 Bitcoin Runes records 15.6M NFT transactions in 4 months 
2024-08-26

Bitcoin Runes, a protocol for non-fungible tokens launched in April, generated $162.4 million in fees over 15.6 million transactions in four months.
According to Dune Analytics, Runes recorded the majority of transactions in the first two months, often exceeding 300,000 transactions per day. On April 23 alone, NFT investors racked up more than one million transactions in minting, etching, transfers and edicts combined, representing 81.3% of the total Bitcoin network bandwidth. Cointelegraph
In contrast, daily Runes transactions declined in the last two months, logging roughly 50,000 daily transactions on average. 
The Runes protocol initially dominated daily transactions post-launch but is now seeing a decline, with Bitcoin reclaiming its network dominance. 
Since July 16, Bitcoin BTCUSD has consistently accounted for roughly 90% of the network activity, while the remaining 10% is shared among Ordinals, BRC-20 tokens and Runes. 
The rise of Bitcoin inscriptions
The Runes protocol was introduced as an efficient successor to Bitcoin Ordinals and a competitor to BRC-20 and has gained preference against both from many investors. 
In the last four months, Runes exceeded BRC-20 in terms of daily transaction share on most days. BRC-20 outperformed Runes only on 13 days, as shown in the chart below.
Cointelegraph
Out of the 15.6 million Runes transactions, mints represent more than nine million transactions, while edicts and etching account for 6.5 million and 91,500 transactions, respectively.Cointelegraph
Check out Cointelegraph’s guide to learn more about Bitcoin Runes.
The market opportunity for Bitcoin Runes
Pseudonymous decentralized finance researcher Ignas recently stated that the real market opportunity for Runes might come after a few months of its launch. He said:
Bitcoin layer-2 network Stacks is also preparing to launch a trading solution for Runes, BRC-20s and Ordinals inscriptions.
Magazine: Dorsey’s ‘marketplace of algorithms’ could fix social media… so why hasn’t it?