human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background and Purpose — The Acute C and esartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survivors ( ACCESS ) study was design ed to assess the safety of modest blood pressure reduction by c and esartan cilexetil in the early treatment of stroke . The study was also design ed to provide an estimate of the number of cases required to perform a larger phase III efficacy study . Methods — Five hundred patients were recruited in a prospect i ve , double-blind , placebo-controlled , r and omized , multicenter phase II study . Results — This safety trial was stopped prematurely when 342 patients ( 339 valid ) had been r and omized because of an imbalance in end points .  Demographic data , cardiovascular risk factors , and blood pressure on admission , on study onset , and within the whole study period were not significantly different between the 2 groups . However , the cumulative 12-month mortality and the number of vascular events differed significantly in favor of the c and esartan cilexetil group ( odds ratio , 0.475 ; 95 % CI , 0.252 to 0.895 ) . There were no significant differences in concomitant medication and in number or type of side effects . Conclusions — Although the mechanisms by which angiotensin type 1 ( AT1 ) receptor blockade affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are still unresolved , the present study shows that early neurohumoral inhibition has similar beneficial effects in cerebral and in myocardial ischemia . The fact that no cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event occurred as a result of hypotension is of significant clinical importance . When there is need for or no contraindication against early antihypertensive therapy , c and esartan cilexetil is a safe therapeutic option according to the ACCESS results BACKGROUND Calcium antagonists are a first-line treatment for hypertension . The effectiveness of diltiazem , a non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist , in reducing cardiovascular morbidity or mortality is unclear . We compared the effects of diltiazem with that of diuretics , beta-blockers , or both on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality  in hypertensive patients . METHODS In a prospect i ve , r and omised , open , blinded endpoint study , we enrolled 10,881 patients , aged 50 - 74 years , at health centres in Norway and Sweden , who had diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more . We r and omly assigned patients diltiazem , or diuretics , beta-blockers , or both . The combined primary endpoint was fatal and non-fatal stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , and other cardiovascular death . Analysis was done by intention to treat . FINDINGS Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lowered effectively in the diltiazem and diuretic and beta-blocker groups ( reduction 20.3/18.7 vs 23.3/18.7 mm Hg ; difference in systolic reduction p<0.001 ) . A primary endpoint occurred in 403 patients in the diltiazem group and in 400 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group ( 16.6 vs 16.2 events per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 1.00 [ 95 % CI 0.87 - 1.15 ] , p=0.97 ) . Fatal and non-fatal stroke occurred in 159 patients in the diltiazem group and in 196 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group ( 6.4 vs 7.9 events per 1000 patient-years ; 0.80 [ 0.65 - 0.99 ] , p=0.04 ) and fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion in 183 and 157 patients ( 7.4 vs 6.3 events per 1000 patient-years ; 1.16 [ 0.94 - 1.44 ] , p=0.17 ) . INTERPRETATION Diltiazem was as effective as treatment based on diuretics , beta-blockers , or both in preventing the combined primary endpoint of all stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , and other cardiovascular death BACKGROUND Blood pressure is a determinant of the risk of stroke among both hypertensive and non-hypertensive individuals with cerebrovascular disease . However , there is uncertainty about the efficacy and safety of blood-pressure-lowering treatments for many such patients . The perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study ( PROGRESS ) was design ed to determine the effects of a blood-pressure-lowering regimen in hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack . METHODS 6105 individuals from 172 centres in Asia , Australasia , and Europe were r and omly assigned active treatment ( n=3051 ) or placebo ( n=3054 ) . Active treatment comprised a flexible regimen based on the angiotensin- converting-enzyme inhibitor perindopril ( 4 mg daily ) , with the addition of the diuretic indapamide at the discretion of treating physicians . The primary outcome was total stroke ( fatal or non-fatal ) . Analysis was by intention to treat . FINDINGS Over 4 years of follow up , active treatment reduced blood pressure by 9/4 mm Hg . 