human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To develop a checklist of items measuring the quality of reports of r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) assessing nonpharmacological treatments ( NPTs ) . STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING The Delphi consensus method was used to select and reduce the number of items in the checklist . A total of 154 individuals were invited to participate : epidemiologists and statisticians involved in the field of methodology of RCTs ( n = 55 ) , members of the Cochrane Collaboration ( n = 41 ) , and clinicians involved in planning NPT clinical trials ( n = 58 ) . Participants ranked on a 10-point Likert scale whether an item should be included in the checklist . RESULTS Fifty-five experts ( 36 % ) participated in the survey . They were experienced in systematic review s ( 68 % were involved in the Cochrane Collaboration ) and in planning RCTs ( 76 % ) . Three rounds of the Delphi method were conducted to achieve consensus . The final checklist contains 10 items and 5 subitems , with items related to the st and ardization of the intervention , care provider influence , and additional measures to minimize the potential bias from lack of blinding of participants , care providers , and outcome assessors . CONCLUSIONS This tool can be used to critically appraise the medical literature , design NPT studies , and assess the quality of trial reports included in systematic review Background R and omised controlled trials demonstrate a 60 % reduction in  type 2 diabetes incidence through lifestyle modification programmes . The aim of this study is to determine whether such programmes are feasible in primary health care . Methods An intervention study including 237 individuals 40–75 years of age with moderate or high risk of developing type 2 diabetes . A structured group programme with six 90 minute sessions delivered during an eight month period by trained nurses in Australian primary health care in 2004–2006 . Main outcome measures taken at baseline , three , and 12 months included weight , height , waist circumference , fasting plasma glucose and lipids , plasma glucose two hours after oral glucose challenge , blood pressure , measures of psychological distress and general health outcomes . To test differences between baseline and follow-up , paired t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed . Results At twelve months participants ' mean weight reduced by 2.52 kg ( 95 % confidence interval 1.85 to 3.19 ) and waist circumference by 4.17 cm ( 3.48 to 4.87 ) . Mean fasting glucose reduced by 0.14 mmol/l ( 0.07 to 0.20 ) , plasma glucose two hours after oral glucose challenge by 0.58 mmol/l ( 0.36 to 0.79 ) , total cholesterol by 0.29 mmol/l ( 0.18 to 0.40 ) , low density lipoprotein cholesterol by 0.25 mmol/l ( 0.16 to 0.34 ) , triglycerides by 0.15 mmol/l ( 0.05 to 0.24 ) and diastolic blood pressure by 2.14 mmHg ( 0.94 to 3.33 ) . Significant improvements were also found in most psychological measures . Conclusion This study provides evidence that a type 2 diabetes prevention programme using lifestyle intervention is feasible in primary health care setting s , with reductions in risk factors approaching those observed in clinical trials . Trial NumberCurrent Controlled Trials IS RCT Developing an evidence base for making public health decisions will require using data from evaluation studies with r and omized and nonr and omized design s. Assessing individual studies and using studies in quantitative research syntheses require transparent reporting of the study , with sufficient detail and clarity to readily see differences and similarities among studies in the same area . The Consoli date d St and ards of Reporting Trials ( CONSORT ) statement provides guidelines for transparent reporting of r and omized clinical trials . We present the initial version of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonr and omized Design s ( TREND ) statement . These guidelines emphasize the reporting of theories used and descriptions of intervention and comparison conditions , research design , and methods of adjusting for possible biases in evaluation studies that use nonr and omized design D iabetes is one of the most costly and burdensome chronic diseases of our time and is a condition that is increasing in epidemic proportions in the U.S. and throughout the world ( 1 ) . The complications result ing from the disease are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and are associated with the damage or failure of various organs such as the eyes , kidneys , and nerves . Individuals with type 2 diabetes are also at a significantly higher risk for coronary heart disease , peripheral vascular disease , and stroke , and they have a greater likelihood of having hypertension , dyslipidemia , and obesity ( 2–6 ) . There is also growing evidence that at glucose levels above normal but below the diabetes threshold diagnostic now referred to as pre-diabetes , there is a substantially increased risk of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) and death ( 5,7–10 ) . In these individuals , CVD risk factors are also more prevalent ( 5–7,9,11–14 ) , which further increases the risk but is not sufficient to totally explain it . In contrast to the clear benefit of glucose lowering to prevent or retard the