Reproducibility and Standard Deviation Would a set of chemical data with a relative standard deviation of 0.6% or 20% be more reproducible?

My reasoning is that because it's easier to make mistakes and have a wide range of data, the 20% would be more reproducible, even though it is not accurate.

A RSD of 0.6% would be extremely precise and therefore harder to reproduce.

At least this is my thoughts.  Thank you for your help!
Both accuracy and precision are desired for proper data analysis. They are not mutually exclusive. This is heavily dependent on the person and the measurement tool as well. You must have heard of the idiom "A bad workman quarrels with his tools"... this is true in science as well. Even if you have million dollar instrument, and the operator is unskilled, the data will be garbage. The premise that it is easier to make mistakes is not valid and generally RSD of 1-5 % is routine in scientific measurements. An RSD of 20% would be considered too high.