human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background Excessive time spent in sedentary behaviours ( sitting or lying with low energy expenditure ) is associated with an increased risk for type 2 diabetes , cardiovascular disease and some cancers . Desk-based office workers typically accumulate high amounts of daily sitting time , often in prolonged unbroken bouts . The St and Up Victoria study aims to determine whether a 3-month multi-component intervention in the office setting reduces workplace sitting , particularly prolonged , unbroken sitting time , and results in improvements in cardio-metabolic biomarkers and work-related outcomes , compared to usual practice . Methods / Design A two-arm cluster-r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) , with worksites as the unit of r and omization , will be conducted in 16 worksites located in Victoria , Australia . Work units from one organisation ( Department of Human Services , Australian Government ) will be allocated to either the multi-component intervention ( organisational , environmental [ height-adjustable workstations ] , and individual behavioural strategies ) or to a usual practice control group . The recruitment target is 160 participants ( office-based workers aged 18–65 years and working at least 0.6 full time equivalent ) per arm . At each assessment ( 0- [ baseline ] , 3- [ post intervention ] , and 12-months [ follow-up ] ) , objective measurement via the activPAL3 activity monitor will be used to assess workplace : sitting time ( primary outcome ) ; prolonged sitting time ( sitting time accrued in bouts of ≥30 minutes ) ; st and ing time ; sit-to-st and transitions ; and , moving time . Additional outcomes assessed will include : non-workplace activity ; cardio-metabolic biomarkers and health indicators ( including fasting glucose , lipids and insulin ; anthropometric measures ; blood pressure ; and , musculoskeletal symptoms ) ; and , work-related outcomes ( presenteeism , absenteeism , productivity , work performance ) . Incremental cost-effectiveness and identification of both workplace and individual-level mediators and moderators of change will also be evaluated . Discussion St and Up Victoria will be the first cluster- RCT to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component intervention aim ed at reducing prolonged workplace sitting in office workers . Strengths include the objective measurement of activity and assessment of the intervention on markers of cardio-metabolic health . Health- and work-related benefits , as well as the cost-effectiveness of the intervention , will help to inform future occupational practice .Trial registration BACKGROUND A prospect i ve study of computer users was performed to determine the occurrence of and evaluate risk factors for  neck or shoulder ( N/S ) and h and or arm ( H/A ) musculoskeletal symptoms ( MSS ) and disorders ( MSD ) . METHODS Individuals ( n = 632 ) newly hired into jobs requiring > or = 15 hr/week of computer use were followed for up to 3 years . At study entry , workstation dimensions and worker postures were measured and medical and psychosocial risk factors were assessed . Daily diaries were used to document work practice s and incident MSS . Those reporting MSS were examined for specific MSD . Incidence rates of MSS and MSD were estimated with survival analysis . Cox regression models were used to evaluate associations between participant characteristics at entry and MSS and MSD . RESULTS The annual incidence of N/S MSS was 58 cases/100 person-years and of N/S MSD was 35 cases/100 person-years . The most common N/S MSD was somatic pain syndrome . The annual incidence of H/A MSS was 39 cases/100 person-years and of H/A MSD was 21 cases/100 person-years . The most common H/A disorder was deQuervain 's tendonitis . Forty-six percent of N/S and 32 % of H/A MSS occurred during the first month of follow-up . Gender , age , ethnicity , and prior history of N/S pain were associated with N/S MSS and MSD . Gender , prior history of H/A pain , prior computer use , and children at home were associated with either H/A MSS or MSD . CONCLUSIONS H/A and N/S MSS and MSD were common among computer users . More than 50 % of computer users reported MSS during the first year after starting a new job Background : Seated working positions are often regarded as a cause for discomfort in the musculoskeletal system . Performing work in different working positions — that is , alternating between sitting and st and ing ( sit-st and workstation paradigm)—could help reduce physical