human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: The effect of pharmaceutical care on the prevention , detection , and resolution of medication-related problems in high-risk patients in a rural community was studied . Adult patients who received care at clinics in a medically underserved area of Alabama and who were identified as being at high risk of medication-related adverse events were r and omly assigned to a control group or an intervention group . The control group received st and ard medical care , and the intervention group received pharmaceutical care , including a medical record review , a medication history review , pharmacotherapeutic evaluation , and patient medication education and monitoring over a one-year period .  A total of 69 patients completed the study ( 33 in the intervention group and 36 in the control group ) . The percentage of patients responding to hypertension , diabetes , dyslipidemia , and anticoagulation therapy increased significantly in the intervention group and declined in the control group . Ratings for inappropriate prescribing improved in all 10 domains evaluated in the intervention group but worsened in 5 domains in the control group . There were no significant differences between the groups at 12 months in health-related quality of life or medication misadventures . Medication compliance scores improved in the intervention group but not in the control group . Medication knowledge increased in the intervention group and decreased in the control group . Pharmaceutical care in a rural , community-based setting appeared to reduce inappropriate prescribing , enhance disease management , and improve medication compliance and knowledge without adversely affecting health-related quality of life BACKGROUND Pharmacists have been shown to positively impact the outcomes of care for treatment of many different kinds of disease states . In particular , pharmacist-run lipid clinics have enjoyed varying degrees of success , depending on the outcome assessed . At our hospital , when a patient is transferred to the pharmacist-coordinated lipid clinic , the primary care pharmacist is responsible for ordering and interpreting labs and prescribing and monitoring lipid-altering therapy . OBJECTIVE This study was design ed to assess if there is a statistically significant difference between the magnitude of serum cholesterol reduction for patients receiving lipid-altering pharmacotherapy  when clinical ly trained pharmacists are actively prescribing and adjusting the drug therapy compared to other health care practitioners ( usual care ) . METHODS Patient records from the hospital computer data bases were retrospectively and r and omly selected for analysis . Following evaluation for inclusion s and exclusions , 41 patient records remained for statistical analysis for the cohort group , and 47 records remained from the group of patients managed by a clinical pharmacist . RESULTS Management of dyslipidemia by a clinical pharmacist was associated with a significant reduction in overall mean low-density lipoprotein ( LDL , 18.5 % ) compared to the cohort that did not have a clinical pharmacist as the primary manager of dyslipidemia ( 6.5 % , P=0.049 ) . This suggests improved clinical outcomes , defined as greater LDL reduction , when clinical pharmacists participate in lipid management , including drug prescribing . The magnitude reduction in LDL was found to be related to the number of clinical pharmacy visits ( 11.4 % for 1 visit , 23.2 % for 2 visits , and 23.7 % for > 3 visits ) , compared to the usual care group ( -11.0 % , 18.0 % , and 7.4 % ; statistically significant , P=0.038 , for > 3 visits only ) . These results occurred even though the group of dyslipidemic patients managed primarily by a clinical pharmacist contained a statistically greater number of patients with 2 or more risk factors and high-density lipoprotein ( HDL ) levels less than 40 mg/dL. CONCLUSION Interdisciplinary medical teams that include clinical pharmacists who are actively prescribing and adjusting lipid drug therapy may achieve greater reductions in LDL for patients who have been assessed with multiple risk factors compared to patients managed without clinical pharmacists . Active participation by clinical pharmacists in lipid management for patients with elevated LDL result ed in improved treatment success as measured by the magnitude reduction in LDL . The reduction in LDL was between 5 % and 22 % per visit greater for patients being treated by clinical pharmacists versus usual care , even in a patient population with more risk factors . These intermediate outcomes may translate into long-term outcomes in fewer cardiovascular events , improved quality of life for patients with dyslipidemia , and lower costs associated with sequelae of dyslipidemias OBJECTIVES To identify patients at risk for coronary artery disease ( CAD ) through a search of a community pharmacy 's prescription data base , to screen and identify patients with elevated cholesterol and at risk for CAD , to enroll patients in a pharmacist-directed lipid management program , and to evaluate selected clinical and humanistic outcomes . DESIGN R and omized , pretest-posttest control groups . SETTING Independent community pharmacy in a suburban metropolitan area . PATIENTS 51 patients who were not at National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) or defined triglyceride goals and who met inclusion criteria . INTERVENTION Pharmacist-directed lipid management program . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical outcome measures included total cholesterol , LDL-C , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( HDL-C ) , and triglyceride levels ; achievement of LDL-C goal ; and risk factor prediction scores . Humanistic outcome measures included patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care and patient knowledge of hyperlipidemia . RESULTS LDL-C was decreased in the pharmacist intervention group ( n = 25 ) , compared with an increase in the control group at study end . HDL-C levels increased and triglyceride levels decreased in both groups . Of treatment group patients , 32 % achieved their cholesterol goals , compared with 15 % of control group patients . Risk factor prediction scores improved in the treatment group and worsened in the control group . The treatment group 's hyperlipidemia knowledge scores improved significantly from pretest to posttest . Both treatment and control group patient satisfaction scores for the pharmacist investigator were favorable at study end . CONCLUSION Both treatment and control patients benefited from participating in this study . Patients enrolled in the lipid management program made greater improvements in their knowledge of hyperlipidemia , risk factor scores , and cholesterol levels CONTEXT Poor medication adherence diminishes the health benefits of pharmacotherapies . Elderly patients with coronary risk factors frequently require treatment with multiple medications , placing them at increased risk for nonadherence . OBJECTIVE To test the efficacy of a comprehensive pharmacy care program to improve medication adherence and its associated effects on blood pressure ( BP ) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PATIENTS A multiphase , prospect i ve study with an observational phase and a r and omized controlled trial conducted at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center of 200 community-based patients aged 65 years or older taking at least 4 chronic medications . The study was conducted from June 2004 to August 2006 . INTERVENTION After a 2-month run-in phase ( measurement of baseline adherence , BP , and LDL-C ) , patients entered a 6-month intervention phase ( st and ardized medication education , regular follow-up by pharmacists , and medications dispensed in time-specific packs ) . Following the intervention phase , patients were r and omized to continued pharmacy care vs usual care for an additional 6 months . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary end point of the observation phase was change in the proportion of pills taken vs baseline ; secondary end points were the associated changes in BP and LDL-C. Primary end point of the r and omization phase was the between-group comparison of medication persistence . RESULTS A total of 200 elderly patients ( 77.1 % men ; mean [ SD ] age , 78 [ 8.3 ] years ) , taking a mean ( SD ) of 9 ( 3 ) chronic medications were enrolled . Coronary risk factors included drug-treated hypertension in 184 patients ( 91.5 % ) and drug-treated hyperlipidemia in 162 ( 80.6 % ) . Mean ( SD ) baseline medication adherence was 61.2 % ( 13.5 % ) . After 6 months of intervention , medication adherence increased to 96.9 % ( 5.2 % ; P<.001 ) and was associated with significant improvements in systolic BP ( 133.2 [ 14.9 ] to 129.9 [ 16.0 ] mm Hg ; P = .02 ) and LDL-C ( 91.7 [ 26.1 ] to 86.8 [ 23.4 ] mg/dL ; P = .001 ) . Six months after r and omization , the persistence of medication adherence decreased to 69.1 % ( 16.4 % ) among those patients assigned to usual care , whereas it was sustained at 95.5 % ( 7.7 % ) in pharmacy care ( P<.001 ) . This was associated with significant reductions in systolic BP in the pharmacy care group ( -6.9 mm Hg ; 95 % CI , -10.7 to -3.1 mm Hg ) vs the usual care group ( -1.0 mm Hg ; 95 % CI , -5.9 to 3.9 mm Hg ; P = .04 ) , but no significant between-group differences in LDL-C levels or reductions . CONCLUSIONS A pharmacy care program led to increases in medication adherence , medication persistence , and clinical ly meaningful reductions in BP , whereas discontinuation of the program was associated with decreased medication adherence and persistence . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : OBJECTIVE : To implement and evaluate pharmaceutical care services for patients with hyperlipidemias in the community pharmacy setting , to evaluate the results of a pharmaceutical care training process for pharmacists by using an assessment quiz , and to measure patient outcomes result ing from provision of pharmaceutical care to patients with hyperlipidemia . DESIGN : A prospect i ve study was conducted over a 1 -year period . Patients served as their own controls . SETTING : Two independent community pharmacies in Richmond , Virginia . PARTICIPANTS : Twenty-five adult patients with confirmed dyslipidemias completed the study . INTERVENTIONS : Study pharmacists assessed each patient and assisted in setting therapeutic goals ; patients also completed a visit with a registered dietitian . Drug therapy recommendations were made to physicians by the pharmacist when appropriate . Follow-up was scheduled with the pharmacist to ensure positive outcomes and reduce adverse effects . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : Fasting lipoprotein profiles were measured initially and at 6 and 12 months . The SF-36 survey , the MacKeigan-Larson satisfaction survey , and a patient opinion survey were administered initially and at the conclusion of the study . RESULTS : Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values were significantly decreased at 12 months compared with either the baseline or 6-month values ( p < 0.02 ) . Significant improvement was found in several domains of the surveys ; quality of life , patient satisfaction with pharmacy services , and patient opinions on the role of the pharmacist improved after the intervention . CONCLUSIONS : Pharmaceutical care may positively affect lipid values , quality of life , and patient satisfaction BACKGROUND Despite clear evidence for the efficacy of lowering cholesterol levels , there is a deficiency in its real-world application . There is a need to explore alternative strategies to address this important public health problem . This study aim ed to determine the effect of a program of community pharmacist intervention on the process of cholesterol risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events . METHODS A r and omized controlled trial conducted in 54 community pharmacies ( 1998 - 2000 ) included patients at high risk for cardiovascular events ( with atherosclerotic disease or diabetes mellitus with another risk factor ) . Patients r and omized to pharmacist intervention received education and a brochure on risk factors , point-of-care cholesterol measurement , referral to their physician , and regular follow-up for 16 weeks . Pharmacists faxed a simple form to the primary care physician identifying risk factors and any suggestions . Usual care patients received the same brochure and general advice only , with minimal follow-up . The primary end point was a composite of performance of a fasting cholesterol panel by the physician or addition or increase in dose of cholesterol-lowering medication . RESULTS The external monitoring committee recommended early study termination owing to benefit . Of the 675 patients enrolled , approximately 40 % were women , and the average age was 64 years . The primary end point was reached in 57 % of intervention patients vs 31 % in usual care ( odds ratio , 3.0 ; 95 % confidence interval , 2.2 - 4.1 ; P<.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS A community-based intervention program improved the process of cholesterol management in high-risk patients . This program demonstrates the value of community pharmacists working in collaboration with patients and physicians We conducted a prospect i ve trial to determine whether a formal , integrated pharmaceutical care plan can enhance patient acceptance and compliance with colestipol therapy and improve outcomes .  Forty patients with hypercholesterolemia were equally divided and assigned to either a usual care or pharmaceutical care group . In the pharmaceutical care group compared with the usual care group , after 52 weeks , colestipol therapy result ed in a greater reduction in total cholesterol ( 12.5 % vs 7.3 % ) , low-density lipoprotein 
    Output:
    
agent
A clinical ly relevant but not statistically significant reduction in triglycerides was found .
No impact on HDL-C levels was found .
Patients ' adherence to pharmacotherapeutic regimens and quality of life were considered possibly not sensitive and possibly sensitive to pharmacist interventions , respectively .
