How do I reconcile the Dhamma Refuge with blind faith? I read in Wikipedia and also in the suttas that refuge in Dhamma is "verified", as follows:


  Svakkhato Bhagavata dhammo sanditthiko akaliko ehipassiko opanayiko
  paccattam vedittabbo vinnuhiti.
  
  "Svakkhato" The Dhamma taught by the Blessed One is Excellent in the
  beginning, Excellent in the middle and Excellent in the end - all of
  Buddha's Discourses are consistent and teach the same truth.
  "Sanditthika" Dhamma is self-evident and can be understood in this
  life itself. "Akaliko" Dhamma, Noble Truths, can not be changed nor
  can they be altered over time. "Ehipassiko" "come and see"; Buddha's
  Dhamma is to be investigated. "Opanayika" Dhamma can only be
  understood by oneself. "Paccattam vedittabbo vinnuhiti" Dhamma is for
  the wise to understand and realize.
  
  
  
  The teaching is well explained by the Buddha—visible in this very
  life, immediately effective, inviting inspection, relevant, so that
  sensible people can know it for themselves.
  
  svākkhāto bhagavatā dhammo sandiṭṭhiko akāliko ehipassiko opaneyyiko
  paccattaṃ veditabbo viññūhīti.


Can I believe in things I have not verified for myself but still be a Buddhist?

Do the words "veditabbo viññūhīti" refer to direct experience? Or can it be merely  fluency in theories?
One can be a Buddhist:


one believes in what is consistent with the teaching


verified by oneself
unverified but believed due to the confidence in the teaching



If one believes what is consistent even it is unverified there is no harm.