human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE To test whether a theory-based , literacy , and culturally tailored self-management intervention , Latinos en Control  , improves glycemic control among low-income Latinos with type 2 diabetes . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 252 patients recruited from community health centers were r and omized to the  Latinos en Control intervention or to usual care . The primarily group-based intervention consisted of 12 weekly and 8 monthly sessions and targeted knowledge , attitudes , and self-management behaviors . The primary outcome was HbA1c . Secondary outcomes included diet , physical activity , blood glucose self-monitoring , diabetes knowledge and self-efficacy , and other physiological factors ( e.g. , lipids , blood pressure , and weight ) . Measures were collected at baseline and at 4- and 12-month follow-up . Change in outcomes over time between the groups and the association between HbA1c and possible mediators were estimated using mixed-effects models and an intention-to-treat approach . RESULTS A significant difference in HbA1c change between the groups was observed at 4 months ( intervention −0.88 [ −1.15 to −0.60 ] versus control −0.35 [ −0.62 to 0.07 ] , P < 0.01 ) , although this difference decreased and lost statistical significance at 12 months ( intervention −0.46 [ −0.77 to −0.13 ] versus control −0.20 [ −0.53 to 0.13 ] , P = 0.293 ) . The intervention result ed in significant change differences in diabetes knowledge at 12 months ( P = 0.001 ) , self-efficacy ( P = 0.001 ) , blood glucose self-monitoring ( P = 0.02 ) , and diet , including dietary quality ( P = 0.01 ) , kilocalories consumed ( P < 0.001 ) , percentage of fat ( P = 0.003 ) , and percentage of saturated fat ( P = 0.04 ) . These changes were in turn significantly associated with HbA1c change at 12 months . CONCLUSIONS Literacy-sensitive , culturally tailored interventions can improve diabetes control among low-income Latinos ; however , strategies to sustain improvements are needed PURPOSE We compared a 3-month diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) program followed by a 12-month peer support intervention with a 3-month DSME program alone in terms of initial and sustained improvements in glycated hemoglobin ( HbA1c ) . Secondary outcomes were risk factors for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) , diabetes distress , and social support . METHODS We r and omized 106 community-dwelling African American adults with type 2 diabetes to a 3-month DSME program followed by 12 months of weekly group sessions and supplementary telephone support delivered by peer leaders or to a 3-month DSME program with no follow-up peer support . Assessment s were conducted at baseline , 3 , 9 , and 15 months . RESULTS No changes in HbA1c were observed at 3 months or at 15 months for either group . The peer support group either sustained improvement in key CVD risk factors or stayed the same while the control group worsened at 15 months . At 15 months , the peer-support group had significantly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels ( −15 mg/dL , P = .03 ) , systolic blood pressure ( −10 mm Hg , P = .01 ) , diastolic blood pressure ( −8.3 mm Hg , P = .001 ) , and body mass index ( −0.8 kg/m2 , P = .032 ) than the DSME-alone group . CONCLUSIONS In this population of African American adults , an initial DSME program , whether or not followed by 12 months of peer support , had no effect on glycemic control . Participants in the peer-support arm of the trial did , however , experience significant improvements in some CVD risk factors or stay approximately the same while the control group declined Objective To evaluate the effectiveness on glycaemic control of a training programme in consultation skills for paediatric diabetes teams . Design Pragmatic cluster r and omised controlled trial . Setting 26 UK secondary and tertiary care paediatric diabetes services . Participants 79 healthcare practitioners ( 13 teams ) trained in the intervention ( 359 young people with type 1 diabetes aged 4 - 15 years and their main carers ) and 13 teams allocated to the control group ( 334 children and their main carers ) . Intervention Talking Diabetes programme , which promotes shared agenda setting and guiding communication style , through flexible menu of consultation strategies to support patient led behaviour change . Main outcome measures The primary outcome was glycated haemoglobin ( HbA1c ) level one year after training . Secondary outcomes were clinical measures ( hypoglycaemic episodes , body mass index , insulin regimen ) , general and diabetes specific quality of life , self reported and proxy reported self care and enablement , perceptions of the diabetes team , self reported and carer reported importance of , and confidence in , undertaking diabetes self management measured over one year . Analysis was by intention to treat . An integrated process evaluation included audio recording a sample of 86 routine consultations to assess skills shortly after training ( intervention group ) and at one year follow-up ( intervention and control group ) . Two key domains of skill assessment were use of the guiding communication style and shared agenda setting . Results 660/693 patients ( 95.2 % ) provided blood sample s at follow-up . Training diabetes care teams had no effect on HbA1c levels ( intervention effect 0.01 , 95 % confidence interval −0.02 to 0.04 , P=0.5 ) , even after adjusting for age and sex of the participants . At follow-up , trained staff ( n=29 ) were more capable than controls ( n=29 ) in guiding ( difference in means 1.14 , P<0.001 ) and agenda setting ( difference in proportions 0.45 , 95 % confidence interval 0.22 to 0.62 ) . Although skills waned over time for the trained practitioners , the reduction was not significant for either guiding ( difference in means −0.33 , P=0.128 ) or use of agenda setting ( difference in proportions −0.20 , −0.42 to 0.05 ) . 