A 51-year-old male presented to MDACC for evaluation of a left upper eyelid mass. On review of the outside needle core biopsy sections, scant histiocytoid cells (CK7 positive) were noted percolating among normal lacrimal gland tissues. The microscopic assessment was a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with indeterminate origin due to the limited biopsy sample. An MRI of orbit and face showed an infiltrative lesion involving pre- and postseptal regions of the left upper and lower eyelids, the lacrimal gland, and the focal intraconal extension (). The patient's previous PET/CT scan was negative for a second malignancy. Exenteration of the left orbit with intraoperative evaluation of the margins was performed. Macroscopically, the tumor measured 5.5 × 2.5 cm. Histopathologically, clusters of atypical histiocytoid cells involving the dermis, tarsus, palpebral conjunctival, and periorbital soft tissues were present (). Despite wide excision beyond the clinically visible mass, tumor cells were seen along the cauterized resection margins. Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation therapy was completed, and at 12-month follow-up, there was no evidence of recurrence.
A 51-year-old male patient presented to the outpatient clinic with a painless nodule near the right lower eyelid. The mass had grown slowly over the past 3 years, and measured 0.9×0.7 cm during examination (). The lesion appeared benign in clinical examination, and under local anesthesia, the patient underwent a 3-mm-margin elliptical excision and primary closure. Histologic study of this first specimen revealed epithelial cell islands floating in a mucin lake, with the final diagnosis being mucinous carcinoma. The epithelial component showed a solid and cribriform growth pattern and the tumor cells revealed moderate nuclear atypia and a mitotic aspect. Additional immunostaining study revealed that the tumor cells were immunopositive for cytokeratins (CK)-7 and negative for CK-20 with 10% Ki-67 positivity in the active area (). We performed re-excision of the surgical site with an additional 3-mm margin, which was free of malignant histology. The possibility of a metastatic primary mucinous carcinoma (e.g., breast or gastrointestinal tract) could not be completely ruled out, but a systemic evaluation by positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed no other suspected site of malignancy. During a close follow-up over 2 years, the patient did not experience any postoperative complication or recurrence ().