progression of microvascular complications associated with diabetes ( 15– 18,21 ) , it is less clear whether the high rate of CVD in people with impaired glucose homeostasis , i.e. , those with impaired fasting glucose ( IFG ) , impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) , or diabetes , is caused by elevated blood glucose levels or will respond to treatments that lower blood glucose . Epidemiological studies have shown a clear relationship ( 19,20 ) , whereas intervention trials in people with diabetes suggest , but have not demonstrated , a clear benefit of glycemic control ( 15,16,21,22 ) . Additionally , there are no studies that have investigated a benefit of glucose lowering on macrovascular disease in subjects with only pre-diabetes ( IFG or IGT ) but not diabetes . Although the treatment of diabetes has become increasingly sophisticated , with over a dozen pharmacological agents available to lower blood glucose , a multitude of ancillary supplies and equipment available , and a clear recognition by health care professionals and patients that diabetes is a serious disease , the normalization of blood glucose for any appreciable period of time is seldom achieved ( 23 ) . In addition , in well-controlled socalled “ intensively ” treated patients , serious complications still occur ( 15–18,21 ) , and the economic and personal burden of diabetes remains . Furthermore , microvascular disease is already present in many individuals with undiagnosed or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes ( 11,24– 28 ) . Given these facts , it is not surprising that studies have been initiated in the last decade to determine the feasibility and benefit of various strategies to prevent or delay the onset of  type 2 diabetes .  Two early reports ( 29,30 ) suggested that changes in lifestyle can prevent diabetes , but weaknesses in study design limited their general relevance . Recently , however , four well- design ed r and omized controlled trials have been reported ( 31–35 ) . In the Finnish study ( 31 ) , 522 middleaged ( mean age 55 years ) obese ( mean BMI 31 kg/m ) subjects with IGT were r and omized to receive either brief diet and exercise counseling ( control group ) or intensive individualized instruction on weight reduction , food intake , and guidance on increasing physical activity ( intervention group ) . After an average follow-up of 3.2 years , there was a 58 % relative reduction in the incidence of diabetes in the intervention group compared with the control subjects . A strong correlation was also seen between the ability to stop the progression to diabetes and the degree to which subjects were able to achieve one or more of the following : lose weight ( goal of 5.0 % weight reduction ) , reduce fat intake ( goal of 30 % of calories ) , reduce saturated fat intake ( goal of 10 % of calories ) , increase fiber intake ( goal of 15 g/1,000 kcal ) , and exercise ( goal of 150 min/week ) . No untoward effects of the lifestyle interventions were observed . In the Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) ( 32–34 ) , the 3,234 enrolled subjects were slightly younger ( mean age 51 years ) and more obese ( mean BMI 34 kg/m ) but had nearly identical glucose intolerance compared with subjects in the Finnish study . About 45 % of the participants were from minority groups ( e.g , AfricanAmerican , Hispanic ) , and 20 % were 60 years of age . Subjects were r and omized to one of three intervention groups , which included the intensive nutrition and exercise counseling ( “ lifestyle ” ) group or either of two masked medication treatment groups : the biguanide metformin group or the placebo group . The latter interventions were combined with st and ard diet and exercise recommendations . After an average follow-up of 2.8 years ( range 1.8–4.6 years ) , a 58 % relative reduction in the progression to diabetes was observed in the lifestyle group ( absolute incidence 4.8 % ) , and a 31 % relative reduction in the progression of diabetes was observed in the metformin group ( absolute incidence 7.8 % ) compared with control subjects ( absolute incidence 11.0 % ) . ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● The YMCA ’s Diabetes Prevention Program gives you the skills you need and the support you deserve to make lasting healthy lifestyle changes . WHAT IS PREDIABETES ? Prediabetes occurs when blood sugar levels are higher than normal but not high enough for a type 2 diabetes diagnosis . Risk for developing type 2 diabetes may be reduced or eliminated by weight loss , healthier eating and increased physical activity Prevention of type 2 diabetes by intensive lifestyle intervention design ed to achieve and maintain ideal body weight was assessed in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) . Male subjects with IGT recruited from health-screening examinees were r and omly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to a st and ard intervention group ( control group ) and intensive intervention group ( intervention group ) . The final numbers of subjects were 356 and 102 , respectively . The subjects in the control group and in the intervention group were advised to maintain body mass index ( BMI ) of < 24.0 kg/m2 and of < 22.0 kg/m2 , respectively , by diet and exercise . In the intervention group , detailed instructions on lifestyle were repeated every 