The average improvements of the verbal discrimination variables expressed in percentage are 4.23% for the URV, a 9.04% for the kd, a 17.87% for the Dmax, and 4.32%, 10.05%, 13.04% for the binaural URV, Kd and Dmax respectively. From our results, it can be deduced that the auditory training with wide-band white noise improves the verbal discrimination measures.
Auditory training with wide-band white noise: effects on the verbal discrimination
 
  Key words:
 
 
  
   Auditory training
  
 
Abstract
The auditory training with wide-band white noise is a methodology for the qualitative recovery of the <dis>hearing loss</dis> in people suffering from <dis>sensorineural hearing loss</dis>.
It is based on the application of a wide-band white modified noise.
In a prospective study, we have assessed the modifications of the verbal reception threshold URV), the maximum discrimination (Dmax), and the discrimination coefficient (Kd) in a sample of 48 patients, who have followed a program of 15 auditory training with wide- band white noise sessions.
The average improvements of the verbal discrimination variables expressed in percentage are 4.23% for the URV, a 9.04% for the kd, a 17.87% for the Dmax, and 4.32%, 10.05%, 13.04% for the binaural URV, Kd and Dmax respectively.
From our results, it can be deduced that the auditory training with wide-band white noise improves the verbal discrimination measures.
Not only it allows to reach the verbal reception threshold at a lower intensity, but also it moves the discrimination line towards the left.
Furthermore, it increases the maximum discrimination both in binaural measurements and in those which consider all the ears.
Abstract
The auditory training with wide-band white noise is a methodology for the qualitative recovery of the hearing loss in people suffering from sensorineural hearing loss.
It is based on the application of a wide-band white modified noise.
In a prospective study, we have assessed the modifications of the verbal reception threshold URV), the maximum discrimination (Dmax), and the discrimination coefficient (Kd) in a sample of 48 patients, who have followed a program of 15 auditory training with wide- band white noise sessions.
The average improvements of the verbal discrimination variables expressed in percentage are 4.23% for the URV, a 9.04% for the kd, a 17.87% for the Dmax, and 4.32%, 10.05%, 13.04% for the binaural URV, Kd and Dmax respectively.
From our results, it can be deduced that the auditory training with wide-band white noise improves the verbal discrimination measures.
Not only it allows to reach the verbal reception threshold at a lower intensity, but also it moves the discrimination line towards the left.
Furthermore, it increases the maximum discrimination both in binaural measurements and in those which consider all the ears.
The average improvements of the verbal discrimination variables expressed in percentage are 4.23% for the URV, a 9.04% for the kd, a 17.87% for the Dmax, and 4.32%, 10.05%, 13.04% for the binaural URV, Kd and Dmax respectively. From our results, it can be deduced that the auditory training with wide-band white noise improves the verbal discrimination measures.