human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Eighty-seven morbidly obese patients were prospect ively r and omized to two operations : gastric bypass was performed on 42 and gastric partition on 45 . Gastric bypass proved to be more effective ; gastric bypass patients lost 15 % more of their original weight at 12 months and 21 % more at 18 months . There were no failures in the gastric bypass group ; 28 of the 45 operations failed in the gastric partition group . An additional 60 patients underwent gastric bypass since the completion of the study . In the total series of 147 patients who underwent gastric bypass or gastric partition  , there was no mortality , and the surgical complication rate was 12 % . Because the gastric pouches and the anastomoses were similar in the two operations , the superiority of the gastric bypass may well be due to a heretofore unexplained effect of distal gastric and duodenal exclusion The present status of 38 patients comprising a clinical trial of jejunoileal and gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity , begun four years ago at North Carolina Memorial Hospital , is reported . Weight loss was greater in patients treated by jejunoileal bypass  than those treated by gastric bypass .  The poorer weight loss noted in the  gastric bypass patients is associated with an excessively large proximal gastric pouch , which had characterized the 19  gastric bypass operations done prior to May 1977 . The weight loss achieved with the current version of the gastric bypass , a smaller proximal gastric pouch , is comparable to that achieved with jejunoileal bypass . The objective and subjective sequelae and complications of jejunoileal bypass are more common and more serious than those of gastric bypass . Gastric bypass is the better operation for the treatment of morbid obesity Background : Laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ing ( LAGB ) and open vertical b and ed gastroplasty ( VBG ) are treatment modalities for morbid obesity . However , few prospect i ve r and omized clinical trials ( RCT ) have been performed to compare both operations . Methods : 100 patients ( 50 per group ) were included in the study . Postoperative outcomes included hospital length of stay ( LOS ) , complications , percent excess weight loss ( % EWL ) , BMI and reduction in total comorbidities . Follow-up in all patients was 2 years . Results : LOS was significantly shorter in the LAGB group . 3 LAGB were converted to open ( 1 to gastric bypass ) . Directly after VBG , 3 patients needed relaparotomies due to leakage , of which one ( 2 % ) died . After 2 years , 100 % follow-up was achieved . BMI and % EWL were significantly decreased in both groups but significantly more in the VBG group compared to the LAGB group ( 31.0 kg/m2 and 70.1 % vs 34.6 and 54.9 % respectively ) . Co-morbidities significantly decreased in both groups in time . 2 years after LAGB , 20 patients needed reoperation for pouch dilation/slippage ( n=12 ) , b and leakage ( n=2 ) , b and erosion ( n=2 ) and access-port problems ( n=4 ) . In the VBG group , 18 patients needed revisional surgery due to staple-line disruption ( n=15 ) , narrow outlet ( n=2 ) or insufficient weight loss ( n=1 ) . Furthermore , 8 VBG patients developed an incisional hernia . Conclusion : This RCT demonstrates that , despite the initial better weight loss in the  VBG group , based on complication rates and clinical outcome , LAGB is preferred . It had a shorter LOS and less postoperative morbidity A prospect i ve r and omized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the effects of  gastric bypass with Roux-en-Y gastro-jejunostomy and a gastric partitioning procedure .  Operative groups were comparable , with regard to preoperative weight , age , sex , historic findings and operative complications . Postoperative weight loss was followed for one year . Patients receiving the gastric partitioning procedure  showed significantly poorer weight loss as early as three months postoperatively than did those receiving gastric bypass .  This poorer performance persisted throughout the study period Background : Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective treatment in morbidly obese patients , leading to durable weight loss . Objective : In this prospect i ve double blind study , we aim to evaluate and compare the effects of  laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass ( LRYGBP ) with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ( LSG )  on body weight , appetite , fasting , and postpr and ial ghrelin and peptide-YY ( PYY ) levels . Methods : After r and omization , 16 patients were assigned to LRYGBP and 16 patients to LSG .  Patients were reevaluated on the 1st , 3rd , 6th , and 12th postoperative month . Blood sample s were collected after an overnight fast and in 6 patients in each group after a st and ard 420 kcal mixed meal . Results : Body weight and body mass index ( BMI ) decreased markedly ( P < 0.0001 ) and comparably after either procedure . Excess weight loss was greater after LSG at 6 months ( 55.5 % ± 7.6 % vs. 50.2 % ± 6.5 % , P = 0.04 ) and 12 months ( 69.7 % ± 14.6 % vs. 60.5 % ± 10.7 % , [ P = 0.05 ] ) . After LRYGBP fasting ghrelin levels did not change significantly compared with baseline ( P = 0.19 ) and did not decrease significantly after the test meal . On the other h and , LSG was followed by a marked reduction in fasting ghrelin levels ( P < 0.0001 ) and a significant suppression after the meal . Fasting PYY levels increased after either surgical procedure ( P ≤ 0.001 ) . Appetite decreased in both groups but to a greater extend after LSG . Conclusion : PYY levels