US judge rejects Deutsche Bank’s bid to throw out lawsuit 
Deutsche Bank has failed to have a lawsuit brought against it by investors thrown out by a US judge. Judge Lorna Schofield of the Southern District of New York narrowed, but refused to dismiss, the case. The proposed class-action lawsuit is related to the practice of delaying forex trades in order to get a "last look", which has allegedly been used by the bank since 2003. It is said that the practice allows Deutsche Bank to enrich itself by delaying trade processing at the expense of its clients. Last year, Barclays agreed to pay out $50m to regulators in a similar case.

A US judge on Tuesday narrowed but refused to dismiss a lawsuit seeking to save Deutsche Bank AG from being held liable to investors for delaying Forex Forex Foreign exchange or forex is the act of converting one nation’s currency into another nation’s currency (that possesses a different currency); for example, the converting of British Pounds into US Dollars, and vice versa. The exchange of currencies can be done over a physical counter, such as at a Bureau de Change, or over the internet via broker platforms, where currency speculation takes place, known as forex trading.The foreign exchange market, by its very nature, is the world’s largest tradi Foreign exchange or forex is the act of converting one nation’s currency into another nation’s currency (that possesses a different currency); for example, the converting of British Pounds into US Dollars, and vice versa. The exchange of currencies can be done over a physical counter, such as at a Bureau de Change, or over the internet via broker platforms, where currency speculation takes place, known as forex trading.The foreign exchange market, by its very nature, is the world’s largest tradi Read this Term trades to get a 'Last Look Last Look Last look is defined as the process where liquidity providers (LP) are rendered the chance to reject trades within a specific period. Generally, this practice by brokers is used to mitigate risk while rendering more favorable terms to the LP. This is due to significant risk that can arise from poorly concocted price quotes that can be used as an advantage by latency arbitragers. Not all last look settings are the same.Last look settings tend to vary by client, trading platform, a client’s connec Last look is defined as the process where liquidity providers (LP) are rendered the chance to reject trades within a specific period. Generally, this practice by brokers is used to mitigate risk while rendering more favorable terms to the LP. This is due to significant risk that can arise from poorly concocted price quotes that can be used as an advantage by latency arbitragers. Not all last look settings are the same.Last look settings tend to vary by client, trading platform, a client’s connec Read this Term', enabling the German bank to enrich itself at the expense of its clients.

The proposed class-action lawsuit sought to deny the request of Axiom Investment Advisors LLC, a New York-based forex trader, to pursue claims of contract breach over currency deals entered into on Deutsche Bank’s Autobahn platform and other trading networks, or ECNs.

Axiom Advisors was among thousands of traders that suffered millions in losses as Deutsche Bank programmed algorithms used by its platform to delay trade processing by at least several tenths of a second, according to the court documents.

The complaint alleged that Deutsche Bank has used this practice, dubbed 'last look', since at least 2003, but said it has gone undetected because most forex trades are anonymous. Axiom seeks damages for all US traders that placed trading orders that were matched with Deutsche Bank, rejected and matched again at a price that benefited the bank more since 2005.

In her decision, US District Judge Lorna Schofield in Manhattan said: “Autobahn's terms of service were ambiguous as to whether a binding agreement to trade arose when a customer's trade instruction was executed, permitting Deutsche Bank a last look, or received from the matching algorithm, not permitting a last look.”

Barclays fined in a similar suit

Schofield added that the service agreements for other ECNs could not be considered in deciding the motion to dismiss because they were made between Deutsche Bank and the ECN operators, and there was no evidence that Axiom agreed to their terms.

The judge also said Axiom can pursue an unjust enrichment claim, but dismissed claims under New York consumer protection laws because currency trading was "not consumer-oriented conduct."

British bank Barclays PLC was hit with a similar suit by Axiom in 2015 and already agreed to pay $50 million to settle with the US authorities. Axiom says that both lawsuits were related to a giant forex manipulation case ongoing against nine banks.

The German lender continues to face civil litigation in the US over its foreign currency trading but it hasn’t yet settled these matters with any agency.