Has any marxists/neo-marxists responded to Karl Poppers claim that marxism is a quasi-science? If so in what way? To my understanding Poppers claim is mostly about the idea of history as a teleological process towards the overthrow of the bourgeois by the proletariat and ending in his idea of communism. What effects does this claim have upon other ideas grounded in marxism such as Critical Theory, ideaology and critique of society?

(This question is inspired by an exam I am working on, ***but is not really related to the assignment. I'm not looking for any help on my exam here just curious***. The exam is about scientific progress in the view of the Problem of Induction, Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn and Critical Theroy in the exam)