Liberal - William Lyon Mackenzie King
was re-elected Prime Minister from October 23, 1935 to November 15, 1948.

Quotes by Former Prime Ministers and
Presidents

King was first elected to Parliament
as a Liberal in a 1908 by-election, and was re-elected by acclamation in a 1909
by-election following his appointment as the first-ever Minister of Labour.

King's term as Minister of Labour
legislation significantly improved the financial situation for millions of
Canadian workers. He lost his seat in the 1911 general election, which saw the
Conservatives defeat his Liberals.

After his defeat King went on the
lecture circuit on behalf of the Liberal Party.

But then In June 1914 John D.
Rockefeller, Jr. hired him as a Director [of the Rockefeller Foundation in New
York City, heading their new Department of Industrial Research. It paid $12,000
per year, compared to the meager $2,500 per year the Liberal Party was paying.

That big money five times his wage
increase I wonder what Rockefeller needed.

He worked for the Foundation until
1918, forming a close working association and friendship with Rockefeller,
advising him through the turbulent period of the 1914 strike and Ludlow
massacre at a family-owned coal company in Colorado, which subsequently set the
stage for a new era King became one of the earliest expert practitioners in the
emerging field of industrial relations.

Working for the Rockefellers
performing valuable service by helping to keep war-related industries running
smoothly

King expanded the Department of
External Affairs, founded in 1909, to further promote Canadian autonomy from
Britain.

Prior to this, Canada had relied on
British diplomats who owed their first loyalty to London.

King recruited many high-calibre
people for the new venture, including future Prime Minister Lester Pearson. This
project was a key element of his overall strategy, setting Canada on a course
independent of Britain.

In domestic affairs King strengthened
the Liberal policy of increasing the powers of the provincial governments by
transferring to the governments of Manitoba, Alberta, and Saskatchewan the
ownership of the crown lands within those provinces, as well as the subsoil
rights; these in particular would become increasingly important, as petroleum
and other natural resources proved very abundant.

NOTE: King new centralized power is
absolute power and absolute power corrupts.

The people who knew didn’t stop it
Paul Martin said he knew and he was Prime Minster of Canada, but he never stopped
it WHY?

Paul Martin was the Finance Minister
during the Chretien government November 4, 1993 - December 12, 2003

An intriguing secret overhangs the
federal election. Prime Minister Chretien
appeared to have everything in the bag, so utterly was his control of
information.

He knew exactly what had brought on
the financial bust of the late 1980s, and how the Private Banks had been bailed
out by enabling them to quadruple their holdings of federal government bonds by
being able to acquire them without putting up any of their own money. The
statutory reserves - were some 8% to 10% of the deposits the banks received in
their chequing accounts that had to be re-deposited on an interest-free basis with
the Bank of Canada.

Such reserves had been abolished in a
bill sneaked through parliament in 1991 without debate or press release.

When critics dug up the facts of that
bailout, the banks cried indignantly:
"It was an unjust tax on the banks!" But it was no tax at all.
From a "lender of the last resort", the government had simply moved
into the position of "the donor of the first resort".

Throughout the 1980s it had bailed
out bankrupt banks.

And since the government of Canada is
the sole shareholder of the Bank of Canada when it switched its borrowing from
its own bank the Bank of Canada to the distressed banks, they lent back to the
government some of the money it had bestowed on them as a gift.

And since the government of Canada is
the sole shareholder of the Bank of Canada when it switched its borrowing from
its own bank the Bank of Canada to the distressed banks, they lent back to the
government some of the money it had bestowed on them as a gift.

That was the secret of secrets, the
dead rat beneath our floor boards that poisoned the very air politicians
breathe.

Yet Canadians, who pay, ultimately
pay the shot in the GST every time they go into a store. They were the ones who
really bailed out our banks. The details have been withheld from the public,
but the total picture is revealed to them whenever they do a bit of shopping or
drive over the potholes in our roads, or suffer from the crumbling of our
infrastructure, to poverty and homeless people are the end results.

As further proof of his "fiscal
responsibility", he stashed away government revenue to "hide against
a rainy day". It was in fact the part cost of keeping the sun shining on our
banks' excursions into the US financial Wild West.

Not only were these incompatible with their
banking activities, but not particularly successful. They have already cost
them a small fortune.

But that was not enough, Mr. Martin
got himself into an awful row behind closed doors with the Auditor-General of
that day, Denis Desautels, on the government's practice of ignoring double
entry bookkeeping.

When it built a bridge, a school, or
a penitentiary, it wrote off the spending in a single year while keeping the
debt incurred on its books as a liability.

After weeks of wrangling a compromise
was reached in which this accrual accountancy (also known as `capital
budgeting') would be introduced with respect only to the aboriginal peoples'
accounts and the environment.

That resulted in the discovery of an
unrecognized surplus that he wore like a Purple Heart Cross.

Yet under the terms of his settlement
with the Auditor-General, the final balance sheets of the government would be
subject to approval by the Auditor-General. Until that approval is forthcoming,
Mr. Martin is as much in the dark about the government's balance-sheets as the
general public.

Accordingly it falls to the electorate to
decide whether he really has been a prudent administrator, or has just bullied
his auditor.

Could it be that in Canada we reward them with
10-year runs as head of state? That was
the grand illusion of Mr. Martin's career. The time has come to prove him
wrong.

But surely, all these things are far
too complicated for the ordinary elector to understand. Hence how did the public
pierce the mystery and grasp the essential fact that Mr. Martin has been up to
no great good.

Thus Roy MacGregor (The Globe &
Mail 7/06/04 ) sums up the situation" With voters putting the boots to
Martin so early, it means the public attention span has ample time to wander
over to those who might take his place. Two weeks ago the election was Paul
Martin's to lose, and it appears he lost it almost instantly; today, it is
Stephen Harper's to lose."

This adds up to a crisis of our
democratic system. The need for proportional representation, so that minority
groups at present unrepresented in parliament will be able to demand vital
information that is at present denied the major parties, or who simply fail to
fight for it. Being a major party involves a massive dependence on major
finances for TV ads, the attaches major parties to our banks with nose-rings.

How then did Mr. Martin's secret get
through to them despite its complexity that left Mr. Martin himself confused?

We pay them 160 million dollars a day
in interest

The answer is simple. There has been
a massive redistribution of the national income, and with the increasing
break-down of or our infrastructure and the ongoing voracity of our banks, it
continues, day and night.

Heather Scoffield ( The Tories'
$90-billion question" Globe and Mail 7/06) sums it up : "Both Tim
O'Neill, chief economist of the Bank of Montreal and Dale Orr, managing
director at Global Insight (Canada) recognize a scenario such as Conservatives
as a viable option, as long as spending is frozen. On the other hand, most
economists agree that keeping spending in check will involve cuts to some
programs."

That is the great secret that Mr.
Martin could only add to, but not hide

The last bailout of the Private Banks
was no one-shot affair, but an ongoing entitlement. When two of our major banks
have had fines imposed on them by the regulatory authorities in the US $80
million - quite apart from likely class actions for which they are setting
aside reserves - that comes out of the hides of Canadian taxpayers.

Vital information about Mr. Martin's
fiscal prudence comes to voters whenever they go into a store and pay the GST
that Mr. Martin as Liberal Finance Minister was supposed to do away with.

You can fool the public three times with
tales of self-aggrandizement, but the fourth time is a toughie these days.

“Once a nation parts with the control
of its currency and credit, it matters not who makes the nations laws. Usury,
once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of
currency and credit is restored to government and recognised as its most sacred
responsibility, all talk of the sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is
idle and futile.

― William Lyon Mackenzie King

How Ironic King is now on the 50 dollar
Canadian Bill when he was so against Private Banks. It’s not a Canadian bill;
it’s a private bank bill with wording that says Canadian.

Andrew Jackson - As a military officer he virtually acquired
Florida by force of arms from Spain and defended New Orleans against the
British. As President he fought the rewarding of government positions to party
loyalists, paid of the US Debt and he abolished the Private Banking system from
the US and established the position that an individual state could not nullify
the laws of the land. He was a strong and competent President, but his
treatment of the Native Americans was shameful.

If congress has the right under the
Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use themselves, not to
be delegated to individuals or corporations. -Andrew Jackson

If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of their
currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive
the people of all property until their
children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered…. The
issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to
whom it properly belongs. – Thomas Jefferson in the debate over the Re-charter
of the Bank Bill (1809)“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous
to our liberties than standing armies.” – Thomas Jefferson

History records that the money
changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means
possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and
its issuance. -James Madison

President Jackson- ATTEMPTED
ASSASINATED

Rothschild’s had lost a fierce battle
with President Jackson with regard to keeping their Central Bank. For in 1834,
Jackson removed all government deposits from the Rothschild’s “Second Bank in
the United States.”

President William McKinley
ASSASINATED

A new System of National Banks was
established in 1862 eliminating the Central Bank up through 1901. It was on
September 6 1901 that President William McKinley was assassinated through the
intrigues of the Rothschild’s and their hit-men.

With McKinley out of the way, the
path to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was easily paved through of the House
of Rothschild.

President William McKinley was known
as a “hard money” man. This was because he advocated a gold standard. McKinley
was against “easy money” with no backing — printed by lenders at interest to
the borrower - namely the US government.

This was the essence of McKinley’s
1896 & 1900 successful campaign

Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt had been
groomed by the powerful Rothschild’s political machine to be the Governor of NY
and future President of the United States. In 1900, McKinley was forced by
Republican partisans to appoint “Teddy” Roosevelt as Vice President to get the
“Jewish vote.” McKinley’s appointment of Roosevelt soon turned out to be his
demise.

The Government should create, issue,
and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power
of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these
principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will
cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. -Abraham Lincoln.

Issue of currency should be lodged
with the government and be protected from domination by Wall Street. We are
opposed to…provision [which] would place our currency and credit system in
private hands. – Theodore Roosevelt

Despite these warnings, Woodrow
Wilson signed the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. A few years later he wrote: I am a
most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial
nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated.
The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of
a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated
Governments in the civilized world no longer a
Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the
vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small
group of dominant men. -Woodrow Wilson.

Years later, reflecting on the major
banks’ control in Washington, President Franklin Roosevelt paid this indirect
praise to his distant predecessor President Andrew Jackson, who had “killed”
the 2nd Bank of the US (an earlier type of the Federal Reserve System). After
Jackson’s administration the bankers’ influence was gradually restored and
increased, culminating in the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
Roosevelt knew this history.

(In a letter to Colonel House, dated
November 21, 1933)

The real truth of the matter is, as
you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the
government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson… -Franklin D. Roosevelt

(In a letter to Colonel House, dated
November 21, 1933)

When a government is dependent upon
bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the
situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no
motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole
object is gain.” – Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France, 1815

“The death of Lincoln was a disaster
for Christendom. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his
boots and the bankers went anew to grab the riches. I fear that foreign bankers
with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant
riches of America and use it to systematically corrupt civilization.” Otto von
Bismark (1815-1898), German Chancellor, after the Lincoln assassination

Mayer Amschel Rothschild

“Let me issue and control a nation’s
money and I care not who writes the laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild
(1744-1812), founder of the House of Rothschild.

“The few who understand the system
will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours
that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the
great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous
advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without
complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to
their interests.” The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in
New York, 1863.

It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with
creating "revenue" or raising money to build roads and schools. That
is a total delusion played off by both Republicans and Democrats to prevent
people from realizing the far more powerful truth that federal income taxes
aren't necessary at all.

John F Kennedy
vs. The Federal Reserve

On June 4, 1963, President John F.
Kennedy signed Executive Order (EO) 11110 to compel the U.S. Treasury to issue
paper certificates backed by silver held by the Treasury. The certificates
directly challenged the authority of the Federal Reserve Bank to
"loan" fiat (unbacked) money to the United States government at
interest.

Executive Order 11110

AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO.
10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING
THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by
section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289
of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at
the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The
authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of
May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates
against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury
not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to
prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard
silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and
(b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.

SECTION 2. The amendment made by this
Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any
suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the
date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced
as if said amendments had not been made.

JOHN F. KENNEDY, THE WHITE HOUSE,
June 4, 1963

John F Kennedy – ASSASINATED

On June 4, 1963, President Kennedy
signed Executive Order 11110. The order could have—and should have—begun the
process of ending the Federal Reserve money monopoly in America. Instead,
President Kennedy was assassinated and a few months later the silver
certificates he ordered into circulation were removed.

One thing is for certain: Fiat money
cannot compete with real money. Had President Kennedy and the silver certificates
survived, the Federal Reserve would have been out of business

Just some History for those who
attempt to stop the Private banking Cartel what happens

So now back to Canada.

Prime Minister R.B. Bennett called
for a Royal Commission in 1933, and it reported in favor of a Central Bank. The
Bank began operations on March 11, 1935, after the passage of the Bank of
Canada Act.

Initially the Bank was founded as a
privately owned corporation in order to ensure it was free from political
influence.

In 1938, under Prime Minister William Lyon
Mackenzie King, it became a Crown Corporation, fully owned by the government
with the Governor appointed by Cabinet.

The responsibility for creating small
bills was transferred from the Finance Department to the Bank of Canada and the
private banks were ordered to remove their currency from circulation by 1945.

The Bank of Canada played an
important role in financing Canada's war effort during World War II. After the
war, the Bank's role was expanded as it was mandated to encourage economic
growth in Canada.

The subsidiary Industrial Development
Bank was formed to stimulate investment in Canadian businesses.

The monetary policy of the Bank was
geared towards low interest rates and full employment with little concern about
inflation. When inflation began to raise in the early 1960s, the Governor,
James Coyne ordered a reduction in the money supply.

Now we see the change to our Bank of
Canada coming slowly being re –rooted in stealth.

Prime Minister John Diefenbaker
disagreed with this move, and ordered a return to full employment policies.

This caused a brief crisis because
the Bank was supposed to be an arm’s length organization, not under political
control.

Coyne resigned, and was replaced by
Louis Rasminsky.

Louis Rasminsky, Governor of the Bank
of Canada from 1961 to 1973, succeeding James Coyne He was succeeded by Gerald
Bouey.

NOTE: 1974 Bank of Canada stopped its
Primary Role changed during Gerald

Bouey was Governor of Bank of Canada.

Prime Minister: Pierre Trudeau

Minister of Finance: John Turner

Governor of the Bank of Canada:
Gerald Bouey

Gerald Keith Bouey, was the fourth
Governor of the Bank of Canada from 1973 to 1987

In 1948 Bouey joined the Bank of
Canada Research Department and became Assistant Chief in 1953, Deputy Chief in
1956 and Chief of Research in 1962. Bouey became Advisor to the Governor in
1965, Deputy Governor in 1969 and Governor in 1973.

In 1981, he was made an Officer of the Order
of Canada and promoted to Companion in 1987.

During his role as Prime Minister Trudeau and former
Governor of the Bank of Canada Gerald Bouey removed control of Canada's
currency by allowing private banks to secretly control and print the public's
money into existence rather than borrowing it at Zero percent interest.

NOTE: “In 1867 Canada’s debt was $94
million and it grew slowly until 1915, when WWI pushed the figure to $2.4
billion.

During the Great Depression the debt
rose to $5 billion, and by the end of WWII it had reached $18 billion.”

There was a small administrative fee,
interest on bonds, but for purposes of this illustration, there was virtually
zero interest. We were borrowing money from ourselves. $100 borrowed @ 0
interest is $100.

All these Prime Ministers, Finance
Minister, and every political party are the same. They may use different names
or be a liberal, of Conservative but all on the same agenda. They removed our
Bank of Canada deliberately and creating mass debt. Is this a crime YES?

LIBERALS – CONSERVATVES ARE TO CLOSE
TO THE BANKS

These are slow steps year after year
to enslave the Canadian people.

Canada’s deficit isn’t a problem of
over-spending or having too many programs, it is a problem of paying compound
interest to this Private Corporation. (Private Banks)

Private Banks create money by putting
an amount in the ledger (out of thin air). So far, public/private banks do the
same. Private Banks, however, charge compound interest.

For those who need a math refresher,
compound interest means that interest is charged on the principal plus the
interest so far accrued, ad infinitum.
So, $100 borrowed @ 3% interest becomes $103, $103 becomes $107, $107
becomes $110.21, $110.21 becomes
$113.50. And so on and son and so on. (Some numbers rounded.)

You get the idea – a runaway train
taking taxpayers’ money and transferring it via interest to the banksters.

This is wealth re-distribution on a
monumental, unfathomable scale. And
people get upset at governments for paying $610 a month to the disabled, sick,
or injured

Canadian citizens! Who is
actually Hah! Chump change!

I've read and watched a few versions
of who did what but whether it was
pressure from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, or
the bankster cabal, the upshot is, in 1973/74, then Governor of the Bank of
Canada, Gerald Bouey, seems to have made
the decision by himself to start borrowing on behalf of Canada from private
banks.

NOTE: Impossible for one man to do
this. This was well orchestrated in stealth,

According to the Honourable Paul
Hellyer, who asked Pierre Trudeau’s biographer, there is no record of Trudeau
himself, or the government of the day making this monumentally damaging
decision! One unelected man did this!!

Now I find this hard to believe
myself. We can’t ask Gerald Bouey as he died February 6, 2004.

How has this damaged Canada? Let me
count the ways.

When we pay interest on interest on
interest, we grow the amount of debt, which for governments is called
deficit. Unlike a mortgage, where the
interest portion of the monthly payment decreases as the principal is paid
down, the deficit rises because of the increase, not just in borrowing, but in
compound interest on the total.

Without continually raising taxes,
there becomes less and less money for governments to do anything in terms of
programs, infrastructure, MP’s salaries and pensions, foreign aid, etc.

So governments keep borrowing and
borrowing and borrowing. Giving tax cuts
to corporations and the wealthiest citizens just takes more money out of
government revenue, so more borrowing must be done.

Canada’s deficit isn’t a problem of
over-spending or having too many programs, it is a problem of paying compound
interest to banksters.

You can easily understand now, why we
don’t have a healthcare crisis, we have an interest-paying crisis, affecting
our healthcare and all program funding.

If this sounds too simple, it isn’t.
It seems hard to get one’s head around because unnecessarily borrowing at
interest is so obviously stupid and against a country’s best interests.

NOTE: Yet as recently as the 2001
Ontario budget, James Flaherty, as Minister of Finance for Ontario “sold” the
91 year old Province of Ontario Savings
Office to a private bank.

It actually made a profit, and the
Province could get loans at better rates than from private banks. Reason
given? To end “wasteful activities that
could be eliminated”. Baloney! It made a
profit of $10 Million!

These people are committing fraud and
need to be arrested.

This is the stated “reason” for all
the cuts. It’s called “starving the
beast”: drive up the deficit to show the need for cuts later. It’s akin to
ripping up your clothes to justify getting new ones, only backwards.

The deficit could be stopped in its
tracks right now, if Canada would start borrowing from the Bank of Canada
instead of private banks. Yes.

Unfortunately we, and almost all, if
not all nations, have a Goldman Sachs man in place. Ours is Governor of the
Bank of Canada, Mark Carney. He was on the guest list of the Bilderberg meeting
in June 2012.

There were a few other Canadians on
the list, including Alberta’s Alison Redford. I’ll put a link to Bilderberg
info for those who don’t know about this annual secret meeting of CEOS,
Governments, banking, media moguls, industry leaders and US Presidential
hopefuls!

It is thought to be working towards a
one world government. Think Globalized industry & finance making global
laws. The Trans Pacific Partnership gets us well on the way there, according to
leaked documents.

All Major Canadian Parties are owned
and bought and paid for, with the possible exception of the Green party, since
Elizabeth May understands this theft, perpetuate this bank theft from our
citizens.

Every Premier has been so far
assimilated into the corporatist corrupt system!

Not one knows how to create jobs, but they
sure can sell us all out for their piece of the pie.

We know where PM Harper and Minister
Flaherty stand.

There is a link below to a
conversation about it with the NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair.

The only man in recent times who
wanted to use the public bank was Bob Rae when he was Ontario’s Premier, and he
was told he couldn't.

That’s why he couldn't fulfill some
of his election promises and had to take other steps, such as the infamous Rae
days. Blame the banksters.

Bank interest is what is behind the
austerity programs in Canada, European Union, Britain and the US

The people are suffering in order to
pay the banksters!

Yet any country can have a publicly owned
bank. It only takes the political will to set one up.

And Canada had done this for the past
for 75 years but has since stopped.

Because of the changes to the Bank of
Canada in 1974 our national debt has skyrocketed from 21.6 billion to nearly
588 billion in 3 years

Some information of James Elliott
Coyne, Governor of the Bank of Canada, from 1955 to 1961, During his time in
office, he had a much-publicized debate with Prime Minister John Diefenbaker, a
debate often referred to as the "Coyne Affair" (or sometimes the
"Coyne Crisis"), which led to his resignation.

NOTE: Before Bank of Canada Governor
Mark Carney, there was James Coyne.

Beginning in the late 1950s, Mr.
Coyne set in motion a chain of events that would eventually allow his
successors to comfortably range beyond the confines of interest-rate setting.

What these individuals did is
treason.

In Canada, the central bank’s
arm’s-length relationship with cabinet will be linked forever to Mr. Coyne, who
engaged in a public war of wills with the government of John Diefenbaker,
culminating in the Bank of Canada governor’s resignation in 1961.

The incident became known as the
“Coyne Affair,” a traumatic event that roiled financial markets, embarrassed
the government and wounded morale at the Bank of Canada.

But in the fallout, Mr. Diefenbaker
accepted that the Bank of Canada should have a clear mandate to operate without
day-to-day interference from government.

Possibly the greatest thing James Coyne did
was to spark the crisis

The capsule history of Mr. Coyne’s
fight with Mr. Diefenbaker characterizes the incident as a battle between a
principled central banker who wanted to guard against inflation, and a prime
minister who wanted to stoke a lacklustre economy.

(With strict austerity
policies or not be diverted from his austerity programme)

Conservative - Richard Bedford
Bennett,. He served as the 11th Prime Minister of Canada from August 7, 1930,
to October 23, 1935, during the worst of the Great Depression years.

Following his defeat as Prime
Minister, Bennett moved to England, and was elevated to the peerage as Viscount
Bennett.

Do you remember Premier Gordon
Campbell who sold BC out and then shipped to Europe as a Canadian Ambassador?

NOTE: Gordon had to resign because of
fraud and Christy Clark unelected became Premier of BC and she is selling BC
out also.

Some important friendships

One day, while Bennett was crossing
the Miramichi River on the ferry boat, This was the beginning of an improbable
but important friendship with Max Aitken, later the industrialist and British
press baron, Lord Beaverbrook.

This friendship would become
important to his success later in life, as would his friendship with the
Chatham lawyer, Lemuel J. Tweedie, a prominent

Conservative politician.

Another important friendship was with
the prominent Shirreff family of Chatham, the father being High Sheriff of
Northumberland County for 25 years. The son, Harry, joined the E.B. Eddy
Company, a large pulp and paper company.

Their friendship was crucial to his
later life when Jennie Shirreff married the head of the Eddy Company. She later
made Bennett the lawyer for her extensive interests.

He was already negotiating with Sir
James Lougheed to move to Calgary and become his law partner. Lougheed was
Calgary's richest man.

Bennett moved to Alberta in 1897. In
1908 he was one of five people appointed to the first Library Board for the
city of Calgary

Before Bennett became Prime Minister
he was already being groomed by the most financial men in Canada. In 1910,
Bennett became a director of Calgary

Power Ltd. (now formally TransAlta
Corporation) and just a year later he became the President. During his
leadership projects completed included the first storage reservoir at Lake
Minnewanka, a second transmission line to Calgary and the construction of the
Kananaskis Falls hydro station. At that time, he was also director of Rocky
Mountains Cement Company and Security Trust.

In 1905, when Alberta was carved out
of the territories and made a province, Bennett became the first leader of the
Alberta Conservative Party. In 1909, he won a seat in the provincial
legislature, before switching to federal politics.

Liberal - Louis Stephen St. Laurent,
12th Prime Minister of Canada, from 15 November 1948 to 21 June 1957.

I find this interesting

He became one of Quebec's leading
lawyers and was so highly regarded that he was offered a position in the
Cabinet of the Conservative Prime Minister Arthur Meighen

It was not until he was nearly 60
that St-Laurent finally agreed to enter politics when Liberal Prime Minister
William Lyon Mackenzie King appealed to his sense of duty in late 1941

William Lyon Mackenzie King and the
Liberal party felt there was no man better qualified to succeed as Prime
Minister. St. Laurent was persuaded to stand as a candidate at the leadership
convention in August 1948, which he won.

Conservative - John George
Diefenbaker, 13th Prime Minister of Canada, serving from June 21, 1957, during
his six years as Prime Minister, his government obtained passage of the
Canadian Bill of Rights and granted the vote to the First Nations and Inuit
peoples.

The Bomarc Missile Program was highly
controversial in Canada. John

Diefenbaker initially agreed to deploy the missiles, and shortly thereafter
controversially scrapped the Avro Arrow, a supersonic manned interceptor
aircraft, arguing that the missile program made the Arrow unnecessary

Now we have an idea why it was
scrapped, still many unanswered questions here. I lean towards corruption.

Initially, it was unclear whether the
missiles would be equipped with nuclear warheads. By 1960 it became known that
the missiles were to have a nuclear payload, and a debate ensued about whether
Canada should accept nuclear weapons. Ultimately, the Diefenbaker government
decided that the Bomarcs should not be equipped with nuclear warheads. The
dispute split the Diefenbaker Cabinet, and led to the collapse of the
government in 1963

Liberal - Lester Bowles
"Mike" Pearson He was the 14th Prime Minister of Canada from 22 April
1963 to 20 April 1968.

Chrétien worked his way up to
parliamentary secretary to Prime Minister Pearson.

But how did he get into cabinet and
became Finance Minister?

Well here it is Lester Pearson's
great ambition in life was to be a professional baseball player," Chrétien
recalls. "In those days, we had an annual softball game between the MPs
and the Parliamentary Press Gallery. I pitched for the MPs' team. Pearson was
the manager. We won the game. And that was the day I earned my seat in the
cabinet.

Jean Chrétien "I didn't want my
first vote to be against my party," Chrétien recalled. "But I had
committed during the campaign to vote against [the missile installation] unless
there was proof we'd agreed to it."

Fifty years later, Chrétien fesses up
on how he ended up voting with the Liberal government.

"They showed me some secret
cabinet documents," he told the conference. "I couldn't speak much
English and couldn't understand what I was reading, but they told me, 'Here's
the commitment in writing.' So I voted
with the government."

This is how it works ONE BOSS, and do
as your told, no independent thought do as the Party Boss says.

Liberal Party - Joseph Philippe
Pierre Yves Elliott Trudeau, usually known as Pierre Trudeau or Pierre Elliott
Trudeau, was the 15th Prime Minister of Canada from April 20, 1968 to June 4,
1979. So this happened while he was Prime Minister.

Now who was he working for that’s the
question sure not the good of the country

Major disastrous economic reforms, such
as:

Canada - US Free Trade Deal – which
has

NAFTA: Manufacturing job loss in
Canada

Mulroney was another prime minister
of Canada who was a threat to Canadian nationhood also ran up 300 billion
dollars of new debt.

NAFTA, massive corporate tax cuts and
do-nothing industrial policies promoted by Ottawa are destroying Canada’s
manufacturing sector - this at a time when corporate profits are at an all time
high. Free trade policies have hurt both Canadian workers and workers in poorer
countries.

• Resistance built and support
plummeted as a deal done in the dark came into the light. Another blunder and
millions of TAX dollars wasted

Charlottetown Accord

Another blunder and millions of TAX dollars
wasted

The
judge said he could not accept Mulroney’s testimony that his acceptance of at
least $300,000 in cash was an error in judgment. Rather, it was an attempt to
hide the transactions and cost the Canadian tax payers millions because they
called him a crook. He sued Canada well you the tax payer.

Liberal leader Jean Chretien defeated
her in the election mostly because of the corruption of Brian Mulroney and
policies such as NAFTA, Charlottetown Accord, GST, Charlottetown Accord, Gun
control all were found negative for the future of Canada.

The results of this election wiped
the Conservatives out of government. As the results began to come in on
election night, the vote for the Liberals became a landslide. The final results
were Liberals - 177 seats, Bloc = 54 seats, Reform Party 52 seats, NDP 9 seats,
Progressive Conservatives 2 seats and others

Liberal Party - Joseph Philippe
Pierre Yves Elliott Trudeau returned March 3, 1980 to June 30, 1984 as Prime
Minister.

Now here is something to consider and
do some research your selves.

NOTE: Prime Minister: Pierre Trudeau
appointed John Turner Minister of Finance: Governor of the Bank of Canada:

Pierre Elliott Trudeau stepped down
June 4, 1979. This is important!

John Napier Wyndham Turner, 17th
Prime Minister of Canada from June 30, 1984 to September 17, 1984.

What happened from June 4, 1979 to
June 30, 1979 in these 26 days?

We know for 75 years we were involved
in two world wars, built TransCanada

Highway from east to west or vise versa,
infrastructure, EI, pension’s funds, Top of the world Health care and only had
a debt of 21.6 Billion dollars.

Turner held the office of Prime
Minister for 79 days (the second shortest tenure in Canadian history after
Charles Tupper), as he dissolved Parliament immediately after being sworn in as
Prime Minister.

Connecting the DOTS

He then flew over to see the Queen;
something does not sit well with this.

So why would he have to fly over to
see the Queen, well here is what most Canadians think that Canada is an
independent country. Well it’s not

What powers does the Queen have?

The Queen has the right to rule: the
people are not citizens, but subjects of the monarch. Most public servants must
swear an oath of loyalty, or make an affirmation of their loyalty, to the
crown.

The Canadian Oath of Allegiance is a
promise or declaration of fealty to the

Canadian monarch, taken, along with
other specific oaths of office, by new occupants of various federal and
provincial government offices, members of federal, provincial, and municipal
police forces, military of the Canadian Forces and, in some provinces, all
lawyers upon admission to the bar. The Oath of Allegiance also makes up the
first portion of the Oath of Citizenship, the taking of which is a requirement
of obtaining Canadian citizenship.

The Queen has the right to be
consulted and to "advise and warn" ministers.

Otherwise her residual
powers - the "royal prerogative" - are mostly exercised through the
government of the day. These include the power to enact legislation, to award
honours (on the advice of the prime minister), to sign treaties and to declare
war.

But royal prerogative is the subject
of controversy, because it confers on governments the power to make major
decisions without recourse to parliament.

When Edward Heath brought Britain
into the EEC in 1972, parliament was not consulted until afterwards. Similarly,
Margaret Thatcher used royal prerogative to go to war in the Falklands in 1982.

In Canada Apr 3, 2011 - Queen
dissolves Canadian Parliament for third time in 3 years for – Canadian Prime
Minister Stephen Harper.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper will visit the Governor
General today to dissolve Parliament, setting the stage for a federal election
in early May.

The Harper government was defeated in the House of
Commons on Friday on a non-confidence motion declaring the government in
contempt of Parliament.

It is the first time in Canadian history that a
government has been found in contempt.

For those in denial of the Queen’s
power over her colony-states, here are previous occurrences:

Canadian Harper
PM wins suspension of
Parliament

The Queen has two individual powers
that could cause a political crisis if they were ever exercised. She may refuse
a government's request to dissolve parliament and call an election, if she
believes a government can legitimately be formed. She also has the right to
choose the prime minister: a formality in the case of a clear majority, but
potentially controversial after an inconclusive

In his political career, Turner held
several prominent Cabinet posts, including ----

---Minister of Justice and Minister
of Finance, under Prime Minister Pierre

Trudeau from 1968 to June 4, 1979. So
he was involved in the Bank of Canada

Remember 1974 Bank of Canada was removed,
we had 21.6 billion dollar debt to ourselves, and in 1997 just 3 short years’
later Canadian citizens were in debt to a private bank of a tune of 588
billion, WHAT HAPPENED?

If you got money you can get away
with Murder or get away with anything you want that’s our system they created
for us. It’s the law that taught us this. Go ahead and break the law if you
have money or write the law yourself if you have money.

Montreal Police were told to increase
tickets from 18 a day to 28. This is just a tax grab.

Now with Canada going into recession
or possible a depression and the prospect of having to implement the unpopular
wage and price controls, Turner surprisingly resigned his position as Prime
Mister of Canada from June 4, 1979 to June 30, 1974 in only 26 days.

So from 1974- 1977 Canada debt went
from $21.6 billion to 588 billion in three short years

NOTE: John Turner was made Minister
of Justice, which was the position that Trudeau had held before becoming Prime
Minister and while in that position

Trudeau and the Liberals won the 74 election
by opposing wage and price controls, but once in power, Trudeau switched horses
and decided to bring them in.

Turner under growing pressure in his
position as Finance Minister and with no other interesting options available to
him decided to leave politics and in 1979

In 1979 the Liberals were defeated
and Trudeau stepped down. Turner was asked to run for the leadership but seeing
the fortunes of the party at low ebb and a potentially a long hard battle to
rebuild it at hand, he decided against it.

Through the twists of political fate,
Joe Clark was defeated during a vote of confidence, Trudeau returned as leader
and the Liberals won another majority mandate.

After a hiatus from politics from
1975 to 1984, Turner returned and successfully contested the Liberal
leadership. Turner held the office of Prime Minister for 79 days (the second
shortest tenure in Canadian history after Charles Tupper), as he dissolved
Parliament immediately after being sworn in as Prime Minister.

Why did he dissolve Parliament?

Then he calls an election and then
went on to lose the 1984 election in a landslide to Conservative Martin Brian
Mulroney September 17, 1984 - June 25, 1993. But I will go into more detail on
this later.

John Turner was also saddled with the
negative issues of the Trudeau years and the desire by many for a change. One
of the main issues of the election was some patronage appointments which were
made and which he approved of which although traditional and in line with past
practices and standards, did not go down well with the electorate.

The Conservatives jumped on these
appointments and made them into a banner of corrupt Liberal practices. Turner
and the Liberals were badly beaten.

From the late 1960s until the
mid-1980s, he dominated the Canadian political scene and was appointed as
Lester Pearson's Parliamentary Secretary, and later became his Minister of
Justice and Minister of Finance

Liberal Party - Lester Bowles
"Mike" Pearson was the 14th Prime Minister of Canada from 22 April
1963 to 20 April 1968, as the head of two back-to Liberal Governments in 1963
and 1965

John Napier Wyndham Turner 17th Prime
Minister of Canada from June 30 to September 17, 1984.

In his political career, Turner held
several prominent Cabinet posts, including Minister of Justice and Minister of
Finance, under Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau from 1968 to 1975.

Isn't that convenient he returned the
same favour Lester Pearson did for him and did they same exact thing for John
Napier he was appointed Minister of Justice and Minister of Finance

NOTE: Prime Minister: Pierre Trudeau
Minister of Finance: John Turner Governor of the Bank of Canada:

Amid a world recession and the
prospect of having to implement the unpopular wage and price controls, Turner
surprisingly resigned his position in 1975. After a hiatus from politics from
1975 to 1984, Turner returned and successfully contested the Liberal
leadership.

Why did he contest the Liberal
Leadership? I have my opinion.

Turner held the office of Prime
Minister for 79 days (the second shortest tenure in Canadian history after
Charles Tupper), as he dissolved Parliament immediately after being sworn in as
Prime Minister, and went on to lose the 1984 election in a landslide.

Turner stayed on as Liberal leader
and headed the Official Opposition for the next six years, leading his party to
a modest recovery in the 1988 campaign, resigning from politics in 1990.

1984, and John Turner succeeded him
as Prime Minister.

Admirers praise the force of
Trudeau's intellect and salute his political acumen in preserving national
unity against the Quebec sovereignty movement, suppressing a violent revolt,
and establishing the Charter of Rights and Freedoms within Canada's constitution.
Critics accuse him of arrogance, economic mismanagement, and unduly favouring
the federal government relative to the provinces, especially in trying to
distribute the oil wealth of the Prairies.

Liberal - Paul Edgar Philippe Martin
also known as Paul Martin, Jr. was the 21st Prime Minister of Canada.

Martin served as the Member of
Parliament from 1988 election to his retirement in 2008.

Now we have Harper and let’s take a
good look at what he has done or not done for Canada, by far he has to be the
worst Prime Minister in our history of Canada.

NOTE: Bank of Canada is still the
Number one fraud, but Harper also well aware of this fraud of the bank of
Canada still continues to put many more nails in to the Canadian coffin than any
other Prime Minster.

His Policies will shock you if you
have not paid attention. I also will understand as the main Media in Canada has
not informed most Canadians of his dealing.

THE NEW CANADA UNDER STEVEN HARPER

Conservative -Stephen Harper Prime
Minister is the 22nd and current Prime Minister of Canada .Harper became Prime
Minister in 2006, forming a minority government after the 2006 election.

Harper with a power base in Alberta
and home of Canada's oil boom, Known as an ally of Canadian fossil fuels, has
promoted their export to the U.S. and China.

Environment

Harper dismantled many environmental
restrictions on economic growth.

Canada has become an international
laggard in environmental policy and practice is now an incontrovertible fact.

In 2009, the Conference Board of
Canada ranked Canada 15th out of 17 wealthy industrialized nations on
environmental performance. In 2010, researchers at Simon Fraser University
ranked Canada 24th out of 25 OECD nations on environmental performance.

Not one of the bills introduced in
the current session is intended to improve Canada’s environmental record.
Instead, environmental laws are being weakened to expedite industrial
development. Standards are being relaxed to meet industry’s demands.

Military-Industrial Complex

Harper increased federal defense
spending by nearly $1 billion annually in his first four years in office, with
more projected. The new Canada is a place where militarism is given pride of
place over peacemaking.

The blending of sport and the
military, with the government as the marching band, is part of the new
nationalism the Conservatives are trying to instil. It is another example of
how the state, under Stephen Harper's governance, is becoming all-intrusive.
... State controls are now at a highpoint in our modern history. There is every
indication they will extend further

Harper sells out Canada

To be blunt, Canadians have not spent
years reducing the ownership of sectors of the economy by our own governments,
only to see them bought and controlled by foreign governments instead $15
billion takeover of Canada’s Nexen oil and gas giant by the China National
Offshore Oil Corporation.

Used his newly appointed Senate (full
of conservative politicians unable to get elected in their own ridings), to
kill a climate bill that had already passed the house (presumably at the behest
of his key sponsor, the Alberta oil-sands companies).

Showed a decided partisan bias during
stimulus spending, in which 60% of stimulus money was spent in conservative
ridings (when only 46% of ridings were conservative; leaving the other 54%
percent to split the remaining 40% of the money)

Used $50 million of a G8 legacy fund
to pay for projects in Tony Clement’s riding of Muskoka/Parry Sound, despite
the bulk of the projects having NOTHING to do with the G8/G20 and being, in
some cases, 100 km away from any of the summit sites (all of this without the
approval of parliament).

Reduced the number of ridings and
representatives in Ontario by about 25%.

Set up the permanent voter’s list
which helped disenfranchise enough students and tenants to help them to squeak
to a second “majority” with less than 10,000 votes province-wide in 9 ridings
and only 45% of the popular vote despite a citizens’ campaign for “strategic
voting” to defeat the government.

Did not investigate the “Bev Oda”
scandal, in which one of his own ministers pencilled in a “not” that denied
federal funding to an international aid organization, and then lied about it.

Misrepresented a quote from auditor
general Sheila Fraser to make it sound like she supported the Harper
Government’s handling of the G8 monies (she was in fact referring to the
Liberal handling of the 9/11 relief fund…)

Okay, so I think the above is a good
start but I think they sum a lot of the above up nicely. I will add to this post as I go on…

Harper promised open accountable
government, Harper has lead one of the most secretive, authoritarian
governments in Canadian history.

Stephen Harper has reshaped Canada in
two years:

Two years of Harper government have
brought profound changes to Canada, and some may be hard to undo. Not everyone
is celebrating Canada’s birthday this year.

Most are getting ready the funeral of
Canada.

Stephen Harper’s Conservatives have
reshaped much of this country in 24 short months.

From the environment, to health care,
to foreign policy, this is a different Canada than it was May 2, 2011, and many
of the Harper initiatives may not be easily undone by future governments, or
even future leaders of a Conservative government

The two-year-old government has cut
scientific research, muzzled its scientists, put limits on the independence of
Statistics Canada and is facing charges that it plans to wield more influence
over the CBC..

But some of the biggest changes in
two years under the Harper government have been our place in the world.

What's happening here: There is a
"lack of sense of inner self-restraint on the part of the prime minister,
a sense that it is some kind of war and therefore anything is legitimate, that
it's quite acceptable for a prime minister to lie.

Prorogued Parliament (three!) to
cover up/interrupt investigations into misconduct in his cabinet

The Canadian Parliament was dissolved
in March 2011, after his government failed a no-confidence vote on the issue of
the Cabinet being in contempt of parliament.

American TV
political commentator Rachel Maddow shares her thoughts on Harper’s political
machinations

Harper has made Canada the laughing stock of the
world [video]

In behaving more like would be third-world dictator
rather than like the leader of an industrialized nation, Stephen Harper has
made Canada (rightly) the laughing stock of the world.

Now back to Bank of Canada has
amassed a federal debt over $600 billion by mid-2013

Prime Minister: Pierre Trudeau

Minister of Finance: John Turner

Governor of the Bank of Canada:
Gerald Bouey

Because of the changes to the Bank of
Canada in 1974 our national debt has skyrocketed from 21.6 billion to nearly
600 billion.

Which are owed to private banks like
CIBC, TD Bank, the Royal bank, and Scotia banks and every one of these banks
have Bilderberg association.

And secondly, what was the reasoning
for the change in policy?

Pierre Elliot Trudeau, like many
other Canadian Prime Ministers attended the Bilderberg group meetings before
being elected.

Trudeau also served in the mid-1990s
on Power Corp.’s international advisory board. Also Paul Martin

Paul Desmarais financed Paul Martin
Political career

Gerald Bouey was a member of David
Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission. Rockefeller is also a chairman of the
Bilderberg group.

Both the trilateral commission and
Bilderberg g group are very well known for promoting a global government or
what others have called a “new world order”.

“Some even believe we (the
Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best
interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’
and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated
global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the
charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

- David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page
405

David Rockefeller Sept. 23, 1994
“This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and
interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long — we
are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major
crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

With every day that passes a global
economic collapse seems to be only a matter of time.

Mainly due to the massive amounts of
debt we are forced to pay unlawfully.

Could this be the right major crisis
that he spoke of?

The change in policy came, to help
the Canadian economy recover from what the government billed as a major
recession. When in reality the recession was small at best. Well it has and
they succeeded to enslave US all.

Former Prime Minister - John Turner
said the most powerful business man sit behind secret meeting to sell out
Canadian sovereignty

While Paul Martin was doing a
presentation a student asked him about the Bilderberg group and he replied if
this student asks anymore such question he would leave. In the video Oh Canada
our Bought and Sold land you can see this in the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbACCGf6q-c

From readers
Digest

Reader
Digest what it should have said

The history of Canada’s federal debt;
obviously something went terribly wrong after 1974. Over a 108 year period
(1867-1974) the accumulated debt shows as nearly a flat line growing to only
$21.6 billion. But around 1974, the debt began to grow exponentially

So, what happened around 1974? In
that year

To achieve that goal, the Committee
discouraged borrowing from a nation’s own central bank interest-free and
encouraged borrowing from private creditors

The Basel Committee was established
by the central-bank Governors of the Group of Ten countries of the member
central banks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), which included
Canada.

A key objective of the Committee was
and is to maintain “monetary and financial stability.”To achieve that goal, the
Committee discouraged borrowing from a nation’s own central bank interest-free
and encouraged borrowing from private creditors, all in the name of
“maintaining the stability of the currency.”

The presumption was that borrowing
from a central bank with the power to create money on its books would inflate
the money supply and prices. Borrowing from private creditors, on the other
hand, was considered not to be inflationary, since it involved the recycling of
pre-existing money.

What the bankers did not reveal,
although they had long known it themselves, was that private banks create the
money they lend just as public banks do. The difference is simply that a
publicly-owned bank returns the interest to the government and the community,
while a privately-owned bank siphons the interest into its capital account, to
be re-invested at further interest, progressively drawing money out of the
productive economy.

Lobbying by the banks and adoption of
monetarism — the idea that “markets know best” and should be without
regulation, and that public services should be privatized — took hold.

So, around 1974, the Government of
Canada began to borrow all of the monies to cover its shortfalls from the
private sector at interest rather than creating money through the Bank of
Canada interest-free. In other words, since 1974, the Bank of Canada has not
been acting in the best interest of its shareholders: the people of Canada.

To understand how ridiculous the
present situation is, consider the 1993 Auditor General of Canada report
(Section 5.41)3 which states:

NOTE: Of this, $37 billion represents
the accumulated shortfall in meeting the cost of government programs since
Confederation. The remainder, $386 billion, represents the amount the
government has borrowed to service the debt created by previous annual
shortfalls.

In other words, of the accumulated
debt of $423 billion, the government really needed to borrow only $37
billion—accumulated over 127 years—to cover its shortfalls on real spending for
goods and services.

The rest of that accumulated debt was
monies borrowed to service the debt, essentially a payment of interest on
interest to the private sector when the government could have created the money
to cover the shortfall at what amounts to be no interest.

In 2011, alone, Canadian taxpayers
paid the private banks an estimated $37.7 billion to service the federal debt

From 1974–1975 to 2010, Canadian
taxpayers have paid one trillion, 100 billion dollars ($1,100,000,000,000) in
interest on the federal debt to private lenders.

In 2011, alone, Canadian taxpayers
paid the private banks an estimated $37.7 billion to service the federal
debt—over $103 million each and every day of the year!

These are tax dollars that were
stolen through fraud and corruption that could have gone towards
infrastructure, health care, education, and other social needs.

If the Government of Canada used the
Bank of Canada to create the money to cover its shortfall as it was intended to
we would not have any of these problems. Ultimately, the government could pay
off the federal debt through the same means.

And consider this AGAIN: from
confederation to 1974, Canada fought two world wars, went through a major
depression, constructed major infrastructures such as the St. Lawrence Seaway,
Trans-Canada Highway, International airports, Canadian National Railway, and
brought in social welfare programs such as Family Allowance, Old Age Security
pensions, Canada Pension Plan, Universal

Health Care and wound up with a total
accumulated debt of only $21.6 billion.

Today our federal debt is approaching
$600 billion and the government is continually cutting services while our
infrastructure is not being maintained.

Meanwhile, the private banks keep
increasing their already obscene profits. This “subsidy” to the private banks
must end.

The Solution

The solution to this problem is
simply for the government to stop borrowing money from the private banks at
interest and borrow from the Bank of Canada at no interest. The private banks
should also be prevented from creating money. That right should be returned to
the People of Canada through the Bank of Canada.

This is how it should work Canada
gives the Bank of Canada an IOU; bank of Canada creates money to Canada at 0
percent interest.

Canada takes the money and gives it
to Canadian people to create jobs.

The Canadian people pay back the bank
of Canada and since there is no compounded interest the DEBT will not grow

This will allow the people of Canada
to pay off the debt and use the money on real things rather than paying some
private bank that steals your hard earned labour for money.

Also whoever was responsible for
these crimes prosecuted to full extent of the LAW by the PEOPLE...

Isn't that convenient he returned the
same favour Lester Pearson did for him and did they same exact thing for John
Napier he was appointed Minister of Justice and Minister of Finance

NOTE: Prime Minister: Pierre Trudeau
Minister of Finance: John Turner Governor of the Bank of Canada:

Amid a world recession and the
prospect of having to implement the unpopular wage and price controls, Turner
surprisingly resigned his position in 1975. After a hiatus from politics from
1975 to 1984, Turner returned and successfully contested the Liberal
leadership.

Why did he contest the Liberal
Leadership? I have my opinion.

Turner held the office of Prime
Minister for 79 days (the second shortest tenure in Canadian history after
Charles Tupper), as he dissolved Parliament immediately after being sworn in as
Prime Minister, and went on to lose the 1984 election in a landslide.

Turner stayed on as Liberal leader
and headed the Official Opposition for the next six years, leading his party to
a modest recovery in the 1988 campaign, resigning from politics in 1990.

1984, and John Turner succeeded him
as Prime Minister.

Admirers praise the force of
Trudeau's intellect and salute his political acumen in preserving national
unity against the Quebec sovereignty movement, suppressing a violent revolt,
and establishing the Charter of Rights and Freedoms within Canada's
constitution. Critics accuse him of arrogance, economic mismanagement, and
unduly favouring the federal government relative to the provinces, especially
in trying to distribute the oil wealth of the Prairies.

Liberal - Paul Edgar Philippe Martin
also known as Paul Martin, Jr. was the 21st Prime Minister of Canada.

Martin served as the Member of
Parliament from 1988 election to his retirement in 2008.

Now we have Harper and let’s take a
good look at what he has done or not done for Canada, by far he has to be the
worst Prime Minister in our history of Canada.

NOTE: Bank of Canada is still the
Number one fraud, but Harper also well aware of this fraud of the bank of
Canada still continues to put many more nails in to the Canadian coffin than
any other Prime Minster.

His Policies will shock you if you
have not paid attention. I also will understand as the main Media in Canada has
not informed most Canadians of his dealing.

THE NEW CANADA UNDER STEVEN HARPER

Conservative -Stephen Harper Prime
Minister is the 22nd and current Prime Minister of Canada .Harper became Prime
Minister in 2006, forming a minority government after the 2006 election.

Harper with a power base in Alberta
and home of Canada's oil boom, Known as an ally of Canadian fossil fuels, has
promoted their export to the U.S. and China.

Environment

Harper dismantled many environmental
restrictions on economic growth.

Canada has become an international
laggard in environmental policy and practice is now an incontrovertible fact.

In 2009, the Conference Board of
Canada ranked Canada 15th out of 17 wealthy industrialized nations on
environmental performance. In 2010, researchers at Simon Fraser University
ranked Canada 24th out of 25 OECD nations on environmental performance.

Not one of the bills introduced in
the current session is intended to improve Canada’s environmental record.
Instead, environmental laws are being weakened to expedite industrial
development. Standards are being relaxed to meet industry’s demands.

Military-Industrial Complex

Harper increased federal defense spending by
nearly $1 billion annually in his first four years in office, with more
projected. The new Canada is a place where militarism is given pride of place
over peacemaking.

The blending of sport and the
military, with the government as the marching band, is part of the new
nationalism the Conservatives are trying to instil. It is another example of
how the state, under Stephen Harper's governance, is becoming all-intrusive.
... State controls are now at a highpoint in our modern history. There is every
indication they will extend further

Harper sells out Canada

To be blunt, Canadians have not spent
years reducing the ownership of sectors of the economy by our own governments,
only to see them bought and controlled by foreign governments instead $15
billion takeover of Canada’s Nexen oil and gas giant by the China National
Offshore Oil Corporation.

Used his newly appointed Senate (full of
conservative politicians unable to get elected in their own ridings), to kill a
climate bill that had already passed the house (presumably at the behest of his
key sponsor, the Alberta oil-sands companies).

Showed a decided partisan bias during
stimulus spending, in which 60% of stimulus money was spent in conservative
ridings (when only 46% of ridings were conservative; leaving the other 54%
percent to split the remaining 40% of the money)

Used $50 million of a G8 legacy fund
to pay for projects in Tony Clement’s riding of Muskoka/Parry Sound, despite
the bulk of the projects having NOTHING to do with the G8/G20 and being, in
some cases, 100 km away from any of the summit sites (all of this without the
approval of parliament).

Reduced the number of ridings and
representatives in Ontario by about 25%.

Set up the permanent voter’s list
which helped disenfranchise enough students and tenants to help them to squeak
to a second “majority” with less than 10,000 votes province-wide in 9 ridings
and only 45% of the popular vote despite a citizens’ campaign for “strategic
voting” to defeat the government.

Ejected REGISTERED attendees from his
campaign stops after SEARCHING THROUGH THEIR FACEBOOK PROFILES. These people were actually there to listen,
but clearly the only people that Harper can talk to are people who already
bought his bullshit.

http://www.lfpress.com/news/london/2011/04/04/17875211.html

Has actually lowered taxes on the wealthy
to the point where the bottom 10% wage earners are actually taxed more than the
top 1%.

http://www.harper-watch.ca/promises/harpers-corporate-tax-cuts/

Did not investigate the “Bev Oda”
scandal, in which one of his own ministers pencilled in a “not” that denied
federal funding to an international aid organization, and then lied about it

.

Misrepresented a quote from auditor
general Sheila Fraser to make it sound like she supported the Harper
Government’s handling of the G8 monies (she was in fact referring to the
Liberal handling of the 9/11 relief fund…)

Okay, so I think the above is a good
start but I think they sum a lot of the above up nicely. I will add to this post as I go on…

Harper promised open accountable
government, Harper has lead one of the most secretive, authoritarian
governments in Canadian history.

Stephen Harper has reshaped Canada in
two years:

Two years of Harper government have
brought profound changes to Canada, and some may be hard to undo. Not everyone
is celebrating Canada’s birthday this year.

Most are getting ready the funeral of
Canada.

Stephen Harper’s Conservatives have
reshaped much of this country in 24 short months.

