human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background Neurocognitive testing has been endorsed as a “ cornerstone ’ of concussion management by recent Vienna and Prague meetings of the Concussion in Sport Group . Neurocognitive testing is important given the potential unreliability of athlete self-report after injury . Relying only on athletes'ormalities after injury . Study Design Case control study ; Level of evidence , 3 . Methods High school and college athletes with a diagnosed concussion were tested 2 days after injury . Postinjury neurocognitive performance ( Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing ) and symptom ( postconcussion symptom ) scores were compared with preinjury ( baseline ) scores and with those of an agex and education-matched noninjured athlete control group . “ Abnormal ” test performance was determined statistically with Reliable Change Index scores . Results Sixty-four percent of concussed athletes reported a significant increase in symptoms , as judged by postconcussion symptom scores , compared with preinjury baseline at 2 days after injury . Eighty-three percent of the concussed sample demonstrated significantly poorer neurocognitive test results relative to their own baseline performance . The addition of neurocognitive testing result ed in a net increase in sensitivity of 19 % . Ninety-three percent of the sample had either abnormal neurocognitive test results or a significant increase in symptoms , relative to their own baseline ; 30 % of a control group demonstrated either abnormalities in neurocognitive testing or elevated symptoms , as judged by postconcussion symptom scores . For the concussed group , use of symptom and neurocognitive test results result ed in an increased yield of 29 % overreliance on symptoms alone . In contrast , 0 % of the control group had both symptoms and abnormal neurocognitive testing . Conclusion Reliance on patients ’ self-reported symptoms after concussion is likely to result in underdiagnosis of concussion and may result in premature return to play . Neurocognitive testing increases diagnostic accuracy when used in conjunction with self-reported symptoms This study explored the diagnostic utility of the composite scores of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing ( ImPACT ) and Post Concussion Symptom Scale scores ( PCSS ) . Recently concussed high school athletes ( N=72 ) were tested within 72 h of sustaining a concussion , and data were compared to non-concussed high school athletes with no history of concussion ( N=66 ) . Between-groups MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate effect of concussion on test performance ( p<.001 ) ; univariate ANOVAS revealed all six measures contributed to the between-groups differences . A discriminant function analyses was conducted to measure the ability of the five ImPACT composite scores , as well as the PCSS to classify concussion status . One discriminant function was identified that consisted of the Visual Memory , Processing Speed , and Impulse Control composite scores PCSS , which correctly classified 85.5 % of the cases . Approximately 82 % of participants in the concussion group and 89 % of participants in the control group were correctly classified . Using these data , the sensitivity of ImPACT was 81.9 % , and the specificity was 89.4 % . As part of a formal concussion management program , ImPACT is a useful tool for the assessment of the neurocognitive and neurobehavioral sequelae of concussion , and can also provide post-injury cognitive and symptom data that can assist a practitioner in making safer return to play decisions Computerized neurocognitive assessment tools ( NCATs ) are increasingly used for baseline and post-concussion assessment s. To date , NCATs have not demonstrated strong test-retest reliabilities . Most studies have used non-military population s and different method ologies , complicating the determination of the utility of NCATs in military population s. The test-retest reliability of four NCATs ( Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics 4 [ ANAM4 ]  ,  CNS-Vital Signs , CogState  , and Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test [ ImPACT ] ) was investigated in a healthy active duty military sample . Four hundred and nineteen Service Members were r and omly assigned to take one NCAT and 215 returned after approximately 30 days for retest . Participants deemed to have inadequate effort during one or both testing sessions , according to the NCATs scoring algorithms , were removed from analyses . Each NCAT had at least one reliability score ( intraclass correlation ) in the " adequate " range ( .70-.79 ) , only ImPACT had one score considered " high " ( .80-.89 ) , and no scores met " very high " criteria ( .90-.99 ) . However , overall test-retest reliabilities in four NCATs in a military sample are consistent with reliabilities reported in the literature and are lower than desired for clinical decision-making Objectives This study aim ed to develop and vali date prognostic criteria to identify children at risk for persistence of mild traumatic brain injury ( MTBI ) impairment . Methods A prospect i ve cohort study was conducted among 11- to 17-year-old emergency department ( ED ) patients admitted for MTBI . The Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing neurocognitive test was administered during hospitalization and at routine clinic follow-up ( ImPACT © ) . Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic ( ROC ) analyses were used to develop prognostic criteria for MTBI-related impairment in 1 group and vali date the criteria in a second group . Mild traumatic brain injury – related impairment was defined as any impairment ( symptom score > 8 or < 25th percentile on at least 1 of 4 neurocognitive composite domains ) or severe impairment ( symptom score > 12 or < 25th percentile on at least 2 of 4 neurocognitive composite domains ) present on follow-up . Results The derivation and validation cohorts were 42 and 21 patients ( median age , 14 years ; 71.4 % male ) . Using the mean of the validation cohort patients ’ 4 neurocognitive deficit composite percentiles at baseline , a cut point of less than 39 percentile had high sensitivity ( 0.89 ) and specificity ( 0.80 ) and an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 in predicting the presence of any impairment at follow-up ; it discriminated equally well in the validation cohort . A cut point of less than 27 percentile had good sensitivity ( 0.67 ) and specificity ( 0.67 ) and area under the ROC curve of 0.67 in predicting the presence of severe impairment in the derivation cohort at follow-up ; it discriminated equally well in the validation cohort . Conclusions This is the first study demonstrating prognostic criteria that may greatly help physicians identify patients who would benefit from structured follow-up care after MTBI OBJECTIVE : The purpose of this study was to compare concussion rates and recovery times for athletes wearing newer helmet technology compared to traditional helmet design . METHODS : This was a three-year , prospect i ve , naturalistic , cohort study . Participants were 2,141 high school athletes from Western Pennsylvania . Approximately half of the sample wore the Revolution helmet manufactured by Riddell , Inc.  ( n = 1,173 ) and the remainder of the sample used  st and ard helmets ( n = 968 ) . Athletes underwent computerized neurocognitive testing through the use of ImPACT at the beginning of the study . Following a concussion , players were reevaluated at various time intervals until recovery was complete . RESULTS : In the total sample , the concussion rate in athletes wearing the Revolution was 5.3 % and in athletes wearing st and ard helmets was 7.6 % [ & khgr;2 ( 1 , 2 , 141 ) = 4.96 , P < 0.027 ] . The relative risk estimate was 0.69 ( 95 % confidence interval = 0.499– 0.958 ) . Wearing the Revolution helmet was associated with approximately a 31 % decreased relative risk and 2.3 % decreased absolute risk for sustaining a concussion in this cohort study . The athletes wearing the Revolution did not differ from athletes wearing st and ard helmets on the mechanism of injury ( e.g. , head-to-head strike ) , on-field concussion markers ( e.g. , amnesia or loss of consciousness ) , or on-field presentation of symptoms ( e.g. , headaches , dizziness , or balance problems ) . CONCLUSION : Recent sophisticated laboratory research has better eluci date d injury biomechanics associated with concussion in professional football players . This data has led to changes in helmet design and new helmet technology , which appears to have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cerebral concussion in high school football players Context With increasing knowledge and research about concussion , there have been few objective studies that have used neuropsychological domain scores and postural stability to assess concussion . Objective To evaluate the recovery curve of athletes who incur sport-related concussion from repeated serial testing of neuropsychological and posturography testing . Design A prospect i ve epidemiological model was used for the course of the study . Setting Division I intercollegiate athletics . Participants Athletes participating in football , soccer , basketball , softball , and cheerleading . Main Outcome Measures  Neuropsychological scores and posturography measures  were obtained preseason and serially at day 1 , day 2 , day 3 , and day 10 postconcussion .  Control participants  were tested at the same intervals .  Neuropsychological scores were converted to st and ards score and then into domains of attention , learning , speed of information processing , concentration , memory , and verbal fluency . Analysis of covariance with the baseline test as the covariate was used to analyze the data with univariate post hoc tests performed . Results Significant group differences were found for self reported symptoms ( P = 0.001 ) , speed of information processing ( P = 0.005 ) , mean stability ( P = 0.002 ) , and vestibular function ( P = 0.003 ) between injured and control participants . A group , by day , planned comparison found that speed of information processing and composite balance measures demonstrated significant differences through day 10 postinjury , while symptoms and the vestibular ratio remained significant only through day 3 . Conclusions The concussion recovery curve demonstrated short-term neuropsychological and posturography deficits following injury . A comprehensive approach to concussion management should be used to assess the injury and make return-to-play decisions OBJECTIVE Neuropsychological ( NP ) testing has been used for several years as a way of detecting the effects of sport-related concussion in order to aid in return-to-play determinations . In addition to st and ard pencil- and -paper tests , computerized NP tests are being commercially marketed for this purpose to professional , collegiate , high school , and elementary school programs . However , a number of important questions regarding the clinical validity and utility of these tests remain unanswered , and these questions present serious challenges to the applicability of NP testing for the management of sport-related concussion . Our purpose is to outline the criteria that should be met in order to establish the utility of NP instruments as a tool in the management of sport-related concussion and to review the degree to which existing tests