human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: The efficacy of tricyclics and benzodiazepines in the short term ( approximately 2 - 4 months ) treatment of panic disorder is well demonstrated , but efficacy over the longer term is not considered established . The present study provided systematic data from a double blind comparison of maintenance therapy ( up to 8 months ) of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia with alprazolam , imipramine , or placebo in 181 patients who had responded to the same regimen in a r and omized 8-week treatment trial . All three groups had improved during the first 2 months ( active treatments more than placebo and about equal to each other ) , and all maintained or extended their improvement over the next 6 months without any significant change in dose . More than twice as many alprazolam and imipramine than placebo patients ( 15 % ) remained in treatment for the full 8 months and did slightly better on symptom measures than the remaining placebo patients . Both medications were well tolerated during the maintenance period . The data suggest sustained efficacy and safety of imipramine and alprazolam over an extended period . More specifically , they suggest that tolerance does not develop to the therapeutic effects of either drug CONTEXT Previous studies indicate that industry-sponsored trials tend to draw proindustry conclusions . OBJECTIVE To explore whether the association between funding and conclusions in r and omized drug trials reflects treatment effects or adverse events . DESIGN Observational study of 370 r and omized drug trials included in meta-analyses from Cochrane review s selected from the Cochrane Library , May 2001 . From a r and om sample of 167 Cochrane review s , 25 contained eligible meta-analyses ( assessed a binary outcome ; pooled at least 5 full-paper trials of which at least 1 reported adequate and 1 reported inadequate allocation concealment ) . The primary binary outcome from each meta- analysis was considered the primary outcome for all trials included in each meta- analysis . The association between funding and conclusions was analyzed by logistic regression with adjustment for treatment effect , adverse events , and additional confounding factors ( method ological quality , control intervention , sample size , publication year , and place of publication ) . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Conclusions in trials , classified into whether the experimental drug was recommended as the treatment of choice or not . RESULTS The experimental drug was recommended as treatment of choice in 16 % of trials funded by nonprofit organizations , 30 % of trials not reporting funding , 35 % of trials funded by both nonprofit and for-profit organizations , and 51 % of trials funded by for-profit organizations ( P<.001 ; chi2 test ) . Logistic regression analyses indicated that funding , treatment effect , and double blinding were the only significant predictors of conclusions . Adjusted analyses showed that trials funded by for-profit organizations were significantly more likely to recommend the experimental drug as treatment of choice ( odds ratio , 5.3 ; 95 % confidence interval , 2.0 - 14.4 ) compared with trials funded by nonprofit organizations . This association did not appear to reflect treatment effect or adverse events . CONCLUSIONS Conclusions in trials funded by for-profit organizations may be more positive due to biased interpretation of trial results . Readers should carefully evaluate whether conclusions in r and omized trials are supported by data Seventy-nine patients with panic disorder were r and omized to an 8-week double-blind treatment with alprazolam , imipramine , or placebo . Patients kept daily records of panic attacks , activity , anxiety , sleep , and medication use . Weekly measures of anxiety , depression , somatic symptoms , fears , avoidance , disability , and improvement were obtained . All patients underwent a symptom-limited exercise treadmill and other cardiovascular measures . By physician and patient global assessment , patients receiving alprazolam or imipramine were significantly better than patients on placebo . The alprazolam effects were apparent by week 1 ; the imipramine effects by week 4 . All groups showed significant reductions in anxiety , depression , somatic measures , and panic attack frequency . At 8 weeks , patients in the alprazolam group reported significantly less fear than patients in the other two groups . Subjects in the imipramine group showed a significant increase in heart rate and blood pressure BACKGROUND The serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors are increasingly being used for the treatment of panic disorder . We examined the efficacy and safety of the serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor sertraline