Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
He spent last season in charge of the Under-20 development squad, but will not return for the start of pre-season training. Rangers manager NAME_1 wants to alter the coaching personnel, leaving NAME_2 without a position at Ibrox. He spent 14 years as a player at Rangers, before returning as a coach in 2005. NAME_2 held several positions in the youth set-up, then stepped up to work with the first team during NAME_3 NAME_4's second spell as manager in 2007. He was first-team coach when NAME_5 succeeded NAME_4 in 2011, then returned to working with the youths again after NAME_6 resigned during season 2014-15.

Summary:
1. Former Rangers defender NAME_7 will not return to the club's youth set - up next season.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.