I was looking on Mi Yodeya for questions related wearing costumes on Purim and came across "[Are Sephardic Jews allowed to dress up in costumes on Purim?](https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/26286/are-sephardic-jews-allowed-to-dress-up-in-costumes-on-purim)". 

I was excited to find a Rama (OC 696:8) quoted and upon clicking it was shown: 

[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/68gYi.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/68gYi.png) 

Since it was a bit difficult to read, I then went to [Sefaria](https://www.sefaria.org/texts) and searched for the same and was given:

[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/dhalx.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/dhalx.png)

Personally, #2 is easier for me to read and I think is more accessible. 

**My question**:

Is there/ what is the policy re: updating a source quoted on an old answer or question? 

Essentially should we go by what we feel could be easier to read/ access, and utilize new resources that didn't exist when the question was originally asked **OR** should we say, no leave as be- perhaps the author wanted *davka* that source to be used- be it since it has *tzuras hadaf*(form of the page) or other rishonim on it etc