Normal muscle is endowed with a population of embryonic muscle precursor cells, known as satellite cells, and, as a result, it possesses a remarkable capacity to regenerate, a point often forgotten. It has been estimated that enough new muscle can be generated from a piece of normal muscle the size of a pencil eraser to provide normal musculature for a 70-kg adult. However, with complete destruction of the muscle fiber, this regenerative capacity is greatly impaired. Inflammatory and metabolic destructive processes are usually followed by fairly complete restoration of the muscle cells, provided that some part of each fiber has survived and the endomysial sheaths of connective tissue have not been severely disrupted. Unfortunately, many pathologic processes of muscle are chronic and unrelenting. Under such conditions, any regenerative activity fails to keep pace with the disease and the loss of muscle fibers becomes permanent. The bulk of the muscle is then replaced by fat and collagenous connective tissue, typical, for example, of the muscular dystrophies.
THE DEVELOPMENT AND AGING OF MUSCLE (SEE ALSO CHAP. 28)
The accepted view of the embryogenesis of muscle is that muscle fibers form by fusion of myoblasts soon after the latter differentiate from somatic mesodermal cells. Muscle connective tissue derives from the somatopleural mesoderm. After fusion of the myoblasts, a series of cellular events including the sequential activation of myogenic transcription factors leads to myofibril formation. The newly formed fibers are thin, centrally nucleated tubes (appropriately called myotubes) in which myofilaments begin to be produced from polyribosomes. As myofilaments become organized into myofibrils, the nuclei of the muscle fiber are displaced peripherally to a subsarcolemmal position. Once the nuclei assume a peripheral position, the myofiber is fully formed. The detailed mechanisms whereby myoblasts seek one another, the manner in which each of a series of fused nuclei contributes to the myotube, the formation of actin and myosin fibrils, Z-discs, and the differentiation of a small residue of satellite cells on the surface of the fibers are reviewed by Rubenstein and Kelly.
The mechanisms that determine the number and arrangement of fibers in each muscle are not as well understood. Presumably, the myoblasts themselves possess the genetic information that controls the program of development, but within any given species there are wide individual variations that account for obvious differences in the size of muscles and their power of contraction.
The number of fibers assigned to each muscle is probably attained by birth, and growth of muscle thereafter depends mainly on the enlargement of fibers. Although the nervous system and musculature develop independently, muscle fibers continue to grow after birth only when they are active and under the influence of nerve. Measurements of muscle fiber diameters from birth to old age show the growth curve ascending rapidly in the early postnatal years and less rapidly in adolescence, reaching a peak during the third decade. After puberty, growth of muscle is less in females than in males, and such differences are greater in the arm, shoulder, and pelvic muscles than in the leg; growth in ocular muscles is about equal in the 2 sexes. At all ages, disuse of muscle decreases fiber size by as much as 30 percent, and overuse increases the size by about the same amount (work hypertrophy). Normally, type 1 (oxidative enzyme-rich) fibers are slightly smaller than type 2 (phosphorylative enzyme-rich) fibers; the numerical proportions of the 2 fiber types vary in different muscles in accordance with the natural functions of that muscle. The exercising of young animal muscle causes a hypertrophy of high-oxidative type 1 fibers and an increase in the proportion of low-oxidative type 2 fibers; aging muscle lacks this capacity; exercise produces only an increase in the proportion of type 2 fibers (Silbermann et al). No such data are available in humans, but clinical observation suggests that with aging, the capacity of muscle to respond to intense, sustained exercise is diminished.