***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of canagliflozin , a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor , in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a double-blind , placebo-controlled , parallel-group , multicenter , dose-ranging study in 451 subjects r and omized to canagliflozin 50 , 100 , 200 , or 300 mg once daily ( QD ) or 300 mg twice daily ( BID ) , sitagliptin 100 mg QD , or placebo . Primary end point was change in A1C from baseline through week 12 . Secondary end points included change in fasting plasma glucose ( FPG ) , body weight , and overnight urinary glucose-to-creatinine ratio . Safety and tolerability were also assessed . RESULTS Canagliflozin was associated with significant reductions in A1C from baseline ( 7.6–8.0 % ) to week 12 : −0.79 , −0.76 , −0.70 , −0.92 , and −0.95 % for canagliflozin 50 , 100 , 200 , 300 mg QD and 300 mg BID , respectively , versus −0.22 % for placebo ( all P < 0.001 ) and −0.74 % for sitagliptin . FPG was reduced by −16 to −27 mg/dL , and body weight was reduced by −2.3 to −3.4 % , with significant increases in urinary glucose-to-creatinine ratio . Adverse events were transient , mild to moderate , and balanced across arms except for a non – dose-dependent increase in symptomatic genital infections with canagliflozin ( 3–8 % ) versus placebo and sitagliptin ( 2 % ) . Urinary tract infections were reported without dose dependency in 3–9 % of canagliflozin , 6 % of placebo , and 2 % of sitagliptin  arms . Overall incidence of hypoglycemia was low . CONCLUSIONS Canagliflozin added onto metformin significantly improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes and was associated with low incidence of hypoglycemia and significant weight loss . The safety/tolerability profile of canagliflozin was favorable except for increased frequency of genital infections in females OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combinations of empagliflozin/linagliptin as second-line therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Subjects were r and omized to a combination of empagliflozin 25 mg/linagliptin 5 mg ( n = 137 ) , empagliflozin 10 mg/linagliptin 5 mg ( n = 136 ) , empagliflozin 25 mg ( n = 141 ) , empagliflozin 10 mg ( n = 140 ) , or linagliptin 5 mg ( n = 132 ) as add-on to metformin for 52 weeks . The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 24 . RESULTS At week 24 , reductions in HbA1c ( mean baseline 7.90–8.02 % [ 62.8–64.1 mmol/mol ] ) with empagliflozin/linagliptin were superior to those with empagliflozin or linagliptin alone as add-on to metformin ; adjusted mean ( SE ) changes from baseline were −1.19 % ( 0.06 ) ( −13.1 mmol/mol [ 0.7 ] ) with empagliflozin 25 mg/linagliptin 5 mg , −1.08 % ( 0.06 ) ( −11.8 mmol/mol [ 0.7 ] ) with empagliflozin 10 mg/linagliptin 5 mg , −0.62 % ( 0.06 ) ( −6.8 mmol/mol [ 0.7 ] ) with empagliflozin 25 mg , −0.66 % ( 0.06 ) ( −7.2 mmol/mol [ 0.7 ] ) with empagliflozin 10 mg , and −0.70 % ( 0.06 ) ( −7.6 mmol/mol [ 0.7 ] ) with linagliptin 5 mg ( P < 0.001 for all comparisons ) . In these groups , respectively , 61.8 , 57.8 , 32.6 , 28.0 , and 36.1 % of subjects with baseline HbA1c ≥7 % ( ≥53 mmol/mol ) had HbA1c < 7 % ( < 53 mmol/mol ) at week 24 . Efficacy was maintained at week 52 . The proportion of subjects with adverse events ( AEs ) over 52 weeks was similar across treatment arms ( 68.6–73.0 % ) , with no hypoglycemic AEs requiring assistance . CONCLUSIONS Combinations of empagliflozin/linagliptin as second-line therapy for 52 weeks significantly reduced HbA1c compared with the individual components and were well tolerated ABSTRACT Review of : Neal B , Perkovic V , Mahaffey K , et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes . N Engl J Med . 2017;377:644–657 . The report combines the data from two trials , CANVAS and CANVAS-Renal , which were design ed to evaluate the safety and effect of canagliflozin , an SGLT-2 inhibitor , on the appearance of cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes . Enrollees were patients with type 2 diabetes of at least 30 years of age , with a glycated hemoglobin of > or equal to 7.0 % and < or equal to 10.5 % . Patients either had to have preexisting cardiovascular disease or to be at elevated risk for cardiovascular disease , and to have an estimated glomerular filtration rate ( eGFR ) of > 30 ml/min . Patients were r and omized to canagliflozin at doses of either 100 mg or 300 mg or matching placebo in CANVAS , and to canagliflozin 100 mg with a possible increase to 300 mg , or placebo , in CANVAS-Renal . Physicians were instructed to continue appropriate diabetic management and other therapies in accordance with the best practice s in their community . There was a significant 14 % reduction in the combined endpoint of cardiovascular events of death from