From the environment, to health care,
to foreign policy, this is a different Canada than it was May 2, 2011, and many
of the Harper initiatives may not be easily undone by future governments, or
even future leaders of a Conservative government

The two-year-old government has cut
scientific research, muzzled its scientists, put limits on the independence of
Statistics Canada and is facing charges that it plans to wield more influence
over the CBC..

But some of the biggest changes in
two years under the Harper government have been our place in the world.

What's happening here: There is a
"lack of sense of inner self-restraint on the part of the prime minister,
a sense that it is some kind of war and therefore anything is legitimate, that
it's quite acceptable for a prime minister to lie.

Prorogued Parliament (three!) to
cover up/interrupt investigations into misconduct in his cabinet

The Canadian Parliament was dissolved
in March 2011, after his government failed a no-confidence vote on the issue of
the Cabinet being in contempt of parliament.

American TV political commentator
Rachel Maddow shares her thoughts on Harper’s political machinations

Harper has made Canada the laughing
stock of the world [video]

In behaving more like would be
third-world dictator rather than like the leader of an industrialized nation,
Stephen Harper has made Canada (rightly) the laughing stock of the world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8RwcWFaRF0

Ironically, if you want to hear from
the other Canada, the former Canada, the one so much admired by the world, hold
your breath.

Trade Deals – you think NAFTA crippled
this nation have a look at these trade deals from Harper

Some facts on FIPA

http://fipafacts.ca/

Formally called the Security and
Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) - is finally breaking out of the
secret chambers of the ruling elite and the federal government.

http://thetyee.ca/Views/2007/06/08/DeepIntegrate/

http://www.wnd.com/2011/02/261477/

Now back to Bank of Canada has
amassed a federal debt over $600 billion by mid-2013

Prime Minister: Pierre Trudeau

Minister of Finance: John Turner

Governor of the Bank of Canada:
Gerald Bouey

Because of the changes to the Bank of
Canada in 1974 our national debt has skyrocketed from 21.6 billion to nearly
600 billion.

Which are owed to private banks like
CIBC, TD Bank, the Royal bank, and Scotia banks and every one of these banks
have Bilderberg association.

And secondly, what was the reasoning
for the change in policy?

Pierre Elliot Trudeau, like many
other Canadian Prime Ministers attended the Bilderberg group meetings before
being elected.

Trudeau also served in the mid-1990s
on Power Corp.’s international advisory board. Also Paul Martin

Paul Desmarais financed Paul Martin
Political career

Gerald Bouey was a member of David
Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission. Rockefeller is also a chairman of the
Bilderberg group.

Both the trilateral commission and Bilderberg
g group are very well known for promoting a global government or what others
have called a “new world order”.

“Some even believe we (the
Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best
interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a
more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you
will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

- David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page
405

David Rockefeller Sept. 23, 1994
“This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and
interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long — we
are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major
crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

With every day that passes a global economic
collapse seems to be only a matter of time.

Mainly due to the massive amounts of
debt we are forced to pay unlawfully.

Could this be the right major crisis
that he spoke of?

The change in policy came, to help the
Canadian economy recover from what the government billed as a major recession.
When in reality the recession was small at best. Well it has and they succeeded
to enslave US all.

Former Prime Minister - John Turner
said the most powerful business man sit behind secret meeting to sell out
Canadian sovereignty

While Paul Martin was doing a
presentation a student asked him about the Bilderberg group and he replied if
this student asks anymore such question he would leave. In the video Oh Canada
our Bought and Sold land you can see this in the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbACCGf6q-c

From readers Digest

Reader Digest what it should have
said

The history of Canada’s federal debt;
obviously something went terribly wrong after 1974. Over a 108 year period
(1867-1974) the accumulated debt shows as nearly a flat line growing to only
$21.6 billion. But around 1974, the debt began to grow exponentially

So, what happened around 1974? In
that year

To achieve that goal, the Committee
discouraged borrowing from a nation’s own central bank interest-free and
encouraged borrowing from private creditors

The Basel Committee was established
by the central-bank Governors of the Group of Ten countries of the member
central banks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), which included
Canada.

A key objective of the Committee was
and is to maintain “monetary and financial stability.”To achieve that goal, the
Committee discouraged borrowing from a nation’s own central bank interest-free
and encouraged borrowing from private creditors, all in the name of
“maintaining the stability of the currency.”

The presumption was that borrowing
from a central bank with the power to create money on its books would inflate
the money supply and prices. Borrowing from private creditors, on the other
hand, was considered not to be inflationary, since it involved the recycling of
pre-existing money.

What the bankers did not reveal,
although they had long known it themselves, was that private banks create the
money they lend just as public banks do. The difference is simply that a publicly-owned
bank returns the interest to the government and the community, while a
privately-owned bank siphons the interest into its capital account, to be
re-invested at further interest, progressively drawing money out of the
productive economy.

Lobbying by the banks and adoption of
monetarism — the idea that “markets know best” and should be without
regulation, and that public services should be privatized — took hold.

So, around 1974, the Government of
Canada began to borrow all of the monies to cover its shortfalls from the
private sector at interest rather than creating money through the Bank of
Canada interest-free. In other words, since 1974, the Bank of Canada has not
been acting in the best interest of its shareholders: the people of Canada.

To understand how ridiculous the
present situation is, consider the 1993 Auditor General of Canada report
(Section 5.41)3 which states:

NOTE: Of this, $37 billion represents
the accumulated shortfall in meeting the cost of government programs since
Confederation. The remainder, $386 billion, represents the amount the
government has borrowed to service the debt created by previous annual
shortfalls.

In other words, of the accumulated
debt of $423 billion, the government really needed to borrow only $37 billion—accumulated
over 127 years—to cover its shortfalls on real spending for goods and services.

The rest of that accumulated debt was
monies borrowed to service the debt, essentially a payment of interest on
interest to the private sector when the government could have created the money
to cover the shortfall at what amounts to be no interest

.

In 2011, alone, Canadian taxpayers
paid the private banks an estimated $37.7 billion to service the federal debt

From 1974–1975 to 2010, Canadian
taxpayers have paid one trillion, 100 billion dollars ($1,100,000,000,000) in
interest on the federal debt to private lenders.

In 2011, alone, Canadian taxpayers
paid the private banks an estimated $37.7 billion to service the federal
debt—over $103 million each and every day of the year!

These are tax dollars that were
stolen through fraud and corruption that could have gone towards
infrastructure, health care, education, and other social needs.

If the Government of Canada used the
Bank of Canada to create the money to cover its shortfall as it was intended to
we would not have any of these problems.

Ultimately, the government could pay
off the federal debt through the same means.

And consider this AGAIN: from
confederation to 1974, Canada fought two world wars, went through a major
depression, constructed major infrastructures such as the St. Lawrence Seaway,
Trans-Canada Highway, International airports, Canadian National Railway, and
brought in social welfare programs such as Family Allowance, Old Age Security
pensions, Canada Pension Plan, Universal Health Care and wound up with a total
accumulated debt of only $21.6 billion

.

Today our federal debt is approaching
$600 billion and the government is continually cutting services while our
infrastructure is not being maintained.

Meanwhile, the private banks keep
increasing their already obscene profits. This “subsidy” to the private banks
must end.

The Solution

The solution to this problem is
simply for the government to stop borrowing money from the private banks at interest
and borrow from the Bank of Canada at no interest. The private banks should
also be prevented from creating money. That right should be returned to the
People of Canada through the Bank of Canada.

This is how it should work Canada
gives the Bank of Canada an IOU; bank of Canada creates money to Canada at 0
percent interest.

Canada takes the money and gives it
to Canadian people to create jobs.

The Canadian people pay back the bank
of Canada and since there is no compounded interest the DEBT will not grow

This will allow the people of Canada
to pay off the debt and use the money on real things rather than paying some
private bank that steals your hard earned labour for money.

Also whoever was responsible for
these crimes prosecuted to full extent of the LAW by the PEOPLE...