***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Honey dressing has been used to promote wound healing for years but scanty scientific studies did not provide enough evidence s to justify it benefits in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers . We conducted a prospect i ve study to compare the effect of honey dressing  for  Wagner 's grade -II diabetic foot ulcers  with controlled dressing group ( povidone iodine followed by normal saline ) . Surgical debridement and appropriate antibiotics were prescribed in all patients . There were 30 patients age between 31 to 65-years-old ( mean of 52.1 years ) . The mean healing time in the st and ard dressing group was 15.4 days ( range 9 - 36 days ) compared to 14.4 days ( range 7 - 26 days ) in the honey group ( p < 0.005 ) . In conclusion , ulcer healing was not significantly different in both study groups . Honey dressing is a safe alternative dressing for Wagner grade -II diabetic foot ulcers CONTEXT Previous studies indicate that industry-sponsored trials tend to draw proindustry conclusions . OBJECTIVE To explore whether the association between funding and conclusions in r and omized drug trials reflects treatment effects or adverse events . DESIGN Observational study of 370 r and omized drug trials included in meta-analyses from Cochrane review s selected from the Cochrane Library , May 2001 . From a r and om sample of 167 Cochrane review s , 25 contained eligible meta-analyses ( assessed a binary outcome ; pooled at least 5 full-paper trials of which at least 1 reported adequate and 1 reported inadequate allocation concealment ) . The primary binary outcome from each meta- analysis was considered the primary outcome for all trials included in each meta- analysis . The association between funding and conclusions was analyzed by logistic regression with adjustment for treatment effect , adverse events , and additional confounding factors ( method ological quality , control intervention , sample size , publication year , and place of publication ) . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Conclusions in trials , classified into whether the experimental drug was recommended as the treatment of choice or not . RESULTS The experimental drug was recommended as treatment of choice in 16 % of trials funded by nonprofit organizations , 30 % of trials not reporting funding , 35 % of trials funded by both nonprofit and for-profit organizations , and 51 % of trials funded by for-profit organizations ( P<.001 ; chi2 test ) . Logistic regression analyses indicated that funding , treatment effect , and double blinding were the only significant predictors of conclusions . Adjusted analyses showed that trials funded by for-profit organizations were significantly more likely to recommend the experimental drug as treatment of choice ( odds ratio , 5.3 ; 95 % confidence interval , 2.0 - 14.4 ) compared with trials funded by nonprofit organizations . This association did not appear to reflect treatment effect or adverse events . CONCLUSIONS Conclusions in trials funded by for-profit organizations may be more positive due to biased interpretation of trial results . Readers should carefully evaluate whether conclusions in r and omized trials are supported by data : In recent years , skin grafting has evolved from the initial autograft and allograft preparations to biosynthetic and tissue-engineered living skin replacements . This review details the pioneering work of numerous investigators that led to the following precursors of tissue-engineered skin replacement : cultured autologous keratinocyte grafts , cultured allogeneic keratinocyte grafts , autologous/allogeneic composites , acellular collagen matrices , and cellular matrices . It also discusses the rationale for the development of the newer products and describes the technical advances leading to the development of Apligraf , a tissue-engineered human skin product OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new ionic silver alginate matrix ( Askina Calgitrol Ag ) with that of a st and ard silver-free alginate dressing ( Algosteril ) . METHOD Patients with locally infected chronic wounds ( pressure ulcers , venous or mixed aetiology leg ulcers , diabetic foot ulcers ) or acute wounds were eligible for this prospect i ve , open-label , controlled and r and omised trial . Patients were r and omised to receive one of the two dressings for a two-week period . Criteria of efficacy were based on the evolution , from day 1 to day 15 , of local signs of infection using a clinical score ranging from 0 to 18 , and the evolution of the bacteriological status for each wound . The latter was determined by ( blind ) bacteriological examinations of results obtained from two biopsies performed at days 1 and 15 . A three-point scale ( deterioration , unchanged , improvement ) was also used . Acceptability , usefulness and tolerance were also assessed . RESULTS Forty-two patients ( 20 women and 22 men , 68.9 + /- 18.8 and 66.5 + /- 15.7 years old respectively ) were r and omly assigned to receive either Askina Calgitrol Ag ( n=20 ) or Algosteril ( n=22 ) . Most had chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers ( 57 % ) or venous or mixed aetiology leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers ( 29 % ) ; few had acute wounds ( 14 % ) .  Clinical scores of infection were comparable in both groups at inclusion , 8.9 + /- 2.4 and 8.6 + /- 3.2 in the Askina Calgitrol Ag group and the Algosteril group respectively ( not significant ) , but decreased significantly in both groups at day 15 , 3.8 + /- 2.9 in the Askina Calgitrol Ag group ( p=0.001 ) and 3.8 + /- 3.4 in the Algosteril group ( p=0.007 ) . There was no significant difference between the two groups at day 15 . Although there was also no significant difference in bacteriological status between the treatment groups , a trend in favour of Askina Calgitrol Ag was found for the relative risk of improvement , especially in patients who were not treated with antibiotics either at the beginning of the study or during it . No differences between groups were observed regarding local tolerance , acceptability and usefulness of the dressings . CONCLUSION The regression of local signs of infection , local tolerance , acceptability and usefulness were similar for the two dressings . However , Askina Calgitrol Ag improved the bacteriological status of the wounds . Further trials are required to show that it has a positive impact on the healing process Summary The EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study involved the examination of 3250 r and omly selected insulin-dependent diabetic patients , from 31 centres in 16 European countries . Part of the