human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background In a recent exploratory r and omised trial we found that a novel , internet-based psychoeducation programme for bipolar disorder ( Beating Bipolar ) was relatively easy to deliver and had a modest effect on psychological quality of life . We sought to explore the experiences of participants with respect to feasibility , acceptability and impact of Beating Bipolar . Methods Participants were invited to take part in a semi-structured interview . Thematic analysis techniques were employed ; to explore and describe participants ’ experiences , the data were analysed for emerging themes which were identified and coded . Results The programme was feasible to deliver and acceptable to participants where they felt comfortable using a computer . It was found to impact upon insight into illness , health behaviour , personal routines and positive attitudes towards medication . Many participants regarded the programme as likely to be most beneficial for those recently diagnosed . Conclusions An online psychoeducation package for bipolar disorder , such as Beating Bipolar , is feasible and acceptable to patients , has a positive impact on self-management behaviours and may be particularly suited to early intervention . Alternative ( non-internet ) formats should also be made available to patients Background Patients with bipolar disorder often show decreased adherence with mood stabilizers and frequently interventions on prodromal depressive and manic symptoms are delayed . Recently , the MONARCA I r and omized controlled trial investigated the effect of electronic self-monitoring using smartphones on depressive and manic symptoms . The findings suggested that patients using the MONARCA system had more sustained depressive symptoms than patients using a smartphone for normal communicative purpose s , but had fewer manic symptoms during the trial . It is likely that the ability of these self-monitored measures to detect prodromal symptoms of depression and mania may be insufficient compared to automatically generated objective data on measures of illness activity such as phone usage , social activity , physical activity , and mobility . The Monsenso system , for smartphones integrating subjective and objective measures of illness activity was developed and will be tested in the present trial . Methods The MONARCA II trial uses a r and omized controlled single-blind parallel-group design . Patients with bipolar disorder according to ICD-10 who previously have been treated at the Copenhagen Clinic for Affective Disorder , Denmark are included and r and omized to either daily use of the Monsenso system including an feedback loop between patients and clinicians ( the intervention group ) or to the use of a smartphone for normal communicative purpose s ( the control group ) for a 9-month trial period . The trial was started in September 2014 and recruitment is ongoing . The outcomes are : differences in depressive and manic symptoms ; rate of depressive and manic episodes ( primary ) ; automatically generated objective data on measures of illness activity ; number of days hospitalized ; psychosocial functioning ( secondary ) ; perceived stress ; quality of life ; self-rated depressive symptoms ; self-rated manic symptoms ; recovery ; empowerment and adherence to medication ( tertiary ) between the intervention group and the control group during the trial . Ethical permission has been obtained . Positive , neutral and negative findings will be published . Discussion If the system is effective in reducing depressive and /or manic symptoms ( and other symptoms of bipolar disorder ) and the rate of episodes , there will be basis for extending the use to the treatment of bipolar disorder in general and in larger scale . Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT02221336 . Registered 26th of September 2014 Introduction Electronic self-monitoring of affective symptoms using cell phones is suggested as a practical and inexpensive way to monitor illness activity and identify early signs of affective symptoms . It has never been tested in a r and omised clinical trial whether electronic self-monitoring improves outcomes in bipolar disorder . We are conducting a trial testing the effect of using a Smartphone for self-monitoring in bipolar disorder . Methods We developed the MONARCA application for And roid-based Smartphones , allowing patients suffering from bipolar disorder to do daily self-monitoring — including an interactive feedback loop between patients and clinicians through a web-based interface . The effect of the application was tested in a parallel-group , single-blind r and omised controlled trial so far including 78 patients suffering from bipolar disorder in the age group 18–60 years who were given the use of a Smartphone with the MONARCA application ( intervention group ) or to the use of a cell phone without the application ( placebo group ) during a 6-month study period . The study was carried out from September 2011 . The outcomes were changes in affective symptoms ( primary ) , social functioning , perceived stress , self-rated depressive and manic symptoms , quality of life , adherence to medication , stress and cognitive functioning ( secondary and tertiary ) . Analysis Recruitment