Descend via STAR, after getting crossing restriction previously The ATC issues &quot;Cross BHAWK at FL240&quot; initially. After few minutes, the ATC instructs &quot;Descend Via FYTTE5 arrival&quot;. Should we comply with the crossing restriction at BHAWK, or the restriction can be omitted?
The JO 7110.65Y says

Clearance to “descent via” authorizes pilots:

To descend at pilot discretion to meet published restrictions on a STAR.


and

“Climb via SID except after Baret, maintain flight level one niner
zero.”
NOTE1. Considering the principle that the last ATC clearance issued
has precedence over the previous, the phraseology “maintain
(altitude)” alone cancels previously issued altitude restrictions,
including SID/STAR altitude restrictions unless they are restated or
modified, and authorizes an unrestricted climb or descent. Speed
restrictions remain in effect unless the controller explicitly cancels
the speed restrictions.

However, the example given in &quot;descend via&quot; does not say anything about &quot;previous assigned crossing altitude.&quot; And the note given in &quot;climb via&quot; example only explains the phraseology &quot;maintain&quot; would cancel previously issued altitude.
Is there any FAA document stating the altitude restrictions assigned previously can be omitted or still valid, after getting &quot;descend via&quot; clearance?
The restriction to cross &quot;BHAWK at FL240&quot; is overridden by the controllers latest clearance to &quot;Descend Via FYTTE5 arrival&quot;, unless they  include the instruction  descend via &quot;EXCEPT MAINTAIN FL240&quot;.
FAA Climb Via/Descend Via Speed Clearances Frequently Asked Questions, page 6, questions 8.
If unsure, you should query ATC though.