390 patients ( 56 % ) and 441 carers ( 64 % ) completed follow-up question naires . Some aspects of diabetes specific quality of life improved in controls : reduced problems with treatment barriers ( mean difference −4.6 , 95 % confidence interval −8.5 to −0.6 , P=0.03 ) and with treatment adherence ( −3.1 , −6.3 to −0.01 , P=0.05 ) . Short term ability to cope with diabetes increased in patients in intervention clinics ( 10.4 , 0.5 to 20.4 , P=0.04 ) . Carers in the intervention arm reported greater excitement about clinic visits ( 1.9 , 1.05 to 3.43 , P=0.03 ) and improved continuity of care ( 0.2 , 0.1 to 0.3 , P=0.01 ) . Conclusions Improving glycaemic control in children attending specialist diabetes clinics may not be possible through brief , team-wide training in consultation skills . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT N61568050 OBJECTIVE The objective of this observational open label trial was to characterize changes in diabetes self-management and psychological distress associated with a mobile health ( mHealth ) interactive voice response ( IVR ) self-management support program . METHODS For 3 - 6 months , 301 patients with diabetes received weekly IVR calls assessing health status and self-care  and providing tailored pre-recorded self-management support messages . Patients could participate together with an informal caregiver who received suggestions on self-management support , and patients ' clinicians were notified automatically when patients reported significant problems . RESULTS Patients completed 84 % of weekly calls , providing 5682 patient-weeks of data . Thirty-nine percent participated with an informal caregiver . Outcome analyses adjusted for study design factors and sociodemographics indicated significant pre-post improvement in medication adherence , physical functioning , depressive symptoms , and diabetes-related distress ( all p values < 0.001 ) . Analyses of self-management problems indicated that as the intervention proceeded , there were significant improvements in patients ' IVR-reported frequency of weekly medication adherence , SMBG performance , checking feet , and frequency of abnormal self-monitored blood glucose readings ( all p values < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS We conclude that the combined program of automated telemonitoring , clinician notification , and informal caregiver involvement was associated with consistent improvements in medication adherence , diabetes self-management behaviors , physical functioning , and psychological distress . A r and omized controlled trial is needed to verify these encouraging findings Background Culturally adapted interventions are needed to reduce diabetes-related morbidity and mortality among Native Hawaiian and Pacific People . Purpose The purpose of this study is to pilot test the effectiveness of a culturally adapted diabetes self-management intervention . Methods Participants were r and omly assigned in an unbalanced design to the Partners in Care intervention ( n = 48 ) or wait list control group ( n = 34 ) . Assessment s of hemoglobin A1c , underst and ing of diabetes self-management , performance of self-care activities , and diabetes-related distress were measured at baseline and 3 months ( post intervention ) . Analysis of covariance was used to test between-group differences . The community steering committee and focus group data informed the cultural adaptation of the intervention . Results There were significant baseline adjusted differences at 3 months between the Partners in Care and wait list control group in intent-to-treat ( p < 0.001 ) and complete case analyses ( p < 0.0001 ) for A1c , underst and ing ( p < 0.0001 ) , and performing diabetes self-management ( p < 0.0001 ) . Conclusions A culturally adapted diabetes self-management intervention of short duration was an effective approach to improving glycemic control among Native Hawaiian and Pacific Isl and ers Purpose The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate a culturally tailored intervention for rural African Americans . Social Cognitive Theory provided the framework for the study . Methods Twenty-two participants were recruited and r and omly assigned to either Group or Individual diabetes self-management ( DSME ) . Group DSME included story-telling , h and s-on activities , and problem-solving exercises . Individual DSME sessions focused on goal - setting and problem-solving strategies . Sessions were offered in an accessible community center over a 10-week period . Results Outcomes included glycosylated hemoglobin ( A1C ) , self-care actions , self-efficacy level , goal attainment , and satisfaction with DSME . Participants in both Group and Individual DSME improved slightly over the 3-month period in self-care activities , A1C level , and goal attainment . Although differences were not statistically significant , trends indicate improved scores on dietary actions , foot care , goal attainment , and empowerment for those experiencing Group DSME . Conclusions The culturally tailored approach was well received by all participants . Improvements among those receiving Individual DSME may indicate that brief sessions using a culturally tailored approach could enhance self-care and glycemic control . Additional testing among more participants over a longer time period is recommended Background Self-monitoring of blood glucose among people with type 2 diabetes not treated with insulin does not appear to be effective in improving glycemic control . We investigated whether health professional review of telemetrically transmitted self-monitored glucose results in improved glycemic control in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes . Methods and Findings We performed a r and omized , parallel , investigator-blind controlled trial with central ized r and omization in family practice s in four regions of the United Kingdom among 321 people with type 2 diabetes and glycated hemoglobin ( HbA1c ) > 58 mmol/mol . The supported telemonitoring intervention involved self-measurement and transmission to a secure website of twice-weekly morning and evening glucose for review by family practice clinicians who were not blinded to allocation group . The control group received usual care , with at least annual review and more frequent review s for  people with poor glycemic or blood pressure control .  HbA1c assessed at 9 mo was the primary outcome . Intention-to-treat analyses were performed . 160 people were r and omized to the intervention group and 161 to the usual care group between June 6 , 2011 , and July 19 , 2013 .  HbA1c data at follow-up were available for 146 people in the intervention group and 139 people in the control group . The mean ( SD ) HbA1c at follow-up was 63.0 ( 15.5 ) mmol/mol in the intervention group and 67.8 ( 14.7 ) mmol/mol in the usual care group . For primary analysis , adjusted mean HbA1c was 5.60 mmol/mol / 0.51 % lower ( 95 % CI 2.38 to 8.81 mmol/mol/ 95 % CI 0.22 % to 0.81 % , p = 0·0007 ) . For secondary analyses , adjusted 
    Output:
    
agent
Overall , family support had a positive impact on healthy diet , increased perceived support , higher self-efficacy , improved psychological well-being and better glycemic control .
This systematic review found evidence that DSME with family support improved self-management behaviors and health outcomes among uncontrolled glycaemia T2D patients .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE To test whether a theory-based , literacy , and culturally tailored self-management intervention , Latinos en Control  , improves glycemic control among low-income Latinos with type 2 diabetes . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 252 patients recruited from community health centers were r and omized to the  Latinos en Control intervention or to usual care . The primarily group-based intervention consisted of 12 weekly and 8 monthly sessions and targeted knowledge , attitudes , and self-management behaviors . The primary outcome was HbA1c . Secondary outcomes included diet , physical activity , blood glucose self-monitoring , diabetes knowledge and self-efficacy , and other physiological factors ( e.g. , lipids , blood pressure , and weight ) . Measures were collected at baseline and at 4- and 12-month follow-up . Change in outcomes over time between the groups and the association between HbA1c and possible mediators were estimated using mixed-effects models and an intention-to-treat approach . RESULTS A significant difference in HbA1c change between the groups was observed at 4 months ( intervention −0.88 [ −1.15 to −0.60 ] versus control −0.35 [ −0.62 to 0.07 ] , P < 0.01 ) , although this difference decreased and lost statistical significance at 12 months ( intervention −0.46 [ −0.77 to −0.13 ] versus control −0.20 [ −0.53 to 0.13 ] , P = 0.293 ) . The intervention result ed in significant change differences in diabetes knowledge at 12 months ( P = 0.001 ) , self-efficacy ( P = 0.001 ) , blood glucose self-monitoring ( P = 0.02 ) , and diet , including dietary quality ( P = 0.01 ) , kilocalories consumed ( P < 0.001 ) , percentage of fat ( P = 0.003 ) , and percentage of saturated fat ( P = 0.04 ) . These changes were in turn significantly associated with HbA1c change at 12 months . CONCLUSIONS Literacy-sensitive , culturally tailored interventions can improve diabetes control among low-income Latinos ; however , strategies to sustain improvements are needed PURPOSE We compared a 3-month diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) program followed by a 12-month peer support intervention with a 3-month DSME program alone in terms of initial and sustained improvements in glycated hemoglobin ( HbA1c ) . Secondary outcomes were risk factors for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) , diabetes distress , and social support . METHODS We r and omized 