The Role of the Military Regime in Latin American Countries. Guillermo O’Donnell had used the term ‘Bureaucratic- Authoritarianism’ to describe the military regimes of Argentina and Brazil but scholars soon began using it to explain the behaviour and policies of other military regimes too.
http://www.shareyouressays.com/94963/the-role-of-the-military-regime-in-latin-american-countries
Military dictatorship of Chile (1973–90) The military dictatorship of Chile (Spanish: dictadura militar de Chile) was an authoritarian military government that ruled Chile between 1973 and 1990. The dictatorship was established after the democratically elected socialist government of Salvador Allende was overthrown by a CIA-backed coup d'état on 11 September 1973.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinochet_regime
S TAT I / A R T I C L E S Personalism: A type or characteristic of authoritarian regimes? Jeroen Van den Bosch* Abstract / his paper takes a closer look at those authoritarian political regimes with a leader holding absolute power referred to as either ‘personalist’ or ‘neo-patrimonial regimes.
http://www.academia.edu/6202099/Personalism_A_type_or_characteristic_of_authoritarian_regimes
Note that the low amount of observations for military no-party regimes (N=25, only 3 countries) does not allow for any robust conclusions. he low number of observations for rebel regimes, however, is not due to their low number of countries (7 regimes in 7 coun- tries), but to their short average lifespan.
http://www.academia.edu/6202099/Personalism_A_type_or_characteristic_of_authoritarian_regimes
Daron Acemoglu, Davide Ticchi, Andrea Vindigni. We investigate how nondemocratic regimes use the military and how this can lead to the emergence of military dictatorships.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w13915
Finally the author will assess what are the advantages and disadvantages of treating personalism as a type or characteristic. 12 | STATI / ARTICLES Aspects and dynamics of personal rule Below, the author will describe the behavior and internal operation of those regimes that have turned personalist.
http://www.academia.edu/6202099/Personalism_A_type_or_characteristic_of_authoritarian_regimes
a country, government, or the form of government in which absolute power is exercised by a dictator. 2. absolute, imperious, or overbearing power or control. 3. the office or position held by a dictator. Origin of dictatorship.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dictatorship
Military government. Military government, administration of occupied territory by an occupying power, including the exercise of executive, legislative, and judicial authority. In international law, territory is considered occupied when it is actually under the authority of hostile armed forces. The necessity for military government arises from the failure or inability of the legitimate government to exercise its functions.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/military-government
A military dictatorship is a type of government where there military holds political power. There is no attention to public opinion or individual rights, i.e. if someone where to disagree with the military they'd be arrested and probably killed. Example of a military dictatorship:
http://www.answers.com/Q/Define_military_dictatorship
In the 1960s, political scientists were concerned with the world­wide spread of authoritarianism. Explanations for the growth of authoritarianism had first focused on the military. While examining the nature and orientation of BA regimes, O’Donnell and others proceeded from the definition of authoritarianism.
http://www.shareyouressays.com/94963/the-role-of-the-military-regime-in-latin-american-countries
military regime definition
A military regime refers to an administration of occupied territory by an occupying power, including the exercise of executive, legislative, and judicial authority.  Military regime is the administration of occupied territory by an occupying power, including the exercise of executive, legislative, and judicial authority.  