An eighty-one-year-old male visited the clinic complaining of abdominal pain along with pulsating mass. He had been diagnosed with infrarenal aortic aneurysm and this was treated with EVAR 6 years previously. After EVAR, a gradual increasing of the aneurysm sac was found without evidence of any type of endoleak. Eventually, the aneurysm reached a diameter of 9.7 cm on the computed tomography (CT) angiography and abdominal pain redeveloped. CT angiography showed a huge aortic aneurysm without evidence of endoleak, and it was considered that this was due to endotension.\nCT-guided sac aspiration was performed through the translumbar puncture of the aneurysm sac, and 400 mL of a dark brown-colored liquid was aspirated (). CT scan was performed the day after the puncture and the sac shrunk back to its original size (). Abdominal pain subsided and the palpating mass disappeared. One month after the aspiration, a CT scan was retaken, and the scan showed that the aneurysm sac increased back to the size before the aspiration (). Additionally, the scan showed no signs of endoleak. A second aspiration was performed again, and a further 300 mL of the dark brown colored fluid was aspirated. During the second aspiration, small amounts of contrast media was administered through the lumbar puncture site in order to search for the presence of collateral flow induced endoleak and to detect any possible rupture of the aneurysm sac. But no contrast media leakage from the sac was found, and no endoleak was found. So it was concluded that the increase of the aneurismal sac was due to endotension.\nFinally, with the consent of the patient, the endovascular relining technique was performed on the patient to treat the endotension. Since the diameter of the main body of the original endograft was 28 mm, it was planned that the relining process would be carried out by inserting two customized, tubular stent-grafts each of 14 mm in diameter. The length of the relining stent-graft was calculated to cover not only the whole length of the original stent-graft but to cover the entire growing sac. The patient was put under general anesthesia, and both common femoral arteries were punctured and selection of both limbs of the original stent-graft was attempted. Unexpectedly, the guide wire escaped from the junction area of the left module to the aneurysm sac. Upon inspection, a modular disconnection was found at the left graft junction area resulting in large amounts of leakage from the disconnected area. The original main body was selected with difficulty, and two 14-mm- × 12-cm-sized stent-grafts were successfully implanted within the original endograft (). Ancillary attachment between the original and the new stent-grafts was made with a compliant balloon. A final aortogram was performed and no endoleak was detected and the leakage from the modular disconnection disappeared after the endovascular relining. The day after the procedure, CT angiography showed no endoleak but retroperitoneal hematoma around the aneurysm sac was found. It was determined that the contained aneurismal sac rupture and the retroperitoneal hematoma were caused by the leakage from the modular disconnection.\nSerial review of the plain x-rays taken since the initial EVAR 6 years prior showed very subtle but gradual modular migration unnoticeable by eye, and complete disconnection developed within 5 days between the day of the second aspiration and the relining procedure. It was determined that the modular disconnection was a result of the aspiration (). The patient showed no symptoms or signs of aneurysm sac rupture after the procedure and was discharged with no further complications. CT scan taken four months after the relining procedure showed no endoleak and the size of the aneurysm sac decreased from 9.7 to 9.3 cm.
The patient was an 83-year-old man with a surgical history of aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery who had been taking anticoagulants (apixaban) and beta-blockers (bisoprolol) since said surgery. He was diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer at another medical facility, and computed tomography (CT) was performed for further generalized testing, which indicated an AAA (76 mm) and right internal iliac aneurysm (IIA); EVAR (Endurant II®, Medtronic Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, USA) and right IIA coil embolization were performed in the same year. The operation was completed with aortography showing no EL immediately after the procedure. On the follow-up CT, the aneurysm diameter enlarged, but no overt EL was indicated on repeat examination and testing with ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT, and aortography.\nFour years after EVAR, the aneurysm diameter enlarged to 100×94 mm. Type II EL was suspected, and treatment intervention was planned. Embolization was performed on the root of the inferior mesenteric artery via the superior mesenteric artery using a metal coil and n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) diluted 4-fold with lipiodol. In addition, 4-fold-diluted NBCA was similarly used to perform embolization of the vasa vasorum, imaged from the lumbar artery via the lateral sacral artery (). However, the aneurysm diameter increased further after these treatments. Magnetic resonance imaging showed uniform high-signal intensity inside the aneurysm on both T1- and T2-weighted images. Thus, the contents of the aneurysm were judged to be hematoma, and direct fine-needle aspiration was performed 5 years after EVAR. A total of 320 mL of dark-red and serous liquid was aspirated from inside the aneurysm (); the main blood component of the aspirated liquid was red blood cells. In addition, a pigtail catheter was inserted inside the aneurysm, and contrast-enhanced imaging was performed. However, the blood vessels that branched from the aneurysm were not shown on the images. The aneurysm diameter decreased temporarily as a result of fine-needle aspiration, but 8 months later, it increased again to its previous size. The likelihood of type II EL was considered to be low, considering the course of treatment up to this time. Also, because the contents of the aneurysm were uniform blood components, perigraft seroma was ruled out. Type Ia or III EL was believed to be possible, a shepherd-hook-type catheter was hooked onto the top edge of the central side of the stent graft, and aortography was repeated around the entire area. However, the images showed no EL, and type Ia was ruled out. Next, contrast-enhanced imaging was performed on the joining part from inside the legs, but it also showed no EL, and type IIIa was ruled out. Without being able to completely rule out type IIIb, an aortic cuff and stent-graft leg (GORE® Excluder®, W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) were combined as a diagnostic treatment, and the stent graft that was initially inserted was covered around its entire circumference (). In a subsequent follow-up, a slight decrease in the aneurysm diameter was found.