human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background — Secondary prevention by risk factor modification improves patient outcomes , yet it is often not achieved in clinical practice . Reasons for failure stem from challenges of prioritizing risk factor reduction and engaging patients in changing their behaviors . We hypothesize that a novel telemedicine intervention with tailored patient education could improve cardiovascular risk factors . Methods — To evaluate this intervention , we propose enrolling 450 patients with a recent myocardial infa rct ion and hypertension into a 3-arm r and omized , controlled trial . The first arm ( n=150 ) will receive home blood pressure ( BP ) monitors plus a nurse-delivered , telephone-based tailored patient education intervention and will be enrolled into HealthVault , a Microsoft electronic health record platform . The second arm ( n=150 ) will also receive BP monitors plus a tailored patient education intervention and be enrolled in HeartVault . However , the patient education intervention will be delivered by a Web-based program and will cover topics identical to those in the nurse-delivered intervention . Both arms will be compared with a control group receiving st and ard care ( n=150 ) . All participants will have an in-person assessment at baseline and at completion of the study , including st and ardized measurements of BP , LDL cholesterol , and glycosylated hemoglobin ( in diabetic subjects ) . The study design will allow assessment of a telephone-based , nurse-administered disease management program versus st and ard care . The main outcome of interest is the reduction in systolic BP in each intervention group compared with the control group at 12 months . Secondary outcomes assessed will include reductions in LDL cholesterol , body weight , and glycosylated hemoglobin , as well as adherence to evidence -based therapies and improvement in health behaviors . Conclusion — If successful in optimizing BP control , managing other coronary heart disease risk factors , and demonstrating a lower cost , the Web-based disease management tool has the potential to enhance coronary artery disease management , quality of care , and ultimately , patient outcomes . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00901277 Of 22 r and omized trials of rehabilitation with exercise  after myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) , one trial had results that achieved conventional statistical significance . To determine whether or not these studies , in the aggregate , show a significant benefit of rehabilitation after myocardial infa rct ion , we performed an overview of all r and omized trials , involving 4,554 patients ; we evaluated total and cardiovascular mortality , sudden death , and fatal and nonfatal reinfa rct ion . For each endpoint , we calculated an odds ratio ( OR ) and 95 % confidence interval ( 95 % CI ) for the trials combined . After an average of 3 years of follow-up , the ORs were significantly lower in the rehabilitation than in the comparison group : specifically , total mortality ( OR = 0.80 [ 0.66 , 0.96 ] ) , cardiovascular mortality ( OR = 0.78 [ 0.63 , 0.96 ] ) , and fatal reinfa rct ion ( OR = 0.75 [ 0.59 , 0.95 ] ) . The OR for sudden death was significantly lower in the rehabilitation than in the comparison group at 1 year ( OR = 0.63 [ 0.41 , 0.97 ] ) . The data were compatible with a benefit at 2 ( OR = 0.76 [ 0.54 , 1.06 ] ) and 3 years ( OR = 0.92 [ 0.69 , 1.23 ] ) , but these findings were not statistically significant . For nonfatal reinfa rct ion , there were no significant differences between the two groups after 1 ( OR = 1.09 [ 0.76 , 1.57 ] ) , 2 ( OR = 1.10 [ 0.82 , 1.47 ] ) , or 3 years ( OR = 1.09 [ 0.88 , 1.34 ] ) of follow-up . The observed 20 % reduction in overall mortality reflects a decreased risk of cardiovascular mortality and fatal reinfa rct ion throughout at least 3 years and a reduction in sudden death during the 1st year after infa rct ion and possibly for 2 - 3 years . With respect to the independent effects of the physical exercise component of cardiac rehabilitation , the relatively small number of " exercise only " trials , combined with the possibility that they may have had a formal or informal nonexercise component precludes the possibility of reaching any definitive conclusion . To do so would require a r and omized trial of sufficient size to distinguish between no effect and the most plausible effect based on the results of this overview Abstract Objective : To evaluate the use of a computerised support system for decision making for implementing evidence based clinical guidelines for the management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care . Design : A before and after pragmatic cluster r and omised controlled trial utilising a