human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Aim To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mobile phone intervention to improve exercise capacity and physical activity behaviour in people with ischaemic heart disease ( IHD ) . Methods and results In this single-blind , parallel , two-arm , r and omized controlled trial adults ( n = 171 ) with IHD were r and omized to receive a mobile phone delivered intervention  ( HEART ; n = 85 ) plus usual care , or usual care alone ( n = 86 ) . Adult participants aged 18 years or more , with a diagnosis of IHD , were clinical ly stable as out patients , able to perform exercise , able to underst and and write English , and had access to the Internet . The HEART ( Heart Exercise And Remote Technologies ) intervention involved a personalized , automated package of text messages and a secure website with video messages aim ed at increasing exercise behaviour , delivered over 24 weeks . All participants were able to access usual community-based cardiac rehabilitation , which involves encouragement of physical activity and an offer to join a local cardiac support club . All outcomes were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks and included peak oxygen uptake ( PVO2 ; primary outcome ) , self-reported physical activity , health-related quality of life , self-efficacy and motivation ( secondary outcomes ) . Results showed no differences in PVO2 between the two groups ( difference −0.21 ml kg−1 min−1 , 95 % CI : −1.1 , 0.7 ; p = 0.65 ) at 24 weeks . However significant treatment effects were observed for selected secondary outcomes , including leisure time physical activity ( difference 110.2 min/week , 95 % CI : −0.8 , 221.3 ; p = 0.05 ) and walking ( difference 151.4 min/week , 95 % CI : 27.6 , 275.2 ; p = 0.02 ) . There were also significant improvements in self-efficacy to be active ( difference 6.2 % , 95 % CI : 0.2 , 12.2 ; p = 0.04 ) and the general health domain of the SF36 ( difference 2.1 , 95 % CI : 0.1 , 4.1 ; p = 0.03 ) at 24 weeks . The HEART programme was considered likely to be cost-effective for leisure time activity and walking . Conclusions A mobile phone intervention was not effective at increasing exercise capacity over and above usual care . The intervention was effective and probably cost-effective for increasing physical activity and may have the potential to augment existing cardiac rehabilitation services Objective A recent meta- analysis surmised pedometers were a useful panacea to independently reduce sedentary time ( ST ) . To further test and exp and on this deduction , we analyzed the ability of a consumer-wearable activity tracker to reduce ST and prolonged sedentary bouts ( PSB ) . We originally conducted a 12-month r and omized control trial where 800 employees from 13 organizations were assigned to control , activity tracker  , or one of two activity tracker plus incentive groups design ed to increase step count . The primary outcome was accelerometer measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity . Results We conducted a secondary analysis on accelerometer measured daily ST and PSB bouts . A general linear mixed model was used to examine changes in ST and prolonged sedentary bouts , followed by between-group pairwise comparisons . Regression analyses were conducted to examine the association of changes in step counts with ST and PSB . The changes in ST and PSB were not statistically significant and not different between the groups ( P < 0.05 ) . Increases in step counts were concomitantly associated with decreases in ST and PSB , regardless of intervention ( P < 0.05 ) . Caution should be taken when considering consumer-wearable activity trackers as a means to reduce sedentary behavior . Trial registration NCT01855776 Registered : August 8 , BACKGROUND Despite the increasing popularity of activity trackers , little evidence exists that they can improve health outcomes . We aim ed to investigate whether use of activity trackers , alone or in combination with cash incentives or charitable donations , lead to increases in physical activity and improvements in health outcomes . METHODS In this r and omised controlled trial , employees from 13 organisations in Singapore were r and omly assigned ( 1:1:1:1 ) with a computer generated assignment schedule to control ( no tracker or incentives ) , Fitbit Zip activity tracker , tracker plus charity incentives , or tracker plus cash incentives .  