***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background Throughout the literature , drug-related problems ( DRPs ) , such as medication reconciliation issues and potentially inappropriate prescribing , have been reported to be associated with adverse outcomes in older individuals . Both structured pharmacist review of medication ( SPRM ) interventions and computerized decision support systems ( CDSSs ) have been shown to reduce DRPs . Objective The objectives of this study were to ( i ) evaluate the impact of a specially developed SPRM/CDSS intervention on the appropriateness of prescribing in older Irish hospital in patients , and ( ii ) examine the acceptance rates of these recommendations . Methods We prospect ively review ed 361 patients , aged ≥65 years who were admitted to an Irish university teaching hospital over a 12-month period . At the point of admission , the patients received a SPRM/CDSS intervention , which screened for DRPs . Any DRPs that were identified were then communicated in writing to the attending medical team . The patient ’s medical records were review ed again at 7–10 days , or at the point of discharge ( whichever came first ) . Results Of the 361 patients review ed , 181 ( 50.1 % ) were female ; the median age was 77 years [ interquartile range ( IQR ) 71–83 years ) . A total of 3,163 ( median 9 , IQR 6–12 ) and 4,192 ( median 12 , IQR 8–15 ) medications were prescribed at admission and discharge , respectively . The SPRM generated 1,000 recommendations in 296 patients . Of the 1,000 recommendations , 548 ( 54.8 % ) were implemented by the medical teams accordingly . The SPRM/CDSS intervention result ed in an improvement in the appropriateness of prescribing as defined by the medication appropriateness index ( MAI ) , with a statistically significant difference in the median summated MAI at admission ( 15 , IQR : 7–21 ) and follow-up ( 12 , IQR : 6–18 ) ; p < 0.001 . However , the SPRM did not result in an improvement in appropriateness of underprescribing as defined by a modified set assessment of care of vulnerable elders ( ACOVE ) criteria . Conclusion This study indicated that DRPs are prevalent in older Irish hospitalized in patients and that a specially developed SPRM intervention supported by a CDSS can improve both the appropriateness and accuracy of medication regimens of older hospitalized in patients BACKGROUND Falls are the leading cause of both fatal and nonfatal injuries among older adults in the United States . Medications that affect the central nervous system are known to increase the risk of falling . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a community pharmacy-based falls-prevention program targeting high-risk older adults on the rates of recurrent falls , injurious falls , and filling prescriptions for medications that have been associated with an increased risk of falling . METHODS This was a r and omized controlled trial of participants recruited through a community pharmacy chain in North Carolina . The 2-year study consisted of a 1-year " look-back " period before r and omization and a 1-year follow-up period after r and omization . Patients were eligible to participate if they were ≥65 years of age , had fallen at least once during the 1-year period preceding enrollment , and were taking medications associated with an increased risk of falling . Medications classified as high risk included benzodiazepines , antidepressants , anticonvulsants , sedative hypnotics , opioid analgesics , antipsychotics , and skeletal muscle relaxants . Participants were assigned to either the intervention arm or the control arm ; participants in the intervention arm were invited to attend a face-to-face medication consultation conducted by a community pharmacy resident , whereas those in the control arm received no medication consultation . The primary end point was the rate of recurrent falls during the 1-year followup period . Secondary end points were the total number of prescriptions for high-risk medications filled during the follow-up period and either discontinued use or a reduction in the dosage of a high-risk medication during the follow-up period . RESULTS One hundred eighty-six patients ( 132 women , 54 men ; 88.7 % white ) were enrolled . Intention-to-treat ( ITT ) analyses revealed no significant differences in the rates of recurrent falls , injurious falls , or filling prescriptions for high-risk medications . However , 13 patients in the intervention group either discontinued use of a high-risk medication or had the dosage reduced during the follow-up period , compared with 5 patients in the control group ( χ(2 ) = 3.94 ; P < 0.05 ) . As-treated analyses revealed numeric reductions in the rates of falls ( rate ratio [ RR ] = 0.76 ; 95 % CI , 0.53 - 1.09 ) , injurious