In many sports, better aerodynamics are a serious advantage (at least at the professional level).
Assuming bald people are more aerodynamic than non-bald people, do you think baldness should be considered a form of doping?
Baldness may slightly improve aerodynamics as hair can create some resistance, but it is not a significant enough factor to classify baldness as a form of doping. Doping refers to the use of performance-enhancing drugs or other methods that give athletes an unfair advantage over their competitors, and baldness is not a deliberate action taken to improve athletic performance.

Moreover, baldness is a genetic trait that some individuals may have regardless of their athletic abilities or training, and it would not be fair to penalize athletes for something beyond their control. Furthermore, aerodynamics are just one aspect of sports performance, and they may not necessarily be the most critical factor in determining an athlete's success.

In summary, baldness cannot be considered a form of doping as it is a natural trait that may have a minor effect on aerodynamics, but it is not a deliberate method used to enhance performance.