two by two incomplete block design . Setting : 60 general practice s in north east Engl and . Participants : General practitioners and practice nurses in the study practice s and their patients aged 18 or over with angina or asthma . Main outcome measures : Adherence to the guidelines , based on review of case notes and patient reported generic and condition specific outcome measures . Results : The computerised decision support system had no significant effect on consultation rates , process of care measures ( including prescribing ) , or any patient reported outcomes for either condition . Levels of use of the software were low . Conclusions : No effect was found of computerised evidence based guidelines on the management of asthma or angina in adults in primary care . This was probably due to low levels of use of the software , despite the system being optimised as far as was technically possible . Even if the technical problems of producing a system that fully supports the management of chronic disease were solved , there remains the challenge of integrating the systems into clinical encounters where busy practitioners manage patients with complex , multiple conditions Aim To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mobile phone intervention to improve exercise capacity and physical activity behaviour in people with ischaemic heart disease ( IHD ) . Methods and results In this single-blind , parallel , two-arm , r and omized controlled trial adults ( n = 171 ) with IHD were r and omized to receive a mobile phone delivered intervention  ( HEART ; n = 85 ) plus usual care , or usual care alone ( n = 86 ) . Adult participants aged 18 years or more , with a diagnosis of IHD , were clinical ly stable as out patients , able to perform exercise , able to underst and and write English , and had access to the Internet . The HEART ( Heart Exercise And Remote Technologies ) intervention involved a personalized , automated package of text messages and a secure website with video messages aim ed at increasing exercise behaviour , delivered over 24 weeks . All participants were able to access usual community-based cardiac rehabilitation , which involves encouragement of physical activity and an offer to join a local cardiac support club . All outcomes were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks and included peak oxygen uptake ( PVO2 ; primary outcome ) , self-reported physical activity , health-related quality of life , self-efficacy and motivation ( secondary outcomes ) . Results showed no differences in PVO2 between the two groups ( difference −0.21 ml kg−1 min−1 , 95 % CI : −1.1 , 0.7 ; p = 0.65 ) at 24 weeks . However significant treatment effects were observed for selected secondary outcomes , including leisure time physical activity ( difference 110.2 min/week , 95 % CI : −0.8 , 221.3 ; p = 0.05 ) and walking ( difference 151.4 min/week , 95 % CI : 27.6 , 275.2 ; p = 0.02 ) . There were also significant improvements in self-efficacy to be active ( difference 6.2 % , 95 % CI : 0.2 , 12.2 ; p = 0.04 ) and the general health domain of the SF36 ( difference 2.1 , 95 % CI : 0.1 , 4.1 ; p = 0.03 ) at 24 weeks . The HEART programme was considered likely to be cost-effective for leisure time activity and walking . Conclusions A mobile phone intervention was not effective at increasing exercise capacity over and above usual care . The intervention was effective and probably cost-effective for increasing physical activity and may have the potential to augment existing cardiac rehabilitation services Background : The CardioFit internet-based expert system was design ed to promote physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease ( CHD ) who were not participating in cardiac rehabilitation . Design : This r and omized controlled trial compared CardioFit to usual care to assess its effects on physical activity following hospitalization for acute coronary syndromes . Methods : A total of 223 participants were recruited at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute or London Health Sciences Centre and r and omly assigned to either  CardioFit  ( n = 115 ) or  usual care ( n = 108 ) . The CardioFit group received a personally tailored physical-activity plan upon discharge from the hospital and access to a secure website for activity planning and tracking . They completed five online tutorials over a 6-month period and were in email contact with an exercise specialist . Usual care consisted of physical activity guidance from an attending cardiologist .  