PSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE IN COURT: COMMUNICATIONAL AND EPISTEMIC BARRIERS
The present article discusses some pitfalls in regards to the communication between legal decision makers and forensic psychologists, their respective roles and needs and the difficulty in translating psychological knowledge in the courtroom. Three psychological concepts will be discussed in greater detail: dangerousness, best interests of the child and parenting capacity. We underline the importance of specialized training in regard to the pitfalls discussed in this article and of an ethical use of the knowledge in psychology to assist the court.