the adoption of national mental health programme ( nmhp ) by the government of india in august 1982 , was in many ways a landmark event in the history of psychiatry in this country .
recently , in 2012 , we crossed the 30 anniversary of this important event . during the last year , 2014
, the revised national mental health policy of india and the draft national health poilcy , 2015 have been released .
a number of exhaustive reviews of the mental health program over the last three decades have been undertaken by professionals .
it would be appropriate and useful to put on record our impressions of those eventful days which led to this crucial development .
it is important because many of the stalwarts who played a central role in this development are no more on the scene , and others are also moving on in life .
the idea of developing national programmes of mental health started with world health organization ( w.h.o . ) , mental health division under the leadership of the then director dr .
the expert committee meeting on  organization of mental health services in developing countries  held in 1974 at addis ababa marked an important expression of the w.h.o .
this was followed by the launch of the seven country ( brazil , colombia , egypt , india , philippines , senegal , sudan ) , project  strategies for extending mental health care ( 19751981 ) ,  to implement the 1974 recommendations at the level of general health care . a formal resolution ,
urging all member countries to develop nmhp was 1 time adopted in 1979 meeting of the w.h.o .
some initial efforts to develop national programs were started in some african countries , but india was the first major country to adopt it at the national level .
the experiences of bengaluru and chandigarh psychiatric centers provided the technical support for decentralizing and deprofessionalizing mental health care .
these studies from these two centers demonstrated the large numbers without essential mental health care , their impact on the ill individuals , families and community .
further , the efforts of the two centers also demonstrated the feasibility of integrating mental health care with general health care .
all of these efforts provided the background to the development of the nmhp in 1982 . soon after these initial efforts other centres and professionals demonstrated the relevance of the approach in their centres .
programs for many years , including contributions to the meetings in addis ababa , 1974 , and manila , 1979 .
collaborating center in mental health , chandigarh . in 1980 , he moved to a.i.i.m.s .
his presence in delhi helped to give a new focus on the development of the nmhp .
bisht , director general of health services , dr . wig ( new delhi ) , dr .
the group met a number of times and discussed the broad outlines of the nmhp .
the number of psychiatrists at that time were around 1000 and many of the medical colleges did not have full departments of psychiatry .
following the meetings , finally in february 1981 a major effort was made to write down an outline of the proposed nmhp .
each member produced a draft of a separate chapter , which was discussed in detail by the group and modified in the light of the group discussions . at the end of 3 days , we had the draft of the nmhp .
after the meeting in lucknow , the draft was circulated to other three members and their view incorporated .
the next major event was a 2 days workshop of about 70 leading mental health professionals of india in new delhi in july , 1981 . in this meeting ,
while almost everybody favored the national initiative in this matter and more financial support by government of india , there were sharp differences about the model to be adopted for the extension of mental health care to the total country .
there were some professionals who felt that all mental health care should occur through the psychiatrists .
we recall , one senior psychiatrist expressing the view ,  if necessary we will go by helicopters to see patients in villages to start treatment .
expert committee recommendations , for extending the mental health services through the network of existing primary health care centres by training general doctors and health workers in recognition and treatment of common mental disorders .
some senior members strongly felt that it will dilute the importance of psychiatry as a medical specialty if all health personnel can treat psychiatric patients with drugs .
other participants felt equally strongly that if we have to provide at least a minimum of essential mental health services to majority of our population , there is no alternative but to extent mental health services through primary health care services .
the choice was between an ideal psychiatric care for only a limited few in the urban areas or at least essential services for major serious and common mental disorders for vast majority of the population of india both in the rural and urban areas .
the experiences of both bengaluru and chandigarh centers to integrate mental health care with general health care at sakalawara and raipur rani centers provided support for the latter approach as both feasible and useful .
a revised nmhp document emerged from this meeting for further consideration of the ministry of health and family welfare .
in august 1982 , the second national workshop was convened in new delhi to take forward the program .
this was to coincide with the 2 yearly meeting of the central council of health and family welfare , which was attended by health ministers of all the states of india .
there were about 30 participants which included apart from leading psychiatrists of india , representative of directorate of health service , indian council of medical research , indian medical council , w.h.o .
