***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Evidence for improved outcomes for people with dementia through provision of person-centred care and dementia-care mapping is largely observational . We aim ed to do a large , r and omised comparison of person-centred care , dementia-care mapping , and usual care . METHODS In a cluster r and omised controlled trial , urban residential sites were r and omly assigned to person-centred care , dementia-care mapping , or usual care . Carers received training and support in either intervention or continued usual care . Treatment allocation was masked to assessors . The primary outcome was agitation measured with the Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory ( CMAI ) . Secondary outcomes included psychiatric symptoms including hallucinations , neuropsychological status , quality of life , falls , and cost of treatment . Outcome measures were assessed before and directly after 4 months of intervention , and at 4 months of follow-up . Hierarchical linear models were used to test treatment and time effects . Analysis was by intention to treat . This trial is registered with the Australia and New Zeal and Clinical Trials Registry , number ACTRN12608000084381 . FINDINGS 15 care sites with 289 residents were r and omly assigned . Pairwise contrasts revealed that at follow-up , and relative to usual care , CMAI score was lower in sites providing mapping ( mean difference 10.9 , 95 % CI 0.7 - 21.1 ; p=0.04 ) and person-centred care ( 13.6 , 3.3 - 23.9 ; p=0.01 ) . Compared with usual care , fewer falls were recorded in sites that used mapping ( 0.24 , 0.08 - 0.40 ; p=0.02 ) but there were more falls with person-centred care ( 0.15 , 0.02 - 0.28 ; p=0.03 ) . There were no other significant effects . INTERPRETATION Person-centred care and dementia-care mapping both seem to reduce agitation in people with dementia in residential care Background Falls are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in dementia , but there have been no prospect i ve studies of risk factors for falling specific to this patient population , and no successful falls intervention/prevention trials . This prospect i ve study aim ed to identify modifiable risk factors for falling in older people with mild to moderate dementia . Methods and Findings 179 participants aged over 65 years were recruited from outpatient clinics in the UK ( 38 Alzheimer 's disease ( AD ) , 32 Vascular dementia ( VAD ) , 30 Dementia with Lewy bodies ( DLB ) , 40 Parkinson 's disease with dementia ( PDD ) , 39 healthy controls ) . A multifactorial assessment of baseline risk factors was performed and fall diaries were completed prospect ively for 12 months . Dementia participants experienced nearly 8 times more incident falls ( 9118/1000 person-years ) than controls ( 1023/1000 person-years ; incidence density ratio : 7.58 , 3.11–18.5 ) . In dementia , significant univariate predictors of sustaining at least one fall included diagnosis of Lewy body disorder ( proportional hazard ratio ( HR ) adjusted for age and sex : 3.33 , 2.11–5.26 ) , and history of falls in the preceding 12 months ( HR : 2.52 , 1.52–4.17 ) . In multivariate analyses , significant potentially modifiable predictors were symptomatic orthostatic hypotension ( HR : 2.13 , 1.19–3.80 ) , autonomic symptom score ( HR per point 0–36 : 1.055 , 1.012–1.099 ) , and Cornell depression score ( HR per point 0–40 : 1.053 , 1.01–1.099 ) . Higher levels of physical activity were protective ( HR per point 0–9 : 0.827 , 0.716–0.956 ) . Conclusions The management of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension , autonomic symptoms and depression , and the encouragement of physical activity may provide the core elements for the most fruitful strategy to reduce falls in people with dementia . R and omised controlled trials to assess such a strategy are a priority OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted , nonpharmaceutical intervention on incidence of falls and fallers . DESIGN Prospect i ve , cluster-r and omized , controlled 12-month trial . SETTING Six community nursing homes in Germany . PARTICIPANTS Long-stay residents ( n = 981 ) aged 60 and older ; mean age 85 ; 79 % female . INTERVENTIONS Staff and resident education on fall prevention , advice on environmental adaptations , progressive balance and resistance training , and hip protectors . MEASUREMENTS Falls , fallers , and fractures . RESULTS The incidence density rate of falls per 1,000 resident years ( RY ) was 2,558 for the control group ( CG ) and 1,399 for the intervention group ( IG ) ( relative risk ( RR ) = 0.55 , 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) = 0.41 - 0.73 ) . Two hundred forty-seven ( 52.3 % ) fallers were detected in the CG and 188 ( 36.9 % ) in the IG ( RR = 0.75 , 95 % CI = 0.57 - 0.98 ) . The incidence density rate of frequent fallers ( > 2/year ) was 115 ( 24.4 % ) for the CG and 66 ( 13.0 % ) for the IG ( RR = 0.56 , 95 % CI = 0.35 - 0.89 ) . The incidence density rate of hip fractures per 1,000 RY was 39 for the CG and 43 for the IG ( RR = 1.11 , 95 % CI = 0.49 - 2.51 ) . Other fractures were diagnosed with an incidence density rate of 52 per 1,000 RY for CG and 41 per 1,000 RY for IG ( RR = 0.78 , 95 % CI = 0.57 - 1.07 ) . CONCLUSION The incidence density rate of falls and fallers differed considerably between the control and intervention groups . The study was underpowered to demonstrate a significant difference of hip or nonhip fractures . Because of a low fracture rate in both groups , the investigation of fracture rates would have required a larger sample size to detect an effect of the intervention BACKGROUND Falls are a common adverse event during hospitalization of older adults , and few interventions have been shown to prevent them . METHODS This study was a 3-group r and omized trial to evaluate the efficacy of 2 forms of multimedia patient education compared with usual care for the prevention of in-hospital falls .  Older hospital patients ( n = 1206 ) admitted to a mixture of acute ( orthopedic , respiratory , and medical ) and subacute ( geriatric and neurorehabilitation ) hospital wards at 2 Australian hospitals were recruited between January 2008 and April 2009 . The interventions were a multimedia patient education program based on the health-belief model combined with trained health professional follow-up ( complete program ) , multi-media patient education material s alone ( material s only ) , and usual care ( control ) .  