Does Krishnamurti claim of No Path, No Progress, No Goal fit with Buddhist thought? Quoted below is an article posted on BuddhaNet Magazine relating Krishnamurti's philosophy with Buddhism. The writer relates Krishnamurti's view that there is "no "path", no procedures, no organization, and no rules" with Buddhism referring to The Sutra of the Heart. 

The writer claimed that this Sutra teaches that "There is ... no path, no wisdom, no attainment..." I haven't read this Sutra, but I have a hard time following anything which states that there is no "Wisdom"! If what the person says is true then it's wisdom and if false then there is wisdom!

Learning from other schools of thought, the critical response for anyone who says " listen to me there is no wisdom" is that what he/she says is meaningless because it fit perfectly with the liar paradox.

At the end of the article, the writer quoting to a Buddist teacher said that the Buddha "compromised" himself by teaching on the two different levels...  and that Krishnamurti's view is identical with the higher level of teaching.


  ....
  
  To Krishnamurti there is no "path", no procedures, no organization, and no rules that should be laid down by men for other men to follow
  on the road to enlightenment. As part of the path, Buddhists must
  observe a very typical, man-made, structure which begins at the top
  with The Three Precious Ones: the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Sangha.
  Each of these pillars has subsets of rules associated with it: The
  Five Skandhas, The Eight Siddhis, etc. Some would have us believe that
  learning all these articles of faith are necessary for enlightenment.
  
  Much Buddhist literature suggests that in following Buddhism there is
  a great object that one must attain and that one progresses towards
  this goal as one takes each step along the path. To Krishnamurti
  setting a psychological goal and working for progress in any direction
  will only lead to more confusion and suffering. Any attempts at
  psychological self-betterment will amount to no more than just one
  more futile duplication of many similar past efforts, all of which had
  previously failed.
  
  The typical pattern of human behavior that we always seem to fall
  into, perhaps by virtue of conditioning, is the "work for a reward"
  stereotype. One finds a religion and sees something desirable in it
  which becomes an object of attainment. The next step is to devise a
  plan to acquire the object, and finally, with great deliberation we
  set about to carry out that plan with hard, unrelenting work.
  
  Krishnamurti tells us that the "work for a reward" operandi has been
  tried countless times by homo sapiens, but it has never led us to
  anything new or different in the area of spiritual enlightenment. What
  do we make of all this? Buddhist leaders round the world tell us that
  there are Buddhist goals and a path of hard work and attainment for
  reaching these goals.
  
  Here again Krishnamurti seems to be more in agreement with the very
  core of Buddhist teachings than the Buddhists themselves. The Sutra of
  the Heart of Transcendent Knowledge sounds more like Krishnamurti than
  does many of the Buddhist teachers: "There is ... no path, no wisdom,
  no attainment, and no nonattainment ..." Here Krishnamurti is telling
  us to live up to the precepts of this great Buddhist Sutra. He is not
  telling us to follow a path, but to under stand that there is no path.
  He tells this just as bluntly and simply as the Sutra does. There is
  no apparent sympathy or embellishments for the benefit of those who
  either fail to understand or for those who have beliefs in goals to
  which they must continue to cling.


http://www.buddhanet.net/khrisna.htm
The idea there is no path is itself a path, which obviously has a goal. If there was no goal, why did KM teach? 

The Buddha's path, properly comprehended, is the abandonment of craving &amp; letting go. This is similar to what KM was attempting to teach but, unlike KM, the Buddha comprehended there is actually a path (patipada) or method (gamini).