hydrochloride in patients with panic disorder . METHODS One hundred seventy-six nondepressed out patients with panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , from 10 sites followed identical protocol s that used a flexible-dose design . After 2 weeks of single-blind placebo , patients were r and omly assigned to 10 weeks of double-blind , flexible-dose treatment with either sertraline hydrochloride ( 50 - 200 mg/d ) or placebo . RESULTS Sertraline-treated patients exhibited significantly greater improvement ( P=.01 ) at end point than did patients treated with placebo for the primary outcome variable , panic attack frequency . Significant differences between groups were also evident for clinician and patient assessment s of improvement as measured by the Clinical Global Impression Improvement ( P=.01 ) and Severity ( P=.009 ) Scales , Panic Disorder Severity Scale ratings ( P=.03 ) , high end-state function assessment ( P=.03 ) , Patient Global Evaluation rating ( P=.01 ) , and quality of life scores ( P=.003 ) . Adverse events , generally characterized as either mild or moderate , were not significantly different in overall incidence between the sertraline and placebo groups . CONCLUSION Results support the safety and efficacy of sertraline for the short-term treatment of patients with panic disorder ABSTRACT A double‐blind clinical trial of zimeldine , a potent inhibitor of central serotonin reuptake , versus imipramine and placebo was carried out on 44 patients suffering from agoraphobia with panic attacks .  Zimeldine was a superior treatment on all rating scales other than a global rating scale which did not reach statistically significant superiority . Imipramine was not shown to be superior to placebo . The implication s of these results for further research on the underlying pathophysiology of agoraphobia with panic attacks are discussed Several reports suggest that selective serotonin reuptake blockers are helpful in the treatment of panic disorder . The aim of the study was to compare fluvoxamine with placebo in 50 panic disorder patients by using an 8-week , double-blind , parallel-groups design . Weekly assessment included a panic attack diary ( frequency and severity ) , the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale , the Clinical Anxiety Scale , and the Sheehan Disability Scale . Although both groups improved on all measures , the fluvoxamine group experienced significantly less frequent major panic attacks from the third week on and significantly lower ratings on anxiety , depression , and disability from the sixth week on . Mean ratings of the severity of major and the severity and frequency of minor attacks were not affected differently by fluvoxamine and placebo . At the end of the study , significantly more patients on fluvoxamine were free of major and minor panic attacks . The results indicate that : ( 1 ) the administration of fluvoxamine , as compared with placebo , led to a significant reduction in the number of panic attacks . ( 2 ) The severity of panic attacks was not affected by fluvoxamine . ( 3 ) The effect of fluvoxamine on anxiety , depressive mood , and disability differed from placebo only after 6 weeks of treatment , after which the placebo group showed either no further improvement or a reversal of symptoms . ( 4 ) Participation in a drug study , even without additional psychotherapy , led to significant improvement in all patients BACKGROUND Escitalopram , the therapeutically active isomer of the racemic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant citalopram , has shown significant anxiolytic effects in placebo-controlled clinical trials of social anxiety disorder , generalized anxiety disorder , and anxiety symptoms associated with major depression . This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of escitalopram in out patients diagnosed with panic disorder . METHOD Male and female out patients between 18 and 80 years of age meeting DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , were r and omly assigned to 10 weeks of double-blind treatment with escitalopram , citalopram , or placebo in a study conducted from September 1999 to July 2001 . The primary measure of efficacy was panic attack frequency at week 10 relative to baseline , as assessed by the Modified Sheehan Panic and Anticipatory Anxiety Scale . RESULTS A total of 366 subjects ( 128 escitalopram patients , 119 citalopram patients , and 119 placebo patients ) received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment . The frequency of panic attacks was statistically significantly improved ( p = .04 ) , and the increase in percentage of patients with zero panic attacks reached borderline significance ( p = .051 ) , in the escitalopram-treated group relative to the placebo-treated group . Both escitalopram and citalopram statistically