have met these criteria . DATA SOURCES A comprehensive literature review of MEDLINE and PsychLit from 1990 to 2004 , including all prospect i ve , controlled studies of NP testing in sport-related concussion . DATA SYNTHESIS The effects of concussion on NP test performance are so subtle even during the acute phase of injury ( 1 - 3 days postinjury ) that they often fail to reach statistical significance in group studies . Thus , this method may lack utility in individual decision making because of a lack of sensitivity . In addition , most of these tests fail to meet other psychometric criteria ( eg , adequate reliability ) necessary for this purpose . Finally , it is unclear that NP testing can detect impairment in players once concussion-related symptoms ( eg , headache ) have resolved . Because no current guideline for the management of sport-related concussion allows a symptomatic player to return to sport , the incremental utility of NP testing remains question able . CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS Despite the theoretic rationale for the use of NP testing in the management of sport-related concussion , no NP tests have met the necessary criteria to support a clinical application at this time . Additional research is necessary to establish the utility of these tests before they can be considered part of a routine st and ard of care , and concussion recovery should be monitored via the st and ard clinical examination and subjective symptom checklists until NP testing or other methods are proven effective for this purpose OBJECTIVES To prospect ively examine the relationship of sport-related concussion with depression and neurocognitive performance and symptoms among male and female high school and college athletes . A secondary objective was to explore age and sex differences . DESIGN Pretest , multiple posttest , repeated- measures design . SETTING Laboratory . PARTICIPANTS High school and collegiate athletes ( N=75 ) with a diagnosed concussion . INTERVENTIONS Not applicable . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES  Beck Depression Inventory-II and computerized neurocognitive test battery ( Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test )  , which includes concussion symptoms ( Post-concussion Symptom Scale ) at baseline and at 2 , 7 , and 14 days postinjury . RESULTS Concussed athletes exhibited significantly higher levels of depression from baseline at 2 days ( P≤.001 ) , 7 days ( P=.006 ) , and 14 days postconcussion ( P=.04 ) . Collegiate athletes demonstrated a significant increase in depression at 14 days postconcussion than did high school athletes ( P=.03 ) . There were no sex differences in depression levels . Neurocognitive decrements at 14 
    Output:
    
agent
Although the convergent validity of ImPACT was supported , evidence of discriminant and predictive validity , diagnostic accuracy and responsiveness was inconclusive .
The review found many factors influenced the validity and utility of ImPACT scores .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background Neurocognitive testing has been endorsed as a “ cornerstone ’ of concussion management by recent Vienna and Prague meetings of the Concussion in Sport Group . Neurocognitive testing is important given the potential unreliability of athlete self-report after injury . Relying only on athletes'ormalities after injury . Study Design Case control study ; Level of evidence , 3 . Methods High school and college athletes with a diagnosed concussion were tested 2 days after injury . Postinjury neurocognitive performance ( Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing ) and symptom ( postconcussion symptom ) scores were compared with preinjury ( baseline ) scores and with those of an agex and education-matched noninjured athlete control group . “ Abnormal ” test performance was determined statistically with Reliable Change Index scores . Results Sixty-four percent of concussed athletes reported a significant increase in symptoms , as judged by postconcussion symptom scores , compared with preinjury baseline at 2 days after injury . Eighty-three percent of the concussed sample demonstrated significantly poorer neurocognitive test results relative to their own baseline performance . The addition of neurocognitive testing result ed in a net increase in sensitivity of 19 % . Ninety-three percent of the sample had either abnormal neurocognitive test results or a significant increase in symptoms , relative to their own baseline ; 30 % of a control group demonstrated either abnormalities in neurocognitive testing or elevated symptoms , as judged by postconcussion symptom scores . For the concussed group , use of symptom and neurocognitive test results result ed in an increased yield of 29 % overreliance on symptoms alone . In contrast , 0 % of the control group had both symptoms and abnormal neurocognitive testing . Conclusion Reliance on patients ’ self-reported symptoms after concussion is likely to result in underdiagnosis of concussion and may result in premature return to play . Neurocognitive testing increases diagnostic accuracy when used in conjunction with self-reported symptoms This study explored the diagnostic utility of the composite scores of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing ( ImPACT ) and Post Concussion Symptom Scale scores ( PCSS ) . Recently concussed high school athletes ( N=72 ) were tested within 72 h of sustaining a concussion , and data were compared to non-concussed high school athletes with no history of concussion ( N=66 ) . Between-groups MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate effect of concussion on test performance ( p<.001 ) ; univariate ANOVAS revealed all six measures contributed to the between-groups differences . A discriminant function analyses was conducted to measure the ability of the five ImPACT composite scores , as well as the PCSS to classify concussion status . One discriminant function was identified that consisted of the Visual Memory , Processing Speed , and Impulse Control composite scores PCSS , which correctly classified 85.5 % of the cases . Approximately 82 % of participants in the concussion group and 89 % of participants in the control group were correctly classified . Using these data , the sensitivity of ImPACT was 81.9 % , and the specificity was 89.4 % . As part of a formal concussion management program , ImPACT is a useful tool for the assessment of the neurocognitive and neurobehavioral sequelae of concussion , and can also provide post-injury cognitive and symptom data that can assist a practitioner in making safer return to play decisions Computerized neurocognitive assessment tools ( NCATs ) are increasingly used for baseline and post-concussion assessment s. To date , NCATs have not demonstrated strong test-retest reliabilities . Most studies have used non-military population s and different method ologies , complicating the determination of the utility of NCATs in military population s. The test-retest reliability of four NCATs ( Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics 4 [ ANAM4 ]  ,  CNS-Vital Signs , CogState  , and Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test [ ImPACT ] ) was investigated in a healthy active duty military sample . Four hundred and nineteen Service Members were r and omly assigned to take one NCAT and 215 returned after approximately 30 days for retest . Participants deemed to have inadequate effort during one or both testing sessions , according to the NCATs scoring algorithms , were removed from analyses . Each NCAT had at least one reliability score ( intraclass correlation ) in the " adequate " range ( .70-.79 ) , only ImPACT had one score considered " high " ( .80-.89 ) , and no scores met " very high " criteria ( .90-.99 ) . However , overall test-retest reliabilities in four NCATs in a military sample are consistent with reliabilities reported in the literature and are lower than desired for clinical decision-making Objectives This study aim ed to develop and vali date prognostic criteria to identify children at risk for persistence of mild traumatic brain injury ( MTBI ) impairment . Methods A prospect i ve cohort study was conducted among 11- to 17-year-old emergency department ( ED ) patients admitted for MTBI . The Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing neurocognitive test was administered during hospitalization and at routine clinic follow-up ( ImPACT © ) . Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic ( ROC ) analyses were used to develop prognostic criteria for MTBI-related impairment in 1 group and vali date the criteria in a second group . Mild traumatic brain injury – related impairment was defined as any impairment ( symptom score > 8 or < 25th percentile on at least 1 of 4 neurocognitive composite domains ) or severe impairment ( symptom score > 12 or < 25th percentile on at least 2 of 4 neurocognitive composite domains ) present on follow-up . Results The derivation and validation cohorts were 42 and 21 patients ( median age , 14 years ; 71.4 % male ) . Using the mean of the validation cohort patients ’ 4 neurocognitive deficit composite percentiles at baseline , a cut point of less than 39 percentile had high sensitivity ( 0.89 ) and specificity ( 0.80 ) and an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 in predicting the presence of any impairment at follow-up ; it discriminated equally well in the validation cohort . A cut point of less than 27 percentile had good sensitivity ( 0.67 ) and specificity ( 0.67 ) and area under the ROC curve of 0.67 in predicting the presence of severe impairment in the derivation cohort at follow-up ; it discriminated equally well in the validation cohort . Conclusions This is the first study demonstrating prognostic criteria that may greatly help physicians identify patients who would benefit from structured follow-up care after MTBI OBJECTIVE : The purpose of this study was to compare concussion rates and recovery times for athletes wearing newer helmet technology compared to traditional helmet design . METHODS : This was a three-year , prospect i ve , naturalistic , cohort study . Participants were 2,141 high school athletes from Western Pennsylvania . Approximately half of the sample wore the Revolution helmet manufactured by Riddell , Inc.  ( n = 1,173 ) and the remainder of the sample used  st and ard helmets ( n = 968 ) . Athletes underwent computerized neurocognitive testing through the use of ImPACT at the beginning of the study . Following a concussion , players were reevaluated at various time intervals until recovery was complete . RESULTS : In the total sample , the concussion rate in athletes wearing the Revolution was 5.3 % and in athletes wearing st and ard helmets was 7.6 % [ & khgr;2 ( 1 , 2 , 141 ) = 4.96 , P < 0.027 ] . The relative risk estimate was 0.69 ( 95 % confidence interval = 0.499– 0.958 ) . Wearing the Revolution helmet was associated with approximately a 31 % decreased relative risk and 2.3 % decreased absolute risk for sustaining a concussion in this cohort study . The athletes wearing the Revolution did not differ from athletes wearing st and ard helmets on the mechanism of injury ( e.g. , head-to-head strike ) , on-field concussion markers ( e.g. , amnesia or loss of consciousness ) , or on-field presentation of symptoms ( e.g. , headaches , dizziness , or balance problems ) . CONCLUSION : Recent sophisticated laboratory research has better eluci date d injury biomechanics associated with concussion in professional football players . This data has led to changes in helmet design and new helmet technology , which appears to have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cerebral concussion in high school football players Context With increasing knowledge and research about concussion , there have been few objective studies that have used neuropsychological domain scores and postural stability to assess concussion . Objective To evaluate the recovery curve of athletes who incur sport-related concussion from repeated serial testing of neuropsychological and posturography testing . Design A prospect i ve epidemiological model was used for the course of the study . Setting Division I intercollegiate athletics . Participants Athletes participating in football , soccer , basketball , softball , and cheerleading . Main Outcome Measures  Neuropsychological scores and posturography measures  were obtained preseason and serially at day 1 , day 2 , day 3 , and day 10 postconcussion .  Control participants  were tested at the same intervals .  Neuropsychological scores were converted to st and ards score and then into domains of attention , learning , speed of information processing , concentration , memory , and verbal fluency . Analysis of covariance with the baseline test as the covariate was used to analyze the data with univariate post hoc tests performed . Results Significant group differences were found for self reported symptoms ( P = 0.001 ) , speed of information processing ( P = 0.005 ) , mean stability ( P = 0.002 ) , and vestibular function ( P = 0.003 ) between injured and control participants . A group , by day , planned comparison found that speed of information processing and composite balance measures demonstrated significant differences through day 10 postinjury , while symptoms and the vestibular ratio remained significant only through day 3 . Conclusions The concussion recovery curve demonstrated short-term neuropsychological and posturography deficits following injury . A comprehensive approach to concussion management should be used to assess the injury and make return-to-play decisions OBJECTIVE Neuropsychological ( NP ) testing has been used for several years as a way of detecting the effects of sport-related concussion in order to aid in return-to-play determinations . In addition to st and ard pencil- and -paper tests , computerized NP tests are being commercially marketed for this purpose to professional , collegiate , high school , and elementary school programs . However , a number of important questions regarding the clinical validity and utility of these tests remain unanswered , and these questions present serious challenges to the applicability of NP testing for the management of sport-related concussion . Our purpose is to outline the criteria that should be met in order to establish the utility of NP instruments as a tool in the management of sport-related concussion and to review the degree to which existing tests have met these criteria . DATA SOURCES A comprehensive literature review of MEDLINE and PsychLit from 1990 to 2004 , including all prospect i ve , controlled studies of NP testing in sport-related concussion . DATA SYNTHESIS The effects of concussion on NP test performance are so subtle even during the acute phase of injury ( 1 - 3 days postinjury ) that they often fail to reach statistical significance in group studies . Thus , this method may lack utility in individual decision making because of a lack of sensitivity . In addition , most of these tests fail to meet other psychometric criteria ( eg , adequate reliability ) necessary for this purpose . Finally , it is unclear that NP testing can detect impairment in players once concussion-related symptoms ( eg , headache ) have resolved . Because no current guideline for the management of sport-related concussion allows a symptomatic player to return to sport , the incremental utility of NP testing remains question able . CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS Despite the theoretic rationale for the use of NP testing in the management of sport-related concussion , no NP tests have met the necessary criteria to support a clinical application at this time . Additional research is necessary to establish the utility of these tests before they can be considered part of a routine st and ard of care , and concussion recovery should be monitored via the st and ard clinical examination and subjective symptom checklists until NP testing or other methods are proven effective for this purpose OBJECTIVES To prospect ively examine the relationship of sport-related concussion with depression and neurocognitive performance and symptoms among male and female high school and college athletes . A secondary objective was to explore age and sex differences . DESIGN Pretest , multiple posttest , repeated- measures design . SETTING Laboratory . PARTICIPANTS High school and collegiate athletes ( N=75 ) with a diagnosed concussion . INTERVENTIONS Not applicable . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES  Beck Depression Inventory-II and computerized neurocognitive test battery ( Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test )  , which includes concussion symptoms ( Post-concussion Symptom Scale ) at baseline and at 2 , 7 , and 14 days postinjury . RESULTS Concussed athletes exhibited significantly higher levels of depression from baseline at 2 days ( P≤.001 ) , 7 days ( P=.006 ) , and 14 days postconcussion ( P=.04 ) . Collegiate athletes demonstrated a significant increase in depression at 14 days postconcussion than did high school athletes ( P=.03 ) . There were no sex differences in depression levels . Neurocognitive decrements at 14 
    Output:
    