I was wondering if the legal argument in suits season 3 episode 14, about getting out of a non-compete in an employment contract, using "Michigan court of appeals" with a weak link in a non-compete, is valid? If not are there some other ways for someone to get out of a non-compete?
The specific case you mentioned ("suits Season 3 Episode 14") does appear to be based on a weak legal argument and may not hold up in a Michigan court of appeals. Non-competes typically include language that prevents employees from working at any competitor within a certain time period or location for a specified period of time after termination.

In this instance, the employee argued that the non-compete should not apply because it was drafted without the input of counsel who knew more about employment law. However, a court would likely find this type of excuse unmeritorious given that all parties involved had access to legal advice and were bound by the terms of the agreement.

There are several other ways for someone to escape a non-compete, including:
1. Filing for bankruptcy protection, which cancels or voids most debts, including non-compete agreements.
2. Getting a written release from the employer providing clear and comprehensive relief from the non-compete obligations.
3. Engaging in conduct that violates the terms of the non-compete, such as moonlighting or working for a direct competitor while still being employed by the original company.
4. Seeking judicial enforcement of the non-compete only in cases where there have been material breaches of its terms, such as unauthorized disclosure of trade secrets or confidential information.
5. Consulting with an attorney specializing in employment law to assess your options and determine whether filing a lawsuit is appropriate in your situation.
It's important to note that every state has different laws regarding non-competes, so it's essential to research the specifics of your own situation before taking action.