Perceptions of practices regarding suspects interview
The main objective of this study was to assess the way French customs officers decide on the methods used to interview suspects. Given the limited theoretical training available in France, it was expected that agents would report using methods that have been described in the scientific literature as harmful to the conduct and effectiveness of interviews. 74 customs officers completed a questionnaire asking them to discuss their use of various methods for interviewing suspects. Some of these methods were considered to be useful, while others were seen as harmful. In line with our expectations, the results indicate that customs officers reported using not only methods considered useful but also those that have been found to be harmful, such as the use of private questioning, maximization of pressure, etc. The officer’s level of experience and whether there was a presumption of guilt also had an impact on the methods used. Analysis of the questions asked showed that leading questions were widely used. Recommendations in terms of professional training are provided.