307 ( 10 % ) individuals assigned active treatment suffered a stroke , compared with 420 ( 14 % ) assigned placebo ( relative risk reduction 28 % [ 95 % CI 17 - 38 ] , p<0.0001 ) . Active treatment also reduced the risk of total major vascular events ( 26 % [ 16 - 34 ] ) . There were similar reductions in the risk of stroke in hypertensive and non-hypertensive subgroups ( all p<0.01 ) . Combination therapy with perindopril plus indapamide reduced blood pressure by 12/5 mm Hg and stroke risk by 43 % ( 30 - 54 ) . Single-drug therapy reduced blood pressure by 5/3 mm Hg and produced no discernable reduction in the risk of stroke . INTERPRETATION This blood-pressure-lowering regimen reduced the risk of stroke among both hypertensive and non-hypertensive individuals with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack . Combination therapy with perindopril and indapamide produced larger blood pressure reductions and larger risk reductions than did single drug therapy with perindopril alone . Treatment with these two agents should now be considered routinely for patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack , irrespective of their blood pressure To collect background data for a prospect i ve clinical trial of beta-blocking agents in the prevention of deaths after stroke , the long-term prognosis in 60 patients discharged from a stroke unit on beta-blocker therapy  was compared with the outcome in 60 matched patients with stroke but without beta-blockers .  Matching included sex , age , type of stroke , and presence or absence of hypertension and cardiac failure . Thirteen patients ( 22 % ) in the beta-blocker group died during a median followup of 41 months . Of the 60 patients not on beta-blockade at discharge , 21 ( 35 % ) died during a median followup of 36 months . By life-table technique and log-rank test , the relative risk for death was 0.60:1.00 ( p = 0.14 ) . During followup , 12 recurrent strokes were observed in patients on beta-blockers and 19 in patients without beta-blockers ( relative risk 0.57:1.00 ; p = 0.12 ) . It appeared that the reduction in mortality could only marginally be ascribed to fewer deaths from myocardial infa rct ion ; other causes of death were also less frequent in beta-blocker-treated patients . The results emphasize that supplementary information on the effect of beta-blocking agents on mortality after stroke is needed before a larger trial of beta-blocker therapy in patients with manifest cerebrovascular disease can be initiated Abstract A prospect i ve r and omised controlled trial of hypotensive therapy in 97 hypertensive patients surviving an ischaemic-type stroke was started in 1964 and terminated 4 years later . The patients were under 80 years of age , consecutively admitted to one hospital and the control and treated groups compared well for age , sex , and severity of hypertension . The drugs used were methyldopa , bethanidine or debrisoquine combined with restriction of salt intake , weight reduction , and thiazide diuretics , and the results were analysed with regard to survival and recurrence rates . Hypertension was defined as diastolic if this pressure was 110 mm . Hg or above , and as systolic if this pressure was over 160 mm . Hg with the diastolic below 110 mm . Hg . The mortality-rate at the end of a 2 to 5 year followup was 26 % in the treated group and 46 % in the untreated , and the non-fatal recurrence-rate 14 % in the treated and 23 % in the controls . Good smooth control was essential to success , untreated patients doing better than those whose control was unsatisfactory . In patients aged over 65 treatment of systolic hypertension was of no benefit , although the diastolic hypertensives improved marginally with treatment . As age increased this effect was progressively less apparent but the figures are probably too small to mean anything . In this series significant improvement occurred in treated hypertensive patients who had survived a stroke if they were aged 65 or below , but not if they were older BACKGROUND Angiotensin-converting-enzyme ( ACE ) inhibitors have been used for more than a decade to treat high blood pressure  , despite the lack of data from r and omised intervention trials to show that such treatment affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality . The Captopril Prevention Project ( CAPPP ) is a r and omised intervention trial to compare the effects of ACE inhibition and conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension . METHODS CAPPP was a prospect i ve , r and omised , open trial with blinded endpoint evaluation . 