Anatta & Atman the same thing? I read that atman is pure bliss
I read that anatta is pure bliss

-Is it possible that these deep concepts are pointing to the same thing at the end of the day?
-Is atman the same as anatta in anyway? If yes/no then why?
-Is anatman the same as atta in anyway? If yes/no then why?
I have never read 'anatta' is 'pure bliss'. 'Bliss' is a feeling where as 'anatta' is a characteristic of things that is realised by wisdom. 

As for 'Atman', this appears to be a concept that changed &amp; evolved throughout the history of Brahmanism &amp; Hinduism. At the time of the Buddha, it appears 'Atman' did not mean bliss or a transcendent state. 


  The earliest use of word "Ātman" in Indian texts is found in the Rig Veda (RV X.97.11). Yāska, the ancient Indian grammarian, commenting on
  this Rigvedic verse, accepts the following meanings of Ātman: the
  pervading principle, the organism in which other elements are united
  and the ultimate sentient principle.


This is probably why the word 'anatta' does not mean 'not-bliss'.