A 50-year-old male with past medical history of ischemic heart disease and prasugrel hypersensitivity in the form of generalized rash underwent elective PCI with one drug-eluting stent (DES) to the left anterior descending artery (LAD). He was subsequently started on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 81 mg daily and ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day.\nTwo days following discharge, the patient was complaining of severe shortness of breath with minimal exertion, and occasionally at rest. He denied any fevers, chills, productive cough, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea or lower limb edema. The patient’s dyspnea was heavily investigated with basic labs, cardiac biomarkers, imaging of the chest, and repeat transthoracic echocardiogram. All results came back within normal limits. The patient’s dyspnea was deemed secondary to ticagrelor use and the drug was discontinued, with subsequent improvement of his symptoms. Given his history of prasugrel hypersensitivity and current intolerance to ticagrelor, the patient was started on clopidogrel. Three days later, he presented to the emergency department (ED) with a rash that started on his chest and spread to his arms and face (Figure ).\nThe patient was diagnosed with cutaneous hypersensitivity to clopidogrel. Given the patient’s need for dual antiplatelet therapy and previously documented prasugrel hypersensitivity as well as intolerance to ticagrelor, shifting to any of them was not an option.\nReviewing the literature, three management strategies have been described for clopidogrel hypersensitivity, including switching to another agent, implementing a desensitization protocol, and a six-day course of steroids without clopidogrel discontinuation. A shared decision was made to implement the latter approach however with a slow taper over a three-week period. The patient was started on oral prednisone 30 mg twice a day for five days, followed by a decrease of 5 mg/day every three days for 15 days. On his one-week follow-up, the patient was well-tolerating clopidogrel with complete resolution of his symptoms and no significant side effects from steroids. The patient showed no side effects related to steroids on his one-month follow-up.
A 44-year-old South Asian male with no significant medical or family history presented to the emergency department with typical chest pain and shortness of breath. He did not report any significant social history, and his review of systems was unremarkable. His vital signs indicated systolic blood pressures of 156/92 mmHg, heart rate of 108 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 20 breaths per minute, with an oxygen saturation of 97% on room air. The brief physical examination was normal. An emergency 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed marked, 6-millimeter ST-segment elevation in leads V1-V6 with reciprocal ST-depressions in the inferior leads, II, III, and aVF.\nHe was immediately administered oral aspirin, ticagrelor load, high-intensity rosuvastatin in addition to an intravenous nitroglycerin infusion and subsequently proceeded for primary PCI. During cardiac catheterization, it was discovered that the patient had the much dreaded "widow-maker" lesion - a proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery occlusion with high-grade thrombus burden. He successfully underwent transfemoral drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation after thrombus aspiration with a Boston Scientific Corporation (Marlborough, Massachusetts) SYNERGY® everolimus DES.\nPost-procedure, the patient developed translucent bullous lesions with surrounding erythema on the distal flexor aspect of the right forearm, for which he promptly received intravenous hydrocortisone and chlorphenamine. At this juncture, the tentative diagnosis was a contrast-media reaction (Ultravist®️ 370, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany). During the subsequent hospitalization, the patient was hemodynamically stable. He was subsequently discharged on guideline-directed medical therapy on DAPT with ticagrelor, high-intensity statin, low-dose beta-blocker, and angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in addition to oral antihistamine and topical steroid cream therapies. A skin biopsy was not performed, as there were no available dermatologists during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.\nThe patient contacted the interventional cardiologist one-week post-procedure and alerted him that the lesions were worsening despite the therapies. At that time, a measured decision was taken to transition him to clopidogrel (loading dose of 300 milligrams, followed by daily maintenance dose, 75 milligrams) and rivaroxaban 2.5 milligrams twice daily. Over the following four days, the bullous lesions spontaneously ruptured, with resolving erythema and induration. After a further three-day period, the lesions almost fully healed with areas of hyperpigmentation. There was no generalized body or mucosal involvement. Provocation tests with ticagrelor were not performed (Figure ).