Physical activity was measured by pedometer and self-reported over a 7-day period , 6 and 12 months after r and omization . Results : The CardioFit internet-based physical activity expert system significantly increased objective ly measured ( p = 0.023 ) and self-reported physical activity ( p = 0.047 ) compared to usual care . Emotional ( p = 0.038 ) and physical ( p = 0.031 ) dimensions of heart disease health-related quality of life were also higher with CardioFit compared to usual care . Conclusions : Patients with CHD using an internet-based activity prescription with online coaching were more physically active at follow up than those receiving usual care . Use of the CardioFit program could extend the reach of rehabilitation and secondary -prevention services OBJECTIVE To assess the impact and cost-effectiveness of two information-based provider reminder interventions design ed to improve self-care management and outcomes of heart failure ( HF ) patients . DATA SOURCES / STUDY SETTING Interview and agency administrative data on 628 home care patients with a primary diagnosis of HF . STUDY DESIGN Patients were treated by nurses r and omly assigned to usual care or one of two intervention groups . The basic intervention was an e-mail to the patient 's nurse highlighting six HF-specific clinical recommendations . The augmented intervention supplemented the initial nurse reminder with additional clinician and patient re sources . DATA COLLECTION Patient interviews were conducted 45 days post admission to measure self-management behaviors , HF-specific outcomes ( Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Question naire-KCCQ ) , health-related quality of life ( EuroQoL ) , and service use . PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Both interventions improved the mean KCCQ summary score ( 15.3 and 12.9 percent , respectively ) relative to usual care ( p < or = .05 ) . The basic intervention also yielded a higher EuroQoL score relative to usual care ( p < or = .05 ) . In addition , the interventions had a positive impact on medication knowledge , diet , and weight monitoring . The basic intervention was more cost-effective than the augmented intervention in improving clinical outcomes . CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the positive impact of targeting evidence -based computer reminders to home health nurses to improve patient self-care behaviors , knowledge , and clinical outcomes . It also advances the field 's limited underst and ing of the cost-effectiveness of selected strategies for translating research into practice Objective To investigate whether an internet based , nurse led vascular risk factor management programme promoting self management on top of usual care is more effective than usual care alone in reducing vascular risk factors in patients with clinical ly manifest vascular disease . Design Prospect i ve r and omised controlled trial . Setting Multicentre trial in secondary and tertiary healthcare setting . Participants 330 patients with a recent clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis in the coronary , cerebral , or peripheral arteries and with at least two treatable risk factors not at goal . Intervention Personalised website with an overview and actual status of patients ’ risk factors and mail communication via the website with a nurse practitioner for 12 months ; the intervention combined self management support , monitoring of disease control , and drug treatment . Main outcome measures The primary endpoint was the relative change in Framingham heart risk score after 1 year . Secondary endpoints were absolute changes in the levels of risk factors and the differences between groups in the change in proportion of patients reaching treatment goals for each risk factor . Results Participants ’ mean age was 59.9 ( SD 8.4 ) years , and most patients ( n=246 ; 75 % ) were male . After 1 year , the relative change in Framingham heart risk score of the intervention group compared with the usual care group was −14 % ( 95 % confidence interval −25 % to −2 % ) . At baseline , the Framingham heart risk score was higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group ( 16.1 ( SD 10.6 ) v 14.0 ( 10.5 ) ) , so the outcome was adjusted for the separate variables of the Framingham heart risk score and for the baseline Framingham heart risk score . This produced a relative change of −12 % ( −22 % to −3 % ) in Framingham heart risk score for the intervention group compared with the usual care group adjusted for the separate variables of the score and −8 % ( −18 % to 2 % ) adjusted for the baseline score . Of the individual risk factors , a difference between groups was observed in low density lipoprotein cholesterol ( −0.3 , −0.5 to −0.1 , mmol/L ) and smoking ( −7.7 % , −1 
    Output:
    
agent
Similarly , there was no clear evidence of effect for cardiovascular risk factors , although again the number of studies reporting these was small .
There was some evidence for beneficial effects on HRQOL , dietary outcomes , and physical activity , although firm conclusions can not yet be made .
