A 16-year-old male with free medical history presented as an outpatient requesting for consultation regarding a small lump that he palpated two months ago in his right hemiscrotum during self-examination. He did not report any trauma or inflammation of the area neither at the referred period nor in the past. Except for mild discomfort in the hemiscrotum during exercise that subsided after its discontinuation, no other symptoms were reported. Importantly, the size of the lump did not change significantly during this two-month period.\nPhysical examination revealed a small, round, hazelnut-sized, painless mass in the right hemiscrotum, localized in the tail of the epididymis. No other pathological signs were detected at the rest of the scrotum, testicles, or groin.\nU/S examination of the scrotum documented the presence of a solid hypoperfused, hyperechoic, well-demarcated, without invasive behavior mass, localized at the tail of the epididymis, 1.3 × 1.1 cm in size, and including 2 small hypoechoic lesions inside the mass (arrows, ).\nThe typical preoperative laboratory examination (blood routine and coagulation profile) and the values of the specific tumor markers AFP, LDH, CEA, and b-HCG were normal. Surgical treatment was decided and a right scrotal exploration was performed. Macroscopic examination revealed a yellowish uncapsulated mass with maximum diameter of 13 mm located next to the tail of the epididymis ().\nAfter meticulous dissection, the mass was totally dissociated from the epididymis and was excised en-block without any damage to adjacent structures.\nHistological examination of the mass revealed the presence of cuboidal epithelial cells in tubular clusters into a fibrous stroma (). Immunohistochemical evaluation was positive for tumor markers HMBE1 and calretinin, which documented the diagnosis of adenomatoid tumor and its mesothelial origin.\nPostoperative course was uneventful. After a 24-month follow-up period, the patient remains asymptomatic without signs of recurrence.
A 39-year-old male presented with a palpable mass in the right side of the scrotum. There was no history suggestive of urinary infection, genito-urinary tuberculosis or epididymo-orchitis. On local examination, a mass was identified in the right testis which was 2×1.5 cm in size, firm in consistency and well-marginated with smooth swelling. The overlying skin and surrounding adenexa appeared normal. Serum levels of AFP and β-HCG were within normal limits. Scrotal ultrasound revealed a solid mass in the epididymal body of the right scrotum that was hypoechoic compared with the testicular parenchyma.