California Bitcoin bill is shelved to allow for innovation
A Californian Bitcoin bill that would have governed how virtual currency businesses operated in California has been cancelled by the state's Legislature. A number of organisations lobbied against AB-1326, most notably Bitcoin Foundation and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). They argued that regulation would stifle innovation and harm the industry, particularly at such an early stage .Colin Gallagher, Chair of Bitcoin Foundations Education Committee reported that, that the bill failed "in the face of overwhelming opposition". 

A draft bill that would have governed how virtual currency businesses can operate in California has been cancelled by the state's Legislature.

AB-1326, "Virtual Currency", was proposed to amend existing money transmission laws to include virtual currencies like Bitcoin Bitcoin While some may still be wondering what is Bitcoin, who created Bitcoin, or how does Bitcoin work, one thing is certain: Bitcoin has changed the world.No one can remain indifferent to this revolutionary, decentralized, digital asset nor to its blockchain technology.In fact, we’ve gone a long way ever since a Florida resident Laszlo Hanyecz made BTC’s first official commercial transaction with a real company by trading 10,000 Bitcoins for 2 pizzas at his local Papa John’s.One could now argue that While some may still be wondering what is Bitcoin, who created Bitcoin, or how does Bitcoin work, one thing is certain: Bitcoin has changed the world.No one can remain indifferent to this revolutionary, decentralized, digital asset nor to its blockchain technology.In fact, we’ve gone a long way ever since a Florida resident Laszlo Hanyecz made BTC’s first official commercial transaction with a real company by trading 10,000 Bitcoins for 2 pizzas at his local Papa John’s.One could now argue that Read this Term. If signed into law, it would have taken effect on July 1, 2016.

Initially, the draft bill was applauded by leading industry startups. Its third reading in the Senate happened to be at the same time as the finalization of New York's "BitLicense" regulations. Whereas California's proposed rules were initially the rough equivalent of money transmission laws applied to bitcoin, those of New York added multiple additional provisions specific to virtual currency. These were heavily criticized by industry players as excessively onerous, leading several to cease services in the state.

Bitcoin regulations potentially pack a greater impact for California, the country's leading state for technology, and which has the highest concentration of crypto industry venture activity. Likewise, New York's BitLicense regulations, which took effect in the summer, were a major focus of attention on the country's financial epicenter.

Despite initial optimism, a number of organizations later lobbied against AB-1326, most notably Bitcoin Foundation and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). They argued that Regulation Regulation Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority ( Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority ( Read this Term will stifle innovation and harm the industry, particularly at such an early stage. Other arguments further claimed that the policy wording was vague. Assemblyman Matt Dababneh, who spearheaded the bill, denied these claims and argued that the EFF "has little expertise" on matters pertaining to financial regulation.

A few weeks ago, the bill was further amended with additional reporting requirements for virtual currency businesses.

Despite passing several readings in the Assembly and Senate by unanimous or near-unanimous votes, the bill was unexpectedly shelved by Senator Holly Mitchell. The bill's status page now indicates that it is inactive, per the request of Senator Mitchell.

A Finance Magnates inquiry to Senator Mitchell's office for more details was unanswered.

Colin Gallagher, Chair of Bitcoin Foundation's Education Committee, reported that the bill failed to pass by September 11, the legislative deadline for all 2015-16 bills. He claimed that the bill failed "in the face of overwhelming opposition" and that "numerous veto requests were sent to the Governor by bill opponents in case AB 1326 ended up being rammed through in the late hours of Sept. 11."