***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Whether asthma morbidity in minority groups can be reduced by preventative health care measures delivered in the relevant ethnic dialects requires further evaluation . This study reports clinical outcomes and quality of life from a community based project investigating white European ( W/E ) and Indian subcontinent ( ISC ) ethnic groups with asthma living in deprived inner city areas of Birmingham , UK . METHODS Six hundred and eighty nine asthmatic subjects ( 345 W/E , 344 ISC ) of mean ( SD ) age 34.5 ( 15 ) years ( range 11–59 ) and mean forced expiratory volume in one second ( FEV1 ) of 80 % predicted were interviewed in English , Punjabi , Hindi , or Urdu . Subjects r and omised to the active limb of a prospect i ve , open , r and omised , controlled , parallel group , 12 month follow up study underwent individually based asthma education and optimisation of drug therapy with four monthly follow up ( active intervention ) . Control groups were seen only at the beginning and end of the study . Urgent or emergency interactions with primary and secondary health care ( clinical outcomes ) and both cross sectional and longitudinal data from an Asthma Quality of Life Question naire ( AQLQ ) were analysed . RESULTS Clinical outcomes were available for 593 subjects . Fewer of the active intervention group consulted their GP ( 41.8 % versus 57.8 % , odds ratio ( OR ) 0.52 ( 95 % CI 0.37 to 0.74 ) ) or were prescribed antibiotics ( 34.9 % versus 51.2 % , OR 0.51 ( 95 % CI 0.36 to 0.72 ) ) , but by ethnicity statistically significant changes occurred only in the W/E group with fewer also attending A&E departments and requiring urgent home visits . Active intervention reduced the number of hospital admissions ( 10 versus 30 ) , GP consultations ( 341 versus 476 ) , prescriptions of rescue oral steroids ( 92 versus 177 ) , and antibiotics ( 220 versus 340 ) , but again significant improvements by ethnicity only occurred in the active W/E group . AQLQ scores were negatively skewed to the higher values ; regression analysis showed that lower values were associated with ISC ethnicity . Longitudinal changes ( for 522 subjects ) in the mean AQLQ scores were small but statistically significant for both ethnic groups , with scores improving in the active and worsening in the control groups . CONCLUSIONS Active intervention only improved clinical outcomes in the W/E group . AQLQ scores , although lower in the ISC group , were improved by active intervention in both ethnic groups A prospect i ve r and omised trial was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of an asthma education programme administered by an asthma nurse specialist in an out-patient setting . Sixty asthmatic patients ( mean age 28.5 years ) were enrolled , 30 to a  usual care control group and 30 to an  education group . The education group underwent an individual education programme lasting at least one hour . The following variables were measured at baseline , one month after the education programme and at one year follow-up : asthma knowledge by MCQ ( 36 point question naire ) , inhaler technique ( 7 point scale ) , peak expiratory flow rate ( PEFR ) and symptomatology by visual analogue score ( 0 to 10 score ) . The education group 's inhaler technique and MCQ score both improved significantly at one month , from 5.4 ( 0.3 ) ( mean [ SEM ] ) to 6.5 ( 0.3 ) , p < 0.001 , and from 7.5 ( 2.4 ) to 22 ( 1.8 ) , p < 0.0001 respectively . Both of these improvements were significantly greater than in the control group , and both were maintained at one year follow-up . The symptom score improved over one year in the education group , from 5.4 ( 0.6 ) to 7.6 ( 0.5 ) , p < 0.05 , and was unchanged in the control group . There was no change in the PEFR in either group . This study shows clear objective benefits to an out-patient asthma education programme conducted by an asthma nurse specialist The purpose was to compare the short-term cost-effectiveness of intensive vs conventional education and supervision for the self-management of mild asthmatic patients . Consecutive newly diagnosed asthmatic patients ( n = 162 ) were r and omized into an intervention group ( IG ) and a control group ( CG ) with 1 yr of treatment and follow-up . Intensive education was given to 77 patients at visits every third month in the outpatient clinic . Eighty CG patients received conventional education and advice at the baseline visit only . All patients received similar inhaled anti-inflammatory treatment . At baseline and at 12 months st and ard clinical lung functions and health-related quality of life ( HRQOL ) were measured , the latter by the disease-specific St George 's Respiratory Question naire and the generic 15D . Furthermore , the use of extra health care services , medication and sickness days were recorded . The IG experienced a significant improvement in all clinical and