human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of an evidence -based , systematic approach to hypertension care involving comanagement of patients by primary care physicians and clinical pharmacists versus usual care in reducing blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension . METHODS Patients in a staff model medical group with uncontrolled hypertension were r and omized to either a usual care ( UC ) or a physician-pharmacist comanagement ( PPCM ) group . All physicians in the study received both group and individual education and participated in the development of an evidence -based hypertension treatment algorithm . Physicians were then given the names of their patients whose medical records documented elevated blood pressures ( defined as systolic > or = 140 mm Hg and /or diastolic > or = 90 mm Hg for patients aged < 65 yrs , and systolic > or = 160 mm Hg and /or diastolic > or = 90 mm Hg for those aged > or = 65 yrs ) . Patients r and omized to the UC group were managed by primary care physicians alone . Those r and omized to the PPCM group were comanaged by their primary care physician and a clinical pharmacist , who provided patient education , made treatment recommendations , and provided follow-up .  Blood pressure measurements , antihypertensive drugs , and visit costs/patient were obtained from medical records . RESULTS One hundred ninety-seven patients with uncontrolled hypertension participated in the study . Both PPCM and UC groups experienced significant reductions in blood pressure ( systolic -22 and -11 mm Hg , respectively , p < 0.01 ; diastolic -7 and -8 mm Hg , respectively , p < 0.01 ) . The reduction in systolic blood pressure was greater in the PPCM group after adjusting for differences in baseline blood pressure between the groups ( p < 0.01 ) . More patients achieved blood pressure control in the PPCM than in the UC group ( 60 % vs 43 % , p = 0.02 ) . Average provider visit costs/patient were higher in the UC than the PPCM group ( $ 195 vs $ 160 , p = 0.02 ) . CONCLUSIONS An evidence -based , systematic approach using physician-pharmacist comanagement for patients with uncontrolled hypertension result ed in improved blood pressure control and reduced average visit costs/patient OBJECTIVES To identify patients at risk for coronary artery disease ( CAD ) through a search of a community pharmacy 's prescription data base , to screen and identify patients with elevated cholesterol and at risk for CAD , to enroll patients in a pharmacist-directed lipid management program , and to evaluate selected clinical and humanistic outcomes . DESIGN R and omized , pretest-posttest control groups . SETTING Independent community pharmacy in a suburban metropolitan area . PATIENTS 51 patients who were not at National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) or defined triglyceride goals and who met inclusion criteria . INTERVENTION Pharmacist-directed lipid management program . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical outcome measures included total cholesterol , LDL-C , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( HDL-C ) , and triglyceride levels ; achievement of LDL-C goal ; and risk factor prediction scores . Humanistic outcome measures included patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care and patient knowledge of hyperlipidemia . RESULTS LDL-C was decreased in the pharmacist intervention group ( n = 25 ) , compared with an increase in the control group at study end . HDL-C levels increased and triglyceride levels decreased in both groups . Of treatment group patients , 32 % achieved their cholesterol goals , compared with 15 % of control group patients . Risk factor prediction scores improved in the treatment group and worsened in the control group . The treatment group 's hyperlipidemia knowledge scores improved significantly from pretest to posttest . Both treatment and control group patient satisfaction scores for the pharmacist investigator were favorable at study end . CONCLUSION Both treatment and control patients benefited from participating in this study . Patients enrolled in the lipid management program made greater improvements in their knowledge of hyperlipidemia , risk factor scores , and cholesterol levels The Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists , a r and omized , controlled trial in over 50 community pharmacies in Alberta and Saskatchewan , Canada , demonstrated that a pharmacist intervention program improved cholesterol risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease . In a sub study , costs and consequences were analyzed to describe the economic impact of the program . Two perspectives were taken : a government-funded health care system and a pharmacy manager . Costs were reported in 1999 Canadian dollars . Incremental costs to a government payor and community pharmacy manager were $ 6.40/patient and $ 21.76/patient , respectively , during the 4-month follow-up period . The community pharmacy manager had an initial investment of $ 683.50 . The change in Framingham risk function for the intervention group from baseline also was reported . The 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease decreased from 17.3 % to 16.4 % ( p<0.0001 ) during the 4 months . The intervention program in this study led to a significant reduction in cardiovascular risk in the intervention group during the 4-month