The patient, a 41-year-old woman with a non-relevant past medical history, concluded her fourth pregnancy by cesarean delivery owing to macrosomic product (July 2013). Tubal ligation was performed on postoperative day one by the Kroener fimbriectomy method, which coursed uneventfully and without any remarkable findings. The specimens obtained were sent for routine histopathological assessment, and the patient was discharged after full recovery. To date she is healthy and without any complaints.\nBoth distal tubes and fimbriae were identified; the large tube was bulky with a nodular appearance (3.5×2×1.3 cm) (). Transverse sections taken from this dilated duct revealed an overfilled lumen with a caramel-like substance surrounding an ill-defined peripheral spot, which, when seen under a magnifying glass, showed a fractal pattern similar to a snowflake (). Histologically, this hazy frame was sketched by a slender stalk with progressively branching papillae lined by columnar non-ciliated cells with plump eosinophilic cytoplasm showing focal pseudostratification and budding (, ). The nuclei of these cells were centrally located, enlarged, and rounded or oval. The nuclei displayed a variable appearance, either dense and hyperchromatic, or vesicular with a prominent nucleolus, and sometimes having coarse chromatin, membrane foldings, pseudoinclusions or grooves. Mitotic activity was not identified.\nDespite the presence of luminal extracellular mucin, several subnuclear mucin-filled vacuoles were also identified, occasionally expanding into cyst-like structures (). Periodic acid– Schiff and Alcian blue stains highlighted the extracellular and intracellular mucin, while the intracytoplasmic vacuoles were stained with Mayer’s mucicarmine (–).\nImmunoperoxidase stains demonstrated an intensely positive reaction for cytokeratin cocktail (CK AE1/AE3) in the membrane and cytoplasm () of cells, as well as for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) with weak cytoplasmic expression and luminal border reinforcement (). Detection of progesterone receptors (PR) was markedly positive in 95% of cells, while estrogen receptors (ER) and androgen receptors were moderately and weakly positive in 70% and 10% of cells, respectively (–). The proliferation index labeled with Ki-67 was rated in approximately 3% of cells (). Surprisingly, cyclin D1 staining was observed in nearly 90% of cells (). No reaction was detected toward a variety of factors, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), human chorionic gonadotropin, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/Neu), or B-cell lymphoma 2 protein (Bcl-2).\nAccordingly, the proliferation was diagnosed as a metaplastic papillary tumor of the Fallopian tube, with a note to the clinician about the benign behavior of the alteration.
The patient is a 25-year-old woman, gravida 0, who was referred to the gynecology oncology division at Chonnam National University Hospital with lower abdominal pain and abdominal mass. Her gynecologic history was unremarkable. Physical examination was notable for abdominal mass that was near at xiphoid process. Pelvic ultrasound revealed about more than 20 cm cystic mass. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis revealed about 23×21×9 cm sized serous borderline cystic tumor in the right ovary and 2.2 cm corpus luteum of the left ovary. There was no remarkable findings in the uterus and no abnormal pelvic lymphadenopathy. The tumor marker profile was as follows: CA-125 38.2 U/mL (0-35). Another tumor markers and the result of hematological analyses were within their normal ranges.\nExploration of the abdominopelvic cavity revealed about 23 cm sized brownish fluid contained cyst located within the right fallopian tube. Its surface was clear and on cut section, it had multiple papillary growing in inner surface (). The left ovary had about 1 cm sized whitish nodule. A right salpingectomy, left ovary wedge biopsy, appendectomy and cytology were performed. A frozen section of the right fallopian tube revealed a serous borderline tumor. And a frozen section of the left ovary revealed a fibroma. Exploration of the right ovary and left tube was unremarkable, and, in view of patient's age and desire for future fertility, no further surgical procedure was undertaken. Histologically, right tubal mass was serous borderline tumor and appendix uninvolved by tumor cells and cytology of peritoneal washing fluid was negative for malignant cells. Tumor had cystic change and papillary nodules. On microscopic examination the papillae were covered by serous type of epithelium (), displaying stratification and budding with focal nuclear atypia (). There was no invasion of the supportive stroma of the papillae or into the fallopian tube wall. Micropapillary pattern of the tumor was absent and there was no papillary tubal hyperplasia in the fallopian tube. In general, the histology of the tumor was similar to that of an ovarian borderline serous tumor. Pathologic diagnosis was serous borderline tumor of the right fallopian tube. Close follow-up was recommended and currently, the patient's postoperative recovery was uneventful.