Q:

Subset of a countable set is itself countable

How is it proved that if $$A \subset B\ \text{with}\ B\ \text{countable} $$ then $A$ is either countable, finite, or empty? I think the proof involves a $1-1$ correspondence between $\mathbb{N}$ and $A$ but other than that I do not know how to proceed.
EDIT: I have checked the solution and it advises me to proceed as follows. " As a start to a definition of $$g: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow A$$ set $$g(1)=f(n_1) $$ Then show how to inductively continue this process to produce a $1-1$ function $g$ from $\mathbb{N}$ onto $A$."
So the proof according to my book involves induction.

A:

Any subset of a countable set is countable.
Take $A\subset B$ where $B$ is countable. Then $|A|\leq|B|$ since $A\subset B$. By definition, $|A|\leq|B|$ if there is a one-to-one function from $A$ into $B$. We also see that $|B|\leq\aleph_0$ since $B$ is countable. Thus, $|A|\leq\aleph_0$.

A:

Via the bijection $\Bbb N\cong B$ we have an injection $i:A\to\Bbb N$.
Define $$f(n+1)=\min\{k∈i[A]∣k>f(n)\}$$ for 
$n≥1$ and $$f(1)=\min i[A]$$
We claim that for each $n$ we have $\{f(1)<f(2)<...<f(n)\}$ is a subset of $i[A]$ and contains each $i(a)$ less 
than $f(n)$.
Proof: Induction over $n$:
For $n=1$ clearly $f(1)∈i[A]$, and since there is no $i(a)<f(1)$, the claim is true.
Assume that the statement is true for $n$. Then by definition of $f$, the number $f(n+1)$ is larger than $f(n)$, so the set $\{f(1)<...<f(n)<f(n+1)\}$ is a subset of $i[A]$. Since $f(n+1)$ is the minimal element of $i[A]$ larger than $f(n)$, it must contain each $i(a)$ less than $f(n+1)$.
So we have shown that $f:\Bbb N↦i[A]$ is an injection. Now, for $a\in A$ we have the natural number $l=i(a)$. Since $l$ is less than $f(n)$ for some $n\in\Bbb N$, $f$ being strictly increasing, it must thus be one of $f(1),f(2),...,f(n-1)$.