complaints . Objective : The questions were whether performing office work partly in a st and ing position leads to reduced complaints and whether st and ing would change the efficiency of data entry office work . Method : We investigated the effect of a sit-st and workstation paradigmd during experimental data entry office work on physical and psychological complaints and data entry efficiency by conducting a r and omized controlled trial with 60 male participants ages 18 to 35 years . Results : In this experiment , musculoskeletal complaints were reduced by a sit-st and workstation paradigm . A trend could be identified indicating a small but nonsignificant loss of efficiency in data entry while st and ing . Conclusion : A sit-st and workstation paradigm reduces musculoskeletal complaints without considerably affecting data entry efficiency under the presented study conditions ( young male participants , short duration , fixed and controlled sit-st and workstation paradigm , simulated experimental working condition ) . Application : According to the present data , implementing a sit-st and workstation paradigm can be an effective workplace health intervention to reduce musculoskeletal complaints . This experiment encourages further studies on the effectiveness of a sit-st and workstation paradigm . Experimental research and field studies that prove the reduction of complaints when introducing a sit-st and workstation paradigm in the workplace could be the basis for evidence -based recommendations regarding such interventions OBJECTIVE Observational studies show breaking up prolonged sitting has beneficial associations with cardiometabolic risk markers , but intervention studies are required to investigate causality . We examined the acute effects on postpr and ial glucose and insulin levels of uninterrupted sitting compared with sitting interrupted by brief bouts of light- or moderate-intensity walking . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Overweight/obese adults ( n = 19 ) , aged 45–65 years , were recruited for a r and omized three-period , three-treatment acute crossover trial : 1 ) uninterrupted sitting ; 2 ) seated with 2-min bouts of light-intensity walking every 20 min ; and 3 ) seated with 2-min bouts of moderate-intensity walking every 20 min . A st and ardized test drink was provided after an initial 2-h period of uninterrupted sitting . The positive incremental area under curves ( iAUC ) for glucose and insulin ( mean [ 95 % CI ] ) for the 5 h after the test drink ( 75 g glucose , 50 g fat ) were calculated for the respective treatments . RESULTS The glucose iAUC ( mmol/L ) ⋅ h after both activity-break conditions was reduced ( light : 5.2 [ 4.1–6.6 ] ; moderate : 4.9 [ 3.8–6.1 ] ; both P < 0.01 ) compared with uninterrupted sitting ( 6.9 [ 5.5–8.7 ] ) . Insulin iAUC ( pmol/L ) ⋅ h was also reduced with both activity-break conditions ( light : 633.6 [ 552.4–727.1 ] ; moderate : 637.6 [ 555.5–731.9 ] , P < 0.0001 ) compared with uninterrupted sitting ( 828.6 [ 722.0–950.9 ] ) . CONCLUSIONS Interrupting sitting time with short bouts of light- or moderate-intensity walking  lowers postpr and ial glucose and insulin levels  in overweight/obese adults . This may improve glucose metabolism and potentially be an important public health and clinical intervention strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk Background Occupational sedentary behaviour is an important contributor to overall sedentary risk . There is limited evidence for effective workplace interventions to reduce occupational sedentary time and increase light activity during work hours . The purpose of the study was to determine if participatory workplace interventions could reduce total sedentary time , sustained sedentary time ( bouts > 30 minutes ) , increase the frequency of breaks in sedentary time and promote light intensity activity and moderate/vigorous activity ( MVPA ) during work hours . Methods A r and omised controlled trial ( ANZCTR number : ACTN12612000743864 ) was conducted using clerical , call centre and data processing workers ( n = 62 , aged 25–59 years ) in 3 large government organisations in Perth , Australia . Three groups developed interventions with a participatory approach : ‘ Active office ’ ( n = 19 ) , ‘ Active Workstation ’ and promotion of incidental office activity ; ‘ Traditional physical activity ’ ( n = 14 ) , pedometer challenge to increase activity between productive work time and ‘ Office ergonomics ’ ( n = 29 ) , computer workstation design and breaking up computer tasks . Accelerometer ( ActiGraph GT3X , 7 days ) determined sedentary time , sustained sedentary time , breaks in sedentary time , light intensity activity and MVPA on work days and during work hours were measured before and following a 12 week intervention period . Results For all participants there was a significant reduction in sedentary time on work days ( −1.6 % , p = 0.006 ) and during work hours ( −1.7 % , p = 0.014 ) and a significant increase in number of breaks/sedentary hour on work days ( 0.64 , p = 0.005 ) and during work hours ( 0.72 , p = 0.015 ) ; there was a concurrent significant increase in light activity during work hours ( 1.5 % , p = 0.012 ) and MVPA on work days ( 0.6 % , p = 0.012 ) . Conclusions This study explored novel ways to modify work practice s to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour . Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time , increase the frequency of breaks and improve light activity and MVPA of office workers by using a variety of interventions . Trial Registration Australian New Zeal and Clinical Trials Registry ACTN12612000743864 Objectives To test the efficacy of a multicomponent technology intervention for reducing daily sedentary time and improving cardiometabolic disease risk among sedentary , overweight university employees . Design Blinded , r and omised controlled trial . Setting A large south-eastern university in the USA . Participants 49 middle-aged , primarily female , sedentary and overweight adults working in sedentary jobs enrolled in the study . A total of 40 participants completed the study . Interventions Participants were r and omised to either : ( 1 ) an intervention group ( N=23 ; 47.6 + 9.9 years ; 94.1 % female ; 33.2 + 4.5 kg/m2 ) ; ( 2 ) or wait-list control group ( N=17 ; 42.6 + 8.9 years ; 86.9 % female ; 31.7 + 4.9 kg/m2 ) . The intervention group received a theory-based , internet-delivered programme , a portable pedal machine at work and a pedometer for 12 weeks . The wait-list control group maintained their behaviours for 12 weeks . Outcome measures Primary ( sedentary and physical activity behaviour measured objective ly through StepWatch ) and secondary ( heart rate , blood pressure , height , weight , waist circumference , per cent body fat , cardiorespiratory fitness , fasting lipids ) outcomes were measured at baseline and postintervention ( 12 weeks ) . Exploratory outcomes including intervention compliance and process evaluation measures were also assessed postintervention . Results Compared to controls , the intervention group reduced daily sedentary time ( mean change ( 95%CI ) : −58.7 min/day ( −118.4 to 0.99 ; p<0.01 ) ) after adjusting for baseline values and monitor wear time . Intervention participants logged on to the website 71.3 % of all intervention days , used the pedal machine 37.7 % of all working intervention days and pedalled an average of 31.1 min/day . Conclusions These findings suggest that the intervention was engaging and result ed in reductions in daily sedentary time among full-time sedentary employees . These findings hold public health significance due to the growing number of sedentary jobs and the potential of these technologies in large-scale worksite programmes . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov # NCT01371084 Sitting on a therapy ball or st and ing may be a passive means of increasing energy expenditure throughout the workday . The purpose of this study was to determine the energy expenditure and liking of performing clerical work in various postures . Subjects included 24 men and women employed in sedentary clerical occupations .  Energy expenditure was measured while word processing in three st and ardized postures ; sitting in an office chair , sitting on a therapy ball , and st and ing . Adults ranked their comfort , fatigue , and liking of each posture and were asked to perform their choice of 20 min of additional clerical work in one of the postures . Energy expenditure was 4.1 kcal/h greater ( p ≤ 0.05 ) while performing clerical work while sitting on a therapy ball and st and ing than while sitting in an office chair . There was no difference in energy expenditure between the therapy ball and st and ing postures ( p ≥ 0.48 ) . Subjects also liked sitting on a therapy ball  as much as sitting in an office chair and liked sitting on a therapy ball  more than st and ing ( p ≤ 0.05 ) . More subjects chose to perform additional clerical work while seated on a therapy 
    Output:
    
agent
Non-significant changes were reported for most health- and work-related outcomes .
