human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Enzalutamide ( formerly called MDV3100 ) targets multiple steps in the and rogen-receptor-signaling pathway , the major driver of prostate-cancer growth . We aim ed to evaluate whether enzalutamide prolongs survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy . METHODS In our phase 3 , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial , we stratified 1199 men with castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score and pain intensity . We r and omly assigned them , in a 2:1 ratio , to receive oral enzalutamide at a dose of 160 mg per day ( 800 patients ) or placebo ( 399 patients ) . The primary end point was overall survival . RESULTS The study was stopped after a planned interim analysis at the time of 520 deaths . The median overall survival was 18.4 months ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 17.3 to not yet reached ) in the enzalutamide group versus 13.6 months ( 95 % CI , 11.3 to 15.8 ) in the placebo group ( hazard ratio for death in the enzalutamide group , 0.63 ; 95 % CI , 0.53 to 0.75 ; P<0.001 ) . The superiority of enzalutamide over placebo was shown with respect to all secondary end points : the proportion of patients with a reduction in the prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) level by 50 % or more ( 54 % vs. 2 % , P<0.001 ) , the soft-tissue response rate ( 29 % vs. 4 % , P<0.001 ) , the quality -of-life response rate ( 43 % vs. 18 % , P<0.001 ) , the time to PSA progression ( 8.3 vs. 3.0 months ; hazard ratio , 0.25 ; P<0.001 ) , radiographic progression-free survival ( 8.3 vs. 2.9 months ; hazard ratio , 0.40 ; P<0.001 ) , and the time to the first skeletal-related event ( 16.7 vs. 13.3 months ; hazard ratio , 0.69 ; P<0.001 ) . Rates of fatigue , diarrhea , and hot flashes were higher in the enzalutamide group . Seizures were reported in five patients ( 0.6 % ) receiving enzalutamide . CONCLUSIONS Enzalutamide significantly prolonged the survival of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy . ( Funded by Medivation and Astellas Pharma Global Development ; AFFIRM Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00974311 . ) PURPOSE To assess whether the risk of death is associated with the time to testosterone recovery ( TTR ) after radiotherapy ( RT ) and hormonal therapy ( HT ) for prostate cancer ( PCa ) . PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1995 and 2001 , 206 men with localized , unfavorable-risk PCa were r and omized to receive RT or RT plus 6 months of HT . A multivariate postr and omization Cox regression analysis was used to assess whether the TTR in years was associated with the risk of death after adjusting for the known prognostic factors , age , Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 score , and the use of HT for recurrence . RESULTS Of the 102 men r and omized to receive RT and HT  , 57 ( 56 % ) had a TTR of > 2 years , and none of these men had died of PCa after a median follow-up of 7.6 years . As the TTR increased , the risk of death decreased significantly ( adjusted hazard ratio , 0.60 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.43 - 0.84 ; p = .003 ) . A significant interaction was noted between the TTR and the comorbidity score ( p = .002 ) . The survival estimates were similar ( p = 0.17 ) across the TTR values in men with moderate to severe comorbidity ; however , these estimates increased significantly ( p < .001 ) with decreasing PCa-specific mortality ( p = .006 ) as the TTR increased in men with no or minimal comorbidity . CONCLUSION The results of our study have shown that a longer TTR after RT plus 6 months of HT for unfavorable-risk PCa is associated with a lower risk of death in men with no or minimal comorbidity We conducted a r and omized clinical trial in men with stage D2 prostate cancer to test whether and rogen priming potentiates the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy .  Eighty-five men with progressive prostate cancer refractory to orchiectomy were treated continuously with aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone to lower adrenal and rogen secretion and were administered cyclic intravenous ( IV ) chemotherapy . The patients were r and omized to receive either and rogen priming or no additional treatment for three days before and on the day of chemotherapy . Median duration of follow-up was 43 months . Response rate ( remission plus disease stabilization ) was not significantly different between the stimulation and control arm when the analysis was restricted to evaluable patients ( 79 % v 73 % , respectively ) or when it was extended to all patients ( 46 % v 61 % ) . Median duration of response was similar for the stimulation and control arm ( 9 and 10 months , respectively ) . Median survival was 10 months in the stimulation and 15 months in the control group ( P = .0047 ) . The and rogen sensitivity of the tumors was supported by the greater toxicity in the stimulation arm associated with and rogen administration . Factors found to be independently associated with improved clinical outcome included a high Karnofsky score and hematocrit , long duration of response to the initial castration , and normalization of an elevated serum acid phosphatase on treatment . We conclude that in this group of patients with advanced disease , and rogen priming does not potentiate the efficacy of chemotherapy and is actually associated with a worse outcome . Furthermore , our data emphasize the heterogeneity of biologic behavior of prostate cancer BACKGROUND Previous r and omised trials demonstrated that adjuvant radiation therapy ( aRT ) improves cancer control in patients with pT3 prostate cancer ( PCa ) . However , there is currently no evidence supporting early salvage radiation therapy ( eSRT ) as equivalent to aRT in improving freedom from biochemical recurrence ( BCR ) after radical prostatectomy ( RP ) . OBJECTIVE To evaluate BCR-free survival for aRT versus observation followed by eSRT in cases of relapse in patients undergoing RP for pT3pN0 , R0-R1 PCa . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS Using a European multi-institutional cohort , 890 men with pT3pN0 , R0-R1 PCa were identified . INTERVENTION All patients underwent RP . Subsequently , patients were stratified into two groups : aRT versus initial observation followed by eSRT in cases of relapse . OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES : Propensity-matched analysis was employed , and patients were stratified into two groups : aRT versus observation and eventual eSRT , defined as RT given at a postoperative serum prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) ≤ 0.5 ng/ml at least 6 mo after RP . BCR , defined as PSA > 0.20 ng/ml and rising after administration of RT , was compared between aRT and initial observation followed by eSRT in cases of relapse using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods . RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall , 390 ( 43.8 % ) and 500 ( 56.2 % ) patients were treated with aRT and initial observation , respectively . Within the latter group , 225 ( 45.0 % ) patients experienced BCR and underwent eSRT . In the postpropensity-matched cohort , the 2- and 5-yr BCR-free survival rates were 91.4 % and 78.4 % in aRT versus 92.8 % and 81.8 % in patients who underwent initial observation and eSRT in cases of relapse , respectively ( p=0.9 ) . No differences in the 2- and 5-yr BCR-free survival rates were found , even when patients were stratified according to pT3 substage and surgical margin status ( all p ≥ 0.4 ) . These findings were also confirmed in multivariable analyses ( p=0.6 ) . Similar results were achieved when the cut-off to define eSRT was set at 0.3 ng/ml ( all p ≥ 0.5 ) . CONCLUSIONS The current study suggests that timely administration of eSRT is comparable to aRT in improving BCR-free survival in the majority of pT3pN0 PCa patients .  Therefore , eSRT may not compromise cancer control but significantly reduces overtreatment associated with aRT To evaluate the efficacy and safety of degarelix , a new gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone ( GnRH ) antagonist ( blocker ) , vs leuprolide for achieving and maintaining testosterone suppression in a 1‐year phase III trial involving patients with prostate cancer PURPOSE To up date eligibility and outcome measures in trials that evaluate systemic treatment for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone . METHODS A committee of investigators experienced in conducting trials for prostate cancer defined new consensus criteria by review ing previous criteria , Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors ( RECIST ) , and emerging trial data . RESULTS The Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group ( PCWG2 ) recommends a two- objective paradigm : ( 1 ) controlling , relieving , or eliminating disease manifestations that are present when treatment is initiated and ( 2 ) preventing or delaying disease manifestations expected to occur . Prostate cancers progressing despite castrate levels of testosterone are considered castration resistant and not hormone refractory . Eligibility is defined using st and ard disease assessment s to authenticate disease progression , prior treatment , distinct clinical subtypes , and predictive models . Outcomes are reported independently for prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) , imaging , and clinical measures , avoiding grouped categorizations such as complete or partial response . In most trials , early changes in PSA and /or pain are not acted on without other evidence of disease progression , and treatment should be continued for at least 12 weeks to ensure adequate drug exposure . Bone scans are reported as " new lesions " or " no new lesions , " changes in soft-tissue disease assessed by RECIST , and pain using vali date d scales . Defining eligibility for prevent/delay end points requires attention to estimated event frequency and /or r and om assignment to a control group . CONCLUSION PCWG2 recommends increasing emphasis on time-to-event end points ( ie , failure to progress ) as decision aids in proceeding from phase II to phase III trials . Recommendations will evolve as data are generated on the utility of intermediate end points to predict clinical benefit PURPOSE Prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) is a glycoprotein that is found almost exclusively in normal and neoplastic prostate cells . For patients with metastatic disease , changes in PSA will often ante date changes in bone scan . Furthermore , many but not all investigators have observed an association between a decline in PSA levels of 50 % or greater and survival . Since the majority of phase II clinical trials for patients with and rogen-independent prostate cancer ( AIPC ) have used PSA as a marker , we believed it was important for investigators to agree on definitions and values for a minimum set of parameters for eligibility and PSA declines and to develop a common approach to outcome analysis and reporting . We held a consensus conference with 26 leading investigators in the field of AIPC to define these parameters . RESULT We defined four patient groups : ( 1 ) progressive measurable disease , ( 2 ) progressive bone metastasis , ( 3 ) stable metastases and a rising PSA , and ( 4 ) rising PSA and no other evidence of metastatic disease .  The purpose of determining the number of patients whose PSA level drops in a phase II trial of AIPC is to guide the selection of agents for further testing and phase III trials . We propose that investigators report at a minimum a PSA decline of at least 50 % and this must be confirmed by a second PSA value 4 or more weeks later . Patients may not demonstrate clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression during this time period . Some investigators may want to report additional measures of PSA changes ( ie , 75 % decline , 90 % decline ) . Response duration and the time to PSA progression may also be important clinical end point . CONCLUSION Through this consensus conference , we believe we have developed practical guidelines for using PSA as a measurement of outcome . Furthermore , the use of common st and ards is important as we determine which agents should progress to r and omized trials which will use survival as an end point BACKGROUND Sipuleucel-T , an autologous active cellular immunotherapy , has shown evidence of efficacy in reducing the risk of death among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer . METHODS In this double-blind , placebo-controlled , multicenter phase 3 trial , we r and omly assigned 512 patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive either sipuleucel-T ( 341 patients ) or placebo ( 171 patients ) administered intravenously every 2 weeks , for a total of three infusions . The primary end point was overall survival , analyzed by means of a stratified Cox regression model adjusted for baseline levels of serum prostate-specific antigen ( 
    Output:
    
agent
Complete and rogen blockade has a small survival benefit of about 5 % .
Intermittent and rogen deprivation ( IAD ) results in equivalent oncologic efficacy when compared with continuous and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) in well-selected population s. In locally advanced and metastatic PCa , early ADT does not result in a significant survival advantage when compared with delayed ADT .
Zoledronic acid and denusomab can be used in men with CRPC and osseous metastases to prevent skeletal-related complications .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Enzalutamide ( formerly called MDV3100 ) targets multiple steps in the and rogen-receptor-signaling pathway , the major driver of prostate-cancer growth . We aim ed to evaluate whether enzalutamide prolongs survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy . METHODS In our phase 3 , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial , we stratified 1199 men with castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score and pain intensity . We r and omly assigned them , in a 2:1 ratio , to receive oral enzalutamide at a dose of 160 mg per day ( 800 patients ) or placebo ( 399 patients ) . The primary end point was overall survival . RESULTS The study was stopped after a planned interim analysis at the time of 520 deaths . The median overall survival was 18.4 months ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 17.3 to not yet reached ) in the enzalutamide group versus 13.6 months ( 95 % CI , 11.3 to 15.8 ) in the placebo group ( hazard ratio for death in the enzalutamide group , 0.63 ; 95 % CI , 0.53 to 0.75 ; P<0.001 ) . The superiority of enzalutamide over placebo was shown with respect to all secondary end points : the proportion of patients with a reduction in the prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) level by 50 % or more ( 54 % vs. 2 % , P<0.001 ) , the soft-tissue response rate ( 29 % vs. 4 % , P<0.001 ) , the quality -of-life response rate ( 43 % vs. 18 % , P<0.001 ) , the time to PSA progression ( 8.3 vs. 3.0 months ; hazard ratio , 0.25 ; P<0.001 ) , radiographic progression-free survival ( 8.3 vs. 2.9 months ; hazard ratio , 0.40 ; P<0.001 ) , and the time to the first skeletal-related event ( 16.7 vs. 13.3 months ; hazard ratio , 0.69 ; P<0.001 ) . Rates of fatigue , diarrhea , and hot flashes were higher in the enzalutamide group . Seizures were reported in five patients ( 0.6 % ) receiving enzalutamide . CONCLUSIONS Enzalutamide significantly prolonged the survival of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy . ( Funded by Medivation and Astellas Pharma Global Development ; AFFIRM Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00974311 . ) PURPOSE To assess whether the risk of death is associated with the time to testosterone recovery ( TTR ) after radiotherapy ( RT ) and hormonal therapy ( HT ) for prostate cancer ( PCa ) . PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1995 and 2001 , 206 men with localized , unfavorable-risk PCa were r and omized to receive RT or RT plus 6 months of HT . A multivariate postr and omization Cox regression analysis was used to assess whether the TTR in years was associated with the risk of death after adjusting for the known prognostic factors , age , Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 score , and the use of HT for recurrence . RESULTS Of the 102 men r and omized to receive RT and HT  , 57 ( 56 % ) had a TTR of > 2 years , and none of these men had died of PCa after a median follow-up of 7.6 years . As the TTR increased , the risk of death decreased significantly ( adjusted hazard ratio , 0.60 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.43 - 0.84 ; p = .003 ) . A significant interaction was noted between the TTR and the comorbidity score ( p = .002 ) . The survival estimates were similar ( p = 0.17 ) across the TTR values in men with moderate to severe comorbidity ; however , these estimates increased significantly ( p < .001 ) with decreasing PCa-specific mortality ( p = .006 ) as the TTR increased in men with no or minimal comorbidity . CONCLUSION The results of our study have shown that a longer TTR after RT plus 6 months of HT for unfavorable-risk PCa is associated with a lower risk of death in men with no or minimal comorbidity We conducted a r and omized clinical trial in men with stage D2 prostate cancer to test whether and rogen priming potentiates the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy .  Eighty-five men with progressive prostate cancer refractory to orchiectomy were treated continuously with aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone to lower adrenal and rogen secretion and were administered cyclic intravenous ( IV ) chemotherapy . The patients were r and omized to receive either and rogen priming or no additional treatment for three days before and on the day of chemotherapy . Median duration of follow-up was 43 months . Response rate ( remission plus disease stabilization ) was not significantly different between the stimulation and control arm when the analysis was restricted to evaluable patients ( 79 % v 73 % , respectively ) or when it was extended to all patients ( 46 % v 61 % ) . Median duration of response was similar for the stimulation and control arm ( 9 and 10 months , respectively ) . Median survival was 10 months in the stimulation and 15 months in the control group ( P = .0047 ) . The and rogen sensitivity of the tumors was supported by the greater toxicity in the stimulation arm associated with and rogen administration . Factors found to be independently associated with improved clinical outcome included a high Karnofsky score and hematocrit , long duration of response to the initial castration , and normalization of an elevated serum acid phosphatase on treatment . We conclude that in this group of patients with advanced disease , and rogen priming does not potentiate the efficacy of chemotherapy and is actually associated with a worse outcome . Furthermore , our data emphasize the heterogeneity of biologic behavior of prostate cancer BACKGROUND Previous r and omised trials demonstrated that adjuvant radiation therapy ( aRT ) improves cancer control in patients with pT3 prostate cancer ( PCa ) . However , there is currently no evidence supporting early salvage radiation therapy ( eSRT ) as equivalent to aRT in improving freedom from biochemical recurrence ( BCR ) after radical prostatectomy ( RP ) . OBJECTIVE To evaluate BCR-free survival for aRT versus observation followed by eSRT in cases of relapse in patients undergoing RP for pT3pN0 , R0-R1 PCa . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS Using a European multi-institutional cohort , 890 men with pT3pN0 , R0-R1 PCa were identified . INTERVENTION All patients underwent RP . Subsequently , patients were stratified into two groups : aRT versus initial observation followed by eSRT in cases of relapse . OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES : Propensity-matched analysis was employed , and patients were stratified into two groups : aRT versus observation and eventual eSRT , defined as RT given at a postoperative serum prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) ≤ 0.5 ng/ml at least 6 mo after RP . BCR , defined as PSA > 0.20 ng/ml and rising after administration of RT , was compared between aRT and initial observation followed by eSRT in cases of relapse using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods . RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall , 390 ( 43.8 % ) and 500 ( 56.2 % ) patients were treated with aRT and initial observation , respectively . Within the latter group , 225 ( 45.0 % ) patients experienced BCR and underwent eSRT . In the postpropensity-matched cohort , the 2- and 5-yr BCR-free survival rates were 91.4 % and 78.4 % in aRT versus 92.8 % and 81.8 % in patients who underwent initial observation and eSRT in cases of relapse , respectively ( p=0.9 ) . No differences in the 2- and 5-yr BCR-free survival rates were found , even when patients were stratified according to pT3 substage and surgical margin status ( all p ≥ 0.4 ) . These findings were also confirmed in multivariable analyses ( p=0.6 ) . Similar results were achieved when the cut-off to define eSRT was set at 0.3 ng/ml ( all p ≥ 0.5 ) . CONCLUSIONS The current study suggests that timely administration of eSRT is comparable to aRT in improving BCR-free survival in the majority of pT3pN0 PCa patients .  