Rachel Reeves's CV exaggerated time at Bank of England
2025-02-13
Category: economic

Rachel Reeves's online CV exaggerates how long she spent working at the Bank of England.The Chancellor left the financial institution nine months earlier than she states in her LinkedIn profile. This means she spent five and a half years working at the bank - including nearly a year studying - despite publicly claiming to have spent a decade there.On the professional networking site LinkedIn, the Chancellor's profile claims she worked at the Bank of England from September 2000 to December 2006.However, BBC News has established she had left by March 2006 when she began working for Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) in West Yorkshire.
A photo taken in March 2006 shows her with other HBOS staff at the Council of Mortgage Lenders annual lunch. A former HR lead for the bank who helped with Reeves's relocation also said she could recall her first day and it was in March 2006.A spokesman for Reeves confirmed that dates on her LinkedIn were inaccurate and said it was due to an administrative error by the team. They said the Chancellor hadn't seen it before it was published.The Chancellor has cited her time as an economist at the Bank of England as part of the reason she can be trusted with the nation's finances and has repeatedly claimed to have spent up to 10 years there.
In a 2021 magazine interview, which she subsequently posted on X, she said: "I spent a decade working as an economist at the Bank of England and loved it."In a speech to the Labour Party Business Conference in February last year, Reeves said: "I spent the best part of a decade as an economist at the Bank of England." She said the same thing in a speech at a CEO summit in July 2022, and in a video posted on her Facebook page in the same month.The claim was also repeated in a Labour party document last year which stated that she spent "most of the first decade of her career at the Bank of England".As she had already started at HBOS by the spring of 2006, her time at the central bank only amounted to five and half years. This included nearly a year studying for a Masters at the London School of Economics (LSE).Last year, during previous controversy about Reeves's CV, the Bank of England confirmed that Reeves had left in 2006 but refused to give the month of her departure saying it was a detailed staff record which they couldn't provide.Reeves also stood for election in Bromley in south-east London more than three months after she had taken a job in West Yorkshire.She stood in a by-election on 29 June 2006 but had taken up a role at HBOS in March that year and received a relocation package to move from London. It is understood she rented a flat in Leeds and kept a flat in London at this time.The Chancellor's online CV gives incorrect dates for her time at HBOS as well, which her team also acknowledged. It states that she left in December 2009, five months before she was elected to parliament in May 2010.In fact, we have established, her employment at HBOS finished in mid-May 2009, when she signed a compromise agreement. An invoice for legal advice on the agreement stated that it arose "from a decision by your employer to terminate your employment".The bank was undergoing restructuring at the time of Reeves's departure and a spokesman for the Chancellor said she had taken voluntary redundancy.A compromise agreement, now known as a settlement agreement, is a legal document between an employer and employee which HBOS used when senior managers were made redundant.
Reeves was allowed to continue using a company car for six months, according to her spokesman.She then spent a year campaigning ahead of the May 2010 general election without seeking further employment.The MP for Leeds West and Pudsey has previously faced accusations that she has embellished her online CV.Her LinkedIn profile was changed last year to describe her role at HBOS as "Retail Banking".It had previously claimed she worked as an economist at the bank but she instead held a management role in the bank's Customer Relations department, which dealt with complaints.In November, several MPs raised the row in the House of Commons while putting questions to Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner.The prime minister's spokeswoman also faced questions at that time, with journalists asking if Sir Keir expected members of his Cabinet to tell the truth on their CV.The spokeswoman said the row related to "the chancellor's time before she was the chancellor"."The prime minister is very clear that what is most important is having a chancellor who is able to balance the books and who is able to be straight with the public and restore the public finances," she added.
