***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Anemia in patients with solid tumors is a common problem that is associated with impaired exercise capacity , increased fatigue , and lower quality of life ( QoL ) . Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents ( ESAs ) have been shown to improve these outcomes ; however , it is unknown if additional benefits can be achieved with aerobic exercise training . METHODS We conducted a single-center , prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled trial in 55 mild-to-moderately anemic patients with solid tumors . Patients were r and omized to either darbepoetin alfa alone ( DAL , n = 29 ) or darbepoetin alfa plus aerobic exercise training ( DEX ; n = 26 ) . The DEX group performed aerobic exercise training three times per week at 60%-100 % of baseline exercise capacity for 12 weeks . The primary endpoint was QoL assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia scale . Secondary endpoints were fatigue , cardiorespiratory fitness ( VO(2peak ) ) , hemoglobin ( Hb ) response , and darbepoetin alfa dosing . RESULTS Intention-to-treat analyses indicated significant improvements in QoL and fatigue in both groups over time but there were no between-group differences . The DEX group had a significantly greater VO(2peak ) than the DAL group ( mean group difference , + 3.0 ml/kg per minute ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.2 - 4.7 ; p = .001 ) and there were borderline significant differences in favor of the DEX group for Hb response and darbepoetin alfa dosing . CONCLUSIONS Aerobic exercise training did not improve QoL or fatigue beyond the established benefits of DAL but it did result in favorable improvements in exercise capacity and a more rapid Hb response with lower dosing requirements . Our results may be useful to clinicians despite the more recent restrictions on the indications for ESAs Few r and omized controlled trials have examined the effects of combined aerobic and resistance training in breast cancer survivors soon after completing adjuvant therapy . Breast cancer survivors ( N = 58 ) within 2 years of completing adjuvant therapy were r and omly assigned to an immediate exercise group ( IEG ; n = 29 ) or a delayed exercise group ( DEG ; n = 29 ) . The IEG completed 12 weeks of supervised aerobic and resistance exercise , three times per week . The DEG completed the program during the next 12 weeks . Participants completed patient-rated outcomes at baseline , 6 , 12 , 18 and 24 weeks . The primary endpoint was overall quality of life ( QoL ) measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast scale . Secondary endpoints were fatigue , social physique anxiety , and physical fitness . Follow-up data was obtained on 97 % of participants and exercise adherence was 61.3 % . Repeated measures analyses of variance revealed a significant group by time interaction for overall QoL ( P < 0.001 ) . Specifically , QoL increased in the IEG from baseline to 12 weeks by 20.8 points compared to a decrease in the DEG of 5.3 points ( mean group difference = 26.1 ; 95 % CI = 18.3–32.7 ; P < 0.001 ) . From 12 to 24 weeks , QoL increased in the DEG by 29.5 points compared to an increase of 6.5 points in the IEG ( mean group difference = 23.0 ; 95 % CI = 16.3–29.1 ; P < 0.001 ) . Similar results were obtained for the secondary endpoints . Combined aerobic and resistance exercise soon after the completion of breast cancer therapy produces large and rapid improvements in health-related outcomes PURPOSE Self-directed and supervised exercise were compared with usual care in a clinical trial design ed to evaluate the effect of structured exercise on physical functioning and other dimensions of health-related quality of life in women with stages I and II breast cancer . PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred twenty-three women with stages I and II breast cancer completed baseline evaluations of generic and disease- and site-specific health-related quality of life , aerobic capacity , and body weight . Participants were r and omly allocated to one of three intervention groups : usual care ( control group ) , self-directed exercise , or supervised exercise .  Quality of life , aerobic capacity , and body weight measures were repeated at 26 weeks . The primary outcome was the change in the Short Form-36 physical functioning scale between baseline and 26 weeks . RESULTS Physical functioning in the control group decreased by 4.1 points , whereas it increased by 5.7 points and 2.2 points in the self-directed and supervised exercise groups , respectively ( P = .04 ) . Post hoc analysis showed a moderately large ( and clinical ly important ) difference between the self-directed and control groups ( 9.8 points ; P = .01 ) and a more modest difference between the supervised and control groups ( 6.3 points ; P = .09 ) . No significant differences between groups were observed for changes in quality of life scores . In a secondary analysis of participants stratified by type of adjuvant therapy , supervised exercise improved aerobic capacity ( + 3.5 mL/kg/min ; P = .01 ) and reduced body weight ( -4.8 kg ; P < .05 ) compared with usual care only in participants not receiving chemotherapy . CONCLUSION Physical exercise can blunt some of the negative side effects of breast cancer treatment , including reduced physical functioning .  