***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Case management is believed to promote continuity of care and decrease hospitalization rates , although few controlled trials have tested this approach . OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of a st and ardized telephonic case-management intervention in decreasing re source use in patients with chronic heart failure . METHODS A r and omized controlled clinical trial was used to assess the effect of telephonic case management on re source use .  Patients were identified at hospitalization and assigned to receive 6 months of intervention ( n = 130 ) or usual care ( n = 228 ) based on the group to which their physician was r and omized .  Hospitalization rates , readmission rates , hospital days , days to first rehospitalization , multiple readmissions , emergency department visits , inpatient costs , outpatient re source use , and patient satisfaction were measured at 3 and 6 months . RESULTS The heart failure hospitalization rate was 45.7 % lower in the intervention group at 3 months ( P = .03 ) and 47.8 % lower at 6 months ( P = .01 ) . Heart failure hospital days ( P = .03 ) and multiple readmissions ( P = .03 ) were significantly lower in the intervention group at 6 months . Inpatient heart failure costs were 45.5 % lower at 6 months ( P = .04 ) . A cost saving was realized even after intervention costs were deducted . There was no evidence of cost shifting to the outpatient setting . Patient satisfaction with care was higher in the intervention group . CONCLUSIONS The reduction in hospitalizations , costs , and other re source use achieved using st and ardized telephonic case management in the early months after a heart failure admission is greater than that usually achieved with pharmaceutical therapy and comparable with other disease management approaches OBJECTIVES to investigate the effectiveness of a  pharmacy discharge plan  in elderly hospitalized patients . DESIGN r and omized controlled trial . SUBJECTS AND SETTING S we r and omized patients aged 75 years and older on four or more medicines who had been discharged from three acute general and one long-stay hospital to a pharmacy intervention or usual care . INTERVENTIONS the hospital pharmacist developed discharge plans which gave details of medication and support required by the patient . A copy was given to the patient and to all relevant professionals and carers . This was followed by a domiciliary assessment by a community pharmacist . In the control group , patients were discharged from hospital following st and ard procedures that included a discharge letter to the general practitioner listing current medications . OUTCOMES the primary outcome was re-admission to hospital within 6 months . Secondary outcomes included the number of deaths , attendance at hospital outpatient clinics and general practice and proportion of days in hospital over the follow-up period , together with patients ' general well-being , satisfaction with the service and knowledge of and adherence to prescribed medication . RESULTS we recruited 362 patients , of whom 181 were r and omized to each group . We collected hospital and general practice data on at least 91 and 72 % of patients respectively at each follow-up point and interviewed between 43 and 90 % of the study subjects . There were no significant differences between the groups in the proportion of patients re-admitted to hospital between baseline and 3 months or 3 and 6 months . There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes . CONCLUSIONS we found no evidence to suggest that the co-ordinated hospital and community pharmacy care discharge plans in elderly patients in this study influence outcomes Abstract Objectives : To determine whether specialist nurse intervention improves outcome in patients with chronic heart failure . Design : R and omised controlled trial . Setting : Acute medical admissions unit in a teaching hospital . Participants : 165 patients admitted with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction . The intervention started before discharge and continued thereafter with home visits for up to 1 year . Main outcome measures : Time to first event analysis of death from all causes or readmission to hospital with worsening heart failure . Results : 31 patients ( 37 % ) in the intervention group died or were readmitted with heart failure compared with 45 ( 53 % ) in the usual care group ( hazard ratio=0.61 , 95 % confidence interval 0.33 to 0.96).Compared with usual care , patients in the intervention group had fewer readmissions for any reason ( 86 v 114 , P=0.018 ) , fewer admissions for heart failure ( 19 v 45 , P<0.001 ) and spent fewer days in hospital for heart failure ( mean 3.43 v 7.46 days , P=0.0051 ) . Conclusions : Specially trained nurses can improve the outcome of patients admitted to hospital with heart failure . What is already known on this topic Studies have suggested that nurse intervention may reduce readmission in patients with heart failure What this study adds Home based intervention from nurses reduces readmissions for worsening heart failure Regular contact to review treatment and patient education are likely to contribute to this To select patients for early discharge planning , a r and omized clinical trial evaluated a protocol that used risk factors identified upon hospital admission . The goal of the study was to determine if intervention with high-risk patients could reduce the need for hospital admission or skilled care .  Of 13,255 patients screened , 835 study participants were identified as " at risk " for frequent health care re source use . Half of the high-risk patients were r and omly assigned to the experimental group ( n=417 ) and received discharge planning from day 3 of their hospital stay , while the control group ( n=418 ) received discharge planning only if there was a written physician request . Those patients receiving early , systematic discharge planning experienced an increased likelihood of successful return to home after hospital admission and a decreased chance of unscheduled readmission for the 9-month study period . Length of the index hospital stay was not affected by early planning , however . The major clinical implication is the potential for discharge planners to decrease the need for , and use of , health care re sources after hospital admission OBJECTIVE To determine whether enhanced access to primary care affects the diagnostic evaluation , pharmacologic management , or health outcomes of patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure ( CHF ) . DESIGN Multisite r and omized , controlled trial . SETTING Nine Veterans Affairs medical centers . PATIENTS 443 patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of CHF . INTERVENTION Enhanced access to primary care , including assignment of a primary care nurse and physician , increased telephone contact , additional outpatient visits , and patient education . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Diagnostic evaluation , pharmacologic management , health-related quality of life , and hospital readmission rates . RESULTS About 80 % of patients who had enhanced access to care and patients receiving usual care underwent recommended evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction . Among the subset of patients for whom an angiotensin-converting enzyme ( ACE ) inhibitor was recommended ( i.e. , ejection fraction < 40 % ) , three quarters of the patients in both the enhanced access and usual care groups received the drug ( 75 % vs. 73 % ; P > 0.2 ) . Enhanced access to primary care did not improve quality of life and increased hospital readmissions , with an average of 1.5 + /- SD 2.0 readmissions per 6 months of follow-up for patients who had enhanced access compared with 1.1 + /- SD 1.8 for those who received usual care ( P = 0.02 ) . CONCLUSIONS Compliance with recommended CHF testing and treatment guidelines was equally high in both study groups . Enhanced access to primary care did not improve patients ' self-reported health status and was associated with more frequent hospitalizations PURPOSE This work addresses the unanswered question of whether multidisciplinary care ( MDC ) of heart failure ( HF ) can reduce readmissions when optimal medical care is applied in both intervention and control groups . METHODS In a r and omized , controlled study , 98 patients ( mean age , 70.8 + /- 10.5 years ) admitted to hospital with left ventricular failure ( New York Heart Association Class IV ) were assigned to routine care ( RC , n = 47 ) or MDC ( n = 51 ) . All patients received the same components of inpatient , optimal medical care of HF : specialist-led inpatient care ; titration to maximum tolerated dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor before discharge ; attainment of predetermined discharge criteria ( weight stable , off all intravenous therapy , and no change in oral regimen for 2 days ) . Only those in the MDC group received inpatient and outpatient education and close telephone and clinic follow-up . The primary study endpoint was rehospitalization or death for a HF-related issue at 3 months . MAIN FINDINGS At 3 months , four people had events in the MDC group ( 7.8 % rate over 3 months ) compared with 12 people ( 25.5 % rate over 3 months ) in the RC group ( P = 0.04 ) . CONCLUSION These data demonstrate for the first time the intrinsic benefit of MDC in the setting of protocol -driven , optimal medical management of HF . Moreover , the event rate of 7.8 % at 3 months , as the lowest reported rate for such a high-risk group , underlines the value of this approach to the management of heart failure PURPOSE Several r and omized trials have found that discharge planning improves outcomes for hospitalized patients . We do not know if adding a clinical nurse specialist ( CNS ) to physician teams in hospitals that already have discharge planning services makes a difference . METHODS In 2 teaching hospitals , patients were r and omly assigned to regular hospital care or care with a clinical nurse specialist . The clinical nurse specialist facilitated hospital care by retrieving preadmission information , arranging in-hospital consultations and investigations , organizing postdischarge follow-up