Bad conduct leads to richness? Some people, althought saying that following the Buddhas teaching, but maybe do not have much trust or understandig into cause and effect, kamma, saying that richness and success comes from no fear to do evil.

If that is the case, why are not all people who have no virtues, no Sila, rich, following their arguments pattern?

Isn't it not merely because still having some merits that the downfall does not arises accurate, if one conducts wrong, thinking it will not fall to me?

What's the effect of Sila, virtue, on wealth and success?

(Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, entertainment but for release from this wheel)
It is a contradiction to say generosity is a virtue when there also exists delight in material wealth. 

The teachings in Buddhism about generosity leading to wealth are fake dhamma. 

The suttas properly say (somewhere) the supreme generosity is merely for the purpose of beautifying the mind. 

Generosity is practised for the sake of giving up selfishness &amp; self. Generosity is not practising for the sake of material reward. 

The poor peasants in Cambodia who give to monks will never have material wealth. 

Material wealth is acquired by those who have the disposition for making money. 

No amount of generosity will give an incapable person the ability of making money on the stock market or start a large corporation, for example. 

The greatest wealth in the world is acquired by evil means. 

Yes - bad conduct leads to material wealth. 

The suttas themselves say wealth can be acquired via evil means. 


  These ten pleasure seekers are found in the world.
  
  What ten?
  
  First, a pleasure seeker seeks wealth using illegitimate, coercive
  means. They don’t make themselves happy and pleased, nor share it and
  make merit.
  
  Next, a pleasure seeker seeks wealth using illegitimate, coercive
  means. They make themselves happy and pleased, but don’t share it and make merit.
  
  AN 10.91