text: 2,309 views
  
  Let $A$ be a set of $n(>0)$ elements. Let $N_r$ be the number of binary relations on $A$ and let $N_f$ be the number of functions from $A$ to $A$
  
  1. Give the expression for $N_r,$ in terms of $n.$
  2. Give the expression for $N_f,$ terms of $n.$
  3. Which is larger for all possible $n,N_r$ or $N_f$
  
  ### 1 comment
  
  A relation on a set S={1,2,3} → {(1,2),(1,3)} this is a relation but not a function.
  
  Every function is a relation but converse is false.
  
  ### Subscribe to GO Classes for GATE CSE 2022
  
  A. Consider a $2D$ matrix of $n\times n$ size where each dimension represent the $n$ elements of $A.$ So, we get $n^2$ elements where each one can be viewed as an ordered pair $(i,j), 1\leq i,j \leq n.$ Now if we consider a set with these $n^2$ elements, any subset of it will be a binary relation from $A$ to $A$.
  
  So, no. of binary relations, $N_r = 2^{n^2}$
  
  For a function from a set of $n$ elements to a set of $m$ elements we have $m$ choice for each of the $n$ elements of the domain. Thus, we get $m^n$ possibilities. Here, $m = n.$ So,
  
  No. of functions, $N_f = n^n$
  
  Now, number of functions must be smaller than the number of relations because every function is also a relation. We can prove this formally as follows:
  
  $\displaystyle \lim_{n\to \infty} \dfrac{2^{n^2}}{n^n}$
  
  $\dfrac{\infty}{\infty} \text{ form}.$ So, applying L'Hopital's rule (Limit remains same after taking derivative of both numerator and denominator)
  
  $= \displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{2n.\log 2. 2^{n^2}}{nn^{n-1}}$
  
  We can continue like this applying L'Hopital's rule and we should eventually get $1$ in the denominator (as after each derivation power of $n$ decreases by $1$) which gives the limit value as $\infty.$ So, $2^{n^2}$ is faster growing than $n^n.$
  
  So, for sufficiently large $n,$ $N_r > N_f$
  
  edited
  Here, no need to do further calculation which one is greater. A function is a subset of relation.
  
  Every function is a relation but every relation is not a function.So, clearly relation size is greater than that of number of function.
  
  (as after each derivation power of n decreases by 1)
  
  Where is this happening?
  
  @Divy Kala-No need to do derivation to tell you which one is greater.
  
  Yup.. functions are a subset of relations. But I think the explanation given in the answer is wrong, the denominator does not decrease at all.
  
  @Ayush Upadhyaya functions is a subset of relations because one to many type of relations are excluded from being functions right?
  
  $(2^{x^{2}})/(x^{x})$ has limit infinity.
  
  but the derivation is wrong.
  
  derivative  of $x^{x}$  is $x^{x} (1+\log x)$.
  
  so while in numerator with each derivative we are getting “x” in denominator, with each derivative, we are getting(1+logn) extra.  so limit is infinity
  
  A.  Number of binary relations on set A = Nr = 2^(n^2)
  
  B.  Number of functions on set A = Nf = n^n
  
  C.  No of relation > No of function( Nr >Nf) ,because function is restricted version of relation so it is obvious.By the way, we can check by taking log at both sides.
  
  by
  
  edited
  
  Set > Cartesian product > relation > function
  
  How cartesian product is a subset of set????
  
  The cartesian product consists of sets as it the cross product of a set with a set resulting in a set consisting of many sets. That's is why it comes under the sets.
  
  $1.N_{r}=2^{n^2}$
  
  $2.N_{f}=n^n$
  
  $3. N_{r}>N_{f}$
  
  $f:R\rightarrow R,$ $f(x)=\sqrt{x}$
  
  Is this a function ? NO !
  
  $f(4)=\sqrt {4}=\pm 2$
  
  But it is certainly a relation.
  
  $\therefore$ Every function is a relation, but not every relation is a function.
  
  $N_r = 2^{n^{2}}$ as total elements in the Cartesian product is $n \times n$ out of which each entry may or may not be included in the relation.
  
  $N_f = n^{n}$ Each element can map to any of the n elements.
  
  Take log of both the $N_f = n^{n}$ and $N_r = 2^{n^{2}}$
  
  we get $n* log n$ and $n^2 log2$ we know that $n^2 log2$ > $n* log n$ so $N_r$ > $N_f$
explanation: The provided text is a detailed explanation and solution to a math problem involving the number of binary relations and functions on a set. It contains a question with multiple parts and a corresponding answer for each part. The question asks for expressions for the number of binary relations and functions on a set, and which is larger. The answer provides the expressions and a proof that the number of binary relations is larger than the number of functions for sufficiently large \( n \).
distilabel_metadata.content: Evaluate the user given text extract and determine if it contains a math question and optionally and answer to this question.
  