Participants had to be English speaking , full-time employees , aged 21 - 65 years , able to walk at least ten steps continuously , and non-pregnant . Incentives were tied to weekly steps , and the primary outcome , moderate-to-vigorous physical activity ( MVPA ) bout min per week , was measured via a sealed accelerometer and assessed on an intention-to-treat basis at 6 months ( end of intervention ) and 12 months ( after a 6 month post-intervention follow-up period ) . Other outcome measures included steps , participants meeting 70 000 steps per week target , and health-related outcomes including weight , blood pressure , and quality -of-life measures . This trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT01855776 . FINDINGS Between June 13 , 2013 , and Aug 15 , 2014 , 800 participants were recruited and r and omly assigned to the control ( n=201 ) , Fitbit ( n=203 ) , charity ( n=199 ) , and cash ( n=197 ) groups . At 6 months , compared with control , the cash group logged an additional 29 MVPA bout min per week ( 95 % CI 10 - 47 ; p=0·0024 ) and the charity group an additional 21 MVPA bout min per week ( 2 - 39 ; p=0·0310 ) ; the difference between Fitbit only and control was not significant ( 16 MVPA bout min per week [ -2 to 35 ; p=0·0854 ] ) . Increases in MVPA bout min per week in the cash and charity groups were not significantly greater than that of the Fitbit group . At 12 months , the Fitbit group logged an additional 37 MVPA bout min per week ( 19 - 56 ; p=0·0001 ) and the charity group an additional 32 MVPA bout min per week ( 12 - 51 ; p=0·0013 ) compared with control ; the difference between cash and control was not significant ( 15 MVPA bout min per week [ -5 to 34 ; p=0·1363 ] ) . A decrease in physical activity of -23 MVPA bout min per week ( 95 % CI -42 to -4 ; p=0·0184 ) was seen when comparing the cash group with the Fitbit group . There were no improvements in any health outcomes ( weight , blood pressure , etc ) at either assessment . INTERPRETATION The cash incentive was most effective at increasing MVPA bout min per week at 6 months , but this effect was not sustained 6 months after the incentives were discontinued . At 12 months , the activity tracker with or without charity incentives were effective at stemming the reduction in MVPA bout min per week seen in the control group , but we identified no evidence of improvements in health outcomes , either with or without incentives , calling into question the value of these devices for health promotion . Although other incentive strategies might generate greater increases in step activity and improvements in health outcomes , incentives would probably need to be in place long term to avoid any potential decrease in physical activity result ing from discontinuation . FUNDING Ministry of Health , Singapore Objective Cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ) is pivotal in preventing recurring events of myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) . This study aims to investigate the effect of a smartphone-based home service delivery ( Care Assessment Platform ) of CR ( CAP-CR ) on  CR  use and health outcomes compared with a traditional , centre-based programme ( TCR ) in post-MI patients . Methods In this unblinded r and omised controlled trial , post-MI patients were r and omised to TCR ( n=60 ; 55.7±10.4 years ) and CAP-CR ( n=60 ; 55.5±9.6 years ) for a 6-week CR and 6-month self-maintenance period . CAP-CR , delivered in participants ’ homes , included health and exercise monitoring , motivational and educational material delivery , and weekly mentoring consultations . CAP-CR uptake , adherence and completion rates were compared with TCR using intention-to-treat analyses . Changes in clinical outcomes ( modifiable lifestyle factors , biomedical risk factors and health-related quality of life ) across baseline , 6 weeks and 6 months were compared within , and between , groups using linear mixed model regression . Results CAP-CR had significantly higher uptake ( 80 % vs 62 % ) , adherence ( 94 % vs 68 % ) and completion ( 80 % vs 47 % ) rates than TCR ( p<0.05 ) . Both groups showed significant improvements in 6-minute walk test from baseline to 6 weeks ( TCR : 537±86–584±99 m ; CAP-CR : 510±77–570±80 m ) , which was maintained at 6 months . CAP-CR  showed slight weight reduction ( 89±20–88±21 kg ) and also demonstrated significant improvements in emotional state ( K10 : median ( IQR ) 14.6 ( 13.4–16.0 ) to 12.6 ( 11.5–13.8 ) ) , and quality of life ( EQ5D-Index : median ( IQR ) 0.84 ( 0.8–0.9 ) to 0.92 ( 0.9–1.0 ) ) at 6 weeks . Conclusions This smartphone-based home care CR programme improved post-MI CR uptake , adherence and completion . The home-based CR programme was as effective in improving physiological