human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Although the benefits of antihypertensive treatment in " young " elderly ( under 70 years ) hypertensive patients are well established , the value of treatment in older patients ( 70 - 84 years ) is less clear . The Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension ( STOP-Hypertension ) was a prospect i ve , r and omised , double-blind , intervention study set up to compare the effects of active antihypertensive therapy ( three beta-blockers and one diuretic ) and placebo on the frequency of fatal and non-fatal stroke and myocardial infa rct ion and other cardiovascular death in hypertensive Swedish men and women aged 70 - 84 years . We recruited 1627 patients at 116 health centres throughout Sweden , who were willing to participate , and who met the entry criteria of three separate recordings during a 1-month placebo run-in period of systolic blood pressure between 180 and 230 mm Hg with a diastolic pressure of at least 90 mm Hg , or a diastolic pressure between 105 and 120 mm Hg irrespective of the systolic pressure . The total duration of the study was 65 months and the average time in the study was 25 months . 812 patients were r and omly allocated active treatment and 815 placebo . The mean difference in supine blood pressure between the active treatment and placebo groups at the last follow-up before an endpoint , death , or study termination was 19.5/8.1 mm Hg . Compared with placebo , active treatment significantly reduced the number of primary endpoints ( 94 vs 58 ; p = 0.0031 ) and stroke morbidity and mortality ( 53 vs 29 ; p = 0.0081 ) . Although we did not set out to study an effect on total mortality , we also noted a significantly reduced number of deaths in the active treatment group ( 63 vs 36 ; p = 0.0079 ) . The benefits of treatment were discernible up to age 84 years . We conclude that antihypertensive treatment in hypertensive men and women aged 70 - 84 confers highly significant and clinical ly relevant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as in total mortality BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Few community-based studies have examined the long-term risk of recurrent stroke after an acute first-ever stroke . This study aim ed to determine the absolute and relative risks of a first recurrent stroke over the first 5 years after a first-ever stroke and the predictors of such recurrence in a population -based series of people with first-ever stroke in Perth , Western Australia . METHODS Between February 1989 and August 1990 , all people with a suspected acute stroke or transient ischemic attack of the brain who were resident in a geographically defined region of Perth , Western Australia , with a population of 138 708 people , were registered prospect ively and assessed according to st and ardized diagnostic criteria . Patients were followed up prospect ively at 4 months , 12 months , and 5 years after the index event . RESULTS Three hundred seventy patients with a first-ever stroke were registered , of whom 351 survived > 2 days . Data were available for 98 % of the cohort at 5 years , by which time 199 patients ( 58 % ) had died and 52 ( 15 % ) had experienced a recurrent stroke , 12 ( 23 % ) of which were fatal within 28 days . The 5-year cumulative risk of first recurrent stroke was 22.5 % ( 95 % confidence limits [ CL ] , 16.8 % , 28.1 % ) . The risk of recurrent stroke was greatest in the first 6 months after stroke , at 8.8 % ( 95 % CL , 5.4 % , 12.1 % ) . After adjustment for age and sex , the prognostic factors for recurrent stroke were advanced , but not extreme , age ( 75 to 84 years ) ( hazard ratio [ HR ] , 2.6 ; 95 % CL , 1.1 , 6.2 ) , hemorrhagic index stroke ( HR , 2.1 ; 95 % CL , 0.98 , 4.4 ) , and diabetes mellitus ( HR , 2.1 ; 95 % CL , 0.95 , 4.4 ) . CONCLUSIONS Approximately 1 in 6 survivors ( 15 % ) of a first-ever stroke experience a recurrent stroke over the next 5 years , of which 25 % are fatal within 28 days . The pathological subtype of the recurrent stroke is the same as that of the index stroke in 88 % of cases . The predictors of first recurrent stroke in this study were advanced age , hemorrhagic index stroke , and diabetes mellitus , but numbers of recurrent events were modest . Because the risk of recurrent stroke is highest ( 8.8 % ) in the first 6 months after stroke , strategies for secondary prevention  should be initiated as soon as possible after the index event BACKGROUND Calcium antagonists are a first-line treatment for hypertension . The effectiveness of diltiazem , a non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist , in reducing cardiovascular morbidity or mortality is unclear . We compared the effects of diltiazem with that of diuretics , beta-blockers , or both on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality  in hypertensive patients . METHODS In a prospect i ve , r and omised , open , blinded endpoint study , we enrolled 10,881 patients , aged 50 - 74 years , at health centres in Norway and Sweden , who had diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more . We r and omly assigned patients diltiazem , or diuretics , beta-blockers , or both . The combined primary endpoint was fatal and non-fatal stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , and other cardiovascular death . Analysis was done by intention to treat . FINDINGS Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lowered effectively in the diltiazem and diuretic and beta-blocker groups ( reduction 20.3/18.7 vs 23.3/18.7 mm Hg ; difference in systolic reduction p<0.001 ) . A primary endpoint occurred in 403 patients in the diltiazem group and in 400 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group ( 16.6 vs 16.2 events per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 1.00 [ 95 % CI 0.87 - 1.15 ] , p=0.97 ) . Fatal and non-fatal stroke occurred in 159 patients in the diltiazem group and in 196 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group ( 6.4 vs 7.9 events per 1000 patient-years ; 0.80 [ 0.65 - 0.99 ] , p=0.04 ) and fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion in 183 and 157 patients ( 7.4 vs 6.3 events per 1000 patient-years ; 1.16 [ 0.94 - 1.44 ] , p=0.17 ) . INTERPRETATION Diltiazem was as effective as treatment based on diuretics , beta-blockers , or both in preventing the combined primary endpoint of all stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , and other cardiovascular death To collect background data for a prospect i ve clinical trial of beta-blocking agents in the prevention of deaths after stroke , the long-term prognosis in 60 patients discharged from a stroke unit on beta-blocker therapy  was compared with the outcome in 60 matched patients with stroke but without beta-blockers .  Matching included sex , age , type of stroke , and presence or absence of hypertension and cardiac failure . Thirteen patients ( 22 % ) in the beta-blocker group died during a median followup of 41 months . Of the 60 patients not on beta-blockade at discharge , 21 ( 35 % ) died during a median followup of 36 months . By life-table technique and log-rank test , the relative risk for death was 0.60:1.00 ( p = 0.14 ) . During followup , 12 recurrent strokes were observed in patients on beta-blockers and 19 in patients without beta-blockers ( relative risk 0.57:1.00 ; p = 0.12 ) . It appeared that the reduction in mortality could only marginally be ascribed to fewer deaths from myocardial infa rct ion ; other causes of death were also less frequent in beta-blocker-treated patients . The results emphasize that supplementary information on the effect of beta-blocking agents on mortality after stroke is needed before a larger trial of beta-blocker therapy in patients with manifest cerebrovascular disease can be initiated BACKGROUND Angiotensin-converting-enzyme ( ACE ) inhibitors have been used for more than a decade to treat high blood pressure  , despite the lack of data from r and omised intervention trials to show that such treatment affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality . The Captopril Prevention Project ( CAPPP ) is a r and omised intervention trial to compare the effects of ACE inhibition and conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension . METHODS CAPPP was a prospect i ve , r and omised , open trial with blinded endpoint evaluation . 10,985 patients were enrolled at 536 health centres in Sweden and Finl and . Patients aged 25 - 66 years with a measured diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more on two occasions were r and omly assigned captopril or conventional antihypertensive treatment ( diuretics , beta-blockers ) . Analysis was by intention-to-treat . The primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , stroke , and other cardiovascular deaths . FINDINGS Of 5492 patients assigned captopril and 5493 assigned conventional therapy , 14 and 13 , respectively , were lost to follow-up . Primary endpoint events occurred in 363 patients in the captopril group ( 11.1 per 1000 patient-years ) and 335 in the conventional-treatment group ( 10.2 per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 1.05 [ 95 % CI 0.90 - 1.22 ] , p=0 - 52 ) . Cardiovascular mortality was lower with captopril than with conventional treatment ( 76 vs 95 events ; relative risk 0.77 [ 0.57 - 1 - 04 ] , p=0.092 ) , the rate of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion was similar ( 162 vs 161 ) , but fatal and non-fatal stroke was more common