human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Objective . To investigate the effect of 2 different species of probiotics in preventing infections in infants attending child care centers . Methods . A double-blind , placebo-controlled , r and omized trial was conducted from December 1 , 2000 , to September 30 , 2002 , at 14 child care centers in the Beer-Sheva area of Israel in healthy term infants 4 to 10 months old . Infants were assigned r and omly to formula supplemented with Bifidobacterium lactis ( BB-12 ) , Lactobacillus reuteri ( American Type Culture Collection 55730 ) , or no probiotics . Duration of feeding , including follow-up , for each participant was 12 weeks . All infants were fed only the assigned formula and were not breastfed due to parental decision before recruitment to the study . Probiotic or prebiotic food products or supplements were not allowed . Main outcome measures were number of days and number of episodes with fever ( > 38 ° C ) and number of days and number of episodes with diarrhea or respiratory illness . Results . Participants ( n = 201 ) were similar regarding gestational age , birth weight , gender , and previous breastfeeding . The controls ( n = 60 ) , compared with those fed B lactis ( n = 73 ) or L reuteri ( n = 68 ) , had significantly more febrile episodes ( mean [ 95 % confidence interval ] : 0.41 [ 0.28–0.54 ] vs 0.27 [ 0.17–0.37 ] vs 0.11 [ 0.04–0.18 ] , respectively ) . The controls also had more diarrhea episodes ( 0.31 [ 0.22–0.40 ] vs 0.13 [ 0.05–0.21 ] vs 0.02 [ 0.01–0.05 ] , respectively ) and episodes of longer duration ( 0.59 [ 0.34–0.84 ] vs 0.37 [ 0.08–0.66 ] vs 0.15 [ 0.12–0.18 ] days , respectively ) . The L reuteri group , compared with BB-12 or controls , had a significant decrease of number of days with fever , clinic visits , child care absences , and antibiotic prescriptions . Rate and duration of respiratory illnesses did not differ significantly between groups . Conclusions . Child care infants fed a formula supplemented with L reuteri or B lactis had fewer and shorter episodes of diarrhea , with no effect on respiratory illnesses . These effects were more prominent with L reuteri , which was also the only supplement to improve additional morbidity parameters The addition of probiotics to infant formula has been shown to be an efficient way to increase the number of beneficial bacteria in the intestine in order to promote a gut flora resembling that of breast-fed infants . The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety and tolerance of a combination of two probiotic strains in early infancy . A group of 126 newborns were r and omised to receive a prebiotic-containing starter formula supplemented with Lactobacillus paracasei ssp . paracasei and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp . lactis or the same formula without probiotics for the first 3 months of life . A total of eighty infants continued the study until they were aged 6 months .  Growth measurements were taken monthly at healthy baby clinics . Diaries were used to monitor behaviour , infections , use of antibiotics , as well as stool characteristics . Normal growth occurred in all infants and no statistically significant differences were detected between the probiotics group and the control group for gain in weight , length and head circumference . Infants in the probiotics group produced softer and more frequent stools during the first 3 months of life . No differences were found in crying and sleeping hours , number of parent-diagnosed infections , antibiotic use , visits to the general practitioner and number of adverse events . The use of a prebiotic-containing starter formula supplemented with L. paracasei ssp . paracasei and B. animalis ssp . lactis in early infancy is safe , well tolerated and has no adverse effects on growth and infant behaviour A mixture of neutral short chain galactooligosaccharides and long chain fructo-oligosaccharides ( scGOS/lcFOS ) has been shown to have prebiotic and immunomodulatory effects comparable to human milk oligosaccharides . This can be translated into clinical practice as a potential to prevent infections and allergy . The hypothesis of this study was that this specific prebiotic mixture could have a preventive effect against infections during the first 6 mo of life . In a prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial , healthy term