This article analyzes the community reparation program following the recommendations made by the Equity and Reconciliation Commission, the Moroccan Truth Commission, in 2005. The text examines the way international prescriptions about dealing with a violent past, the so-called "transitional justice", influence the local dynamics of elaboration and implementation of the program and how, at the same time, public policy follows paths that precedes it, at its different scales. The article highlights two processes. On the one hand, community reparation connects actors with different resources and positions: activists who have entered policy making, administrations, local authorities, NGOs, donors, implementing agency (Caisse des Dépôts et de Gestion). The Reparation is the subject of multiple investments which produce heterogeneous definitions of the program. On the other hand, community reparation is formulated in terms of governance and implemented in a managerial way: internationalization goes hand in hand with inclusion in a set of reforms carried out without affecting the balances of power. However, the field work reveals the deployment of unexpected politicizations. They operate in the program's funds appropriation, which confirms local leadership or offers the opportunity to deploy them, in a context of stress on resources.