A 32-year old male with unremarkable past clinical history presents with persistent thrombocytosis (Hb = 15.6 g/dL; Hct = 46.1%; WBC = 6.76 × 109/L; Plt = 745 × 109/L; Epo and LDH levels within normal ranges). JAK2 mutation is detected (VAF = 10.1%) on peripheral blood granulocytes. A BM biopsy (a–c) features striking hypocellularity without morphologic atypia. A slight decrease in the myeloid-to-erythroid ratio is noted with mildly increased, polymorphic megakaryocytes consisting of mature-looking to giant, hyperlobulated forms. There is no evidence of BM fibrosis and CD34+ blasts are not increased. The clinicopathologic synopsis supports MPN, but the very unusual morphologic picture favors a provisional diagnosis of MPN-U. Hypocellularity is uncommon in clonal myeloid disorders in general and barely reported in both early and chronic phase MPN. It may nonetheless be encountered in late-stage disease with the classical picture of MF with myeloid metaplasia. In this setting, the BM niche is overwhelmed by the stromal component with consequent peripheralization of hematopoietic cells. In the current case, the diagnosis of MPN is strongly supported by the laboratory findings, by the presence of a driver mutation, and by megakaryocyte morphology. Even though most clues point towards ET, the relative increase in the erythroid progenitors and Hb levels at the upper limit of normal cannot definitively rule out early phase PV with ET-like presentation and very atypical BM morphology.
A 32-year old pregnant woman refers to the Emergency Unit for abdominal pain. Sonography reveals SVT of the splenic-portal axis and blood tests disclose anemia (Hb = 10.5 g/dL; Hct = 32%), leukocytosis (WBC = 18.2 × 109/L), and thrombocytosis (Plt = 596 × 109/L) with low Epo levels (3.3 mU/mL [4.3–29]), and JAK2 mutation. A BM biopsy (a–c) discloses PV changes with hypercellularity, expansion of the three hematopoietic lineages, clustering of polymorphic megakaryocytes, and no fibrosis. Despite this, the lack of the first major criterion hampers a formal diagnosis of PV.\nThe present case depicts the prototypic features of “masked PV”, presenting with SVT. A further bias is the concurrent pregnancy, which itself favors deep vein thrombosis. Such a clinical event may occur in any subtype of MPN, either at diagnosis or during the course of the disease. A higher thrombotic risk is related to a hyperinflammatory state and neutrophilia, which are more commonly experienced in PV []. Besides the diagnostic issues, it should be stressed that thrombotic events pose the highest threat for patients with early phase MPN. Despite the risk factors for vascular events are only partially defined, major determinants include JAK2 status, age, neutrophil count, and a positive history of thrombosis [,,].