  Output rules:
  
  1. Briefly describe the document and mention if it contains a question or a question and answer.
  2. Finalize the output with: Label: no-question,question,question-and-answer,multiple-question,multiple-question-and-answer
distilabel_metadata.role: system
distilabel_metadata.content: 2,309 views
  
  Let $A$ be a set of $n(>0)$ elements. Let $N_r$ be the number of binary relations on $A$ and let $N_f$ be the number of functions from $A$ to $A$
  
  1. Give the expression for $N_r,$ in terms of $n.$
  2. Give the expression for $N_f,$ terms of $n.$
  3. Which is larger for all possible $n,N_r$ or $N_f$
  
  ### 1 comment
  
  A relation on a set S={1,2,3} → {(1,2),(1,3)} this is a relation but not a function.
  
  Every function is a relation but converse is false.
  
  ### Subscribe to GO Classes for GATE CSE 2022
  
  A. Consider a $2D$ matrix of $n\times n$ size where each dimension represent the $n$ elements of $A.$ So, we get $n^2$ elements where each one can be viewed as an ordered pair $(i,j), 1\leq i,j \leq n.$ Now if we consider a set with these $n^2$ elements, any subset of it will be a binary relation from $A$ to $A$.
  
  So, no. of binary relations, $N_r = 2^{n^2}$
  
  For a function from a set of $n$ elements to a set of $m$ elements we have $m$ choice for each of the $n$ elements of the domain. Thus, we get $m^n$ possibilities. Here, $m = n.$ So,
  
  No. of functions, $N_f = n^n$
  
  Now, number of functions must be smaller than the number of relations because every function is also a relation. We can prove this formally as follows:
  
  $\displaystyle \lim_{n\to \infty} \dfrac{2^{n^2}}{n^n}$
  
  $\dfrac{\infty}{\infty} \text{ form}.$ So, applying L'Hopital's rule (Limit remains same after taking derivative of both numerator and denominator)
  
  $= \displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{2n.\log 2. 2^{n^2}}{nn^{n-1}}$
  
  We can continue like this applying L'Hopital's rule and we should eventually get $1$ in the denominator (as after each derivation power of $n$ decreases by $1$) which gives the limit value as $\infty.$ So, $2^{n^2}$ is faster growing than $n^n.$
  
  So, for sufficiently large $n,$ $N_r > N_f$
  
  edited
  Here, no need to do further calculation which one is greater. A function is a subset of relation.
  
  Every function is a relation but every relation is not a function.So, clearly relation size is greater than that of number of function.
  
  (as after each derivation power of n decreases by 1)
  
  Where is this happening?
  
  @Divy Kala-No need to do derivation to tell you which one is greater.
  
  Yup.. functions are a subset of relations. But I think the explanation given in the answer is wrong, the denominator does not decrease at all.
  
  @Ayush Upadhyaya functions is a subset of relations because one to many type of relations are excluded from being functions right?
  
  $(2^{x^{2}})/(x^{x})$ has limit infinity.
  
  but the derivation is wrong.
  
  derivative  of $x^{x}$  is $x^{x} (1+\log x)$.
  
  so while in numerator with each derivative we are getting “x” in denominator, with each derivative, we are getting(1+logn) extra.  so limit is infinity
  
  A.  Number of binary relations on set A = Nr = 2^(n^2)
  
  B.  Number of functions on set A = Nf = n^n
  
  C.  No of relation > No of function( Nr >Nf) ,because function is restricted version of relation so it is obvious.By the way, we can check by taking log at both sides.
  
  by
  
  edited
  
  Set > Cartesian product > relation > function
  
  How cartesian product is a subset of set????
  
  The cartesian product consists of sets as it the cross product of a set with a set resulting in a set consisting of many sets. That's is why it comes under the sets.
  
  $1.N_{r}=2^{n^2}$
  
  $2.N_{f}=n^n$
  
  $3. N_{r}>N_{f}$
  
  $f:R\rightarrow R,$ $f(x)=\sqrt{x}$
  
  Is this a function ? NO !
  
  $f(4)=\sqrt {4}=\pm 2$
  
  But it is certainly a relation.
  
  $\therefore$ Every function is a relation, but not every relation is a function.
  
  $N_r = 2^{n^{2}}$ as total elements in the Cartesian product is $n \times n$ out of which each entry may or may not be included in the relation.
  
  $N_f = n^{n}$ Each element can map to any of the n elements.
  
  Take log of both the $N_f = n^{n}$ and $N_r = 2^{n^{2}}$
  
  we get $n* log n$ and $n^2 log2$ we know that $n^2 log2$ > $n* log n$ so $N_r$ > $N_f$
distilabel_metadata.role: user
distilabel_metadata.raw_output_q_a_detector_0: The provided text is a detailed explanation and solution to a math problem involving the number of binary relations and functions on a set. It contains a question with multiple parts and a corresponding answer for each part. The question asks for expressions for the number of binary relations and functions on a set, and which is larger. The answer provides the expressions and a proof that the number of binary relations is larger than the number of functions for sufficiently large \( n \).
  
  Label: multiple-question-and-answer