MPs attack Google's deal for 'relatively trivial' £130m back taxes 
Senior MPs have condemned Google’s deal to pay £130m in back taxes in the UK as derisory, with Labour calling for a National Audit Office investigation into the “trivial” settlement. Google said on Friday it had struck an agreement with HM Revenue and Customs to pay tax that it has owed since 2005. Significantly, the company will also now start paying tax on revenue from UK-based advertisers. Google, along with other multinationals, has used legal methods to lower its tax burden in European countries such as the UK – its biggest market outside the US – but has come under intense political pressure to change its practices.

Senior MPs have condemned Google’s deal to pay £130m in back taxes in the UK as derisory, with Labour calling for a National Audit Office investigation into the “trivial” settlement.

The search giant said on Friday it had struck an agreement with HM Revenue and Customs to pay tax that it has owed since 2005. Significantly, the company will also now start paying tax on revenue from UK-based advertisers.

Google, along with other multinationals, has used legal methods to lower its tax burden in European countries such as the UK – its biggest market outside the US – but has come under intense political pressure to change its practices.

The shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, said he would ask George Osborne for details of the deal in the Commons on Monday and criticised HMRC for letting Google pay a “relatively small amount”.

“It looks to me from all the independent analysis that this is relatively trivial in comparison with what should have been paid,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

.@johnmcdonnellMP says he's worried about Google's back taxes deal, saying it looks like "another sweetheart deal" https://t.co/MPwAiH9oox — Sky News (@SkyNews) January 23, 2016

The Conservative MP, Mark Garnier, a member of the Treasury select committee, said the agreement represented a relatively small amount of money compared with Google’s UK profits.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “They are turning over $2.6bn (£1.8bn) a year and still paying relatively small amounts of tax.”

The chancellor welcomed the deal on Saturday, calling it a “major success”.

“We’ve got Google to pay taxes and I think that is a huge step forward and addresses that perfectly legitimate public anger that large corporations have not been paying tax. I think it’s a really positive step,” he said after addressing the World Economic Forum in Davos.



“I hope to see more firms follow suit and of course I’ve introduced a diverted profits tax which will require this going forward. So I think it’s a big step forward and a victory for the government.”

Good to see #Google paying more tax on past profits. We want successful businesses in UK - but they should pay their taxes. — George Osborne (@George_Osborne) January 23, 2016



Meg Hillier, the chair of the Commons public accounts committee, will call Google and tax officials to explain the deal, which she said showed HMRC “admitting it pulled in too little tax from Google for nine out of 10 years”.

“The news that Google is paying 10 years’ back tax vindicates the public accounts committee’s vigorous pursuit of international companies that were running rings around tax officials,” the Labour MP said.

“We were shocked to learn of workarounds of the tax system that were considered normal behaviour by big corporations, but which appalled the individual taxpayer.

“HMRC now needs to assure taxpayers that it will keep up the pressure to tackle whatever the next emerging issue is in real time, rather than years later.”

Bet individual taxpayers wouldn't get off as lightly as Google on back tax. Cosy deal. Will call HMRC and Google to @CommonsPAC to explain. — MegHillierMP (@Meg_HillierMP) January 23, 2016

An HMRC spokesman said: “The successful conclusion of HMRC inquiries has secured a substantial result, which means that Google will pay the full tax due in law on profits that belong in the UK. Multinational companies must pay the tax that is due and we do not accept less.”



Lin Homer, the HMRC chief executive, said earlier this month that she was stepping down after four years following criticism of the agency’s failure to prosecute more tax evaders and answer taxpayers’ queries efficiently.

Homer was made a dame in the New Year honours list.

Margaret Hodge, the previous chair of the public accounts committee, has called Google’s tax regime “devious, calculated and, in my view, unethical”.

The Labour MP had accused companies of siphoning profits made in the UK to countries where they pay less tax, such as Ireland and Luxembourg.



Osborne announced a so-called “Google tax” in his March budget, targeting businesses that moved UK profits overseas.

The “diverted profits tax” is designed to discourage large companies from taking earnings out of the UK to avoid tax.

#Google tax bill is a victory for the action we've taken.I introduced Diverted Profits Tax.We now expect to see other firms pay their share — George Osborne (@George_Osborne) January 23, 2016

Financial secretary to the Treasury, David Gauke, said the deal showed that the government was prepared to change the law when necessary.

“The Google tax bill dates back to the middle of the last Labour government ... For Labour to complain now is at best selective amnesia and at worst shameless hypocrisy,” he said.

“The new diverted profits tax is game-changing and means big global companies will now have to pay their fair share.”



A Google spokeswoman said: “We have agreed with HMRC a new approach for our UK taxes and will pay £130m, covering taxes since 2005. We will now pay tax based on revenue from UK-based advertisers, which reflects the size and scope of our UK business.

“The way multinational companies are taxed has been debated for many years and the international tax system is changing as a result. This settlement reflects that shift and is in line with recent OECD guidance.”



Antony Walker, deputy chief executive of the industry body techUK, said: “This is a positive development and shows that by working to understand how modern digital companies operate, tax authorities are making progress in addressing difficult issues where tax regimes have not kept up with the digital economy.

“This announcement addresses historical issues going back some years and should be seen in the context of a broader international drive, led by the OECD, to bring international tax rules up to date for the digital age.”