Three groups of motor fibers were distinguished according to their differential terminal distribution: (1) The corticospinal and corticobulbar tracts, which project to all levels of the spinal cord and brainstem, terminating diffusely throughout the nucleus proprius of the dorsal horn and the intermediate zone. A portion of these connect directly with the large motor neurons that innervate the muscles of the fingers, face, and tongue; this system provides the capacity for a high degree of fractionation of movements, as exemplified by independent finger movements. As alluded to above, a large fraction of the fibers in the corticospinal tracts originate from the sensory cortex and appear to function in the modulation of movement by afferent neurons. (2) A ventromedial pathway, which arises in the tectum (tectospinal tract), vestibular nuclei (vestibulospinal tract), and pontine and medullary reticular cells (reticulospinal tract) and terminates principally on the internuncial cells of the ventromedial part of the spinal gray matter. This system is mainly concerned with axial movements—the maintenance of posture, integrated movements of body and limbs, and total limb movements. (3) A lateral pathway, which is derived mainly from the magnocellular part of the red nucleus and terminates in the dorsal and lateral parts of the internuncial zone. This pathway adds to the capacity for independent use of the extremities, especially of the hands.
Reference has already been made to the corticomesencephalic, corticopontine, and corticomedullary fiber systems that project onto the reticulospinal, vestibulospinal, rubrospinal, and tectospinal nuclei. These control stability of the head (via labyrinthine reflexes) and of the neck and body in relation to the head (tonic neck reflexes) as well as postures of the body in relation to limb movements. Lesions in these systems are less well understood than those of the corticospinal system. They cause no paralysis of muscles but result in the liberation of unusual postures (e.g., hemiplegic dystonia), heightened tonic neck and labyrinthine reflexes, and decerebrate rigidity. In a strict sense these are all “extrapyramidal,” as discussed in the next two chapters.
Paralysis Caused by Lesions of the Upper Motor Neurons
The corticospinal pathway may be interrupted by a lesion at any point along its course—at the level of the cerebral cortex, subcortical white matter, internal capsule, brainstem, or spinal cord. Usually, when hemiplegia is severe and permanent as a consequence of disease, much more than the long, direct corticospinal pathway is involved. In the cerebral white matter (corona radiata) and internal capsule, the corticospinal fibers are intermingled with corticostriate, corticothalamic, corticorubral, corticopontine, cortico-olivary, and corticoreticular fibers. It is noteworthy that thalamocortical fibers, which are a vital link in an ascending fiber system from the basal ganglia and cerebellum, also pass through the internal capsule and cerebral white matter. Thus lesions in these parts can simultaneously affect both corticospinal and extrapyramidal systems. Attribution of a capsular hemiplegia solely to a lesion of the corticospinal or pyramidal pathway is therefore not entirely correct. The term upper motor neuron (supranuclear) paralysis, which recognizes the involvement of several descending fiber systems that influence and modify the lower motor neuron, is more appropriate.
In primates, lesions limited to area 4 of Brodmann, the motor cortex, cause mainly hypotonia and weakness of the distal limb muscles. Lesions of the premotor cortex (area 6) result in weakness, spasticity, and increased stretch reflexes (Fulton). Lesions of the supplementary motor cortex lead to involuntary grasping. Resection of cortical areas 4 and 6 and subcortical white matter in monkeys causes complete and permanent paralysis and spasticity (Laplane et al). These clinical effects have not been as clearly defined in humans.