1. Introduction {#sec1-nutrients-10-01027}
===============

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of conditions---raised blood pressure, abnormal cholesterol or triglyceride levels, high blood glucose, and excess body fat around the waist---that occur together, increasing the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and kidney diseases, as well as a greater risk of cardiovascular disease mortality and all-cause mortality \[[@B1-nutrients-10-01027],[@B2-nutrients-10-01027]\].

According to the 2016-Pan American Health Organisation and Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control, MetS has become a serious public health problem \[[@B3-nutrients-10-01027]\]. For example, in 2008 the prevalence of MetS in Bogotá, Colombia was 20% for both sexes \[[@B4-nutrients-10-01027]\]. Similarly, Davila et al. \[[@B5-nutrients-10-01027]\] reported a prevalence of 41% among adults aged 25--64 from Medellin and surrounding municipalities in the Andean Colombian region, and Miranda et al. \[[@B6-nutrients-10-01027]\] conducted a cross-sectional study in Armenia, Colombia, of males with a mean age of 45.9 and reported a similar MetS prevalence of 49%, using the definition of the US National Cholesterol Education Programme--Adult Treatment Panel III \[[@B7-nutrients-10-01027]\]. For this reason, cardiovascular risk factor measurements are important, even at an early age, for detecting risk profiles in time for intervention \[[@B5-nutrients-10-01027],[@B8-nutrients-10-01027],[@B9-nutrients-10-01027]\].

As adipose tissue plays a central role in MetS, various researchers have begun to explore the predictive ability of anthropometric indicators such as waist circumference (WC), body fat percentage (BF%), body adiposity index, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio, and fat mass index (FMI) as a screening tool for MetS \[[@B10-nutrients-10-01027],[@B11-nutrients-10-01027]\]. However, these indicators are not without limitations. For example, BMI provides no data on body composition, and although WC is considered an indirect indicator of visceral fat, repeated training is required to take this measurement accurately and great variability has been reported \[[@B12-nutrients-10-01027]\]. On the other hand, anthropometric indicators consider only the effect of fat on metabolism, ignoring skeletal muscle, another relevant tissue.

In fact, skeletal muscle (SM) is the body's largest non-fat component and can contribute up to 40% of the adult human body weight and be responsible for 30% of energy expenditure \[[@B13-nutrients-10-01027]\]. SM has been established as an independent predictor of cardiometabolic diseases and mortality \[[@B14-nutrients-10-01027],[@B15-nutrients-10-01027],[@B16-nutrients-10-01027]\]. Indeed, an inverse association has been reported between SM and the prevalence of MetS in young adults \[[@B17-nutrients-10-01027],[@B18-nutrients-10-01027],[@B19-nutrients-10-01027],[@B20-nutrients-10-01027]\], and previous studies have reported that low levels of muscle mass are associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance \[[@B21-nutrients-10-01027]\] and CVD \[[@B22-nutrients-10-01027]\]. The biological pathways that lead to the protective effect of high SM levels on cardiometabolic health have not yet been determined, but since SM is a primary site for insulin-mediated glucose uptake, loss of SM may promote insulin resistance and, consequently, metabolic disorders \[[@B23-nutrients-10-01027]\].

The phenomenon by which SM reduces with the accumulation of adipose tissue is known as sarcopenic obesity, which is associated with significant morbidity \[[@B24-nutrients-10-01027]\] and mortality \[[@B25-nutrients-10-01027]\]. Xu et al. recently tested other body fat indices with the form fat mass to muscle mass, both in kg, using tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance analyses (BIA), as a surrogate marker of MetS among adults aged 20--80 years from Han and Bouyei populations in China \[[@B26-nutrients-10-01027]\]. These authors reported that the fat-to-muscle ratio is highly predictive of MetS and a useful reference indicator. Additionally, Kurinami et al. showed that the muscle-to-fat ratio is also clinically useful for evaluating the presence of insulin resistance \[[@B27-nutrients-10-01027]\].

To date, only one previous study has evaluated the applicability of the fat-to-muscle ratio for predicting MetS, with the results confirming its close relationship with the components of MetS \[[@B26-nutrients-10-01027]\]. There is, however, no consensus as to the cut-off value that can be used to define excess adiposity based on the fat-to-muscle ratio. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to explore the fat-to-muscle ratio thresholds for diagnosing MetS, under the hypothesis that this ratio is a good predictive indicator of MetS in a large population of young Colombian adults.

2. Methods {#sec2-nutrients-10-01027}
==========

2.1. Study Design {#sec2dot1-nutrients-10-01027}
-----------------

This study is part of the FUPRECOL study \[[@B28-nutrients-10-01027],[@B29-nutrients-10-01027]\] which included 1,948 Colombian universities. FUPRECOL study is a cross-sectional surveillance study that was carried out between 2014 and 2018, designed to establish the general prevalence of CVD risk factors (anthropometric, adiposity, metabolic, and genetic markers) in the study population (aged 18 to 25.9 years living in Colombia) using a standardized data collection protocol. The study included three data collection sites from seven Colombian universities including Tunja (Boyacá), Cali (Valle del Cauca), and Bogotá (Cundinamarca). The aim was to recruit up to 250 to 500 participants per site over a 4-year data collection period. Ethics approval for this project was originally obtained from the Research Ethics Board (UMB N° 01-1802-2013 and UR N° CEI-ABN026-000262, coordinating centre) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Hong Kong in 1989 and in Edinburgh, Scotland, in 2000). Each site subsequently obtained technical approval from their respective research board (Bogotá UMB Code N° 01-1802-2013, UR Code N° CEI-ABN026-000010; Cali UNIAJC Code N° 111-02.01.48/16; Tunja Code N° RECT 60). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before data collection, and this study also complied with Colombian laws regulating clinical research on human subjects (Resolution 008430/1993 of the Ministry of Health).

2.2. Sample Population {#sec2dot2-nutrients-10-01027}
----------------------

Participant recruitment locations were selected across all sites using purposive, non-randomized sampling. Exclusion factors included a clinical diagnosis of CVD, DM-1 and 2, pregnancy, the use of alcohol or drugs, and, in general, the presence of any disease not directly associated with nutrition. Volunteers received no compensation for their participation. Of the 1,934 participants who took part in FUPRECOL study, a total of 1,416 remained in the present analysis after excluding participants without a blood pressure (*n* = 18), body mass index (BMI; *n* = 58), waist circumference (WC; *n* = 29), and metabolic profile (*n* = 204) values. This study used control variables in the analyses, so subjects without information on BIA (*n* = 137) and smoking (*n* = 72) were excluded.

2.3. Data Collection Procedures {#sec2dot3-nutrients-10-01027}
-------------------------------

Data collection staff had a background in CVD risk factors (anthropometric, adiposity, metabolic, and genetic markers) or lifestyle assessment, and were subsequently trained by research staff from the coordinating centre (UR, Bogotá). When measuring body weight, fat mass, and muscle mass, the participants were in light clothing and stood barefoot. Body weight (kg) was measured using an electric scale (Model Tanita^®^ BC-418^®^, Tokyo, Japan) and height (cm) with a portable stadiometer (Seca^®^ 216, Hamburg, Germany). Waist circumference WC (cm) was measured as the narrowest point between the lower costal border and the iliac crest using a metal tape measure (Lufkin W606PM^®^, Parsippany, NJ, USA). BMI and waist-to-height ratio were calculated as weight (kg)/height (m^2^) and WC (cm)/height (cm), respectively. We determined body fat percentage (BF%), fat mass index (FMI) and fat mass (kg) using BIA by whole-body impedance (Tanita Model BC-418^®^, Tokyo, Japan). Detailed information about the BIA technique has been provided in previous studies \[[@B30-nutrients-10-01027],[@B31-nutrients-10-01027]\]. A new variable, (ratio of fat mass to muscle mass, both in kilograms) was calculated as described in Xu et al. \[[@B26-nutrients-10-01027]\]. For all anthropometric variables, a low technical error measurement was reported (less than 2%).

2.4. Metabolic Syndrome Diagnosis {#sec2dot4-nutrients-10-01027}
---------------------------------

Between 6:00 and 9:00 a.m. after 10--12 h of an overnight fast, blood samples were extracted from capillary sampling. Participants were asked not to engage in prolonged exercise 24 h prior to testing. Using enzymatic colorimetric methods, we measured (i) high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c); (ii) triglycerides (TG); (iii) total cholesterol; and (iv) fasting blood glucose. For all blood samples, we obtained errors of less than 4%.

Blood pressure was measured accurately with an electronic sphygmomanometer (Omron^®^ Healthcare Europe B.V., Hoofddorp, The Netherlands). Individuals were seated in a semi-reclined position with arms relaxed and supported, while the midpoint of the arm was positioned at the level of the heart.

MetS was defined in accordance with the updated harmonized criteria of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) \[[@B32-nutrients-10-01027]\]. According to the criteria of the IDF, participants were considered to have MetS if they showed three or more of the following: (i) central obesity (men with a WC ≥ 90 cm and women with a WC ≥ 80 cm); (ii) increased TG: ≥ 150 mg/dL; (iii) decreased HDL-C level: men \< 40 mg/dL and women \< 50 mg/dL; (iv) increased systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg; and (v) increased fasting blood-glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL. Thereafter, the TG/HDL and TG/glucose ratios were calculated.

2.5. Statistical Analysis {#sec2dot5-nutrients-10-01027}
-------------------------

The characteristics of the participants were given as means and standard deviations, or percentages, where appropriate. Independent two-tailed *t*-tests for continuous variables and chi-square (χ^2^) tests for categorical variables were used to examine sex differences.

Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) were calculated to examine the discriminatory ability of ratio of fat mass to muscle mass to predict MetS by the area under the curve (AUC). AUC has been reported to be a global indicator of diagnostic performance since it represents the ability of the test to correctly classify participants with a high risk of MetS (*p*-values \< 0.01 and an AUC \> 0.80) \[[@B33-nutrients-10-01027]\]. The literature does not provide consensus on what would be the best classifications for AUCs \[[@B34-nutrients-10-01027],[@B35-nutrients-10-01027]\]. However, AUCs values of 0.55--0.62, 0.63--0.71, and \>0.71 corresponded to an effect size (Cohen's d) of small, medium, and large, respectively \[[@B36-nutrients-10-01027]\]. Cutoff points were chosen based on J-Youden index, which uses the point on the ROC parameter that is farthest from the line of equality \[[@B37-nutrients-10-01027]\]. In addition, the positive likelihood ratio was also determined.

Finally, an ANOVA was used to investigate whether ratio of fat mass to muscle mass differed by identifying high and low risk of MetS group by applying the ROC cut point in gender groups.

All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM-SPSS, version 24.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the level of significance was set at alpha \< 0.05.

3. Results {#sec3-nutrients-10-01027}
==========

3.1. Study Participants {#sec3dot1-nutrients-10-01027}
-----------------------

[Table 1](#nutrients-10-01027-t001){ref-type="table"} shows the results obtained for the anthropometric, blood pressure, and metabolic biomarker parameters. The final sample comprised a total of 1416 young people. There were 472 males (33.3%) and 944 females (66.6%) with a mean age of 20.8 ± 1.9 (minimum age of 18.1 years and maximum age of 25.1 years). Means (SDs) for the sample were: BMI, 23.5 (3.8) kg/m^2^; WC, 74.2 (9.6) cm; fat-to-muscle ratio, 0.343 (0.163) kg, and 10.3% MetS prevalence using the IDF criteria.

The cohort of women was found to have lower weight, height, WC, waist-to-height ratio, blood pressure, triglycerides, TG/HDL, and TG/G ratios than the men (*p* \< 0.001). However, they had higher body fat (% and kg), fat mass index, fat-to-muscle ratio, total cholesterol, LDL, and HDL, in comparison to the men (*p* \< 0.001). It is worth highlighting that, in the study sample, the prevalence of MetS was greater in men than women (*p* \< 0.001).

3.2. Optimal Cut-Off Value in the MetS Screening {#sec3dot2-nutrients-10-01027}
------------------------------------------------

The ROC curve analyses for the diagnostic performance of the ratio of fat mass to muscle mass in identifying a high risk of MetS are shown in [Table 2](#nutrients-10-01027-t002){ref-type="table"}. In men, when considering the full sample (*n* = 472), the best fat-to-muscle ratio cut-off point for detecting MetS according to the IDF was 0.225 kg (AUC 0.88, sensitivity 80%, and specificity 70%); for women, the fat-to-muscle ratio cut-off point was 0.495 kg (AUC 0.83, sensitivity 82%, specificity 80%).

3.3. Sex Thresholds for High and Low Ratios of Fat Mass to Muscle Mass According to Anthropometric, Blood Pressure, and Metabolic Biomarker Parameters, and Sex {#sec3dot3-nutrients-10-01027}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Group- and sex-specific fat-to-muscle ratio thresholds for the presence of MetS according to the IDF, are provided in [Table 3](#nutrients-10-01027-t003){ref-type="table"}, with the corresponding anthropometric, blood pressure, and metabolic profile differences. In both groups the thresholds may, therefore, be used to categorise individuals into two categories of risk (i.e., low and high risk of MetS) on the combined basis of sex and fat-to-muscle ratio group. In men, the optimal cut-off score for the fat-to-muscle ratio showed that there were differences in anthropometric, blood pressure, and metabolic biomarker parameters (all *p* \< 0.01).

In women, we found differences in anthropometric, blood pressure, and metabolic biomarker parameters (*p* \< 0.001), with the exception of total cholesterol (*p* = 0.161) and LDL-C levels (*p* = 0.209).

4. Discussion {#sec4-nutrients-10-01027}
=============

Metabolic disturbances, including abdominal adiposity, dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, and impaired glucose metabolism, have been identified as risk factors for CVD, as well as all-cause and CVD mortality \[[@B1-nutrients-10-01027],[@B2-nutrients-10-01027]\]. For this reason, MetS has been established as a worldwide public health problem, with the number of cases rising fastest in Latin-American countries \[[@B38-nutrients-10-01027]\]. In our study of a population of young Colombian adults, the total prevalence of MetS was 10.3% using the IDF criteria, with the prevalence being higher in males than females (15.2% vs. 8.0%, respectively). In contrast, in the Cardiovascular Risk Factor Multiple Evaluation in Latin America (CARMELA) study conducted on seven Latin American populations, the estimated prevalence of MetS in Bogotá was 20% \[[@B39-nutrients-10-01027]\]. These differences could be explained by the MetS cluster used, since in the CARMELA study MetS was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III), in addition to the different age ranges of the two study populations (25--54 vs. 18.1--25.1 years).

Identifying screening tools for predicting MetS early in life is especially relevant in developing effective prevention against MetS in early adulthood. According to Bonomini et al., 2015, in young adults with MetS there is a higher risk of developing insulin resistance, low-grade chronic inflammation and oxidative stress \[[@B40-nutrients-10-01027]\]. Therefore, metabolic imbalance at an early age is worrisome, as this may represent the initiation of the atherosclerotic process that is a determinant in the development of CVD \[[@B41-nutrients-10-01027]\]. This study provides gender-specific fat-to-muscle ratio reference thresholds for diagnosing MetS in young adults. Our findings showed that the fat-to-muscle ratio has a high discriminatory power for detecting MetS in young Colombian adults, supporting the hypothesis that it is a useful indicator for identifying young people at a high risk of MetS. Taking into consideration the fact that MetS is an important risk factor for CVD incidence \[[@B1-nutrients-10-01027]\], these findings are of special interest since they reveal the clinically relevant utility of the fat-to-muscle ratio for detecting metabolic risk in young people.

Fat mass and muscle mass have been independently associated with metabolic risk; however, there was limited evidence on the relationship of the fat-to-muscle ratio with metabolic syndrome \[[@B26-nutrients-10-01027],[@B42-nutrients-10-01027]\]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the predictive capacity of fat-to-muscle ratio with respect to MetS in a cohort of young people. The fat-to-muscle ratio thresholds established for detecting a high risk of MetS were ≥0.225 kg in men and ≥0.495 kg in women, with high sensitivity and specificity at the cut-off points for both genders. Furthermore, when comparisons were made by categorising the participants into low and high risk of MetS considering these cut-off points, MetS-related indicators such as anthropometric, blood pressure, and metabolic biomarker parameters in men, and anthropometric, blood pressure, and metabolic biomarker parameters in women were significantly different in the high risk of MetS group compared to the low risk group. This indicates that the cut-off points reported for the fat-to-muscle ratio appear to be useful predictors of metabolic risk in early adulthood.