falls ( RR= 0.67 ; 95 % CI , 0.43 - 1.05 ) , and filling prescriptions for high-risk medications ( RR= 0.85 ; 95 % CI , 0.72 - 1.03 ) after receipt of the intervention , but the differences were not statistically significant . CONCLUSIONS Results of this study support the feasibility of using community pharmacies to deliver a falls-prevention program targeting high-risk older adults . Although the ITT analyses revealed no significant reduction in the rate of recurrent falls , injurious falls , or overall use of high-risk medications , individuals in the intervention group were more likely than those in the control group to discontinue use of a high-risk medication or have the dosage reduced during the 1-year follow-up period . More work is needed to evaluate the intervention using a larger sample size that provides greater power to detect clinical ly meaningful effects of reduction in the use of high-risk medications on preventing or reducing falls in the high-risk population OBJECTIVES to investigate the effectiveness of a  pharmacy discharge plan  in elderly hospitalized patients . DESIGN r and omized controlled trial . SUBJECTS AND SETTING S we r and omized patients aged 75 years and older on four or more medicines who had been discharged from three acute general and one long-stay hospital to a pharmacy intervention or usual care . INTERVENTIONS the hospital pharmacist developed discharge plans which gave details of medication and support required by the patient . A copy was given to the patient and to all relevant professionals and carers . This was followed by a domiciliary assessment by a community pharmacist . In the control group , patients were discharged from hospital following st and ard procedures that included a discharge letter to the general practitioner listing current medications . OUTCOMES the primary outcome was re-admission to hospital within 6 months . Secondary outcomes included the number of deaths , attendance at hospital outpatient clinics and general practice and proportion of days in hospital over the follow-up period , together with patients ' general well-being , satisfaction with the service and knowledge of and adherence to prescribed medication . RESULTS we recruited 362 patients , of whom 181 were r and omized to each group . We collected hospital and general practice data on at least 91 and 72 % of patients respectively at each follow-up point and interviewed between 43 and 90 % of the study subjects . There were no significant differences between the groups in the proportion of patients re-admitted to hospital between baseline and 3 months or 3 and 6 months . There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes . CONCLUSIONS we found no evidence to suggest that the co-ordinated hospital and community pharmacy care discharge plans in elderly patients in this study influence outcomes OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of pharmaceutical care provided in addition to acute Geriatric Evaluation and Management ( GEM ) care on the appropriateness of prescribing . DESIGN R and omized , controlled trial , with the patient as unit of r and omization . SETTING Acute GEM unit . PARTICIPANTS Two hundred three patients aged 70 and older . INTERVENTION Pharmaceutical care provided from admission to discharge by a specialist clinical pharmacist who had direct contacts with the GEM team and patients . MEASUREMENTS Appropriateness of prescribing on admission , at discharge , and 3 months after discharge , using the Medication Appropriateness Index ( MAI ) , Beers criteria , and Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders ( ACOVE ) underuse criteria and mortality , readmission , and emergency visits up to 12 months after discharge . RESULTS Intervention patients were significantly more likely than control patients to have an improvement in the MAI and in the ACOVE underuse criteria from admission to discharge ( odds ratio (OR)=9.1 , 95 % confidence interval (CI)=4.2 - 21.6 and OR=6.1 , 95 % CI=2.2 - 17.0 , respectively ) . The control and intervention groups had comparable improvements in the Beers criteria . CONCLUSION Pharmaceutical care provided in the context of acute GEM care improved the appropriate use of medicines during the hospital stay and after discharge . This is an important finding , because only limited data exist on the effect of various strategies to improve medication use in elderly in patients . The present approach has the potential to minimize risk and improve patient outcomes Objective To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias — the selection for publication of a subset of the original recorded outcome variables on the basis of the results — and its impact on Cochrane review s. Design A nine point classification system for missing