, searo , national institute of mental health and neuro sciences bengaluru , indian medical association , leading clinical psychologists , sociologists and representative from ministries of health , social welfare , labor , planning commission , university grants commission etc . , it was certainly one of the mostly widely representative group of experts ever assembled in the country to consider the mental health issues and approve the draft of the nmhp , which had already been discussed and agreed by leading mental health specialists 1-year earlier in july , 1981 .
there were broad agreement and appreciation of this mental health initiative at the national level .
armed with the support of the second workshop , we were now ready to take this draft program to central council of health and family welfare which was meeting a fortnight later and which was the highest national body to give government of india 's approval to the program .
we were feeling very happy and confident not realizing that there were still many beaureacratic hurdles to cross before reaching the goal .
we were informed by the central directorate of health that once the draft of the nmhp has been finalized and approved by two workshops , it will be put before the central council of health which was meeting on 1820 august , 1982 and there should be no difficulty in that .
the central council of health is the highest body in the country , and the meeting is attended by the health ministers and directors of health of all states of india with other high health officials .
however , in the evening before the meeting , we got the bad news that the item of mental health program has not been even included in the agenda .
it was heart breaking news that in spite of all our efforts this item would not be considered , a hurried meeting was held between dr .
he reasoned that if the secretary declined to meet us next day we will have no option left .
it will be better to take the risk and reach secretary health 's residence unannounced early morning and persuade him to include the item in the agenda .
he was visibly upset at this intrusion into his privacy but politely asked the purpose of this visit .
it was explained that it was not for any personal work but we feel very strongly that item of nmhp was very important for the country and that is why we have come to seek his help to put it on agenda in that morning meeting of central health council . after a brief discussion , mr .
siddhu said that he can not promise anything as the agenda for the meeting is already very heavy , but he will see what can be done .
when the meeting started at 11 a.m. , the item of mental health was still not in the agenda . at lunch time , joint secretary health ms .
adarsh misra brought the good news that the item has been listed for discussion at 3 p.m. she also showed us the draft resolution .
the language was not clearly stating the approval of the nmhp but was supportive and appreciative by saying 
 we waited with baited breath when the item came for consideration toward the end of the day .
we felt overwhelmed by the importance of this momentous decision , which was to shape the mental health movement in this country for next many decades .
looking back , there were many people who played crucial roles in the development of the nmhp which include the committee which drafted the first document in lucknow in february 1981 , the participants in the two large workshops in new delhi in july , 1981 and in august 1982 .
sidhu , health secretary 's residence on the morning of the meeting and the generosity and foresight of mr .
siddhu to include the item in the agenda at the last minute for the meeting of the central council of health .
it is important to recognize that in india , there were earlier efforts at developing mental health care as part of the general health care , starting with the bhore committee report . under the leadership of dr .
sushila nayar , in the 1960 's as part of the mudaliar committee report a detailed plan of district mental health units , school mental health program , training of health personnel and most importantly , public mental health education were planned .
the srivatsava committee report , which was a precursor to the village level community health worker program included mental health at the most peripheral level of health care in the country .
the significance of the nmhp with its three broad objectives , namely , 
 to ensure availability and accessibility of minimum mental health care for all in the foreseeable future , particularly to the most vulnerable and underprivileged of the population;to encourage application of mental health knowledge in general health care and in social development ; andto promote community participation in mental health services development and to stimulate effort toward self - help in the community . 
  to ensure availability and accessibility of minimum mental health care for all in the foreseeable future , particularly to the most vulnerable and underprivileged of the population ; to encourage application of mental health knowledge in general health care and in social development ; and to promote community participation in mental health services development and to stimulate effort toward self - help in the community .
specific approaches suggested for the implementation of the nmhp : 
 diffusion of mental health skills to the periphery of the health service systemappropriate appointment of tasks in mental health careequitable and balanced territorial distribution of resourcesintegration of basic mental health care with general health serviceslinkage to community development , there was a framework for the planners and professionals to develop the mental health program for the country . 
 
diffusion of mental health skills to the periphery of the health service system appropriate appointment of tasks in mental health care equitable and balanced territorial distribution of resources integration of basic mental health care with general health services linkage to community development , there was a framework for the planners and professionals to develop the mental health program for the country .
there are a large number of documents recording the progress of nmhp in the last three decades . and new research to demonstrate the feasibility ,
it speaks of the commitment of the professionals and planners that there has been a continuous focus as well as revision of the nmhp during this period .
briefly , gradually , from the two centers pioneering the community mental health programme , the program has been extended to include > 220 districts , with the involvement of almost all psychiatric institutions in the implementation of the nmhp .
the strengthening of the mental hospitals and setting up of centres of excellence for training of mental health professionals is an another important development .
the voluntary organizations have brought rich approaches to address the mental health needs in the areas of rehabilitation , drug dependence , family support , suicide prevention , disaster mental health care , school mental health care , and public mental health education .
i new mental health legislation was enacted in 1987 and already a more progressive mental health bill is in the parliament .
the funding for nmhp has grown over the three decades , with a significant proportion of the funds remaining unutilized . the formulation of the nmhp , in 1982 , was an important milestone in the development of mental health care in the country .
the experiences have not only benefitted the country but also influenced the development of mental health services in countries of asia and africa .
however , india has changed in its political , social , economic , demographic and medical care areas .
there is also need for the growing private sector psychiatry to be involved in the nmhp .
an approach of recognizing the needs of the total population , utilizing the available community resources and fully involving the different sectors of the society .
