arterial supply to the left colon and rectosigmoid colon is from the inferior mesenteric artery ( i m a ) classically by means of left colic artery ( lca ) , 2 - 3 sigmoid branches , and superior rectal artery .
i m a originates from the front of the abdominal aorta , near its left margin just below the third part of the duodenum at the level of 3rd lumbar vertebra .
it runs downwards arching slightly to the left , and as it crosses the left common iliac , its name arbitrarily changes to the superior rectal ( or hemorrhoidal ) artery .
pattern of branching however is reported to deviate from this classical description [ 15 ] .
detailed knowledge of the anatomical variations of the visceral branches of the abdominal aorta is of extreme clinical importance , particularly , when performing laparoscopic abdominal surgery .
further , colonic vascular supply has some weak areas which have been reported to be highly predisposed to ischemic colitis [ 68 ] .
griffiths ' point at the left colic flexure [ 9 , 10 ] and the sudeck 's point at the rectosigmoid region [ 4 , 11 , 12 ] are notable examples . in the presence of stenotic or occlusive disease of i m a or superior mesenteric artery ( sma ) , the presence of collateral channels between either artery is critical for maintaining the integrity of vascular supply to the affected region .
patency and continuity of these collateral channels , namely , colic marginal artery and meandering mesenteric artery , are highly variable .
moreover , knowledge of the pattern of collateral supply also constitutes a critical point of consideration during colic resections in cases of cancer management .
the aim of the present study therefore was to examine the variant pattern of blood supply to the left colon and rectosigmoid regions in a black kenyan population .
the study was carried out using fifty - seven formalin embalmed cadavers ( 28 male , 27 female ) obtained from the department of human anatomy , university of nairobi , used during routine dissection .
any specimen with demonstrable pathology or evidence of previous surgical intervention in the area of interest was excluded from the study .
small intestines were displaced to the right and parietal peritoneum covering retroperitoneal structures on posterior abdominal wall cleared to further reveal the mesenteric arteries and their branches .
inferior mesenteric artery was identified and its vertebral level of origin was determined . using a sliding vernier caliper somet cn-25 1234 ( accurate to 1  mm ) , diameter of i m a at its origin and length of the artery to its point of division were measured .
inferior mesenteric artery most frequently gave off the abdominal aorta at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra ( l3 ) ( 38% ) being distributed above l3 as far as l1 ( 31% ) and below it up to l4/l5 junction in 31% of the cases .
the origin of the i m a was 6.09  1.46  cm ( 1.28.4  cm ) below origin of sma .
mean length of i m a was 3.56  1.03  cm ( range : 27  cm ) while the mean diameter at the origin was 4.1  0.94  mm ( 26  mm ) .
the most common branching pattern , 23 ( 39.6% ) cases , of inferior mesenteric artery was into lca and common sigmoid trunk which gave off two ( 2 ) sigmoid arteries .
classical branching pattern of i m a was observed in only 7 ( 12% ) cases .
left colic artery most frequently divided into ascending and descending branches in 32 ( 55.5% ) cases .
sigmoid colon was 26.2  9.5  cm ( 10.651  cm ) long and was supplied by 1 - 2 branches given off by inferior mesenteric artery in 72.4% of the cases .
first and second sigmoid branches were both most frequently given off at the level of 4th lumbar vertebra ( l4 ) , whereas the third and fourth were given off at l5 .
connecting arterial channels between left colic artery and superior mesenteric artery ( figure 1(a ) ) , and between left colic artery and celiac artery ( figure 1(b ) ) was observed . in another case , left colic artery gave off a transverse branch to the descending colon and proceeded to give three of the four sigmoid arteries ( figures 2(a ) and 2(b ) ) .
macroscopic anastomotic channels from the ascending branch of left colic artery to descending and transverse branches were present in 17 ( 29.3% ) and 7 ( 12.1% ) specimens , respectively . ascending branch bifurcated into right and left branches in 44 ( 76% ) specimens whereby the distance from point of bifurcation to the gut wall was between 0.210  cm ( 3.37  2.13  cm ) . ascending branch of left colic artery assumed a transverse course in 8 ( 14% ) cases .
regarding point of contact with gut wall , this vessel coursed to mid descending colon and splenic flexure in 13 ( 22.4% ) and 44 ( 76% ) cases , respectively .
the ascending branch of lca anastomosed with the left branch of middle colic artery in 54 ( 93% ) specimens was studied .
