Psychoanalysis is not reducible to its setting. The latter embodies a theory of the unconscious—of psychic reality—and the method for apprehending this reality, i.e. the manifestations of the unconscious. To what extent, if at all, does remote analysis, i.e. telepractice, modify the possibilities of applying the method? And what about the transmission of psychoanalysis and of its method in and through new settings? During online supervision, are the conditions of listening to listening really changed? Should psychoanalysis also take into consideration the effects of cyberculture on civilization? In any case, whether in presence or remotely, the analyst’s relationship to his/her desire to analyze must constantly be questioned. This questioning forms the essence of the analyst's ethic.