Therefore , eSRT may not compromise cancer control but significantly reduces overtreatment associated with aRT To evaluate the efficacy and safety of degarelix , a new gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone ( GnRH ) antagonist ( blocker ) , vs leuprolide for achieving and maintaining testosterone suppression in a 1‐year phase III trial involving patients with prostate cancer PURPOSE To up date eligibility and outcome measures in trials that evaluate systemic treatment for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone . METHODS A committee of investigators experienced in conducting trials for prostate cancer defined new consensus criteria by review ing previous criteria , Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors ( RECIST ) , and emerging trial data . RESULTS The Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group ( PCWG2 ) recommends a two- objective paradigm : ( 1 ) controlling , relieving , or eliminating disease manifestations that are present when treatment is initiated and ( 2 ) preventing or delaying disease manifestations expected to occur . Prostate cancers progressing despite castrate levels of testosterone are considered castration resistant and not hormone refractory . Eligibility is defined using st and ard disease assessment s to authenticate disease progression , prior treatment , distinct clinical subtypes , and predictive models . Outcomes are reported independently for prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) , imaging , and clinical measures , avoiding grouped categorizations such as complete or partial response . In most trials , early changes in PSA and /or pain are not acted on without other evidence of disease progression , and treatment should be continued for at least 12 weeks to ensure adequate drug exposure . Bone scans are reported as " new lesions " or " no new lesions , " changes in soft-tissue disease assessed by RECIST , and pain using vali date d scales . Defining eligibility for prevent/delay end points requires attention to estimated event frequency and /or r and om assignment to a control group . CONCLUSION PCWG2 recommends increasing emphasis on time-to-event end points ( ie , failure to progress ) as decision aids in proceeding from phase II to phase III trials . Recommendations will evolve as data are generated on the utility of intermediate end points to predict clinical benefit PURPOSE Prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) is a glycoprotein that is found almost exclusively in normal and neoplastic prostate cells . For patients with metastatic disease , changes in PSA will often ante date changes in bone scan . Furthermore , many but not all investigators have observed an association between a decline in PSA levels of 50 % or greater and survival . Since the majority of phase II clinical trials for patients with and rogen-independent prostate cancer ( AIPC ) have used PSA as a marker , we believed it was important for investigators to agree on definitions and values for a minimum set of parameters for eligibility and PSA declines and to develop a common approach to outcome analysis and reporting . We held a consensus conference with 26 leading investigators in the field of AIPC to define these parameters . RESULT We defined four patient groups : ( 1 ) progressive measurable disease , ( 2 ) progressive bone metastasis , ( 3 ) stable metastases and a rising PSA , and ( 4 ) rising PSA and no other evidence of metastatic disease .  The purpose of determining the number of patients whose PSA level drops in a phase II trial of AIPC is to guide the selection of agents for further testing and phase III trials . We propose that investigators report at a minimum a PSA decline of at least 50 % and this must be confirmed by a second PSA value 4 or more weeks later . Patients may not demonstrate clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression during this time period . Some investigators may want to report additional measures of PSA changes ( ie , 75 % decline , 90 % decline ) . Response duration and the time to PSA progression may also be important clinical end point . CONCLUSION Through this consensus conference , we believe we have developed practical guidelines for using PSA as a measurement of outcome . Furthermore , the use of common st and ards is important as we determine which agents should progress to r and omized trials which will use survival as an end point BACKGROUND Sipuleucel-T , an autologous active cellular immunotherapy , has shown evidence of efficacy in reducing the risk of death among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer . METHODS In this double-blind , placebo-controlled , multicenter phase 3 trial , we r and omly assigned 512 patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive either sipuleucel-T ( 341 patients ) or placebo ( 171 patients ) administered intravenously every 2 weeks , for a total of three infusions . The primary end point was overall survival , analyzed by means of a stratified Cox regression model adjusted for baseline levels of serum prostate-specific antigen ( 
    Output:
    