colic marginal artery was continuous ( external diameter > 1  mm ) , somewhat continuous ( < 1  mm ) , and absent at splenic flexure and the sigmoid colon as shown in table 1 .
macroscopic anastomosis between rectosigmoid and inferior sigmoid and superior rectal arteries was seen in 12 ( 80% ) and 11 ( 73.3% ) of the cases .
arc of riolan , a short part of the colic marginal artery located in the region of the left colic flexure , was observed in 9 ( 16% ) of the specimens ( figure 1(c ) ) .
inferior mesenteric artery and its branches have been grafted and used as alternatives to the internal thoracic artery in coronary revascularization due to less atherosclerotic involvement and higher success rates [ 1315 ] .
in addition , the length of i m a from its origin to the sudeck 's point is critical during ligation of the artery in colorectal surgery .
an adequately long i m a therefore will provide for feasibility and safety of such surgical procedures . in the present study ,
the mean length of i m a was 3.65  1.03  mm which lies within the reported range of 27  cm .
classical branching pattern of i m a was seen only in seven ( 12% ) cases which compares with that by golligher   of 15% in a series of 100 cadavers but slightly lower than that reported by basmajian   in 28.9% .
most frequent branching patterns of i m a were left colic artery and a common sigmoid trunk .
concordantly , a common trunk for left colic and sigmoid arteries has been observed in 5356% of specimens in other populations [ 4 , 9 ] .
two or three sigmoid arteries have been observed in 9673% [ 4 , 16 , 18 ] similar to the findings in the present study of 72.4% .
ascending branch of the left colic artery coursed to splenic flexure in 44 ( 76% ) and to mid descending colon in only 13 ( 22.4% ) cases .
this finding affirms the assertion by lorenzini et al .   that vascular continuity of the left colon is not constant enough to assure the surgeon for possible interruptions , whereas splenic flexure on the other hand is a well - vascularised region .
smaller retroperitoneal branches have also been shown to augment the left colic and middle colic arteries in supplying the splenic flexure .
this study therefore further supports the need for extra caution during operations in the left colon due to its tenuous blood supply .
similarly , division of the superior rectal artery distal to the sudeck 's point in the presence of insufficient or lacking anastomosis between the superior rectal artery and the last sigmoid branch has been reported to cause postoperative ischemic stricture .
colorectal surgeons and other surgeons working in this region should therefore always take into consideration this fact to avoid any inadvertent assault to this precarious blood supply .
colic marginal artery , a tier of the right , middle , and left colic arteries , is usually of small caliber which increases with occlusion of either the sma or i m a . meandering mesenteric artery is an arterial trunk connecting sma and i m a at their roots forming a second colic arterial arcade .
presence of this other collateral channel signifies severe stenotic disease or occlusion of either the sma or i m a .
this arterial channel courses along the base of the colonic mesentery . running between the roots of the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries , the meandering mesenteric artery unlike the arc of riolan is not part of the marginal colic artery .
its absence in this study is concordant with previous reports of a range between 0 and 18% [ 21 , 22 ] .
branching pattern of i m a shows variations from the previously reported cases which might help to account for some of the untoward outcomes observed following colon surgery .
careful attempt to delineate the branching pattern of the inferior mesenteric intraoperatively is recommended to avert possible dismal surgical outcome .
an angiographic study to further delineate functionality of the arterial anastomoses in this region is recommended in living subjects .
 
 background . branching pattern of inferior mesenteric artery ( i m a ) and pattern of vascular supply to the left colon and rectosigmoid areas , though important during colorectal surgery , display interethnic variations . 
 further , these regions have notable vascular  weak points  reported to be highly susceptible to ischemic colitis . 
 this study aimed at evaluating the branching pattern of i m a in a black african population . 
 materials and methods . 
 fifty - seven formalin - embalmed cadavers ( 28 male , 27 female ) were studied . 
 the length , branching pattern , and diameter of i m a at its origin were recorded . 
 results . 
 i m a mean length and diameter at origin were 30.57  10.0  mm and 4.10  0.9  mm , respectively . i m a most frequently branched into left colic artery and a common sigmoid trunk in 23 cases while the classical branching pattern was observed in only 7 cases . 
 colic marginal artery was absent at the splenic flexure and sigmoid colon in 7 and 5 cases , respectively . 
 arc of riolan was observed in 9 cases . 
 conclusion . branching pattern of i m a shows variations from the previously reported cases which might help account for some of the untoward outcomes observed following colon surgery . an angiographic study to further delineate functionality of the arterial anastomoses in this region is recommended . 
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion