Second, judges and courts can learn lessons from the experience of police departments that can be applied to the court setting. The articles and presentations below highlight how procedural justice can increase adherence to the law. New research on procedural fairness in policing can be found in our Quarterly Research Report.
http://www.proceduralfairness.org/Policing.aspx
The idea of the outcomes model of procedural justice is that the fairness of process depends on the procedure producing correct outcomes. For example, if the procedure is a criminal trial, then the correct outcome would be conviction of the guilty and exonerating the innocent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_justice
The procedural justice theory of police legitimacy has yet to fully consider the potential impacts of legal cynicism. The present study tests the hypothesis that cynicism mediates the justice–legitimacy relationship.
http://www.proceduralfairness.org/Policing.aspx
Symposiums, presentations, articles and discussions relevant to examining explicit and implicit biases in the law, procedural justice, police legitimacy and perceptions of justice in the legal system.
https://www.post.ca.gov/procedural-justice-and-police-legitimacy-resources.aspx
Distributive | Procedural | Restorative | Retributive | So what? There are four types of justice that people can seek when they have been wronged. Distributive justice, also known as economic justice, is about fairness in what people receive, from goods to attention. Its roots are in social order and it is at the roots of socialism, where equality is a fundamental principle.
http://changingminds.org/explanations/trust/four_justice.htm
Procedural justice concerns the fairness and the transparency of the processes by which decisions are made, and may be contrasted with distributive justice (fairness in the distribution of rights or resources), and retributive justice (fairness in the punishment of wrongs).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_justice
In recent years research has made significant strides in understanding the manner in which procedural fairness practices can enhance the work of police forces by raising compliance levels. Numerous police forces have implemented procedural fairness based policies and practices.
http://www.proceduralfairness.org/Policing.aspx
(Learn how and when to remove this template message) Procedural justice is the idea of fairness in the processes that resolve disputes and allocate resources. One aspect of procedural justice is related to discussions of the administration of justice and legal proceedings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_justice
The principle of fairness is also found in the idea of fair play (as opposed to the fair share of distributive justice). If people believe that a fair process was used in deciding what it to be distributed, then they may well accept an imbalance in what they receive in comparison to others. If they see both procedural and distributive injustice, they will likely seek restorative and/or retributive justice.
http://changingminds.org/explanations/trust/four_justice.htm
Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy Resources. Many resources describing procedural justice and police legitimacy, and their convergence, have been produced in both the academic and law enforcement communities. Resources demonstrating the approaches described above are available for review in many different formats:
https://www.post.ca.gov/procedural-justice-and-police-legitimacy-resources.aspx
procedural justice definition
Procedural justice is the idea of fairness in the processes that resolve disputes and allocate resources.