human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: The YMCA ’s Diabetes Prevention Program gives you the skills you need and the support you deserve to make lasting healthy lifestyle changes . WHAT IS PREDIABETES ? Prediabetes occurs when blood sugar levels are higher than normal but not high enough for a type 2 diabetes diagnosis . Risk for developing type 2 diabetes may be reduced or eliminated by weight loss , healthier eating and increased physical activity OBJECTIVE The Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) demonstrated that weight loss from intensive lifestyle intervention ( ILI ) in adults with prediabetes could decrease progression to type 2 diabetes . Inner-city , low-income Hispanic women are at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes ; however , this type of intervention is not well established in this group . We hypothesized that a DPP intervention modified for a community health center ( CHC ) setting would decrease weight and improve metabolic measures in Hispanic women with prediabetes . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Women diagnosed with prediabetes on a screening oral glucose tolerance test were recruited from a CHC . Participants ( 90 % of whom were Hispanic ) were r and omized to either usual care ( age 43 ± 9.7 years , BMI 35.2 ± 7.3 kg/m2 ) or ILI ( age 43.8 ± 10.8 years , BMI 35.4 ± 8.5 kg/m2 ) , structured as 14 weeks of group sessions focused on food choices , behavior change , physical activity , and weight loss . One year after enrollment , 122 women repeated baseline measures . RESULTS Groups had similar baseline weight , BMI , and fasting and 2-h glucose . One year later , the ILI group had lost 3.8 kg ( 4.4 % ) , while the usual care group had gained 1.4 kg ( 1.6 % , P < 0.0001 ) . Two-hour glucose excursion decreased 15 mg/dL ( 0.85 mmol/L ) in the ILI and 1 mg/dL ( 0.07 mmol/L ) in the usual care group ( P = 0.03 ) . Significant decreases favoring the ILI group were noted in BMI , percent body fat , waist circumference , and fasting insulin . CONCLUSIONS A 14-week ILI program based on the DPP can effectively be translated into a predominantly Hispanic CHC setting , result ing in decreased weight , improved fasting insulin , and smaller glucose excursions 1 year after enrolling in the program BACKGROUND In the 2.8 years of the Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) r and omised clinical trial ,  diabetes incidence  in high-risk adults was reduced by 58 % with intensive lifestyle intervention and by 31 % with metformin , compared with placebo . We investigated the persistence of these effects in the long term . METHODS All active DPP participants were eligible for continued follow-up . 2766 of 3150 ( 88 % ) enrolled for a median additional follow-up of 5.7 years ( IQR 5.5 - 5.8 ) . 910 participants were from the lifestyle , 924 from the metformin , and 932 were from the original placebo groups .  On the basis of the benefits from the intensive lifestyle intervention in the DPP , all three groups were offered group-implemented lifestyle intervention . Metformin treatment was continued in the original metformin group ( 850 mg twice daily as tolerated ) , with participants unmasked to assignment , and the original lifestyle intervention group was offered additional lifestyle support . The primary outcome was development of diabetes according to American Diabetes Association criteria . Analysis was by intention-to-treat . This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT00038727 . FINDINGS During the 10.0-year ( IQR 9.0 - 10.5 ) follow-up since r and omisation to DPP , the original lifestyle group lost , then partly regained weight . The modest weight loss with metformin was maintained . Diabetes incidence rates during the DPP were 4.8 cases per 100 person-years ( 95 % CI 4.1 - 5.7 ) in the intensive lifestyle intervention group , 7.8 ( 6.8 - 8.8 ) in the metformin group , and 11.0 ( 9.8 - 12.3 ) in the placebo group . Diabetes incidence rates in this follow-up study were similar between treatment groups : 5.9 per 100 person-years ( 5.1 - 6.8 ) for lifestyle , 4.9 ( 4.2 - 5.7 ) for metformin , and 5.6 ( 4.8 - 6.5 ) for placebo . Diabetes incidence in the 10 years since DPP r and omisation was reduced by 34 % ( 24 - 42 ) in the lifestyle group and 18 % ( 7 - 28 ) in the metformin group compared with placebo . INTERPRETATION During follow-up after DPP , incidences in the former placebo and metformin groups fell to equal those in the former lifestyle group , but the cumulative incidence of diabetes remained lowest in the lifestyle group . Prevention or delay of diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin can persist for at least 10 years . FUNDING National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases ( NIDDK ) Background The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study ( DPS ) was a r and omized controlled trial , which showed that it is possible to prevent type 2 diabetes by lifestyle changes . The aim of the present study was to examine whether the lifestyle intervention had an effect on the ten-year mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in the DPS participants originally r and omized either into an intervention or control group . Furthermore , we compared these results with a population -based cohort comprising individuals of varying glucose tolerance states . Methods and Findings Middle-aged , overweight people with IGT ( n = 522 ) were r and omized into intensive intervention ( including physical activity , weight reduction and dietary counseling ) , or control “ mini-intervention ” group . Median length of the intervention period was 4 years and the mean follow-up was 10.6 years . The population -based reference study cohort included 1881 individuals ( 1570 with normal glucose tolerance , 183 with IGT , 59 with screen-detected type 2 diabetes , 69 with previously known type 2 diabetes ) with the mean follow-up of 13.8 years .  Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity data were collected from the national Hospital Discharge Register and Causes of Death Register . Among the DPS participants who consented for register linkage ( n = 505 ) , total mortality ( 2.2 vs. 3.8 per 1000 person years , hazard ratio HR = 0.57 , 95 % CI 0.21–1.58 ) and cardiovascular morbidity ( 22.9 vs. 22.0 per 1000 person years , HR = 1.04 , 95 % CI 0.72–1.51 ) did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups . Compared with the population -based cohort with impaired glucose tolerance , adjusted HRs were 0.21 ( 95 % CI 0.09–0.52 ) and 0.39 ( 95 % CI 0.20–0.79 ) for total mortality , and 0.89 ( 95 % CI 0.62–1.27 ) and 0.87 ( 0.60–1.27 ) for cardiovascular morbidity in the intervention and control groups of the DPS , respectively . The risk of death in DPS combined cohort was markedly lower than in FINRISK IGT cohort ( adjusted HR 0.30 , 95 % CI 0.17–0.54 ) , but there was no significant difference in the risk of CVD ( adjusted HR 0.88 , 95 % CI 0.64–1.21 ) . Conclusions Lifestyle intervention among persons with IGT did not decrease cardiovascular morbidity  during the first 10 years of follow-up . However , the statistical power may not be sufficient to detect small differences between the intervention and control groups . Low total mortality among participants of the DPS compared with individuals with IGT in the general population could be ascribed to a lower cardiovascular risk profile at baseline and regular follow-up . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Aims /hypothesisLifestyle modification helps in the primary prevention of diabetes in multiethnic American , Finnish and Chinese population s. In a prospect i ve community-based study , we tested whether the progression to diabetes could be influenced by interventions in native Asian Indians with IGT who were younger , leaner and more insulin resistant than the above population s. Methods We r and omised 531 ( 421 men 110 women ) subjects with IGT ( mean age 45.9±5.7 years , BMI 25.8±3.5 kg/m2 ) into four groups . Group 1 was the control , Group 2 was given advice on lifestyle modification ( LSM ) , Group 3 was treated with metformin ( MET ) and Group 4 was given LSM plus MET . The primary outcome measure was type 2 diabetes as diagnosed using World Health Organization criteria . Results The median follow-up period was 30 months , and the 3-year cumulative incidences of diabetes were 55.0 % , 39.3 % , 40.5 % and 39.5 % in Groups 1–4 , respectively . The relative risk reduction was 28.5 % with LSM ( 95 % CI 20.5–37.3 , p=0.018 ) , 26.4 % with MET ( 95 % CI 19.1–35.1 , p=0.029 ) and 28.2 % with LSM + MET ( 95 % CI 20.3–37.0 , p=0.022 ) , as compared with the control group . The number needed to treat to prevent one incident case of diabetes was 6.4 for LSM , 6.9 for MET and 6.5 for LSM + MET . Conclusions /interpretationProgression of IGT to diabetes is high in native Asian Indians .  Both LSM and MET significantly reduced the incidence of diabetes  in Asian Indians with IGT ; there was no added benefit from combining them Aims : To compare data on cardiovascular risk factor changes in lipids , insulin , proinsulin , fibrinolysis , leptin and C-reactive protein , and on diabetes incidence , in relation to changes in lifestyle . Methods : The study was a r and omized lifestyle intervention trial conducted in northern Sweden between 1995 and 2000 , in 168 individuals with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) and body mass index above 27 at start . The intensive intervention group ( n = 83 ) was subjected to a 1-month residential lifestyle programme . The usual care group ( n = 85 ) participated in a health examination ending with a single counselling session . Follow-up was conducted at 1 , 3 and 5 years . Results : At 1-year follow-up , an extensive cardio-metabolic risk factor reduction was demonstrated in the intensive intervention group , along with a 70 % decrease of progress to type 2 diabetes . At 5-year follow-up , most of these beneficial effects had disappeared . Reported physical activity and fibre intake as well as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were still increased , and fasting insulin and proinsulin were lower . Conclusions : The intervention affected several important cardio-metabolic risk variables beneficially , and reduced the risk for type 2 diabetes , but the effects persisted only as long as the new lifestyle was maintained . Increased physical activity seemed to be the behaviour that was most easy to preserve OBJECTIVES Prevention of type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) is a priority in healthcare , but there is a lack of evidence investigating how to effectively translate prevention research into a UK primary care setting . We assessed whether a structured education programme targeting lifestyle and behaviour change was effective at preventing progression to T2DM  in people with pre-diabetes . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Forty-four general practice s were r and omised to receive either st and ard care or a 6hour group structured education programme with an annual refresher course , and regular phone contact . Participants were followed up for 3years . The primary outcome was progression to T2DM . RESULTS Eight hundred and eighty participants were included ( 36 % female , mean age 64years , 16 % ethnic minority group ) ; 131 participants developed T2DM . There was a non-significant 26 % reduced risk of developing T2DM in the intervention arm compared to st and ard care ( HR 0.74 , 95 % CI 0.48 , 1.14 , p=0.18 ) . The reduction in T2DM risk when excluding those who did not attend the initial education session was also non-significant ( HR 0.65 , 0.41 , 1.03 , p=0.07 ) . There were statistically significant improvements in HbA1c ( -0.06 , -0.11 , -0.01 ) , LDL cholesterol ( -0.08 , -0.15 , -0.01 ) , sedentary time ( -26.29 , -45.26 , -7 
    Output:
    
agent
Small effect sizes and potentially transient effect were reported in some studies , and some review ers noted that durability of intervention impact was potentially sensitive to duration of intervention and adherence to behaviour change .
Behaviour change , vascular disease and mortality outcome data were infrequently reported , and evidence of the impact of intervention on these outcomes was minimal .
Relatively long- duration lifestyle interventions can limit or delay progression to diabetes under trial conditions .
However , outcomes from more time-limited interventions , and those applied in routine clinical setting s , appear more variable , in keeping with the findings of recent pragmatic trials .
There is little evidence of intervention impact on vascular outcomes or mortality end points in any context . '
Real-world ' implementation of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention may be expected to lead to modest outcomes
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: The YMCA ’s Diabetes Prevention Program gives you the skills you need and the support you deserve to make lasting healthy lifestyle changes . WHAT IS PREDIABETES ? Prediabetes occurs when blood sugar levels are higher than normal but not high enough for a type 2 diabetes diagnosis . Risk for developing type 2 diabetes may be reduced or eliminated by weight loss , healthier eating and increased physical activity OBJECTIVE The Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) demonstrated that weight loss from intensive lifestyle intervention ( ILI ) in adults with prediabetes could decrease progression to type 2 diabetes . Inner-city , low-income Hispanic women are at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes ; however , this type of intervention is not well established in this group . We hypothesized that a DPP intervention modified for a community health center ( CHC ) setting would decrease weight and improve metabolic measures in Hispanic women with prediabetes . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Women diagnosed with prediabetes on a screening oral glucose tolerance test were recruited from a CHC . Participants ( 90 % of whom were Hispanic ) were r and omized to either usual care ( age 43 ± 9.7 years , BMI 35.2 ± 7.3 kg/m2 ) or ILI ( age 43.8 ± 10.8 years , BMI 35.4 ± 8.5 kg/m2 ) , structured as 14 weeks of group sessions focused on food choices , behavior change , physical activity , and weight loss . One year after enrollment , 122 women repeated baseline measures . RESULTS Groups had similar baseline weight , BMI , and fasting and 2-h glucose . One year later , the ILI group had lost 3.8 kg ( 4.4 % ) , while the usual care group had gained 1.4 kg ( 1.6 % , P < 0.0001 ) . Two-hour glucose excursion decreased 15 mg/dL ( 0.85 mmol/L ) in the ILI and 1 mg/dL ( 0.07 mmol/L ) in the usual care group ( P = 0.03 ) . Significant decreases favoring the ILI group were noted in BMI , percent body fat , waist circumference , and fasting insulin . CONCLUSIONS A 14-week ILI program based on the DPP can effectively be translated into a predominantly Hispanic CHC setting , result ing in decreased weight , improved fasting insulin , and smaller glucose excursions 1 year after enrolling in the program BACKGROUND In the 2.8 years of the Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) r and omised clinical trial ,  diabetes incidence  in high-risk adults was reduced by 58 % with intensive lifestyle intervention and by 31 % with metformin , compared with placebo . We investigated the persistence of these effects in the long term . METHODS All active DPP participants were eligible for continued follow-up . 