human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND The Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) found that an intensive lifestyle intervention can reduce the development of diabetes by more than half in adults with prediabetes , but there is little information about the feasibility of offering such an intervention in community setting s. This study evaluated the delivery of a group-based DPP lifestyle intervention in partnership with the YMCA . METHODS This pilot cluster-r and omized trial was design ed to compare group-based DPP lifestyle intervention delivery by the YMCA to brief counseling alone ( control ) in adults who attended a diabetes risk-screening event at one of two semi-urban YMCA facilities and who had a BMI > or=24 kg/m2 , > or=2 diabetes risk factors , and a r and om capillary blood glucose of 110 - 199 mg/dL. Multivariate regression was used to compare between-group differences in changes in body weight , blood pressures , HbA1c , total cholesterol , and HDL-cholesterol after 6 and 12 months . RESULTS Among 92 participants , controls were more often women ( 61 % vs 50 % ) and of nonwhite race ( 29 % vs 7 % ) . After 6 months , body weight decreased by 6.0 % ( 95 % CI=4.7 , 7.3 ) in intervention participants and 2.0 % ( 95 % CI=0.6 , 3.3 ) in controls ( p<0.001 ; difference between groups ) . Intervention participants also had greater changes in total cholesterol ( -22 mg/dL vs + 6 mg/dL controls ; p<0.001 ) . These differences were sustained after 12 months , and adjustment for differences in race and gender did not alter these findings . With only two matched YMCA sites , it was not possible to adjust for potential clustering by site . CONCLUSIONS The YMCA may be a promising channel for wide-scale dissemination of a low-cost approach to lifestyle diabetes prevention Purpose The objective was to take prevention from the clinic to the community by including a high-risk group and working with the community to tailor , enhance , deliver , and evaluate a community-based version of the Diabetes Prevention Program ’s ( DPP ) clinic-based lifestyle intervention . Methods This was a nonr and omized prospect i ve study using a single-group design . Study eligibility included a screening glucose value in the normal to prediabetes range with no current diagnosis of diabetes , overweight , not pregnant nor planning to become pregnant during study period , aged 18 to 65 , Latino , living in the study target communities , and no reported medical restrictions related to the program goals . A total of 69 individuals participated . The Healthy Living Program ( HLP ) was based on the DPP ’s 1-year intensive lifestyle program , was tailored and enhanced for a Latino community , and was delivered by community health workers . Anthropometric and paper and pencil measures were administered to examine program outcome at 6 months and 12 months . Results In general , results indicate statistically significant improvements in anthropometrics and many behavioral outcomes , particularly at 6 months . Participants demonstrated forward movement through the stages of change during the program . Conclusions Results support the effectiveness of the intervention and show that delivery of the translated version of the DPP ’s lifestyle intervention in the community by community residents holds promise as one strategy to reach people at increased risk of developing diabetes . Use of this translation model , including collaboration with community health workers , offers diabetes educators an opportunity to extend their reach into underserved communities Asian Americans experience diabetes at a higher rate than non-Hispanic whites . Diabetes prevention programs using lifestyle interventions have been shown to produce beneficial results , yet there have been no culturally-tailored programs for diabetes prevention in the Korean community . We explore the impact and feasibility of a pilot Community Health Worker ( CHW ) intervention to improve health behaviors and promote diabetes prevention  among Korean Americans using a r and omized controlled trial . Between 2011 and 2012 , a total of 48 Korean Americans at risk for diabetes living in New York City ( NYC ) participated in the intervention . Participants were allocated to treatment or control groups . A community-based participatory research approach guided development of the intervention , which consisted of 6 workshops held by CHWs on diabetes prevention , nutrition , physical activity , diabetes complications , stress and family support , and access to health care . Changes over 6 months were examined for clinical measurements ( weight , BMI , waist circumference , blood pressure , glucose , and cholesterol ) ; health behaviors ( physical activity , nutrition , food behaviors , diabetes knowledge , self-efficacy , and mental health ) ; and health access ( insurance and self-reported health ) . In this small pilot study , changes were seen in weight , waist circumference , diastolic blood pressure , physical activity nutrition , diabetes knowledge , and mental health . Qualitative findings provide additional context ual information that inform ways in which CHWs may influence health outcomes . These findings demonstrate that a diabetes prevention program can be successful among a Korean American population in NYC , and important insight is provided for ways that programs can be tailored to meet the needs of vulnerable population Prevention of type 2 diabetes by intensive lifestyle intervention design ed to achieve and maintain ideal body weight was assessed in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) . Male subjects with IGT recruited from health-screening examinees were r and omly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to a st and ard intervention group ( control group ) and intensive intervention group ( intervention group ) . The final numbers of subjects were 356 and 102 , respectively . The subjects in the control group and in the intervention group were advised to maintain body mass index ( BMI ) of < 24.0 kg/m2 and of < 22.0 kg/m2 , respectively , by diet and exercise . In the intervention group , detailed instructions on lifestyle were repeated every 3 - 4 months during hospital visits . Diabetes was judged to have developed when two or more consecutive fasting plasma glucose ( FPG ) values exceeded 140 mg/dl . A 100 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed every 6 months to detect improvement of glucose tolerance . The subjects were seen in an ordinary outpatient clinic . The cumulative 4-year incidence of diabetes was 9.3 % in the control group , versus 3.0 % in the intervention group , and the reduction in risk of diabetes was 67.4 % ( P < 0.001 ) . Body weight decreased by 0.39 kg in the control group and by 2.18 kg in the intervention group ( P < 0.001 ) . The control group was subclassified according to increase and decrease in body weight . The incidence of diabetes was positively correlated with the changes in body weight , and the improvement in glucose tolerance was negatively correlated . Subjects with higher FPG at baseline developed diabetes at a higher rate than those with lower FPG . Higher 2h plasma glucose values and higher BMI values at baseline were also associated with a higher incidence of diabetes , but the differences were not significant . Subjects with a low insulinogenic index ( DeltaIRI/DeltaPG 30 min after an oral glucose load ) developed diabetes at a significantly higher rate than those with a normal insulinogenic index . Comparison of the BMI data and incidence of diabetes in five diabetes prevention studies by lifestyle intervention revealed a linear correlation between the incidence of diabetes and the BMI values , with the exception of the DaQing Study . However , the slope of the reduction in incidence of diabetes in the intensive intervention groups was steeper than expected simply on the basis of the reduction of BMI , suggesting that the effect of lifestyle intervention can not be solely ascribed to the body weight reduction . We conclude that lifestyle intervention aim ed at achieving ideal body weight in men with IGT  is effective and can be conducted in an outpatient clinic setting BACKGROUND The Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) lifestyle intervention reduced the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus ( DM ) among high-risk adults by 58 % , with weight loss as the dominant predictor . However , it has not been adequately translated into primary care . METHODS We evaluated 2 adapted DPP lifestyle interventions  among overweight or obese adults who were recruited from 1 primary care clinic and had pre-DM and /or metabolic syndrome . Participants were r and omized to ( 1 ) a coach-led group intervention ( n = 79 ) , ( 2 ) a self-directed DVD intervention ( n = 81 ) , or ( 3 ) usual care ( n = 81 ) . During a 3-month intensive intervention phase , the DPP-based behavioral weight-loss curriculum was delivered by lifestyle coach-led small groups or home-based DVD . During the maintenance phase , participants in both interventions received lifestyle change coaching and support remotely-through secure email within an electronic health record system and the American Heart Association Heart360 website for weight and physical activity goal setting and self-monitoring . The primary outcome was change in body mass index ( BMI ) ( calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared ) from baseline to 15 months . RESULTS At baseline , participants had a mean ( SD ) age of 52.9 ( 10.6 ) years and a mean BMI of 32.0 ( 5.4 ) ; 47 % were female ; 78 % , non-Hispanic white ; and 17 % , Asian/Pacific Isl and er . At month 15 , the mean ± SE change in BMI from baseline was -2.2 ± 0.3 in the coach-led group vs -0.9 ± 0.3 in the usual care group ( P < .001 ) and -1.6 ± 0.3 in the self-directed group vs usual care ( P = .02 ) . The percentages of participants who achieved the 7 % DPP-based weight-loss goal were 37.0 % ( P = .003 ) and 35.9 % ( P = .004 ) in the coach-led and self-directed groups , respectively , vs 14.4 % in the usual care group . Both interventions also achieved greater net improvements in waist circumference and fasting plasma glucose level . CONCLUSION Proven effective in a primary care setting , the 2 DPP-based lifestyle interventions are readily scalable and exportable with potential for substantial clinical and public health impact . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00842426 Background : Research on the translation of efficacious lifestyle change programs to prevent type 2 diabetes into community or clinical setting s is needed . Objective : The objective of this study was to examine the reach , implementation , and efficacy of a 6-month lifestyle program implemented in primary care by nurse practitioners ( NPs ) for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes . Methods : The NP sites ( n = 4 ) were r and omized to an enhanced st and ard care program ( one  NP  and one  nutrition session ) or a lifestyle program ( enhanced st and ard care and six NP sessions ) . These NPs recruited adults at risk of diabetes from their practice ( n = 58 ) , with an acceptance rate of 70 % . Results : The program reached a diverse , obese , and moderately low income sample . The NPs were able to successfully implement the protocol s. The average length of the program was 9.3 months . Attendance was high ( 98 % ) , and attrition was low ( 12 % ) . The NPs were able to adopt the educational , behavioral , and psychosocial strategies of the intervention easily . Motivational interviewing was more difficult for NPs . Mixed-model repeated- measures analysis indicated significant trends or improvement in both groups for nutrition and exercise behavior . Participants of the lifestyle program demonstrated trends for better high-density lipoprotein ( HDL ) and exercise behavior compared with the enhanced st and ard care participants . Twenty-five percent of lifestyle participants met treatment goals of 5 % weight loss compared with 11 % of st and ard care participants . Discussion : A lifestyle program can be implemented in primary care by NPs , reach the targeted population , and be modestly successful . Further research is indicated Introduction Although lifestyle interventions are effective in delaying the onset of diabetes , translating these lessons to routine health care setting s remains a challenge . We investigated the effectiveness of a theory-based , brief , small-group weight loss intervention for diabetes prevention . A secondary purpose was to determine the potential reach of the intervention . Methods A total of 14,379 members of an integrated health care organization newly diagnosed with prediabetes were potentially eligible to participate in this matched cohort longitudinal study . Of this group , 1,030 attended a 90-minute , small-group session that targeted personal action planning for healthful eating , physical activity , and weight management . We accessed electronic medical records to select 1 to 2 controls ( matched on impaired fasting glucose measurement , sex , age , and body mass index ) for each member who attended the small-group session ( n = 760 ) . Weight change , as recorded in the medical record , was the primary outcome . Mixed models analyses were used to adjust for matching variables and covariates and to account for individual r and om effects over time . Results Small-group participants  lost significantly more weight than did their matched controls . A significantly higher proportion of small-group participants  lost at least 5 % of their body weight compared with controls . Conclusion A brief , small-group weight loss intervention was effective . However , it did not reach broadly into the population that was at risk for diabetes Objective To evaluate the use and effectiveness of two “ in-home ” strategies for delivering diabetes prevention programming using cable television . Methods An individually r and omized , two-arm intervention trial including adults with diabetes risk factors living in two US cities . 
    Output:
    
agent
Findings are subject to incomplete reporting and heterogeneity of studies included , and confounding because most included studies used pre-post study design s. CONCLUSIONS DPP lifestyle modification programs achieved clinical ly meaningful weight and cardiometabolic health improvements .
Together , these data suggest that additional value is gained from these programs , reinforcing that they are likely very cost-effective
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND The Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) found that an intensive lifestyle intervention can reduce the development of diabetes by more than half in adults with prediabetes , but there is little information about the feasibility of offering such an intervention in community setting s. This study evaluated the delivery of a group-based DPP lifestyle intervention in partnership with the YMCA . METHODS This pilot cluster-r and omized trial was design ed to compare group-based DPP lifestyle intervention delivery by the YMCA to brief counseling alone ( control ) in adults who attended a diabetes risk-screening event at one of two semi-urban YMCA facilities and who had a BMI > or=24 kg/m2 , > or=2 diabetes risk factors , and a r and om capillary blood glucose of 110 - 199 mg/dL. Multivariate regression was used to compare between-group differences in changes in body weight , blood pressures , HbA1c , total cholesterol , and HDL-cholesterol after 6 and 12 months . RESULTS Among 92 participants , controls were more often women ( 61 % vs 50 % ) and of nonwhite race ( 29 % vs 7 % ) . After 6 months , body weight decreased by 6.0 % ( 95 % CI=4.7 , 7.3 ) in intervention participants and 2.0 % ( 95 % CI=0.6 , 3.3 ) in controls ( p<0.001 ; difference between groups ) . Intervention participants also had greater changes in total cholesterol ( -22 mg/dL vs + 6 mg/dL controls ; p<0.001 ) . These differences were sustained after 12 months , and adjustment for differences in race and gender did not alter these findings . With only two matched YMCA sites , it was not possible to adjust for potential clustering by site . CONCLUSIONS The YMCA may be a promising channel for wide-scale dissemination of a low-cost approach to lifestyle diabetes prevention Purpose The objective was to take prevention from the clinic to the community by including a high-risk group and working with the community to tailor , enhance , deliver , and evaluate a community-based version of the Diabetes Prevention Program ’s ( DPP ) clinic-based lifestyle intervention . Methods This was a nonr and omized prospect i ve study using a single-group design . Study eligibility included a screening glucose value in the normal to prediabetes range with no current diagnosis of diabetes , overweight , not pregnant nor planning to become pregnant during study period , aged 18 to 65 , Latino , living in the study target communities , and no reported medical restrictions related to the program goals . A total of 69 individuals participated . The Healthy Living Program ( HLP ) was based on the DPP ’s 1-year intensive lifestyle program , was tailored and enhanced for a Latino community , and was delivered by community health workers . Anthropometric and paper and pencil measures were administered to examine program outcome at 6 months and 12 months . Results In general , results indicate statistically significant improvements in anthropometrics and many behavioral outcomes , particularly at 6 months . Participants demonstrated forward movement through the stages of change during the program . Conclusions Results support the effectiveness of the intervention and show that delivery of the translated version of the DPP ’s lifestyle intervention in the community by community residents holds promise as one strategy to reach people at increased risk of developing diabetes . Use of this translation model , including collaboration with community health workers , offers diabetes educators an opportunity to extend their reach into underserved communities Asian Americans experience diabetes at a higher rate than non-Hispanic whites . Diabetes prevention programs using lifestyle interventions have been shown to produce beneficial results , yet there have been no culturally-tailored programs for diabetes prevention in the Korean community . We explore the impact and feasibility of a pilot Community Health Worker ( CHW ) intervention to improve health behaviors and promote diabetes prevention  among Korean Americans using a r and omized controlled trial . Between 2011 and 2012 , a total of 48 Korean Americans at risk for diabetes living in New York City ( NYC ) participated in the intervention . Participants were allocated to treatment or control groups . A community-based participatory research approach guided development of the intervention , which consisted of 6 workshops held by CHWs on diabetes prevention , nutrition , physical activity , diabetes complications , stress and family support , and access to health care . Changes over 6 months were examined for clinical