Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.
A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Document: The Swans have rejected £40m offers from NAME_1 and Leicester City for the Iceland midfielder, who they value at £50m. NAME_2 missed NAME_3' 2-0 friendly win over Birmingham on Saturday because of the transfer speculation. "It's not something that we want [or] will be allowing to drag on until the deadline," said NAME_4. "The deadline I want it to be is imminently for everyone involved at NAME_3 and NAME_5 included. I'm not going to put an actual day on it, but imminently means in the very near future." If NAME_1 improve their offer for NAME_2, a new bid could include Toffees defender NAME_6. The 19-year-old full-back had a spell on loan at Wigan Athletic last season and was a part of the England team which won this summer's Under-20 World Cup. NAME_2 did not travel with NAME_3 for their tour of the United States with his omission from the

Summary: 1. NAME_4 confirmed that "all parties" are still talking about the potential transfer, but it is understood NAME_1 have not improved on their initial offer, believed to be 2.

Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer: