Research adopting the ideological-conflict hypothesis indicates that low religiosity, nonbelief, and antireligious sentiments predict prejudice toward ideological opponents. How to understand this, from an individual differences perspective, given that nonbelievers are typically open-minded and low in authoritarianism? We investigated, among 422 UK adults, social distance from antiliberals (antigay activists), fundamentalists, and religionists of major world religions (Catholicism, Islam, and Buddhism). Nonbelievers showed prejudice toward all religious targets—but not toward an ethnic outgroup (Chinese). Furthermore, antireligious sentiment implied (1) valuing rationality and, in turn, social distance from fundamentalists and (2) low empathy and low belief in the benevolence of others and the world and, in turn, social distance from religionists. Finally, (3) valuing liberty predicted social distance from antiliberals but failed to mediate the effect of antireligious sentiment. Though general processes (e.g., perceived threat) explain all prejudices, specific individual differences seem to distinguish non-believers’ and believers’ prejudice toward each other.

metadata Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche Access type Accès embargo until 2020-11-01 Publication date 2020 Language Anglais Journal information "The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion" - Vol. 30, no. 3, p. 161-177 (2020) Peer reviewed yes Publisher Routledge (Philadelphia) issn 1050-8619 e-issn 1532-7582 Publication status Publié Affiliation UCL - SSH/IPSY - Psychological Sciences Research Institute Links http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/222061 [Handle]

https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2019.1696498 [DOI]