DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY (CLINICAL VS NON CLINICAL) OF THE FRENCH VERSION OF THE SOCIAL COGNITION AND OBJECT RELATION SCALE, FRENCH VERSION, FOR TAT NARRATIVES
The study aimed at assessing the discriminant validity of the French version of the Social Cognition and Object Relation Scale, French Version. Design: SCORS ratings of TAT narratives were compared across two groups (Non-Clinicals, Clinicals). Method: 114 participants’ TAT narratives (47 Non-Clinicals, 67 Clinicals) were collected and the pictures 1, 2, 3BM, 4 and 13 MF were rated by two independent judges. Then we compared the result of Non-Clinical and Clinical groups. Results demonstrated that interrater reliability was established and fell in the “good” to “excellent” ranges. Results also indicated that the French version of the SCORS was able to differentiate between Non-Clinical and Clinical groups. Implications and future directions are discussed and explored.