it is important to recognize that the new mental health policy , 2014 and the national health policy , 2015 , both recognize the basic premise of the nmhp , 1982 , namely , integration with the primary care approach so as to identify those in need of such services and refer them to the appropriate site and follow - up with medication and tele - medicine linkages ( 3 , section 4.6.3 ) .
the indian developments have been in line with the international developments in mental health care . against this background of developments ,
mental health professionals have the responsibility of continuing to provide leadership in this area of mental health care to reach the total population .
it is important to recognize that in india , there were earlier efforts at developing mental health care as part of the general health care , starting with the bhore committee report . under the leadership of dr .
sushila nayar , in the 1960 's as part of the mudaliar committee report a detailed plan of district mental health units , school mental health program , training of health personnel and most importantly , public mental health education were planned .
the srivatsava committee report , which was a precursor to the village level community health worker program included mental health at the most peripheral level of health care in the country .
the significance of the nmhp with its three broad objectives , namely , 
 to ensure availability and accessibility of minimum mental health care for all in the foreseeable future , particularly to the most vulnerable and underprivileged of the population;to encourage application of mental health knowledge in general health care and in social development ; andto promote community participation in mental health services development and to stimulate effort toward self - help in the community . 
  to ensure availability and accessibility of minimum mental health care for all in the foreseeable future , particularly to the most vulnerable and underprivileged of the population ; to encourage application of mental health knowledge in general health care and in social development ; and to promote community participation in mental health services development and to stimulate effort toward self - help in the community .
specific approaches suggested for the implementation of the nmhp : 
 diffusion of mental health skills to the periphery of the health service systemappropriate appointment of tasks in mental health careequitable and balanced territorial distribution of resourcesintegration of basic mental health care with general health serviceslinkage to community development , there was a framework for the planners and professionals to develop the mental health program for the country . 
 
diffusion of mental health skills to the periphery of the health service system appropriate appointment of tasks in mental health care equitable and balanced territorial distribution of resources integration of basic mental health care with general health services linkage to community development , there was a framework for the planners and professionals to develop the mental health program for the country .
there are a large number of documents recording the progress of nmhp in the last three decades . and new research to demonstrate the feasibility ,
it speaks of the commitment of the professionals and planners that there has been a continuous focus as well as revision of the nmhp during this period . briefly , gradually , from the two centers pioneering the community mental health programme , the program has been extended to include > 220 districts , with the involvement of almost all psychiatric institutions in the implementation of the nmhp .
the strengthening of the mental hospitals and setting up of centres of excellence for training of mental health professionals is an another important development .
the voluntary organizations have brought rich approaches to address the mental health needs in the areas of rehabilitation , drug dependence , family support , suicide prevention , disaster mental health care , school mental health care , and public mental health education .
i new mental health legislation was enacted in 1987 and already a more progressive mental health bill is in the parliament .
the funding for nmhp has grown over the three decades , with a significant proportion of the funds remaining unutilized .
the formulation of the nmhp , in 1982 , was an important milestone in the development of mental health care in the country .
the experiences have not only benefitted the country but also influenced the development of mental health services in countries of asia and africa .
however , india has changed in its political , social , economic , demographic and medical care areas .
there is also need for the growing private sector psychiatry to be involved in the nmhp .
an approach of recognizing the needs of the total population , utilizing the available community resources and fully involving the different sectors of the society .
it is important to recognize that the new mental health policy , 2014 and the national health policy , 2015 , both recognize the basic premise of the nmhp , 1982 , namely , integration with the primary care approach so as to identify those in need of such services and refer them to the appropriate site and follow - up with medication and tele - medicine linkages ( 3 , section 4.6.3 ) .
the indian developments have been in line with the international developments in mental health care . against this background of developments ,
mental health professionals have the responsibility of continuing to provide leadership in this area of mental health care to reach the total population .
 the adoption of the national mental health programme ( nmhp ) in august 1982 was a milestone in the history of indian psychiatry . 
 such an ambitious program was formulated at a time where there were < 1000 psychiatrists is a triumph of need for mental health care in the country . 
 the story of the nmhp , both in terms of the technical forces and the personalities needs to be recorded for posterity . 
 the current article recalls the community mental health initiatives of bengaluru and chandigarh centers providing the reason for integrating mental health care with general health care and the support of the world health organization , along with the role of mental health professionals and the health administrators . 
 the lesson that come through is the value of working together with different professionals for the common good . 
 recording the events for posterity is especially timely in view of the formulation of a new mental health policy and the revision of the national health policy during the last few months . 
INTRODUCTION
PREPARING THE DRAFT OF THE PROGRAMME
THE FIRST NATIONAL WORKSHOP TO FINALIZE THE PROGRAMME
THE SECOND WORKSHOP OF NATIONAL MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMME
MEETING OF THE CENTRAL COUNCIL OF HEALTH
Importance of the national mental health programme, 1982
Progress
Looking to the future