outcome data in r and omised trials was developed and applied to the trials assessed in a large , unselected cohort of Cochrane systematic review s. Research ers who conducted the trials were contacted and the reason sought for the non-reporting of data . A sensitivity analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of outcome reporting bias on review s that included a single meta- analysis of the review primary outcome . Results More than half ( 157/283 ( 55 % ) ) the review s did not include full data for the review primary outcome of interest from all eligible trials . The median amount of review outcome data missing for any reason was 10 % , whereas 50 % or more of the potential data were missing in 70 ( 25 % ) review s. It was clear from the publications for 155 ( 6 % ) of the 2486 assessable trials that the research ers had measured and analysed the review primary outcome but did not report or only partially reported the results . For reports that did not mention the review primary outcome , our classification regarding the presence of outcome reporting bias was shown to have a sensitivity of 88 % ( 95 % CI 65 % to 100 % ) and specificity of 80 % ( 95 % CI 69 % to 90 % ) on the basis of responses from 62 trialists . A third of Cochrane review s ( 96/283 ( 34 % ) ) contained at least one trial with high suspicion of outcome reporting bias for the review primary outcome . In a sensitivity analysis undertaken for 81 review s with a single meta- analysis of the primary outcome of interest , the treatment effect estimate was reduced by 20 % or more in 19 ( 23 % ) . Of the 42 meta-analyses with a statistically significant result only , eight ( 19 % ) became non-significant after adjustment for outcome reporting bias and 11 ( 26 % ) would have overestimated the treatment effect by 20 % or more . Conclusions Outcome reporting bias is an under-recognised problem that affects the conclusions in a substantial proportion of Cochrane review s. Individuals conducting systematic review s need to address explicitly the issue of missing outcome data for their review to be considered a reliable source of evidence . Extra care is required during data extraction , review ers should identify when a trial reports that an outcome was measured but no results were reported or events observed , and contact with trialists should be encouraged Aim : To measure the outcomes of a harmonised , structured pharmaceutical care programme provided to elderly patients by community pharmacists . Method : A r and omised , controlled , longitudinal , clinical trial with repeated measures was performed over an 18‐month period , involving  community pharmacies ( 5 intervention and 5 control ) in Northern Irel and . Elderly , ambulatory patients ( ≥ 65 years ) , taking 4 or more prescribed medications were eligible for participation . Patients attending an intervention pharmacy received education on medical conditions , implementation of compliance strategies , rationalising of drug regimens and appropriate monitoring ; patients attending control sites received normal services . A battery of clinical , humanistic and economic outcomes were assessed . Results : A significantly higher proportion of intervention patients were compliant at the end of the 18‐month study and experienced fewer problems with medication compared to control patients ( P < 0.05 ) . There was little impact on quality of life and health care utilisation . Conclusions : Pharmaceutical care provision to community‐dwelling patients result ed in an improvement in medication compliance and evidence of cost‐savings . Future pharmaceutical care studies may benefit from a more focussed selective approach to data collection and outcomes measurement OBJECTIVES to evaluate specialist geriatric input and medication review in patients in high-dependency continuing care . DESIGN prospect i ve , r and omised , controlled trial . SETTING two residential continuing care hospitals . PARTICIPANTS two hundred and twenty-five permanent patients . INTERVENTION patients were r and omised to either specialist geriatric input or regular input . The specialist group had a medical assessment by a geriatrician and medication review by a multidisciplinary expert panel . Regular input consisted of review as required by a medical officer attached to each ward . Re assessment occurred after 6 months . RESULTS one hundred and ten patients were r and omised to specialist input and 115 to regular input . These were comparable for age , gender , dependency levels and cognition . After 6 months , the total number of medications per patient per day fell from 11.64 to 11.09 in the specialist group ( P =  
    Output:
    
Conclusion Outcome reporting from RCTs concerning medication review in older patients is heterogeneous .