Bandy LC, Clarke-Pearson DL, Silverman PM, et al. Computed tomography in evaluation of extrapelvic lymphadenopathy in carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1986;65:73–76.
19.
Hacker NF, Berek JS. Surgical staging. In: Surwit E, Alberts D, eds. Cervix cancer. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987:43–57.
20.
Heller PB, Malfetano JH, Bundy BN. Clinical pathologic study of stages IIB, III, and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: extended diagnostic study for paraaortic metastasis (a GOG study). Gynecol Oncol 1990;38:425.
21.
Worthington JL, Balfe DM, Lee JK, et al. Uterine neoplasms: MR imaging. Radiology 1986;159:725–730.
22.
Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, et al. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1997;278:1096.
23.
Bipat S, Glas AS, Velden J, et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:59.
24.
Rose RG. Stage IIB-IVA cancer of the cervix. Cancer J 2003;9: 404.
25.
Lin WC, Hung YC, YEH LS, et al. Usefulness of (18)Fﬂuorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect paraaortic lymph node metastasis in advanced cervical cancer with negative computed tomography findings. Gynecol Oncol 2003;89:73.
26.
Park SY, Roh JW, Park YJ, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) for evaluating para-aortic and pelvic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer before surgical staging: a surgico-pathologic study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003;22:456.
27.
Cosin JA, Fowler JM, Chen MD, et al. Pretreatment surgical staging of patients with cervical carcinoma: the case for lymph node debulking. Cancer 1998;82:2241–2248.
28.
Robert ME, Fu YS. Squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a review with emphasis on prognostic factors and unusual variants. Semin Diagn Pathol 1990;7:173–189.
29.
Kjorstad KE. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1977;5:219–223.
30.
Berek JS, Hacker NF, Fu YS, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: histologic variables associated with lymph node metastasis and survival. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:46–52.
31.
Hopkins MP, Morley GW. A comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:912– 917.
32.
Fu YS, Berek JS, Hilborne LH. Diagnostic problems of cervical in situ and invasive adenocarcinoma. Appl Pathol 1987;5:47–56.
33.