106 community-dwelling African American adults with type 2 diabetes to a 3-month DSME program followed by 12 months of weekly group sessions and supplementary telephone support delivered by peer leaders or to a 3-month DSME program with no follow-up peer support . Assessment s were conducted at baseline , 3 , 9 , and 15 months . RESULTS No changes in HbA1c were observed at 3 months or at 15 months for either group . The peer support group either sustained improvement in key CVD risk factors or stayed the same while the control group worsened at 15 months . At 15 months , the peer-support group had significantly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels ( −15 mg/dL , P = .03 ) , systolic blood pressure ( −10 mm Hg , P = .01 ) , diastolic blood pressure ( −8.3 mm Hg , P = .001 ) , and body mass index ( −0.8 kg/m2 , P = .032 ) than the DSME-alone group . CONCLUSIONS In this population of African American adults , an initial DSME program , whether or not followed by 12 months of peer support , had no effect on glycemic control . Participants in the peer-support arm of the trial did , however , experience significant improvements in some CVD risk factors or stay approximately the same while the control group declined Objective To evaluate the effectiveness on glycaemic control of a training programme in consultation skills for paediatric diabetes teams . Design Pragmatic cluster r and omised controlled trial . Setting 26 UK secondary and tertiary care paediatric diabetes services . Participants 79 healthcare practitioners ( 13 teams ) trained in the intervention ( 359 young people with type 1 diabetes aged 4 - 15 years and their main carers ) and 13 teams allocated to the control group ( 334 children and their main carers ) . Intervention Talking Diabetes programme , which promotes shared agenda setting and guiding communication style , through flexible menu of consultation strategies to support patient led behaviour change . Main outcome measures The primary outcome was glycated haemoglobin ( HbA1c ) level one year after training . Secondary outcomes were clinical measures ( hypoglycaemic episodes , body mass index , insulin regimen ) , general and diabetes specific quality of life , self reported and proxy reported self care and enablement , perceptions of the diabetes team , self reported and carer reported importance of , and confidence in , undertaking diabetes self management measured over one year . Analysis was by intention to treat . An integrated process evaluation included audio recording a sample of 86 routine consultations to assess skills shortly after training ( intervention group ) and at one year follow-up ( intervention and control group ) . Two key domains of skill assessment were use of the guiding communication style and shared agenda setting . Results 660/693 patients ( 95.2 % ) provided blood sample s at follow-up . Training diabetes care teams had no effect on HbA1c levels ( intervention effect 0.01 , 95 % confidence interval −0.02 to 0.04 , P=0.5 ) , even after adjusting for age and sex of the participants . At follow-up , trained staff ( n=29 ) were more capable than controls ( n=29 ) in guiding ( difference in means 1.14 , P<0.001 ) and agenda setting ( difference in proportions 0.45 , 95 % confidence interval 0.22 to 0.62 ) . Although skills waned over time for the trained practitioners , the reduction was not significant for either guiding ( difference in means −0.33 , P=0.128 ) or use of agenda setting ( difference in proportions −0.20 , −0.42 to 0.05 ) . 390 patients ( 56 % ) and 441 carers ( 64 % ) completed follow-up question naires . Some aspects of diabetes specific quality of life improved in controls : reduced problems with treatment barriers ( mean difference −4.6 , 95 % confidence interval −8.5 to −0.6 , P=0.03 ) and with treatment adherence ( −3.1 , −6.3 to −0.01 , P=0.05 ) . Short term ability to cope with diabetes increased in patients in intervention clinics ( 10.4 , 0.5 to 20.4 , P=0.04 ) . Carers in the intervention arm reported greater excitement about clinic visits ( 1.9 , 1.05 to 3.43 , P=0.03 ) and improved continuity of care ( 0.2 , 0.1 to 0.3 , P=0.01 ) . Conclusions Improving glycaemic control in children attending specialist diabetes clinics may not be possible through brief , team-wide training in consultation skills . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT N61568050 OBJECTIVE The objective of this observational open label trial was to characterize changes in diabetes self-management and psychological distress associated with a mobile health ( mHealth ) interactive voice response ( IVR ) self-management support program . METHODS For 3 - 6 months , 301 patients with diabetes received weekly IVR calls assessing health status and self-care  and providing tailored pre-recorded self-management support messages . Patients could participate together with an informal caregiver who received suggestions on self-management support , and patients ' clinicians were notified automatically when patients reported significant problems . RESULTS Patients completed 84 % of weekly calls , providing 5682 patient-weeks of data . Thirty-nine percent participated with an informal caregiver . Outcome analyses adjusted for study design factors and sociodemographics indicated significant