infants with a parental history of atopy were fed either prebiotic-supplemented ( 8 g/L scGOS/lcFOS ) or placebo-supplemented ( 8 g/L maltodextrin ) hypoallergenic formula during the first 6 mo of life . The primary outcome measures were infectious episodes , number of infections requiring antibiotics , and incidence of infections . During the study period , infants in the scGOS/lcFOS group had fewer episodes of all types of infections combined ( P = 0.01 ) . They also tended to have fewer upper respiratory tract infection episodes ( P = 0.07 ) and fewer infections requiring antibiotic treatment ( P = 0.10 ) . Similarly , the cumulative incidence of recurring infections was significantly lower in the scGOS/lcFOS group . The cumulative incidence of any recurring infection and recurring respiratory infections was 3.9 and 2.9 % in the scGOS/lcFOS group and 13.5 and 9.6 % in the placebo group , respectively ( P < 0.05 ) . Oligosaccharide prebiotics reduced the number of infectious episodes and the incidence of recurring , particularly respiratory , infections during the first 6 mo of life . Although the exact mechanism of action is under investigation , it is very likely that the immune modulating effect of this prebiotic mixture through intestinal flora modification is the principal mechanism for the observed infection prevention early in life BACKGROUND Probiotics and prebiotics are considered to be beneficial to the gastrointestinal health of infants . OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate infant formulas containing probiotics and synbiotics ( combinations of probiotics and prebiotics ) for safety and tolerance . DESIGN In a prospect i ve , controlled , double-blind , r and omized trial , healthy full-term infants were exclusively fed a control formula or study formulas containing Bifidobacterium longum BL999 ( BL999 ) + Lactobacillus rhamnosus LPR ( LPR ) , BL999 + LPR + 4 g/L of 90 % galactooligosaccharide/10 % short-chain fructooligosaccharide ( GOS/SCFOS ) , or BL999 + Lactobacillus paracasei ST11 ( ST11 ) + 4 g/L GOS/SCFOS from < or = 2 to 16 wk of age ( treatment period ) . Safety and tolerance were assessed based on weight gain during the treatment period ( primary outcome ) as well as recumbent length , head circumference , digestive tolerance , and adverse events ( secondary outcomes ) , which were evaluated at 2 , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , and 52 wk of age . RESULTS Two hundred eighty-four infants were enrolled . During the treatment period , difference in mean weight gain between control and study formula groups in both the intention-to-treat and per- protocol population s were within the predefined equivalence boundaries of + /-3.9 g/d , indicating equivalent weight gain . Secondary outcomes did not show significant differences between groups during the treatment period . CONCLUSION Infants fed formulas containing probiotics or synbiotics show a similar rate in weight gain compared with those fed a control formula and tolerate these formulas well A mixture of neutral short-chain galactooligosaccharides ( scGOS ) and long-chain fructooligosaccharides ( lcFOS ) has been shown to reduce the incidence of atopic dermatitis ( AD ) and infectious episodes during the first 6 mo of life . This dual protection occurred through the intervention period . The present study evaluated if these protective effects were lasting beyond the intervention period . In a prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled design , healthy term infants with a parental history of atopy were fed either a prebiotic-supplemented ( 8 g/L scGOS/lcFOS ) or placebo-supplemented ( 8 g/L maltodextrin ) hypoallergenic formula during the first 6 mo of life . Following this intervention period , blind follow-up continued until 2 y of life . Primary endpoints were cumulative incidence of allergic manifestations . Secondary endpoints were number of infectious episodes and growth .  