and psychological health outcomes  as traditional CR . CAP-CR is a viable option towards optimising use of CR services . Trial registration number ANZCTR12609000251224 Background Although many wearable devices for monitoring and tracking physical activity are available to consumers , relatively few research studies have been conducted to determine their efficacy in promoting health . Methods In this article , data on the use of consumer wearable devices in promoting healthy behaviors  are summarized based upon bibliographic search es in PubMed and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection with relevant search terms through September 2016 . Results A total of 274 articles were identified in the bibliographic search es . By screening abstract s or full-text articles , six pre/post test trials and seven r and omized controlled trials were identified . In initial trials , consumer wearable devices have been shown to increase physical activity and help users lose weight . However , the number of studies completed to date is small and limited by small sample sizes , short study duration s , and uncertain generalizability of the findings . Conclusions Future studies should utilize r and omized controlled trial research design s , larger sample sizes , and longer study periods to better establish the efficacy of wearable devices in promoting physical activity . Additional research is needed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of wearable devices in promoting physical activity and weight loss in community setting s including communities affected by health disparities . Studies focusing on children and adolescents are also needed QUESTIONS Does the PEDro scale measure only one construct ie , the method ological quality of clinical trials ? What is the hierarchy of items of the PEDro scale from least to most adhered to ? Is there any effect of year of publication of trials on item adherence ? Are PEDro scale ordinal scores equivalent to interval data ? DESIGN Rasch analysis of two independent sample s of 100 clinical trials from the PEDro data base scored using the PEDro scale . RESULTS Both sample s of PEDro data showed fit to the Rasch model with no item misfit . The  PEDro scale item hierarchy was the same in both sample s , ranging from the most adhered to item r and om allocation , to the least adhered to item therapist blinding . There was no differential item functioning by year of publication . Original PEDro ordinal scores were highly correlated with transformed PEDro interval scores ( r = 0.99 ) . CONCLUSION The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the method ological quality of clinical trials . It is valid to sum PEDro scale item scores to obtain a total score that can be treated as interval level measurement and subjected to parametric statistical analysis Background Given the global prevalence of insufficient physical activity ( PA ) , effective interventions that attenuate age-related decline in PA levels are needed . Mobile phone interventions that positively affect health ( mHealth ) show promise ; however , their impact on PA levels and fitness in young people is unclear and little is known about what makes a good mHealth app . Objective The aim was to determine the effects of two commercially available smartphone apps ( Zombies , Run and Get Running ) on cardiorespiratory fitness and PA levels in insufficiently active healthy young people . A second aim was to identify the features of the app design that may contribute to improved fitness and PA levels . Methods Apps for IMproving FITness ( AIM FIT ) was a 3-arm , parallel , r and omized controlled trial conducted in Auckl and , New Zeal and . Participants were recruited through advertisements in electronic mailing lists , local newspapers , flyers posted in community locations , and presentations at schools . Eligible young people aged 14 - 17 years were allocated at r and om to 1 of 3 conditions : ( 1 ) use of an immersive app ( Zombies , Run ) , ( 2 ) use of a nonimmersive app ( Get Running ) , or ( 3 ) usual behavior ( control ) . Both smartphone apps consisted of a fully automated 8-week training program design ed to improve fitness and ability to run 5 km ; however , the immersive app featured a game-themed design and narrative . 
    Output:
    
agent
There was no significant between group difference in six-minute walk test distance .
Conclusions Our meta- analysis showed WPAM with exercise prescription or advice are superior to no device in improving CRF in the maintenance phase of CR and no cardiac adverse events were reported with WPAM use .