Total cholesterol is sensitive to pharmacist interventions , while LDL-C and triglyceride levels are possibly sensitive to those interventions .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: The effect of pharmaceutical care on the prevention , detection , and resolution of medication-related problems in high-risk patients in a rural community was studied . Adult patients who received care at clinics in a medically underserved area of Alabama and who were identified as being at high risk of medication-related adverse events were r and omly assigned to a control group or an intervention group . The control group received st and ard medical care , and the intervention group received pharmaceutical care , including a medical record review , a medication history review , pharmacotherapeutic evaluation , and patient medication education and monitoring over a one-year period .  A total of 69 patients completed the study ( 33 in the intervention group and 36 in the control group ) . The percentage of patients responding to hypertension , diabetes , dyslipidemia , and anticoagulation therapy increased significantly in the intervention group and declined in the control group . Ratings for inappropriate prescribing improved in all 10 domains evaluated in the intervention group but worsened in 5 domains in the control group . There were no significant differences between the groups at 12 months in health-related quality of life or medication misadventures . Medication compliance scores improved in the intervention group but not in the control group . Medication knowledge increased in the intervention group and decreased in the control group . Pharmaceutical care in a rural , community-based setting appeared to reduce inappropriate prescribing , enhance disease management , and improve medication compliance and knowledge without adversely affecting health-related quality of life BACKGROUND Pharmacists have been shown to positively impact the outcomes of care for treatment of many different kinds of disease states . In particular , pharmacist-run lipid clinics have enjoyed varying degrees of success , depending on the outcome assessed . At our hospital , when a patient is transferred to the pharmacist-coordinated lipid clinic , the primary care pharmacist is responsible for ordering and interpreting labs and prescribing and monitoring lipid-altering therapy . OBJECTIVE This study was design ed to assess if there is a statistically significant difference between the magnitude of serum cholesterol reduction for patients receiving lipid-altering pharmacotherapy  when clinical ly trained pharmacists are actively prescribing and adjusting the drug therapy compared to other health care practitioners ( usual care ) . METHODS Patient records from the hospital computer data bases were retrospectively and r and omly selected for analysis . Following evaluation for inclusion s and exclusions , 41 patient records remained for statistical analysis for the cohort group , and 47 records remained from the group of patients managed by a clinical pharmacist . RESULTS Management of dyslipidemia by a clinical pharmacist was associated with a significant reduction in overall mean low-density lipoprotein ( LDL , 18.5 % ) compared to the cohort that did not have a clinical pharmacist as the primary manager of dyslipidemia ( 6.5 % , P=0.049 ) . This suggests improved clinical outcomes , defined as greater LDL reduction , when clinical pharmacists participate in lipid management , including drug prescribing . The magnitude reduction in LDL was found to be related to the number of clinical pharmacy visits ( 11.4 % for 1 visit , 23.2 % for 2 visits , and 23.7 % for > 3 visits ) , compared to the usual care group ( -11.0 % , 18.0 % , and 7.4 % ; statistically significant , P=0.038 , for > 3 visits only ) . These results occurred even though the group of dyslipidemic patients managed primarily by a clinical pharmacist contained a statistically greater number of patients with 2 or more risk factors and high-density lipoprotein ( HDL ) levels less than 40 mg/dL. CONCLUSION Interdisciplinary medical teams that include clinical pharmacists who are actively prescribing and adjusting lipid drug therapy may achieve greater reductions in LDL for patients who have been assessed with multiple risk factors compared to patients managed without clinical pharmacists . Active participation by clinical pharmacists in lipid management for patients with elevated LDL result ed in improved treatment success as measured by the magnitude reduction in LDL . The reduction in LDL was between 5 % and 22 % per visit greater for patients being treated by clinical pharmacists versus usual care , even in a