The SIPPE is a program designed to address risk factors and promote protective practices in preschool children and their families, through early and intensive intervention. However, the applicability of the eligibility criteria of the SIPPE Program when it comes to refugee and immigrant mothers remains unclear. The present study explores the perception that mental health and psychosocial professionals have of these criteria. A total of 17 individual interviews and three focus groups were conducted with 32 professionals from two CSSS in the Montreal region that serve mostly immigrant populations. The qualitative analysis performed with the NVivo software highlights the perception that participants have of some of the existing criteria as being inadequate for accurately identifying vulnerable refugee or immigrant mothers. Difficulties identified by participants relate to the systematic use of strict administrative criteria, created for non-immigrant mothers, to determine the eligibility of immigrant and refugee mothers. Furthermore, participants perceive that administrative constraints within the SIPPE program have a negative impact on how frequently clinical judgment serves as a basis for decision-making. We also present recommendations in favour of facilitating SIPPE access based on existing evidence-based studies on the variety and specificity of vulnerabilities among immigrants and refugees.