3 - 4 months during hospital visits . Diabetes was judged to have developed when two or more consecutive fasting plasma glucose ( FPG ) values exceeded 140 mg/dl . A 100 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed every 6 months to detect improvement of glucose tolerance . The subjects were seen in an ordinary outpatient clinic . The cumulative 4-year incidence of diabetes was 9.3 % in the control group , versus 3.0 % in the intervention group , and the reduction in risk of diabetes was 67.4 % ( P < 0.001 ) . Body weight decreased by 0.39 kg in the control group and by 2.18 kg in the intervention group ( P < 0.001 ) . The control group was subclassified according to increase and decrease in body weight . The incidence of diabetes was positively correlated with the changes in body weight , and the improvement in glucose tolerance was negatively correlated . Subjects with higher FPG at baseline developed diabetes at a higher rate than those with lower FPG . Higher 2h plasma glucose values and higher BMI values at baseline were also associated with a higher incidence of diabetes , but the differences were not significant . Subjects with a low insulinogenic index ( DeltaIRI/DeltaPG 30 min after an oral glucose load ) developed diabetes at a significantly higher rate than those with a normal insulinogenic index . Comparison of the BMI data and incidence of diabetes in five diabetes prevention studies by lifestyle intervention revealed a linear correlation between the incidence of diabetes and the BMI values , with the exception of the DaQing Study . However , the slope of the reduction in incidence of diabetes in the intensive intervention groups was steeper than expected simply on the basis of the reduction of BMI , suggesting that the effect of lifestyle intervention can not be solely ascribed to the body weight reduction . We conclude that lifestyle intervention aim ed at achieving ideal body weight in men with IGT  is effective and can be conducted in an outpatient clinic setting OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a new dietary education ( NDE ) program in reducing plasma glucose ( PG ) levels in Japanese male workers at high risk for type 2 diabetes through a r and omized controlled trial . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We r and omly assigned 173 high-risk men ( mean age , 55 years ) to either the NDE or the  control ( conventional dietary education )  group . Each subject in the NDE group received two individualized interventions especially aim ed at reducing total energy intake at dinner by modifying dietary intake . The control group received conventional group counseling . An 
    Output:
    
agent
A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To develop a checklist of items measuring the quality of reports of r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) assessing nonpharmacological treatments ( NPTs ) . STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING The Delphi consensus method was used to select and reduce the number of items in the checklist . A total of 154 individuals were invited to participate : epidemiologists and statisticians involved in the field of methodology of RCTs ( n = 55 ) , members of the Cochrane Collaboration ( n = 41 ) , and clinicians involved in planning NPT clinical trials ( n = 58 ) . Participants ranked on a 10-point Likert scale whether an item should be included in the checklist . RESULTS Fifty-five experts ( 36 % ) participated in the survey . They were experienced in systematic review s ( 68 % were involved in the Cochrane Collaboration ) and in planning RCTs ( 76 % ) . Three rounds of the Delphi method were conducted to achieve consensus . The final checklist contains 10 items and 5 subitems , with items related to the st and ardization of the intervention , care provider influence , and additional measures to minimize the potential bias from lack of blinding of participants , care providers , and outcome assessors . CONCLUSIONS This tool can be used to critically appraise the medical literature , design NPT studies , and assess the quality of trial reports included in systematic review Background R and omised controlled trials demonstrate a 60 % reduction in  type 2 diabetes incidence through lifestyle modification programmes . The aim of this study is to determine whether such programmes are feasible in primary health care . Methods An intervention study including 237 individuals 40–75 years of age with moderate or high risk of developing type 2 diabetes . A structured group programme with six 90 minute sessions delivered during an eight month period by trained nurses in Australian primary health care in 2004–2006 . Main outcome measures taken at baseline , three , and 12 months included weight , height , waist circumference , fasting plasma glucose and lipids , plasma glucose two hours after oral glucose challenge , blood pressure , measures of psychological distress and general health outcomes . To test differences between baseline and follow-up , paired t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed . Results At twelve months participants ' mean weight reduced by 2.52 kg ( 95 % confidence interval 1.85 to 3.19 ) and waist circumference by 4.17 cm ( 3.48 to 4.87 ) . Mean fasting glucose reduced by 0.14 mmol/l ( 0.07 to 0.20 ) , plasma glucose two hours after oral