 Evaluation results  The released model `aspire-biencoder-compsci-spec` (and `aspire-biencoder-compsci-spec-full`) is compared against `allenai/specter`. `aspire-biencoder-compsci-spec-full`<sup>*</sup> is the performance reported in our paper by averaging over 3 re-runs of the model. The released models `aspire-biencoder-compsci-spec` and `aspire-biencoder-compsci-spec-full` are the single best run among the 3 re-runs.  |                                             | CSFCube aggregated |    CSFCube aggregated| |--------------------------------------------:|:---------:|:-------:| |                                             |    MAP    | NDCG%20 | |                               `specter`     |   34.23   | 53.28   | | `aspire-biencoder-compsci-spec-full`<sup>*</sup> |  37.90    | 58.16   | |             `aspire-biencoder-compsci-spec` |  37.17    | 57.91   | |        `aspire-biencoder-compsci-spec-full` |  37.67    | 59.26   |   **Alternative models:**  Besides the above models consider these alternative models also released in the Aspire paper:  [`aspire-biencoder-biomed-scib`](https://huggingface.co/allenai/aspire-biencoder-biomed-scib): If you wanted to run on biomedical papers. 