pre-post improvement in medication adherence , physical functioning , depressive symptoms , and diabetes-related distress ( all p values < 0.001 ) . Analyses of self-management problems indicated that as the intervention proceeded , there were significant improvements in patients ' IVR-reported frequency of weekly medication adherence , SMBG performance , checking feet , and frequency of abnormal self-monitored blood glucose readings ( all p values < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS We conclude that the combined program of automated telemonitoring , clinician notification , and informal caregiver involvement was associated with consistent improvements in medication adherence , diabetes self-management behaviors , physical functioning , and psychological distress . A r and omized controlled trial is needed to verify these encouraging findings Background Culturally adapted interventions are needed to reduce diabetes-related morbidity and mortality among Native Hawaiian and Pacific People . Purpose The purpose of this study is to pilot test the effectiveness of a culturally adapted diabetes self-management intervention . Methods Participants were r and omly assigned in an unbalanced design to the Partners in Care intervention ( n = 48 ) or wait list control group ( n = 34 ) . Assessment s of hemoglobin A1c , underst and ing of diabetes self-management , performance of self-care activities , and diabetes-related distress were measured at baseline and 3 months ( post intervention ) . Analysis of covariance was used to test between-group differences . The community steering committee and focus group data informed the cultural adaptation of the intervention . Results There were significant baseline adjusted differences at 3 months between the Partners in Care and wait list control group in intent-to-treat ( p < 0.001 ) and complete case analyses ( p < 0.0001 ) for A1c , underst and ing ( p < 0.0001 ) , and performing diabetes self-management ( p < 0.0001 ) . Conclusions A culturally adapted diabetes self-management intervention of short duration was an effective approach to improving glycemic control among Native Hawaiian and Pacific Isl and ers Purpose The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate a culturally tailored intervention for rural African Americans . Social Cognitive Theory provided the framework for the study . Methods Twenty-two participants were recruited and r and omly assigned to either Group or Individual diabetes self-management ( DSME ) . Group DSME included story-telling , h and s-on activities , and problem-solving exercises . Individual DSME sessions focused on goal - setting and problem-solving strategies . Sessions were offered in an accessible community center over a 10-week period . Results Outcomes included glycosylated hemoglobin ( A1C ) , self-care actions , self-efficacy level , goal attainment , and satisfaction with DSME . Participants in both Group and Individual DSME improved slightly over the 3-month period in self-care activities , A1C level , and goal attainment . Although differences were not statistically significant , trends indicate improved scores on dietary actions , foot care , goal attainment , and empowerment for those experiencing Group DSME . Conclusions The culturally tailored approach was well received by all participants . Improvements among those receiving Individual DSME may indicate that brief sessions using a culturally tailored approach could enhance self-care and glycemic control . Additional testing among more participants over a longer time period is recommended Background Self-monitoring of blood glucose among people with type 2 diabetes not treated with insulin does not appear to be effective in improving glycemic control . We investigated whether health professional review of telemetrically transmitted self-monitored glucose results in improved glycemic control in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes . Methods and Findings We performed a r and omized , parallel , investigator-blind controlled trial with central ized r and omization in family practice s in four regions of the United Kingdom among 321 people with type 2 diabetes and glycated hemoglobin ( HbA1c ) > 58 mmol/mol . The supported telemonitoring intervention involved self-measurement and transmission to a secure website of twice-weekly morning and evening glucose for review by family practice clinicians who were not blinded to allocation group . The control group received usual care , with at least annual review and more frequent review s for  people with poor glycemic or blood pressure control .  HbA1c assessed at 9 mo was the primary outcome . Intention-to-treat analyses were performed . 160 people were r and omized to the intervention group and 161 to the usual care group between June 6 , 2011 , and July 19 , 2013 .  HbA1c data at follow-up were available for 146 people in the intervention group and 139 people in the control group . The mean ( SD ) HbA1c at follow-up was 63.0 ( 15.5 ) mmol/mol in the intervention group and 67.8 ( 14.7 ) mmol/mol in the usual care group . For primary analysis , adjusted mean HbA1c was 5.60 mmol/mol / 0.51 % lower ( 95 % CI 2.38 to 8.81 mmol/mol/ 95 % CI 0.22 % to 0.81 % , p = 0·0007 ) . For secondary analyses , adjusted 
    Output:
    