In Marootian v. New York Life Insurance Company it was argued that time barred the proceedings and that the policies had clauses stating that the French or English courts had jurisdiction in the event of litigation.
New York Life Company se argumentó que el tiempo transcurrido invalidaba las medidas judiciales y que había cláusulas en las pólizas que afirmaban que los tribunales franceses e ingleses tenían jurisdicción en el caso de litigio.
No caso Marootian vs New York Life Insurance Company argumentou-se que o tempo barrava as medidas judiciais e que havia cláusulas nas apólices afirmando que tribunais franceses ou ingleses tinham jurisdição em caso de litígio.