Mr. S is a 31-year-old, single, unemployed gentleman from a low socioeconomic Tamil-speaking background, who first came to psychiatric hospital in 2003 at the age of 17 years within 10 days of onset of symptoms of psychosis and mania. He was treated with tablet risperidone up to 4 mg/day. He responded well and even went back to school. After 9 months of regular treatment, he stopped medicines. Two months after stopping of medicines he had relapse of psychotic symptoms including Schniderian first rank symptoms without any mood symptoms. His diagnosis was revised to paranoid schizophrenia. He failed trials of tablet risperidone 8 mg/day, tablet olanzepine 25 mg/day, a course of 10 sittings of electroconvulsive therapy, and injection fluphenazine decanoate depot 100 mg intramuscular every month. He did not show significant improvement. He was started on tablet clozapine and the dose was gradually built up to 450 mg/day by 2007. He was on regular follow-up for 9 years during which he had fluctuations in psychiatric symptoms but was managing well without any physical health issues.\nIn 2016, he developed pain in the left lumbar region following trivial trauma (while using a crowbar) and later developed a swelling in the region for which incision and drainage were done at a primary health center. When the ulcer did not heal for about 3 months, he was referred to a surgical department of a teaching hospital for further management. The non-healing ulcer in the incision site of left lumbar gradually had increased in size and was associated with passage of air through the ulcer while defecating or straining. There was no history of abdominal distension, vomiting, obstipation, hematemeis, malena, or fever. Physical examination revealed a soft non-tender abdomen.\nRoentgenogram of abdomen and ultrasonography investigations revealed a foreign body in the abdominal cavity just below the diaphragm without any other features of obstruction or perforation. Contrast-enhanced computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a linear foreign body forming a fistula communicating with splenic flexure of the colon [].\nThe patient was posted for elective exploratory laparotomy. On laparotomy, an intact ball point pen of size about 11 cm in length was found to be the foreign body with its tip inside the lumen of splenic flexure and its rear end facing the external ulcer []. The pen was carefully delivered through the external wound and the sealed perforation of size 1 × 1 cm was closed primarily []. Postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the 11th postoperative day.\nThe patient recollected that he had swallowed the very same pen in 2004 when he had been very psychotic []. He reported that he had vague abdomen pain on and off, which he did not feel serious enough to report. There was no record of abdomen pain in the patient's case notes over the previous 13 years.\nHe is doing physically well and is on regular follow-up. He is not regularly employed but helps his family in household chores. He is currently on clozapine 450 mg/day, on which he has a serum level was 933 ng/mL.
A 47-year-old Iranian woman presented to our hospital with the chief complaint of pain in the abdomen (mostly in the epigastric area) for the previous 2 days, associated with recurrent vomiting, nausea, and anorexia. Her complaints had started 2 hours after the accidental ingestion of a dental prosthesis about 2 days before admission (Fig. ). The patient has a known history of asthma and migraine headache and a history of wearing artificial dentures. At the time of admission, she was conscious and oriented to time, place, and person. Her pulse rate was 90 beats per minute, and her blood pressure was 100/60 mmHg. Her physical examination revealed severe epigastric and mild right upper quadrant abdominal tenderness.\nA radiograph showed no free gas under the right dome of the diaphragm and no air-fluid level (Fig. ). Ultrasonography revealed that there was no free fluid in the peritoneal cavity. Spiral abdominal computed tomography (CT) with oral and intravenous contrast revealed duodenal wall thickness in D2–4, peripheral mesenteric fat edema, hematoma in D1–3, air in the intestinal wall, pneumoretroperitoneum, laceration in D1–2 and a part of D3, and microperforations in D2–3. Because of the hematoma, narrowing in the primary and middle parts of the duodenum was seen (Figs. and ).\nVideo endoscopic findings were an old healed linear ulcer scar in the bulb of the duodenum, and also a swallowed lodged denture was seen in D2–3 after a papilla, which left a laceration behind. An attempt to capture the foreign body was not possible because of difficulty in the procedure and the chance of induced laceration, so a gastroenterologist recommended surgical evacuation of the denture. Laboratory investigation results are shown in Table .\nAfter preparation of the operation site, a midline laparotomy was performed. The stomach and small bowel were examined carefully for any perforation, but no pathology was revealed; however, a foreign body was palpable between the second and the third portions of the duodenum inside the lumen, so duodenal kocherization was performed to explore the duodenum for any perforations. There was no gross perforation in the duodenal wall, so the foreign body was pushed through the lumen to pass back to the stomach from the pylorus. A gastrostomy was performed, and the foreign body was removed and identified as an artificial denture (Fig. ). Then the stomach was repaired in two layers. Washing with normal saline was done, and an abdominal drain was placed at the duodenal site of kocherization. The patient recovered well postoperatively and was discharged on the ninth day of her total hospitalization in good condition.