Self-directed exercise is an effective way to improve physical functioning compared with usual care . In participants not receiving chemotherapy  , supervised exercise may increase aerobic capacity and reduce body weight compared with usual care SUMMARY We consider the analysis of clinical trials that involve r and omization to an active treatment  ( T = 1 ) or a control treatment ( T = 0 ) , when the active treatment is subject to all-or-nothing compliance . We compare three approaches to estimating treatment efficacy in this situation : as-treated analysis , per- protocol analysis , and instrumental variable ( IV ) estimation , where the treatment effect is estimated using the r and omization indicator as an IV . Both model- and method -of-moment based IV estimators are considered . The assumptions underlying these estimators are assessed , st and ard errors and mean squared errors of the estimates are compared , and design implication s of the three methods are examined . Extensions of the methods to include observed covariates are then discussed , emphasizing the role of compliance propensity methods and the contrasting role of covariates in these extensions . Methods are illustrated on data from the Women Take Pride study , an assessment of behavioral treatments for women with heart disease Background : Few studies have evaluated an individualized home-based exercise prescription during and after cancer treatment . Objective : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based exercise training intervention , the Pro-self Fatigue Control Program on the management of cancer-related fatigue . Interventions / Methods : Participants ( N = 119 ) were r and omized into 1 of 3 groups : group 1 received the exercise prescription throughout the study ; group 2 received their exercise prescription after completing cancer treatment ; and group 3 received usual care . Patients completed the Piper Fatigue Scale , General Sleep Disturbance Scale , Center for Epidemiological Studies -Depression Scale , and Worst Pain Intensity Scale . Results : All groups reported mild fatigue levels , sleep disturbance , and mild pain , but not depression . Using multilevel regression analysis , significant linear and quadratic trends were found for change in fatigue and pain ( ie , scores increased , then decreased over time ) . No group differences were found in the changing scores over time . A significant quadratic effect for the trajectory of sleep disturbance was found , but no group differences were detected over time . No significant time or group effects were found for depression . Conclusions : Our home-based exercise intervention had no effect on fatigue or related symptoms associated with cancer treatment . The optimal timing of exercise remains to be determined . Implication s for Practice : Clinicians need to be aware that some physical activity is better than none , and there is no harm in exercise as tolerated during cancer treatment . Further analysis is needed to examine the adherence to exercise . More frequent assessment s of fatigue , sleep disturbance , depression , and pain may capture the effect of exercise OBJECTIVE Assessing effects of  lifestyle interventions  in cancer patients has some specific challenges . Although r and omization is urgently needed for evidence -based knowledge , sometimes it is difficult to apply conventional r and omization ( i.e. , consent preceding r and omization and intervention ) in daily setting s. R and omization before seeking consent was proposed by Zelen , and additional modifications were proposed since . We discuss four alternatives for conventional r and omization : single and double r and omized consent design , two-stage r and omized consent design , and the design with consent to postponed information . STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We considered these design s when design ing a study to assess the impact of physical activity on  cancer-related fatigue and quality of life . We tested the modified Zelen design with consent to postponed information in a pilot . The design was chosen to prevent drop out of participants in the control group because of disappointment about the allocation . RESULTS The result was a low overall participation rate most likely because