human
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE Development of these guidelines is m and ated by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists ( AACE ) Board of Directors and the American College of Endocrinology ( ACE ) Board of Trustees and adheres to published AACE protocol s for the st and ardized production of clinical practice guidelines ( CPGs ) . METHODS Recommendations are based on diligent review of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors . RESULTS There are 9 broad clinical questions with 123 recommendation numbers that include 160 specific statements ( 85 [ 53.1 % ] strong [ Grade A ] ; 48 [ 30.0 % ] intermediate [ Grade B ] , and 11 [ 6.9 % ] weak [ Grade C ] , with 16 [ 10.0 % ] based on expert opinion [ Grade D ] ) that build a comprehensive medical care plan for obesity . There were 133 ( 83.1 % ) statements based on strong ( best evidence level [ BEL ] 1 = 79 [ 49.4 % ] ) or intermediate ( BEL 2 = 54 [ 33.7 % ] ) levels of scientific substantiation . There were 34 ( 23.6 % ) evidence -based recommendation grade s ( Grade s A-C = 144 ) that were adjusted based on subjective factors . Among the 1,790 reference citations used in this CPG , 524 ( 29.3 % ) were based on strong ( evidence level [ EL ] 1 ) , 605 ( 33.8 % ) were based on intermediate ( EL 2 ) , and 308 ( 17.2 % ) were based on weak ( EL 3 ) scientific studies , with 353 ( 19.7 % ) based on review s and opinions ( EL 4 ) . CONCLUSION The final recommendations recognize that obesity is a complex , adiposity-based chronic disease , where management targets both weight-related complications and adiposity to improve overall health and quality of life . The detailed evidence -based recommendations allow for nuanced clinical decision-making that addresses real-world medical care of patients with obesity , including screening , diagnosis , evaluation , selection of therapy , treatment goals , and individualization of care . The goal is to facilitate high- quality care of patients with obesity and provide a rational , scientific approach to management that optimizes health outcomes and safety . ABBREVIATIONS A1C = hemoglobin A1c AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists ACE = American College of Endocrinology ACSM = American College of Sports Medicine ADA = American Diabetes Association ADAPT = Arthritis , Diet , and Activity Promotion Trial ADHD = attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder AHA = American Heart Association AHEAD = Action for Health in Diabetes AHI = apnea-hypopnea index ALT = alanine aminotransferase AMA = American Medical Association ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker ART = assisted reproductive technology AUC = area under the curve BDI = Beck Depression Inventory BED = binge eating disorder BEL = best evidence level BLOOM = Behavioral Modification and Lorcaserin for Overweight and Obesity Management BLOSSOM = Behavioral Modification and Lorcaserin Second Study for Obesity Management BMI = body mass index BP = blood pressure C-SSRS = Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale CAD = coronary artery disease CARDIA = Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults CBT = cognitive behavioral therapy CCO = Consensus Conference on Obesity CHF = congestive heart failure CHO = carbohydrate CI = confidence interval COR-I = Contrave Obesity Research I CPG = clinical practice guideline CV = cardiovascular CVD = cardiovascular disease DASH = Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension DBP = diastolic blood pressure DEXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry DPP = Diabetes Prevention Program DSE = diabetes support and education EL = evidence level ED  = erectile dysfunction  ER = extended release EWL = excess weight loss FDA = Food and Drug Administration FDG = 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose GABA = gamma-aminobutyric acid GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease GI = gastrointestinal GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1 HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HDL-c = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HR = hazard ratio HTN = hypertension HUNT = Nord-Trøndelag Health Study ICSI = intracytoplasmic sperm injection IFG = impaired fasting glucose IGT = impaired glucose tolerance ILI = intensive lifestyle intervention IVF = in vitro fertilization LAGB = laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ing LDL-c = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol LES = lower esophageal sphincter LSG = laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy LV = left ventricle LVH = left ventricular hypertrophy LVBG = laparoscopic vertical b and ed gastroplasty MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events MAOI = monoamine oxidase inhibitor MI = myocardial infa rct ion MN RCT = meta- analysis of non-r and omized prospect i ve or case-controlled trials MRI = magnetic resonance imaging MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acid NAFLD = nonalcoholic fatty liver disease NASH = nonalcoholic steatohepatitis NES = night eating syndrome NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys NHLBI = National Heart , Lung , and Blood Institute NHS = Nurses ' Health Study NICE = National Institute for Health and Care Excellence OA = osteoarthritis OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test OR = odds ratio OSA = obstructive sleep apnea PHQ-9 = Patient Health Question naire PCOS = polycystic ovary syndrome PCP = primary care physician POMC = pro-opiomelanocortin POWER = Practice -Based Opportunities for Weight Reduction PPI = proton pump inhibitor PRIDE = Program to Reduce Incontinence by Diet and Exercise PSA = prostate specific antigen QOL = quality of life RA = receptor agonist RCT = r and omized controlled trial ROC = receiver operator characteristic RR = relative risk RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass  SAD = sagittal abdominal diameter SBP = systolic blood pressure SCOUT = Sibutramine Cardiovascular Outcome Trial SG = sleeve gastrectomy SHBG = sex hormonebinding globulin SIEDY = Structured Interview on Erectile Dysfunction SNRI = serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors SOS = Swedish Obese Subjects SS = surveillance study SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors STORM = Sibutramine Trial on Obesity Reduction and Maintenance TCA = tricyclic antidepressant TONE = Trial of Nonpharmacologic Intervention in the Elderly TOS = The Obesity Society T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus UKPDS = United Kingdom Prospect i ve Diabetes Study U.S = United States VAT = visceral adipose tissue VLDL = very low-density lipoprotein WC = waist circumference WHO = World Health Organization WHR = waist-hip ratio WHtR = waist-to-height ratio WMD = weighted mean difference WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index XENDOS = XEnical in the Prevention of Diabetes in Obese Subjects Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) is not optimal . Without transparent reporting , readers can not judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic review s. Recent method ological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects . Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs , which are considered the gold st and ard for evaluating interventions because of their ability to minimise or avoid bias . A group of scientists and editors developed the CONSORT ( Consoli date d St and ards of Reporting Trials ) statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs . It was first published in 1996 and up date d in 2001 . The statement consists of a checklist and flow diagram that authors can use for reporting an RCT . Many leading medical journals and major international editorial groups have endorsed the CONSORT statement . The statement facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of RCTs . During the 2001 CONSORT revision , it became clear that explanation and elaboration of the principles underlying the CONSORT statement would help investigators and others to write or appraise trial reports . A CONSORT explanation and elaboration article was published in 2001 alongside the 2001 version of the CONSORT statement . After an expert meeting in January 2007 , the CONSORT statement has been further revised and is published as the CONSORT 2010 Statement . This up date improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition , such as selective outcome reporting bias . This explanatory and elaboration document-intended to enhance the use , underst and ing , and dissemination of the CONSORT statement-has also been extensively revised . It presents the meaning and rationale for each new and up date d checklist item providing examples of good reporting and , where possible , references to relevant empirical studies . Several examples of flow diagrams are included . The CONSORT 2010 Statement , this revised explanatory and elaboration document , and the associated website ( www.consort-statement.org ) should be helpful re sources to improve reporting of r and omised trials OBJECTIVE Few studies examined the association between time-of-day of nutrient intake and the metabolic syndrome . Our goal was to compare a weight loss diet with high caloric intake during breakfast to an isocaloric diet with high caloric intake at dinner . DESIGN AND METHODS Overweight and obese women ( BMI 32.4 ± 1.8 kg/m(2 ) ) with metabolic syndrome were r and omized into two isocaloric ( ~1400 kcal ) weight loss groups , a breakfast ( BF ) ( 700 kcal breakfast , 500 kcal lunch , 200 kcal dinner ) or a dinner ( D ) group ( 200 kcal breakfast , 500 kcal lunch , 700 kcal dinner ) for 12 weeks . RESULTS The BF group showed greater weight loss and waist circumference reduction . Although fasting glucose , insulin , and ghrelin were reduced