Is there a significant difference between the jet blast from Airbus and Boeing? I am looking up for jet blast data and there are not much information in the net.

One of the main references I can found are the Airport Planning of each aircraft.
From these can be obtained that the jet blast contours from Boeing's aircraft are quite longer than the Airbus's ones at idle and breakaway conditions (the double in length of the jet blast print).

According to this, simulations carried out using specific software (AeroTurn, in this case) show that the jet blast affected area by a breakaway run of a B737-800, for example, would affect stands in a 100 m backwards zone, which is far from the truth.

Some researches can be find Googling a little, but they show comparison between simulations and experimental jet blast data from a JFK test campaign, besides the own JFK data.

Could anyone confirm if the difference is real? A mapping study, an experimental analysis or other similar evidence would be useful.

Thank you everyone for your help, and thanks for all your work in the community.
Probably not.

Airbus and Boeing aircraft may even have the same model of the engine. For instance,  2.4 m diameter Pratt &amp; Whitney PW4000 is used on Airbus A310-300, A300-600 and also Boeing 747-400, 767-200/300. General Electric CF6-50 is used on both Airbus A300 and Boeing 747. 

I would expect much more differences between jet blast from of Airbus A380 versus Airbus A220. A220 is near ten times lighter (575 vs 60 t).