follow-up period . The incremental cost to provide the program appeared minimal from both government and pharmacy manager perspectives . It is hoped that these results could support negotiations for reimbursement of clinical pharmacy services with payors Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess whether the VA-MEDIC ( Veterans Affairs Multi-disciplinary Education and Diabetes Intervention for Cardiac risk reduction ) , a pharmacist-led group medical visit program , could improve achievement of target goals in hypertension , hyperglycemia , hyperlipidemia , and tobacco use in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to usual care . Methods This was a r and omized controlled trial of VA-MEDIC intervention in addition to usual care versus usual care alone in diabetic patients to reduce cardiac risk factors . VA-MEDIC consisted of a 40- to 60-minute educational component by nurse , nutritionist , physical therapist , or pharmacist followed by pharmacist-led behavioral and pharmacological interventions over 4 weekly sessions . Measures The attainment of target goals in hemoglobin A1C ( A1C ) , blood pressure , fasting lipids , and tobacco use recommended by the American Diabetes Association . Results Of 118 participants , 109 completed the study . VA-MEDIC ( n = 58 ) participants were younger and had greater tobacco use at baseline than usual care but were similar in other cardiovascular risk factors . After 4 months , a greater proportion of VA-MEDIC participants versus controls achieved an A1C of less than 7 % and a systolic blood pressure less than 130 mm Hg . No significant change was found in lipid control or tobacco use between the 2 study arms . Conclusion Pharmacist-led group medical visits are feasible and efficacious for improving cardiac risk factors AIMS To determine whether an extended pharmacy service would improve glycaemic control and cardiovascular risks in diabetic Muslims . METHODS Ambulatory literate adult diabetic Muslims with A1C > 7 % were r and omly assigned to either a study group ( usual care plus added pharmacist input , N=63 ) or a  control group ( usual care only , N=67 ) . On four consecutive visits , at 2-month intervals , the study group met a pharmacist who educated and discussed with each patient regarding medication uses and diabetic treatment . This was accompanied by providing a diabetic pamphlet .  Changes in A1C ( mg/dL ) , lipid parameters ( mg/dL ) , medication adherence ( % pill count ) and diabetic knowledge scores were measured . RESULTS There was no difference in A1C reduction between the study and the control groups ( -0.8 vs. -0.6 , p=0.56 ) . Total cholesterol and LDL-C improvements were greater in the study group than in the control group ( -31.6 vs. -1.2 , p=0.000 ; -15.0 vs. + 9.1 , p=0.002 , respectively ) . The percent pill count ( + 6.8 vs. -2.8 , p=0.004 ) and diabetic knowledge scores ( + 2.1 vs. + 0.6 , p=0.002 ) were increased in the study group but not in the control group . CONCLUSION The pharmacist ' s one-on-one education on diabetes accompanied by its pamphlet , in Muslim patients with diabetes did not affect glycaemic outcome but reduction in cardiovascular risks through lowering total cholesterol and LDL-C was found . The strategies may also improve diabetic knowledge and medication adherence CONTEXT Poor medication adherence diminishes the health benefits of pharmacotherapies . Elderly patients with coronary risk factors frequently require treatment with multiple medications , placing them at increased risk for nonadherence . OBJECTIVE To test the efficacy of a comprehensive pharmacy care program to improve medication adherence and its associated effects on blood pressure ( BP ) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PATIENTS A multiphase , prospect i ve study with an observational phase and a r and omized controlled trial conducted at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center of 200 community-based patients aged 65 years or older taking at least 4 chronic medications . The study was conducted from June 2004 to August 2006 . INTERVENTION After a 2-month run-in phase ( measurement of baseline adherence , BP , and LDL-C ) , patients entered a 6-month intervention phase ( st and ardized medication education , regular follow-up by pharmacists , and medications dispensed in time-specific packs ) . Following the intervention phase , patients were r and omized to continued pharmacy care vs usual care for an additional 6 months . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary end point of the observation phase was change in the proportion of pills taken vs baseline ; secondary end points were the associated changes in BP and LDL-C. Primary end point of the r and omization phase was the between-group comparison of medication persistence . RESULTS A total of 200 elderly patients ( 77.1 % men ; mean [ SD ] age , 78 [ 8.3 ] years ) , taking a mean ( SD ) of 9 ( 3 ) chronic medications were enrolled . Coronary risk factors included drug-treated hypertension in 184 patients ( 91.5 % ) and drug-treated hyperlipidemia in 162 ( 80.6 % ) . Mean ( SD ) baseline medication adherence was 61.2 % ( 13.5 % ) . After 6 months of intervention , medication adherence increased to 96.9 % ( 5.2 % ; P<.001 ) and was associated with significant improvements in systolic BP ( 133.2 [ 14.9 ] to 129.9 [ 16.0 ] mm Hg ; P = .02 ) and LDL-C ( 91.7 [ 26.1 ] to 86.8 [ 23.4 ] mg/dL ; P = .001 ) . Six months after r and omization , the persistence of medication adherence decreased to 69.1 % ( 16.4 % ) among those patients assigned to usual care , whereas it was sustained at 95.5 % ( 7.7 % ) in pharmacy care ( P<.001 ) . This was associated with significant reductions in systolic BP in the pharmacy care group ( -6.9 mm Hg ; 95 % CI , -10.7 to -3.1 mm Hg ) vs the usual care group ( -1.0 mm Hg ; 95 % CI , -5.9 to 3.9 mm Hg ; P = .04 ) , but no significant between-group differences in LDL-C levels or reductions . CONCLUSIONS A pharmacy care program led to increases in medication adherence , medication persistence , and clinical ly meaningful reductions in BP , whereas discontinuation of the program was associated with decreased medication adherence and persistence . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : BACKGROUND Noncompliance is a major factor in the morbidity and unnecessary hospital readmissions for patients with heart failure . Several studies have aim ed to reduce rehospitalizations in heart failure patients through a comprehensive , multidisciplinary approach . Medication compliance was rarely measured in these studies or , when it was measured , the method employed was seldom valid . We aim ed at determining the effect of a pharmacist-led intervention on medication compliance in patients with heart failure . METHODS We conducted a r and omized controlled trial into the effect of a pharmacist-led intervention on medication compliance in patients with heart failure ( predominantly New York Heart Association [ NYHA ] II and III ) treated with loop diuretics , presenting to a cardiology outpatient clinic or admitted to hospitals in The Netherl and s. Patients in the intervention group received monthly consultations from their community pharmacist during a 6-month period . Patients in the control group received usual care . Primary endpoint was medication compliance , assessed with a medication event monitoring system , an electronic pill bottle that registers time of opening . Secondary endpoints were the number of rehospitalizations , death , and quality of life . RESULTS A total of 152 patients were r and omized : 74 patients to the intervention arm and 78 patients to the usual care arm . Over the 6-month study period , patients in the intervention group had 140/ 
    Output:
    
agent
68 % of the outcomes reported showed that clinical pharmacy services were associated with better improvement in patients ' outcomes compared with the control group .
The involvement of a pharmacist demonstrated an ability to improve CVD outcomes through providing educational intervention , medicine management intervention , or a combination of both .
These interventions result ed in improved CVD risk factors , improved patient outcomes , and reduced number of drug-related problems with a direct effect on CVD control .
These improvements may lead to an improvement in patient quality of life , better use of health care re sources , and a reduced rate of mortality
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of an evidence -based , systematic approach to hypertension care involving comanagement of patients by primary care physicians and clinical pharmacists versus usual care in reducing blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension . METHODS Patients in a staff model medical group with uncontrolled hypertension were r and omized to either a usual care ( UC ) or a physician-pharmacist comanagement ( PPCM ) group . All physicians in the study received both group and individual education and participated in the development of an evidence -based hypertension treatment algorithm . Physicians were then given the names of their patients whose medical records documented elevated blood pressures ( defined as systolic > or = 140 mm Hg and /or diastolic > or = 90 mm Hg for patients aged < 65 yrs , and systolic > or = 160 mm Hg and /or diastolic > or = 90 mm Hg for those aged > or = 65 yrs ) . Patients r and omized to the UC group were managed by primary care physicians alone . Those r and omized to the PPCM group were comanaged by their primary care physician and a clinical pharmacist , who provided patient education , made treatment recommendations , and provided follow-up .  Blood pressure measurements , antihypertensive drugs , and visit costs/patient were obtained from medical records . RESULTS One hundred ninety-seven patients with uncontrolled hypertension participated in the study . Both PPCM and UC groups experienced significant reductions in blood pressure ( systolic -22 and -11 mm Hg , respectively , p < 0.01 ; diastolic -7 and -8 mm Hg , respectively , p < 0.01 ) . The reduction in systolic blood pressure was greater in the PPCM group after adjusting for differences in baseline blood pressure between the groups ( p < 0.01 ) . More patients achieved blood pressure control in the PPCM than in the UC group ( 60 % vs 43 % , p = 0.02 ) . Average provider visit costs/patient were higher in the UC than the PPCM group ( $ 195 vs $ 160 , p = 0.02 ) . CONCLUSIONS An evidence -based , systematic approach using physician-pharmacist comanagement for patients with uncontrolled hypertension result ed in improved blood pressure control and reduced average visit costs/patient OBJECTIVES To identify patients at risk for coronary artery disease ( CAD ) through a search of a community pharmacy 's prescription data base , to screen and identify patients with elevated cholesterol and at risk for CAD , to enroll patients in a pharmacist-directed lipid management program , and to evaluate selected clinical and humanistic outcomes . DESIGN R and omized , pretest-posttest control groups . SETTING Independent community pharmacy in a suburban metropolitan area . PATIENTS 51 patients who were not at National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) or defined triglyceride goals and who met inclusion criteria . INTERVENTION Pharmacist-directed lipid management program . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical outcome measures included total cholesterol , LDL-C , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( HDL-C ) , and triglyceride levels ; achievement of LDL-C goal ; and risk factor prediction scores . Humanistic outcome measures included patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care and patient knowledge of hyperlipidemia . RESULTS LDL-C was decreased in the pharmacist intervention group ( n = 25 ) , compared with an increase in the control group at study end . HDL-C levels increased and triglyceride levels decreased in both groups . Of treatment group patients , 32 % achieved their cholesterol goals , compared with 15 % of control group patients . Risk factor prediction scores improved in the treatment group and worsened in the control group . The treatment group 's hyperlipidemia knowledge scores improved significantly from pretest to posttest . Both treatment and control group patient satisfaction scores for the pharmacist investigator were favorable at study end . CONCLUSION Both treatment and control patients benefited from participating in this study . Patients enrolled in the lipid management program made greater improvements in their knowledge of hyperlipidemia , risk factor scores , and cholesterol levels The Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists , a r and omized , controlled trial in over 50 community pharmacies in Alberta and Saskatchewan , Canada , demonstrated that a pharmacist intervention program improved cholesterol risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease . In a sub study , costs and consequences were analyzed to describe the economic impact of the program . Two perspectives were taken : a government-funded health care system and a pharmacy manager . Costs were reported in 1999 Canadian dollars . Incremental costs to a government payor and community pharmacy manager were $ 6.40/patient and $ 21.76/patient , respectively , during the 4-month follow-up period . The community pharmacy manager had an initial investment of $ 683.50 . The change in Framingham risk function for the intervention group from baseline also was reported . The 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease decreased from 17.3 % to 16.4 % ( p<0.0001 ) during the 4 months . The intervention program in this study led to a significant reduction in cardiovascular risk in the intervention group during the 4-month follow-up period . The incremental cost to provide the program appeared minimal from both government and pharmacy manager perspectives . It is hoped that these results could support negotiations for reimbursement of clinical pharmacy services with payors Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess whether the VA-MEDIC ( Veterans Affairs Multi-disciplinary Education and Diabetes Intervention for Cardiac risk reduction ) , a pharmacist-led group medical visit program , could improve achievement of target goals in hypertension , hyperglycemia , hyperlipidemia , and tobacco use in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to usual care . Methods This was a r and omized controlled trial of VA-MEDIC intervention in addition to usual care versus usual care alone in diabetic patients to reduce cardiac risk factors . VA-MEDIC consisted of a 40- to 60-minute educational component by nurse , nutritionist , physical therapist , or pharmacist followed by pharmacist-led behavioral and pharmacological interventions over 4 weekly sessions . Measures The attainment of target goals in hemoglobin A1C ( A1C ) , blood pressure , fasting lipids , and tobacco use recommended by the American Diabetes Association . Results Of 118 participants , 109 completed the study . VA-MEDIC ( n = 58 ) participants were younger and had greater tobacco use at baseline than usual care but were similar in other cardiovascular risk factors . After 4 months , a greater proportion of VA-MEDIC participants versus controls achieved an A1C of less than 7 % and a systolic blood pressure less than 130 mm Hg . No significant change was found in lipid control or tobacco use between the 2 study arms . Conclusion Pharmacist-led group medical visits are feasible and efficacious for improving cardiac risk factors AIMS To determine whether an extended pharmacy service would improve glycaemic control and cardiovascular risks in diabetic Muslims . METHODS Ambulatory literate adult diabetic Muslims with A1C > 7 % were r and omly assigned to either a study group ( usual care plus added pharmacist input , N=63 ) or a  control group ( usual care only , N=67 ) . On four consecutive visits , at 2-month intervals , the study group met a pharmacist who educated and discussed with each patient regarding medication uses and diabetic treatment . This was accompanied by providing a diabetic pamphlet .  