examination included an assessment of neurological function including neuropathic symptoms and physical signs , vibration perception threshold , tests of autonomic function and the prevalence of impotence . The prevalence of diabetic neuropathy across Europe was 28 % with no significant geographical differences . Significant correlations were observed between the presence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with age ( p < 0.05 ) , duration of diabetes ( p < 0.001 ) , quality of metabolic control ( p < 0.001 ) , height ( p < 0.01 ) , the presence of background or proliferative diabetic retinopathy ( p < 0.01 ) , cigarette smoking ( p < 0.001 ) , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( p < 0.001 ) and the presence of cardiovascular disease ( p < 0.05 ) , thus confirming previous associations . New associations have been identified from this study – namely with elevated diastolic blood pressure ( p < 0.05 ) , the presence of severe ketoacidosis ( p < 0.001 ) , an increase in the levels of fasting triglyceride ( p < 0.001 ) , and the presence of microalbuminuria ( p < 0.01 ) . All the data were adjusted for age , duration of diabetes and HbA1c . Although alcohol intake correlated with absence of leg reflexes and autonomic dysfunction , there was no overall association of alcohol consumption and neuropathy . The reported problems of impotence were extremely variable between centres , suggesting many cultural and attitudinal differences in the collection of such information in different European countries . In conclusion , this study has identified previously known and new potential risk factors for the development of diabetic peripheral neuropathy . [ Diabetologia ( 1996 ) 39 : 1377–1384 OBJECTIVE : A r and omized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a polyhexamethylene biguanide ( PHMB ) foam dressing compared with a similar non-antimicrobial foam for the treatment of  superficial bacterial burden , wound-associated pain , and reduction in wound size . SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS : This study was conducted in 2 wound healing clinics-a university hospital-based clinic and a community-based clinic . Forty-five chronic wound subjects , stratified to either foot or leg ulcers , were followed for 5 weeks . METHODS : A multicenter , prospect i ve , double-blind , pilot , r and omized controlled clinical trial with 3 study visits ( Weeks 0 , 2 , 4 ) documented pain and local wound characteristics using NERDS and STONEES clinical criteria to determine superficial bacterial damage or deep/surrounding infection . RESULTS : The use of PHMB foam dressing was a significant predictor of reduced wound superficial bacterial burden ( P = .016 ) at week 4 as compared with the foam alone . Pain reduction was also statistically significant at week 2 ( P = .0006 ) and at week 4 ( P = .02 ) in favor of the PHMB foam dressings . Polymicrobial organisms were recovered at week 4 in 5.3 % in the PHMB foam dressing group versus 33 % in the control group ( P = .04 ) . Subjects r and omized to the PHMB foam dressing had a 35 % median reduction in wound size by week 4 , compared with 28 % in the control group . CONCLUSIONS : PHMB foam dressing successfully reduced chronic wound pain and bacterial burden OBJECTIVES To determine the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three dressing products , N-A , Inadine and Aquacel , for patients with diabetic foot ulcers , as well as the feasibility and consequences of less frequent dressing changes by health-care professionals . DESIGN A multicentre , prospect i ve , observer-blinded , parallel group , r and omised controlled trial , with three arms . SETTING Established expert multidisciplinary clinics for the management of diabetic foot ulcers across the UK . PARTICIPANTS Patients over age 18 with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with a chronic ( present for at least 6 weeks ) full-thickness foot ulcer ( on or below the malleoli ) not penetrating to tendon , periosteum or bone , and with a cross-sectional area between 25 and 2500 mm(2 ) . INTERVENTIONS Participants were r and omised 1:1:1 to treatment with one of N-A ( a non-adherent , knitted , viscose filament gauze ) , Inadine ( an iodine-impregnated dressing ) , both traditional dressings , or Aquacel , a newer product . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the number of ulcers healed in each group at week 24 . Secondary measures included time to healing , new ulcerations , major and minor amputations , and episodes of secondary infection . RESULTS A total of 317 patients were r and omised . After 88 withdrawals , 229 remained evaluable . A greater proportion of smaller ( 25 - 100 mm(2 ) ulcers healed within the specified time ( 48.3 % versus 37.3 % ; p = 0.048 ) . There was , however , no difference between the three dressings in terms of percentage healed by 24 weeks , or in the mean time to healing , whether analysed on the basis of intention to treat ( Inadine 44.4 % , N-A 38.7 % , Aquacel 44.7 % ; not significant ) or per protocol ( Inadine 55.2 % , N-A 59.4 % , Aquacel 63.0 % ; not significant ) . There was no difference in the quality of healing , as reflected in the incidence of recurrence within 12 weeks . Likewise , there was no difference in the incidence of adverse events , although a greater proportion of those r and omised to the non-adherent dressings were withdrawn from the study ( 34.9 % versus 29.1 % Aquacel and 19.4 % Inadine ; p = 0.038 ) . The only statistically significant difference found in the health economic analysis was the cost associated with the provision of dressings ( mean cost per patient : N-A 14.85 pounds , Inadine 17.48 pounds , Aquacel 43.60 pounds ) . The higher cost of Aquacel was not offset by the fewer dressings required . There was no difference in measures of either generic or condition-specific measures of quality of life . However , there was a significant difference in the change in pain associated with dressing changes between the first and second visits , with least pain reported by those receiving non-adherent dressings ( p = 0.012 ) . There was no difference in the costs of professional time , and this may relate to the number of dressing changes undertaken by non-professionals . Fifty-one per cent of all participants had at least one dressing change undertaken by themselves or a non-professional carer , although this ranged from 22 % to 82 % between the different centres . CONCLUSIONS As there was no difference in effectiveness 
    Output:
    
There was no statistically significant difference in the number of diabetic foot ulcers healed when foam dressings were compared with hydrocolloid ( matrix ) dressings .