are executive orders unconstitutional
Petition to End Unconstitutional Executive Orders. America does not have a king. Our Constitution is designed around a system of checks and balances, where an elected President works with an elected Congress to pass laws that comply with the Constitution.ather than work with a Republican Congress, President Obama pledged to use the “pen” and the “phone” to craft executive orders to bypass Congress. That’s unacceptable. That’s unconstitutional. And at the ACLJ we’ll challenge the Obama Administration in court to defend the Constitution. An executive order itself is not unconstitutional at all providing that the content of the executive order falls under the powers granted to the president in the second article of the constitution.Obama's executive order pardons an entire group of illegal immigrants which is completely covered under that article.otally Unconstitutional. The president / executive branch's primary role is to be head of state, commander in chief. He may ratify treaties, sign legislation from the legislative branch (congress) into law or veto it. He does not have the authority to make legislation through executive order. “When a President issues an unconstitutional Executive Order and Congress allows the order to stand they are violating their oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.”. If Congress does not veto an Executive Order, it is NOT unconstitutional in the eyes of Congress.If Congress allows an Executive Order to stand unchallenged, either the EO IS constitutional or Congress is also at fault.otally Unconstitutional. The president / executive branch's primary role is to be head of state, commander in chief. He may ratify treaties, sign legislation from the legislative branch (congress) into law or veto it. He does not have the authority to make legislation through executive order. In Article I Section I of the Constitution it is clear that all legislative powers reside in Congress. The Executive Branch has the responsibility to execute the laws passed by Congess. An Executive Order is not legislation it is a order issued by the President to enforce laws passed by the Congress.he Executive Branch has the responsibility to execute the laws passed by Congess. An Executive Order is not legislation it is a order issued by the President to enforce laws passed by the Congress. Even liberals are admitting it. Michael Mukasey, who was the Attorney General under President George W. Bush, is speaking out against Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders, saying, “That’s not how it works when somebody takes the oath he took seriously.”.Fox News Insider reports :ven liberals are admitting it. Michael Mukasey, who was the Attorney General under President George W. Bush, is speaking out against Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders, saying, “That’s not how it works when somebody takes the oath he took seriously.”. Reuters. An aide to former President Bill Clinton once described them as “kinda cool.” But to Republicans, executive orders under President Barack Obama -- and Obama’s apparently imminent use of one to overhaul immigration policy -- are unconstitutional, and may even be the impetus for impeachment proceedings..S. President Barack Obama's signature is seen on a set of executive orders that he signed prior to unveiling a series of proposals to counter gun violence, at the White House, Jan. 16, 2013. Reuters. Judge Michael Mukasey, former U.S. attorney general under President George W. Bush, says he is. Mukasey pointed out to Megyn Kelly that it was a mere two days into President Obama’s first term when he started signing executive orders.ven liberals are admitting it. Michael Mukasey, who was the Attorney General under President George W. Bush, is speaking out against Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders, saying, “That’s not how it works when somebody takes the oath he took seriously.”. Say No to Unconstitutional Orders. President Obama, Your executive orders cannot trump the Constitution. Put down the pen, hang up the phone, and work with Congress like every other President in our nation’s history.ather than work with a Republican Congress, President Obama pledged to use the “pen” and the “phone” to craft executive orders to bypass Congress. That’s unacceptable. That’s unconstitutional. And at the ACLJ we’ll challenge the Obama Administration in court to defend the Constitution. Totally Unconstitutional. The president / executive branch's primary role is to be head of state, commander in chief. He may ratify treaties, sign legislation from the legislative branch (congress) into law or veto it. He does not have the authority to make legislation through executive order.otally Unconstitutional. The president / executive branch's primary role is to be head of state, commander in chief. He may ratify treaties, sign legislation from the legislative branch (congress) into law or veto it. He does not have the authority to make legislation through executive order. Submitted by Martin Armstrong via Armstrong Economics, A federal judge, Judge Arthur J. Schwab of the Western District of Pennsylvania, used a deportation decision to probe the constitutionality of President Obama’s executive order on amnesty, declaring it “unconstitutional.”.t is about time that Executive Orders are challenged in court for they are absolutely unconstitutional since they smack of a dictatorial abuse of power that denies the people the right to decide the fate of their nation.
No