Our qualitative analysis showed evidence in favour of WPAM with exercise prescription or advice for both CRF and step count .
WPAM with exercise prescription or advice did not change sedentary time .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Aim To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mobile phone intervention to improve exercise capacity and physical activity behaviour in people with ischaemic heart disease ( IHD ) . Methods and results In this single-blind , parallel , two-arm , r and omized controlled trial adults ( n = 171 ) with IHD were r and omized to receive a mobile phone delivered intervention  ( HEART ; n = 85 ) plus usual care , or usual care alone ( n = 86 ) . Adult participants aged 18 years or more , with a diagnosis of IHD , were clinical ly stable as out patients , able to perform exercise , able to underst and and write English , and had access to the Internet . The HEART ( Heart Exercise And Remote Technologies ) intervention involved a personalized , automated package of text messages and a secure website with video messages aim ed at increasing exercise behaviour , delivered over 24 weeks . All participants were able to access usual community-based cardiac rehabilitation , which involves encouragement of physical activity and an offer to join a local cardiac support club . All outcomes were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks and included peak oxygen uptake ( PVO2 ; primary outcome ) , self-reported physical activity , health-related quality of life , self-efficacy and motivation ( secondary outcomes ) . Results showed no differences in PVO2 between the two groups ( difference −0.21 ml kg−1 min−1 , 95 % CI : −1.1 , 0.7 ; p = 0.65 ) at 24 weeks . However significant treatment effects were observed for selected secondary outcomes , including leisure time physical activity ( difference 110.2 min/week , 95 % CI : −0.8 , 221.3 ; p = 0.05 ) and walking ( difference 151.4 min/week , 95 % CI : 27.6 , 275.2 ; p = 0.02 ) . There were also significant improvements in self-efficacy to be active ( difference 6.2 % , 95 % CI : 0.2 , 12.2 ; p = 0.04 ) and the general health domain of the SF36 ( difference 2.1 , 95 % CI : 0.1 , 4.1 ; p = 0.03 ) at 24 weeks . The HEART programme was considered likely to be cost-effective for leisure time activity and walking . Conclusions A mobile phone intervention was not effective at increasing exercise capacity over and above usual care . The intervention was effective and probably cost-effective for increasing physical activity and may have the potential to augment existing cardiac rehabilitation services Objective A recent meta- analysis surmised pedometers were a useful panacea to independently reduce sedentary time ( ST ) . To further test and exp and on this deduction , we analyzed the ability of a consumer-wearable activity tracker to reduce ST and prolonged sedentary bouts ( PSB ) . We originally conducted a 12-month r and omized control trial where 800 employees from 13 organizations were assigned to control , activity tracker  , or one of two activity tracker plus incentive groups design ed to increase step count . The primary outcome was accelerometer measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity . Results We conducted a secondary analysis on accelerometer measured daily ST and PSB bouts . A general linear mixed model was used to examine changes in ST and prolonged sedentary bouts , followed by between-group pairwise comparisons . Regression analyses were conducted to examine the association of changes in step counts with ST and PSB . The changes in ST and PSB were not statistically significant and not different between the groups ( P < 0.05 ) . Increases in step counts were concomitantly associated with decreases in ST and PSB , regardless of intervention ( P < 0.05 ) . Caution should be taken when considering consumer-wearable activity trackers as a means to reduce sedentary behavior . Trial registration NCT01855776 Registered : August 8 , BACKGROUND Despite the increasing popularity of activity trackers , little evidence exists that they can improve health outcomes . We aim ed to investigate whether use of activity trackers , alone or in combination with cash incentives or charitable donations , lead to increases in physical activity and improvements in health outcomes . METHODS In this r and omised controlled trial , employees from 13 organisations in Singapore were r and omly assigned ( 1:1:1:1 ) with a computer generated assignment schedule to control ( no tracker or incentives ) , Fitbit Zip activity tracker , tracker plus charity incentives , or tracker plus cash incentives .  