10,985 patients were enrolled at 536 health centres in Sweden and Finl and . Patients aged 25 - 66 years with a measured diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more on two occasions were r and omly assigned captopril or conventional antihypertensive treatment ( diuretics , beta-blockers ) . Analysis was by intention-to-treat . The primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , stroke , and other cardiovascular deaths . FINDINGS Of 5492 patients assigned captopril and 5493 assigned conventional therapy , 14 and 13 , respectively , were lost to follow-up . Primary endpoint events occurred in 363 patients in the captopril group ( 11.1 per 1000 patient-years ) and 335 in the conventional-treatment group ( 10.2 per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 1.05 [ 95 % CI 0.90 - 1.22 ] , p=0 - 52 ) . Cardiovascular mortality was lower with captopril than with conventional treatment ( 76 vs 95 events ; relative risk 0.77 [ 0.57 - 1 - 04 ] , p=0.092 ) , the rate of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion was similar ( 162 vs 161 ) , but fatal and non-fatal stroke was more common with captopril ( 189 vs 148 ; 1.25 [ 1 - 01 - 1 - 55 ] . p=0.044 ) . INTERPRETATION Captopril and conventional treatment did not differ in efficacy in preventing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality . The difference in stroke risk is probably due to the lower levels of blood pressure obtained initially in previously treated patients r and omised to conventional therapy BACKGROUND Blood pressure reduction achieved with beta-blockers and diuretics is the best recorded intervention to date for prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and death in patients with hypertension . Left ventricular hypertrophy ( LVH ) is a strong independent indicator of risk of cardiovascular morbidity and death . We aim ed to establish whether selective blocking of angiotensin II improves LVH beyond reducing blood pressure and , consequently , reduces cardiovascular morbidity and death . METHODS We did a double-masked , r and omised , parallel-group trial in 9193 participants aged 55 - 80 years with essential hypertension ( sitting blood pressure 160 - 200/95 - 115 mm Hg ) and LVH ascertained by electrocardiography ( ECG ) . We assigned participants once daily losartan-based or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment for at least 4 years and until 1040 patients had a primary cardiovascular event ( death , myocardial infa rct ion , or stroke ) . We used Cox regression analysis to compare regimens . FINDINGS Blood pressure fell by 30.2/16.6 ( SD 18.5/10.1 ) and 29.1/16.8 mm Hg ( 19.2/10.1 ) in the losartan and atenolol groups , respectively . The primary composite endpoint occurred in 508 losartan ( 23.8 per 1000 patient-years ) and 588 atenolol patients ( 27.9 per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 0.87 , 95 % CI 0.77 - 0.98 , p 
    Output:
    
agent
Heterogeneity was present for several outcomes and was partly related to the class of antihypertensive drugs used ; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics separately , and especially together , reduced vascular events , while beta-receptor antagonists had no discernable effect .
Evidence from r and omized controlled trials supports the use of antihypertensive agents in lowering blood pressure for the prevention of vascular events in patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack .
Vascular prevention is associated positively with the magnitude by which blood pressure is reduced
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background and Purpose — The Acute C and esartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survivors ( ACCESS ) study was design ed to assess the safety of modest blood pressure reduction by c and esartan cilexetil in the early treatment of stroke . The study was also design ed to provide an estimate of the number of cases required to perform a larger phase III efficacy study . Methods — Five hundred patients were recruited in a prospect i ve , double-blind , placebo-controlled , r and omized , multicenter phase II study . Results — This safety trial was stopped prematurely when 342 patients ( 339 valid ) had been r and omized because of an imbalance in end points .  Demographic data , cardiovascular risk factors , and blood pressure on admission , on study onset , and within the whole study period were not significantly different between the 2 groups . However , the cumulative 12-month mortality and the number of vascular events differed significantly in favor of the c and esartan cilexetil group ( odds ratio , 0.475 ; 95 % CI , 0.252 to 0.895 ) . There were no significant differences in concomitant medication and in number or type of side effects . Conclusions — Although the mechanisms by which angiotensin type 1 ( AT1 ) receptor blockade affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are still unresolved , the present study shows that early neurohumoral inhibition has similar beneficial effects in cerebral and in myocardial ischemia . The fact that no cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event occurred as a result of hypotension is of significant clinical importance . When there is need for or no contraindication against early antihypertensive therapy , c and esartan cilexetil is a safe therapeutic option according to the ACCESS results BACKGROUND Calcium antagonists are a first-line treatment for hypertension . The effectiveness of diltiazem , a non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist , in reducing cardiovascular morbidity or mortality is unclear . We compared the effects of diltiazem with that of diuretics , beta-blockers , or both on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality  in hypertensive