While the Canadian state fully recognizes two distinct legal traditions (the civil law of French origin and the common law of English origin), a third legal tradition is currently gaining importance and recognition in jurisprudence: the different legal orders of the Indigenous peoples of Canada. One might ask: in what languages can these legal orders be expressed? The title of this article—a phrase by Brenda Child quoted by the jurist John Borrows: “After 400 years, English is now an Anishnaabe language too” (2016, p. 810)—proposes an answer to this question, suggestings that an Indigenous legal order need not be tied to a specific language. The article aims to critically examine this assertion by providing an overview of the issues at stake in the resurgence of Indigenous legal orders in Canada, through an analysis of the role that translation, both inter- and intra-lingual, can play. The issues raised by this particular sort of multilingualism, intrinsic to Indigenous law, bring to the fore another way of understanding intercultural translation as no longer uniquely between two different cultures, but within the same culture, in this case a particular legal system.