Participants had to be English speaking , full-time employees , aged 21 - 65 years , able to walk at least ten steps continuously , and non-pregnant . Incentives were tied to weekly steps , and the primary outcome , moderate-to-vigorous physical activity ( MVPA ) bout min per week , was measured via a sealed accelerometer and assessed on an intention-to-treat basis at 6 months ( end of intervention ) and 12 months ( after a 6 month post-intervention follow-up period ) . Other outcome measures included steps , participants meeting 70 000 steps per week target , and health-related outcomes including weight , blood pressure , and quality -of-life measures . This trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT01855776 . FINDINGS Between June 13 , 2013 , and Aug 15 , 2014 , 800 participants were recruited and r and omly assigned to the control ( n=201 ) , Fitbit ( n=203 ) , charity ( n=199 ) , and cash ( n=197 ) groups . At 6 months , compared with control , the cash group logged an additional 29 MVPA bout min per week ( 95 % CI 10 - 47 ; p=0·0024 ) and the charity group an additional 21 MVPA bout min per week ( 2 - 39 ; p=0·0310 ) ; the difference between Fitbit only and control was not significant ( 16 MVPA bout min per week [ -2 to 35 ; p=0·0854 ] ) . Increases in MVPA bout min per week in the cash and charity groups were not significantly greater than that of the Fitbit group . At 12 months , the Fitbit group logged an additional 37 MVPA bout min per week ( 19 - 56 ; p=0·0001 ) and the charity group an additional 32 MVPA bout min per week ( 12 - 51 ; p=0·0013 ) compared with control ; the difference between cash and control was not significant ( 15 MVPA bout min per week [ -5 to 34 ; p=0·1363 ] ) . A decrease in physical activity of -23 MVPA bout min per week ( 95 % CI -42 to -4 ; p=0·0184 ) was seen when comparing the cash group with the Fitbit group . There were no improvements in any health outcomes ( weight , blood pressure , etc ) at either assessment . INTERPRETATION The cash incentive was most effective at increasing MVPA bout min per week at 6 months , but this effect was not sustained 6 months after the incentives were discontinued . At 12 months , the activity tracker with or without charity incentives were effective at stemming the reduction in MVPA bout min per week seen in the control group , but we identified no evidence of improvements in health outcomes , either with or without incentives , calling into question the value of these devices for health promotion . Although other incentive strategies might generate greater increases in step activity and improvements in health outcomes , incentives would probably need to be in place long term to avoid any potential decrease in physical activity result ing from discontinuation . FUNDING Ministry of Health , Singapore Objective Cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ) is pivotal in preventing recurring events of myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) . This study aims to investigate the effect of a smartphone-based home service delivery ( Care Assessment Platform ) of CR ( CAP-CR ) on  CR  use and health outcomes compared with a traditional , centre-based programme ( TCR ) in post-MI patients . Methods In this unblinded r and omised controlled trial , post-MI patients were r and omised to TCR ( n=60 ; 55.7±10.4 years ) and CAP-CR ( n=60 ; 55.5±9.6 years ) for a 6-week CR and 6-month self-maintenance period . CAP-CR , delivered in participants ’ homes , included health and exercise monitoring , motivational and educational material delivery , and weekly mentoring consultations . CAP-CR uptake , adherence and completion rates were compared with TCR using intention-to-treat analyses . Changes in clinical outcomes ( modifiable lifestyle factors , biomedical risk factors and health-related quality of life ) across baseline , 6 weeks and 6 months were compared within , and between , groups using linear mixed model regression . Results CAP-CR had significantly higher uptake ( 80 % vs 62 % ) , adherence ( 94 % vs 68 % ) and completion ( 80 % vs 47 % ) rates than TCR ( p<0.05 ) . Both groups showed significant improvements in 6-minute walk test from baseline to 6 weeks ( TCR : 537±86–584±99 m ; CAP-CR : 510±77–570±80 m ) , which was maintained at 6 months . CAP-CR  showed slight weight reduction ( 89±20–88±21 kg ) and also demonstrated significant improvements in emotional state ( K10 : median ( IQR ) 14.6 ( 13.4–16.0 ) to 12.6 ( 11.5–13.8 ) ) , and quality of life ( EQ5D-Index : median ( IQR ) 0.84 ( 0.8–0.9 ) to 0.92 ( 0.9–1.0 ) ) at 6 weeks . Conclusions This smartphone-based home care CR programme improved post-MI CR uptake , adherence and completion . The home-based CR programme was as effective in improving physiological and psychological health outcomes  as traditional CR . CAP-CR is a viable option towards optimising use of CR services . Trial registration number ANZCTR12609000251224 Background Although many wearable devices for monitoring and tracking physical activity are available to consumers , relatively few research studies have been conducted to determine their efficacy in promoting health . Methods In this article , data on the use of consumer wearable devices in promoting healthy behaviors  are summarized based upon bibliographic search es in PubMed and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection with relevant search terms through September 2016 . Results A total of 274 articles were identified in the bibliographic search es . By screening abstract s or full-text articles , six pre/post test trials and seven r and omized controlled trials were identified . In initial trials , consumer wearable devices have been shown to increase physical activity and help users lose weight . However , the number of studies completed to date is small and limited by small sample sizes , short study duration s , and uncertain generalizability of the findings . Conclusions Future studies should utilize r and omized controlled trial research design s , larger sample sizes , and longer study periods to better establish the efficacy of wearable devices in promoting physical activity . Additional research is needed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of wearable devices in promoting physical activity and weight loss in community setting s including communities affected by health disparities . Studies focusing on children and adolescents are also needed QUESTIONS Does the PEDro scale measure only one construct ie , the method ological quality of clinical trials ? What is the hierarchy of items of the PEDro scale from least to most adhered to ? Is there any effect of year of publication of trials on item adherence ? Are PEDro scale ordinal scores equivalent to interval data ? DESIGN Rasch analysis of two independent sample s of 100 clinical trials from the PEDro data base scored using the PEDro scale . RESULTS Both sample s of PEDro data showed fit to the Rasch model with no item misfit . The  PEDro scale item hierarchy was the same in both sample s , ranging from the most adhered to item r and om allocation , to the least adhered to item therapist blinding . There was no differential item functioning by year of publication . Original PEDro ordinal scores were highly correlated with transformed PEDro interval scores ( r = 0.99 ) . CONCLUSION The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the method ological quality of clinical trials . It is valid to sum PEDro scale item scores to obtain a total score that can be treated as interval level measurement and subjected to parametric statistical analysis Background Given the global prevalence of insufficient physical activity ( PA ) , effective interventions that attenuate age-related decline in PA levels are needed . Mobile phone interventions that positively affect health ( mHealth ) show promise ; however , their impact on PA levels and fitness in young people is unclear and little is known about what makes a good mHealth app . Objective The aim was to determine the effects of two commercially available smartphone apps ( Zombies , Run and Get Running ) on cardiorespiratory fitness and PA levels in insufficiently active healthy young people . A second aim was to identify the features of the app design that may contribute to improved fitness and PA levels . Methods Apps for IMproving FITness ( AIM FIT ) was a 3-arm , parallel , r and omized controlled trial conducted in Auckl and , New Zeal and . Participants were recruited through advertisements in electronic mailing lists , local newspapers , flyers posted in community locations , and presentations at schools . Eligible young people aged 14 - 17 years were allocated at r and om to 1 of 3 conditions : ( 1 ) use of an immersive app ( Zombies , Run ) , ( 2 ) use of a nonimmersive app ( Get Running ) , or ( 3 ) usual behavior ( control ) . Both smartphone apps consisted of a fully automated 8-week training program design ed to improve fitness and ability to run 5 km ; however , the immersive app featured a game-themed design and narrative . 
    Output:
    