is ongoing . Ethics Ethical permission has been obtained . Dissemination Positive , neutral and negative findings of the study will be published . Registration details The trial is approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in The Capital Region of Denmark ( H-2 - 2011 - 056 ) and The Danish Data Protection Agency ( 2013 - 41 - 1710 ) . The trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov as NCT01446406 Background The Internet has potential as a medium for health behavior change programs , but no controlled studies have yet evaluated the impact of a fully automated physical activity intervention over several months with real-time objective feedback from a monitor . Objective The aim was to evaluate the impact of a physical activity program based on the Internet and mobile phone technology provided to individuals for 9 weeks . Methods A single-center , r and omized , stratified controlled trial was conducted from September to December 2005 in Bedfordshire , United Kingdom , with 77 healthy adults whose mean age was 40.4 years ( SD = 7.6 ) and mean body mass index was 26.3 ( SD = 3.4 ) . Participants were r and omized to a test group that had access to an Internet and mobile phone – based physical activity program  ( n = 47 ) or to a control group ( n = 30 ) that  received no support . The test group received tailored solutions for perceived barriers , a schedule to plan weekly exercise sessions with mobile phone and email reminders , a message board to share their experiences with others , and feedback on their level of physical activity . Both groups were issued a wrist-worn accelerometer to monitor their level of physical activity ;  only the test group received real-time feedback via the Internet . The main outcome measures were accelerometer data and self-report of physical activity . Results At the end of the study period , the test group reported a significantly greater increase over baseline than did the control group for perceived control ( P < .001 ) and intention/expectation to exercise ( P < .001 ) . Intent-to-treat analyses of both the accelerometer data ( P = .02 ) and leisure time self-report data ( P = .03 ) found a higher level of moderate physical activity in the test group . The average increase ( over the control group ) in accelerometer-measured moderate physical activity was 2 h 18 min per week . The test group also lost more percent body fat than the control group ( test group : −2.18 , SD = 0.59 ; control group : −0.17 , SD = 0.81 ; P = .04 ) . Conclusions A fully automated Internet and mobile phone – based motivation and action support system can significantly increase and maintain the level of physical activity in healthy adults CONTEXT Despite the availability of efficacious treatments , the long-term course of bipolar disorder is often unfavorable . OBJECTIVE To test the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention program to improve the quality of care and long-term outcomes for persons with bipolar disorder . DESIGN R and omized controlled trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment . SETTING Mental health clinics of a group-model prepaid health plan . PATIENTS Of 785 patients in treatment for bipolar disorder who were invited to participate , 509 attended an evaluation appointment , 450 were found eligible to participate , and 441 enrolled in the trial . INTERVENTIONS Participants were r and omly assigned to a multicomponent intervention program or to continued care as usual . Three nurse care managers provided a 2-year systematic intervention program , including the following : a structured group psychoeducational program , monthly telephone monitoring of mood symptoms and medication adherence , feedback to treating mental health providers , facilitation of appropriate follow-up care , and as-needed outreach and crisis intervention . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES In-person blinded research interviews every 3 months assessed mood symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Examination . Health plan administrative records were used to assess the use and cost of mental health services . RESULTS Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated that the intervention significantly reduced the mean level of mania symptoms ( z = 2.09 , P = .04 ) and the time with significant mania symptoms ( 19.2 vs 24.7 weeks ; F(1 ) = 6.0 , P = .01 ) . There was no significant intervention effect on mean level of depressive symptoms ( z = 0.19 , P = .85 ) or time with significant depressive symptoms ( 47.6 vs 50.7 weeks ; F(1 ) = 0.56 , P = .45 ) . Benefits of the intervention were found only in a subgroup of 343 persons with clinical ly significant mood symptoms  at the baseline assessment . The incremental cost ( adjusted ) of the intervention was 1251 dollars ( 95 % confidence interval , 55 - 2446 dollars ) , including approximately 800 dollars for the intervention program services and an approximate 500 dollars increase in the costs of other mental health services . CONCLUSIONS Population -based systematic care programs can significantly reduce the frequency and severity of mania in bipolar disorder , and cost increases are modest considering the clinical gains . The incorporation of more specific cognitive and behavioral content or more effective medication regimens may be necessary to significantly reduce the symptoms of depression BACKGROUND The number of studies on electronic self-monitoring in affective disorder and other psychiatric disorders is increasing and indicates high patient acceptance and adherence . Nevertheless , the effect of electronic self-monitoring in patients with bipolar disorder has never been investigated in a r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) . The objective of this trial was to investigate in a RCT whether the use of daily electronic self-monitoring using smartphones reduces depressive and manic symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder . METHOD A total of 78 patients with bipolar disorder according to ICD-10 criteria , aged 18 - 60 years , and with 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ( HAMD-17 ) and Young Mania Rating Scale ( YMRS ) scores ≤17 were r and omized to the use of a smartphone for daily self-monitoring including a clinical feedback loop ( the intervention group ) or to the use of a smartphone for normal communicative purpose s ( the control group ) for 6 months . The primary outcomes were differences in depressive and manic symptoms measured using HAMD-17 and YMRS , respectively , between the intervention and control groups . RESULTS Intention-to-treat analyses using linear mixed models showed no significant effects of daily self-monitoring using smartphones  on depressive as well as manic symptoms . There was a tendency towards more sustained depressive symptoms in the intervention group ( B = 2.02 , 95 % confidence interval -0.13 to 4.17 , p = 0.066 ) . Sub-group analysis among patients without mixed symptoms and patients with presence of depressive and manic symptoms showed significantly more depressive symptoms and fewer manic symptoms during the trial period in the intervention group . CONCLUSIONS These results highlight that electronic self-monitoring , although intuitive and appealing , needs critical consideration and further clarification before it is implemented as a clinical tool BACKGROUND Adjunctive psychosocial interventions are efficacious in bipolar disorder , but their incorporation into routine management plans are often confounded by cost and access constraints . We report here a comparative evaluation of two online programs hosted on a single website ( www.moodswings.net.au ) . A basic version , called MoodSwings ( MS ) , contains psychoeducation material and asynchronous discussion boards ; and a more interactive program , MoodSwings Plus ( MS-Plus ) , combined the basic psychoeducation material and discussion boards with elements of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy . These programs were evaluated in a head-to-head study design . METHOD Participants with Bipolar I or II disorder ( n=156 ) were r and omized to receive either MoodSwings or MoodSwings-Plus .  Outcomes included mood symptoms , the occurrence of relapse , functionality , Locus of Control , social support , quality of life and medication adherence . RESULTS Participants in both groups showed baseline to endpoint reductions in mood symptoms and improvements in functionality , quality of life and medication adherence . The MoodSwings-Plus group showed a greater number of within-group changes on symptoms and functioning in depression and mania , quality of life and social support , across both poles of the illness . MoodSwings-Plus was superior to MoodSwings in improvement on symptoms of mania scores at 12 months ( p=0.02 ) but not on the incidence of recurrence . LIMITATIONS The study did not have an attention control group and therefore could not demonstrate efficacy of the two active arms . There was notable ( 81 % ) attrition by 12 months from baseline . CONCLUSION This study suggests that both CBT and psychoeducation delivered online may have utility in the management of bipolar disorder . They are feasible , readily accepted , and associated with improvement The evaluation of the clinical outcome of patients enrolled in r and omised controlled studies should always be accurate and objective . The methods used to assess and report patients ' results must consequently be indicated a priori in the design of the clinical experimentation . Major ( hard 
    Output:
    
agent
Taken together , the literature presented in this dissertation illustrates that 1 ) smartphone-based electronic self-monitoring of mood  seems to reflect clinical ly assessed depressive and manic symptoms and enables the long-term characterization of mood instability in bipolar disorder ; 2 ) preliminary results suggest that smartphone-based automatically generated data ( e.g. the number of text messages sent/day ; the number of incoming and outgoing calls/day ; the number of changes in cell tower IDs/day ; and voice features ) seem to reflect clinical ly assessed depressive and manic symptoms in bipolar disorder ; 3 ) smartphone-based electronic self-monitoring had no effects on the severity of depressive and manic symptoms in bipolar disorder , according to a r and omized controlled trial ; and 4 ) electronic  monitoring of psychomotor activity and heart rate variability seems to reflect illness activity in bipolar disorder and differentiate between patients with bipolar disorder and healthy control individuals .
These findings point toward the usefulness of  electronic monitoring  as a marker of illness in bipolar disorder .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background In a recent exploratory r and omised trial we found that a novel , internet-based psychoeducation programme for bipolar disorder ( Beating Bipolar ) was relatively easy to deliver and had a modest effect on psychological quality of life . We sought to explore the experiences of participants with respect to feasibility , acceptability and impact of Beating Bipolar . Methods Participants were invited to take part in a semi-structured interview . Thematic analysis techniques were employed ; to explore and describe participants ’ experiences , the data were analysed for emerging themes which were identified and coded . Results The programme was feasible to deliver and acceptable to participants where they felt comfortable using a computer . It was found to impact upon insight into illness , health behaviour , personal routines and positive attitudes towards medication . Many participants regarded the programme as likely to be most beneficial for those recently diagnosed . Conclusions An online psychoeducation package for bipolar disorder , such as Beating Bipolar , is feasible and acceptable to patients , has a positive impact on self-management behaviours and may be particularly suited to early intervention . Alternative ( non-internet ) formats should also be made available to patients Background Patients with bipolar disorder often show decreased adherence with mood stabilizers and frequently interventions on prodromal depressive and manic symptoms are delayed . Recently , the MONARCA I r and omized controlled trial investigated the effect of electronic self-monitoring using smartphones on depressive and manic symptoms . The findings suggested that patients using the MONARCA system had more sustained depressive symptoms than patients using a smartphone for normal communicative purpose s , but had fewer manic symptoms during the trial . It is likely that the ability of these self-monitored measures to detect prodromal symptoms of depression and mania may be insufficient compared to automatically generated objective data on measures of illness activity such as phone usage , social activity , physical activity , and mobility . The Monsenso system , for smartphones integrating subjective and objective measures of illness activity was developed and will be tested in the present trial . Methods The MONARCA II trial uses a r and omized controlled single-blind parallel-group design . Patients with bipolar disorder according to ICD-10 who previously have been treated at the Copenhagen Clinic for Affective Disorder , Denmark are included and r and omized to either daily use of the Monsenso system including an feedback loop between patients and clinicians ( the intervention group ) or to the use of a smartphone for normal communicative purpose s ( the control group ) for a 9-month trial period . The trial was started in September 2014 and recruitment is ongoing . The outcomes are : differences in depressive and manic symptoms ; rate of depressive and manic episodes ( primary ) ; automatically generated objective data on measures of illness activity ; number of days hospitalized ; psychosocial functioning ( secondary ) ; perceived stress ; quality of life ; self-rated depressive symptoms ; self-rated manic symptoms ; recovery ; empowerment and adherence to medication ( tertiary ) between the intervention group and the control group during the trial . Ethical permission has been obtained . Positive , neutral and negative findings will be published . Discussion If the system is effective in reducing depressive and /or manic symptoms ( and other symptoms of bipolar disorder ) and the rate of episodes , there will be basis for extending the use to the treatment of bipolar disorder in general and in larger scale . Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT02221336 . Registered 26th of September 2014 Introduction Electronic self-monitoring of affective symptoms using cell phones is suggested as a practical and inexpensive way to monitor illness activity and identify early signs of affective symptoms . It has never been tested in a r and omised clinical trial whether electronic self-monitoring improves outcomes in bipolar disorder . We are conducting a trial testing the effect of using a Smartphone for self-monitoring in bipolar disorder . Methods We developed the MONARCA application for And roid-based Smartphones , allowing patients suffering from bipolar disorder to do daily self-monitoring — including an interactive feedback loop between patients and clinicians through a web-based interface . The effect of the application was tested in a parallel-group , single-blind r and omised controlled trial so far including 78 patients suffering from bipolar disorder in the age group 18–60 years who were given the use of a Smartphone with the MONARCA application ( intervention group ) or to the use of a cell phone without the application ( placebo group ) during a 6-month study period . The study was carried out from September 2011 . The outcomes were changes in affective symptoms ( primary ) , social functioning , perceived stress , self-rated depressive and manic symptoms , quality of life , adherence to medication , stress and cognitive functioning ( secondary and tertiary ) . Analysis Recruitment is ongoing . Ethics Ethical permission has been obtained . Dissemination Positive , neutral and negative findings of the study will be published . Registration details The trial is approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in The Capital Region of Denmark ( H-2 - 2011 - 056 ) and The Danish Data Protection Agency ( 2013 - 41 - 1710 ) . The trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov as NCT01446406 Background The Internet has potential as a medium for health behavior change programs , but no controlled studies have yet evaluated the impact of a fully automated physical activity intervention over several months with real-time objective feedback from a monitor . Objective The aim was to evaluate the impact of a physical activity program based on the Internet and mobile phone technology provided to individuals for 9 weeks . Methods A single-center , r and omized , stratified controlled trial was conducted from September to December 2005 in Bedfordshire , United Kingdom , with 77 healthy adults whose mean age was 40.4 years ( SD = 7.6 ) and mean body mass index was 26.3 ( SD = 3.4 ) . Participants were r and omized to a test group that had access to an Internet and mobile phone – based physical activity program  ( n = 47 ) or to a control group ( n = 30 ) that  received no support . The test group received tailored solutions for perceived barriers , a schedule to plan weekly exercise sessions with mobile phone and email reminders , a message board to share their experiences with others , and feedback on their level of physical activity . Both groups were issued a wrist-worn accelerometer to monitor their level of physical activity ;  only the test group received real-time feedback via the Internet . The main outcome measures were accelerometer data and self-report of physical activity . Results At the end of the study period , the test group reported a significantly greater increase over baseline than did the control group for perceived control ( P < .001 ) and intention/expectation to exercise ( P < .001 ) . Intent-to-treat analyses of both the accelerometer data ( P = .02 ) and leisure time self-report data ( P = .03 ) found a higher level of moderate physical activity in the test group . The average increase ( over the control group ) in accelerometer-measured moderate physical activity was 2 h 18 min per week . The test group also lost more percent body fat than the control group ( test group : −2.18 , SD = 0.59 ; control group : −0.17 , SD = 0.81 ; P = .04 ) . Conclusions A fully automated Internet and mobile phone – based motivation and action support system can significantly increase and maintain the level of physical activity in healthy adults CONTEXT Despite the availability of efficacious treatments , the long-term course of bipolar disorder is often unfavorable . OBJECTIVE To test the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention program to improve the quality of care and long-term outcomes for persons with bipolar disorder . DESIGN R and omized controlled trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment . SETTING Mental health clinics of a group-model prepaid health plan . PATIENTS Of 785 patients in treatment for bipolar disorder who were invited to participate , 509 attended an evaluation appointment , 450 were found eligible to participate , and 441 enrolled in the trial . INTERVENTIONS Participants were r and omly assigned to a multicomponent intervention program or to continued care as usual . Three nurse care managers provided a 2-year systematic intervention program , including the following : a structured group psychoeducational program , monthly telephone monitoring of mood symptoms and medication adherence , feedback to treating mental health providers , facilitation of appropriate follow-up care , and as-needed outreach and crisis intervention . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES In-person blinded research interviews every 3 months assessed mood symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Examination . Health plan administrative records were used to assess the use and cost of mental health services . RESULTS Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated that the intervention significantly reduced the mean level of mania symptoms ( z = 2.09 , P = .04 ) and the time with significant mania symptoms ( 19.2 vs 24.7 weeks ; F(1 ) = 6.0 , P = .01 ) . There was no significant intervention effect on mean level of depressive symptoms ( z = 0.19 , P = .85 ) or time with significant depressive symptoms ( 47.6 vs 50.7 weeks ; F(1 ) = 0.56 , P = .45 ) . Benefits of the intervention were found only in a subgroup of 343 persons with clinical ly significant mood symptoms  at the baseline assessment . The incremental cost ( adjusted ) of the intervention was 1251 dollars ( 95 % confidence interval , 55 - 2446 dollars ) , including approximately 800 dollars for the intervention program services and an approximate 500 dollars increase in the costs of other mental health services . CONCLUSIONS Population -based systematic care programs can significantly reduce the frequency and severity of mania in bipolar disorder , and cost increases are modest considering the clinical gains . The incorporation of more specific cognitive and behavioral content or more effective medication regimens may be necessary to significantly reduce the symptoms of depression BACKGROUND The number of studies on electronic self-monitoring in affective disorder and other psychiatric disorders is increasing and indicates high patient acceptance and adherence . Nevertheless , the effect of electronic self-monitoring in patients with bipolar disorder has never been investigated in a r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) . The objective of this trial was to investigate in a RCT whether the use of daily electronic self-monitoring using smartphones reduces depressive and manic symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder . METHOD A total of 78 patients with bipolar disorder according to ICD-10 criteria , aged 18 - 60 years , and with 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ( HAMD-17 ) and Young Mania Rating Scale ( YMRS ) scores ≤17 were r and omized to the use of a smartphone for daily self-monitoring including a clinical feedback loop ( the intervention group ) or to the use of a smartphone for normal communicative purpose s ( the control group ) for 6 months . The primary outcomes were differences in depressive and manic symptoms measured using HAMD-17 and YMRS , respectively , between the intervention and control groups . RESULTS Intention-to-treat analyses using linear mixed models showed no significant effects of daily self-monitoring using smartphones  on depressive as well as manic symptoms . There was a tendency towards more sustained depressive symptoms in the intervention group ( B = 2.02 , 95 % confidence interval -0.13 to 4.17 , p = 0.066 ) . Sub-group analysis among patients without mixed symptoms and patients with presence of depressive and manic symptoms showed significantly more depressive symptoms and fewer manic symptoms during the trial period in the intervention group . CONCLUSIONS These results highlight that electronic self-monitoring , although intuitive and appealing , needs critical consideration and further clarification before it is implemented as a clinical tool BACKGROUND Adjunctive psychosocial interventions are efficacious in bipolar disorder , but their incorporation into routine management plans are often confounded by cost and access constraints . We report here a comparative evaluation of two online programs hosted on a single website ( www.moodswings.net.au ) . A basic version , called MoodSwings ( MS ) , contains psychoeducation material and asynchronous discussion boards ; and a more interactive program , MoodSwings Plus ( MS-Plus ) , combined the basic psychoeducation material and discussion boards with elements of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy . These programs were evaluated in a head-to-head study design . METHOD Participants with Bipolar I or II disorder ( n=156 ) were r and omized to receive either MoodSwings or MoodSwings-Plus .  Outcomes included mood symptoms , the occurrence of relapse , functionality , Locus of Control , social support , quality of life and medication adherence . RESULTS Participants in both groups showed baseline to endpoint reductions in mood symptoms and improvements in functionality , quality of life and medication adherence . The MoodSwings-Plus group showed a greater number of within-group changes on symptoms and functioning in depression and mania , quality of life and social support , across both poles of the illness . MoodSwings-Plus was superior to MoodSwings in improvement on symptoms of mania scores at 12 months ( p=0.02 ) but not on the incidence of recurrence . LIMITATIONS The study did not have an attention control group and therefore could not demonstrate efficacy of the two active arms . There was notable ( 81 % ) attrition by 12 months from baseline . CONCLUSION This study suggests that both CBT and psychoeducation delivered online may have utility in the management of bipolar disorder . They are feasible , readily accepted , and associated with improvement The evaluation of the clinical outcome of patients enrolled in r and omised controlled studies should always be accurate and objective . The methods used to assess and report patients ' results must consequently be indicated a priori in the design of the clinical experimentation . Major ( hard 
    Output:
    