Are these translations of the Sutta Nipata correct? A Hindu site by the name "Agniveer" has claimed that Buddha never rejected the Vedas. To substantiate their claim, they have quoted a few verses from the Sutta Nipata to show Buddha's respect for the Vedas: 


  In Sutta Nipat 192, Mahatma Buddha says that:
  
  Vidwa Cha Vedehi Samechcha Dhammam Na Uchchavacham Gachhati
  Bhooripanjo.
  
  People allow sense-organs to dominate and keep shuffling between high
  and low positions. But the scholar who understands Vedas understands
  Dharma and does not waver.
  
  Sutta Nipat 503:
  
  Yo Vedagu Gyanarato Sateema …….
  
  One should support a person who is master of Vedas, contemplative,
  intelligent, helpful if you desire to inculcate similar traits.
  
  Sutta Nipat 1059:
  
  Yam Brahmanam Vedagum Abhijanjya Akinchanam Kamabhave Asattam……
  
  One gets free from worldly pains if he is able to understand a Vedic
  Scholar who has no wealth and free from attraction towards worldly
  things.
  
  Sutta Nipat 1060:
  
  Vidwa Cha So Vedagu Naro Idha Bhavabhave Sangam Imam Visajja…..
  
  I state that one who understands the Vedas rejects attraction towards
  the world and becomes free from sins.
  
  Sutta Nipat 846:
  
  Na Vedagu Diththia Na Mutiya Sa Manameti Nahi Tanmayoso….
  
  One who knows Vedas does not acquire false ego. He is not affected by
  hearsay and delusions.
  
  Sutta Nipat 458:
  
  Yadantagu Vedagu Yanjakaale Yassahuti Labhe Taras Ijjeti Broomi
  
  I state that one who acquires Ahuti in Havan of a Vedic scholar gets
  success.
  
  Now people who post these on internet say that Gautam Buddha didn't
  opposed Vedas he opposed the evil practices done in name of Vedas like
  animal sacrifice, caste system


Now, personally I have found many of the site's claims and quotations unreliable. However, I would still like to verify these verses so could anybody tell me if these quotations are true or fabricated?
The quotes may be real, but their translation is probably not. 

Sanskrit (and Pali) root "ved-" stands for gnosis, knowledge, understanding. The name of Vedas comes from the same root, they are supposed to be collections of (religious) knowledge. Using this coincidence, it looks like instead of translating the words such as vedehi, vedagu etc. as e.g. having known, expert/erudite etc. - they left them untranslated and made it look as if they were referring to the Vedas.

For example in the first phrase they have quoted 


  ...Vidvā ca vedehi samecca dhammaṃ... 


probably means something like


  ...having known and having learned, thanks to encountering Dharma...


There is no way vidva and vedehi can refer to Vedas, because these are clearly verb forms, not nouns.

And so on.