Our results are consistent with recent findings indicating that fat-to-muscle ratio is a predictor of adult MetS \[[@B26-nutrients-10-01027],[@B27-nutrients-10-01027],[@B42-nutrients-10-01027]\]. In this context, Xu et al. demonstrated that the fat-to-muscle ratio was highly predictive of MetS in a Chinese cohort of 4553 cases of MetS, where the study participants were aged 20--80 \[[@B26-nutrients-10-01027]\]. Similarly, a previous study conducted on 61 untreated diabetes mellitus patients found that, in daily clinical practice, fat-to-muscle ratio is clinically useful for evaluating the presence of insulin resistance \[[@B27-nutrients-10-01027]\]. Park et al. also reported that the muscle-to-fat ratio indicator was useful in the early prevention and management of MetS in 6256 Koreans subjects \[[@B42-nutrients-10-01027]\]. However, differences in ethnicity, age range, and lifestyle of the previous study populations investigated could mean that the results are not directly comparable. Even so, to prevent MetS, it is important to decrease body fat; however, an adequate amount of muscle mass, or an increase in this tissue, is also necessary \[[@B21-nutrients-10-01027]\]. This study, in line with the above-mentioned results, supports the importance of promoting physical training to prevent fat mass accumulation and maximise muscle mass to provide metabolic health benefits \[[@B43-nutrients-10-01027]\]. The exact mechanisms through which the fat-to-muscle mass ratio determines MetS risk have not been elucidated, but the increased muscle mass might produce metabolic and structural changes that improve muscle insulin sensitivity and glycaemic control \[[@B44-nutrients-10-01027],[@B45-nutrients-10-01027]\]. Nevertheless, to elucidate the exact mechanisms underlying this association between fat-to-muscle ratio and MetS risk, future longitudinal studies and work involving ethnically different populations are needed.

On the other hand, since body fat mass and muscle mass can be easily measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis, the fat-to-muscle ratio may be used as a powerful predictor of MetS assessed without the need for a full physical examination. Its ease of use makes it a useful complementary assessment measure that could help clinicians prevent MetS and, consequently, the risk of CVD in early adulthood.

This study has potential limitations. Firstly, the cross-sectional design does not allow us to explain causality. For this reason, a future prospective analysis is necessary to determine causal links between the fat-to-muscle ratio and MetS. Secondly, since our study population comprised a well-characterized cohort of young Colombian adults, these findings may not be generalizable to the general population. Therefore, future population-based studies conducted on other ethnic groups and age range are required to provide fat-to-muscle ratio cut-off values for detecting MetS in different populations. Additionally, it also should be noted that we have only applied the IDF criteria to define MetS in our study population. Thus, further studies verifying our results by using also other criteria such as the NCEP-ATP III should be of interest. Finally, although this study was conducted in a large sample size that allows us to provide data on a national scale, further work in larger cohort should be undertaken to confirms our preliminary findings.

Despite these limitations, this is the first research to explore the predictive power of the fat-to-muscle ratio in relation to MetS in a specific population of young adults. Accordingly, this study has relevant clinical implications in that it permits the early detection of MetS at a young age. Additional strengths of this study include the measurements of both fat mass and muscle mass using very reliable measuring devices. Finally, highly standardised procedures have been developed within the FRUPECOL study to avoid measurement bias.

5. Conclusions {#sec5-nutrients-10-01027}
==============

In summary, our findings support the hypothesis that the fat-to-muscle ratio has a high discriminatory power for detecting MetS in young Colombian adults. This study proposes the first cut-off points for use in clinical practice to predict MetS risk. Considering that MetS in young adults is considered an important public health problem, this study is especially relevant as it provides a novel indicator for the early identification of MetS, which is easy to calculate and suitable for populational level screening. The cut-off points reported can be easily applied to identify populations of young Colombian adults who should be the target of interventions. Future studies of different ethnic groups are required to establish more accurate reference points that are applicable to populations in countries across the globe.

This research was funded by the Centre for Studies on Measurement of Physical Activity, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario grant number \[Code N° FIUR DN-BG001\]. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, the preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to publish.

R.R.-V., J.E.C.-B., H.A.C., and A.G.-H. conceived and designed the study; M.C.-R., E.G.-J., and J.S.-R. contributed to the data analysis; R.R.-V. and K.G.-R. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

BF

body fat

BIA

bioelectrical impedance analysis

BMI

body mass index

CVD

cardiovascular disease

FUPRECOL

in Spanish: Association between Muscular Strength and Metabolic Risk Factors in Colombia

HDL-C

high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

IDF

International Diabetes Federation

LDL-C

low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

MetS

metabolic syndrome

NCEP ATP III

National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III

SD

standard deviation

WC

Waist circumference

nutrients-10-01027-t001_Table 1

###### 

Characteristics among a sample (mean (standard deviation (SD)) or frequency (%)).

  Characteristics                 Total (*n* = 1416)   Sex             *p*-Value       
  ------------------------------- -------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------
  **Anthropometric parameters**                                                        
  Age, years                      20.8 (1.9)           20.6 (2.2)      20.8 (1.7)      0.091
  Weight, kg                      63.0 (12.6)          71.0 (12.4)     59.0 (10.7)     \<0.001
  Height, m                       1.63 (0.09)          1.72 (0.07)     1.59 (0.06)     \<0.001
  Body mass index, kg/m^2^        23.5 (3.8)           23.9 (3.6)      23.3 (3.9)      0.008
  Waist circumference, cm         74.2 (9.6)           79.6 (9.9)      71.6 (8.3)      \<0.001
  Waist-to-height ratio           0.455 (0.054)        0.463 (0.056)   0.451 (0.052)   \<0.001
  Fat mass, kg                    15.3 (7.6)           12.5 (6.9)      16.7 (7.5)      \<0.001
  Body fat, %                     23.6 (8.5)           16.8 (6.1)      27.0 (7.3)      \<0.001
  Fat mass index                  5.8 (2.9)            4.2 (2.3)       6.6 (2.8)       \<0.001
  Fat-to-muscle ratio, kg         0.343 (0.163)        0.218 (0.104)   0.405 (0.151)   \<0.001
  **Blood pressure**                                                                   
  Systolic blood pressure         114.8 (12.7)         121.9 (13.0)    111.3 (11.0)    \<0.001
  Diastolic blood pressure        73.0 (10.0)          75.2 (10.7)     72.0 (9.4)      \<0.001
  Mean arterial pressure          93.9 (10.0)          98.5 (10.7)     91.7 (8.8)      \<0.001
  **Metabolic parameters**                                                             
  Total cholesterol, mg/dL        141.4 (32.2)         133.4 (29.5)    145.5 (32.8)    0.003
  HDL-C, mg/dL                    41.6 (11.9)          38.2 (9.9)      43.3 (12.5)     0.018
  LDL-C, mg/dL                    85.5 (26.2)          80.8 (24.7)     87.7 (26.6)     \<0.001
  Triglycerides, mg/dL            92.9 (48.0)          99.4 (50.9)     89.7 (46.2)     \<0.001
  Glucose, mg/dL                  87.7 (10.5)          88.4 (9.7)      87.4 (10.8)     0.073
  TG/HDL ratio                    2.5 (1.6)            2.8 (1.9)       2.3 (1.5)       \<0.001
  TG/G ratio                      8.2 (0.5)            8.3 (0.5)       8.2 (0.4)       \<0.001
  MetS prevalence, n (%) \*       147 (10.3)           72 (15.2)       75 (8.0)        \<0.001

Continuous variables are reported as mean values (standard deviations (SDs)) and categorical variables are reported as numbers and percentages in brackets \*. Significant between-sex differences (*t*-tests or \* chi-square test χ^2^). LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; G: glucose; MetS: metabolic syndrome.

nutrients-10-01027-t002_Table 2

###### 

Diagnostic properties of ratio of fat mass to muscle mass to detect high risk of MetS according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) by sex.

  Parameter              Sex                      
  ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------
  AUC (Standard error)   0.837 (0.027)            0.889 (0.019)
  95% CI                 0.782 to 0.892           0.852 to 0.927
  *p*-value              \<0.0001                 \<0.0001
  J-Youden               0.511                    0.627
  Cut-off (kg)           0.225                    0.495
  Sensitivity (95% CI)   0.805 (0.695 to 0.889)   0.826 (0.721 to 0.904)
  Specificity (95% CI)   0.706 (0.658 to 0.750)   0.800 (0.772 to 0.827)
  Likelihood ratio       2.740                    4.153

AUC: area under the curve; CI: confidence interval.

nutrients-10-01027-t003_Table 3

###### 

Sex thresholds of ratio of fat mass to muscle mass to detect high risk of MetS according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), for anthropometric, blood pressure, metabolic biomarker parameters, and sex.

  Characteristics                 Men (*n* = 472)   *p*-Value       Women (*n* = 944)   *p*-Value                       
  ------------------------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------
  **Anthropometric parameters**                                                                                         
  Weight, kg                      65.0 (7.3)        81.1 (12.6)     \<0.001             54.5 (6.2)      72.8 (9.5)      \<0.001
  Body mass index, kg/m^2^        21.9 (1.9)        27.2 (3.4)      \<0.001             21.7 (2.4)      28.3 (3.3)      \<0.001
  Waist circumference, cm         74.6 (5.3)        87.9 (10.1)     \<0.001             68.3 (5.5)      81.2 (7.4)      \<0.001
  Waist-to-height ratio           0.434 (0.030)     0.510 (0.057)   \<0.001             0.432 (0.038)   0.507 (0.048)   \<0.001
  Fat mass, kg                    8.5 (2.4)         19.0 (7.1)      \<0.001             13.3 (4.1)      26.8 (6.3)      \<0.001
  Body fat, %                     13.0 (2.8)        23.0 (5.0)      \<0.001             23.9 (5.3)      36.5 (3.6)      \<0.001
  Fat mass index                  1.7 (0.4)         3.7 (1.3)       \<0.001             3.3 (1.0)       6.5 (1.4)       \<0.001
  Fat-to-muscle ratio, kg         0.157 (0.036)     0.321 (0.101)   \<0.001             0.337 (0.093)   0.611 (0.099)   \<0.001
  **Blood pressure**                                                                                                    
  Systolic blood pressure         119.4 (12.3)      125.9 (13.1)    \<0.001             109.9 (10.8)    115.6 (10.5)    \<0.001
  Diastolic blood pressure        73.0 (10.1)       78.7 (10.7)     \<0.001             71.3 (9.5)      74.1 (9.0)      \<0.001
  Mean arterial pressure          96.2 (10.1)       102.3 (10.5)    \<0.001             90.6 (8.7)      94.9 (8.3)      \<0.001
  **Metabolic parameters**                                                                                              
  Total cholesterol (mg/dL)       130.3 (26.9)      138.7 (32.9)    0.003               144.6 (33. 3)   148.1 (31.3)    0.161
  HDL-C (mg/dL)                   39.7 (9.6)        35.7 (9.8)      0.018               44.8 (12.5)     38.6 (11.3)     \<0.001
  LDL-C (mg/dL)                   78.3 (23.2)       84.5 (26.4)     \<0.001             87.0 (26.6)     89.2 (6.77)     0.209
  Triglycerides (mg/dL)           90.7 (41.7)       113.8 (60.7)    \<0.001             84.6 (42.4)     105.1 (53.2     \<0.001
  Glucose (mg/dL)                 87.6 (9.0)        89.8 (10.7)     0.020               86.7 (11.2)     89.3 (9.2)      \<0.001
  TG/HDL ratio                    2.5 (1.6)         3.4 (2.1)       \<0.001             2.0 (1.2)       3.0 (1.9)       \<0.001
  TG/G ratio                      8.2 (0.4)         8.4 (0.5)       \<0.001             8.1 (0.4)       8.4 (0.4)       \<0.001
  MetS prevalence, n (%) \*       13 (4.4)          59 (33.3)       \<0.001             13 (1.8)        62 (26.2)       \<0.001

Continuous variables are reported as mean values (standard deviations (SDs)) and categorical variables are reported as numbers and percentages in brackets \*. Significant between-sex differences (ANOVA or chi-square test χ^2^). LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; G: glucose; MetS: metabolic syndrome.