increased similarly after either procedure . The markedly reduced ghrelin levels in addition to increased PYY levels after LSG , are associated with greater appetite suppression and excess weight loss compared with LRYGBP Context Observational studies have shown sustained weight loss after surgery for extreme obesity . No r and omized trial of contemporary surgical methods has been performed . Contribution The authors r and omly assigned 80 mildly to moderately obese ( body mass index , 30 to 35 kg/m2 ) adults to laparoscopic placement of an adjustable gastric b and or to an intensive nonsurgical weight loss program . After 2 years , the surgical group had lost 21.6 % of initial weight , and the nonsurgical group had lost 5.5 % of initial weight . Four patients required laparoscopic revision of the gastric b and . Caution s The study was not design ed to detect uncommon adverse events . Implication s Laparoscopic gastric b and ing is effective treatment for mild to moderate obesity . The Editors The development of a safe and effective treatment for obesity is a leading challenge in health care today . Obesity is an increasing health problem across the world with a prevalence of more than 20 % among the adult population in Western countries and more than 30 % in the United States ( 1 , 2 ) . The increasing prevalence is associated with a parallel increase of several obesity-related diseases , in particular , the diseases of the metabolic syndrome ( 3 , 4 ) , which include type 2 diabetes , hypertension , and dyslipidemia , and are linked to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis , obstructive sleep apnea , and the polycystic ovary syndrome . For obese individuals , the options are limited . Behavioral therapies of reduced energy intake , improved eating practice s , and increased exercise and activity , supplemented by pharmacotherapy , generally achieve only modest and often transient effects ( 5 , 6 ) . Observational studies have shown that bariatric surgical therapies involving gastric restriction by various forms of stapling with or without diversion of the gut to generate malabsorption of food are effective in achieving major weight loss and clinical ly significant improvements in health and quality of life ( 7 - 11 ) . Strong direct evidence from r and omized , controlled trials of the relative benefits of nonsurgical and surgical therapies is lacking . We are aware of only a single study , performed in the 1980s , in which 60 morbidly obese patients were r and omly assigned , without informed consent , to diet plus an early form of gastric stapling or to diet alone ( 12 ) . The maximum weight losses did not differ between the groups . However , the weight regain was greater in the diet-only group . The advent of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and has provided a new bariatric surgical option , which has proved to be safe , minimally invasive in its application , gentle in its use through its adjustability and easy reversibility , and similarly effective to the other bariatric procedures ( 10 , 13 , 14 ) . Figure 1 shows the LAP-B AND System ( INAMED Health , Santa Barbara , California ) and demonstrates the key feature of adjustability of the area within the b and through which it induces satiety ( 15 ) . Patients require no more than an overnight hospital stay , and the procedure has been shown to be markedly safer than gastric bypass surgery ( 13 ) . Figure 1 . The laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ( LAP-B AND System , INAMED Health , Santa Barbara , California ) with no added fluid ( top ) and with 2 mL of fluid added ( bottom ) . We hypothesized that surgical therapy would induce more weight loss , health benefit , and improvement in quality of life than nonsurgical therapy and have conducted a r and omized , controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of current nonsurgical therapy with laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ing in a group of mildly to moderately obese adults ( body mass index , 30 kg/m2 to 35 kg/m2 ) . We did not study patients with a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2 because current observational data suggest that outcomes after nonsurgical treatment were unlikely to be equal to those after surgical care for these patients . The principal outcome measures were weight change , health , quality of life , and complications of therapy . Methods Patient Recruitment We recruited patients for the study through a newspaper advertisement . All patient assessment s and outpatient treatments were conducted at a community clinic dedicated to obesity management or in the clinics of a university department of surgery . Surgical procedures were conducted at a private community hospital experienced in the care of bariatric surgical patients . Patients in both groups did not pay any medical costs generated by the study . The human ethics committees of The Alfred Hospital and The Avenue Hospital approved the study in accordance with the guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council ( www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e35syn.htm ) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 , as revised in 2000 ( www.wma.net/e/ethicsunit/pdf/draft_historical_contemporary_perspectives.pdf ) . Inclusion Criteria We considered patients to be eligible if they were between 20 and 50 years of age ; had a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 to 35 kg/m2 ; had identifiable problems , including an obesity-related comorbid condition ( such as hypertension , dyslipidemia , diabetes , obstructive sleep apnea , or gastroesophageal reflux disease ) , severe physical limitations , or clinical ly significant psychosocial problems associated with their obesity ; had attempted to reduce weight over at least the previous 5 years ; could underst and the options offered and the r and omization process ; and were willing to comply with the requirements of each program . Exclusion Criteria We excluded c and i date s with a history of bariatric surgery or medical problems that contraindicated treatment in either study group , such as impaired mental status , drug or alcohol addiction , or portal hypertension . In addition , we excluded participants if they had undergone an intensive , physician-supervised program that used very-low-calorie diets or pharmacotherapy or if they did not attend the 2 initial patient information visits . Assessment We provided detailed information about the problems of obesity and about the 2 study groups through at least 2 discussion periods and a patient information booklet . Initial assessment included anthropometric measures ; identification of medical , physical , or psychosocial problems ( both weight-related and other ) ; and a discussion of previous weight loss efforts . The assessment included a detailed dietary history by the trial dietitian and a review by a specialist physician to determine the presence and severity of associated medical conditions . Initial investigations included measurements of fasting blood glucose level ; serum insulin level ; and a lipid profile , including HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels . After initial assessment , we instituted a program of advice on appropriate eating patterns and exercise and followed each patient on a monthly basis for 3 months . During this time , we assessed the patients ' fulfillment of tasks , such as completion of a food diary , and overall adherence to appointments . R and omization Process We r and omly allocated eligible patients to receive a conventional , intensive , nonsurgical program or laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ing .  A computer-derived r and om allocation sequence , without blocking or stratification , performed the r and omization . This was prepared at the trial office . The trial coordinator enrolled participants and informed them of the trial allocation . After assessment had confirmed a participant 's suitability for r and omization , the coordinator contacted the trial office by telephone for allocation . The study was not blinded . Description of Nonsurgical and Surgical Interventions Common Program We instructed and encouraged all patients to follow appropriate lifestyle behavior of good 
    Output:
    
agent
Bariatric surgery appears efficacious compared to st and ard care in reducing BMI .
Weight losses are greatest with diversionary procedures , intermediate with diversionary/restrictive procedures , and lowest with those that are purely restrictive .
Compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass , adjustable gastric b and ing has lower weight loss efficacy , but also leads to fewer serious adverse effects
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Eighty-seven morbidly obese patients were prospect ively r and omized to two operations : gastric bypass was performed on 42 and gastric partition on 45 . Gastric bypass proved to be more effective ; gastric bypass patients lost 15 % more of their original weight at 12 months and 21 % more at 18 months . There were no failures in the gastric bypass group ; 28 of the 45 operations failed in the gastric partition group . An additional 60 patients underwent gastric bypass since the completion of the study . In the total series of 147 patients who underwent gastric bypass or gastric partition  , there was no mortality , and the surgical complication rate was 12 % . Because the gastric pouches and the anastomoses were similar in the two operations , the superiority of the gastric bypass may well be due to a heretofore unexplained effect of distal gastric and duodenal exclusion The present status of 38 patients comprising a clinical trial of jejunoileal and gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity , begun four years ago at North Carolina Memorial Hospital , is reported . Weight loss was greater in patients treated by jejunoileal bypass  than those treated by gastric bypass .  The poorer weight loss noted in the  gastric bypass patients is associated with an excessively large proximal gastric pouch , which had characterized the 19  gastric bypass operations done prior to May 1977 . The weight loss achieved with the current version of the gastric bypass , a smaller proximal gastric pouch , is comparable to that achieved with jejunoileal bypass . The objective and subjective sequelae and complications of jejunoileal bypass are more common and more serious than those of gastric bypass . Gastric bypass is the better operation for the treatment of morbid obesity Background : Laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ing ( LAGB ) and open vertical b and ed gastroplasty ( VBG ) are treatment modalities for morbid obesity . However , few prospect i ve r and omized clinical trials ( RCT ) have been performed to compare both operations . Methods : 100 patients ( 50 per group ) were included in the study . Postoperative outcomes included hospital length of stay ( LOS ) , complications , percent excess weight loss ( % EWL ) , BMI and reduction in total comorbidities . Follow-up in all patients was 2 years . Results : LOS was significantly shorter in the LAGB group . 3 LAGB were converted to open ( 1 to gastric bypass ) . Directly after VBG , 3 patients needed relaparotomies due to leakage , of which one ( 2 % ) died . After 2 years , 100 % follow-up was achieved . BMI and % EWL were significantly decreased in both groups but significantly more in the VBG group compared to the LAGB group ( 31.0 kg/m2 and 70.1 % vs 34.6 and 54.9 % respectively ) . Co-morbidities significantly decreased in both groups in time . 2 years after LAGB , 20 patients needed reoperation for pouch dilation/slippage ( n=12 ) , b and leakage ( n=2 ) , b and erosion ( n=2 ) and access-port problems ( n=4 ) . In the VBG group , 18 patients needed revisional surgery due to staple-line disruption ( n=15 ) , narrow outlet ( n=2 ) or insufficient weight loss ( n=1 ) . Furthermore , 8 VBG patients developed an incisional hernia . Conclusion : This RCT demonstrates that , despite the initial better weight loss in the  VBG group , based on complication rates and clinical outcome , LAGB is preferred . It had a shorter LOS and less postoperative morbidity A prospect i ve r and omized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the effects of  gastric bypass with Roux-en-Y gastro-jejunostomy and a gastric partitioning procedure .  Operative groups were comparable , with regard to preoperative weight , age , sex , historic findings and operative complications . Postoperative weight loss was followed for one year . Patients receiving the gastric partitioning procedure  showed significantly poorer weight loss as early as three months postoperatively than did those receiving gastric bypass .  This poorer performance persisted throughout the study period Background : Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective treatment in morbidly obese patients , leading to durable weight loss . Objective : In this prospect i ve double blind study , we aim to evaluate and compare the effects of  laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass ( LRYGBP ) with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ( LSG )  on body weight , appetite , fasting , and postpr and ial ghrelin and peptide-YY ( PYY ) levels . Methods : After r and omization , 16 patients were assigned to LRYGBP and 16 patients to LSG .  Patients were reevaluated on the 1st , 3rd , 6th , and 12th postoperative month . Blood sample s were collected after an overnight fast and in 6 patients in each group after a st and ard 420 kcal mixed meal . Results : Body weight and body mass index ( BMI ) decreased markedly ( P < 0.0001 ) and comparably after either procedure . Excess weight loss was greater after LSG at 6 months ( 55.5 % ± 7.6 % vs. 50.2 % ± 6.5 % , P = 0.04 ) and 12 months ( 69.7 % ± 14.6 % vs. 60.5 % ± 10.7 % , [ P = 0.05 ] ) . After LRYGBP fasting ghrelin levels did not change significantly compared with baseline ( P = 0.19 ) and did not decrease significantly after the test meal . On the other h and , LSG was followed by a marked reduction in fasting ghrelin levels ( P < 0.0001 ) and a significant suppression after the meal . Fasting PYY levels increased after either surgical procedure ( P ≤ 0.001 ) . Appetite decreased in both groups but to a greater extend after LSG . Conclusion : PYY levels increased similarly after either procedure . The markedly reduced ghrelin levels in addition to increased PYY levels after LSG , are associated with greater appetite suppression and excess weight loss compared with LRYGBP Context Observational studies have shown sustained weight loss after surgery for extreme obesity . No r and omized trial of contemporary surgical methods has been performed . Contribution The authors r and omly assigned 80 mildly to moderately obese ( body mass index , 30 to 35 kg/m2 ) adults to laparoscopic placement of an adjustable gastric b and or to an intensive nonsurgical weight loss program . After 2 years , the surgical group had lost 21.6 % of initial weight , and the nonsurgical group had lost 5.5 % of initial weight . Four patients required laparoscopic revision of the gastric b and . Caution s The study was not design ed to detect uncommon adverse events . Implication s Laparoscopic gastric b and ing is effective treatment for mild to moderate obesity . The Editors The development of a safe and effective treatment for obesity is a leading challenge in health care today . Obesity is an increasing health problem across the world with a prevalence of more than 20 % among the adult population in Western countries and more than 30 % in the United States ( 1 , 2 ) . The increasing prevalence is associated with a parallel increase of several obesity-related diseases , in particular , the diseases of the metabolic syndrome ( 3 , 4 ) , which include type 2 diabetes , hypertension , and dyslipidemia , and are linked to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis , obstructive sleep apnea , and the polycystic ovary syndrome . For obese individuals , the options are limited . Behavioral therapies of reduced energy intake , improved eating practice s , and increased exercise and activity , supplemented by pharmacotherapy , generally achieve only modest and often transient effects ( 5 , 6 ) . Observational studies have shown that bariatric surgical therapies involving gastric restriction by various forms of stapling with or without diversion of the gut to generate malabsorption of food are effective in achieving major weight loss and clinical ly significant improvements in health and quality of life ( 7 - 11 ) . Strong direct evidence from r and omized , controlled trials of the relative benefits of nonsurgical and surgical therapies is lacking . We are aware of only a single study , performed in the 1980s , in which 60 morbidly obese patients were r and omly assigned , without informed consent , to diet plus an early form of gastric stapling or to diet alone ( 12 ) . The maximum weight losses did not differ between the groups . However , the weight regain was greater in the diet-only group . The advent of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and has provided a new bariatric surgical option , which has proved to be safe , minimally invasive in its application , gentle in its use through its adjustability and easy reversibility , and similarly effective to the other bariatric procedures ( 10 , 13 , 14 ) . Figure 1 shows the LAP-B AND System ( INAMED Health , Santa Barbara , California ) and demonstrates the key feature of adjustability of the area within the b and through which it induces satiety ( 15 ) . Patients require no more than an overnight hospital stay , and the procedure has been shown to be markedly safer than gastric bypass surgery ( 13 ) . Figure 1 . The laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ( LAP-B AND System , INAMED Health , Santa Barbara , California ) with no added fluid ( top ) and with 2 mL of fluid added ( bottom ) . We hypothesized that surgical therapy would induce more weight loss , health benefit , and improvement in quality of life than nonsurgical therapy and have conducted a r and omized , controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of current nonsurgical therapy with laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ing in a group of mildly to moderately obese adults ( body mass index , 30 kg/m2 to 35 kg/m2 ) . We did not study patients with a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2 because current observational data suggest that outcomes after nonsurgical treatment were unlikely to be equal to those after surgical care for these patients . The principal outcome measures were weight change , health , quality of life , and complications of therapy . Methods Patient Recruitment We recruited patients for the study through a newspaper advertisement . All patient assessment s and outpatient treatments were conducted at a community clinic dedicated to obesity management or in the clinics of a university department of surgery . Surgical procedures were conducted at a private community hospital experienced in the care of bariatric surgical patients . Patients in both groups did not pay any medical costs generated by the study . The human ethics committees of The Alfred Hospital and The Avenue Hospital approved the study in accordance with the guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council ( www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e35syn.htm ) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 , as revised in 2000 ( www.wma.net/e/ethicsunit/pdf/draft_historical_contemporary_perspectives.pdf ) . Inclusion Criteria We considered patients to be eligible if they were between 20 and 50 years of age ; had a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 to 35 kg/m2 ; had identifiable problems , including an obesity-related comorbid condition ( such as hypertension , dyslipidemia , diabetes , obstructive sleep apnea , or gastroesophageal reflux disease ) , severe physical limitations , or clinical ly significant psychosocial problems associated with their obesity ; had attempted to reduce weight over at least the previous 5 years ; could underst and the options offered and the r and omization process ; and were willing to comply with the requirements of each program . Exclusion Criteria We excluded c and i date s with a history of bariatric surgery or medical problems that contraindicated treatment in either study group , such as impaired mental status , drug or alcohol addiction , or portal hypertension . In addition , we excluded participants if they had undergone an intensive , physician-supervised program that used very-low-calorie diets or pharmacotherapy or if they did not attend the 2 initial patient information visits . Assessment We provided detailed information about the problems of obesity and about the 2 study groups through at least 2 discussion periods and a patient information booklet . Initial assessment included anthropometric measures ; identification of medical , physical , or psychosocial problems ( both weight-related and other ) ; and a discussion of previous weight loss efforts . The assessment included a detailed dietary history by the trial dietitian and a review by a specialist physician to determine the presence and severity of associated medical conditions . Initial investigations included measurements of fasting blood glucose level ; serum insulin level ; and a lipid profile , including HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels . After initial assessment , we instituted a program of advice on appropriate eating patterns and exercise and followed each patient on a monthly basis for 3 months . During this time , we assessed the patients ' fulfillment of tasks , such as completion of a food diary , and overall adherence to appointments . R and omization Process We r and omly allocated eligible patients to receive a conventional , intensive , nonsurgical program or laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ing .  A computer-derived r and om allocation sequence , without blocking or stratification , performed the r and omization . This was prepared at the trial office . The trial coordinator enrolled participants and informed them of the trial allocation . After assessment had confirmed a participant 's suitability for r and omization , the coordinator contacted the trial office by telephone for allocation . The study was not blinded . Description of Nonsurgical and Surgical Interventions Common Program We instructed and encouraged all patients to follow appropriate lifestyle behavior of good 
    Output:
    