A 60-year-old, otherwise healthy male patient presented with a painless swelling near the lower lid of his left eye at the ophthalmology clinic of Ohud hospital in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. At that time, he had had the swelling for almost 3 years. He had no similar swelling elsewhere in the body and no history of any malignancy in the past ().\nOn examination, the swelling was a superficial, non-tender, pink-colored nodule located horizontally on the tarsal plate of the left lower eyelid. It measured 2 cm x 1.5 cm x 1 cm and was mobile and firm in consistency. The swelling clinically resembled a benign lesion. The rest of the ocular examination was unremarkable in both eyes.\nThe excision biopsy of the lesion revealed a 2.5 cm x 1.5 cm x 1.3 cm mass. On the cut surface, a well-circumscribed, 2 cm x 1 cm x 0.8 cm grayish-white, firm tumor was seen in the center with 5millimeter (mm) surgical margins on all sides. A histological examination of the tumor showed overlying thinned-out epidermis, beneath which were seen sheets, cords and nodules of tumor cells lying in the pool of extracellular mucin (). At places, the cells showed cords, papillae and tubule formation, the tumor cells showed mild atypia and occasional mitotic figures; no necrosis was seen (), and all the surgical margins were free from the tumor. A diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma was made. A wide range of immunohistochemistry panels were run to confirm the diagnosis. The tumor cells were strongly positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7), cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), tumor protein 63 (p63), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and were negative for cytokeratin 20 (CK20) (). To investigate the possibility that this tumor did not represent a metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma, the patient underwent a complete metastatic work-up which included, computed tomography (CT) of chest and abdomen, Positron emission tomography (PET) scan, esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and sigmoidoscopy; no abnormalities were detected. The final diagnosis of a Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the eyelid was given.\nConsidering the age of the patient and the long duration and gradually increasing size of the swelling, the patient was scheduled for a wide local excision with free surgical margins and referred to the King Fahad Hospital in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah.\nFor the past year, the patient has been on a regular follow-up schedule and is clinically free from the disease at present.
A 71-year-old man visited our hospital with a raised nodular mass of size 2×3×1 cm in his left groin and an erythematous area of 9×10 cm over the left groin (). He had first noticed the erythema and nodules 6 months before he visited our hospital. The erythema had gradually expanded in size. Ulceration with intermittent bleeding was noted within the nodular mass. On physical examination, edema of the left leg was observed, and lymph nodes in both inguinal regions were palpable. The results of routine hematological and biochemical examinations were normal. Examination of skin biopsies from the inguinal folds revealed features of EMPD in the epidermis and underlying glandular neoplastic foci in the reticular dermis and in the subcutaneous adipose tissue (). Moreover, focal angiovascular invasion was noted. Typical Paget cells were scattered in the epidermis (). The glandular neoplastic foci resembled carcinoma in situ. Some foci showed accumulation of secretion in central regions (). The tumor cells exhibited abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and large vesicular nuclei.\nThe tumor and Paget cells showed strong positive immunohistochemical staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial membrane antigen, cytokeratin 7 (CK7), and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) () but were negative for melanin-A, S-100, and CK20 (). The patient was diagnosed with apocrine carcinoma related with extensive EMPD. Chest radiography, abdomino-pelvic computed tomography (CT), a gallium scan, a bone scan, and positron emission tomography-CT were performed to exclude the presence of internal malignancy. The results showed multiple lung, bone, and lymph node metastases. After consultation with a urologist and a surgeon, we concluded that this patient was inoperable, and opted for conservative treatment; however, the patient refused any treatment.