Changes in A1C ( mg/dL ) , lipid parameters ( mg/dL ) , medication adherence ( % pill count ) and diabetic knowledge scores were measured . RESULTS There was no difference in A1C reduction between the study and the control groups ( -0.8 vs. -0.6 , p=0.56 ) . Total cholesterol and LDL-C improvements were greater in the study group than in the control group ( -31.6 vs. -1.2 , p=0.000 ; -15.0 vs. + 9.1 , p=0.002 , respectively ) . The percent pill count ( + 6.8 vs. -2.8 , p=0.004 ) and diabetic knowledge scores ( + 2.1 vs. + 0.6 , p=0.002 ) were increased in the study group but not in the control group . CONCLUSION The pharmacist ' s one-on-one education on diabetes accompanied by its pamphlet , in Muslim patients with diabetes did not affect glycaemic outcome but reduction in cardiovascular risks through lowering total cholesterol and LDL-C was found . The strategies may also improve diabetic knowledge and medication adherence CONTEXT Poor medication adherence diminishes the health benefits of pharmacotherapies . Elderly patients with coronary risk factors frequently require treatment with multiple medications , placing them at increased risk for nonadherence . OBJECTIVE To test the efficacy of a comprehensive pharmacy care program to improve medication adherence and its associated effects on blood pressure ( BP ) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PATIENTS A multiphase , prospect i ve study with an observational phase and a r and omized controlled trial conducted at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center of 200 community-based patients aged 65 years or older taking at least 4 chronic medications . The study was conducted from June 2004 to August 2006 . INTERVENTION After a 2-month run-in phase ( measurement of baseline adherence , BP , and LDL-C ) , patients entered a 6-month intervention phase ( st and ardized medication education , regular follow-up by pharmacists , and medications dispensed in time-specific packs ) . Following the intervention phase , patients were r and omized to continued pharmacy care vs usual care for an additional 6 months . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary end point of the observation phase was change in the proportion of pills taken vs baseline ; secondary end points were the associated changes in BP and LDL-C. Primary end point of the r and omization phase was the between-group comparison of medication persistence . RESULTS A total of 200 elderly patients ( 77.1 % men ; mean [ SD ] age , 78 [ 8.3 ] years ) , taking a mean ( SD ) of 9 ( 3 ) chronic medications were enrolled . Coronary risk factors included drug-treated hypertension in 184 patients ( 91.5 % ) and drug-treated hyperlipidemia in 162 ( 80.6 % ) . Mean ( SD ) baseline medication adherence was 61.2 % ( 13.5 % ) . After 6 months of intervention , medication adherence increased to 96.9 % ( 5.2 % ; P<.001 ) and was associated with significant improvements in systolic BP ( 133.2 [ 14.9 ] to 129.9 [ 16.0 ] mm Hg ; P = .02 ) and LDL-C ( 91.7 [ 26.1 ] to 86.8 [ 23.4 ] mg/dL ; P = .001 ) . Six months after r and omization , the persistence of medication adherence decreased to 69.1 % ( 16.4 % ) among those patients assigned to usual care , whereas it was sustained at 95.5 % ( 7.7 % ) in pharmacy care ( P<.001 ) . This was associated with significant reductions in systolic BP in the pharmacy care group ( -6.9 mm Hg ; 95 % CI , -10.7 to -3.1 mm Hg ) vs the usual care group ( -1.0 mm Hg ; 95 % CI , -5.9 to 3.9 mm Hg ; P = .04 ) , but no significant between-group differences in LDL-C levels or reductions . CONCLUSIONS A pharmacy care program led to increases in medication adherence , medication persistence , and clinical ly meaningful reductions in BP , whereas discontinuation of the program was associated with decreased medication adherence and persistence . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : BACKGROUND Noncompliance is a major factor in the morbidity and unnecessary hospital readmissions for patients with heart failure . Several studies have aim ed to reduce rehospitalizations in heart failure patients through a comprehensive , multidisciplinary approach . Medication compliance was rarely measured in these studies or , when it was measured , the method employed was seldom valid . We aim ed at determining the effect of a pharmacist-led intervention on medication compliance in patients with heart failure . METHODS We conducted a r and omized controlled trial into the effect of a pharmacist-led intervention on medication compliance in patients with heart failure ( predominantly New York Heart Association [ NYHA ] II and III ) treated with loop diuretics , presenting to a cardiology outpatient clinic or admitted to hospitals in The Netherl and s. Patients in the intervention group received monthly consultations from their community pharmacist during a 6-month period . Patients in the control group received usual care . Primary endpoint was medication compliance , assessed with a medication event monitoring system , an electronic pill bottle that registers time of opening . Secondary endpoints were the number of rehospitalizations , death , and quality of life . RESULTS A total of 152 patients were r and omized : 74 patients to the intervention arm and 78 patients to the usual care arm . Over the 6-month study period , patients in the intervention group had 140/ 
    Output:
    