Why is "I have no self" a wrong view? In the Sabbasava Sutta (MN2), the view that "I have no self" is listed as one of the six wrong views and one who holds this view will not be freed from suffering.

Questions:


Why is "I have no self" a wrong view?
Why is this not a contradiction to anatta?



  "As he attends inappropriately in this way, one of six kinds of view
  arises in him: The view I have a self arises in him as true &amp;
  established, or the view I have no self... or the view It is
  precisely by means of self that I perceive self... or the view It is
  precisely by means of self that I perceive not-self... or the view
  It is precisely by means of not-self that I perceive self arises in him as true &amp; established, or else he has a view like this: This very
  self of mine — the knower that is sensitive here &amp; there to the
  ripening of good &amp; bad actions — is the self of mine that is constant,
  everlasting, eternal, not subject to change, and will stay just as it
  is for eternity. This is called a thicket of views, a wilderness of
  views, a contortion of views, a writhing of views, a fetter of views.
  Bound by a fetter of views, the uninstructed run-of-the-mill person is
  not freed from birth, aging, &amp; death, from sorrow, lamentation, pain,
  distress, &amp; despair. He is not freed, I tell you, from suffering &amp;
  stress.
It is wrong view because of the "I" (bolded): "I have no self". This view still believes in self. It thinks: "myself has no self". This is the wrong view of the befuddled wanderer Vacchagotta in SN 44.10.

This wrong view is similar to the nihilistic view in MN 102, where it states:


  Just as a dog bound by a leash tied to a post or pillar keeps running and circling around that same post or pillar; so too those through
  fear of identity &amp; disgust with identity keep running and circling
  around that same identity.
  
  


Right view is: "The five aggregates have no self".