Is enlightened cognition more than its parts? Is enlightened cognition, in any Buddhist tradition, more than its parts?

I'm asking cos:


(philosophical interpretations) they say that for Buddhists there is nothing more to a thing than its parts. But,
every part of anything (it seems) is conditioned and only of a practical value.
Mahayana-Nagarjuna philosophy states everything is conditioned &amp; comprised of parts. Original Buddhism does not. The impression is your question arises because of illogical philosophy, which makes the philosophy sound contradictory to you. The original Buddha was fully enlightened thus explained reality without flawed description. Enlightenment leads to the permanent end of suffering. Since enlightenment 'uproots' the causes of suffering, there is no longer spiritual work to do. So the 'parts' either end (in redundancy) or, otherwise, are permanently established.