human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: UNLABELLED We assessed the efficacy of dronabinol ( Marinol capsules ; Solvay Pharmaceuticals , Brussels , Belgium ) , a synthetic Delta(9)-THC ( tetrahydrocannabinol ) , in 30 patients taking opioids for chronic pain to determine its potential analgesic effects as an adjuvant treatment . Phase I of this 2-phase study was a r and omized , single-dose , double-blinded , placebo-controlled , crossover trial in which subjects were r and omly administered either 10 mg or 20 mg of dronabinol or identical placebo capsules over the course of three , 8-hour visits . Baseline self-report measures , hourly ratings of pain intensity , pain relief , pain bothersomeness , treatment satisfaction , mood , side effects , and blood serum levels were obtained . Phase II was an extended open-label titrated trial of dronabinol as add-on medication to patients on stable doses of opioids . Results of the Phase I study showed that patients who received dronabinol experienced decreased pain intensity and increased satisfaction compared with placebo . No differences in benefit were found between the 20 mg and 10 mg doses . In the Phase II trial , titrated dronabinol contributed to significant relief of pain , reduced pain bothersomeness , and increased satisfaction compared with baseline . The incidence of side effects was dose-related . Overall , the use of dronabinol was found to result in additional analgesia among patients taking opioids for chronic noncancer pain . PERSPECTIVE This study examines the effect of adding a cannabinoid to the regimen of patients with chronic pain who report significant pain despite taking stable doses of opioids . The results of our preliminary study suggest that dronabinol , a synthetic THC , may have an additive effect on pain relief Abstract Objective To evaluate the effect of the oral synthetic δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol dronabinol on central neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis . Design R and omised double blind placebo controlled crossovertrial . Setting Outpatient clinic , University Hospital of Aarhus , Denmark . Participants 24 patients aged between 23 and 55 years with multiple sclerosis and central pain . Intervention Orally administered dronabinol at a maximum doseof 10 mg daily or corresponding placebo for three weeks ( 15 - 21days ) , separated by a three week washout period . Main outcome measure Median spontaneous pain intensity ( numericalrating scale ) in the last week of treatment . Results Median spontaneous pain intensity was significantlylower during dronabinol treatment than during placebo treatment(4.0 ( 25th to 75th centiles 2.3 to 6.0 ) v 5.0 ( 4.0 to 6.4),P = 0.02 ) , and median pain relief score ( numerical rating scale)was higher ( 3.0 ( 0 to 6.7 ) v > 0 ( 0 to 2.3 ) , P = 0.035 ) . Thenumber needed to treat for 50 % pain relief was 3.5 ( 95 % confidenceinterval 1.9 to 24.8 ) . On the SF-36 quality of life scale , thetwo items bodily pain and mental health indicated benefits fromactive treatment compared with placebo . The number of patients with adverse events was higher during active treatment , especiallyin the first week of treatment . The functional ability of themultiple sclerosis patients did not change . Conclusions Dronabinol has a modest but clinical ly relevantanalgesic effect on central pain in patients with multiple sclerosis . Adverse events , including dizziness , were more frequent withdronabinol than with placebo during the first week of treatment The objective was to determine whether a cannabis-based medicinal extract ( CBME ) benefits a range of symptoms due to multiple sclerosis ( MS ) . A parallel group , double-blind , r and omized , placebo-controlled study was undertaken in three centres , recruiting 160 out patients with MS experiencing significant problems from at least one of the following : spasticity , spasms , bladder problems , tremor or pain . The interventions were oromucosal sprays of matched placebo , or whole plant CBME containing equal amounts of delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol ( THC ) and cannabidiol ( CBD ) at a dose of 2.5- 120 mg of each daily , in divided doses . The primary outcome measure was a Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ) score for each patient ’s most troublesome symptom . Additional measures included VAS scores of other symptoms , and measures of disability , cognition , mood , sleep and fatigue . Following CBME the primary symptom score reduced from mean ( SE ) 74.36 ( 11.1 ) to 48.89 ( 22.0 ) following CBME and from 74.31 ( 12.5 ) to 54.79 ( 26.3 ) following placebo [ ns ] . Spasticity VAS scores were significantly reduced by CBME ( Sativex ) in comparison with placebo ( P- 0.001 ) . There were no significant adverse effects on cognition or mood and intoxication was generally mild Objectives : To determine whether plant-derived cannabis medicinal extracts ( CME ) can alleviate neurogenic symptoms unresponsive to st and ard treatment , and to quantify adverse effects . Design : A consecutive series of double-blind , r and omized , placebo-controlled single-patient cross-over trials with two-week treatment periods . Setting : Patients attended as out patients , but took the CME at home . Subjects : Twenty-four patients with multiple sclerosis ( 18 ) , spinal cord injury ( 4 ) , brachial plexus damage ( 1 ) , and limb amputation due to neurofibromatosis ( 1 ) . Intervention : Whole-plant extracts of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol ( THC ) , cannabidiol ( CBD ) , 1:1 CBD : THC , or matched placebo were self-administered by sublingual spray at doses determined by titration against symptom relief or unwanted effects within the range of 2.5–120 mg/24 hours . Measures used : Patients recorded symptom , well-being and intoxication scores on a daily basis using visual analogue scales . At the end of each two-week period an observer rated severity and frequency of symptoms on numerical rating scales , administered st and ard measures of disability ( Barthel Index ) , mood and cognition , and recorded adverse events . Results : Pain relief associated with both THC and CBD was significantly superior to placebo . Impaired bladder control , muscle spasms and spasticity were improved by CME in some patients with these symptoms . Three patients had transient hypotension and intoxication with rapid initial dosing of THC-containing CME . Conclusions : Cannabis medicinal extracts can improve neurogenic symptoms unresponsive to st and ard treatments . Unwanted effects are predictable and generally well tolerated . Larger scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings Medication overuse headache ( MOH ) is a severe burden to sufferers and its treatment has few evidence -based indications . The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of nabilone in reducing pain and frequency of headache , the number of analgesic intake and in increasing the quality of life on patients with long-st and ing intractable MOH . Thirty MOH patients were enrolled at the University of Modena ’s Interdepartmental Centre for Research on Headache and Drug Abuse ( Italy ) in a r and omized , double-blind , active-controlled , crossover study comparing nabilone 0.5 mg/day and ibuprofen 400 mg . The patients received each treatment orally for 8 weeks ( before nabilone and then ibuprofen or vice versa ) , with 1 week wash-out between them . R and omization and allocation ( ratio 1:1 ) were carried out by an independent pharmacy through a central computer system . Participants , care givers , and those assessing the outcomes were blinded to treatment sequence . Twenty-six subjects completed the study . Improvements from baseline were observed with both treatments . However , nabilone was more effective than ibuprofen in reducing pain intensity and daily analgesic intake ( p < 0.05 ) ; moreover , nabilone was the only drug able to reduce the level of medication dependence ( −41 % , p < 0.01 ) and to improve the quality of life ( p < 0.05 ) . Side effects were uncommon , mild and disappeared when nabilone was discontinued . This is the first r and omized controlled trial demonstrating the benefits of nabilone on headache , analgesic consumption and the quality of life in patients with intractable MOH . This drug also appears to be safe and well-tolerated . Larger scale studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of Sativex , a cannabis-based medicinal extract , as adjuvant treatment in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy ( DPN ) . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this r and omized controlled trial , 30 subjects with painful DPN received daily Sativex or placebo . The primary outcome measure was change in mean daily pain scores , and secondary outcome measures included quality -of-life assessment s. RESULTS There was significant improvement in pain scores in both groups , but mean change between groups was not significant . There were no significant differences in secondary outcome measures . Patients with depression had significantly greater baseline pain scores that improved regardless of intervention . CONCLUSIONS This first-ever trial assessing the efficacy of cannabis has shown it to be no more efficacious than placebo in painful DPN . Depression was a major confounder and may have important implication s for future trials on painful DPN Background : Central pain in multiple sclerosis ( MS ) is common and often refractory to treatment . Methods : We conducted a single-center , 5-week ( 1-week run-in , 4-week treatment ) , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled , parallel-group trial in 66 patients with MS and central pain states ( 59 dysesthetic , seven painful spasms ) of a whole-plant cannabis-based medicine ( CBM ) , containing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol : cannabidiol ( THC : CBD ) delivered via an oromucosal spray , as adjunctive analgesic treatment . Each spray delivered 2.7 mg of THC and 2.5 of CBD , and patients could gradually self-titrate to a maximum of 48 sprays in 24 hours . Results : Sixty-four patients ( 97 % ) completed the trial , 34 received CBM . In week 4 , the mean number of daily sprays taken of CBM ( n = 32 ) was 9.6 ( range 2 to 25 , SD = 6.0 ) and of placebo ( n = 31 ) was 19.1 ( range 1 to 47 , SD = 12.9 ) . Pain and sleep disturbance were recorded daily on an 11-point numerical rating scale . CBM was superior to placebo in reducing the mean intensity of pain ( CBM mean change −2.7 , 95 % CI : −3.4 to −2.0 , placebo –1.4 95 % CI : −2.0 to −0.8 , comparison between groups , p = 0.005 ) and sleep disturbance ( CBM mean change –2.5 , 95 % CI : −3.4 to −1.7 , placebo –0.8 , 95 % CI : −1.5 to −0.1 , comparison between groups , p = 0.003 ) . CBM was generally well tolerated , although more patients on CBM than placebo  reported dizziness , dry mouth , and somnolence . Cognitive side effects were limited to long-term memory storage . Conclusions : Cannabis-based medicine is effective in reducing pain and sleep disturbance in patients with multiple sclerosis related central neuropathic pain and is mostly well tolerated Medicinal cannabis has already entered mainstream medicine in some countries . This systematic review ( SR ) aim ed at evaluating the efficacy , acceptability and safety of cannabis-based medicines for chronic pain management . Qualitative systematic review of SRs of r and omized controlled trials with cannabis-based medicines for chronic pain management . The Cochrane data bases of SRs , Data base of Abstract s of Review s of Effects and PubMed were search ed for SR published in the period January 2009 to January 2017 . Assessment of the method ological quality of SR was performed by the AMSTAR checklist . Out of 748 papers identified , 10 SRs met the inclusion criteria . The method ological quality was high in four and moderate in six SRs . There were inconsistent findings of four SRs on the efficacy of cannabis-based medicines in neuropathic pain and of one SR for painful spasms in multiple sclerosis . There were consistent results that there was insufficient evidence of any cannabis-based medicine for pain management in patients with rheumatic diseases ( three SRs ) and in cancer pain ( two SRs ) . Cannabis-based medicines undoubtedly enrich the possibilities of drug treatment of chronic pain conditions . It remains the responsibility of the health care community to continue to pursue rigorous study of cannabis-based medicines to provide evidence that meets the st and ard of 21st century clinical care . SIGNIFICANCE We provide an overview of systematic review s on the efficacy , tolerability and safety of cannabis-based medicines for chronic pain management . There are inconsistent findings of the efficacy of cannabinoids in neuropathic pain and painful spasms in multiple sclerosis . There are inconsistent results on tolerability and safety of cannabis-based medicines for any chronic pain UNLABELLED Using 8-hour human laboratory experiments , we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of vaporized 
    Output:
    
agent
Pain intensity of chronic non-cancer patients was reduced by cannabinoids consumption , but effect sizes were small .
Efficacy for neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain was similar
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: UNLABELLED We assessed the efficacy of dronabinol ( Marinol capsules ; Solvay Pharmaceuticals , Brussels , Belgium ) , a synthetic Delta(9)-THC ( tetrahydrocannabinol ) , in 30 patients taking opioids for chronic pain to determine its potential analgesic effects as an adjuvant treatment . Phase I of this 2-phase study was a r and omized , single-dose , double-blinded , placebo-controlled , crossover trial in which subjects were r and omly administered either 10 mg or 20 mg of dronabinol or identical placebo capsules over the course of three , 8-hour visits . Baseline self-report measures , hourly ratings of pain intensity , pain relief , pain bothersomeness , treatment satisfaction , mood , side effects , and blood serum levels were obtained . Phase II was an extended open-label titrated trial of dronabinol as add-on medication to patients on stable doses of opioids . Results of the Phase I study showed that patients who received dronabinol experienced decreased pain intensity and increased satisfaction compared with placebo . No differences in benefit were found between the 20 mg and 10 mg doses . In the Phase II trial , titrated dronabinol contributed to significant relief of pain , reduced pain bothersomeness , and increased satisfaction compared with baseline . The incidence of side effects was dose-related . Overall , the use of dronabinol was found to result in additional analgesia among patients taking opioids for chronic noncancer pain . PERSPECTIVE This study examines the effect of adding a cannabinoid to the regimen of patients with chronic pain who report significant pain despite taking stable doses of opioids . The results of our preliminary study suggest that dronabinol , a synthetic THC , may have an additive effect on pain relief Abstract Objective To evaluate the effect of the oral synthetic δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol dronabinol on central neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis . Design R and omised double blind placebo controlled crossovertrial . Setting Outpatient clinic , University Hospital of Aarhus , Denmark . Participants 24 patients aged between 23 and 55 years with multiple sclerosis and central pain . Intervention Orally administered dronabinol at a maximum doseof 10 mg daily or corresponding placebo for three weeks ( 15 - 21days ) , separated by a three week washout period . Main outcome measure Median spontaneous pain intensity ( numericalrating scale ) in the last week of treatment . Results Median spontaneous pain intensity was significantlylower during dronabinol treatment than during placebo treatment(4.0 ( 25th to 75th centiles 2.3 to 6.0 ) v 5.0 ( 4.0 to 6.4),P = 0.02 ) , and median pain relief score ( numerical rating scale)was higher ( 3.0 ( 0 to 6.7 ) v > 0 ( 0 to 2.3 ) , P = 0.035 ) . Thenumber needed to treat for 50 % pain relief was 3.5 ( 95 % confidenceinterval 1.9 to 24.8 ) . On the SF-36 quality of life scale , thetwo items bodily pain and mental health indicated benefits fromactive treatment compared with placebo . The number of patients with adverse events was higher during active treatment , especiallyin the first week of treatment . The functional ability of themultiple sclerosis patients did not change . Conclusions Dronabinol has a modest but clinical ly relevantanalgesic effect on central pain in patients with multiple sclerosis . Adverse events , including dizziness , were more frequent withdronabinol than with placebo during the first week of treatment The objective was to determine whether a cannabis-based medicinal extract ( CBME ) benefits a range of symptoms due to multiple sclerosis ( MS ) . A parallel group , double-blind , r and omized , placebo-controlled study was undertaken in three centres , recruiting 160 out patients with MS experiencing significant problems from at least one of the following : spasticity , spasms , bladder problems , tremor or pain . The interventions were oromucosal sprays of matched placebo , or whole plant CBME containing equal amounts of delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol ( THC ) and cannabidiol ( CBD ) at a dose of 2.5- 120 mg of each daily , in divided doses . The primary outcome measure was a Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ) score for each patient ’s most troublesome symptom . Additional measures included VAS scores of other symptoms , and measures of disability , cognition , mood , sleep and fatigue . Following CBME the primary symptom score reduced from mean ( SE ) 74.36 ( 11.1 ) to 48.89 ( 22.0 ) following CBME and from 74.31 ( 12.5 ) to 54.79 ( 26.3 ) following placebo [ ns ] . Spasticity VAS scores were significantly reduced by CBME ( Sativex ) in comparison with placebo ( P- 0.001 ) . There were no significant adverse effects on cognition or mood and intoxication was generally mild Objectives : To determine whether plant-derived cannabis medicinal extracts ( CME ) can alleviate neurogenic symptoms unresponsive to st and ard treatment , and to quantify adverse effects . Design : A consecutive series of double-blind , r and omized , placebo-controlled single-patient cross-over trials with two-week treatment periods . Setting : Patients attended as out patients , but took the CME at home . Subjects : Twenty-four patients with multiple sclerosis ( 18 ) , spinal cord injury ( 4 ) , brachial plexus damage ( 1 ) , and limb amputation due to neurofibromatosis ( 1 ) . Intervention : Whole-plant extracts of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol ( THC ) , cannabidiol ( CBD ) , 1:1 CBD : THC , or matched placebo were self-administered by sublingual spray at doses determined by titration against symptom relief or unwanted effects within the range of 2.5–120 mg/24 hours . Measures used : Patients recorded symptom , well-being and intoxication scores on a daily basis using visual analogue scales . At the end of each two-week period an observer rated severity and frequency of symptoms on numerical rating scales , administered st and ard measures of disability ( Barthel Index ) , mood and cognition , and recorded adverse events . Results : Pain relief associated with both THC and CBD was significantly superior to placebo . Impaired bladder control , muscle spasms and spasticity were improved by CME in some patients with these symptoms . Three patients had transient hypotension and intoxication with rapid initial dosing of THC-containing CME . Conclusions : Cannabis medicinal extracts can improve neurogenic symptoms unresponsive to st and ard treatments . Unwanted effects are predictable and generally well tolerated . Larger scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings Medication overuse headache ( MOH ) is a severe burden to sufferers and its treatment has few evidence -based indications . The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of nabilone in reducing pain and frequency of headache , the number of analgesic intake and in increasing the quality of life on patients with long-st and ing intractable MOH . Thirty MOH patients were enrolled at the University of Modena ’s Interdepartmental Centre for Research on Headache and Drug Abuse ( Italy ) in a r and omized , double-blind , active-controlled , crossover study comparing nabilone 0.5 mg/day and ibuprofen 400 mg . The patients received each treatment orally for 8 weeks ( before nabilone and then ibuprofen or vice versa ) , with 1 week wash-out between them . R and omization and allocation ( ratio 1:1 ) were carried out by an independent pharmacy through a central computer system . Participants , care givers , and those assessing the outcomes were blinded to treatment sequence . Twenty-six subjects completed the study . Improvements from baseline were observed with both treatments . However , nabilone was more effective than ibuprofen in reducing pain intensity and daily analgesic intake ( p < 0.05 ) ; moreover , nabilone was the only drug able to reduce the level of medication dependence ( −41 % , p < 0.01 ) and to improve the quality of life ( p < 0.05 ) . Side effects were uncommon , mild and disappeared when nabilone was discontinued . This is the first r and omized controlled trial demonstrating the benefits of nabilone on headache , analgesic consumption and the quality of life in patients with intractable MOH . This drug also appears to be safe and well-tolerated . Larger scale studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of Sativex , a cannabis-based medicinal extract , as adjuvant treatment in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy ( DPN ) . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this r and omized controlled trial , 30 subjects with painful DPN received daily Sativex or placebo . The primary outcome measure was change in mean daily pain scores , and secondary outcome measures included quality -of-life assessment s. RESULTS There was significant improvement in pain scores in both groups , but mean change between groups was not significant . There were no significant differences in secondary outcome measures . Patients with depression had significantly greater baseline pain scores that improved regardless of intervention . CONCLUSIONS This first-ever trial assessing the efficacy of cannabis has shown it to be no more efficacious than placebo in painful DPN . Depression was a major confounder and may have important implication s for future trials on painful DPN Background : Central pain in multiple sclerosis ( MS ) is common and often refractory to treatment . Methods : We conducted a single-center , 5-week ( 1-week run-in , 4-week treatment ) , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled , parallel-group trial in 66 patients with MS and central pain states ( 59 dysesthetic , seven painful spasms ) of a whole-plant cannabis-based medicine ( CBM ) , containing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol : cannabidiol ( THC : CBD ) delivered via an oromucosal spray , as adjunctive analgesic treatment . Each spray delivered 2.7 mg of THC and 2.5 of CBD , and patients could gradually self-titrate to a maximum of 48 sprays in 24 hours . Results : Sixty-four patients ( 97 % ) completed the trial , 34 received CBM . In week 4 , the mean number of daily sprays taken of CBM ( n = 32 ) was 9.6 ( range 2 to 25 , SD = 6.0 ) and of placebo ( n = 31 ) was 19.1 ( range 1 to 47 , SD = 12.9 ) . Pain and sleep disturbance were recorded daily on an 11-point numerical rating scale . CBM was superior to placebo in reducing the mean intensity of pain ( CBM mean change −2.7 , 95 % CI : −3.4 to −2.0 , placebo –1.4 95 % CI : −2.0 to −0.8 , comparison between groups , p = 0.005 ) and sleep disturbance ( CBM mean change –2.5 , 95 % CI : −3.4 to −1.7 , placebo –0.8 , 95 % CI : −1.5 to −0.1 , comparison between groups , p = 0.003 ) . CBM was generally well tolerated , although more patients on CBM than placebo  reported dizziness , dry mouth , and somnolence . Cognitive side effects were limited to long-term memory storage . Conclusions : Cannabis-based medicine is effective in reducing pain and sleep disturbance in patients with multiple sclerosis related central neuropathic pain and is mostly well tolerated Medicinal cannabis has already entered mainstream medicine in some countries . This systematic review ( SR ) aim ed at evaluating the efficacy , acceptability and safety of cannabis-based medicines for chronic pain management . Qualitative systematic review of SRs of r and omized controlled trials with cannabis-based medicines for chronic pain management . The Cochrane data bases of SRs , Data base of Abstract s of Review s of Effects and PubMed were search ed for SR published in the period January 2009 to January 2017 . Assessment of the method ological quality of SR was performed by the AMSTAR checklist . Out of 748 papers identified , 10 SRs met the inclusion criteria . The method ological quality was high in four and moderate in six SRs . There were inconsistent findings of four SRs on the efficacy of cannabis-based medicines in neuropathic pain and of one SR for painful spasms in multiple sclerosis . There were consistent results that there was insufficient evidence of any cannabis-based medicine for pain management in patients with rheumatic diseases ( three SRs ) and in cancer pain ( two SRs ) . Cannabis-based medicines undoubtedly enrich the possibilities of drug treatment of chronic pain conditions . It remains the responsibility of the health care community to continue to pursue rigorous study of cannabis-based medicines to provide evidence that meets the st and ard of 21st century clinical care . SIGNIFICANCE We provide an overview of systematic review s on the efficacy , tolerability and safety of cannabis-based medicines for chronic pain management . There are inconsistent findings of the efficacy of cannabinoids in neuropathic pain and painful spasms in multiple sclerosis . There are inconsistent results on tolerability and safety of cannabis-based medicines for any chronic pain UNLABELLED Using 8-hour human laboratory experiments , we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of vaporized 
    Output:
    