Securitization Theories, 1989–2018
Securitization is considered by many scholars as one of the most influential approaches in security studies. Its status derives from its compatibility with theories from a variety of epistemological families and its empirical malleability. However, a number of voices, primarily in sociology, are calling for a meaningful review of its initial boundaries. Some urge a return to a quintessentially Austinian philosophy of language ; some want more emphasis on practices ; and others argue for a study of security instruments. This thematic issue posits that none of these proposals in themselves contain the key to renewing securitization, and instead suggests returning to a more empirical approach to assess scholarly contributions. In so doing, it joins, strengthens, and expands on other ongoing attempts to transcend the divisions that have led securitization studies to an impasse.