Of 152 participants , 134 infants ( 68 in placebo , 66 in intervention group ) completed the follow-up . During this period , infants in the scGOS/lcFOS group had significantly lower incidence of allergic manifestations . Cumulative incidences for AD , recurrent wheezing , and allergic urticaria were higher in the placebo group , ( 27.9 , 20.6 , and 10.3 % , respectively ) than in the intervention group ( 13.6 , 7.6 , and 1.5 % ) ( P < 0.05 ) . Infants in the scGOS/lcFOS group had fewer episodes of physician-diagnosed overall and upper respiratory tract infections ( P < 0.01 ) , fever episodes ( P < 0.00001 ) , and fewer antibiotic prescriptions ( P < 0.05 ) . Growth was normal and similar in both groups . Early dietary intervention with oligosaccharide prebiotics has a protective effect against both allergic manifestations and infections . The observed dual protection lasting beyond the intervention period suggests that an immune modulating effect through the intestinal flora modification may be the principal mechanism of action BACKGROUND Nonpathogenic live bacteria are consumed as food by many children , particularly in the form of yogurt . The tolerance and safety of long-term consumption of specific types and strains of probiotic bacteria are not well documented . OBJECTIVE The goal was to evaluate tolerance to formulas containing 2 levels of probiotic supplementation and effects on growth , general clinical status , and intestinal health in free-living healthy infants . DESIGN This was a prospect i ve , double-blind , r and omized , placebo-controlled study of healthy infants aged 3 - 24 mo . Infants were assigned to receive a st and ard milk-based formula containing 1 x 10(7 ) colony-forming units (CFU)/g each of Bifidobacterium lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus , formula containing 1 x 10(6 ) CFU/g each of B. lactis and S. thermophilus , or unsupplemented formula . Clinical outcomes included formula intake , gastrointestinal tolerance , anthropometric measures , daycare attendance , and history of illness . RESULTS One hundred eighteen infants aged ( + /- SD ) 7.0 + /- 2.9 mo at enrollment consumed formula for 210 + /- 127 d. There were no significant differences in age , sex , formula consumption , or length of study between groups . The supplemented formulas were well accepted and were associated with a lower frequency of reported colic or irritability ( P < 0.001 ) and a lower frequency of antibiotic use ( P < 0.001 ) than was the unsupplemented formula . There were no significant differences between groups in growth , health care attention seeking , daycare absenteeism , or other health variables . CONCLUSION Long-term consumption of formulas supplemented with B. lactis and S. thermophilus was well tolerated and safe and result ed in adequate growth , reduced reporting of colic or irritability , and a lower frequency of antibiotic use Adding prebiotics or probiotics to infant formula to improve the intestinal flora of formula-fed infants is considered to be a major innovation . Several companies have brought relevant formulations onto the market . However , comparative data on the effects of pre- and probiotics on the intestinal microflora of infants are not available . The present study aim ed to compare the effects of infant formula containing a mixture of galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides or viable Bifidobacterium animalis on the composition and metabolic activity of the intestinal microflora . Before birth , infants were r and omised and double blindly allocated to one of three formulas . The prebiotic ( GOS/FOS ) group ( n 19 ) received regular infant formula supplemented with a mixture of galacto-oligosaccharides and fructo-oligosaccharides ( 6 g/l ) . The probiotic ( Bb-12 ) group ( n 19 ) received the same formula supplemented with 6.0x10(10 ) viable cells of B. animalis per litre . The st and ard group ( n 19 ) received non-supplemented regular formula .  A group of sixty-three breast-fed infants was included as a reference group . Faecal sample s were taken at postnatal day 5 and 10 , and week 4 , 8 , 12 and 16 . Compared with the groups fed Bb-12 and st and ard formula , the GOS/FOS formula group showed higher faecal acetate ratio ( 69.7 % ( sem 2.7 ) , 69.9 % ( sem 3.9 ) and 82.2 % ( sem 5 
    Output:
    
agent
Synbiotics failed to significantly increase growth in boys and girls .
Use of synbiotics increased stool frequency , had no impact on stool consistency , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Probiotics in formula also failed to have any significant effect on growth , stool frequency or consistency .
Probiotics did not lower the incidence of diarrhoea , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Prebiotics in formula did increase weight gain but had no impact on length or head circumference gain .