patients . METHODS In a prospect i ve , r and omised , open , blinded endpoint study , we enrolled 10,881 patients , aged 50 - 74 years , at health centres in Norway and Sweden , who had diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more . We r and omly assigned patients diltiazem , or diuretics , beta-blockers , or both . The combined primary endpoint was fatal and non-fatal stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , and other cardiovascular death . Analysis was done by intention to treat . FINDINGS Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lowered effectively in the diltiazem and diuretic and beta-blocker groups ( reduction 20.3/18.7 vs 23.3/18.7 mm Hg ; difference in systolic reduction p<0.001 ) . A primary endpoint occurred in 403 patients in the diltiazem group and in 400 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group ( 16.6 vs 16.2 events per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 1.00 [ 95 % CI 0.87 - 1.15 ] , p=0.97 ) . Fatal and non-fatal stroke occurred in 159 patients in the diltiazem group and in 196 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group ( 6.4 vs 7.9 events per 1000 patient-years ; 0.80 [ 0.65 - 0.99 ] , p=0.04 ) and fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion in 183 and 157 patients ( 7.4 vs 6.3 events per 1000 patient-years ; 1.16 [ 0.94 - 1.44 ] , p=0.17 ) . INTERPRETATION Diltiazem was as effective as treatment based on diuretics , beta-blockers , or both in preventing the combined primary endpoint of all stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , and other cardiovascular death BACKGROUND Blood pressure is a determinant of the risk of stroke among both hypertensive and non-hypertensive individuals with cerebrovascular disease . However , there is uncertainty about the efficacy and safety of blood-pressure-lowering treatments for many such patients . The perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study ( PROGRESS ) was design ed to determine the effects of a blood-pressure-lowering regimen in hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack . METHODS 6105 individuals from 172 centres in Asia , Australasia , and Europe were r and omly assigned active treatment ( n=3051 ) or placebo ( n=3054 ) . Active treatment comprised a flexible regimen based on the angiotensin- converting-enzyme inhibitor perindopril ( 4 mg daily ) , with the addition of the diuretic indapamide at the discretion of treating physicians . The primary outcome was total stroke ( fatal or non-fatal ) . Analysis was by intention to treat . FINDINGS Over 4 years of follow up , active treatment reduced blood pressure by 9/4 mm Hg . 307 ( 10 % ) individuals assigned active treatment suffered a stroke , compared with 420 ( 14 % ) assigned placebo ( relative risk reduction 28 % [ 95 % CI 17 - 38 ] , p<0.0001 ) . Active treatment also reduced the risk of total major vascular events ( 26 % [ 16 - 34 ] ) . There were similar reductions in the risk of stroke in hypertensive and non-hypertensive subgroups ( all p<0.01 ) . Combination therapy with perindopril plus indapamide reduced blood pressure by 12/5 mm Hg and stroke risk by 43 % ( 30 - 54 ) . Single-drug therapy reduced blood pressure by 5/3 mm Hg and produced no discernable reduction in the risk of stroke . INTERPRETATION This blood-pressure-lowering regimen reduced the risk of stroke among both hypertensive and non-hypertensive individuals with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack . Combination therapy with perindopril and indapamide produced larger blood pressure reductions and larger risk reductions than did single drug therapy with perindopril alone . Treatment with these two agents should now be considered routinely for patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack , irrespective of their blood pressure To collect background data for a prospect i ve clinical trial of beta-blocking agents in the prevention of deaths after stroke , the long-term prognosis in 60 patients discharged from a stroke unit on beta-blocker therapy  was compared with the outcome in 60 matched patients with stroke but without beta-blockers .  Matching included sex , age , type of stroke , and presence or absence of hypertension and cardiac failure . Thirteen patients ( 22 % ) in the beta-blocker group died during a median followup of 41 months . Of the 60 patients not on beta-blockade at discharge , 21 ( 35 % ) died during a median followup of 36 months . By life-table technique and log-rank test , the relative risk for death was 0.60:1.00 ( p = 0.14 ) . During followup , 12 recurrent strokes were observed in patients on beta-blockers and 19 in patients without beta-blockers ( relative risk 0.57:1.00 ; p = 0.12 ) . It appeared that the reduction in mortality could only marginally be ascribed to fewer deaths from myocardial infa rct ion ; other causes of death were also less frequent in beta-blocker-treated patients . The results emphasize that supplementary information on the effect of beta-blocking agents on mortality after stroke is needed before a larger trial of beta-blocker