Q:

Is the Higgs boson not responsible for most mass?

The video "Your Mass is NOT from Higgs Boson?" argues that almost all the mass that we are made of doesn't come interaction with the Higgs field, but rather that most of a nucleus's mass comes from the space between quarks (the quark-gluon plasma).
If the video is correct, then there really needs to be an easy-to-understand explanation for mass because science popularizers make us laypeople think that the Higgs mechanism is responsible for all the mass in the atoms and that would be of course very misleading.

A:

Higgs mechanism is not the universal mass-responsible detail, but the ultimate. Other mechanisms could give you large quantities of mass - and in fact they do - but there is still some part which they are unable to explain. And that's why the Higgs mechanism is needed.
Numbers for you:
For the atom of hydrogen:
Total mass - about 1 GeV
Electromagnetic field - several eV (billionth parts)
Nuclear force field - none
Masses of electron and quarks - by Higgs mechanism - about 20 MeV
The rest is due to gluons (and virtual quarks) tension and motion.
For other atoms:
Total mass - about 1 GeV per nucleon (proton or neutron)
Electromagnetic field - up to keV per proton (not the field inside the nucleus itself)
Nuclear force field - up to several MeV per nucleon
Electromagnetic field inside the nucleus - up to the same as nuclear force field's part
Masses of electrons and quarks - by Higgs mechanism - about 20 MeV per nucleon
The rest is due to ... see above.

A:

The experimentalist's answer:
1) Experimental physics has established with very many experiments that the underlying framework of nature is quantum mechanical, and this includes special relativity, when the energies are appropriate. It is dependent on a very small number of elementary particles out of which all matter that we have observed and experimented with  in our laboratories is composed.
2) The definition of mass that you are worrying about is the everyday one described well by  classical mechanics, as the resistance to a force applied.

Inertial mass measures an object's resistance to changes in velocity m=F/a. (the object's acceleration).

In the regime of relativistic physics an elementary particle as seen  in this table has a rest mass:$\hspace{50px}$.

Elementary particles included in the Standard Model

They have a mass given in the table, except  for the two top ones in the column in red, which are massless particles. These particles in various bound states compose the protons (quarks and gluons) and neutrons, the protons and neutrons bound make the nuclei of the atoms and gather around them the electrons  and the atoms make up the solids. 
If you look at the masses they could never sum up to the mass of the proton $\left(1\frac{\mathrm{GeV}}{c^2}\right).$
What happens is that the addition is not of scalar masses, but of four vectors, the three dimensional momenta that we know plus the energy as the fourth component in the special metric of special relativity. The mass, in this framework is the corresponding  "length" of three dimensions  and is called the "invariant mass" : For the elementary particles this "length" is identical with the mass of the table . When two elementary particles form another particle, or come out of a particle , the mass of the composite particle  is a function of the four dimensional vector addition of the individual elementary particles composing it . 
For example there exists a particle called pion $\left(\pi^0\right)$, of mass $135 \frac{\mathrm{MeV}}{c^2}.$ It decays into two massless photons. The two photon system has the invariant mass of the ${\pi}^0$ even though  each photon has mass zero. 
A hierarchy is built up then, elementary particles, (quarks, gluons) combine to compose the protons and neutrons, protons and neutrons combine to compose nuclei, electrons plus nuclei compose atoms.The composite invariant mass at one level becomes the rest mass of the next level's basic particles. Each level has less kinetic energy in the combination than the previous level ,  so the masses start to resemble the classical mechanics masses. When we reach solids and liquids of dimensions larger than nanometers, the relativistic effects can be  ignored . 
Where does the Higgs field come in, in this saga? It only affects the invariant masses of the elementary particles in the table , their rest masses. The bulk of the masses we measure macroscopically are a build up, level by level, on these elementary particles and their binding energies. The high energies that bind the under lying layers become macroscopically  the classical mechanics masses.
A good point is to think of the binding energy curve and  nuclear reactions where we see the opposite process: classical mass turning into energy by destroying the level of compositeness. 

A:

A particle physicist told me that Higgs fields explains just a small part of the mass, while most of the mass is due to the energy binding de protons in the nucleus (which is described using QCD).
So I think that what the video says is right.

