Why will Open-Assistant be better or worse than ChatGPT use Pro and Contra arguments.
Open-Assistant may be better than ChatGPT by being open-source. Being an open model allows the community to develop creative uses for the model, enables self-hosting, enables greater competition for hosted inference pricing, reduces the possibility of censorship or secret bias, makes it more accessible to people around the world, and much more. Open-Assistant also has bigger goals than just replicating ChatGPT, such as being able to use APIs and dynamically research information.

However, Open-Assistant may also be worse than ChatGPT. By being an open model, it is more easy for bad actors to misuse Open-Assistant for nefarious reasons, with nobody able to stop them. Open-Assistant also doesn't have a huge company behind it, and its performance may be worse than ChatGPT. Moreover, Open-Assistant may be more expensive to use than ChatGPT due to OpenAI's larger funding and greater access to cloud compute resources.