Prebiotics increased stool frequency but had no impact on stool consistency , the incidence of colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
There was no impact of prebiotics on the volume of formula tolerated , infections and gastrointestinal microflora .
Authors ’ conclusions There is not enough evidence to state that supplementation of term infant formula with synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics does result in improved growth or clinical outcomes in term infants .
There is no data available to establish if synbiotics are superior to probiotics or prebiotics
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Objective . To investigate the effect of 2 different species of probiotics in preventing infections in infants attending child care centers . Methods . A double-blind , placebo-controlled , r and omized trial was conducted from December 1 , 2000 , to September 30 , 2002 , at 14 child care centers in the Beer-Sheva area of Israel in healthy term infants 4 to 10 months old . Infants were assigned r and omly to formula supplemented with Bifidobacterium lactis ( BB-12 ) , Lactobacillus reuteri ( American Type Culture Collection 55730 ) , or no probiotics . Duration of feeding , including follow-up , for each participant was 12 weeks . All infants were fed only the assigned formula and were not breastfed due to parental decision before recruitment to the study . Probiotic or prebiotic food products or supplements were not allowed . Main outcome measures were number of days and number of episodes with fever ( > 38 ° C ) and number of days and number of episodes with diarrhea or respiratory illness . Results . Participants ( n = 201 ) were similar regarding gestational age , birth weight , gender , and previous breastfeeding . The controls ( n = 60 ) , compared with those fed B lactis ( n = 73 ) or L reuteri ( n = 68 ) , had significantly more febrile episodes ( mean [ 95 % confidence interval ] : 0.41 [ 0.28–0.54 ] vs 0.27 [ 0.17–0.37 ] vs 0.11 [ 0.04–0.18 ] , respectively ) . The controls also had more diarrhea episodes ( 0.31 [ 0.22–0.40 ] vs 0.13 [ 0.05–0.21 ] vs 0.02 [ 0.01–0.05 ] , respectively ) and episodes of longer duration ( 0.59 [ 0.34–0.84 ] vs 0.37 [ 0.08–0.66 ] vs 0.15 [ 0.12–0.18 ] days , respectively ) . The L reuteri group , compared with BB-12 or controls , had a significant decrease of number of days with fever , clinic visits , child care absences , and antibiotic prescriptions . Rate and duration of respiratory illnesses did not differ significantly between groups . Conclusions . Child care infants fed a formula supplemented with L reuteri or B lactis had fewer and shorter episodes of diarrhea , with no effect on respiratory illnesses . These effects were more prominent with L reuteri , which was also the only supplement to improve additional morbidity parameters The addition of probiotics to infant formula has been shown to be an efficient way to increase the number of beneficial bacteria in the intestine in order to promote a gut flora resembling that of breast-fed infants . The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety and tolerance of a combination of two probiotic strains in early infancy . A group of 126 newborns were r and omised to receive a prebiotic-containing starter formula supplemented with Lactobacillus paracasei ssp . paracasei and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp . lactis or the same formula without probiotics for the first 3 months of life . A total of eighty infants continued the study until they were aged 6 months .  Growth measurements were taken monthly at healthy baby clinics . Diaries were used to monitor behaviour , infections , use of antibiotics , as well as stool characteristics . Normal growth occurred in all infants and no statistically significant differences were detected between the probiotics group and the control group for gain in weight , length and head circumference . Infants in the probiotics group produced softer and more frequent stools during the first 3 months of life . No differences were found in crying and sleeping hours , number of parent-diagnosed infections , antibiotic use , visits to the general practitioner and number of adverse events . The use of a prebiotic-containing starter formula supplemented with L. paracasei ssp . paracasei and B. animalis ssp . lactis in early infancy is safe , well tolerated and has no adverse effects on growth and infant behaviour A mixture of neutral short chain galactooligosaccharides and long chain fructo-oligosaccharides ( scGOS/lcFOS ) has been shown to have prebiotic and immunomodulatory effects comparable to human milk oligosaccharides . This can be translated into clinical practice as a potential to prevent infections and allergy . The hypothesis of this study was that this specific prebiotic mixture could have a preventive effect against infections during the first 6 mo of life . In a prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial , healthy term infants with a parental history of atopy were fed either prebiotic-supplemented ( 8 g/L scGOS/lcFOS ) or placebo-supplemented ( 8 g/L maltodextrin ) hypoallergenic formula during the first 6 mo of life . The primary outcome measures were infectious episodes , number of infections requiring antibiotics , and incidence of infections . During the study period , infants in the scGOS/lcFOS group had fewer episodes of all types of infections combined ( P = 0.01 ) . They also tended to have fewer upper respiratory tract infection episodes ( P = 0.07 ) and fewer infections requiring antibiotic treatment ( P = 0.10 ) . Similarly , the cumulative incidence of recurring infections was significantly lower in the scGOS/lcFOS group . The cumulative incidence of any recurring infection and recurring respiratory infections was 3.9 and 2.9 % in the scGOS/lcFOS group and 13.5 and 9.6 % in the placebo group , respectively ( P < 0.05 ) . Oligosaccharide prebiotics reduced the number of infectious episodes and the incidence of recurring , particularly respiratory , infections during the first 6 mo of life . Although the exact mechanism of action is under investigation , it is very likely that the immune modulating effect of this prebiotic mixture through intestinal flora modification is the principal mechanism for the observed infection prevention early in life BACKGROUND Probiotics and prebiotics are considered to be beneficial to the gastrointestinal health of infants . OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate infant formulas containing probiotics and synbiotics ( combinations of probiotics and prebiotics ) for safety and tolerance . DESIGN In a prospect i ve , controlled , double-blind , r and omized trial , healthy full-term infants were exclusively fed a control formula or study formulas containing Bifidobacterium longum BL999 ( BL999 ) + Lactobacillus rhamnosus LPR ( LPR ) , BL999 + LPR + 4 g/L of 90 % galactooligosaccharide/10 % short-chain fructooligosaccharide ( GOS/SCFOS ) , or BL999 + Lactobacillus paracasei ST11 ( ST11 ) + 4 g/L GOS/SCFOS from < or = 2 to 16 wk of age ( treatment period ) . Safety and tolerance were assessed based on weight gain during the treatment period ( primary outcome ) as well as recumbent length , head circumference , digestive tolerance , and adverse events ( secondary outcomes ) , which were evaluated at 2 , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , and 52 wk of age . RESULTS Two hundred eighty-four infants were enrolled . During the treatment period , difference in mean weight gain between control and study formula groups in both the intention-to-treat and per- protocol population s were within the predefined equivalence boundaries of + /-3.9 g/d , indicating equivalent weight gain . Secondary outcomes did not show significant differences between groups during the treatment period . CONCLUSION Infants fed formulas containing probiotics or synbiotics show a similar rate in weight gain compared with those fed a control formula and tolerate these formulas well A mixture of neutral short-chain galactooligosaccharides ( scGOS ) and long-chain fructooligosaccharides ( lcFOS ) has been shown to reduce the incidence of atopic dermatitis ( AD ) and infectious episodes during the first 6 mo of life . This dual protection occurred through the intervention period . The present study evaluated if these protective effects were lasting beyond the intervention period . In a prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled design , healthy term infants with a parental history of atopy were fed either a prebiotic-supplemented ( 8 g/L scGOS/lcFOS ) or placebo-supplemented ( 8 g/L maltodextrin ) hypoallergenic formula during the first 6 mo of life . Following this intervention period , blind follow-up continued until 2 y of life . Primary endpoints were cumulative incidence of allergic manifestations . Secondary endpoints were number of infectious episodes and growth .  Of 152 participants , 134 infants ( 68 in placebo , 66 in intervention group ) completed the follow-up . During this period , infants in the scGOS/lcFOS group had significantly lower incidence of allergic manifestations . Cumulative incidences for AD , recurrent wheezing , and allergic urticaria were higher in the placebo group , ( 27.9 , 20.6 , and 10.3 % , respectively ) than in the intervention group ( 13.6 , 7.6 , and 1.5 % ) ( P < 0.05 ) . Infants in the scGOS/lcFOS group had fewer episodes of physician-diagnosed overall and upper respiratory tract infections ( P < 0.01 ) , fever episodes ( P < 0.00001 ) , and fewer antibiotic prescriptions ( P < 0.05 ) . Growth was normal and similar in both groups . Early dietary intervention with oligosaccharide prebiotics has a protective effect against both allergic manifestations and infections . The observed dual protection lasting beyond the intervention period suggests that an immune modulating effect through the intestinal flora modification may be the principal mechanism of action BACKGROUND Nonpathogenic live bacteria are consumed as food by many children , particularly in the form of yogurt . The tolerance and safety of long-term consumption of specific types and strains of probiotic bacteria are not well documented . OBJECTIVE The goal was to evaluate tolerance to formulas containing 2 levels of probiotic supplementation and effects on growth , general clinical status , and intestinal health in free-living healthy infants . DESIGN This was a prospect i ve , double-blind , r and omized , placebo-controlled study of healthy infants aged 3 - 24 mo . Infants were assigned to receive a st and ard milk-based formula containing 1 x 10(7 ) colony-forming units (CFU)/g each of Bifidobacterium lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus , formula containing 1 x 10(6 ) CFU/g each of B. lactis and S. thermophilus , or unsupplemented formula . Clinical outcomes included formula intake , gastrointestinal tolerance , anthropometric measures , daycare attendance , and history of illness . RESULTS One hundred eighteen infants aged ( + /- SD ) 7.0 + /- 2.9 mo at enrollment consumed formula for 210 + /- 127 d. There were no significant differences in age , sex , formula consumption , or length of study between groups . The supplemented formulas were well accepted and were associated with a lower frequency of reported colic or irritability ( P < 0.001 ) and a lower frequency of antibiotic use ( P < 0.001 ) than was the unsupplemented formula . There were no significant differences between groups in growth , health care attention seeking , daycare absenteeism , or other health variables . CONCLUSION Long-term consumption of formulas supplemented with B. lactis and S. thermophilus was well tolerated and safe and result ed in adequate growth , reduced reporting of colic or irritability , and a lower frequency of antibiotic use Adding prebiotics or probiotics to infant formula to improve the intestinal flora of formula-fed infants is considered to be a major innovation . Several companies have brought relevant formulations onto the market . However , comparative data on the effects of pre- and probiotics on the intestinal microflora of infants are not available . The present study aim ed to compare the effects of infant formula containing a mixture of galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides or viable Bifidobacterium animalis on the composition and metabolic activity of the intestinal microflora . Before birth , infants were r and omised and double blindly allocated to one of three formulas . The prebiotic ( GOS/FOS ) group ( n 19 ) received regular infant formula supplemented with a mixture of galacto-oligosaccharides and fructo-oligosaccharides ( 6 g/l ) . The probiotic ( Bb-12 ) group ( n 19 ) received the same formula supplemented with 6.0x10(10 ) viable cells of B. animalis per litre . The st and ard group ( n 19 ) received non-supplemented regular formula .  A group of sixty-three breast-fed infants was included as a reference group . Faecal sample s were taken at postnatal day 5 and 10 , and week 4 , 8 , 12 and 16 . Compared with the groups fed Bb-12 and st and ard formula , the GOS/FOS formula group showed higher faecal acetate ratio ( 69.7 % ( sem 2.7 ) , 69.9 % ( sem 3.9 ) and 82.2 % ( sem 5 
    Output:
    