Findings suggest that activity-permissive workstations can be effective to reduce occupational sedentary time , without compromising work performance .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background Excessive time spent in sedentary behaviours ( sitting or lying with low energy expenditure ) is associated with an increased risk for type 2 diabetes , cardiovascular disease and some cancers . Desk-based office workers typically accumulate high amounts of daily sitting time , often in prolonged unbroken bouts . The St and Up Victoria study aims to determine whether a 3-month multi-component intervention in the office setting reduces workplace sitting , particularly prolonged , unbroken sitting time , and results in improvements in cardio-metabolic biomarkers and work-related outcomes , compared to usual practice . Methods / Design A two-arm cluster-r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) , with worksites as the unit of r and omization , will be conducted in 16 worksites located in Victoria , Australia . Work units from one organisation ( Department of Human Services , Australian Government ) will be allocated to either the multi-component intervention ( organisational , environmental [ height-adjustable workstations ] , and individual behavioural strategies ) or to a usual practice control group . The recruitment target is 160 participants ( office-based workers aged 18–65 years and working at least 0.6 full time equivalent ) per arm . At each assessment ( 0- [ baseline ] , 3- [ post intervention ] , and 12-months [ follow-up ] ) , objective measurement via the activPAL3 activity monitor will be used to assess workplace : sitting time ( primary outcome ) ; prolonged sitting time ( sitting time accrued in bouts of ≥30 minutes ) ; st and ing time ; sit-to-st and transitions ; and , moving time . Additional outcomes assessed will include : non-workplace activity ; cardio-metabolic biomarkers and health indicators ( including fasting glucose , lipids and insulin ; anthropometric measures ; blood pressure ; and , musculoskeletal symptoms ) ; and , work-related outcomes ( presenteeism , absenteeism , productivity , work performance ) . Incremental cost-effectiveness and identification of both workplace and individual-level mediators and moderators of change will also be evaluated . Discussion St and Up Victoria will be the first cluster- RCT to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component intervention aim ed at reducing prolonged workplace sitting in office workers . Strengths include the objective measurement of activity and assessment of the intervention on markers of cardio-metabolic health . Health- and work-related benefits , as well as the cost-effectiveness of the intervention , will help to inform future occupational practice .Trial registration BACKGROUND A prospect i ve study of computer users was performed to determine the occurrence of and evaluate risk factors for  neck or shoulder ( N/S ) and h and or arm ( H/A ) musculoskeletal symptoms ( MSS ) and disorders ( MSD ) . METHODS Individuals ( n = 632 ) newly hired into jobs requiring > or = 15 hr/week of computer use were followed for up to 3 years . At study entry , workstation dimensions and worker postures were measured and medical and psychosocial risk factors were assessed . Daily diaries were used to document work practice s and incident MSS . Those reporting MSS were examined for specific MSD . Incidence rates of MSS and MSD were estimated with survival analysis . Cox regression models were used to evaluate associations between participant characteristics at entry and MSS and MSD . RESULTS The annual incidence of N/S MSS was 58 cases/100 person-years and of N/S MSD was 35 cases/100 person-years . The most common N/S MSD was somatic pain syndrome . The annual incidence of H/A MSS was 39 cases/100 person-years and of H/A MSD was 21 cases/100 person-years . The most common H/A disorder was deQuervain 's tendonitis . Forty-six percent of N/S and 32 % of H/A MSS occurred during the first month of follow-up . Gender , age , ethnicity , and prior history of N/S pain were associated with N/S MSS and MSD . Gender , prior history of H/A pain , prior computer use , and children at home were associated with either H/A MSS or MSD . CONCLUSIONS H/A and N/S MSS and MSD were common among computer users . More than 50 % of computer users reported MSS during the first year after starting a new job Background : Seated working positions are often regarded as a cause for discomfort in the musculoskeletal system . Performing work in different working