HRQOL outcome variables . The same applied to the CG except spirometric values . The groups differed significantly only in terms of FEV1 ( P < 0.05 ) in favour of the IG . There was a significant difference between the groups in extra costs . The mean cost was FIM 2351 per patient ( 294 Pounds sterling ) in the CG and FIM 2757 per patient ( 345 Pounds ) in the IG , of which the intervention cost was FIM 1978 per patient ( 247 Pounds ) . In 1 yr follow-up the intensive education programme did not prove to be cost effective but was dominated by the conventional one regardless of what effectiveness measure was used . Also , a purely monetary cost-benefit calculation showed that the intervention result ed in a negative net benefit ( loss ) of FIM 406 per patient ( 51 Pounds ) . A longer follow-up may be needed before definitive conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of this kind of intervention can be drawn The effects on self management of asthma of a specially prepared book and audiocassette tape with similar contents were observed in a controlled study of 177 patients with asthma in general practice . After a run in period of six months patients were r and omly given the book , the tape , both the book and tape , or neither . Patients ' knowledge of the use of drugs , perceptions of their disability , skill in using an inhaler , consumption of drugs , consultations with their general practitioners , morbidity ( from patients ' entries on diary cards ) , and use of the educational material were measured . Knowledge about the use of drugs was significantly increased in the groups who received the material after three months and persisted after 12 months . Patients who had been given the tape or the book and tape increased their scores of knowledge of drugs more than patients given the book alone . Patients in all groups given the material considered that their disability was reduced . There were no other significant changes . Patients given both the book and the tape preferred the book . Patients with asthma can obtain useful information from such material . The paradoxical result whereby patients learnt more from the tape but preferred the book suggests that a distinction can be made between information that patients need , which may be acquired better from an audiocassette , and information that they want , which may be acquired better from a book BACKGROUND Many patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease use their medication inhalers incorrectly . General practitioners , pharmacists and other health care providers do not always have the opportunity to instruct patients in correct inhaler technique . OBJECTIVE To find out whether the inhaler technique and respiratory symptoms of patients can be improved after instruction by practice assistants . METHODS Single blind , r and omized intervention study in which 48 patients who had been using a dry powder inhaler for at least one month took part . Their inhaler technique was videotaped on two visits with a two-week interval between visits . The inhaler technique on the videos was subsequently scored by two experts on nine criteria . At both visits the patients completed a question naire about their respiratory symptoms . After the first video , 25 patients were r and omly chosen to receive instruction from one of six practice assistants who had followed a one evening course about inhaler instruction , and who had been issued an instruction-set . RESULTS The patients who received instruction had a significantly greater reduction in number of mistakes at the second visit than the patients who did not ( P = 0.01 ) . The instructed patients also reported less dyspnoea at the second visit ( P = 0.03 ) . No effect of instruction was found on wheezing , cough and sputum production . CONCLUSION The inhaler technique of patients can be improved significantly by the instruction of patients by trained practice assistants , possibly result ing in less dyspnoea Abstract Objectives : To evaluate the effectiveness of an asthma re source centre in improving treatment and quality of life for asthmatic patients Design : Community based r and omised controlled trial Setting : 41 general practice s in Greenwich with a practice nurse Subjects : All registered patients aged 15 - 50 years Intervention : Nurse specialists in asthma who educated and supported practice nurses , who in turn educated patients in the management of asthma according to the British Thoracic Society 's guidelines Main outcome measures : Quality of life of  asthmatic patients , attendance at accident and emergency departments , admissions to local hospitals , and steroid prescribing by general practitioners Results : Of 24 400 patients r and omly selected and surveyed in 1993 , 12 238 replied ; 1621 were asthmatic of whom 1291 were sent a repeat question naire in 1996 and 780 replied . Of 24 400 patients newly surveyed in 1996 , 10 783 ( 1616 