If you pose the question, you'd might want to state your opinion along with the link.
My opinion is yet completely unformed, but there is good and bad to this. Getting the one-and-dones out of college basketball is probably a good thing, and while it won't end corruption in college basketball, it may reduce it.
Some players don't want to be in college or don't have the aptitude for it. They should have other options.
On the other hand, a G League player not under a direct NBA two-way contract makes (last time I checked) between around $25,000 and $35,000 a year. A D-I college scholarship is worth between $25,000 and $50,000 a year, plus hookers, strippers and any other money (cars or houses) slipped under the table by boosters, agents and the like.
This has received some national buzz.
Also, shall we reflect on the police blotter that's beginning to form around college basketball? That whole scene is helping make this possible.
To see high school players play? Against actual grown men?
Here we go. The G-League is theoretically flashing the cash. They're willing to drop 12 and a half ABA franchises on post-HS players to help ditch the one-and-done rule.
This begs the question of whether it's taking a pay cut if you otherwise take the college route. It seems like, however, with the latest scandal currently burning up the courtrooms, it might be a solution to what people may not regard as a problem, but probably is.
If you leave high school to play professional basketball, you are, essentially, a high school player playing in a league of, wait for it, professionals. High school senior, college freshman, virtually no difference.
There are very few Kevin Garnetts in life. With good reason.
If you want to tell me that people who, heretofore, have said, "Meh, the G-League, it's a bunch of guys who aren't good enough for the NBA, not gonna watch," will say, "Oh, unless you put a bunch of 18 year olds in there, then I'm TOTALLY down with it," I will call bull****.