glucose challenge by 0.58 mmol/l ( 0.36 to 0.79 ) , total cholesterol by 0.29 mmol/l ( 0.18 to 0.40 ) , low density lipoprotein cholesterol by 0.25 mmol/l ( 0.16 to 0.34 ) , triglycerides by 0.15 mmol/l ( 0.05 to 0.24 ) and diastolic blood pressure by 2.14 mmHg ( 0.94 to 3.33 ) . Significant improvements were also found in most psychological measures . Conclusion This study provides evidence that a type 2 diabetes prevention programme using lifestyle intervention is feasible in primary health care setting s , with reductions in risk factors approaching those observed in clinical trials . Trial NumberCurrent Controlled Trials IS RCT Developing an evidence base for making public health decisions will require using data from evaluation studies with r and omized and nonr and omized design s. Assessing individual studies and using studies in quantitative research syntheses require transparent reporting of the study , with sufficient detail and clarity to readily see differences and similarities among studies in the same area . The Consoli date d St and ards of Reporting Trials ( CONSORT ) statement provides guidelines for transparent reporting of r and omized clinical trials . We present the initial version of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonr and omized Design s ( TREND ) statement . These guidelines emphasize the reporting of theories used and descriptions of intervention and comparison conditions , research design , and methods of adjusting for possible biases in evaluation studies that use nonr and omized design D iabetes is one of the most costly and burdensome chronic diseases of our time and is a condition that is increasing in epidemic proportions in the U.S. and throughout the world ( 1 ) . The complications result ing from the disease are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and are associated with the damage or failure of various organs such as the eyes , kidneys , and nerves . Individuals with type 2 diabetes are also at a significantly higher risk for coronary heart disease , peripheral vascular disease , and stroke , and they have a greater likelihood of having hypertension , dyslipidemia , and obesity ( 2–6 ) . There is also growing evidence that at glucose levels above normal but below the diabetes threshold diagnostic now referred to as pre-diabetes , there is a substantially increased risk of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) and death ( 5,7–10 ) . In these individuals , CVD risk factors are also more prevalent ( 5–7,9,11–14 ) , which further increases the risk but is not sufficient to totally explain it . In contrast to the clear benefit of glucose lowering to prevent or retard the progression of microvascular complications associated with diabetes ( 15– 18,21 ) , it is less clear whether the high rate of CVD in people with impaired glucose homeostasis , i.e. , those with impaired fasting glucose ( IFG ) , impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) , or diabetes , is caused by elevated blood glucose levels or will respond to treatments that lower blood glucose . Epidemiological studies have shown a clear relationship ( 19,20 ) , whereas intervention trials in people with diabetes suggest , but have not demonstrated , a clear benefit of glycemic control ( 15,16,21,22 ) . Additionally , there are no studies that have investigated a benefit of glucose lowering on macrovascular disease in subjects with only pre-diabetes ( IFG or IGT ) but not diabetes . Although the treatment of diabetes has become increasingly sophisticated , with over a dozen pharmacological agents available to lower blood glucose , a multitude of ancillary supplies and equipment available , and a clear recognition by health care professionals and patients that diabetes is a serious disease , the normalization of blood glucose for any appreciable period of time is seldom achieved ( 23 ) . In addition , in well-controlled socalled “ intensively ” treated patients , serious complications still occur ( 15–18,21 ) , and the economic and personal burden of diabetes remains . Furthermore , microvascular disease is already present in many individuals with undiagnosed or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes ( 11,24– 28 ) . Given these facts , it is not surprising that studies have been initiated in the last decade to determine the feasibility and benefit of various strategies to prevent or delay the onset of  type 2 diabetes .  Two early reports ( 29,30 ) suggested that changes in lifestyle can prevent diabetes , but weaknesses in study design limited their general relevance . Recently , however , four well- design ed r and omized controlled trials have been reported ( 31–35 ) . In the Finnish study ( 31 ) , 522 middleaged ( mean age 55 years ) obese ( mean BMI 31 kg/m ) subjects with IGT were r and omized to receive either brief diet and exercise counseling ( control group ) or intensive individualized instruction on weight reduction , food intake , and guidance on increasing physical activity ( intervention group ) . After an average follow-up of 3.2 years , there was a 58 % relative reduction in the incidence of diabetes in the intervention group compared with the control subjects . A strong correlation was also seen between the ability to stop the progression to diabetes and the degree to which subjects were able to achieve one or more of