positions — that is , alternating between sitting and st and ing ( sit-st and workstation paradigm)—could help reduce physical complaints . Objective : The questions were whether performing office work partly in a st and ing position leads to reduced complaints and whether st and ing would change the efficiency of data entry office work . Method : We investigated the effect of a sit-st and workstation paradigmd during experimental data entry office work on physical and psychological complaints and data entry efficiency by conducting a r and omized controlled trial with 60 male participants ages 18 to 35 years . Results : In this experiment , musculoskeletal complaints were reduced by a sit-st and workstation paradigm . A trend could be identified indicating a small but nonsignificant loss of efficiency in data entry while st and ing . Conclusion : A sit-st and workstation paradigm reduces musculoskeletal complaints without considerably affecting data entry efficiency under the presented study conditions ( young male participants , short duration , fixed and controlled sit-st and workstation paradigm , simulated experimental working condition ) . Application : According to the present data , implementing a sit-st and workstation paradigm can be an effective workplace health intervention to reduce musculoskeletal complaints . This experiment encourages further studies on the effectiveness of a sit-st and workstation paradigm . Experimental research and field studies that prove the reduction of complaints when introducing a sit-st and workstation paradigm in the workplace could be the basis for evidence -based recommendations regarding such interventions OBJECTIVE Observational studies show breaking up prolonged sitting has beneficial associations with cardiometabolic risk markers , but intervention studies are required to investigate causality . We examined the acute effects on postpr and ial glucose and insulin levels of uninterrupted sitting compared with sitting interrupted by brief bouts of light- or moderate-intensity walking . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Overweight/obese adults ( n = 19 ) , aged 45–65 years , were recruited for a r and omized three-period , three-treatment acute crossover trial : 1 ) uninterrupted sitting ; 2 ) seated with 2-min bouts of light-intensity walking every 20 min ; and 3 ) seated with 2-min bouts of moderate-intensity walking every 20 min . A st and ardized test drink was provided after an initial 2-h period of uninterrupted sitting . The positive incremental area under curves ( iAUC ) for glucose and insulin ( mean [ 95 % CI ] ) for the 5 h after the test drink ( 75 g glucose , 50 g fat ) were calculated for the respective treatments . RESULTS The glucose iAUC ( mmol/L ) ⋅ h after both activity-break conditions was reduced ( light : 5.2 [ 4.1–6.6 ] ; moderate : 4.9 [ 3.8–6.1 ] ; both P < 0.01 ) compared with uninterrupted sitting ( 6.9 [ 5.5–8.7 ] ) . Insulin iAUC ( pmol/L ) ⋅ h was also reduced with both activity-break conditions ( light : 633.6 [ 552.4–727.1 ] ; moderate : 637.6 [ 555.5–731.9 ] , P < 0.0001 ) compared with uninterrupted sitting ( 828.6 [ 722.0–950.9 ] ) . CONCLUSIONS Interrupting sitting time with short bouts of light- or moderate-intensity walking  lowers postpr and ial glucose and insulin levels  in overweight/obese adults . This may improve glucose metabolism and potentially be an important public health and clinical intervention strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk Background Occupational sedentary behaviour is an important contributor to overall sedentary risk . There is limited evidence for effective workplace interventions to reduce occupational sedentary time and increase light activity during work hours . The purpose of the study was to determine if participatory workplace interventions could reduce total sedentary time , sustained sedentary time ( bouts > 30 minutes ) , increase the frequency of breaks in sedentary time and promote light intensity activity and moderate/vigorous activity ( MVPA ) during work hours . Methods A r and omised controlled trial ( ANZCTR number : ACTN12612000743864 ) was conducted using clerical , call centre and data processing workers ( n = 62 , aged 25–59 years ) in 3 large government organisations in Perth , Australia . Three groups developed interventions with a participatory approach : ‘ Active office ’ ( n = 19 ) , ‘ Active Workstation ’ and promotion of incidental office activity ; ‘ Traditional physical activity ’ ( n = 14 ) , pedometer challenge to increase activity between productive work time and ‘ Office ergonomics ’ ( n = 29 ) , computer workstation design and breaking up computer tasks . Accelerometer ( ActiGraph GT3X , 7 days ) determined sedentary time , sustained sedentary time , breaks in sedentary time , light intensity activity and MVPA on work days and during work hours were measured before and following a 12 week intervention period . Results For all participants there was a significant reduction in sedentary time on work days ( −1.6 % , p = 0.006 ) and during work hours ( −1.7 % , p = 0.014 ) and a significant increase in number of breaks/sedentary hour on work days ( 0.64 , p = 0.005 ) and during work hours ( 0.72 , p = 0.015 ) ; there was a concurrent significant increase in light activity during work hours ( 1.5 % , p = 0.012 ) and MVPA on work days ( 0.6 % , p = 0.012 ) . Conclusions This study explored novel ways to modify work practice s to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour . Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time , increase the frequency of breaks and improve light activity and MVPA of office workers by using a variety of interventions . Trial Registration Australian New Zeal and Clinical Trials Registry ACTN12612000743864 Objectives To test the efficacy of a multicomponent technology intervention for reducing daily sedentary time and improving cardiometabolic disease risk among sedentary , overweight university employees . Design Blinded , r and omised controlled trial . Setting A large south-eastern university in the USA . Participants 49 middle-aged , primarily female , sedentary and overweight adults working in sedentary jobs enrolled in the study . A total of 40 participants completed the study . Interventions Participants were r and omised to either : ( 1 ) an intervention group ( N=23 ; 47.6 + 9.9 years ; 94.1 % female ; 33.2 + 4.5 kg/m2 ) ; ( 2 ) or wait-list control group ( N=17 ; 42.6 + 8.9 years ; 86.9 % female ; 31.7 + 4.9 kg/m2 ) . The intervention group received a theory-based , internet-delivered programme , a portable pedal machine at work and a pedometer for 12 weeks . The wait-list control group maintained their behaviours for 12 weeks . Outcome measures Primary ( sedentary and physical activity behaviour measured objective ly through StepWatch ) and secondary ( heart rate , blood pressure , height , weight , waist circumference , per cent body fat , cardiorespiratory fitness , fasting lipids ) outcomes were measured at baseline and postintervention ( 12 weeks ) . Exploratory outcomes including intervention compliance and process evaluation measures were also assessed postintervention . Results Compared to controls , the intervention group reduced daily sedentary time ( mean change ( 95%CI ) : −58.7 min/day ( −118.4 to 0.99 ; p<0.01 ) ) after adjusting for baseline values and monitor wear time . Intervention participants logged on to the website 71.3 % of all intervention days , used the pedal machine 37.7 % of all working intervention days and pedalled an average of 31.1 min/day . Conclusions These findings suggest that the intervention was engaging and result ed in reductions in daily sedentary time among full-time sedentary employees . These findings hold public health significance due to the growing number of sedentary jobs and the potential of these technologies in large-scale worksite programmes . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov # NCT01371084 Sitting on a therapy ball or st and ing may be a passive means of increasing energy expenditure throughout the workday . The purpose of this study was to determine the energy expenditure and liking of performing clerical work in various postures . Subjects included 24 men and women employed in sedentary clerical occupations .  Energy expenditure was measured while word processing in three st and ardized postures ; sitting in an office chair , sitting on a therapy ball , and st and ing . Adults ranked their comfort , fatigue , and liking of each posture and were asked to perform their choice of 20 min of additional clerical work in one of the postures . Energy expenditure was 4.1 kcal/h greater ( p ≤ 0.05 ) while performing clerical work while sitting on a therapy ball and st and ing than while sitting in an office chair . There was no difference in energy expenditure between the therapy ball and st and ing postures ( p ≥ 0.48 ) . Subjects also liked sitting on a therapy ball  as much as sitting in an office chair and liked sitting on a therapy ball  more than st and ing ( p ≤ 0.05 ) . More subjects chose to perform additional clerical work while seated on a therapy 
    Output:
    