therapy in patients with manifest cerebrovascular disease can be initiated Abstract A prospect i ve r and omised controlled trial of hypotensive therapy in 97 hypertensive patients surviving an ischaemic-type stroke was started in 1964 and terminated 4 years later . The patients were under 80 years of age , consecutively admitted to one hospital and the control and treated groups compared well for age , sex , and severity of hypertension . The drugs used were methyldopa , bethanidine or debrisoquine combined with restriction of salt intake , weight reduction , and thiazide diuretics , and the results were analysed with regard to survival and recurrence rates . Hypertension was defined as diastolic if this pressure was 110 mm . Hg or above , and as systolic if this pressure was over 160 mm . Hg with the diastolic below 110 mm . Hg . The mortality-rate at the end of a 2 to 5 year followup was 26 % in the treated group and 46 % in the untreated , and the non-fatal recurrence-rate 14 % in the treated and 23 % in the controls . Good smooth control was essential to success , untreated patients doing better than those whose control was unsatisfactory . In patients aged over 65 treatment of systolic hypertension was of no benefit , although the diastolic hypertensives improved marginally with treatment . As age increased this effect was progressively less apparent but the figures are probably too small to mean anything . In this series significant improvement occurred in treated hypertensive patients who had survived a stroke if they were aged 65 or below , but not if they were older BACKGROUND Angiotensin-converting-enzyme ( ACE ) inhibitors have been used for more than a decade to treat high blood pressure  , despite the lack of data from r and omised intervention trials to show that such treatment affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality . The Captopril Prevention Project ( CAPPP ) is a r and omised intervention trial to compare the effects of ACE inhibition and conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension . METHODS CAPPP was a prospect i ve , r and omised , open trial with blinded endpoint evaluation . 10,985 patients were enrolled at 536 health centres in Sweden and Finl and . Patients aged 25 - 66 years with a measured diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more on two occasions were r and omly assigned captopril or conventional antihypertensive treatment ( diuretics , beta-blockers ) . Analysis was by intention-to-treat . The primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , stroke , and other cardiovascular deaths . FINDINGS Of 5492 patients assigned captopril and 5493 assigned conventional therapy , 14 and 13 , respectively , were lost to follow-up . Primary endpoint events occurred in 363 patients in the captopril group ( 11.1 per 1000 patient-years ) and 335 in the conventional-treatment group ( 10.2 per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 1.05 [ 95 % CI 0.90 - 1.22 ] , p=0 - 52 ) . Cardiovascular mortality was lower with captopril than with conventional treatment ( 76 vs 95 events ; relative risk 0.77 [ 0.57 - 1 - 04 ] , p=0.092 ) , the rate of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion was similar ( 162 vs 161 ) , but fatal and non-fatal stroke was more common with captopril ( 189 vs 148 ; 1.25 [ 1 - 01 - 1 - 55 ] . p=0.044 ) . INTERPRETATION Captopril and conventional treatment did not differ in efficacy in preventing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality . The difference in stroke risk is probably due to the lower levels of blood pressure obtained initially in previously treated patients r and omised to conventional therapy BACKGROUND Blood pressure reduction achieved with beta-blockers and diuretics is the best recorded intervention to date for prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and death in patients with hypertension . Left ventricular hypertrophy ( LVH ) is a strong independent indicator of risk of cardiovascular morbidity and death . We aim ed to establish whether selective blocking of angiotensin II improves LVH beyond reducing blood pressure and , consequently , reduces cardiovascular morbidity and death . METHODS We did a double-masked , r and omised , parallel-group trial in 9193 participants aged 55 - 80 years with essential hypertension ( sitting blood pressure 160 - 200/95 - 115 mm Hg ) and LVH ascertained by electrocardiography ( ECG ) . We assigned participants once daily losartan-based or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment for at least 4 years and until 1040 patients had a primary cardiovascular event ( death , myocardial infa rct ion , or stroke ) . We used Cox regression analysis to compare regimens . FINDINGS Blood pressure fell by 30.2/16.6 ( SD 18.5/10.1 ) and 29.1/16.8 mm Hg ( 19.2/10.1 ) in the losartan and atenolol groups , respectively . The primary composite endpoint occurred in 508 losartan ( 23.8 per 1000 patient-years ) and 588 atenolol patients ( 27.9 per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 0.87 , 95 % CI 0.77 - 0.98 , p 
    Output:
    