Been a fence of ILI or LII for her for a while as I was watching her videos, but most likely LII. That shows up more when it comes to her videos on atheism usually, as she tries to go more for the ideas other side presents than the person, and she really doesn't give as much PoLR Fe vibe? Probably a more well rounded LII when it comes to social norms than usual type descriptions, but her insecurity over knowing what really is moral or not often shows up in "I do see your point too, so I don't really want to be so harsh.../I don't claim to have a moral authority on this subject, but that just doesn't sound right to me?" vibe unless it is something like child abuse, something she feels fairly strongly about and certain that it is something she morally opposes completely.
Last edited by ApeironStella; 03-14-2019 at 01:14 PM.
While I don't know what her type is, any reasonable person would attack the idea rather than the person. To do otherwise would be to commit an ad hominem fallacy which does nothing to support your own argument. If you're trying to come across as credible, such a fallacy is a no-no. That doesn't help to determine whether she's an ILI or an LII. I do agree that I don't see Fe PoLR. Based on the few clips I've seen, I don't suspect INTx at all; but I've only seen a few clips.
I think she is SEI, but I can't rule out LII for her.
Also, I hope this first post helps to confirm that my account isn't controlled by a spambot.