significantly reduced panic disorder symptoms and severity versus placebo at endpoint ( p < /=.05 ) , as measured by the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale total score , the Clinical Global Impressions scale , the Patient Global Evaluation , and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Question naire . Treatment with escitalopram was safe and well tolerated , with a similar incidence of the most common adverse events for the escitalopram and placebo groups . The rate of discontinuation for adverse events was 6.3 % for escitalopram , 8.4 % for citalopram , and 7.6 % for placebo . CONCLUSION Escitalopram is efficacious , safe , and well tolerated in the treatment of panic disorder The efficacy of buspirone for panic disorder was tested in 60 patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( 3rd ed . ) criteria for panic disorder or agoraphobia with panic attacks . Patients were r and omly assigned to treatment with buspirone ( mean dose 29.5 mg/day ) , imipramine ( mean dose 140 mg/day ) , or placebo , and treated for 8 weeks after a 4- to 7-day placebo lead-in period . Patients with 4 or fewer attacks per month and those without attacks at the baseline visit were excluded from panic frequency comparisons . Both buspirone and imipramine tended to be better than placebo on total number of panic attacks , global psychopathology , and the Hamilton Anxiety rating scale , but end point differences among treatments were not statistically significant . At the end of the study , 25 % of the buspirone patients were panic-free , as were 7 % of the imipramine patients and 14 % of the placebo patients ; again , these differences were not statistically significant . The results of this study were inconclusive , partly because of the relatively small number of patients ( 10 - 11 ) completing the study in each treatment group , and partly because of a robust placebo response in this population . Possible reasons for this high placebo response are discussed , as well as suggestions for changes in study design for future studies This paper presents findings from a multisite study of 126 subjects meeting DSM-III-R criteria for Panic Disorder who also met criteria for a concurrent Major Depressive Episode , Dysthymia , or Depressive Disorder NOS . The study 's primary aim was to discern the influence of varying degrees of depression on the comparative efficacy of alprazolam , imipramine and placebo on anxiety outcomes . A placebo-controlled , double-blind , parallel r and om assignment design was utilized over a total of 16 weeks . There was no medication effect on panic outcomes . At endpoint , percent of anticipatory anxiety ( i.e. , time spent worrying about having an anxiety attack ) was significantly lower in the patients taking active medications vs. placebo .  Phobic measures were significantly improved by alprazolam , vs. both imipramine and placebo early in the study ; however , by week 8 both active medications were equally superior to placebo in the reduction of phobic symptoms . In addition , both active medications were significantly more effective than placebo in reducing depression . The same efficacy pattern ( i.e. , active medications superior to placebo ) was observed on measures of general functioning . Importantly , there were no significant interactions observed between medication and presence of major depression on the depression measures , indicating that both alprazolam and imipramine were equally efficacious in treating the depression in patients with panic disorder and major depression . Since the patients enrolled in this study suffered from major depressive disorder in the mild to moderate severity range , these results may not be transferrable to patients with panic disorder and severe major depression Among 79 volunteer , unpaid , family doctor-referred psychiatric out patients with DSM III-R panic disorder , with and without agoraphobia , 66 completed a six week placebo-controlled trial of lofepramine versus clomipramine and 57 survivors were followed up for 6 months . All subjects received one hour per week concurrent behavioural counselling in the acute phase . Of 13 dropouts in the first 3 weeks , 9 ( of 27 ) were on clomipramine , 2 ( of 26 ) were on lofepramine and 2 ( of 26 ) were on placebo . The high ( 30 % ) early dropout from the clomipramine group was largely due to medication intolerance . Both drugs were superior to placebo by the end of week 6 on several st and ard rating scales but not on panic attack frequency 
    Output:
    
agent
We observed the same finding when classes of antidepressants were compared with placebo .
When looking at dropouts due to adverse effects , which can be considered as a measure of tolerability , we found moderate- quality evidence showing that antidepressants as a whole are less well tolerated than placebo .
The identified studies comprehensively address the objectives of the present review .Based on these results , antidepressants may be more effective than placebo in treating panic disorder .
Antidepressants may also have benefit in comparison with placebo in terms of number of dropouts , but a less favourable profile in terms of dropout due to adverse effects .
However , the tolerability profile varied between different classes of antidepressants .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: The efficacy of tricyclics and benzodiazepines in the short term ( approximately 2 - 4 months ) treatment of panic disorder is well demonstrated , but efficacy over the longer term is not considered established . The present study provided systematic data from a double blind comparison of maintenance therapy ( up to 8 months ) of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia with alprazolam , imipramine , or placebo in 181 patients who had responded to the same regimen in a r and omized 8-week treatment trial . All three groups had improved during the first 2 months ( active treatments more than placebo and about equal to each other ) , and all maintained or extended their improvement over the next 6 months without any significant change in dose . More than twice as many alprazolam and imipramine than placebo patients ( 15 % ) remained in treatment for the full 8 months and did slightly better on symptom measures than the remaining placebo patients . Both medications were well tolerated during the maintenance period . The data suggest sustained efficacy and safety of imipramine and alprazolam over an extended period . More specifically , they suggest that tolerance does not develop to the therapeutic effects of either drug CONTEXT Previous studies indicate that industry-sponsored trials tend to draw proindustry conclusions . OBJECTIVE To explore whether the association between funding and conclusions in r and omized drug trials reflects treatment effects or adverse events . DESIGN Observational study of 370 r and omized drug trials included in meta-analyses from Cochrane review s selected from the Cochrane Library , May 2001 . From a r and om sample of 167 Cochrane review s , 25 contained eligible meta-analyses ( assessed a binary outcome ; pooled at least 5 full-paper trials of which at least 1 reported adequate and 1 reported inadequate allocation concealment ) . The primary binary outcome from each meta- analysis was considered the primary outcome for all trials included in each meta- analysis . The association between funding and conclusions was analyzed by logistic regression with adjustment for treatment effect , adverse events , and additional confounding factors ( method ological quality , control intervention , sample size , publication year , and place of publication ) . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Conclusions in trials , classified into whether the experimental drug was recommended as the treatment of choice or not . RESULTS The experimental drug was recommended as treatment of choice in 16 % of trials funded by nonprofit organizations , 30 % of trials not reporting funding , 35 % of trials funded by both nonprofit and for-profit organizations , and 51 % of trials funded by for-profit organizations ( P<.001 ; chi2 test ) . Logistic regression analyses indicated that funding , treatment effect , and double blinding were the only significant predictors of conclusions . Adjusted analyses showed that trials funded by for-profit organizations were significantly more likely to recommend the experimental drug as treatment of choice ( odds ratio , 5.3 ; 95 % confidence interval , 2.0 - 14.4 ) compared with trials funded by nonprofit organizations . This association did not appear to reflect treatment effect or adverse events . CONCLUSIONS Conclusions in trials funded by for-profit organizations may be more positive due to biased interpretation of trial results . Readers should carefully evaluate whether conclusions in r and omized trials are supported by data Seventy-nine patients with panic disorder were r and omized to an 8-week double-blind treatment with alprazolam , imipramine , or placebo . Patients kept daily records of panic attacks , activity , anxiety , sleep , and medication use . Weekly measures of anxiety , depression , somatic symptoms , fears , avoidance , disability , and improvement were obtained . All patients underwent a symptom-limited exercise treadmill and other cardiovascular measures . By physician and patient global assessment , patients receiving alprazolam or imipramine were significantly better than patients on placebo . The alprazolam effects were apparent by week 1 ; the imipramine effects by week 4 . All groups showed significant reductions in anxiety , depression , somatic measures , and panic attack frequency . At 8 weeks , patients in the alprazolam group reported significantly