The effects on healthcare utilisation and cost-effectiveness are also inconclusive , and trials are yet to measure the impact of  Internet interventions on compliance with medication .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background — Secondary prevention by risk factor modification improves patient outcomes , yet it is often not achieved in clinical practice . Reasons for failure stem from challenges of prioritizing risk factor reduction and engaging patients in changing their behaviors . We hypothesize that a novel telemedicine intervention with tailored patient education could improve cardiovascular risk factors . Methods — To evaluate this intervention , we propose enrolling 450 patients with a recent myocardial infa rct ion and hypertension into a 3-arm r and omized , controlled trial . The first arm ( n=150 ) will receive home blood pressure ( BP ) monitors plus a nurse-delivered , telephone-based tailored patient education intervention and will be enrolled into HealthVault , a Microsoft electronic health record platform . The second arm ( n=150 ) will also receive BP monitors plus a tailored patient education intervention and be enrolled in HeartVault . However , the patient education intervention will be delivered by a Web-based program and will cover topics identical to those in the nurse-delivered intervention . Both arms will be compared with a control group receiving st and ard care ( n=150 ) . All participants will have an in-person assessment at baseline and at completion of the study , including st and ardized measurements of BP , LDL cholesterol , and glycosylated hemoglobin ( in diabetic subjects ) . The study design will allow assessment of a telephone-based , nurse-administered disease management program versus st and ard care . The main outcome of interest is the reduction in systolic BP in each intervention group compared with the control group at 12 months . Secondary outcomes assessed will include reductions in LDL cholesterol , body weight , and glycosylated hemoglobin , as well as adherence to evidence -based therapies and improvement in health behaviors . Conclusion — If successful in optimizing BP control , managing other coronary heart disease risk factors , and demonstrating a lower cost , the Web-based disease management tool has the potential to enhance coronary artery disease management , quality of care , and ultimately , patient outcomes . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00901277 Of 22 r and omized trials of rehabilitation with exercise  after myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) , one trial had results that achieved conventional statistical significance . To determine whether or not these studies , in the aggregate , show a significant benefit of rehabilitation after myocardial infa rct ion , we performed an overview of all r and omized trials , involving 4,554 patients ; we evaluated total and cardiovascular mortality , sudden death , and fatal and nonfatal reinfa rct ion . For each endpoint , we calculated an odds ratio ( OR ) and 95 % confidence interval ( 95 % CI ) for the trials combined . After an average of 3 years of follow-up , the ORs were significantly lower in the rehabilitation than in the comparison group : specifically , total mortality ( OR = 0.80 [ 0.66 , 0.96 ] ) , cardiovascular mortality ( OR = 0.78 [ 0.63 , 0.96 ] ) , and fatal reinfa rct ion ( OR = 0.75 [ 0.59 , 0.95 ] ) . The OR for sudden death was significantly lower in the rehabilitation than in the comparison group at 1 year ( OR = 0.63 [ 0.41 , 0.97 ] ) . The data were compatible with a benefit at 2 ( OR = 0.76 [ 0.54 , 1.06 ] ) and 3 years ( OR = 0.92 [ 0.69 , 1.23 ] ) , but these findings were not statistically significant . For nonfatal reinfa rct ion , there were no significant differences between the two groups after 1 ( OR = 1.09 [ 0.76 , 1.57 ] ) , 2 ( OR = 1.10 [ 0.82 , 1.47 ] ) , or 3 years ( OR = 1.09 [ 0.88 , 1.34 ] ) of follow-up . The observed 20 % reduction in overall mortality reflects a decreased risk of cardiovascular mortality and fatal reinfa rct ion throughout at least 3 years and a reduction in sudden death during the 1st year after infa rct ion and possibly for 2 - 3 years . With respect to the independent effects of the physical exercise component of cardiac rehabilitation , the relatively small number of " exercise only " trials , combined with the possibility that they may have had a formal or informal nonexercise component precludes the possibility of reaching any definitive conclusion . To do so would require a r and omized trial of sufficient size to distinguish between no effect and the most plausible effect based on the results of this overview Abstract Objective : To evaluate the use of a computerised support system for decision making