***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background Preliminary studies suggest that physical exercise interventions can improve physical fitness , fatigue and quality of life in cancer patients after completion of chemotherapy . Additional research is needed to rigorously test the effects of exercise programmes among cancer patients and to determine optimal training intensity accordingly . The present paper presents the design of a r and omized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a high intensity exercise programme compared to a low-to-moderate intensity exercise programme and a waiting list control group on physical fitness and fatigue as primary outcomes . Methods After baseline measurements , cancer patients who completed chemotherapy  are r and omly assigned to either a 12-week high intensity exercise programme or a low-to-moderate intensity exercise programme . Next , patients from both groups are r and omly assigned to immediate training or a waiting list ( i.e. waiting list control group ) . After 12 weeks , patients of the waiting list control group start with the exercise programme they have been allocated to . Both interventions consist of equal bouts of resistance and endurance interval exercises with the same frequency and duration , but differ in training intensity . Additionally , patients of both exercise programmes are counselled to improve compliance and achieve and maintain an active lifestyle , tailored to their individual preferences and capabilities . Measurements will be performed at baseline ( t = 0 ) , 12 weeks after r and omization ( t = 1 ) , and 64 weeks after r and omization ( t = 2 ) . The primary outcome measures are cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength assessed by means of objective performance indicators , and self-reported fatigue . Secondary outcome measures include health-related quality of life , self-reported physical activity , daily functioning , body composition , mood and sleep disturbances , and return to work . In addition , compliance and satisfaction with the interventions will be evaluated . Potential moderation by pre- and post-illness lifestyle , health and exercise-related attitudes , beliefs and motivation will also be assessed . Finally , the cost-effectiveness of both exercise interventions will be evaluated . Discussion This r and omized controlled trial will be a rigorous test of effects of exercise programmes for cancer patients after chemotherapy , aim ing to contribute to evidence -based practice in cancer rehabilitation programmes . Trial registration This study is registered at the Netherl and s Trial Register ( NTR2153 Observational studies demonstrate an association between physical activity and improved outcomes in breast and colon cancer survivors . To test these observations with a large , r and omized clinical trial , an intervention that significantly impacts physical activity in these patients is needed . The Active After Cancer Trial ( AACT ) was a multicenter pilot study evaluating the feasibility of a telephone-based exercise intervention in a cooperative group setting . Sedentary ( engaging in < 60 min of recreational activity/week ) breast and colorectal cancer survivors were r and omized to a telephone-based exercise intervention or usual care control group . The intervention was delivered through the University of California at San Diego ; participants received ten phone calls over the course of the 16-week intervention . All participants underwent assessment of physical activity , fitness , physical functioning , fatigue and exercise self-efficacy at baseline and after the 16-week intervention . One hundred and twenty-one patients were enrolled through ten Cancer and Leukemia Group B ( CALGB ) institutions ; 100 patients had breast cancer and 21 had colorectal cancer . Participants r and omized to the exercise group increased physical activity by more than 100 versus 22 % in controls ( 54.5 vs. 14.6 min , P = 0.13 ) , and experienced significant increases in fitness ( increased 6-min walk test distance by 186.9 vs. 81.9 feet , P = 0.006 ) and physical functioning ( 7.1 vs. 2.6 , P = 0.04 ) as compared to the control group . Breast and colorectal cancer survivors enrolled in a multicenter , telephone-based physical activity intervention  increased physical activity and experienced significant improvements in fitness and physical functioning . Lifestyle intervention research is feasible in a cooperative group setting PURPOSE The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effect of aerobic exercise on physiological and psychological function in patients rehabilitating from cancer treatment . A second purpose was to evaluate the differential effects of low- and moderate-intensity exercise on these variables . METHODS Eighteen survivors of breast or colon cancer ( 15 female and 3 male , 40 - 65 yr of age ) served as subjects . The subjects were matched by aerobic capacity and scores on a Quality of Life question naire , and then r and omly assigned to a control , low- ( 25 - 35 % heart rate reserve ( HRR ) ) , or a moderate- ( 40 - 50 % HRR ) intensity exercise group . The exercise groups performed lower-body aerobic exercise three times a week for 10 wk . After the exercise training , there were no statistically significant differences between the two exercise groups on any of the physiological variables . Therefore , the exercise groups were combined into one group for the final analysis . RESULTS The results revealed statistically significant increases in aerobic capacity ( P < 0.001 ) and lower-body flexibility ( P = 0.027 ) , a significant decrease in body fat ( P < 0.001 ) , and a significant increase in quality of life ( P < 0.001 ) and a measure of energy ( P = 0.038 ) in the exercise group when compared with the control group . CONCLUSION Low- and moderate-intensity aerobic-exercise programs were equally effective in improving physiological and psychological function in this population of cancer survivors .  Aerobic exercise appears to be a valuable and well-tolerated component of the cancer-rehabilitation process PURPOSE The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy ( CBT ) , physical exercise ( PE ) , and of these two interventions combined ( CBT/PE ) on menopausal symptoms ( primary outcome ) , body image , sexual functioning , psychological well-being , and health-related quality of life ( secondary outcomes ) in patients with breast cancer experiencing treatment-induced menopause . PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with breast cancer reporting treatment-induced menopausal symptoms ( N=422 ) were r and omly assigned to CBT ( n=109 ) , PE ( n=104 ) , CBT/PE ( n=106 ) , or to a waiting list control group ( n=103 ) . Self-report question naires were completed at baseline , 12 weeks , and 6 months . Multilevel procedures were used to compare the intervention groups with the control group over time . RESULTS Compared with the control group , the intervention groups had a significant decrease in levels of endocrine symptoms ( Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms ; P<.001 ; effect size , 0.31 - 0.52 ) and urinary symptoms ( Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Question naire ; P=.002 ; effect size , 0.29 - 0.33 ) , and they showed an improvement in physical functioning ( 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical functioning subscale ; P=.002 ; effect size , 0.37 - 0.46 ) . The groups that included CBT also showed a significant decrease in the perceived burden of hot flashes and night sweats ( problem rating scale of the Hot Flush Rating Scale ; P<.001 ; effect size , 0.39 - 0.56 ) and an increase in sexual activity ( Sexual Activity Question naire habit subscale ; P=.027 ; effect size , 0.65 ) . Most of these effects were observed at both the 12-week and 6-month follow-ups . CONCLUSION CBT and PE can have salutary effects on endocrine symptoms and , to a lesser degree , on sexuality and physical functioning of patients with breast cancer experiencing treatment-induced menopause . Future work is needed to improve the design and the planning of these interventions to improve program adherence Few r and omized controlled trials have examined the effects of combined aerobic and resistance training in breast cancer survivors soon after completing adjuvant therapy . Breast cancer survivors ( N = 58 ) within 2 years of completing adjuvant therapy were r and omly assigned to an immediate exercise group ( IEG ; n = 29 ) or a delayed exercise group ( DEG ; n = 29 ) . The IEG completed 12 weeks of supervised aerobic and resistance exercise , three times per week . The DEG completed the program during the next 12 weeks . Participants completed patient-rated outcomes at baseline , 6 , 12 , 18 and 24 weeks . The primary endpoint was overall quality of life ( QoL ) measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast scale . Secondary endpoints were fatigue , social physique anxiety , and physical fitness . Follow-up data was obtained on 97 % of participants and exercise adherence was 61.3 % . Repeated measures analyses of variance revealed a significant group by time interaction for overall QoL ( P < 0.001 ) . Specifically , QoL increased in the IEG from baseline to 12 weeks by 20.8 points compared to a decrease in the DEG of 5.3 points ( mean group difference = 26.1 ; 95 % CI = 18.3–32.7 ; P < 0.001 ) . From 12 to 24 weeks , QoL increased in the DEG by 29.5 points compared to an increase of 6.5 points in the IEG ( mean group difference = 23.0 ; 95 % CI = 16.3–29.1 ; P < 0.001 ) . Similar results were obtained for the secondary endpoints . Combined aerobic and resistance exercise soon after the completion of breast cancer therapy produces large and rapid improvements in health-related outcomes PURPOSE Self-directed and supervised exercise were compared with usual care in a clinical trial design ed to evaluate the effect of structured exercise on physical functioning and other dimensions of health-related quality of life in women with stages I and II breast cancer . PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred twenty-three women with stages I and II breast cancer completed baseline evaluations of generic and disease- and site-specific health-related quality of life , aerobic capacity , and body weight . Participants were r and omly allocated to one of three intervention groups : usual care ( control group ) , self-directed exercise , or supervised exercise .  