Distinguishing between science and pseudoscience is problematic We use cookies to provide you with a better onsite experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-pseudoscience/
If not, chances are it is pseudoscience. We can demarcate science from pseudoscience less by what science is and more by what scientists do. Science is a set of methods aimed at testing hypotheses and building theories.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-pseudoscience/
The term pseudohistory is applied to works of historical revision that are based upon or derived from a theory or upon a re-interpretation or both; moreover, the related term cryptohistory applied to a pseudohistory based upon or derived from the superstitions inherent to occultism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudohistory
The boundary problem between science and pseudoscience, in fact, is notoriously fraught with definitional disagreements because the categories are too broad and fuzzy on the edges, and the term “pseudoscience” is subject to adjectival abuse against any claim one happens to dislike for any reason.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-pseudoscience/
Other common characteristics of pseudohistory are: 1  The arbitrary linking of disparate events so as to form – in the theorist's opinion – a pattern. 2  Hypothesising the consequences of unlikely events that could have happened, thereby assuming tacitly that they did. 3  Sensationalism, or shock value.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudohistory
The definition of pseudoscience is a set of beliefs, theories or practices falsely believed to be based on scientific evidence. An example of pseudoscience is the belief in numerology, the relationship between certain numbers and people and events. YourDictionary definition and usage example.
http://www.yourdictionary.com/pseudoscience
Pseudohistory is produced by the application of the research techniques of the historical method (primary sources and evidence) characteristic of legitimate history; yet, in itself, the work of pseudohistory is intellectually inconsistent with the historical record and with the common-sense understanding held in the collective memory of society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudohistory
Climate deniers are accused of practicing pseudoscience, as are intelligent design creationists, astrologers, UFOlogists, parapsychologists, practitioners of alternative medicine, and often anyone who strays far from the scientific mainstream.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-pseudoscience/
pseudoscience. 1  facts and principles systematized and presented as science, but having no true scientific basis or application. 2  any field or theory presuming without warrant to have a scientific basis or application.
http://www.yourdictionary.com/pseudoscience
Definition and etymology. The term pseudohistory was coined in the early 19th century; a usage older than the term pseudo-scholarship and earlier than pseudo-science. Similarly, in an 1815 attestation, it is used to refer to Certamen Homeri et Hesiodi, a fictional contest between two historical poets.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudohistory
define pseudoscience
The definition of pseudoscience is a set of beliefs, theories or practices falsely believed to be based on scientific evidence.