for implementing evidence based clinical guidelines for the management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care . Design : A before and after pragmatic cluster r and omised controlled trial utilising a two by two incomplete block design . Setting : 60 general practice s in north east Engl and . Participants : General practitioners and practice nurses in the study practice s and their patients aged 18 or over with angina or asthma . Main outcome measures : Adherence to the guidelines , based on review of case notes and patient reported generic and condition specific outcome measures . Results : The computerised decision support system had no significant effect on consultation rates , process of care measures ( including prescribing ) , or any patient reported outcomes for either condition . Levels of use of the software were low . Conclusions : No effect was found of computerised evidence based guidelines on the management of asthma or angina in adults in primary care . This was probably due to low levels of use of the software , despite the system being optimised as far as was technically possible . Even if the technical problems of producing a system that fully supports the management of chronic disease were solved , there remains the challenge of integrating the systems into clinical encounters where busy practitioners manage patients with complex , multiple conditions Aim To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mobile phone intervention to improve exercise capacity and physical activity behaviour in people with ischaemic heart disease ( IHD ) . Methods and results In this single-blind , parallel , two-arm , r and omized controlled trial adults ( n = 171 ) with IHD were r and omized to receive a mobile phone delivered intervention  ( HEART ; n = 85 ) plus usual care , or usual care alone ( n = 86 ) . Adult participants aged 18 years or more , with a diagnosis of IHD , were clinical ly stable as out patients , able to perform exercise , able to underst and and write English , and had access to the Internet . The HEART ( Heart Exercise And Remote Technologies ) intervention involved a personalized , automated package of text messages and a secure website with video messages aim ed at increasing exercise behaviour , delivered over 24 weeks . All participants were able to access usual community-based cardiac rehabilitation , which involves encouragement of physical activity and an offer to join a local cardiac support club . All outcomes were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks and included peak oxygen uptake ( PVO2 ; primary outcome ) , self-reported physical activity , health-related quality of life , self-efficacy and motivation ( secondary outcomes ) . Results showed no differences in PVO2 between the two groups ( difference −0.21 ml kg−1 min−1 , 95 % CI : −1.1 , 0.7 ; p = 0.65 ) at 24 weeks . However significant treatment effects were observed for selected secondary outcomes , including leisure time physical activity ( difference 110.2 min/week , 95 % CI : −0.8 , 221.3 ; p = 0.05 ) and walking ( difference 151.4 min/week , 95 % CI : 27.6 , 275.2 ; p = 0.02 ) . There were also significant improvements in self-efficacy to be active ( difference 6.2 % , 95 % CI : 0.2 , 12.2 ; p = 0.04 ) and the general health domain of the SF36 ( difference 2.1 , 95 % CI : 0.1 , 4.1 ; p = 0.03 ) at 24 weeks . The HEART programme was considered likely to be cost-effective for leisure time activity and walking . Conclusions A mobile phone intervention was not effective at increasing exercise capacity over and above usual care . The intervention was effective and probably cost-effective for increasing physical activity and may have the potential to augment existing cardiac rehabilitation services Background : The CardioFit internet-based expert system was design ed to promote physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease ( CHD ) who were not participating in cardiac rehabilitation . Design : This r and omized controlled trial compared CardioFit to usual care to assess its effects on physical activity following hospitalization for acute coronary syndromes . Methods : A total of 223 participants were recruited at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute or London Health Sciences Centre and r and omly assigned to either  CardioFit  ( n = 115 ) or  usual care ( n = 108 ) . The CardioFit group received a personally tailored physical-activity plan upon discharge from the hospital and access to a secure website for activity planning and tracking . They completed five online tutorials over a 6-month period and were in email contact with an exercise specialist . Usual care consisted of physical activity guidance from an attending cardiologist .  