of perceived lack of information by eligible patients and a relatively high dropout in the intervention group . CONCLUSION We conclude that the alternatives were not better than conventional r and omization Purpose 1 ) To determine the effect of a home-based walking exercise program on the sleep quality and quality of life of cancer patients , as well as 2 ) to determine if enhanced sleep quality was associated with improvement in quality of life over time . Methods This is a prospect i ve , longitudinal , two-armed , r and omized clinical trial . Participants were recruited from oncology outpatient clinics in two university-based medical centers and were allocated to either usual care ( n = 35 ) or a home-based walking exercise intervention for 8 weeks ( n = 36 ) . Measurements included the Taiwanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index , the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 , the Taiwanese Version Ratings of the Perceived Exertion Scale , and a walking exercise log . This study was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis . Effects of the walking exercise program  on sleep quality and quality of life were analyzed by the generalized estimating equation method . Results Patients in the exercise group reported significant improvements in sleep quality ( β = −3.54 , p < 0.01 ) and the mental health dimension of quality of life ( β = 10.48 , p < 0.01 ) . Among patients who exercised , enhanced sleep quality also corresponded with reduced bodily pain ( β = 0.98 , p = 0.04 ) and improvements over time in the mental health dimension of quality of life ( β = −3.87 , p < 0.01 ) . Conclusions A home-based walking exercise program can be easily incorporated into care for cancer patients who are suffering from sleep disturbances Purpose This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an 8-week supervised exercise program in de-conditioned cancer survivors within 2–6 months of chemotherapy completion . Methods Participants were r and omly assigned to an 8-week , twice-weekly , supervised aerobic exercise training regime ( n = 23 ) or a usual care group ( n = 20 ) .  Feasibility was assessed by recruitment rate , program adherence and participant feedback . The primary outcome was aerobic fitness assessed by the Modified Bruce fitness test at baseline ( 0 weeks ) , post-intervention ( 8 weeks ) and at 3-month follow-up . Secondary outcomes included physical activity , waist circumference , fatigue and quality of life . Results The recruitment rate was 81 % and adherence to the supervised exercise was 78.3 % . Meaningful differences in aerobic fitness between the exercise and usual care groups at both the 8-week [ mean 3.0 mL kg−1 min−1 ( 95 % CI −1.1–7.0 ) ] and 3-month follow-up [ 2.1 mL kg−1 min−1 ( −2.3–6.6 ) ] were found , although these differences did not achieve statistical significance ( p values > 0.14 ) . Self-reported physical activity increased in the exercise group ( EG ) compared to the usual care group at both 8-week ( p = 0.01 ) and 3-month follow-up ( p = 0.03 ) and significant differences in favour of the EG were found for physical well-being at both the 8-week ( p = 0.03 ) and 3-month follow-up ( p = 0.04 ) . Improvements in fatigue ( p = 0.01 ) , total quality of life plus fatigue ( p = 0.04 ) , and a composite physical functioning score ( p = 0.01 ) at the 3-month follow-up were also found . Conclusion The PEACH trial suggests that 8 weeks of supervised aerobic exercise training was feasible and may improve aerobic fitness , fatigue and quality of life in de-conditioned cancer survivors during the early survivorship phase . Implication s for Cancer SurvivorsExercise interventions commenced in the early survivorship phase appear safe , feasible and may lead to improvements in QOL and fatigue Advice to rest and take things easy if patients become fatigued during radiotherapy may be detrimental . Aerobic walking improves physical functioning and has been an intervention for chemotherapy‐related fatigue . A prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled trial was performed to determine whether aerobic exercise would reduce the incidence of fatigue and prevent deterioration in physical functioning during radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma Exercise for Health was a r and omized , controlled trial design ed to evaluate two modes of delivering ( face-to-face [ FtF ] and over-the-telephone [ Tel ] ) an 8-month translational exercise intervention , commencing 6-weeks post-breast cancer surgery ( PS ) . Outcomes included quality of life ( QoL ) , function ( fitness and upper body ) and treatment-related side effects ( fatigue , lymph 
    Output:
    
Control groups receiving an intervention during and after the study intervention period have lower contamination and drop-out rates .