in both groups , fasting glucose , insulin , and HOMA-IR decreased significantly to a greater extent in the BF group . Mean triglyceride levels decreased by 33.6 % in the BF group , but increased by 14.6 % in the D group . Oral glucose tolerance test led to a greater decrease of glucose and insulin in the BF group . In response to meal challenges , the overall daily glucose , insulin , ghrelin , and mean hunger scores were significantly lower , whereas mean satiety scores were significantly higher in the BF group . CONCLUSIONS High-calorie breakfast with reduced intake at dinner is beneficial and might be a useful alternative for the management of obesity and metabolic syndrome BACKGROUND Preserving fat-free mass ( FFM ) during weight loss is important in older adults . The purpose was to examine a low-fat diet ( LFD ) versus a carbohydrate-restricted diet ( CRD ) with and without progressive resistance exercise ( PRE ) on preservation of FFM in older men with metabolic syndrome . METHODS A total of 42 men ( 59±7 years ) were matched [ body mass index ( BMI ) ] and r and omized to LFD , LFD&PRE , CRD , and CRD&PRE . PRE groups performed supervised strength training three times per week . Body weight , composition , metabolic syndrome criteria , and strength were measured at baseline and week 12 . A 3-day diet record was kept at baseline and at weeks 1 , 6 , and 12 . RESULTS Attrition ( 24 % ) was similar between groups . Depicted as % carbohydrate : fat : protein , the intervention diet was : LFD=55:24:18 , LFD&PRE=57:20:20 , CRD=16:54:28 , and CRD&PRE=12:56:31  . Weight ( lb ) decreased similarly in all groups ( LFD , -18.0±7.4 ; LFD&PRE , -19.8±12.8 ; CRD , -20.2±8.0 ; CRD&PRE , -22.7±6.0 ; P<0.001 ) , and number of participants with metabolic syndrome decreased in all groups ( -3 , -6 , -3 , -4 , respectively ) . Percent of weight loss from appendicular FFM was 27.5 % , 15.9 % , 15.7 % , and 17.3 % respectively . A trend was found when comparing LFD and LFD&PRE ( P=0.068 ) , and when comparing LFD&CRD ( P=0.072 ) . Triglycerides improved more for the LFD&PRE , CRD , and CRD&PRE groups compared to the LFD group ( P<0.05 ) . Improvements in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were better in the CRD&PRE group ( 4.1±5.1 mg/dL ) versus the LFD group ( -5.0±5.9 mg/dL 
    Output:
    
agent
4 ) Conclusions : The analysis of the information here reported sheds light for the design of future clinical trials in adults with MS .
The best anthropometric parameters and units of measurement to monitor the interventions are related to dietary and physical exercise interventions .
***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE Development of these guidelines is m and ated by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists ( AACE ) Board of Directors and the American College of Endocrinology ( ACE ) Board of Trustees and adheres to published AACE protocol s for the st and ardized production of clinical practice guidelines ( CPGs ) . METHODS Recommendations are based on diligent review of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors . RESULTS There are 9 broad clinical questions with 123 recommendation numbers that include 160 specific statements ( 85 [ 53.1 % ] strong [ Grade A ] ; 48 [ 30.0 % ] intermediate [ Grade B ] , and 11 [ 6.9 % ] weak [ Grade C ] , with 16 [ 10.0 % ] based on expert opinion [ Grade D ] ) that build a comprehensive medical care plan for obesity . There were 133 ( 83.1 % ) statements based on strong ( best evidence level [ BEL ] 1 = 79 [ 49.4 % ] ) or intermediate ( BEL 2 = 54 [ 33.7 % ] ) levels of scientific substantiation . There were 34 ( 23.6 % ) evidence -based recommendation grade s ( Grade s A-C = 144 ) that were adjusted based on subjective factors . Among the 1,790 reference citations used in this CPG , 524 ( 29.3 % ) were based on strong ( evidence level [ EL ] 1 ) , 605 ( 33.8 % ) were based on intermediate ( EL 2 ) , and 308 ( 17.2 % ) were based on weak ( EL 3 ) scientific studies , with 353 ( 19.7 % ) based on review s and opinions ( EL 4 ) . CONCLUSION The final recommendations recognize that obesity is a complex , adiposity-based chronic disease , where management targets both weight-related complications and adiposity to improve overall health and quality of life . The detailed evidence -based recommendations allow for nuanced clinical decision-making that addresses real-world medical care of patients with obesity , including screening , diagnosis , evaluation , selection of therapy , treatment goals , and individualization of care . The goal is to facilitate high- quality care of patients with obesity and provide a rational , scientific approach to management that optimizes health outcomes and safety . ABBREVIATIONS A1C = hemoglobin A1c AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists ACE = American College of Endocrinology ACSM = American College of Sports Medicine ADA = American Diabetes