Physical activity was measured by pedometer and self-reported over a 7-day period , 6 and 12 months after r and omization . Results : The CardioFit internet-based physical activity expert system significantly increased objective ly measured ( p = 0.023 ) and self-reported physical activity ( p = 0.047 ) compared to usual care . Emotional ( p = 0.038 ) and physical ( p = 0.031 ) dimensions of heart disease health-related quality of life were also higher with CardioFit compared to usual care . Conclusions : Patients with CHD using an internet-based activity prescription with online coaching were more physically active at follow up than those receiving usual care . Use of the CardioFit program could extend the reach of rehabilitation and secondary -prevention services OBJECTIVE To assess the impact and cost-effectiveness of two information-based provider reminder interventions design ed to improve self-care management and outcomes of heart failure ( HF ) patients . DATA SOURCES / STUDY SETTING Interview and agency administrative data on 628 home care patients with a primary diagnosis of HF . STUDY DESIGN Patients were treated by nurses r and omly assigned to usual care or one of two intervention groups . The basic intervention was an e-mail to the patient 's nurse highlighting six HF-specific clinical recommendations . The augmented intervention supplemented the initial nurse reminder with additional clinician and patient re sources . DATA COLLECTION Patient interviews were conducted 45 days post admission to measure self-management behaviors , HF-specific outcomes ( Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Question naire-KCCQ ) , health-related quality of life ( EuroQoL ) , and service use . PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Both interventions improved the mean KCCQ summary score ( 15.3 and 12.9 percent , respectively ) relative to usual care ( p < or = .05 ) . The basic intervention also yielded a higher EuroQoL score relative to usual care ( p < or = .05 ) . In addition , the interventions had a positive impact on medication knowledge , diet , and weight monitoring . The basic intervention was more cost-effective than the augmented intervention in improving clinical outcomes . CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the positive impact of targeting evidence -based computer reminders to home health nurses to improve patient self-care behaviors , knowledge , and clinical outcomes . It also advances the field 's limited underst and ing of the cost-effectiveness of selected strategies for translating research into practice Objective To investigate whether an internet based , nurse led vascular risk factor management programme promoting self management on top of usual care is more effective than usual care alone in reducing vascular risk factors in patients with clinical ly manifest vascular disease . Design Prospect i ve r and omised controlled trial . Setting Multicentre trial in secondary and tertiary healthcare setting . Participants 330 patients with a recent clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis in the coronary , cerebral , or peripheral arteries and with at least two treatable risk factors not at goal . Intervention Personalised website with an overview and actual status of patients ’ risk factors and mail communication via the website with a nurse practitioner for 12 months ; the intervention combined self management support , monitoring of disease control , and drug treatment . Main outcome measures The primary endpoint was the relative change in Framingham heart risk score after 1 year . Secondary endpoints were absolute changes in the levels of risk factors and the differences between groups in the change in proportion of patients reaching treatment goals for each risk factor . Results Participants ’ mean age was 59.9 ( SD 8.4 ) years , and most patients ( n=246 ; 75 % ) were male . After 1 year , the relative change in Framingham heart risk score of the intervention group compared with the usual care group was −14 % ( 95 % confidence interval −25 % to −2 % ) . At baseline , the Framingham heart risk score was higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group ( 16.1 ( SD 10.6 ) v 14.0 ( 10.5 ) ) , so the outcome was adjusted for the separate variables of the Framingham heart risk score and for the baseline Framingham heart risk score . This produced a relative change of −12 % ( −22 % to −3 % ) in Framingham heart risk score for the intervention group compared with the usual care group adjusted for the separate variables of the score and −8 % ( −18 % to 2 % ) adjusted for the baseline score . Of the individual risk factors , a difference between groups was observed in low density lipoprotein cholesterol ( −0.3 , −0.5 to −0.1 , mmol/L ) and smoking ( −7.7 % , −1 
    Output:
    