 3³=-1, 4³=1, 5³=-1, 6³=-1 and 7³=0 (all mod 7)
  
  So perfect cubes leave remainders 0, 1 or -1 when divided by 7. In other words, perfect cubes are of the form:
  7k+1, 7k-1 or 7k.
  
  Now consider the sum of 3 cubes of the form 7k-1, it'd be of the form 7p-3=7n+4. So numbers of the form 7n+4 can be written as the sum of 3 perfect cubes. Let's check this for n={1,2,3}:
  7*1+4 = 11 = 3³ + (-2)³ + (-2)³
  7*2+4 = 18 = 3³ + (-2)³ + (-1)³
  7*3+4 = 25 = 3³ + (-1)³ + (-1)³
  
  Finally, let's consider 801,345,230,914 modulo 7:
  801,345,230,914 = 4 (mod 7), which means it's of the form 7k+4 and can be written as the sum of 3 cubes.
  11. Nice. Sadly you've only proved that a solution exists modulo 7.
  
  I have another question.
  a² + b² = 6ab. Find the value of (a+b)/(a-b).
  This is from an SMC so shouldn't be too hard.
  12. a² + b² = (a+b)² - 2ab = (a-b)² + 2ab = 6ab
  
  So (a+b)/(a-b) = sqrt((a+b)²/(a-b)²) = sqrt(8ab/4ab) = sqrt(2)
  13. Well done . I knew the efforts of the TSR mathmos wouldn't fail to solve that really hard question hehe
  14. (Original post by SsEe)
  Nice. Sadly you've only proved that a solution exists modulo 7.
  But isn't that sufficient? I mean, I showed that numbers of the form 7k+4 can be written as the sum of 3 perfect cubes, and then showed that the number in the question is of the form 7k+4.
  
  How'd you do it?
  15. You showed that numbers of the form 7k+4 can be written as 3 cubes modulo 7. In fact it can't be written as 3 cubes:
  Consider modulo 9:
  cubes modulo 9 can only be 0, 1 or 8.
  If a solution exists:
  a³ + b³ + c³ = 801,345,230,914
  +-(0, 1 or 8) +- (0, 1 or 8) +- (0, 1 or 8) = 4 (mod 9)
  (+- because 1=-8 and 8=-1)
  No combination of these make 4 mod 9 so no solution can exist.
  If it was congruent to any of these there would be a solution mod 9 (but not necessarily mod 1) : 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 (I think that's all).
  
  Somebody should check this as I'm having some doubts.
  16. (Original post by SsEe)
  You showed that numbers of the form 7k+4 can be written as 3 cubes modulo 7. In fact it can't be written as 3 cubes:
  Consider modulo 9:
  cubes modulo 9 can only be 0, 1 or 8.
  If a solution exists:
  a³ + b³ + c³ = 801,345,230,914
  +-(0, 1 or 8) +- (0, 1 or 8) +- (0, 1 or 8) = 4 (mod 9)
  (+- because 1=-8 and 8=-1)
  No combination of these make 4 mod 9 so no solution can exist.
  If it was congruent to any of these there would be a solution mod 9 (but not necessarily mod 1) : 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 (I think that's all).
  
  Somebody should check this as I'm having some doubts.
  Sorry, I cant see how you need to get 4 (mod 9) .
  801 = 0 (mod 9), 345 = 3 (mod 9), so you cant say anything about these two... However,
  230 and 914 = 5 (mod 9), but since cubes modulo 9 are -1,0,1, no sum of 3 can make 5, so these 2 cannot be written as the sum of 3 cubes.
  17. (Original post by dvs)
  But isn't that sufficient? I mean, I showed that numbers of the form 7k+4 can be written as the sum of 3 perfect cubes, and then showed that the number in the question is of the form 7k+4.
  
  How'd you do it?
  No, it is not a sufficient condition. You have not proved that *every* single number which can be written in the form 7k+4 can be written as the sum of 3 cubes, only that the sum of 3 cubes will always be a number of the form 7k+4.
  18. (Original post by JamesF)
  No, it is not a sufficient condition. You have not proved that *every* single number which can be written in the form 7k+4 can be written as the sum of 3 cubes, only that the sum of 3 cubes will always be a number of the form 7k+4.
  I don't think he's proven that, because it isn't true. e.g. 0^3 + 0^3 + 0^3.
  
  Rather he has shown that mod 7 considerations don't provide reasons why a number of the form 7k+4 couldn't be written as the sum of three cubes.
  19. (Original post by RichE)
  I don't think he's proven that, because it isn't true. e.g. 0^3 + 0^3 + 0^3.
  
  Rather he has shown that mod 7 considerations don't provide reasons why a number of the form 7k+4 couldn't be written as the sum of three cubes.
  Oops yea, I didnt read the actual post lol
  20. 345 = 7^3 + 1^3 + 1^3.
  
  9^3 < 801 < 10^3, so a,b,c < 10
  One of the cubes must be larger than 801/3 = 267, therefore
  10 > a > 6
  Then try a = 7,8,9
  801 - 9^3 = 72,
  801 - 8^3 = 289
  801 - 7^3 = 458
  Then its the same but showing each of those can or cannot be written as the sum of 2 cubes.
  Starting with 72, 5 > b > 3, so b = 4, c = 2
  So we have a solution
  801 = 9^3 + 4^3 + 2^3
  
  TSR Support Team
  
  We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
  
  This forum is supported by:
  Updated: August 3, 2015
  Today on TSR
  
  ### 'Entry requirements are a form of elitism'
  
  What do you think?
  
  ### Roommate kissed my boyfriend
  
  Discussions on TSR
  
  • Latest
  • ## See more of what you like on The Student Room
  
  You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.
  
  • Poll
  Useful resources
  
  ### Maths Forum posting guidelines
  
  Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here
  
  ### How to use LaTex
  
  Writing equations the easy way
  
  ### Study habits of A* students
  
  Top tips from students who have already aced their exams
  
  ## Groups associated with this forum:
  
  View associated groups
  Discussions on TSR
  
  • Latest
  • ## See more of what you like on The Student Room
  
  You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.
  
  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.
  
  Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE