How Gravitation Works

The WMAPP probe found the lumpiness of the early cosmos which led to the formation of galxies, stars and planets.

The nature of gravity

Gravity
is a force that no one completely understands. Einstein’s summation
states that matter tells space-time how to curve and the curvature of
space-time tells matter how to act. Thus the space-time-gravity trio
behaves like a feedback system. The curvature of space-time is
Einstein’s expression for gravity. But general relativity (GR) does
not work on the quantum realm, so we are left without a quantum
relativity and quantum gravity/curvature. At the atomic and
sub-atomic level there are problems with classical and quantum
physics that have as yet to be resolved completely outside of fixes
that are attached. There are clues and experiments that suggest that
there is an answer. Hereinafter is presented a hypothesis that will
attempt to explain the mysterious force of space-time curvature on all
levels. We must also consider that gravity as a force is one of the
weakest forces of nature, in comparison, the electromagnetic force is
some 10^39 time greater in strength (10 followed by 39 zeros).
Although it is stronger than gravity by far, it is not apparent
mainly because of the near balance between attraction and repulsion.
But when an imbalance does occur in a magnetic or electrical system,
the results are spectacular, including a complete alteration of
space-time curvature such as found near magnetars and the event
horizons of charged black holes.

The
cosmos exists in a condition of two co-existing fundamental states,
the real manifest cosmos of energy and matter and the condition known
as the Planck False Vacuum State from which virtual energy and
particles manifest. One state is in a condition of unity and the
other in a state of diversity-division. Out of the Planck False
Vacuum state is born such things as virtual particles which can
interact with the matter of the cosmos. Further, forces such as the
proven Casimir effect operate seemingly out of this “void”.
Virtual particles have been observed in high energy experiments and
it is the interactions with the magnetic field that separate the
virtual pair into matter and anti-matter parts. As long as they don’t
come together, they can exist in the real cosmos indefinitely. The
cosmos is filled with high energy sources ranging from star cores,
supernovae and black holes, all of which have been active from the
very beginning of space-time.

Much of
what we see also exists in a state far from equilibrium, which is why
we have visible change that is so easily detected. All manifest
matter in the universe exists in a broad range of states. There are
high energy regions in galactic cores and super-massive stars and
also cold dark voids. Energy flows within this differential from
places of concentration to a place where it is lacking. Given the
turbulent structure of much of the cosmos, the path of energy from
its concentrated state to its lowest expression is often a winding
and convoluted path. This particular reality is essential where the
second law of thermodynamics is concerned, as it allows for the
seeming self-organization we call life within the context of
thermodynamics. Gravity in a combined and unequal manner contributes
much to the turbulence. Gravity too exists in this curious condition,
especially when the cosmic acceleration is concerned.

From
these observations it has been determined that the Planck False
Vacuum State is not a void, but something else altogether existing in
a condition beyond our current understanding. Specifically, it is the
potential birth state of all that there is and is to be and also its
return state. The formation of virtual particles is something that
occurs constantly and this often interacts with the cosmos, so that
even currently, change occurs continuously due to the existence of
virtual particles manifesting from the Planck False Vacuum. It is
this interaction that can account for realities like quantum jumping,
quantum tunneling, the Casimir effect, matter, energy, anti-matter,
quantum gravity and quantum relativity. In current thinking, dark
matter and dark energy (that which is not currently visible to us)
are also born from here. It may be that the dark matter and energy
are the effects of the Planck False Vacuum State in action. The
Planck False Vacuum State is a kind of reference base for the
manifest cosmos in all is permutations and combination. It may well
be that this base allows for things like ‘negentropy’ and
complexity as we see as part of the manifestation of reality. We
already know what effect the Planck False Vacuum State has on the
visible cosmos. If God creates the cosmos on an ongoing basis, it is
from here that it is done, as this is no passive condition, but an
ongoing and dynamic state. The Planck False Vacuum State exists
outside of the limits of time, but has a profound influence on
space-time-curvature.

There
are questions for sure about the real nature of reality based on what
has already been covered. Let us delve into this for a moment. From
the early days of atomic science, we have grown to learn that matter
is mostly “empty” space. The term empty space here is used
conditionally considering what has already been disclosed concerning
the Planck False Vacuum State and its interaction with the existing
cosmos. Three dimensional space as we know it is really a fractal
dimension. In other words, it is a fraction of a dimension. To
understand this we need to consider the concept of the Cantor Set as
seen in fractal geometry. The Cantor Set forms the foundation of the
ideas behind fractal geometry. The basic construct is the division of
a ‘solid’ line into thirds and removing the center part. The two
remaining whole parts are then divided into three and the center part
is removed again. This is done until only a fine ‘dust’ remains.
This is within the one-dimensional construct of a line. This concept
can be carried from one to two and three dimensions. Thus the
structures we see in three dimensions are actually closer to two
dimensions, but always greater than two if just greater. When we look
at galaxies, we see that they are places that are flat spirals,
elliptical or spherical. They are made up of numerous stars, planets,
bits and pieces and dust. They contain lots of “empty space.” In
fractal geometry, add to the idea, the concept of complex numbers
involving real and imaginary numbers, then we enter into the realm of
fractal geometry itself with its weird self-similar and self-affine
patterns; some of which are very close to things we see in the real
cosmos and in nature. Fractal patterns and maps are generated by
iterated calculations that can be analogous to discrete quantum
events and the idea of time. These calculations produce three states
that are analogous to phenomenon in the real cosmos that suggest
accelerating expansion, collapse into black holes and conditional
stability.

Iterations
are analogous to discrete occurrences that always occur in the
quantum realm. The whole gist of Einstein’s photoelectric effect,
which now has been proven and used in modern technology, is based on
discrete occurrence between matter and energy, especially in phase
state changes and specific wavelength interaction with electrons and
nucleons. An experiment was conducted on the gravitational effect on
a falling neutron, which turned out to "fall" in discrete
jumps. Neutrons were chosen because of their intrinsic neutral charge
electric moment to avoid as much of the intense electromagnetic
action as possible. What does this prove? Gravity or the curvature of
space is discrete; similar in type to the photo-electric effect. In
fact, it may be mainly mediated through the neutrons as electrons and
protons can easily overcome gravity, especially at the quantum level

“Physicists
have observed quantized states of matter under the influence of
gravity for the first time. Valery Nesvizhevsky of the Institute
Laue-Langevin and colleagues found that cold neutrons moving in a
gravitational field do not move smoothly but jump from one height to
another, as predicted by quantum theory. The finding could be used to
probe fundamental physics such as the equivalence principle, which
states that different masses accelerate at the same rate in a
gravitational field (V Nesvizhevsky et al
2001 Nature 415
297).” (5)

The
Planck False Vacuum State constantly interacts with existing real
matter. All around us at all times particle pairs are constantly
popping into our universe in matter-antimatter pairs. Most annihilate
almost immediately upon birth. Some manage to separate due to
electromagnetic forces, the presence of black holes or an encounter
with ordinary matter. It is the encounter with ordinary matter that
concerns us here, for it does a few things. It creates quantum
gravity similar to what occurs in the Casimir effect. It creates a
type of quantum Brownian motion. It helps to keep atoms stable.

Dealing
with mass and its relation to gravity, we have to know what the exact
mass of a planet is in order to calculate the quantum gravitational
effect in the sum total. This is not as easy as it appears as we have
no exact way of determining what a planet; any planet is made of
chemically in its total. We know for instance that iron is more
massive than hydrogen and that uranium is more massive than both of
them. What we do have to go on is the gravitational influence of the
sun and the planets. Table 1 below indicates what the gravitational
influence compared to Earth for the sun and the planets.

Considering
the above we find a radical difference between the masses of Earth
and Jupiter, yet Jupiter’s gravitational acceleration is only 2.65
times more than the Earth’s. Jupiter contains the volume equivalent
of 318 Earth’s. Further, looking at the Earth-Moon relationship in
the same light, the moon has 17 percent of the acceleration due to
gravity than that of the Earth, yet in this relationship, the Earth
is some 80 times more massive. It has been proven that the Earth and
moon are similar in make up. It makes you ask why? Clearly there is a
process involved in gravity that is not part of a straight mass
gravity numerical equivalence. Is it possible that in gas giants,
which lack heavier elements and thus neutrons, there follows a weaker
gravitational effect? There is something else involved. Part of that
something else is what each planet is made of. In the case of the
Earth, we are pretty certain that it comprises chiefly of silicates,
iron and rocky material. In the case of Jupiter, that we cannot
directly access; we know that the atmosphere is made up of about 98
percent hydrogen, 2 percent of helium and other elements and
molecules. We don’t really know what the interior is made of. We
have to guess and this leaves a lot of wiggle room as to what the
real mass of Jupiter is. It can be inferred from its relationship
with the sun and the resulting wobble of the sun caused by Jupiter.
Due to the presence of the other planets, this becomes an analysis of
the N-bodied problem, something that not even the likes of giants
like LePlace, Lagrange, Poincare and others could solve. Finding the
true mass of Jupiter is something that is partly inferred, partly
calculated and partly intuited.

We
are told that cosmic bodies attract one another by gravity and that
the larger the body, the greater the gravitational force it has upon
all other bodies. In turn, it is attracted by all other bodies. This
is all well and fine if you could personally visit other planets to
find out yourself. Further, why must gravity be an attractive force
at all? We don’t actually know for sure at this juncture in
history! There is thankfully, an easier way to deal with the force,
with some qualification.

Any
worker in a sweatshop knows instantly the import of gravity on
various sized bodies. They ought to; they are forced to carry
backbreaking loads for long stretches with little return on their
effort. All one has to do to feel the effects of increased gravity on
a larger mass, is to find and lift a heavy object where one stands
and carry it around a while. In the act of standing, grasping and
then lifting the heavy object, one's total mass with the carried
object becomes greater and thus the feeling of gravity's crush is
intensified. Thus, one can prove one of Newton's basic principles
concerning gravity and corroborating Newton in the process. That is;

Fg
= MmG/r2

Where
Fg is
the total gravitational force

M
is the major mass

m
is the minor mass

r
is the radius between the two centers

and
G is the gravitational constant

NOTE:
The gravitational constant is subject to some controversy when
scrutinized closely, but is good for general purposes and the limits
with which we are dealing. In the above case, G is not a vector, so
in effect can operate either as a pull or a push. It is merely an
expression of a scalar and not a modulus. This could have
implications if the force that causes cosmological accretion on the
scale of the whole cosmos is the same one that holds stars, planets,
solar systems and galaxies together. We could be literally looking at
two sides of the same cosmological force.

There
is another way we can figure things out. Consider that all things
being relative, we can look at masses relative to one another. Look
at the Earth and moon again. By studying the Earth-Moon dance around
each other and determining the barycenter of the system, we can
surmise the real mass of the moon as compared to the Earth, even
though we don’t actually know what is below the lunar surface. We
can see it as a total mass relative to the Earth.

"The
barycenter is said to represent the center of mass of the Earth-Moon
system, and is represented by a theoretical point about which both
the Earth and the Earth's moon orbit as they revolve around the Sun.
The numerical values, the measurements offered for the different
events considered herein, vary according to different astronomers.
But, we shall not concern ourselves with the debate of numbers, but
rather the thrust of the relationship, the proportionality behind the
spacetime events themselves. First of all, by speaking about the
barycenter in these terms, one understands that the event reflects
constant movement. And, even speaking about a theoretical "point",
about which both the Earth and its moon rotate (orbit), is daring,
since no such point actually exists as such, fixed in spacetime for
all space and all time. In fact, the so-called barycenter itself
varies regarding its own placement in relation to the Earth and to
the Earth's moon." (2)

Mass
distance relations of the Earth and Moon and common center of mass

Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto

0.055 0.86 1.0 0.11 318 95 14.5 17.2 0.002

Mass
in Earth masses of the planets

Tables
2. (4)

Thus
we have to take an average value for the system where we take the
mean distance between the Earth and the Moon and find out where the
barycenter is located at that moment. From there we can determine a
ratio of distance from that point for the Earth and the Moon. We can
only compare one relative to the other and vice versa. Given the
relationship of the barycenter where the moon is at perigee, versus
apogee, we can derive an average of 5,525 Km. The semi-major axis (a)
for the orbit of the moon is given as 384,000 Km. The ratio of the
distance between the center of the Earth and the center of the moon
for the barycenter is an average of 1:69.5 approximately. This
differs from the mass ratio of 1:81.3 as calculated from M1:m2. The
gravitational mystery deepens. Clearly, the moon is different enough
from the Earth to create such a result, yet we know that from a
barycenter point of view, the moon has the balancing mass of 1/69.5th
of the Earth. Yet the volumetric mass is some1/81.3rd of
the Earth.

When
bodies are accreting out of dust, the first stage of that growth is
mediated primarily by the electrostatic force. After growing to about
100 Km, gravity starts to take over as the major contributor to the
growth of a body in space, likely in orbit around a star or planet.
For quantum gravity to have an effect therefore, it must be included
in the accretion process at the point before the relativistic
curvature kicks in. We are interested in how it all starts in the
stage of the very small in the case of electrically neutral
particles.

A
probability bell curve can be constructed for possible interactions
that will result in quantum accretion of two non-charged atoms. Two
oppositely pointed and converging arrows represent only two out of
an almost infinite vector input of the possible force input from
virtual manifestation from the Plank False Vacuum. In addition, the
bell curve must be seen in 3D. Two dots are the real particles being
acted upon. The bell curves are displayed for both real particles.
The real particles are close enough for the Casimir effect to occur.
This is not a function graph for quantum gravity, but rather a
probability function of two particles being forced together due to
virtual input from all possible vectors. The greatest probability
results when virtual particle manifestation is such that it forces
real particles directly together. They are all in line. The least
probability results when virtual manifestation occurs at 90 degrees
to the line up of the two real particles. In fact, in this alignment,
they are likely to be driven apart rather than to accrete. All other
vector angles of manifestation represent an increasing or decreasing
probability of accretion.

Conversely,
if the real particles are being driven apart, the top and bottom
arrows would be reversed and the real particles much further apart.
We must keep in mind that interactions that will directly affect
particles are via the leptons, i.e., the electrons and positrons. In
the case of metals, when accretion occurs, binding between atoms
occurs due to electron sharing in the free electron phenomenon. Since
the probability of the above scenario is so rare, it is little wonder
that gravity results in being such a weak force overall. In fact,
there is about as much chance of the nucleus being directly stuck by
a free neutron, as there is for an alignment to allow fundamental
accretion between two neutrally charged atoms. In the early crowded
cosmos, the chance of this occurring was much greater than now, owing
to the closer proximity of a large number of particles. This fact is
important for the early clumping of matter and is observed in the
COBE and WMAPP anisotropic temperature differential maps of the
background cosmic radiation. There were also a large number of
photons that also played a part, particularly in the Casimir effect.
The chances of virtual particles being lined up correctly for any two
real atoms were substantially higher. This created the lumpiness and
the seeds for other processes later on during inflation. Also, the
early creation of elements heavier than H2 allowed for
accretion around these atomic seeds.

It is
easier for the quantum gravitational force to accrete larger lumps of
material as proper interactions have a higher probability of
occurring. Once at the critical distance, then many virtual events
will drive material together. On the atomic gas level, the chances of
an electrical accretion are some 1039 times greater than
for that of quantum gravity. This number may give us a clue as to the
frequency of correctly aligned vector exact discrete events that
occur to create quantum gravity. The difference between quantum
gravity and electrostatic accretion is why electromagnetic phenomena
are so dynamic. A charged gas will allow for accretion much more
quickly from much smaller amounts of matter. As more and more
material accretes into a lump, virtual events increase the chance for
the manifestation of quantum gravity. The effect become noticeable
over macroscopic distances at 100 Km sizes and over where
gravitational effects take over in accretion directly. Eventually,
gravity supercedes electromagnetic accretion in assembling massive
objects.

Indeed,
quantum gravity and gravity as we experience it, is a discrete
phenomena that has phase states, just as any other quantum aspect of
matter and energy. Depending on the level on which we observe,
gravity assumes different functions of strength, being the strongest
at the quantum level and the reverse of what we are familiar with, on
cosmic levels, i.e., an antigravity force. At our level, gravity
follows and an inverse square function over distance. At much shorter
or much greater distances, this relationship breaks down. Where
exactly it breaks down is a matter for discovery and research.

From the Big-Bang it is a rationally commonsensical conjecture that the gravitons, the smallest base primal particles of the universe, must be both mass and energy, i.e. inert mass yet in motion even at the briefest fraction of a second of the pre Big Bang singularity. This is rationally commonsensical since otherwise the Big would not have Banged, the superposition of mass and energy would not have been resolved.

The universe originates, derives and evolves from this energy-mass dualism which is possible and probable due to the small size of the gravitons.

Since gravitation Is the propensity of energy reconversion to mass and energy is mass in motion, gravity is the force exerted between mass formats.

All the matter of the universe is a progeny of the gravitons evolutions, of the natural selection of mass, of some of the mass formats attaining temporary augmented energy constraint in their successive generations, with energy drained from other mass formats, to temporarily postpone, survive, the reversion of their own constitutional mass to the pool of cosmic energy fueling the galactic clusters expansion set in motion by the Big Bang.

I have some very new and intresting data for you to crunch that will give you not only the answers you seek but also prove to you that Plank, Einstine, Newton, Tesla and more intrestingly Nostradarmus and many others all had the precise answers you seek and like them all they have hidden this fact that they all new within there cryptics, its all very simple when you understand the Hetrodynamics of atomic rerfractory factors and the rules that one must apply to your schermatics, this then gives you the equation that you can use that will fitt to all the above giving you the precise answer to where gravity is generated and how and by what it also gives you the precise answer to the scientific god factor, it also opens up new doors to a much more fablious power upon which I am concentrating upon at presant uterlizing slit photonic fusion, I like Newton am no scientest but a nature philosopher and I have gained the above knowlage in isolation directly from mother nature herself its all there right infront of you all you have to do is look observe, or conversly I can give it to you then you can relook with a differant vision this is no prank and I donnot loke about such matters cheers I enjoyed the read thanks

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)

Google AdSense Host API

This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

Facebook Login

You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

Maven

This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.

Conversion Tracking Pixels

We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics

Author Google Analytics

This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)

Comscore

ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)

Amazon Tracking Pixel

Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)