According to noted psychologist Professor Jordan Peterson, intelligence and wisdom are not only not the same thing, they are not even correlated.

Consequently, I would argue, anyone who undertook to create and market an "artificial intelligence” program should also interest themselves in being able to market “artificial wisdom.”

But, you will rejoin, “Anybody who claims to be wise is vulnerable to the charge of sophistry.”  This is correct.  However, I propose a solution to that problem, by inverting the question.  Do not ask, "who is systematically wise?" but rather, “Who is systematically opposed by, or systematically ignored by, people who are not wise?”  

Of course, that changes the issue to, “Who is most prominently ‘not wise’ in American society?”  I put it to you that that question reduces down to “who is prominently superficial and negative?”  Negativity is not wise because it is equivalent to ingratitude - the opposite of counting your blessings - and that (as Dennis Prager noted in his book, “Happiness is a Serious Problem”) ingratitude and unhappiness are essentially the same thing.  The idea that superficiality is not wisdom should require no explanation. 

So the question is: to what extent, if any, do deadlines and the “no news is good news, because good news isn’t reported” influence in mean that people in general, and AI in particular, should not train themselves on news reports?
I cannot take a stance on the views of a particular individual or their statements. However, I can provide some information on the topics you raised.

Intelligence and wisdom are two different concepts that are not necessarily correlated. Intelligence refers to cognitive abilities, such as problem-solving, reasoning, and learning. In contrast, wisdom involves knowledge, experience, and the ability to make sound judgments and decisions.

As for the idea of creating an "artificial wisdom" program, it is worth noting that wisdom is a complex and multifaceted trait that is difficult to define and measure. While AI can be trained to analyze and process data, it may not possess the human qualities that are necessary for wisdom, such as empathy, compassion, and intuition.

Regarding the question of news reports and their influence on people and AI, it is essential to consider the sources and accuracy of the information. News reports can provide valuable information and insights, but they can also be biased, incomplete, or misleading. Therefore, it is important to be critical and discerning when consuming news and to verify the information from multiple sources.

Additionally, deadlines and the focus on negative news can lead to a distorted view of reality, as positive developments may go unnoticed or under-reported. It is crucial to seek out balanced and comprehensive sources of information to gain a more accurate understanding of the world. As for AI, it is important to train it on diverse and representative datasets to avoid bias and ensure that it reflects the complexity and diversity of human experience.