Is this concept of Non-self correct? **

I was trying to figure out the meaning of Non-self one day and
stumbled upon this idea. Please bear with me as this is a bit long...

**
There are four great elements which are responsible for all conceivable objects and forms. If we take a human being, we have a body made of the 4 great elements and a consciousness. As we know there is no such thing called a person beyond the grammatical meaning, therefore neither mind or body is a person or a soul or any such thing.
Let's expand this to a universal level, the same way a body host a consciousness, the universe hosts all consciousnesses. So the assumption here is that 4 great elements provide the infrastructure for the birth of a consciousness. if we forget the identities like human,animal,heavenly,etc, what we have is a sea of 4 great elements that facilitate the existence of all so called &quot;beings&quot;. this shows an uncanny resemblance to what we call a being.
- Allow me to elaborate -
A body is a housing for a consciousness, the body consist of the 4 elements.
The universe is a housing for consciousnesses, the universe consist of the 4 elements.
Take into account that according to the teaching, the consciousness is not a permanent one, it is explained as a static that occurs and ceases with every though,recognition,comparison,etc.
Taken as a static, a consciousness does not even last a second. Bearing this in mind, allow me to end the question.
*

If consciousness is a static like phenomenon, and the body taken out
of its uniformed identity resembles the universe itself, can one find
that the non-self idea within this context?

I know that this is very philosophical, but this is how Buddhism's discussions have happened in the canon and the only way to discuss
deeper concepts. as i expecct my friends here to be more than
signposts that point directions, i have asked this here and i hope the
question is not going to be flagged or deleted because of its long and
philosophical nature.**
"Monks, I will teach you the All. Listen &amp; pay close attention. I will
  speak."
  
  "As you say, lord," the monks responded.
  
  The Blessed One said, "What is the All? Simply the eye &amp; forms, ear &amp;
  sounds, nose &amp; aromas, tongue &amp; flavors, body &amp; tactile sensations,
  intellect &amp; ideas. This, monks, is called the All. [1] Anyone who
  would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if
  questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement,
  would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief.
  Why? Because it lies beyond range."
  - Sabba Sutta


Universe is a concept. What you call universe in reality is just eye &amp; forms, ear &amp; sounds etc. etc.

So the eye &amp; forms are not-self, ear and sounds are not-self...
This idea you have been contemplating represents(in reality) just the mind and thoughts which are also not-self.