Q:

Why was disease transfer to the Americas one-way?

It is well known that the European colonists brought many infectious diseases to the Americas, and that these had a deadly effect on the native populations, because they had no immunity to them. Were there any local infectious diseases to which the colonists were not immune? I’ve never heard of such. I’m not aware that the colonists suffered any epidemics, or that they brought any new and unusual diseases back to Europe.
Why not? Is this merely an accident of history, that there were no infectious diseases in the Americas which did not already exist in Eurasia? Or is there some explanation?

A:

In "Guns, Germs, and Steel" Jared Diamond includes quite a bit on this topic. His conclusion is that Europeans, and old world humans in general were much more exposed to their farm animals, often living in the same buildings. This allowed a much greater number of diseases to jump from animal to human, forcing us to development immunity against these pathogens.
The native americans never domesticated as many animals, and weren't exposed to as many pathogens. As a result the foreign pathogens could freely move through their populations.
So why did it only go one way? A lot more Europeans came to American than vice-versa, so there just wasn't as much opportunity for American pathogens to move to Europe. Additionally, the Europeans brought a lot of animals here, including cattle, horses, and pigs. These would have carried pathogens as well, again, very few American animals were taken to Europe.

A:

There is at least one important exception - it is generally thought that syphilis came to Europe from the Americas.

