are arabs caucasian
Arabs are Arabid. Arabid is a sub race of Mediterranean caucasian race. Arabs are Caucasians since they have the same origins as Europeans. It's also important to note that Caucasians evolved in the Middle East (near the Caucasus,east arab levant, north of Iran).The ''Caucasians'' include: Arabs, North African (Berbers), Iranians, north Indian Subcontinental people, Europeans etc.rabid is a sub race of Mediterranean caucasian race. Arabs are Caucasians since they have the same origins as Europeans. Arabid is a sub race of Mediterranean caucasian race. Arabs are Caucasians since they have the same origins as Europeans.It's also important to note that Caucasians evolved in the Middle East (near the Caucasus,east arab levant, north of Iran).The ''Caucasians'' include: Arabs, North African (Berbers), Iranians, north Indian Subcontinental people, Europeans etc.rabid is a sub race of Mediterranean caucasian race. Arabs are Caucasians since they have the same origins as Europeans. Best Answer: Yes Arabs are Caucasians since they have the same origins as Europeans. It's also important to note that Caucasians evolved in the Middle East (near the Caucasus, north of Iran). The ''Caucasians'' include: Arabs, North African (Berbers), Iranians, Indian Subcontinental people, Europeans etc.The predominant racial type in all those areas is Caucasian.he part that bothers me is when people from the US and Europe (some not all) consider them non semitic and they are not caucasian and i assure u they can have blue eyes, most that i met are white the only reason they have olive skin... as someone already said all people from europe, middle east and north africa are considered white/caucasian. white doesn't mean your skin is actually white like milk. people in southern europe, like italy, greece, portugal..... can actually have a darker complexion than some arabs and persians for example.nthropologists classify Arabs as Caucasian because of bone structure. But in this case East Indians should also be classified as Caucasian. However in the US, because they emphasize skin color more than bone structure, they did not classify East Indians as Caucasians. White and Caucasian are terms that have been widely termed as the same. But it is only a misconception. A White is never called as Caucasian whereas a Caucasian can be called as white. When comparing the two races, Caucasian is a larger race when compared to the other.The Caucasian race consists of North Africans, Arabs, Whites, Somalians, some people in India and Ethiopians. On the other hand, white are mostly people who belong to Europe.3. When compared to the Caucasian, the white people have a lighter skin.t should also be noted that though people in North Africa and South Asia can be technically called as Caucasian, they are not considered so as they have darker features. The main difference between White and Caucasian is related to the skin colour. When compared to the Caucasian, the white people have a lighter skin. Yes. Typically Kurds are considered a Caucasian people in the same  way that Persians are considered a Caucasian people. They have  darker pigmentation than Europeans, but t … ypically lighter than  Arabian Arabs, and color-wise indistinguishable from Mesopotamian  Arabs.6 people found this useful.ypically Kurds are considered a Caucasian people in the same  way that Persians are considered a Caucasian people. They have  darker pigmentation than Europeans, but t … ypically lighter than  Arabian Arabs, and color-wise indistinguishable from Mesopotamian  Arabs. 6 people found this useful. Best Answer: You're right that it is a problem. Also, some Arabs and Persians get confused and put other or even Asian, but they are supposed to put white/caucasian. This is actually a problem in assessing how life is for Middle Eastern people.nthropologists classify Arabs as Caucasian because of bone structure. But in this case East Indians should also be classified as Caucasian. However in the US, because they emphasize skin color more than bone structure, they did not classify East Indians as Caucasians. ONLY PARTLY YES but they are not fully Caucasoid regardless if they have the same origin as Europeans if so then literally all people would be considered Caucasian because we all have the same origins.You do not have to have white skin to be called Caucasian but calling Arabs fully Caucasian is wrong.he part that bothers me is when people from the US and Europe (some not all) consider them non semitic and they are not caucasian and i assure u they can have blue eyes, most that i met are white the only reason they have olive skin... But Arabs have always been known as white, some people in the Middle East, are mixed with African thats why some are darker, and have African facial features. And you will find some Arabs of olive skin tone, because of the climate, just like Italians and Greeks.nthropologists classify Arabs as Caucasian because of bone structure. But in this case East Indians should also be classified as Caucasian. However in the US, because they emphasize skin color more than bone structure, they did not classify East Indians as Caucasians. I consider arabs caucasians because they have a diminutive mixture with other races and the only races they are mixed with in their heritage ancestors background its european white people.he part that bothers me is when people from the US and Europe (some not all) consider them non semitic and they are not caucasian and i assure u they can have blue eyes, most that i met are white the only reason they have olive skin...
Yes