Request for explanation on heart sutta This what I read part of heart sutta states;

So, in emptiness, there is no body, 
no feeling, no thought, 
no will, no consciousness. 
There are no eyes, no ears, 
no nose, no tongue, 
no body, no mind. 
There is no seeing, no hearing, 
no smelling, no tasting, 
no touching, no imagining. 
There is nothing seen, nor heard, 
nor smelled, nor tasted, 
nor touched, nor imagined.

apparently it is about the death of being to me.Also this description perfectly match and experience in coma or unconsciousness state of an individual.

can I get proper and profound explanation for above?
As Mishu mentioned, the oldest copy we have is in Classical Chinese. Even though many of the characters of the sutra still exist in modern Chinese and Japanese, there are subtleties that are very hard to translate. The most difficult word to convey into English is the word translated as &quot;no&quot;, 無 (wu in Chinese, mu in Japanese). It's not exactly as our word for &quot;no&quot; or &quot;not&quot;, the character for this in Chinese is 不 (bu). Both appear in the sutra:

色不異空，空不異色
form does not differ from the void, and the void does not differ from form.

and

無眼耳鼻舌身意，無色聲香味觸法
no eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, nor perception; no form, sound, smell, taste, tangible objects nor objects of mind;

So there must be a difference in meaning, otherwise they would have used the same character in both cases.
The origin of the character 無 is a pictogram of a man holding something in both hands:

This visible etymology is lost in the modern simplified version of the character: 无.
In Classical texts, it means a complete absence of anything, which in English we would equate with void.
The character in the earliest translations chosen for the Sanskrit shunya (emptiness) is usually 空, the etymology being a sky without clouds. It is therefore closer to describing the emptiness of a cup than total void. You may wonder why they chose 空 over 無, since the meaning of the latter is closer to shunya. The reason for this is probably because 無 was already used in Daoist texts, like the paradox of acting without intention (wu wei 無為). Zen (Chan) Buddhists in China borrowed this concept to help understand related ideas in Buddhism (specifically the limitations of language to capture meaning and the lack of substantial being in the cosmos). So Mu in Japanese has fundamentally this meaning: there is no substantiality to things, and language does not capture all possible descriptions of reality.
This is how it's used in the Heart Sutra: it doesn't literally mean there are no senses, it means something like:

無眼: seeing without conceptualizing it (like the difference between to see and to observe, the latter being a conscious action)
無耳: hearing without listening
etc.