How much does france spend on health care
Expenditure as a percentage of GDP: 11.6% (3rd highest). Life expectancy: 82.2 years. Although nine countries in the OECD spent more on health care per person than France’s $4,118, only two countries exceeded France’s health care expense as a percent of GDP of 11.6%.orway spent $4,813 in public funds per person on health care, the most of any country considered. One thing that may allow Norway to spend so much on health care: the nation is one of the world’s largest oil exporters and, as a result, has a massive budget surplus, and has built up over $700 billion in savings. The U.S. spent $8,233 on health per person in 2010. Norway, the Netherlands and Switzerland are the next highest spenders, but in the same year, they all spent at least $3,000 less per person. The average spending on health care among the other 33 developed OECD countries was $3,268 per person.The U.S. is a very rich country, but even so, it devotes far more of its economy — 17.6 percent of GDP in 2010 — to health than any other country.orway, the Netherlands and Switzerland are the next highest spenders, but in the same year, they all spent at least $3,000 less per person. The average spending on health care among the other 33 developed OECD countries was $3,268 per person. In 2011, France spent 11.6% of GDP on health care, or US$4,086 per capita, a figure much higher than the average spent by countries in Europe but less than in the US.he French government generally refunds patients 70% of most health care costs, and 100% in case of costly or long-term ailments. Supplemental coverage may be bought from private insurers, most of them nonprofit, mutual insurers. 1. United States. The U.S. spent $8,745 per person on health care in 2012, roughly $2,500 more than Norway, the second highest spender per capita. On average, OECD countries spent $3,484 per capita on health care.The U.S. also dedicated 17% of its GDP to health care, the highest in the OECD.hile only one country spent more on health on a per capita basis, Norway's health care spending as a percent of GDP was in line with the OECD average of around 9.3%. This was likely due to Norway's exceptionally high GDP of nearly $55,000 per capita last year, the second highest among OECD nations. That figure is more than two-and-a-half times more than most developed nations in the world, including relatively rich European countries like France, Sweden and the United Kingdom. On a more global scale, it means U.S. health care costs now eat up 17.6 percent of GDP.orway, the Netherlands and Switzerland are the next highest spenders, but in the same year, they all spent at least $3,000 less per person. The average spending on health care among the other 33 developed OECD countries was $3,268 per person. Luxembourg spent $4,755 per capita on health care, one of the highest figures among OECD member nations. But because of its high per capita GDP—the second-highest in the world in 2012 at nearly $80,000, according to the IMF—total health-care expenditure equaled just 8.2% of GDP.orway spent $4,813 in public funds per person on health care, the most of any country considered. One thing that may allow Norway to spend so much on health care: the nation is one of the world’s largest oil exporters and, as a result, has a massive budget surplus, and has built up over $700 billion in savings. Total health care spending in the United States is expected to reach $4.8 trillion in 2021, up from $2.6 trillion in 2010 and $75 billion in 1970. To put it in context, this means that health care spending will account for nearly 20 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), or one-fifth of the U.S. economy, by 2021..S. health care spending breakdown. Health care spending in the United States totaled nearly $2.6 trillion in 2010. Of total spending, half (51 percent) goes to pay the cost of medical services provided by hospitals and physicians. The U.S. spent nearly $8,000 per person in 2009 on health care services, while other countries in the study spent between one-third (Japan and New Zealand) and two-thirds (Norway and Switzerland) as much.apan’s spending, which was the lowest, amounted to less than 9 percent of GDP. Higher U.S. Spending Linked to Higher Prices for Goods and Services, Not More Services. High U.S. spending on health care does not seem to be explained by either greater supply or higher utilization of health care services. While only one country spent more on health on a per capita basis, Norway's health care spending as a percent of GDP was in line with the OECD average of around 9.3%. This was likely due to Norway's exceptionally high GDP of nearly $55,000 per capita last year, the second highest among OECD nations.hile only one country spent more on health on a per capita basis, Norway's health care spending as a percent of GDP was in line with the OECD average of around 9.3%. This was likely due to Norway's exceptionally high GDP of nearly $55,000 per capita last year, the second highest among OECD nations. U.S. health care spending amounted to more than 17 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2009, compared with 12 percent or less in other study countries. Japan’s spending, which was the lowest, amounted to less than 9 percent of GDP.Higher U.S. Spending Linked to Higher Prices for Goods and Services, Not More Services. High U.S. spending on health care does not seem to be explained by either greater supply or higher utilization of health care services.There were 2.4 physicians per 1,000 population in the U.S. in 2009, fewer than in all the countries in the study except Japan.apan’s spending, which was the lowest, amounted to less than 9 percent of GDP. Higher U.S. Spending Linked to Higher Prices for Goods and Services, Not More Services. High U.S. spending on health care does not seem to be explained by either greater supply or higher utilization of health care services.
$4,118