Quality of life , aerobic capacity , and body weight measures were repeated at 26 weeks . The primary outcome was the change in the Short Form-36 physical functioning scale between baseline and 26 weeks . RESULTS Physical functioning in the control group decreased by 4.1 points , whereas it increased by 5.7 points and 2.2 points in the self-directed and supervised exercise groups , respectively ( P = .04 ) . Post hoc analysis showed a moderately large ( and clinical ly important ) difference between the self-directed and control groups ( 9.8 points ; P = .01 ) and a more modest difference between the supervised and control groups ( 6.3 points ; P = .09 ) . No significant differences between groups were observed for changes in quality of life scores . In a secondary analysis of participants stratified by type of adjuvant therapy , supervised exercise improved aerobic capacity ( + 3.5 mL/kg/min ; P = .01 ) and reduced body weight ( -4.8 kg ; P < .05 ) compared with usual care only in participants not receiving chemotherapy . CONCLUSION Physical exercise can blunt some of the negative side effects of breast cancer treatment , including reduced physical functioning .  Self-directed exercise is an effective way to improve physical functioning compared with usual care . In participants not receiving chemotherapy  , supervised exercise may increase aerobic capacity and reduce body weight compared with usual care Background Over the past years knowledge about benefits of physical activity after cancer is evolving from r and omized exercise intervention trials . However , it has been argued that results may be biased by selective participation . Therefore , we investigated factors influencing participation in a r and omized exercise intervention trial for breast cancer patients . Methods Non-metastatic breast cancer patients were systematic ally screened for a r and omized exercise intervention trial on cancer-related fatigue . Participants and non participants were compared concerning sociodemographic characteristics ( age , marital status , living status , travel time to the training facility ) , clinical data ( body-mass-index , tumor stage , tumor size and lymph node status , comorbidities , chemotherapy ) , fatigue , and physical activity . Reasons for participation or declination were recorded . Results 117 patients ( 52 participants , 65 non participants ) were evaluable for analysis . Multiple regression analyses revealed significantly higher odds to decline participation among patients with longer travel time ( p = 0.0012 ) , living alone ( p = 0.039 ) , with more comorbidities ( 0.031 ) , previous chemotherapy ( p = 0.0066 ) , of age ≥ 70 years ( p = 0.025 ) , or being free of fatigue ( p = 0.0007 ) . No associations were found with BMI or physical activity . By far the most frequently reported reason for declination of participation was too long commuting time to the training facility . Conclusions Willingness of breast cancer patients to participate in a r and omized exercise intervention study differed by sociodemographic factors and health status . Neither current physical activity level nor BMI appeared to be selective for participation . Reduction of personal inconveniences and time effort , e.g. by de central ized training facilities or flexible training schedules , seem most promising for enhancing participation in exercise intervention trials . Trial registration Registered at Clinical Trials.gov : NCT01468766 ( October 2011 ) BACKGROUND Lymphoma patients undergoing therapy must cope with the side-effects of the disease itself , therapy and associated immobility . Peripheral neuropathy ( PNP ) , loss of balance control and weakness not only diminishes patients ' quality of life ( QOL ) , it can also affect planning and 
    Output:
    
No statistically significant differences in intervention effects were found for variations in intervention timing , duration or exercise FITT factors .
Conclusions Exercise interventions , especially when supervised , have statistically significant and small clinical benefit on self-reported QoL and PF in patients with cancer .
Unsupervised exercise intervention effects on PF were larger when prescribed at a higher weekly energy expenditure