SFC fines Guotai Junan Securities
Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has fined Guotai Junan Securities $1.4m following its failure to comply with SFC regulatory requirements regarding client identity. Guotai Junan was unable to provide details of clients of certain transactions after ignoring obligations set out by the SFC stating the regulators must refuse business to those not prepared to provide ultimate client information.
Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) announced today that it has reprimanded and fined Guotai Junan Securities Ltd (Hong Kong) $1.3 million for failing to comply with its regulatory requirements in relation to ascertaining client identity.

The fine follows a further seven figure penalty which was imposed on Unicorn Unicorn Unicorns represent privately held startup companies whose value exceeds $1 billion. The term itself was coined by venture capitalist Aileen Lee back in 2013, with Unicorns since assuming the gold standard of companies.At the time of writing, approximately 465 unicorns exist, with standouts becoming ubiquitous in everyday life. This includes Ant Financial, DiDi, Airbnb, Stripe, Lyft, and Palantir Technologies, among many others.While all wildly successful, many unicorns are themselves the product Unicorns represent privately held startup companies whose value exceeds $1 billion. The term itself was coined by venture capitalist Aileen Lee back in 2013, with Unicorns since assuming the gold standard of companies.At the time of writing, approximately 465 unicorns exist, with standouts becoming ubiquitous in everyday life. This includes Ant Financial, DiDi, Airbnb, Stripe, Lyft, and Palantir Technologies, among many others.While all wildly successful, many unicorns are themselves the product Read this Term Securities Company Ltd in March this year, as reported by Finance Magnates.

The new world of online trading, fintech and marketing - register now for the Finance Magnates Tel Aviv Conference, June 29th 2016.

Client Identity Rule

The Client Identity Rule policy stipulates that a licensed person must refuse the business of those who are not prepared to provide client identity information to the regulators on request.

It also stipulates that if a licensed person has been put on notice that an intermediary involved in a transaction does not comply with its agreement in relation to that transaction, the SFC will consider taking disciplinary action against the licensed person.

Failed To Comply

In July 2014, the SFC requested that Guotai Junan provide details of the ultimate clients of certain transactions it effected for an intermediary client in Korea. Guotai Junan was unable to provide the requested information in accordance with the Client Identity Rule policy.

The intermediary client then informed the SFC and Guotai Junan on 1 August 2014 that it could not provide the requested client identity information without its clients’ written consent. Guotai Junan did not provide the requested information to the SFC until January 2015.

Guotai Junan then continued to effect over 8,000 transactions for the intermediary client between August 2014 and January 2015 despite having been reminded by the SFC of its obligation to refuse the business of those who are not prepared to provide ultimate client information to the regulators.

The SFC concluded that it could no longer be satisfied that Guotai Junan would be able to make available the ultimate client information on request and the company is now facing a $1.3 million fine for contravening its rules and regulations.