New ring-fencing rules to cost HSBC £1.5 billion
HSBC says the cost to implement the Bank of England's new ring-fencing rules will be c. &pound;1.5bn, and argues that this will take vital resources away from more useful projects that the bank would prefer to be implementing, including improving customer service and the prevention of the mis-selling of the foreign exchange benchmark. Furthermore, senior bankers say that other regulatory reforms that are already underway in the banks make the need for ring-fencing redundant. &nbsp;However, the architect behind the ring-fencing plans, John Vickers, continues to argue that the rules are as necessary now as they were in 2011.
HSBC faces $2.4 billion bill for new ringfencing rules

By Matt Scuffham

LONDON, June 30 (Reuters) - HSBC will face a bill of around 1.5 billion pounds ($2.4 billion) to shield its domestic retail customers from riskier parts of its operations, the chairman of its UK business told lawmakers on Tuesday.

The Bank of England has told banks they must set up a boundary around their branch operations to protect taxpayers from any repetition of the multi billion-pound bailouts required during the financial crisis of 2007 to 2009.

Among the requirements will be new boards of directors for the ring-fenced entities, new staff contracts and separate pension schemes. Banks will also need to separate their risk-management and IT operations.

HSBC has said it will base its "ring-fenced" British retail and commercial banking business in Birmingham in central England, shifting about 1,000 staff there from its London headquarters.

"Our current estimates are around 1.5 billion pounds," Jonathan Symonds, the chairman of HSBC's UK bank told the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee.

"I think the ongoing costs won't be substantial other than the move to Birmingham but I think the one-off implementation costs are pretty substantial," Symonds said.

Lloyds Banking Group's Finance Director George Culmer said it would cost his bank "several hundred million" pounds to set up the ring-fenced bank with annual ongoing costs in the "tens of millions of pounds".

Lloyds, Britain's biggest retail bank, has less work to do as 97 percent of its operations will sit within the ring-fence. HSBC, which has much larger international and investment banking operations, will only have 30 to 40 percent of its business within the ring-fenced operation.

Some senior bankers believe other regulatory changes and structural reforms already underway within banks have made the need for ring-fencing redundant.

Former Barclays Chairman David Walker has said new capital and liquidity requirements introduced since the ICB's report and new European rules on the recovery and resolution of failing banks had eliminated the need for ringfencing.

However, John Vickers, who headed the Independent Commision on Banking (ICB) which recommended the new ringfencing rules in 2011, told the committee they were still necessary.

"In my view the case for those measures is every bit as strong as when we made our report four years ago, arguably stronger still," he said.

The ICB was tasked with making proposals to reform the industry after Britain bailed out Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group at a combined cost of 66 billion pounds during the crisis.

Bank of England Governor Mark Carney has said that new rules, including ringfencing, will enable large, globally important, banks to be wound down if they fail without the need for taxpayer-funded bailouts.