Perhaps this could be kept to the top that Mr Ketchum brought.
comparing idea is undesirable from the point of view of voters.
>> I was thinking of my repair to that Fluffy example.
>> Condorcet finds the wrong number of winners sometimes.
>> Condorcet is able to be seen as already rejected.
>I do not understand these statements.
>winner, with the exception of an occasional tie.
>     If Condorcet really fails, I am all ears.
>> That could be similar to expecting monotonicity to be held.
>>  >intelligently among such a crowd, regardless of method of counting votes?
>> some problem with that (nonexistence?).
>more than half declare each of A and C less acceptable.
that will be right to do is to reject comments like "I like B winning".
>Why am I supposed to care about First Past the Post, considering the above?
the candidate voted for would lead to. Were you unaware of that?.