the following : lose weight ( goal of 5.0 % weight reduction ) , reduce fat intake ( goal of 30 % of calories ) , reduce saturated fat intake ( goal of 10 % of calories ) , increase fiber intake ( goal of 15 g/1,000 kcal ) , and exercise ( goal of 150 min/week ) . No untoward effects of the lifestyle interventions were observed . In the Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) ( 32–34 ) , the 3,234 enrolled subjects were slightly younger ( mean age 51 years ) and more obese ( mean BMI 34 kg/m ) but had nearly identical glucose intolerance compared with subjects in the Finnish study . About 45 % of the participants were from minority groups ( e.g , AfricanAmerican , Hispanic ) , and 20 % were 60 years of age . Subjects were r and omized to one of three intervention groups , which included the intensive nutrition and exercise counseling ( “ lifestyle ” ) group or either of two masked medication treatment groups : the biguanide metformin group or the placebo group . The latter interventions were combined with st and ard diet and exercise recommendations . After an average follow-up of 2.8 years ( range 1.8–4.6 years ) , a 58 % relative reduction in the progression to diabetes was observed in the lifestyle group ( absolute incidence 4.8 % ) , and a 31 % relative reduction in the progression of diabetes was observed in the metformin group ( absolute incidence 7.8 % ) compared with control subjects ( absolute incidence 11.0 % ) . ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● The YMCA ’s Diabetes Prevention Program gives you the skills you need and the support you deserve to make lasting healthy lifestyle changes . WHAT IS PREDIABETES ? Prediabetes occurs when blood sugar levels are higher than normal but not high enough for a type 2 diabetes diagnosis . Risk for developing type 2 diabetes may be reduced or eliminated by weight loss , healthier eating and increased physical activity Prevention of type 2 diabetes by intensive lifestyle intervention design ed to achieve and maintain ideal body weight was assessed in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) . Male subjects with IGT recruited from health-screening examinees were r and omly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to a st and ard intervention group ( control group ) and intensive intervention group ( intervention group ) . The final numbers of subjects were 356 and 102 , respectively . The subjects in the control group and in the intervention group were advised to maintain body mass index ( BMI ) of < 24.0 kg/m2 and of < 22.0 kg/m2 , respectively , by diet and exercise . In the intervention group , detailed instructions on lifestyle were repeated every 3 - 4 months during hospital visits . Diabetes was judged to have developed when two or more consecutive fasting plasma glucose ( FPG ) values exceeded 140 mg/dl . A 100 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed every 6 months to detect improvement of glucose tolerance . The subjects were seen in an ordinary outpatient clinic . The cumulative 4-year incidence of diabetes was 9.3 % in the control group , versus 3.0 % in the intervention group , and the reduction in risk of diabetes was 67.4 % ( P < 0.001 ) . Body weight decreased by 0.39 kg in the control group and by 2.18 kg in the intervention group ( P < 0.001 ) . The control group was subclassified according to increase and decrease in body weight . The incidence of diabetes was positively correlated with the changes in body weight , and the improvement in glucose tolerance was negatively correlated . Subjects with higher FPG at baseline developed diabetes at a higher rate than those with lower FPG . Higher 2h plasma glucose values and higher BMI values at baseline were also associated with a higher incidence of diabetes , but the differences were not significant . Subjects with a low insulinogenic index ( DeltaIRI/DeltaPG 30 min after an oral glucose load ) developed diabetes at a significantly higher rate than those with a normal insulinogenic index . Comparison of the BMI data and incidence of diabetes in five diabetes prevention studies by lifestyle intervention revealed a linear correlation between the incidence of diabetes and the BMI values , with the exception of the DaQing Study . However , the slope of the reduction in incidence of diabetes in the intensive intervention groups was steeper than expected simply on the basis of the reduction of BMI , suggesting that the effect of lifestyle intervention can not be solely ascribed to the body weight reduction . We conclude that lifestyle intervention aim ed at achieving ideal body weight in men with IGT  is effective and can be conducted in an outpatient clinic setting OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a new dietary education ( NDE ) program in reducing plasma glucose ( PG ) levels in Japanese male workers at high risk for type 2 diabetes through a r and omized controlled trial . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We r and omly assigned 173 high-risk men ( mean age , 55 years ) to either the NDE or the  control ( conventional dietary education )  group . Each subject in the NDE group received two individualized interventions especially aim ed at reducing total energy intake at dinner by modifying dietary intake . The control group received conventional group counseling . An 
    Output:
    