less fear than patients in the other two groups . Subjects in the imipramine group showed a significant increase in heart rate and blood pressure BACKGROUND The serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors are increasingly being used for the treatment of panic disorder . We examined the efficacy and safety of the serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor sertraline hydrochloride in patients with panic disorder . METHODS One hundred seventy-six nondepressed out patients with panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , from 10 sites followed identical protocol s that used a flexible-dose design . After 2 weeks of single-blind placebo , patients were r and omly assigned to 10 weeks of double-blind , flexible-dose treatment with either sertraline hydrochloride ( 50 - 200 mg/d ) or placebo . RESULTS Sertraline-treated patients exhibited significantly greater improvement ( P=.01 ) at end point than did patients treated with placebo for the primary outcome variable , panic attack frequency . Significant differences between groups were also evident for clinician and patient assessment s of improvement as measured by the Clinical Global Impression Improvement ( P=.01 ) and Severity ( P=.009 ) Scales , Panic Disorder Severity Scale ratings ( P=.03 ) , high end-state function assessment ( P=.03 ) , Patient Global Evaluation rating ( P=.01 ) , and quality of life scores ( P=.003 ) . Adverse events , generally characterized as either mild or moderate , were not significantly different in overall incidence between the sertraline and placebo groups . CONCLUSION Results support the safety and efficacy of sertraline for the short-term treatment of patients with panic disorder ABSTRACT A double‐blind clinical trial of zimeldine , a potent inhibitor of central serotonin reuptake , versus imipramine and placebo was carried out on 44 patients suffering from agoraphobia with panic attacks .  Zimeldine was a superior treatment on all rating scales other than a global rating scale which did not reach statistically significant superiority . Imipramine was not shown to be superior to placebo . The implication s of these results for further research on the underlying pathophysiology of agoraphobia with panic attacks are discussed Several reports suggest that selective serotonin reuptake blockers are helpful in the treatment of panic disorder . The aim of the study was to compare fluvoxamine with placebo in 50 panic disorder patients by using an 8-week , double-blind , parallel-groups design . Weekly assessment included a panic attack diary ( frequency and severity ) , the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale , the Clinical Anxiety Scale , and the Sheehan Disability Scale . Although both groups improved on all measures , the fluvoxamine group experienced significantly less frequent major panic attacks from the third week on and significantly lower ratings on anxiety , depression , and disability from the sixth week on . Mean ratings of the severity of major and the severity and frequency of minor attacks were not affected differently by fluvoxamine and placebo . At the end of the study , significantly more patients on fluvoxamine were free of major and minor panic attacks . The results indicate that : ( 1 ) the administration of fluvoxamine , as compared with placebo , led to a significant reduction in the number of panic attacks . ( 2 ) The severity of panic attacks was not affected by fluvoxamine . ( 3 ) The effect of fluvoxamine on anxiety , depressive mood , and disability differed from placebo only after 6 weeks of treatment , after which the placebo group showed either no further improvement or a reversal of symptoms . ( 4 ) Participation in a drug study , even without additional psychotherapy , led to significant improvement in all patients BACKGROUND Escitalopram , the therapeutically active isomer of the racemic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant citalopram , has shown significant anxiolytic effects in placebo-controlled clinical trials of social anxiety disorder , generalized anxiety disorder , and anxiety symptoms associated with major depression . This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of escitalopram in out patients diagnosed with panic disorder . METHOD Male and female out patients between 18 and 80 years of age meeting DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , were r and omly assigned to 10 weeks of double-blind treatment with escitalopram , citalopram , or placebo in a study conducted from September 1999 to July 2001 . The primary measure of efficacy was panic attack frequency at week 10 relative to baseline , as assessed by the Modified Sheehan Panic and Anticipatory Anxiety Scale . RESULTS A total of 366 subjects ( 128 escitalopram patients , 119 citalopram patients , and 119 placebo patients ) received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment . The frequency of panic attacks was statistically significantly improved ( p = .04 ) , and the increase in percentage of patients with zero panic attacks reached borderline significance ( p = .051 ) , in the escitalopram-treated group relative to the placebo-treated group . Both escitalopram and citalopram statistically significantly reduced panic disorder symptoms and severity versus placebo at endpoint ( p < /=.05 ) , as measured by the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale total score , the Clinical Global Impressions scale , the Patient Global Evaluation , and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Question naire . Treatment with escitalopram was safe and well tolerated , with a similar incidence of the most common adverse events for the escitalopram and placebo groups . The rate of discontinuation for adverse events was 6.3 % for escitalopram , 8.4 % for citalopram , and 7.6 % for placebo . CONCLUSION Escitalopram is efficacious , safe , and well tolerated in the treatment of panic disorder The efficacy of buspirone for panic disorder was tested in 60 patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( 3rd ed . ) criteria for panic disorder or agoraphobia with panic attacks . Patients were r and omly assigned to treatment with buspirone ( mean dose 29.5 mg/day ) , imipramine ( mean dose 140 mg/day ) , or placebo , and treated for 8 weeks after a 4- to 7-day placebo lead-in period . Patients with 4 or fewer attacks per month and those without attacks at the baseline visit were excluded from panic frequency comparisons . Both buspirone and imipramine tended to be better than placebo on total number of panic attacks , global psychopathology , and the Hamilton Anxiety rating scale , but end point differences among treatments were not statistically significant . At the end of the study , 25 % of the buspirone patients were panic-free , as were 7 % of the imipramine patients and 14 % of the placebo patients ; again , these differences were not statistically significant . The results of this study were inconclusive , partly because of the relatively small number of patients ( 10 - 11 ) completing the study in each treatment group , and partly because of a robust placebo response in this population . Possible reasons for this high placebo response are discussed , as well as suggestions for changes in study design for future studies This paper presents findings from a multisite study of 126 subjects meeting DSM-III-R criteria for Panic Disorder who also met criteria for a concurrent Major Depressive Episode , Dysthymia , or Depressive Disorder NOS . The study 's primary aim was to discern the influence of varying degrees of depression on the comparative efficacy of alprazolam , imipramine and placebo on anxiety outcomes . A placebo-controlled , double-blind , parallel r and om assignment design was utilized over a total of 16 weeks . There was no medication effect on panic outcomes . At endpoint , percent of anticipatory anxiety ( i.e. , time spent worrying about having an anxiety attack ) was significantly lower in the patients taking active medications vs. placebo .  Phobic measures were significantly improved by alprazolam , vs. both imipramine and placebo early in the study ; however , by week 8 both active medications were equally superior to placebo in the reduction of phobic symptoms . In addition , both active medications were significantly more effective than placebo in reducing depression . The same efficacy pattern ( i.e. , active medications superior to placebo ) was observed on measures of general functioning . Importantly , there were no significant interactions observed between medication and presence of major depression on the depression measures , indicating that both alprazolam and imipramine were equally efficacious in treating the depression in patients with panic disorder and major depression . Since the patients enrolled in this study suffered from major depressive disorder in the mild to moderate severity range , these results may not be transferrable to patients with panic disorder and severe major depression Among 79 volunteer , unpaid , family doctor-referred psychiatric out patients with DSM III-R panic disorder , with and without agoraphobia , 66 completed a six week placebo-controlled trial of lofepramine versus clomipramine and 57 survivors were followed up for 6 months . All subjects received one hour per week concurrent behavioural counselling in the acute phase . Of 13 dropouts in the first 3 weeks , 9 ( of 27 ) were on clomipramine , 2 ( of 26 ) were on lofepramine and 2 ( of 26 ) were on placebo . The high ( 30 % ) early dropout from the clomipramine group was largely due to medication intolerance . Both drugs were superior to placebo by the end of week 6 on several st and ard rating scales but not on panic attack frequency 
    Output:
    