Falls data were collected by blinded research assistants by review ing hospital incident reports , h and search ing medical records , and conducting weekly patient interviews . RESULTS Rates of falls per 1000 patient-days did not differ significantly between groups ( control , 9.27 ; material s only , 8.61 ; and complete program , 7.63 ) . However , there was a significant interaction between the intervention and presence of cognitive impairment . Falls were less frequent among cognitively intact patients in the complete program group ( 4.01 per 1000 patient-days ) than among cognitively intact patients in the material s-only group ( 8.18 per 1000 patient-days ) ( adjusted hazard ratio , 0.51 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.28 - 0.93 ] ) and control group ( 8.72 per 1000 patient-days ) ( adjusted hazard ratio , 0.43 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.24 - 0.78 ) . CONCLUSION Multimedia patient education with trained health professional follow-up reduced falls among patients with intact cognitive function admitted to a range of hospital wards . Trial Registration anzctr.org.au Identifier : ACTRN12608000015347 Abstract Objective : To determine the effectiveness of multifactorial intervention after a fall in older patients with cognitive impairment and dementia attending the accident and emergency department . Design : R and omised controlled trial . Participants : 274 cognitively impaired older people ( aged 65 or over ) presenting to the accident and emergency department after a fall : 130 were r and omised to assessment and intervention and 144 were r and omised to assessment followed by conventional care ( control group ) .  Setting : Two accident and emergency departments , Newcastle upon Tyne . Main outcome measures : Primary outcome was number of participants who fell in year after intervention . Secondary outcomes were number of falls ( corrected for diary returns ) , time to first fall , injury rates , fall related attendances at accident and emergency department , fall related hospital admissions , and mortality . Results : Intention to treat analysis showed no significant difference between intervention and control groups in proportion of patients who fell during 1 year 's follow up ( 74 % ( 96/130 ) and 80 % ( 115/144 ) , relative risk ratio 0.92 , 95 % confidence interval 0.81 to 1.05 ) . No significant differences were found between groups for secondary outcome measures . Conclusions : Multifactorial intervention was not effective in preventing falls in older people with cognitive impairment and dementia presenting to the accident and emergency department after a fall . What is already known on this topic Multifactorial intervention prevents falls in cognitively normal older people living in the community and in those who present to the accident and emergency department after a fall Fall prevention strategies have not been tested by controlled trials in patients with cognitive impairment and dementia who fall What this study adds No benefit was shown from multifactorial assessment and intervention after a fall in patients with cognitive impairment and dementia presenting to the accident and emergency department The intervention was less effective in these patients than in cognitively normal older Background Interventions for preventing  falls in older people often involve several components , multidisciplinary teams , and implementation in a variety of setting s. We have developed a classification system ( taxonomy ) to describe interventions used to prevent falls in older people , with the aim of improving the design and reporting of clinical trials of fall-prevention interventions , and synthesis of evidence from these trials . Methods Thirty three international experts in falls prevention and health services research participated in a series of meetings to develop consensus . Robust techniques were used including literature review s , expert presentations , and structured consensus workshops moderated by experienced facilitators . The taxonomy was refined using an international test panel of five health care practitioners . We assessed the chance corrected agreement of the final version by comparing taxonomy completion for 10 r and omly selected published papers describing a variety of fall-prevention interventions . Results The taxonomy consists of four domains , summarized as the " Approach " , " Base " , " Components " and " Descriptors " of an intervention . Sub-domains include ; where participants are identified ; the theoretical approach of the intervention ; clinical targeting criteria ; details on assessment s ; descriptions of the nature and intensity of interventions . Chance corrected agreement of the final version of the taxonomy was good to excellent for all items . Further independent evaluation of the taxonomy is required . Conclusions The taxonomy is a useful instrument for characterizing a broad range of interventions used in falls prevention . Investigators are encouraged to use the taxonomy to report their interventions Introduction This study evaluates whether a postoperative multidisciplinary , intervention program , including systematic assessment and treatment of fall risk factors , active prevention , detection , and treatment of postoperative complications , could reduce inpatient falls and fall-related injuries after a femoral neck fracture . Methods A r and omized , controlled trial at the orthopedic and geriatric departments at Umeå University Hospital , Sweden , included 199 patients with femoral neck fracture , aged ≥70 years . Results Twelve patients fell 18 times in the intervention group compared with 26 patients suffering 60 falls in the control group . Only one patient with dementia fell in the intervention group compared with 11 in the control group . The crude postoperative fall incidence rate was 6.29/1,000 days in the intervention group vs 16.28/1,000 days in the control group . The incidence rate ratio was 0.38 [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) : 0.20 – 0.76 , p = 0.006 ] for the total sample and 0.07 ( 95 % CI : 0.01–0.57 , p=0.013 ) among patients with dementia . There were no new fractures in the intervention group but four in the control group . Conclusion A team applying comprehensive geriatric assessment and rehabilitation , including prevention , detection , and treatment of fall risk factors , can successfully prevent inpatient falls and injuries , even in patients with dementia OBJECTIVE to evaluate the impact of a staff-oriented intervention on the number of accidental falls  in residents with and without cognitive impairment . DESIGN clustered r and omised controlled trial . METHO 
    Output:
    
Most of the studies were undertaken in nursing and residential homes , and none in mental health hospital setting s. Conclusions There is a dearth of falls research in mental health setting s or which focus on patients with mental health problems despite the high number of falls experienced by this population group .
This review highlights the lack of robust evidence to support practitioners to implement practice s that prevent people with mental health problems from falling