Vaccination is an established medical
measure worldwide. Vaccines are so established that any doubts, let alone
criticism, are not allowed. Many mothers and even medical professional can
confirm this.

Vaccination was invented during the time
of the great epidemics, when human kind, especially medical professionals, had
to watch powerlessly how whole towns were wiped out by epidemics.

In those days, as is still habit today,
doctors tried desperately to find a prophylaxis instead of finding the cause of
these diseases. Vaccines were developed from this attempt to find a prophylaxis.

The picture looks different today. Not
only have plague or cholera epidemics been long gone, a different relationship
has been established between people in the industrialized countries and
diseases, compared to earlier generations.

Today we grow up in an environment in
which illness is an annoying break from routine, in the economy as well as
medicine. Not only us adults are expected that we return to work, recovered,
within a few days, but children are not allowed to be ill and stay in bed
either.

We are seen as machines, which have to
constantly function equally well all the time. And since it is possible to avoid
diseases, it is being practiced. Vaccines are part of this strategy.

What we need today is not constantly new
vaccines against newly found diseases; instead, we need a new relationship to
diseases in general. We have to relearn to accept illness as a normal part of
life. The machine that never falls ill controls our thinking. And we tend to
forget that this machine eventually has to be exchanged. However, the human
being has powers of life and regeneration, which by far compensate for the
apparent disadvantage of a temporary illness.

Not only us parents, but also especially
the medical profession equate illness with complications. The fact that, say,
only a very small proportion would suffer encephalitis when contracting measles,
whereas with all others this disease runs its course wholly uneventful, has been
forgotten.

Today we know that childhood diseases
have a strengthening and healing effect on the children and help maintain health
during adulthood. This fact has always been known to older generations.

This is clearest with measles. Chronic
tendencies, such as recurring respiratory infections 1, often heal
after measles. Chronic health problems disappear, such as psoriasis or chronic
kidney problems. The children’s hospital in Basle (Switzerland) used to get
children with chronic kidney infections to contract measles intentionally in
order to heal them, up until the 1960s 2. Children susceptible to
infections are healthier and stronger after contracting measles; the need for
medical treatment clearly decreases 3. Children in the Third World
countries are less likely to contract malaria and parasites after measles 4.
The risk to suffer breast cancer decreases to less than half 5. MS is
also much lower in people who had measles 6.

Hay fever is more rare in children who
have older siblings and had measles than in those who were vaccinated against
measles 7.

A large African study showed that
children who have had measles are 50% less at risk from allergies than those
vaccinated 8,9. Furthermore it is shown that experiencing
measles protects from diseases of the immune system, skin diseases as well as
degenerative cartilage, bone and tumourous diseases 10.

English and American researchers also
found that adult women are less likely to contract ovarian cancer if they had
measles, mumps, but especially rubella during childhood.

These are just rays of light. In detail,
the protective effects after childhood diseases are far greater. Parents who
accompanied their child through a childhood disease and who noticed the change
will know what I am talking about.

If we look at the epidemiological
situation of all childhood diseases we must say that the introduction of these
particular vaccines were not indicated in any country at any time. These
diseases neither led to bad or frequent complications nor did they occur that
often. In the contrary, before these vaccines were introduced, infants were
protected through the nest protection of the mother, and the vast majority of
these diseases happened before puberty. Just as nature had intended.

We managed, through our interference
with nature, to move these diseases into either infancy, due to the lack of nest
protection of the mother, or into teenage and adult age. And there these
diseases can be incomparably more problematic.

This extrusion of the diseases into an
older age has nothing to do with a “protection” or good efficacy of the
vaccination, but the overall organism of the vaccinated person is weakened
permanently and unable to react, so that the vaccinated does not have the
strength to allow the disease to happen by itself 11.

Mass vaccinations of all infants have
destroyed the natural and steady contagion to such an effect that epidemics can
occur again, as we can observe in countries with a high vaccination rate, such
as USA and Finland. Complications and death are incomparably more frequent than
before the introduction of mass vaccination. The encephalitis rate after measles
has since risen ten-fold in the US 12.

With regard to the HIB vaccine, it is
always suggested to us, that thanks to the vaccine many cases of meningitis are
avoided. However, the fact that before the introduction of this vaccine this was
not a notifiable disease is never mentioned, and therefore the number of cases
is not known.