asthmatic ) replied . No evidence was found for an improvement in asthma related quality of life among newly surveyed patients in intervention practice s compared with control practice s. Neither was there evidence of an improvement in other measures of the quality of asthma care . Weak evidence was found for an improvement in quality of life in intervention practice s among asthmatics registered with study practice s in 1993 and followed up in 1996 . Neither attendances at accident and emergency departments nor admissions for asthma showed any tendency to diverge in intervention and control practice s over the study period . Steroid prescribing rates rose steadily during the study period . The average annual increase in steroid prescribing was 3 % per year higher in intervention than control practice s ( 95 % confidence interval −1 % to 6 % , P=0.10 ) Conclusions : This model of service delivery is not effective in improving the outcome of asthma in the community . Further development is required if cost effective management of asthma is to be BACKGROUND Despite improved underst and ing of the pathophysiology of asthma , morbidity and mortality continue to rise , with disproportionate increases occurring among urban , indigent minorities . New approaches in the management of asthma are therefore necessary to reverse these dramatic and costly trends . OBJECTIVE To determine if patients who are admitted to the hospital with acute asthma and receive inpatient education  will have improved outpatient follow-up and clinical outcome measures compared with those receiving conventional care . METHODS Patients enrolled in the study had a primary admission diagnosis of asthma and were between ages 18 and 45 years . Exclusion criteria included comorbid disease , inability to speak English , absence of a telephone in the primary residence , or pregnancy . Seventy-seven patients admitted from the emergency department with asthma were r and omized to either the inpatient educational program ( IEP ) or routine care ( control group ) . Patients in the IEP received asthma education , bedside spirometry , a telephone call 24 hours after discharge , and scheduled follow-up in an outpatient asthma program within 1 week of discharge . Those individuals r and omized to the routine management group received conventional inpatient asthma care and routine follow-up . RESULTS The patients enrolled in the IEP had a markedly higher follow-up rate compared with outpatient appointments ( 60 % vs. 27 % ; P = .01 ) and significantly fewer emergency department visits ( P = .04 ) and hospitalizations ( P = .04 ) for asthma in the 6 months following IEP intervention , as compared with control patients . This represented a substantial cost savings to the managed care organization . CONCLUSION Our study suggests that an IEP in the treatment of indigent , inner-city patients hospitalized with asthma reduces the need for subsequent emergent care and improves outpatient follow-up in a cost-effective manner A prospect i ve controlled trial of home monitoring of peak expiratory flow rate ( PEFR ) was conducted to determine the usefulness of an objective measure of lung function in association with an education program and a medication self-management plan in reducing morbidity in adult patients with asthma . Thirty-five patients managed themselves , using peak flow readings as the basis for the therapeutic plan coupled with educational intervention , whereas 35 control patients  used symptoms and spirometric data for following physicians ' treatment plans . After a 6-mo study period , patients in the experimental group showed statistically significant improvements in morbidity parameters ( days lost from work , acute asthma attacks , days on antibiotic therapy , physician consultations , and emergency room admissions for asthma ) , increases in FVC , FEV1 , and FEV1/FVC , mean PEFR and mean morning PEFR , decrease in percentage of the mean PEFR amplitude , and a reduction in the use of inhaled beta-agonists , oral theophylline , and oral prednisone .  Although improvements in some of these parameters were also found in the control group , they did not reach the levels of significance obtained in the experimental group . The personal use of an objective measure of lung function in association with a medication self-management plan leads to improvement in the patient 's condition BACKGROUND Although patient education is 
    Output:
    
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS Optimal self-management allowing for optimisation of asthma control by adjustment of medications may be conducted by either self-adjustment with the aid of a written action plan or by regular medical review .
Individualised written action plans based on peak expiratory flow are equivalent to action plans based on symptoms .
Reducing the intensity of self-management education or level of clinical review may reduce its effectiveness