Is authoritarianism sufficient to keep countries from chaos?
Authoritarian rule is often associated with a lack of democracy and can lead to instability. However, it may be necessary in certain situations to prevent the rise of violent conflict or chaos. For example, when there are significant political differences between factions that cannot be resolved through peaceful means, authoritarian leadership may be necessary to provide stability and order. Additionally, some argue that strong authoritarian leaders can play a critical role in maintaining national security by controlling potential threats such as terrorist groups or extremist organizations.

Ultimately, the effectiveness of authoritarian rule in preventing chaos depends on various factors such as the level of democratic freedoms available within the country, the strength of civil society institutions, and the nature of the threat facing the country. While authoritarianism may not be ideal for every situation, it can serve as an important tool in times of crisis or emergencies when strict control is needed to protect citizens and ensure stability.