Our study presents an interesting case of a seventeen-year-old girl who was referred to the child psychiatry clinic with symptoms of depression and suicide attempt by taking medical pills. The patient was transferred to institutionalized care owing to intra-familial events. She had consistent problems of adaptation to the institutional surroundings and could not get along well with other children. As a result, she did not attend the school and displayed aggressive behaviours. At the initial psychiatric evaluation, she looked tired and sad with untidy hair and unkempt clothes. Her mood was clearly depressive and consistent with her affect. During the interview, she was reluctant, had minimal eye contact and answered with a subdued voice. She explained the reason for her suicidal behaviour that she blamed her loneliness and stated that she could not stand living anymore. During interview, no active suicidal ideations, delusions or hallucinations was observed. During the first interview, Beck Depression score was 44, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)-1 score was 40 and STAI-2 score was 38. Based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria, she was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder and treatment with fluoxetine (20 mg/day), and aripiprazole (5 mg/day) was started. Two months after the initiation of the treatment, fluoxetine was doubled (40 mg/day) and this treatment regime was continued for subsequent four months, with aripiprazole (5 mg/day). This resulted in regression of depressive symptoms. During the next follow-up interview, she reported not having menstrual cycles for the past four months. Therefore, she was referred to an obstetrician immediately. She had no reports of menstrual irregularity, hirsutism, drug use or history of any related medical disorder prior to the treatment. There, she underwent pelvic ultrasonography examination which showed normal ovaries and endometrium. Analysis of blood test reports showed normal functions of thyroid, liver and kidney. Her pregnancy test was also negative. No pathology was detected in cranial magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, the pathology was reasoned to very high prolactin level in blood serum, which was shown to be 74 ng/ml, while the normal range being 4–20 ng/ml. After ruling out other possible causes of hyperprolactinemia, aripiprazole treatment was thought to be responsible for the observed symptoms. As an immediate change in therapy, aripiprazole was replaced with quetiapine (200 mg/day). Aripiprazole replacement successfully resulted in reduction of blood prolactin levels to 17 ng/ml and menstrual cycle returned to normal after two months of quetiapine treatment.
A 36-year-old woman with two children visited a psychiatric outpatient clinic on an ambulatory basis. She had no history of endocrine or reproductive pathology or psychiatric problems. Although she had been receiving a conservative treatment for iron deficiency anemia and transient hematuria, there was no specific hematologic and nephrologic finding and she had not taken any dopamine antagonistic agents including gastrointestinal motility drugs and antipsychotic agents except ferrous sulfate. Her son had been diagnosed with pervasive development disorder and mental retardation. She had suffered symptoms of depressed mood, nihilistic ideation, decreased volition, decreased psychomotor activity, loss of appetite, and sleep disturbance, which occurred after her son's diagnosis 2 years ago. Diagnostic tests were performed to ascertain whether she had neurologic or any other systemic organic disease that could explain her symptoms. Following a detailed psychiatric examination with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), escitalopram 10 mg per day was prescribed to the patient with the diagnosis of major depressive disorder. She scored 26 on the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HRSD), and 25 on the Beck depression inventory (BDI)., After 2 weeks of medication, her complaints declined, her HRSD score was 18 and her BDI score further decreased to 20. However, she developed galactorrhea with breast pain (the nonpuerperal discharge of milk-containing fluid from the breast). She had no history of galactorrhea. She first noticed the discharge on treatment day 14 and described it as white-creamy and from both nipples. She did not notice any bloody, greenish, or foul-smelling discharge nor report sexual dysfunction. She consulted her gynecologist, who recommended mammography and breast ultrasonography. The results of these tests were normal. However, serum prolactin level on treatment day 14 was 200 ng/mL (reference range: 1.2-24.2 ng/mL). There were no abnormalities in blood chemistry, thyroid function tests, or electrocardiogram. She was recommended to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hypothalamic/pituitary area to exclude mass lesions. However, she refused the test, which was not done. Because her galactorrhea developed after initiations of her medication with escitalopram, we stopped her medication. After cessation of the medication, the discharge abated and breast pain was relieved. Her serum prolactin level decreased to 2.38 ng/mL five days after discontinuing escitalopram.