with captopril ( 189 vs 148 ; 1.25 [ 1 - 01 - 1 - 55 ] . p=0.044 ) . INTERPRETATION Captopril and conventional treatment did not differ in efficacy in preventing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality . The difference in stroke risk is probably due to the lower levels of blood pressure obtained initially in previously treated patients r and omised to conventional therapy BACKGROUND Blood pressure reduction achieved with beta-blockers and diuretics is the best recorded intervention to date for prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and death in patients with hypertension . Left ventricular hypertrophy ( LVH ) is a strong independent indicator of risk of cardiovascular morbidity and death . We aim ed to establish whether selective blocking of angiotensin II improves LVH beyond reducing blood pressure and , consequently , reduces cardiovascular morbidity and death . METHODS We did a double-masked , r and omised , parallel-group trial in 9193 participants aged 55 - 80 years with essential hypertension ( sitting blood pressure 160 - 200/95 - 115 mm Hg ) and LVH ascertained by electrocardiography ( ECG ) . We assigned participants once daily losartan-based or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment for at least 4 years and until 1040 patients had a primary cardiovascular event ( death , myocardial infa rct ion , or stroke ) . We used Cox regression analysis to compare regimens . FINDINGS Blood pressure fell by 30.2/16.6 ( SD 18.5/10.1 ) and 29.1/16.8 mm Hg ( 19.2/10.1 ) in the losartan and atenolol groups , respectively . The primary composite endpoint occurred in 508 losartan ( 23.8 per 1000 patient-years ) and 588 atenolol patients ( 27.9 per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 0.87 , 95 % CI 0.77 - 0.98 , p=0.021 ) . 204 losartan and 234 atenolol patients died from cardiovascular disease ( 0.89 , 0.73 - 1.07 , p=0.206 ) ; 232 and 309 , respectively , had fatal or non-fatal stroke ( 0.75 , 0.63 - 0.89 , p=0.001 ) ; and myocardial infa rct ion ( non-fatal and fatal ) occurred in 198 and 188 , respectively ( 1.07 , 0.88 - 1.31 , p=0.491 ) . New-onset diabetes was less frequent with losartan . Inter 
    Output:
    
agent
For other outcomes analysed ( major vascular events , death from all causes , death from cardiovascular causes ) , we observed no significant differences between the groups .
There were minor blood pressure reductions in the intervention group .
To date , no available evidence supports the routine use of beta-blockers for secondary prevention after stroke or TIA .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Although the benefits of antihypertensive treatment in " young " elderly ( under 70 years ) hypertensive patients are well established , the value of treatment in older patients ( 70 - 84 years ) is less clear . The Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension ( STOP-Hypertension ) was a prospect i ve , r and omised , double-blind , intervention study set up to compare the effects of active antihypertensive therapy ( three beta-blockers and one diuretic ) and placebo on the frequency of fatal and non-fatal stroke and myocardial infa rct ion and other cardiovascular death in hypertensive Swedish men and women aged 70 - 84 years . We recruited 1627 patients at 116 health centres throughout Sweden , who were willing to participate , and who met the entry criteria of three separate recordings during a 1-month placebo run-in period of systolic blood pressure between 180 and 230 mm Hg with a diastolic pressure of at least 90 mm Hg , or a diastolic pressure between 105 and 120 mm Hg irrespective of the systolic pressure . The total duration of the study was 65 months and the average time in the study was 25 months . 812 patients were r and omly allocated active treatment and 815 placebo . The mean difference in supine blood pressure between the active treatment and placebo groups at the last follow-up before an endpoint , death , or study termination was 19.5/8.1 mm Hg . Compared with placebo , active treatment significantly reduced the number of primary endpoints ( 94 vs 58 ; p = 0.0031 ) and stroke morbidity and mortality ( 53 vs 29 ; p = 0.0081 ) . Although we did not set out to study an effect on total mortality , we also noted a significantly reduced number of deaths in the active treatment group ( 63 vs 36 ; p = 0.0079 ) . The benefits of treatment were discernible up to age 84 years . We conclude that antihypertensive treatment in hypertensive men and women aged 70 - 84 confers highly significant and clinical ly relevant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as in total mortality BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Few community-based studies have examined the long-term risk of recurrent stroke after an acute first-ever stroke . This study aim ed to determine the absolute and relative risks of a first recurrent stroke over the first 5 years after a first-ever stroke and the predictors of such recurrence in a population -based series of people with first-ever stroke in Perth , Western Australia . METHODS Between February 1989 and August 1990 , all people with a suspected acute stroke or transient ischemic attack of the brain who were resident in a geographically defined region of Perth , Western Australia , with a population of 138 708 people , were registered prospect ively and assessed according to st and ardized diagnostic criteria . Patients were followed up prospect ively at 4 months , 12 months , and 5 years after the index event . RESULTS Three hundred seventy patients with a first-ever stroke were registered , of whom 351 survived > 2 days . Data were available for 98 % of the cohort at 5 years , by which time 199 patients ( 58 % ) had died and 52 ( 15 % ) had experienced a recurrent stroke , 12 ( 23 % ) of which were fatal within 28 days . The 5-year cumulative risk of first recurrent stroke was 22.5 % ( 95 % confidence limits [ CL ] , 16.8 % , 28.1 % ) . The risk of recurrent stroke was greatest in the first 6 months after stroke , at 8.8 % ( 95 % CL , 5.4 % , 12.1 % ) . After adjustment for age and sex , the prognostic factors for recurrent stroke were advanced , but not extreme , age ( 75 to 84 years ) ( hazard ratio [ HR ] , 2.6 ; 95 % CL , 1.1 , 6.2 ) , hemorrhagic index stroke ( HR , 2.1 ; 95 % CL , 0.98 , 4.4 ) , and diabetes mellitus ( HR , 2.1 ; 95 % CL , 0.95 , 4.4 ) . CONCLUSIONS Approximately 1 in 6 survivors ( 15 % ) of a first-ever stroke experience a recurrent stroke over the next 5 years , of which 25 % are fatal within 28 days . The pathological subtype of the recurrent stroke is the same as that of the index stroke in 88 % of cases . The predictors of first recurrent stroke in this study were advanced age , hemorrhagic index stroke , and diabetes mellitus , but numbers of recurrent events were modest . Because the risk of recurrent stroke is highest ( 8.8 % ) in the first 6 months after stroke , strategies for secondary prevention  should be initiated as soon as possible after the index event BACKGROUND Calcium antagonists are a first-line treatment for hypertension . The effectiveness of diltiazem , a non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist , in reducing cardiovascular morbidity or mortality is unclear . We compared the effects of diltiazem with that of diuretics , beta-blockers , or both on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality  in hypertensive patients . METHODS In a prospect i ve , r and omised , open , blinded endpoint study , we enrolled 10,881 patients , aged 50 - 74 years , at health centres in Norway and Sweden , who had diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more . We r and omly assigned patients diltiazem , or diuretics , beta-blockers , or both . The combined primary endpoint was fatal and non-fatal stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , and other cardiovascular death . Analysis was done by intention to treat . FINDINGS Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lowered effectively in the diltiazem and diuretic and beta-blocker groups ( reduction 20.3/18.7 vs 23.3/18.7 mm Hg ; difference in systolic reduction p<0.001 ) . A primary endpoint occurred in 403 patients in the diltiazem group and in 400 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group ( 16.6 vs 16.2 events per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 1.00 [ 95 % CI 0.87 - 1.15 ] , p=0.97 ) . Fatal and non-fatal stroke occurred in 159 patients in the diltiazem group and in 196 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group ( 6.4 vs 7.9 events per 1000 patient-years ; 0.80 [ 0.65 - 0.99 ] , p=0.04 ) and fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion in 183 and 157 patients ( 7.4 vs 6.3 events per 1000 patient-years ; 1.16 [ 0.94 - 1.44 ] , p=0.17 ) . INTERPRETATION Diltiazem was as effective as treatment based on diuretics , beta-blockers , or both in preventing the combined primary endpoint of all stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , and other cardiovascular death To collect background data for a prospect i ve clinical trial of beta-blocking agents in the prevention of deaths after stroke , the long-term prognosis in 60 patients discharged from a stroke unit on beta-blocker therapy  was compared with the outcome in 60 matched patients with stroke but without beta-blockers .  Matching included sex , age , type of stroke , and presence or absence of hypertension and cardiac failure . Thirteen patients ( 22 % ) in the beta-blocker group died during a median followup of 41 months . Of the 60 patients not on beta-blockade at discharge , 21 ( 35 % ) died during a median followup of 36 months . By life-table technique and log-rank test , the relative risk for death was 0.60:1.00 ( p = 0.14 ) . During followup , 12 recurrent strokes were observed in patients on beta-blockers and 19 in patients without beta-blockers ( relative risk 0.57:1.00 ; p = 0.12 ) . It appeared that the reduction in mortality could only marginally be ascribed to fewer deaths from myocardial infa rct ion ; other causes of death were also less frequent in beta-blocker-treated patients . The results emphasize that supplementary information on the effect of beta-blocking agents on mortality after stroke is needed before a larger trial of beta-blocker therapy in patients with manifest cerebrovascular disease can be initiated BACKGROUND Angiotensin-converting-enzyme ( ACE ) inhibitors have been used for more than a decade to treat high blood pressure  , despite the lack of data from r and omised intervention trials to show that such treatment affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality . The Captopril Prevention Project ( CAPPP ) is a r and omised intervention trial to compare the effects of ACE inhibition and conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension . METHODS CAPPP was a prospect i ve , r and omised , open trial with blinded endpoint evaluation . 10,985 patients were enrolled at 536 health centres in Sweden and Finl and . Patients aged 25 - 66 years with a measured diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more on two occasions were r and omly assigned captopril or conventional antihypertensive treatment ( diuretics , beta-blockers ) . Analysis was by intention-to-treat . The primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , stroke , and other cardiovascular deaths . FINDINGS Of 5492 patients assigned captopril and 5493 assigned conventional therapy , 14 and 13 , respectively , were lost to follow-up . Primary endpoint events occurred in 363 patients in the captopril group ( 11.1 per 1000 patient-years ) and 335 in the conventional-treatment group ( 10.2 per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 1.05 [ 95 % CI 0.90 - 1.22 ] , p=0 - 52 ) . Cardiovascular mortality was lower with captopril than with conventional treatment ( 76 vs 95 events ; relative risk 0.77 [ 0.57 - 1 - 04 ] , p=0.092 ) , the rate of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion was similar ( 162 vs 161 ) , but fatal and non-fatal stroke was more common with captopril ( 189 vs 148 ; 1.25 [ 1 - 01 - 1 - 55 ] . p=0.044 ) . INTERPRETATION Captopril and conventional treatment did not differ in efficacy in preventing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality . The difference in stroke risk is probably due to the lower levels of blood pressure obtained initially in previously treated patients r and omised to conventional therapy BACKGROUND Blood pressure reduction achieved with beta-blockers and diuretics is the best recorded intervention to date for prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and death in patients with hypertension . Left ventricular hypertrophy ( LVH ) is a strong independent indicator of risk of cardiovascular morbidity and death . We aim ed to establish whether selective blocking of angiotensin II improves LVH beyond reducing blood pressure and , consequently , reduces cardiovascular morbidity and death . METHODS We did a double-masked , r and omised , parallel-group trial in 9193 participants aged 55 - 80 years with essential hypertension ( sitting blood pressure 160 - 200/95 - 115 mm Hg ) and LVH ascertained by electrocardiography ( ECG ) . We assigned participants once daily losartan-based or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment for at least 4 years and until 1040 patients had a primary cardiovascular event ( death , myocardial infa rct ion , or stroke ) . We used Cox regression analysis to compare regimens . FINDINGS Blood pressure fell by 30.2/16.6 ( SD 18.5/10.1 ) and 29.1/16.8 mm Hg ( 19.2/10.1 ) in the losartan and atenolol groups , respectively . The primary composite endpoint occurred in 508 losartan ( 23.8 per 1000 patient-years ) and 588 atenolol patients ( 27.9 per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 0.87 , 95 % CI 0.77 - 0.98 , p=0.021 ) . 204 losartan and 234 atenolol patients died from cardiovascular disease ( 0.89 , 0.73 - 1.07 , p=0.206 ) ; 232 and 309 , respectively , had fatal or non-fatal stroke ( 0.75 , 0.63 - 0.89 , p=0.001 ) ; and myocardial infa rct ion ( non-fatal and fatal ) occurred in 198 and 188 , respectively ( 1.07 , 0.88 - 1.31 , p=0.491 ) . New-onset diabetes was less frequent with losartan . Inter 
    Output:
    