2766 of 3150 ( 88 % ) enrolled for a median additional follow-up of 5.7 years ( IQR 5.5 - 5.8 ) . 910 participants were from the lifestyle , 924 from the metformin , and 932 were from the original placebo groups .  On the basis of the benefits from the intensive lifestyle intervention in the DPP , all three groups were offered group-implemented lifestyle intervention . Metformin treatment was continued in the original metformin group ( 850 mg twice daily as tolerated ) , with participants unmasked to assignment , and the original lifestyle intervention group was offered additional lifestyle support . The primary outcome was development of diabetes according to American Diabetes Association criteria . Analysis was by intention-to-treat . This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT00038727 . FINDINGS During the 10.0-year ( IQR 9.0 - 10.5 ) follow-up since r and omisation to DPP , the original lifestyle group lost , then partly regained weight . The modest weight loss with metformin was maintained . Diabetes incidence rates during the DPP were 4.8 cases per 100 person-years ( 95 % CI 4.1 - 5.7 ) in the intensive lifestyle intervention group , 7.8 ( 6.8 - 8.8 ) in the metformin group , and 11.0 ( 9.8 - 12.3 ) in the placebo group . Diabetes incidence rates in this follow-up study were similar between treatment groups : 5.9 per 100 person-years ( 5.1 - 6.8 ) for lifestyle , 4.9 ( 4.2 - 5.7 ) for metformin , and 5.6 ( 4.8 - 6.5 ) for placebo . Diabetes incidence in the 10 years since DPP r and omisation was reduced by 34 % ( 24 - 42 ) in the lifestyle group and 18 % ( 7 - 28 ) in the metformin group compared with placebo . INTERPRETATION During follow-up after DPP , incidences in the former placebo and metformin groups fell to equal those in the former lifestyle group , but the cumulative incidence of diabetes remained lowest in the lifestyle group . Prevention or delay of diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin can persist for at least 10 years . FUNDING National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases ( NIDDK ) Background The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study ( DPS ) was a r and omized controlled trial , which showed that it is possible to prevent type 2 diabetes by lifestyle changes . The aim of the present study was to examine whether the lifestyle intervention had an effect on the ten-year mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in the DPS participants originally r and omized either into an intervention or control group . Furthermore , we compared these results with a population -based cohort comprising individuals of varying glucose tolerance states . Methods and Findings Middle-aged , overweight people with IGT ( n = 522 ) were r and omized into intensive intervention ( including physical activity , weight reduction and dietary counseling ) , or control “ mini-intervention ” group . Median length of the intervention period was 4 years and the mean follow-up was 10.6 years . The population -based reference study cohort included 1881 individuals ( 1570 with normal glucose tolerance , 183 with IGT , 59 with screen-detected type 2 diabetes , 69 with previously known type 2 diabetes ) with the mean follow-up of 13.8 years .  Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity data were collected from the national Hospital Discharge Register and Causes of Death Register . Among the DPS participants who consented for register linkage ( n = 505 ) , total mortality ( 2.2 vs. 3.8 per 1000 person years , hazard ratio HR = 0.57 , 95 % CI 0.21–1.58 ) and cardiovascular morbidity ( 22.9 vs. 22.0 per 1000 person years , HR = 1.04 , 95 % CI 0.72–1.51 ) did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups . Compared with the population -based cohort with impaired glucose tolerance , adjusted HRs were 0.21 ( 95 % CI 0.09–0.52 ) and 0.39 ( 95 % CI 0.20–0.79 ) for total mortality , and 0.89 ( 95 % CI 0.62–1.27 ) and 0.87 ( 0.60–1.27 ) for cardiovascular morbidity in the intervention and control groups of the DPS , respectively . The risk of death in DPS combined cohort was markedly lower than in FINRISK IGT cohort ( adjusted HR 0.30 , 95 % CI 0.17–0.54 ) , but there was no significant difference in the risk of CVD ( adjusted HR 0.88 , 95 % CI 0.64–1.21 ) . Conclusions Lifestyle intervention among persons with IGT did not decrease cardiovascular morbidity  during the first 10 years of follow-up . However , the statistical power may not be sufficient to detect small differences between the intervention and control groups . Low total mortality among participants of the DPS compared with individuals with IGT in the general population could be ascribed to a lower cardiovascular risk profile at baseline and regular follow-up . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Aims /hypothesisLifestyle modification helps in the primary prevention of diabetes in multiethnic American , Finnish and Chinese population s. In a prospect i ve community-based study , we tested whether the progression to diabetes could be influenced by interventions in native Asian Indians with IGT who were younger , leaner and more insulin resistant than the above population s. Methods We r and omised 531 ( 421 men 110 women ) subjects with IGT ( mean age 45.9±5.7 years , BMI 25.8±3.5 kg/m2 ) into four groups . Group 1 was the control , Group 2 was given advice on lifestyle modification ( LSM ) , Group 3 was treated with metformin ( MET ) and Group 4 was given LSM plus MET . The primary outcome measure was type 2 diabetes as diagnosed using World Health Organization criteria . Results The median follow-up period was 30 months , and the 3-year cumulative incidences of diabetes were 55.0 % , 39.3 % , 40.5 % and 39.5 % in Groups 1–4 , respectively . The relative risk reduction was 28.5 % with LSM ( 95 % CI 20.5–37.3 , p=0.018 ) , 26.4 % with MET ( 95 % CI 19.1–35.1 , p=0.029 ) and 28.2 % with LSM + MET ( 95 % CI 20.3–37.0 , p=0.022 ) , as compared with the control group . The number needed to treat to prevent one incident case of diabetes was 6.4 for LSM , 6.9 for MET and 6.5 for LSM + MET . Conclusions /interpretationProgression of IGT to diabetes is high in native Asian Indians .  Both LSM and MET significantly reduced the incidence of diabetes  in Asian Indians with IGT ; there was no added benefit from combining them Aims : To compare data on cardiovascular risk factor changes in lipids , insulin , proinsulin , fibrinolysis , leptin and C-reactive protein , and on diabetes incidence , in relation to changes in lifestyle . Methods : The study was a r and omized lifestyle intervention trial conducted in northern Sweden between 1995 and 2000 , in 168 individuals with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) and body mass index above 27 at start . The intensive intervention group ( n = 83 ) was subjected to a 1-month residential lifestyle programme . The usual care group ( n = 85 ) participated in a health examination ending with a single counselling session . Follow-up was conducted at 1 , 3 and 5 years . Results : At 1-year follow-up , an extensive cardio-metabolic risk factor reduction was demonstrated in the intensive intervention group , along with a 70 % decrease of progress to type 2 diabetes . At 5-year follow-up , most of these beneficial effects had disappeared . Reported physical activity and fibre intake as well as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were still increased , and fasting insulin and proinsulin were lower . Conclusions : The intervention affected several important cardio-metabolic risk variables beneficially , and reduced the risk for type 2 diabetes , but the effects persisted only as long as the new lifestyle was maintained . Increased physical activity seemed to be the behaviour that was most easy to preserve OBJECTIVES Prevention of type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) is a priority in healthcare , but there is a lack of evidence investigating how to effectively translate prevention research into a UK primary care setting . We assessed whether a structured education programme targeting lifestyle and behaviour change was effective at preventing progression to T2DM  in people with pre-diabetes . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Forty-four general practice s were r and omised to receive either st and ard care or a 6hour group structured education programme with an annual refresher course , and regular phone contact . Participants were followed up for 3years . The primary outcome was progression to T2DM . RESULTS Eight hundred and eighty participants were included ( 36 % female , mean age 64years , 16 % ethnic minority group ) ; 131 participants developed T2DM . There was a non-significant 26 % reduced risk of developing T2DM in the intervention arm compared to st and ard care ( HR 0.74 , 95 % CI 0.48 , 1.14 , p=0.18 ) . The reduction in T2DM risk when excluding those who did not attend the initial education session was also non-significant ( HR 0.65 , 0.41 , 1.03 , p=0.07 ) . There were statistically significant improvements in HbA1c ( -0.06 , -0.11 , -0.01 ) , LDL cholesterol ( -0.08 , -0.15 , -0.01 ) , sedentary time ( -26.29 , -45.26 , -7 
    Output:
    