An increasing experience with lumbar back pain and sciatica has impressed the authors with the large number of such cases that have no clear cause. At one time all these cases were classified as sciatic neuritis or “sacroiliac strain.” After Mixter and Barr popularized the concept of prolapsed disc, all sciatica and lumbar pains were ascribed to this condition. Operations became widely practiced, not only for frank disc protrusion but also for “hard discs” (unruptured) and related pathologies of the spine. In large referral centers the surgical results became decreasingly satisfactory until recently, as many patients were being seen with unrelieved postlaminectomy pain as with unoperated ruptured discs.
To explain these cases of chronic sciatic pain, a number of pathologic entities have been described. Entrapment of lumbar roots may be the consequence not only of disc rupture but also of spondylotic spurs with stenosis of the lateral recess, cysts of the synovium derived from degenerative disease of the facet joint, hypertrophy of facets, and, rarely, arachnoiditis. Lateral recess stenosis in particular may be a cause of sciatica not relieved by disc surgery (see later, under “Lumbar Stenosis”). Synovial cysts arising from a facet joint are not uncommon, and even very small ones may be situated in the proximal portion of the foramen, thereby causing sciatica. If pain is intractable, surgical removal of the cyst is indicated. Another surprising finding in the course of imaging the spinal canal is a cyst-like dilatation of the perineural sheath (Tarlov cysts). One or more sacral roots may be involved at points where they penetrate the dura and may be associated with radicular symptoms. There are reports of relief from opening the cysts and freeing the roots, but the results seem more uncertain to us. Sciatica that is temporally linked to the premenstrual period is almost always a result of endometriosis involving the nerve at the sciatic notch (“catamenial sciatica”). We have also observed cases of sciatica that occurred with each pregnancy, presumably from uterine traction on the nerve.
Over the years the notion of a piriformis syndrome, so named by Kopell and Thompson, has arisen as a cause of otherwise unexplained buttock pain or vague sciatica. The muscle overlies or, in a small proportion, embeds the peroneal trunk of the sciatic nerve. Hypertrophy, spasm, or simply the anatomic variation in which the nerve is entrapped in the tendinous origin of the muscle, have all putatively caused local and some degree of sciatic pain. Pain in these cases is ostensibly elicited by stretching the muscle through flexion, adduction, and internal rotation of the hip. The validity of this syndrome is uncertain and it has been the subject of polemical discussions in the literature. EMG data are ambiguous but reportedly show distal denervation, sparing more proximally innervated muscles. Our practice would be to avoid surgery in such cases, but to endorse physical therapy, which may include injection of botulinum toxin or corticosteroids into the muscle.
Compression of the cauda equina by epidural tumor, as described further on, most often begins with back pain or sciatica, as a result of deposits of prostatic or breast cancer or myeloma. The sciatic nerve or the plexus from which it originates may be implicated in tumor growths (lymphoma, neurofibrosarcoma). Several inflammatory diseases of the cauda equina produce back pain and bilateral sciatica and may be mistaken for the more usual types of cauda equina compression; cytomegalovirus infection in AIDS patients, Lyme disease (Bannwarth syndrome), herpetic infection, and neoplastic meningitis at times behave in this fashion. In all of these, the CSF shows a pleocytosis. The Guillain-Barré syndrome may also produce misleading back and radicular pain before weakness is apparent. The caudal roots in these diseases usually enhance with gadolinium on MRI.