visits , and checking up on patients postdischarge with a telephone call . In-hospital outcomes included mortality and length of stay . Postdischarge outcomes included time to readmission or death , patient satisfaction , and the risk of adverse event . Adverse events were poor outcomes due to medical care rather than the natural history of disease . RESULTS A total of 620 sequential patients were r and omized ( CNS n = 307 , control n = 313 ) , of which 361 were followed after discharge from hospital ( CNS n = 175 , control n = 186 ) . The groups were similar for the probability of in-hospital death ( CNS 9.3 % vs control 9.7 % ) or being discharged to the community ( 58.0 % vs 60.0 % ) . The groups did not differ for postdischarge outcomes including readmission or death ( 21.6 % vs 15.6 % ; P = 0.16 ) or risk of adverse event ( 23.6 % vs 22.8 % ) . Mean [ SD ] patient ratings of overall quality of care on a scale of 10 was higher in the clinical nurse specialist group ( 8.2 [ 2.2 ] vs 7.6 [ 2.4 ] ; P = 0.052 ) . CONCLUSION The addition of a clinical nurse specialist to a medical team improved patient satisfaction but did not impact hospital efficiency or patient safety OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of a hospital-coordinated discharge care plan , involving a multidisciplinary team of primary health care providers , on hospital length of stay , quality of life , and both patient and general practitioner inclusion in , and satisfaction with , discharge procedures . DESIGN This investigation comprised a prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled , clinical trial . SETTING This multicentre and cross-jurisdictional study focused on areas of tertiary and primary health care as well as community allied health in Western Australia . PARTICIPANTS Patients ( n = 189 ) with chronic cardiorespiratory diagnoses were recruited from respiratory , cardiovascular , and general medical wards at two tertiary hospitals . INTERVENTION Subjects were r and omly assigned to one of two groups . Intervention group patients received a discharge care plan in accordance with that outlined in the Australian Enhanced Primary Care Package , completed before discharge and sent to the patient 's general practitioner and other community service providers for review . Control patients were discharged under existing hospital processes . Outcome measures . Patients and general practitioners were surveyed pre-discharge and 7 days post-discharge for quality of life and opinion of discharge procedures . Hospital length of stay was also determined . RESULTS Significant improvements in discharge planning involvement , health service access , confidence with discharge procedures , and opinion of discharge based on previous experience were seen for patients who received the discharge care plan . Further , improved perceptions of mental quality of life were observed within the first week post-discharge for intervention patients . Length of stay showed no difference between groups . Extent and speed of hospital-general practitioner communication were significantly improved via the intervention . CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that a multidisciplinary discharge care plan , initiated before separation , improves quality of life , involvement , and satisfaction with discharge care , and hospital-general practitioner integration . As such , it possesses benefits over current Western Australian hospital discharge procedures for the care of chronically ill population Background . The growing number of patients with congestive heart failure has increased both the pressure on hospital re sources and the need for community management of the condition . Improving hospital-to-home transition for this population is a logical step in responding to current practice guidelines ’ recommendations for coordination and education . Positive outcomes have been reported from trials evaluating multiple interventions , enhanced hospital discharge , and follow-up through the addition of a case management role . The question remains if similar gains could be achieved working with usual hospital and community nurses . Methods . A 12-week , prospect i ve , r and omized controlled trial was conducted of the effect of transitional care on health-related quality of life ( disease-specific and generic measures ) , rates of readmission , and emergency room use .  The nurse-led intervention focused on the transition from hospital-to-home and supportive care for self-management 2 weeks after 
    Output:
    
Compared with usual care , there was moderate quality evidence that individualized discharge planning is more effective at reducing readmissions or hospital LOS but not mortality , and very low quality evidence that it is more effective at improving HRQOL or patient satisfaction .
Compared with usual care , there was low quality evidence that the discharge planning plus postdischarge support is more effective at reducing readmissions but not more effective at reducing hospital LOS or mortality .
There was very low quality evidence that it is more effective at improving HRQOL or patient satisfaction