measurements ( weight , BMI , waist circumference , blood pressure , glucose , and cholesterol ) ; health behaviors ( physical activity , nutrition , food behaviors , diabetes knowledge , self-efficacy , and mental health ) ; and health access ( insurance and self-reported health ) . In this small pilot study , changes were seen in weight , waist circumference , diastolic blood pressure , physical activity nutrition , diabetes knowledge , and mental health . Qualitative findings provide additional context ual information that inform ways in which CHWs may influence health outcomes . These findings demonstrate that a diabetes prevention program can be successful among a Korean American population in NYC , and important insight is provided for ways that programs can be tailored to meet the needs of vulnerable population Prevention of type 2 diabetes by intensive lifestyle intervention design ed to achieve and maintain ideal body weight was assessed in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) . Male subjects with IGT recruited from health-screening examinees were r and omly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to a st and ard intervention group ( control group ) and intensive intervention group ( intervention group ) . The final numbers of subjects were 356 and 102 , respectively . The subjects in the control group and in the intervention group were advised to maintain body mass index ( BMI ) of < 24.0 kg/m2 and of < 22.0 kg/m2 , respectively , by diet and exercise . In the intervention group , detailed instructions on lifestyle were repeated every 3 - 4 months during hospital visits . Diabetes was judged to have developed when two or more consecutive fasting plasma glucose ( FPG ) values exceeded 140 mg/dl . A 100 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed every 6 months to detect improvement of glucose tolerance . The subjects were seen in an ordinary outpatient clinic . The cumulative 4-year incidence of diabetes was 9.3 % in the control group , versus 3.0 % in the intervention group , and the reduction in risk of diabetes was 67.4 % ( P < 0.001 ) . Body weight decreased by 0.39 kg in the control group and by 2.18 kg in the intervention group ( P < 0.001 ) . The control group was subclassified according to increase and decrease in body weight . The incidence of diabetes was positively correlated with the changes in body weight , and the improvement in glucose tolerance was negatively correlated . Subjects with higher FPG at baseline developed diabetes at a higher rate than those with lower FPG . Higher 2h plasma glucose values and higher BMI values at baseline were also associated with a higher incidence of diabetes , but the differences were not significant . Subjects with a low insulinogenic index ( DeltaIRI/DeltaPG 30 min after an oral glucose load ) developed diabetes at a significantly higher rate than those with a normal insulinogenic index . Comparison of the BMI data and incidence of diabetes in five diabetes prevention studies by lifestyle intervention revealed a linear correlation between the incidence of diabetes and the BMI values , with the exception of the DaQing Study . However , the slope of the reduction in incidence of diabetes in the intensive intervention groups was steeper than expected simply on the basis of the reduction of BMI , suggesting that the effect of lifestyle intervention can not be solely ascribed to the body weight reduction . We conclude that lifestyle intervention aim ed at achieving ideal body weight in men with IGT  is effective and can be conducted in an outpatient clinic setting BACKGROUND The Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) lifestyle intervention reduced the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus ( DM ) among high-risk adults by 58 % , with weight loss as the dominant predictor . However , it has not been adequately translated into primary care . METHODS We evaluated 2 adapted DPP lifestyle interventions  among overweight or obese adults who were recruited from 1 primary care clinic and had pre-DM and /or metabolic syndrome . Participants were r and omized to ( 1 ) a coach-led group intervention ( n = 79 ) , ( 2 ) a self-directed DVD intervention ( n = 81 ) , or ( 3 ) usual care ( n = 81 ) . During a 3-month intensive intervention phase , the DPP-based behavioral weight-loss curriculum was delivered by lifestyle coach-led small groups or home-based DVD . During the maintenance phase , participants in both interventions received lifestyle change coaching and support remotely-through secure email within an electronic health record system and the American Heart Association Heart360 website for weight and physical activity goal setting and self-monitoring . The primary outcome was