According to studies in Bavaria
(Germany) and Finland, the total number of meningitis cases however did not
decrease, to the contrary 13,14,15.

Today, an increasing number of
meningitis cases are reported caused by meningococcal B and C. Anthroposophical
doctors talk about a shift of the virus in this context. Instead of recognizing
the cause and make right decisions now, it’s business as usual, that is new
vaccines are being developed for new diseases.

We have lost the ability to deal with
diseases. Instead of strengthening our and our children’s immune system, we
fight fever and practice an intensive treatment of symptoms. However, fever is
one of the most important processes that take place in our body.

On the basis of observations by the
Vienna surgeon Professor Schmidt, which took place over decades in his practice
16, studies in the last 100 years have shown consistently that
people who experienced childhood diseases accompanied by fever were less likely
to suffer from cancer in later life 17, 18,19,20.

Therefore, an avoidance of childhood
diseases is not sensible, but the avoidance of complications.

Other infectious diseases, such as
polio, diphtheria, cholera, etc. no longer occur as epidemics because we have
improved living standards, hygiene, diet and sanitation in our part of the
world.

Today’s common vaccines cannot avoid
childhood diseases nor their complications, as can be seen with the various
epidemics where mainly the vaccinated come down with the disease. I will get
back to this later. Even if the vaccines gave us 100% protection from the
illness, we would have to decline them for epidemiological reasons, especially
with regard to childhood diseases.

Constant lack of challenge as well as
untimely over challenge of the immune system can lead to permanent weaknesses
and damages. If we want to protect our children from everything and everyone,
the immune system is lacking challenges and cannot develop. There are many
studies that prove that especially children living on farms have fewer problems
with allergies than the “clean” city children 21,22.

Health is a dynamic balance between
challenging and processing. The child’s typical situation in today’s western
world tends to be more a lack of challenge in the development of the immune
system with a concurrent overload in perception and in the area of intellectual
thinking. This lack of challenge is certainly helped by excessive hygienic
measures. Even Paracelsus said that everything is healthy in moderation only;
this applies particularly to our hygiene. Even today’s scientists are
increasingly in favour of letting our children play in dirt, whereas a few years
ago, they would have preferred to disinfect every child twice a day.

Vaccines represent in principle an
invasion into the human immune system. The mass vaccination campaigns, however,
are invasions into the ecological balances between human beings and microbes.
These balances did not just happen over the past few years, they have developed
over many, many generations, with the result being a relatively reliable
relationship between host and microbe. However, a vaccination program as we
witness it, covering whole areas or even countries, includes whole age groups
and results in considerable changes in a short time. The suppression of the
natural disease can lead to severely damaging consequences from an
epidemiological point of view. Be reminded of the measles epidemic of 1846 on
the islands of Faeroe. No measles case had occurred there for more than 65
years. When a Danish worker brought the disease into the area, 6000 out of the
total 7,782 inhabitants contracted the disease, 200 died23. The same
observations were made on the Fiji Islands, Greenland, Canada and New Guinea.
There, the death rate was approximately 25%24,25,26,27.

So even if the vaccines would offer
protection it would not be beneficial for us to be vaccinated. Today, the medical establishment admits
that polio used to occur nearly always without the paralysis, which is so feared
today. This paralysis only occurred when the smallpox vaccine was widely used,
ie. 200 years ago28. With the smallpox vaccination, we have changed,
or weakened the human organism to such an extent that polio became a dangerous
disease.

But what does the so strongly
propagandised protection look like after a vaccination. Does the vaccination
protect us from the disease? One can only answer with a clear No. To
this day, no independent efficacy studies exist about the vaccines. I’ll give
some examples how much these vaccines can “protect” us:

Switzerland was affected by a mumps
epidemic from Autumn 1999 until Spring 2000. The Swiss Federal Office for Health
(BAG) eventually admitted, upon the pressure of the medical profession, that
more than 75% of those who contracted Mumps had been fully up to date with their
vaccinations29. No further comment is necessary here!

The main fear that is propagandised with
regard to rubella is the rubella embryopathy. What we are not told is, for
example, that there were 4 cases of RE in Switzerland between 1995 and 2001 of
which two women were fully vaccinated against rubella30. The only
protection a pregnant woman has from rubella is that she contracted rubella
during her childhood. We should therefore offer our girls the chance to contract
rubella.

