according to descartes machines could not think because of what
The phrase “The Turing Test” is most properly used to refer to a proposal made by Turing (1950) as a way of dealing with the question whether machines can think.According to Turing, the question whether machines can think is itself “too meaningless” to deserve discussion (442).uring (1950) describes the following kind of game. Suppose that we have a person, a machine, and an interrogator. The interrogator is in a room separated from the other person and the machine. The object of the game is for the interrogator to determine which of the other two is the person, and which is the machine. Descartes argues that the mind is independent of the body (and so not the body), because he can conceive of it existing without the body. Now if the mind can exist without the body, then it cannot be the same thing as the body.But from just Descartes’ thought, we cannot infer this.escartes’ claim that the mind’s essential property is thinking, damage to certain parts of. the brain can make someone unable to think. So alterations in the body can affect the. essential property of the mind; so the mind does not have even its essential property. independently of the body. OBJECTIONS TO DESCARTES’ ARGUMENT Knowledge and reality Most philosophers believe Descartes’ argument that the mind can exist without the body, as it is given above, doesn’t work. Just because Descartes can think of his mind existing without his body, this doesn’t mean that his mind really can exist without his body.escartes’ claim that the mind’s essential property is thinking, damage to certain parts of. the brain can make someone unable to think. So alterations in the body can affect the. essential property of the mind; so the mind does not have even its essential property. independently of the body. (Rene Descartes, Meditations 6). Descartes is correct that the body is a machine, but the mind is also a machine, and so is the universe. So really we should say there is a machine (mind) in a machine (body) which are both part of one machine (the universe). think I exist as a material body in space and that I can see and interact with other material things in the space around me, including other thinking things (other humans). 3. Thus three things seem to exist in an interconnected way; i) Many thinking minds (of which I am certain of my own). Descartes concedes, however, that though what he perceives with his senses may be false, he cannot deny that he perceives. So the human mind is capable of both thought and perception. He explains this using the example of a piece of wax.We understand that solid wax and wax melted by a candle are both wax.escartes concedes, however, that though what he perceives with his senses may be false, he cannot deny that he perceives. So the human mind is capable of both thought and perception. He explains this using the example of a piece of wax. We understand that solid wax and wax melted by a candle are both wax. Rene René (descartes—1596). 1650 Rene rené descartes is often credited with “Being the Father Of.” Modern philosophy this title is justified due both to his break with The-Traditional scholastic aristotelian philosophy prevalent at his time and to his development and promotion of, the new. mechanistic sciencesene René descartes was born To Joachim descartes And Jeanne brochard On march, 31 1596 In La, Haye france Near. Tours he was the youngest of the’couple s three surviving. Children the oldest, Child, pierre died soon after his birth On october, 19. 1589 The reason for this lack of concern is his conviction expressed to both Gassendi and Elizabeth that the problem rests upon a misunderstanding about the union between mind and body. Though he does not elaborate to Gassendi, Descartes does provide some insight in a 21 May 1643 letter to Elizabeth.ene René descartes was born To Joachim descartes And Jeanne brochard On march, 31 1596 In La, Haye france Near. Tours he was the youngest of the’couple s three surviving. Children the oldest, Child, pierre died soon after his birth On october, 19. 1589 First, there is a discussion of Turing's paper (1950), and of the arguments contained therein. Second, there is a discussion of current assessments of various proposals that have been called “The Turing Test” (whether or not there is much merit in the application of this label to the proposals in question).uring (1950) describes the following kind of game. Suppose that we have a person, a machine, and an interrogator. The interrogator is in a room separated from the other person and the machine. The object of the game is for the interrogator to determine which of the other two is the person, and which is the machine. On the one hand, Descartes argues that the mind is indivisible because he cannot perceive himself as having any parts. On the other hand, the body is divisible because he cannot think of a body except as having parts. Hence, if mind and body had the same nature, it would be a nature both with and without parts.e reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind (that is, a thinking, non-extended thing) is completely different from that of the body (that is, an extended, non-thinking thing), and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. First he decides he can be certain that he exists, because if he doubts, there must be a thinking mind to do the doubting. He does not yet accept that he is a thinking mind inside a body. After all, the demon could have convinced him that his body and the physical world exist.escartes concedes, however, that though what he perceives with his senses may be false, he cannot deny that he perceives. So the human mind is capable of both thought and perception. He explains this using the example of a piece of wax. We understand that solid wax and wax melted by a candle are both wax.
Because body is divisible.