Can somebody pitch me on the economic argument against capitalism and globalism? Resistance to "Globalism", free trade &amp; capitalism etc seems to be what distinguishes many of the "left wing" authoritarians in this camp. But the specifics are always extremely vague. I've heard talk about how accepting a permanently retarded economy is an acceptable cost, but it's hard to rationalize what (over a decade or two) would eventually result in a decline in international status as acceptable. 

Why should I support an anti-globalist agenda? A "national socialist" one? Or of that ilk. Since the utmost principle around here is *the health of the state* as opposed to the people, does it not follow that a trade off is inevitable? This camp does not appear very open to human capital development in it's principles