A tetanus vaccination cannot possibly
protect from the disease since the human organism cannot build up any immunity
after contracting the disease (as is the same after HIB, diphtheria or TB). So,
if nature hasn’t planned the immunity, how does the vaccine work?

Furthermore, the tetanus vaccination (as
is the case with the diphtheria vaccine) is a so-called toxoid vaccine. The
killed poison of the tetanus bacilli is injected into the body and meant to
protect us. But the human body cannot build up immunity against poisons31.
How can the vaccine protect us then? The official statistics of the various
countries show us that the vaccine does not protect us. The Robert Koch
Institute in Germany admits that 2/3 people who contract tetanus have been fully
vaccinated32. The rate in Switzerland was 50% fully vaccinated and
still contracted the disease.

What applies to the tetanus vaccination
equally applies to the diphtheria vaccination. According to official reports,
approximately 80% of adult people would have to be fully vaccinated against
diphtheria in order for this disease not to occur as an epidemic. However, in
the German speaking areas, less than 25-30% of adults are vaccinated. Why have
there been no epidemics? Because diphtheria requires certain socio-economic
conditions for it to break out. These are war and poverty. Russia and the
Ukraine still experience diphtheria epidemics, despite the fact that more than
90% of people are fully vaccinated (with a Swiss vaccine!)34,35,36.
This disease should not exist there, if the vaccine protected.

During the 1960s, the WHO organised a
field study in India in order to establish the efficacy of the TB vaccine. Two
groups took part in this study, each group comprising 375,000 people in the
province of Madras. One group was vaccinated against TB; the other group was not
vaccinated. After 7 ˝ years, in 1971, this field study was stopped, for
“ethical” reasons. The conclusion of the study was: “The efficacy of the TB
vaccine is 0%”37. Even though it is impossible to have any worse
efficacy (!), it took until March 1998 before vaccination was stopped in
Germany, October 1998 in Switzerland and March 2000 in Austria. Why did this
news take more than 27 years to reach Europe?

I can only explain it this way: The WHO
sent someone from Madras in 1971 on a walk to spread the good news of the
inefficacy of this vaccine all over the world. As Europe is very far away, the
poor man required much time. This walker, by the way, has not reached France
yet, the vaccine is still mandated for all new born babies.

The German speaking countries only
stopped to vaccinate their own children. Foreign children are still vaccinated.
Presumably this vaccine only works effectively with certain passport colours!

All infectious diseases decreased
without vaccinations. Not only did vaccines have no influence over the decrease
of the diseases, the contrary is true, they slowed down the downward trend of
all diseases. The best example for this is polio. After the majority of people
were vaccinated, severe epidemics occurred, such as in 1962 in the German
speaking countries, after vaccination had been in full force for 3 years.

Dr Buchwald carefully collected the
facts in his book, which prove this fact beyond doubt for all infectious
diseases38.

Not only do vaccinations not protect,
they can indeed cause massive damage.

Illness is inevitably part of being
human. The demand for the elimination of diseases will not eliminate the
microbe, but it will question humanity. This is becoming all too clear when we
look at our authorities’ strategies implemented to achieve better vaccination
rates. Often, these measures serve to introduce mandated vaccination through the
back door, as we could see in Germany, where unvaccinated children can suddenly
be expelled from school. Or as is the case in Upper Austria, where the payment
of a mother/child benefit is linked to the up to date vaccination record. And
this despite neither Germany nor Austria having mandated vaccination.

Also be reminded of the state in Italy
and France, where parents are forced by police to have their children
vaccinated.

Vaccine sceptic health professionals are
increasingly put under pressure by authorities as well as their own
organisations as we saw at the measles epidemic in Coburg (Germany) in Spring
2002.

To show the disproportional status, here
is an example. Every year, approximately 3.4 million people die, according to
the WHO, due to famine, previous diarrhoea diseases in association with famine.

No vaccination can exist against this.

But it would be feasible to use the
billions that are spent annually for vaccinations, for providing wells, to
provide real development aid in order to stop the famine and to end wars.

This would take out the basis for most
infectious disease, and would result in healthy people.

It would also be a possibility for us
industrialised countries to balance out our old and new debt to these people.