change in body mass index ( BMI ) ( calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared ) from baseline to 15 months . RESULTS At baseline , participants had a mean ( SD ) age of 52.9 ( 10.6 ) years and a mean BMI of 32.0 ( 5.4 ) ; 47 % were female ; 78 % , non-Hispanic white ; and 17 % , Asian/Pacific Isl and er . At month 15 , the mean ± SE change in BMI from baseline was -2.2 ± 0.3 in the coach-led group vs -0.9 ± 0.3 in the usual care group ( P < .001 ) and -1.6 ± 0.3 in the self-directed group vs usual care ( P = .02 ) . The percentages of participants who achieved the 7 % DPP-based weight-loss goal were 37.0 % ( P = .003 ) and 35.9 % ( P = .004 ) in the coach-led and self-directed groups , respectively , vs 14.4 % in the usual care group . Both interventions also achieved greater net improvements in waist circumference and fasting plasma glucose level . CONCLUSION Proven effective in a primary care setting , the 2 DPP-based lifestyle interventions are readily scalable and exportable with potential for substantial clinical and public health impact . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00842426 Background : Research on the translation of efficacious lifestyle change programs to prevent type 2 diabetes into community or clinical setting s is needed . Objective : The objective of this study was to examine the reach , implementation , and efficacy of a 6-month lifestyle program implemented in primary care by nurse practitioners ( NPs ) for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes . Methods : The NP sites ( n = 4 ) were r and omized to an enhanced st and ard care program ( one  NP  and one  nutrition session ) or a lifestyle program ( enhanced st and ard care and six NP sessions ) . These NPs recruited adults at risk of diabetes from their practice ( n = 58 ) , with an acceptance rate of 70 % . Results : The program reached a diverse , obese , and moderately low income sample . The NPs were able to successfully implement the protocol s. The average length of the program was 9.3 months . Attendance was high ( 98 % ) , and attrition was low ( 12 % ) . The NPs were able to adopt the educational , behavioral , and psychosocial strategies of the intervention easily . Motivational interviewing was more difficult for NPs . Mixed-model repeated- measures analysis indicated significant trends or improvement in both groups for nutrition and exercise behavior . Participants of the lifestyle program demonstrated trends for better high-density lipoprotein ( HDL ) and exercise behavior compared with the enhanced st and ard care participants . Twenty-five percent of lifestyle participants met treatment goals of 5 % weight loss compared with 11 % of st and ard care participants . Discussion : A lifestyle program can be implemented in primary care by NPs , reach the targeted population , and be modestly successful . Further research is indicated Introduction Although lifestyle interventions are effective in delaying the onset of diabetes , translating these lessons to routine health care setting s remains a challenge . We investigated the effectiveness of a theory-based , brief , small-group weight loss intervention for diabetes prevention . A secondary purpose was to determine the potential reach of the intervention . Methods A total of 14,379 members of an integrated health care organization newly diagnosed with prediabetes were potentially eligible to participate in this matched cohort longitudinal study . Of this group , 1,030 attended a 90-minute , small-group session that targeted personal action planning for healthful eating , physical activity , and weight management . We accessed electronic medical records to select 1 to 2 controls ( matched on impaired fasting glucose measurement , sex , age , and body mass index ) for each member who attended the small-group session ( n = 760 ) . Weight change , as recorded in the medical record , was the primary outcome . Mixed models analyses were used to adjust for matching variables and covariates and to account for individual r and om effects over time . Results Small-group participants  lost significantly more weight than did their matched controls . A significantly higher proportion of small-group participants  lost at least 5 % of their body weight compared with controls . Conclusion A brief , small-group weight loss intervention was effective . However , it did not reach broadly into the population that was at risk for diabetes Objective To evaluate the use and effectiveness of two “ in-home ” strategies for delivering diabetes prevention programming using cable television . Methods An individually r and omized , two-arm intervention trial including adults with diabetes risk factors living in two US cities . 
    Output:
    