***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to measure the agreement , reliability , construct validity , and feasibility of a measurement tool to assess  systematic review s ( AMSTAR ) . STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We r and omly selected 30 systematic review s from a data base . Each was assessed by two review ers using : ( 1 ) the enhanced quality assessment question naire ( Overview of Quality Assessment Question naire [ OQAQ ] ) ; ( 2 ) Sacks ' instrument ; and ( 3 ) our newly developed measurement tool ( AMSTAR ) . We report on reliability ( interobserver kappas of the 11 AMSTAR items ) , intraclass correlation coefficients ( ICCs ) of the sum scores , construct validity ( ICCs of the sum scores of AMSTAR compared with those of other instruments ) , and completion times . RESULTS The interrater agreement of the individual items of AMSTAR was substantial with a mean kappa of 0.70 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] : 0.57 , 0.83 ) ( range : 0.38 - 1.0 ) . Kappas recorded for the other instruments were 0.63 ( 95 % CI : 0.38 , 0.78 ) for enhanced OQAQ and 0.40 ( 95 % CI : 0.29 , 0.50 ) for the Sacks ' instrument . The ICC of the total score for AMSTAR was 0.84 ( 95 % CI : 0.65 , 0.92 ) compared with 0.91 ( 95 % CI : 0.82 , 0.96 ) for OQAQ and 0.86 ( 95 % CI : 0.71 , 0.94 ) for the Sacks ' instrument . AMSTAR proved easy to apply , each review taking about 15 minutes to complete . CONCLUSIONS AMSTAR has good agreement , reliability , construct validity , and feasibility . These findings need confirmation by a broader range of assessors and a more diverse range of review Four experiments explored the interrelations between working memory , attention , and eye movements .  Observers had to identify a tilted line amongst vertical distractors .  Each line was surrounded by a colored shape that could be precued by a matching item held in memory . Relative to a neutral baseline , in which no shapes matched the memory item , search was more efficient when the memory cue matched the shape containing the target , and it was less efficient when the cued stimulus contained a distractor . Cuing affected the shortest reaction times and the first saccade in search . The effect occurred even when the memory cue was always invalid but not when the cue did not have to be held in memory . There was also no evidence for priming effects between consecutive trials . The results suggest that there can be early , involuntary top-down directing of attention to a stimulus matching the contents of working memory Because there have been few longitudinal investigations of integrative etiological theories of bulimia nervosa , this study prospect ively tested the dual-pathway model using r and om regression growth curve models and data from a 3-wave community sample of adolescent girls ( N = 231 ) . Initial pressure to be thin and thin-ideal internalization predicted subsequent growth in body dissatisfaction , initial body dissatisfaction predicted growth in dieting and negative affect , and initial dieting and negative affect predicted growth in bulimic symptoms . There was prospect i ve evidence for most of the hypothesized mediational effects . Results are consistent with the assertion that pressure to be thin , thin-ideal internalization , body dissatisfaction , dieting , and negative affect are risk factors for bulimic pathology and provide support for the dual-pathway model BACKGROUND Attention bias modification treatment ( ABMT ) is a novel treatment for anxiety disorders . Although a number of other meta-analytic review s exist , the purpose of the present meta- analysis is to examine issues unaddressed in prior review s. Specifically , the review estimates the efficacy of ABMT in clinical ly anxious patients and examines the effect of delivery context ( clinic vs. home ) on symptom reduction . METHODS A literature search using PsychInfo and Web of Science data bases was performed . Only r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) examining dot-probe-based ABMT in clinical ly diagnosed anxious patients were included . From 714 articles located through the search , 36 ABMT studies were identified and 11 studies met inclusion criteria ( N = 589 patients ) . RESULTS ABMT was associated with greater clinician-rated reductions in anxiety symptoms relative to control training : between-groups effect ( d = 0.42 , P = .001 , confidence interval ( CI ) = 0.18 - 0.66 ) , contrast of within-group effects ( Q = 7.25 , P < .01 ) . More patients in the treatment group no longer met formal diagnostic criteria for their anxiety disorder posttreatment relative to patients in the control condition ( P < .05 ) . Analyses of patients ' self-reported anxiety were nonsignificant for the between-groups contrast ( P = .35 ) , and were at a trend level of significance for the contrast between the within-group effects ( P = .06 ) . Moderation analysis of the between-groups effect revealed a significant effect for ABMT delivered in the clinic ( d = 0.34 , P = 0.01 , CI = 0.07 - 0.62 ) , and a nonsignificant effect for ABMT delivered at home ( d = -0.10 , P = 0.40 , CI = -0.33 - 0.13 ) . CONCLUSIONS The current meta- analysis provides support for ABMT as a novel evidence d-based treatment for anxiety disorders . Overall , ABMT effects are mainly evident when it is delivered in the clinic and when clinical outcome is evaluated by a clinician . More RCTs of ABMT in specific anxiety disorders are warranted 
    Output:
    
METHOD Electronic data bases were queried for review s of neurocognitive domains ( i.e. , inhibitory control , decision-making , central coherence , set-shifting , working memory , and attention bias ) in EDs , which identified 28 systematic and meta-analytic review s. RESULTS Broadly , the literature indicates deficits across these neurocognitive domains in EDs , though heterogeneity was noted in the magnitude of these effects , which varied to some extent across ED subtypes , sample characteristics , and method ological approaches .