Association ADAPT = Arthritis , Diet , and Activity Promotion Trial ADHD = attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder AHA = American Heart Association AHEAD = Action for Health in Diabetes AHI = apnea-hypopnea index ALT = alanine aminotransferase AMA = American Medical Association ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker ART = assisted reproductive technology AUC = area under the curve BDI = Beck Depression Inventory BED = binge eating disorder BEL = best evidence level BLOOM = Behavioral Modification and Lorcaserin for Overweight and Obesity Management BLOSSOM = Behavioral Modification and Lorcaserin Second Study for Obesity Management BMI = body mass index BP = blood pressure C-SSRS = Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale CAD = coronary artery disease CARDIA = Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults CBT = cognitive behavioral therapy CCO = Consensus Conference on Obesity CHF = congestive heart failure CHO = carbohydrate CI = confidence interval COR-I = Contrave Obesity Research I CPG = clinical practice guideline CV = cardiovascular CVD = cardiovascular disease DASH = Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension DBP = diastolic blood pressure DEXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry DPP = Diabetes Prevention Program DSE = diabetes support and education EL = evidence level ED  = erectile dysfunction  ER = extended release EWL = excess weight loss FDA = Food and Drug Administration FDG = 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose GABA = gamma-aminobutyric acid GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease GI = gastrointestinal GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1 HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HDL-c = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HR = hazard ratio HTN = hypertension HUNT = Nord-Trøndelag Health Study ICSI = intracytoplasmic sperm injection IFG = impaired fasting glucose IGT = impaired glucose tolerance ILI = intensive lifestyle intervention IVF = in vitro fertilization LAGB = laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ing LDL-c = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol LES = lower esophageal sphincter LSG = laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy LV = left ventricle LVH = left ventricular hypertrophy LVBG = laparoscopic vertical b and ed gastroplasty MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events MAOI = monoamine oxidase inhibitor MI = myocardial infa rct ion MN RCT = meta- analysis of non-r and omized prospect i ve or case-controlled trials MRI = magnetic resonance imaging MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acid NAFLD = nonalcoholic fatty liver disease NASH = nonalcoholic steatohepatitis NES = night eating syndrome NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys NHLBI = National Heart , Lung , and Blood Institute NHS = Nurses ' Health Study NICE = National Institute for Health and Care Excellence OA = osteoarthritis OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test OR = odds ratio OSA = obstructive sleep apnea PHQ-9 = Patient Health Question naire PCOS = polycystic ovary syndrome PCP = primary care physician POMC = pro-opiomelanocortin POWER = Practice -Based Opportunities for Weight Reduction PPI = proton pump inhibitor PRIDE = Program to Reduce Incontinence by Diet and Exercise PSA = prostate specific antigen QOL = quality of life RA = receptor agonist RCT = r and omized controlled trial ROC = receiver operator characteristic RR = relative risk RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass  SAD = sagittal abdominal diameter SBP = systolic blood pressure SCOUT = Sibutramine Cardiovascular Outcome Trial SG = sleeve gastrectomy SHBG = sex hormonebinding globulin SIEDY = Structured Interview on Erectile Dysfunction SNRI = serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors SOS = Swedish Obese Subjects SS = surveillance study SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors STORM = Sibutramine Trial on Obesity Reduction and Maintenance TCA = tricyclic antidepressant TONE = Trial of Nonpharmacologic Intervention in the Elderly TOS = The Obesity Society T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus UKPDS = United Kingdom Prospect i ve Diabetes Study U.S = United States VAT = visceral adipose tissue VLDL = very low-density lipoprotein WC = waist circumference WHO = World Health Organization WHR = waist-hip ratio WHtR = waist-to-height ratio WMD = weighted mean difference WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index XENDOS = XEnical in the Prevention of Diabetes in Obese Subjects Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) is not optimal . Without transparent reporting , readers can not judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic review s. Recent method ological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects . Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs , which are considered the gold st and ard for evaluating interventions because of their ability to minimise or avoid bias . A group of scientists and editors developed the CONSORT ( Consoli date d St and ards of Reporting Trials ) statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs . It was first published in 1996 and up date d in 2001 . The statement consists of a checklist and flow diagram that authors can use for reporting an RCT . Many leading medical journals and major international editorial groups have endorsed the CONSORT statement . The statement facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of RCTs . During the 2001 CONSORT revision , it became clear that explanation and elaboration of the principles underlying the CONSORT statement would help investigators and others to write or appraise trial reports . A CONSORT explanation and elaboration article was published in 2001 alongside the 2001 version of the CONSORT statement . After an expert meeting in January 2007 , the CONSORT statement has been further revised and is published as the CONSORT 2010 Statement . This up date improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition , such as selective outcome reporting bias . This explanatory and elaboration document-intended to enhance the use , underst and ing , and dissemination of the CONSORT statement-has also been extensively revised . It presents the meaning and rationale for each new and up date d checklist item providing examples of good reporting and , where possible , references to relevant empirical studies . Several examples of flow diagrams are included . The CONSORT 2010 Statement , this revised explanatory and elaboration document , and the associated website ( www.consort-statement.org ) should be helpful re sources to improve reporting of r and omised trials OBJECTIVE Few studies examined the association between time-of-day of nutrient intake and the metabolic syndrome . Our goal was to compare a weight loss diet with high caloric intake during breakfast to an isocaloric diet with high caloric intake at dinner . DESIGN AND METHODS Overweight and obese women ( BMI 32.4 ± 1.8 kg/m(2 ) ) with metabolic syndrome were r and omized into two isocaloric ( ~1400 kcal ) weight loss groups , a breakfast ( BF ) ( 700 kcal breakfast , 500 kcal lunch , 200 kcal dinner ) or a dinner ( D ) group ( 200 kcal breakfast , 500 kcal lunch , 700 kcal dinner ) for 12 weeks . RESULTS The BF group showed greater weight loss and waist circumference reduction . Although fasting glucose , insulin , and ghrelin were reduced in both groups , fasting glucose , insulin , and HOMA-IR decreased significantly to a greater extent in the BF group . Mean triglyceride levels decreased by 33.6 % in the BF group , but increased by 14.6 % in the D group . Oral glucose tolerance test led to a greater decrease of glucose and insulin in the BF group . In response to meal challenges , the overall daily glucose , insulin , ghrelin , and mean hunger scores were significantly lower , whereas mean satiety scores were significantly higher in the BF group . CONCLUSIONS High-calorie breakfast with reduced intake at dinner is beneficial and might be a useful alternative for the management of obesity and metabolic syndrome BACKGROUND Preserving fat-free mass ( FFM ) during weight loss is important in older adults . The purpose was to examine a low-fat diet ( LFD ) versus a carbohydrate-restricted diet ( CRD ) with and without progressive resistance exercise ( PRE ) on preservation of FFM in older men with metabolic syndrome . METHODS A total of 42 men ( 59±7 years ) were matched [ body mass index ( BMI ) ] and r and omized to LFD , LFD&PRE , CRD , and CRD&PRE . PRE groups performed supervised strength training three times per week . Body weight , composition , metabolic syndrome criteria , and strength were measured at baseline and week 12 . A 3-day diet record was kept at baseline and at weeks 1 , 6 , and 12 . RESULTS Attrition ( 24 % ) was similar between groups . Depicted as % carbohydrate : fat : protein , the intervention diet was : LFD=55:24:18 , LFD&PRE=57:20:20 , CRD=16:54:28 , and CRD&PRE=12:56:31  . Weight ( lb ) decreased similarly in all groups ( LFD , -18.0±7.4 ; LFD&PRE , -19.8±12.8 ; CRD , -20.2±8.0 ; CRD&PRE , -22.7±6.0 ; P<0.001 ) , and number of participants with metabolic syndrome decreased in all groups ( -3 , -6 , -3 , -4 , respectively ) . Percent of weight loss from appendicular FFM was 27.5 % , 15.9 % , 15.7 % , and 17.3 % respectively . A trend was found when comparing LFD and LFD&PRE ( P=0.068 ) , and when comparing LFD&CRD ( P=0.072 ) . Triglycerides improved more for the LFD&PRE , CRD , and CRD&PRE groups compared to the LFD group ( P<0.05 ) . Improvements in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were better in the CRD&PRE group ( 4.1±5.1 mg/dL ) versus the LFD group ( -5.0±5.9 mg/dL 
    Output:
    