human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: : No currently available treatment provides consistent relief of irritable bowel syndrome . Colonic sensory and motor function are modulated partly through 5HT3‐receptors Background The approximately 1100 medical journals now active in China are publishing a rapidly increasing number of research reports , including many studies identified by their authors as r and omized controlled trials . It has been noticed that these reports mostly present positive results , and their quality and authenticity have consequently been called into question . We investigated the adequacy of r and omization  of clinical trials published in recent years in China to determine how many of them met acceptable st and ards for allocating participants to treatment groups . Methods The China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic data base was search ed for reports of r and omized controlled trials on 20 common diseases published from January 1994 to June 2005 . From this sample , a subset of trials that appeared to have used r and omization methods was selected . Twenty-one investigators trained in the relevant knowledge , communication skills and quality control issues interviewed the original authors of these trials about the participant r and omization methods and related quality -control features of their trials . Results From an initial sample of 37,313 articles identified in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure data base , we found 3137 apparent r and omized controlled trials . Of these , 1452 were studies of conventional medicine ( published in 411 journals ) and 1685 were studies of traditional Chinese medicine ( published in 352 journals ) . Interviews with the authors of 2235 of these reports revealed that only 207 studies adhered to accepted methodology for r and omization and could on those grounds be deemed authentic r and omized controlled trials ( 6.8 % , 95 % confidence interval 5.9–7.7 ) . There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of authenticity between r and omized controlled trials of traditional interventions and those of conventional interventions . R and omized controlled trials conducted at hospitals affiliated to medical universities were more likely to be authentic than trials conducted at level 3 and level 2 hospitals ( relative risk 1.58 , 95 % confidence interval 1.18–2.13 , and relative risk 14.42 , 95 % confidence interval 9.40–22.10 , respectively ) . The likelihood of authenticity was higher in level 3 hospitals than in level 2 hospitals ( relative risk 9.32 , 95 % confidence interval 5.83–14.89 ) . All r and omized controlled trials of pre-market drug clinical trial were authentic by our criteria . Of the trials conducted at university-affiliated hospitals , 56.3 % were authentic ( 95 % confidence interval 32.0–81.0 ) . Conclusion Most reports of r and omized controlled trials published in some Chinese journals lacked an adequate description of r and omization . Similarly , most so called ' r and omized controlled trials ' were not real r and omized controlled trials owing toa lack of adequate underst and ing on the part of the authors of rigorous clinical trial design . All r and omized controlled trials of pre-market drug clinical trial included in this research were authentic . R and omized controlled trials conducted by authors in high level hospitals , especially in hospitals affiliated to medical universities had a higher rate of authenticity . That so many non-r and omized controlled trials were published as r and omized controlled trials reflected the fact that peer review needs to be improved and a good practice guide for peer review including how to identify the authenticity of the study urgently needs to be developed OBJECTIVES : This study aim ed to compare the effects of true and sham acupuncture in relieving symptoms of  irritable bowel syndrome ( IBS ) .  METHODS : A total of 230 adult IBS patients ( 75 % females , average age : 38.4 years ) were r and omly assigned to 3 weeks of true or sham acupuncture ( 6 treatments ) after a 3-week “ run-in ” with sham acupuncture in an “ augmented ” or “ limited ” patient – practitioner interaction . A third arm of the study included a waitlist control group . The primary outcome was the IBS Global Improvement Scale ( IBS-GIS ) ( range : 1–7 ) ; secondary outcomes included the IBS Symptom Severity Scale ( IBS-SSS ) , the IBS Adequate Relief ( IBS-AR ) , and the IBS Quality of Life ( IBS-QOL ) . RESULTS : Although there was no statistically significant difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture on the IBS-GIS ( 41 vs. 32 % , P=0.25 ) , both groups improved significantly compared with the waitlist control group ( 37 vs. 4 % , P=0.001 ) . Similarly , small differences that were not statistically significant favored acupuncture over the other three outcomes : IBS-AR ( 59 vs. 57 % , P=0.83 ) , IBS-SSS ( 31 vs. 21 % , P=0.18 ) , and IBS-QOL ( 17 vs. 13 % , P=0.56 ) . Eliminating responders during the run-in period did not substantively change the results . Side effects were generally mild and only slightly greater in the acupuncture group . CONCLUSIONS : This study did not find evidence to support the superiority of acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture in the treatment of IBS OBJECTIVES : Gut-directed hypnotherapy has been found to be effective in  irritable bowel syndrome ( IBS ) .  However , r and omized , controlled studies are rare and few have been performed outside highly specialized research centers . The objective of this study was to study the effect of gut-directed hypnotherapy in IBS in different clinical setting s outside the traditional research units . METHODS : The study population included IBS patients refractory to st and ard management . In study 1 , patients were r and omized to receive  gut-directed hypnotherapy  ( 12 sessions , 1 h/week ) in psychology private practice s or supportive therapy , whereas patients were r and omized to receive gut-directed hypnotherapy  in a small county hospital or to serve as waiting list controls in study 2 . Gastrointestinal symptom severity and quality of life were evaluated at baseline , at 3 months follow-up and after 1 year . RESULTS : We r and omized 138 IBS patients refractory to st and ard management , 90 in study 1 and 48 in study 2 . In both the studies , IBS-related symptoms were improved at 3 months in the gut-directed hypnotherapy groups ( P<0.05 ) , but not in the control groups ( ns ) . In study 1 , a significantly greater improvement of IBS-related symptom severity could be detected in the gut-directed hypnotherapy group than in the control group ( P<0.05 ) , and a trend in the same direction was seen in study 2 ( P=0.17 ) . The results seen at 3 months were sustained up to 1 year . CONCLUSIONS : Gut-directed hypnotherapy is an effective treatment alternative for patients with refractory IBS , but the effectiveness is lower when the therapy is given outside the highly specialized research centers Acupuncture is one of the most widely used and broadly research ed of the complementary and alternative therapies , but high- quality trials generally show no benefit over sham acupuncture . Many would view this result as evidence of ineffectiveness for this intervention . This discussion article focuses on the report of a large multicenter r and omized controlled trial of  acupuncture for chronic low-back pain ( CLBP ) in the lay and academic press , the ensuing discussion , and its impact on both clinical practice and service provision . The authors suggest that interpretive bias has affected reporting , leading to question able conclusions and advocacy in favor of this form of care that may exceed the evidence . They also suggest that a lack of underst and ing of research into the placebo effect may have contributed to confusion in the interpretation of these trials At a comparison among 5 therapy methods the  small psychotherapy  with a success-rate of 74 % is high-significantly more prospero us than the other examined methods . The acupuncture with 31 % long-term success is significantly superior to the  pseudoacupuncture  ( 17.2 % ) . The papaverine therapy results in a long-lasting status free of symptoms in 17.2 % of the patients and is significantly different from the results of the papaverine-placebo-therapy ( 0 % ) . Distinct differences in the success-rates of the  small psychotherapy  with different therapists prove the role of the personality and the perfection in mastering the methods with psychotherapeutic procedures . Comparable differences between the examiners were not found among the effects of a spasmolytic therapy BACKGROUND Acupuncture is widely used by patients with low back pain , although its effectiveness is unclear . We investigated the efficacy of acupuncture compared with minimal acupuncture and with no acupuncture in patients with chronic low back pain .  METHODS Patients were r and omized to treatment with acupuncture , minimal acupuncture ( superficial needling at nonacupuncture points ) , or a waiting list control . Acupuncture and minimal acupuncture were administered by specialized acupuncture physicians in 30 outpatient centers , and consisted of 12 sessions per patient over 8 weeks . Patients completed st and ardized question naires at baseline and at 8 , 26 , and 52 weeks after r and omization . The primary outcome variable was the change in low back pain intensity from baseline to the end of week 8 , as determined on a visual analog scale ( range , 0 - 100 mm ) . RESULTS A total of 298 patients ( 67.8 % female ; mean + /- SD age , 59 + /- 9 years ) were included . Between baseline and week 8 , pain intensity decreased by a mean + /- SD of 28.7 + /- 30.3 mm in the acupuncture group , 23.6 + /- 31.0 mm in the minimal acupuncture group , and 6.9 + /- 22.0 mm in the waiting list group . The difference for the acupuncture vs minimal acupuncture group was 5.1 mm ( 95 % confidence interval , -3.7 to 13.9 mm ; P = .26 ) , and the difference for the acupuncture vs waiting list group was 21.7 mm ( 95 % confidence interval , 13.9 - 30.0 mm ; P<.001 ) . Also , at 26 ( P=.96 ) and 52 ( P=.61 ) weeks , pain did not differ significantly between the acupuncture and the minimal acupuncture groups . CONCLUSION Acupuncture was more effective in improving pain than no acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic low back pain , whereas there were no significant differences between acupuncture and minimal acupuncture AIM Irritable bowel syndrome ( IBS ) is a common disorder and many patients fail to find adequate relief from conventional therapies for their symptoms . This study tests the cl aim that acupuncture is effective for a majority of these patients . METHODS A prospect i ve , blinded , sham acupuncture-controlled trial of traditional Chinese acupuncture was performed at a single postgraduate teaching hospital in Europe . Sixty patients with well-established IBS were recruited . The blinded comparator was sham acupuncture administered by the second of two acupuncturists who alone was aware of the r and omization , and who otherwise followed the prescription of the first . The primary end-point was a defined fall in the symptom score at 13 wk ( by intention to treat ) . The prior expectation was a 30 % placebo response , and a response rate of 70 % from acupuncture , for which the study was adequately powered . RESULTS Patients in treated and sham groups improved significantly during the study -mean improvement in scores being equal ( minus 1.9 ) and significant for both ( P<0.05 ; one-tailed t test ) . There was a small numeric but non-significant difference between the response rate in patients receiving acupuncture ( 40.7 % ) and sham treatment ( 31.2 % ) . Several secondary end-points marginally favored active treatment , but an improved symptom score of any degree of magnitude occurred more often with sham therapy ( 65.6 % vs 59.2 % ) . For no criterion was statistical significance approached . CONCLUSION Traditional Chinese acupuncture is relatively ineffective in IBS in the European hospital setting , and the magnitude of any effect appears insufficient to warrant investment in acupuncture services Abstract Objective To investigate whether a sham device ( a vali date d sham acupuncture needle ) has a greater placebo effect than an inert pill in patients with persistent arm pain . Design A single blind r and omised controlled trial created from the two week placebo run-in periods for two nested trials that compared acupuncture and amitriptyline with their respective placebo controls . Comparison of participants who remained on placebo continued beyond the run-in period to the end of the study . Setting Academic medical centre . Participants 270 adults with arm pain due to repetitive use that had lasted at least three months despite treatment and who scored ≥3 on a 10 point pain scale . Interventions Acupuncture with sham device twice a week for six weeks or placebo pill once a day for eight weeks . Main outcome measures Arm pain measured on a 10 point pain scale . Secondary outcomes were symptoms measured by the Levine symptom severity scale , function measured by Pransky 's upper extremity function scale , and grip strength . Results Pain decreased during the two week placebo run-in period in both the sham device and placebo pill groups , but changes were not different between the groups ( −0.14 , 95 % confidence interval −0.52 to 0.25 , P = 0.49 ) . Changes in severity scores for arm symptoms and grip strength were similar between groups , but arm function improved more in the placebo pill group ( 2 
    Output:
    
agent
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: : No currently available treatment provides consistent relief of irritable bowel syndrome . Colonic sensory and motor function are modulated partly through 5HT3‐receptors Background The approximately 1100 medical journals now active in China are publishing a rapidly increasing number of research reports , including many studies identified by their authors as r and omized controlled trials . It has been noticed that these reports mostly present positive results , and their quality and authenticity have consequently been called into question . We investigated the adequacy of r and omization  of clinical trials published in recent years in China to determine how many of them met acceptable st and ards for allocating participants to treatment groups . Methods The China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic data base was search ed for reports of r and omized controlled trials on 20 common diseases published from January 1994 to June 2005 . From this sample , a subset of trials that appeared to have used r and omization methods was selected . Twenty-one investigators trained in the relevant knowledge , communication skills and quality control issues interviewed the original authors of these trials about the participant r and omization methods and related quality -control features of their trials . Results From an initial sample of 37,313 articles identified in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure data base , we found 3137 apparent r and omized controlled trials . Of these , 1452 were studies of conventional medicine ( published in 411 journals ) and 1685 were studies of traditional Chinese medicine ( published in 352 journals ) . Interviews with the authors of 2235 of these reports revealed that only 207 studies adhered to accepted methodology for r and omization and could on those grounds be deemed authentic r and omized controlled trials ( 6.8 % , 95 % confidence interval 5.9–7.7 ) . There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of authenticity between r and omized controlled trials of traditional interventions and those of conventional interventions . R and omized controlled trials conducted at hospitals affiliated to medical universities were more likely to be authentic than trials conducted at level 3 and level 2 hospitals ( relative risk 1.58 , 95 % confidence interval 1.18–2.13 , and relative risk 14.42 , 95 % confidence interval 9.40–22.10 , respectively ) . The likelihood of authenticity was higher in level 3 hospitals than in level 2 hospitals ( relative risk 9.32 , 95 % confidence interval 5.83–14.89 ) . All r and omized controlled trials of pre-market drug clinical trial were authentic by our criteria . Of the trials conducted at university-affiliated hospitals , 56.3 % were authentic ( 95 % confidence interval 32.0–81.0 ) . Conclusion Most reports of r and omized controlled trials published in some Chinese journals lacked an adequate description of r and omization . Similarly , most so called ' r and omized controlled trials ' were not real r and omized controlled trials owing toa lack of adequate underst and ing on the part of the authors of rigorous clinical trial design . All r and omized controlled trials of pre-market drug clinical trial included in this research were authentic . R and omized controlled trials conducted by authors in high level hospitals , especially in hospitals affiliated to medical universities had a higher rate of authenticity . That so many non-r and omized controlled trials were published as r and omized controlled trials reflected the fact that peer review needs to be improved and a good practice guide for peer review including how to identify the authenticity of the study urgently needs to be developed OBJECTIVES : This study aim ed to compare the effects of true and sham acupuncture in relieving symptoms of  irritable bowel syndrome ( IBS ) .  METHODS : A total of 230 adult IBS patients ( 75 % females , average age : 38.4 years ) were r and omly assigned to 3 weeks of true or sham acupuncture ( 6 treatments ) after a 3-week “ run-in ” with sham acupuncture in an “ augmented ” or “ limited ” patient – practitioner interaction . A third arm of the study included a waitlist control group . The primary outcome was the IBS Global Improvement Scale ( IBS-GIS ) ( range : 1–7 ) ; secondary outcomes included the IBS Symptom Severity Scale ( IBS-SSS ) , the IBS Adequate Relief ( IBS-AR ) , and the IBS Quality of Life ( IBS-QOL ) . RESULTS : Although there was no statistically significant difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture on the IBS-GIS ( 41 vs. 32 % , P=0.25 ) , both groups improved significantly compared with the waitlist control group ( 37 vs. 4 % , P=0.001 ) . Similarly , small differences that were not statistically significant favored acupuncture over the other three outcomes : IBS-AR ( 59 vs. 57 % , P=0.83 ) , IBS-SSS ( 31 vs. 21 % , P=0.18 ) , and IBS-QOL ( 17 vs. 13 % , P=0.56 ) . Eliminating responders during the run-in period did not substantively change the results . Side effects were generally mild and only slightly greater in the acupuncture group . CONCLUSIONS : This study did not find evidence to support the superiority of acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture in the treatment of IBS OBJECTIVES : Gut-directed hypnotherapy has been found to be effective in  irritable bowel syndrome ( IBS ) .  However , r and omized , controlled studies are rare and few have been performed outside highly specialized research centers . The objective of this study was to study the effect of gut-directed hypnotherapy in IBS in different clinical setting s outside the traditional research units . METHODS : The study population included IBS patients refractory to st and ard management . In study 1 , patients were r and omized to receive  gut-directed hypnotherapy  ( 12 sessions , 1 h/week ) in psychology private practice s or supportive therapy , whereas patients were r and omized to receive gut-directed hypnotherapy  in a small county hospital or to serve as waiting list controls in study 2 . Gastrointestinal symptom severity and quality of life were evaluated at baseline , at 3 months follow-up and after 1 year . RESULTS : We r and omized 138 IBS patients refractory to st and ard management , 90 in study 1 and 48 in study 2 . In both the studies , IBS-related symptoms were improved at 3 months in the gut-directed hypnotherapy groups ( P<0.05 ) , but not in the control groups ( ns ) . In study 1 , a significantly greater improvement of IBS-related symptom severity could be detected in the gut-directed hypnotherapy group than in the control group ( P<0.05 ) , and a trend in the same direction was seen in study 2 ( P=0.17 ) . The results seen at 3 months were sustained up to 1 year . CONCLUSIONS : Gut-directed hypnotherapy is an effective treatment alternative for patients with refractory IBS , but the effectiveness is lower when the therapy is given outside the highly specialized research centers Acupuncture is one of the most widely used and broadly research ed of the complementary and alternative therapies , but high- quality trials generally show no benefit over sham acupuncture . Many would view this result as evidence of ineffectiveness for this intervention . This discussion article focuses on the report of a large multicenter r and omized controlled trial of  acupuncture for chronic low-back pain ( CLBP ) in the lay and academic press , the ensuing discussion , and its impact on both clinical practice and service provision . The authors suggest that interpretive bias has affected reporting , leading to question able conclusions and advocacy in favor of this form of care that may exceed the evidence . They also suggest that a lack of underst and ing of research into the placebo effect may have contributed to confusion in the interpretation of these trials At a comparison among 5 therapy methods the  small psychotherapy  with a success-rate of 74 % is high-significantly more prospero us than the other examined methods . The acupuncture with 31 % long-term success is significantly superior to the  pseudoacupuncture  ( 17.2 % ) . The papaverine therapy results in a long-lasting status free of symptoms in 17.2 % of the patients and is significantly different from the results of the papaverine-placebo-therapy ( 0 % ) . Distinct differences in the success-rates of the  small psychotherapy  with different therapists prove the role of the personality and the perfection in mastering the methods with psychotherapeutic procedures . Comparable differences between the examiners were not found among the effects of a spasmolytic therapy BACKGROUND Acupuncture is widely used by patients with low back pain , although its effectiveness is unclear . We investigated the efficacy of acupuncture compared with minimal acupuncture and with no acupuncture in patients with chronic low back pain .  METHODS Patients were r and omized to treatment with acupuncture , minimal acupuncture ( superficial needling at nonacupuncture points ) , or a waiting list control . Acupuncture and minimal acupuncture were administered by specialized acupuncture physicians in 30 outpatient centers , and consisted of 12 sessions per patient over 8 weeks . Patients completed st and ardized question naires at baseline and at 8 , 26 , and 52 weeks after r and omization . The primary outcome variable was the change in low back pain intensity from baseline to the end of week 8 , as determined on a visual analog scale ( range , 0 - 100 mm ) . RESULTS A total of 298 patients ( 67.8 % female ; mean + /- SD age , 59 + /- 9 years ) were included . Between baseline and week 8 , pain intensity decreased by a mean + /- SD of 28.7 + /- 30.3 mm in the acupuncture group , 23.6 + /- 31.0 mm in the minimal acupuncture group , and 6.9 + /- 22.0 mm in the waiting list group . The difference for the acupuncture vs minimal acupuncture group was 5.1 mm ( 95 % confidence interval , -3.7 to 13.9 mm ; P = .26 ) , and the difference for the acupuncture vs waiting list group was 21.7 mm ( 95 % confidence interval , 13.9 - 30.0 mm ; P<.001 ) . Also , at 26 ( P=.96 ) and 52 ( P=.61 ) weeks , pain did not differ significantly between the acupuncture and the minimal acupuncture groups . CONCLUSION Acupuncture was more effective in improving pain than no acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic low back pain , whereas there were no significant differences between acupuncture and minimal acupuncture AIM Irritable bowel syndrome ( IBS ) is a common disorder and many patients fail to find adequate relief from conventional therapies for their symptoms . This study tests the cl aim that acupuncture is effective for a majority of these patients . METHODS A prospect i ve , blinded , sham acupuncture-controlled trial of traditional Chinese acupuncture was performed at a single postgraduate teaching hospital in Europe . Sixty patients with well-established IBS were recruited . The blinded comparator was sham acupuncture administered by the second of two acupuncturists who alone was aware of the r and omization , and who otherwise followed the prescription of the first . The primary end-point was a defined fall in the symptom score at 13 wk ( by intention to treat ) . The prior expectation was a 30 % placebo response , and a response rate of 70 % from acupuncture , for which the study was adequately powered . RESULTS Patients in treated and sham groups improved significantly during the study -mean improvement in scores being equal ( minus 1.9 ) and significant for both ( P<0.05 ; one-tailed t test ) . There was a small numeric but non-significant difference between the response rate in patients receiving acupuncture ( 40.7 % ) and sham treatment ( 31.2 % ) . Several secondary end-points marginally favored active treatment , but an improved symptom score of any degree of magnitude occurred more often with sham therapy ( 65.6 % vs 59.2 % ) . For no criterion was statistical significance approached . CONCLUSION Traditional Chinese acupuncture is relatively ineffective in IBS in the European hospital setting , and the magnitude of any effect appears insufficient to warrant investment in acupuncture services Abstract Objective To investigate whether a sham device ( a vali date d sham acupuncture needle ) has a greater placebo effect than an inert pill in patients with persistent arm pain . Design A single blind r and omised controlled trial created from the two week placebo run-in periods for two nested trials that compared acupuncture and amitriptyline with their respective placebo controls . Comparison of participants who remained on placebo continued beyond the run-in period to the end of the study . Setting Academic medical centre . Participants 270 adults with arm pain due to repetitive use that had lasted at least three months despite treatment and who scored ≥3 on a 10 point pain scale . Interventions Acupuncture with sham device twice a week for six weeks or placebo pill once a day for eight weeks . Main outcome measures Arm pain measured on a 10 point pain scale . Secondary outcomes were symptoms measured by the Levine symptom severity scale , function measured by Pransky 's upper extremity function scale , and grip strength . Results Pain decreased during the two week placebo run-in period in both the sham device and placebo pill groups , but changes were not different between the groups ( −0.14 , 95 % confidence interval −0.52 to 0.25 , P = 0.49 ) . Changes in severity scores for arm symptoms and grip strength were similar between groups , but arm function improved more in the placebo pill group ( 2 
    Output:
    