This article lies within the framework of research in progress and raises the problem of conducting interviews of recruiting with regards to training. In situations of sustaining or recruiting, a meeting between an applicant and examining committee occurs, among others, to linguistic interaction standards that are unwarranted and carry modifications of referentials of the examining committee. Therefore the effect of these interactions result in the examining committee being unable to remain neutral with respect towards the candidate. The objective of our research is to determine the order of ethical questionning and to see what happens at the time of uncommon referential to a referential where there is discussed and negociated consensus that is reached collectively respecting institutional criteria. The construction of a research method does not happen without raising various questions about the association of the position, of the epistemological position of the researcher, and the relationships established with the participants of the field who assume praxis perspective from an ethical point of view. “La visée d’une automie qui reconnaît l’autre comme l’agent de son autonomie.” (Imbert; 1992, p 13.) In this way the researcher finds himself amid a dialectic, between his own knowledge production project and that of the participants of the field who nourrish the reseacher’s project in a sort of alternating research. “Le chercheur apprend, il s’apprend comme chercheur” (Vial, 1998, p. 14), “ou peut-être encore dans une récursivité terrain-chercheur, l’un générant l’autre.” (Vial, 1998, p. 21.) The ethics of research would not be a reflection of accuracy of our entering the field, and in ethical positioning in order to value those who offer their field to us.