The ambivalence of the relatives of individuals who offend
Several criminological theories propose that the relatives of people who offend have the power to influence the conduct of the offender. However, few studies have thus far integrated the reality of these relatives, tending instead to consider it from the standpoint of offenders. The present study argues that a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of social influence requires considering the experiences of the relatives, particularly the effect of the criminal behaviour of someone close to them. The thematic analysis of semi-directed interviews conducted with 18 relatives of offenders showed that they are ambivalent about their experience. They describe both a strong relational bond with the person who has offended and strong moral opposition to their illegal actions. They use various narrative strategies to reduce the uncomfortable tension created by this ambivalence. These strategies not only make it possible to maintain the relationship with the offender but also encourage tolerance of their offending. The potential implications of these findings for criminological theories of social influence are discussed.