patient population with more risk factors . These intermediate outcomes may translate into long-term outcomes in fewer cardiovascular events , improved quality of life for patients with dyslipidemia , and lower costs associated with sequelae of dyslipidemias OBJECTIVES To identify patients at risk for coronary artery disease ( CAD ) through a search of a community pharmacy 's prescription data base , to screen and identify patients with elevated cholesterol and at risk for CAD , to enroll patients in a pharmacist-directed lipid management program , and to evaluate selected clinical and humanistic outcomes . DESIGN R and omized , pretest-posttest control groups . SETTING Independent community pharmacy in a suburban metropolitan area . PATIENTS 51 patients who were not at National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) or defined triglyceride goals and who met inclusion criteria . INTERVENTION Pharmacist-directed lipid management program . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical outcome measures included total cholesterol , LDL-C , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( HDL-C ) , and triglyceride levels ; achievement of LDL-C goal ; and risk factor prediction scores . Humanistic outcome measures included patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care and patient knowledge of hyperlipidemia . RESULTS LDL-C was decreased in the pharmacist intervention group ( n = 25 ) , compared with an increase in the control group at study end . HDL-C levels increased and triglyceride levels decreased in both groups . Of treatment group patients , 32 % achieved their cholesterol goals , compared with 15 % of control group patients . Risk factor prediction scores improved in the treatment group and worsened in the control group . The treatment group 's hyperlipidemia knowledge scores improved significantly from pretest to posttest . Both treatment and control group patient satisfaction scores for the pharmacist investigator were favorable at study end . CONCLUSION Both treatment and control patients benefited from participating in this study . Patients enrolled in the lipid management program made greater improvements in their knowledge of hyperlipidemia , risk factor scores , and cholesterol levels CONTEXT Poor medication adherence diminishes the health benefits of pharmacotherapies . Elderly patients with coronary risk factors frequently require treatment with multiple medications , placing them at increased risk for nonadherence . OBJECTIVE To test the efficacy of a comprehensive pharmacy care program to improve medication adherence and its associated effects on blood pressure ( BP ) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PATIENTS A multiphase , prospect i ve study with an observational phase and a r and omized controlled trial conducted at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center of 200 community-based patients aged 65 years or older taking at least 4 chronic medications . The study was conducted from June 2004 to August 2006 . INTERVENTION After a 2-month run-in phase ( measurement of baseline adherence , BP , and LDL-C ) , patients entered a 6-month intervention phase ( st and ardized medication education , regular follow-up by pharmacists , and medications dispensed in time-specific packs ) . Following the intervention phase , patients were r and omized to continued pharmacy care vs usual care for an additional 6 months . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary end point of the observation phase was change in the proportion of pills taken vs baseline ; secondary end points were the associated changes in BP and LDL-C. Primary end point of the r and omization phase was the between-group comparison of medication persistence . RESULTS A total of 200 elderly patients ( 77.1 % men ; mean [ SD ] age , 78 [ 8.3 ] years ) , taking a mean ( SD ) of 9 ( 3 ) chronic medications were enrolled . Coronary risk factors included drug-treated hypertension in 184 patients ( 91.5 % ) and drug-treated hyperlipidemia in 162 ( 80.6 % ) . Mean ( SD ) baseline medication adherence was 61.2 % ( 13.5 % ) . After 6 months of intervention , medication adherence increased to 96.9 % ( 5.2 % ; P<.001 ) and was associated with significant improvements in systolic BP ( 133.2 [ 14.9 ] to 129.9 [ 16.0 ] mm Hg ; P = .02 ) and LDL-C ( 91.7 [ 26.1 ] to 86.8 [ 23.4 ] mg/dL ; P = .001 ) . Six months after r and omization , the persistence of medication adherence decreased to 69.1 % ( 16.4 % ) among those patients assigned to usual care , whereas it was sustained at 95.5 % ( 7.7 % ) in pharmacy care ( P<.001 ) . This was associated with significant reductions in systolic BP in the pharmacy care group ( -6.9 mm Hg ; 95 % CI , -10.7 to -3.1 mm Hg ) vs the usual care group ( -1.0 mm Hg ; 95 % CI , -5.9 to 3.9 mm Hg ; P = .04 ) , but no significant between-group differences in LDL-C levels or reductions . CONCLUSIONS A pharmacy care program led to increases in medication adherence , medication persistence , and clinical ly meaningful reductions in BP , whereas discontinuation of the program was associated with decreased medication adherence and persistence . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : OBJECTIVE : To implement and evaluate pharmaceutical care services for patients with hyperlipidemias in the community pharmacy setting , to evaluate the results of a pharmaceutical care training process for pharmacists by using an assessment quiz , and to measure patient outcomes result ing from provision of pharmaceutical care to patients with hyperlipidemia . DESIGN : A prospect i ve study was conducted over a 1 -year period . Patients served as their own controls . SETTING : Two independent community pharmacies in Richmond , Virginia . PARTICIPANTS : Twenty-five adult patients with confirmed dyslipidemias completed the study . INTERVENTIONS : Study pharmacists assessed each patient and assisted in setting therapeutic goals ; patients also completed a visit with a registered dietitian . Drug therapy recommendations were made to physicians by the pharmacist when appropriate . Follow-up was scheduled with the pharmacist to ensure positive outcomes and reduce adverse effects . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : Fasting lipoprotein profiles were measured initially and at 6 and 12 months . The SF-36 survey , the MacKeigan-Larson satisfaction survey , and a patient opinion survey were administered initially and at the conclusion of the study . RESULTS : Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values were significantly decreased at 12 months compared with either the baseline or 6-month values ( p < 0.02 ) . Significant improvement was found in several domains of the surveys ; quality of life , patient satisfaction with pharmacy services , and patient opinions on the role of the pharmacist improved after the intervention . CONCLUSIONS : Pharmaceutical care may positively affect lipid values , quality of life , and patient satisfaction BACKGROUND Despite clear evidence for the efficacy of lowering cholesterol levels , there is a deficiency in its real-world application . There is a need to explore alternative strategies to address this important public health problem . This study aim ed to determine the effect of a program of community pharmacist intervention on the process of cholesterol risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events . METHODS A r and omized controlled trial conducted in 54 community pharmacies ( 1998 - 2000 ) included patients at high risk for cardiovascular events ( with atherosclerotic disease or diabetes mellitus with another risk factor ) . Patients r and omized to pharmacist intervention received education and a brochure on risk factors , point-of-care cholesterol measurement , referral to their physician , and regular follow-up for 16 weeks . Pharmacists faxed a simple form to the primary care physician identifying risk factors and any suggestions . Usual care patients received the same brochure and general advice only , with minimal follow-up . The primary end point was a composite of performance of a fasting cholesterol panel by the physician or addition or increase in dose of cholesterol-lowering medication . RESULTS The external monitoring committee recommended early study termination owing to benefit . Of the 675 patients enrolled , approximately 40 % were women , and the average age was 64 years . The primary end point was reached in 57 % of intervention patients vs 31 % in usual care ( odds ratio , 3.0 ; 95 % confidence interval , 2.2 - 4.1 ; P<.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS A community-based intervention program improved the process of cholesterol management in high-risk patients . This program demonstrates the value of community pharmacists working in collaboration with patients and physicians We conducted a prospect i ve trial to determine whether a formal , integrated pharmaceutical care plan can enhance patient acceptance and compliance with colestipol therapy and improve outcomes .  Forty patients with hypercholesterolemia were equally divided and assigned to either a usual care or pharmaceutical care group . In the pharmaceutical care group compared with the usual care group , after 52 weeks , colestipol therapy result ed in a greater reduction in total cholesterol ( 12.5 % vs 7.3 % ) , low-density lipoprotein 
    Output:
    