cardiovascular causes , nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion , or nonfatal stroke in the canagliflozin treated patients . There was also a pattern of improvement in markers of renal disease , including the change in the level and nature of albuminuria , a 40 % decrease in the glomerular filtration rate , the need for renal replacement therapy , or death from renal causes . This study exp and s the scope of SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy to prevent cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients beyond those with preexisting cardiovascular disease studied in the previous empagliflozin study , raising the question as to whether SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy should be considered appropriate for most , if not all , type 2 diabetes patients , not only to control hyperglycemia but also to reduce cardiovascular and renal events BACKGROUND The cardiovascular safety and efficacy of many current antihyperglycemic agents , including saxagliptin , a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 ( DPP-4 ) inhibitor , are unclear . METHODS We r and omly assigned 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a history of , or were at risk for , cardiovascular events to receive saxagliptin or placebo and followed them for a median of 2.1 years . Physicians were permitted to adjust other medications , including antihyperglycemic agents . The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death , myocardial infa rct ion , or ischemic stroke . RESULTS A primary end-point event occurred in 613 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 609 patients in the placebo group ( 7.3 % and 7.2 % , respectively , according to 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates ; hazard ratio with saxagliptin , 1.00 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.89 to 1.12 ; P=0.99 for superiority ; P<0.001 for noninferiority ) ; the results were similar in the " on-treatment " analysis ( hazard ratio , 1.03 ; 95 % CI , 0.91 to 1.17 ) . The major secondary end point of a composite of cardiovascular death , myocardial infa rct ion , stroke , hospitalization for unstable angina , coronary revascularization , or heart failure occurred in 1059 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 1034 patients in the placebo group ( 12.8 % and 12.4 % , respectively , according to 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates ; hazard ratio , 1.02 ; 95 % CI , 0.94 to 1.11 ; P=0.66 ) . More patients in the saxagliptin group than in the placebo group were hospitalized for heart failure ( 3.5 % vs. 2.8 % ; hazard ratio , 1.27 ; 95 % CI , 1.07 to 1.51 ; P=0.007 ) . Rates of adjudicated cases of acute and chronic pancreatitis were similar in the two groups ( acute pancreatitis , 0.3 % in the saxagliptin group and 0.2 % in the placebo group ; chronic pancreatitis , < 0.1 % and 0.1 % in the two groups , respectively ) . CONCLUSIONS DPP-4 inhibition with saxagliptin did not increase or decrease the rate of ischemic events , though the rate of hospitalization for heart failure was increased . Although saxagliptin improves glycemic control , other approaches are necessary to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes . ( Funded by AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb ; SAVOR-TIMI 53 Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT01107886 . ) We aim ed to compare the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone and pioglitazone as add‐ons to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes . Patients who were inadequately controlled by metformin were r and omized and treated once daily with either lobeglitazone ( 0.5 mg , n = 128 ) or pioglitazone ( 15 mg , n = 125 ) for 24 weeks , with a 28‐week extension trial of lobeglitazone treatment in patients who consented . The primary endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin ( HbA1c ) concentration from baseline to week 24 . At week 24 , the mean change from baseline in HbA1c was −0.74 % for the lobeglitazone group and −0.74 % for the pioglitazone group , with a mean difference of 0.01 % [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) of difference , −0.16 to 0.18 ] . The effects of lobeglitazone  on lipid variables and the adverse events associated with lobeglitazone were similar to those observed with pioglitazone . Lobeglitazone was not inferior to pioglitazone as an add‐on to metformin in terms of their efficacy and safety Aims /hypothesisThe aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin vs placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes who were being treated with background metformin . Methods This r and omised , double-blind , four-arm , parallel-group , Phase 3 study was conducted at 169 centres in 22 countries between April 2010 and August 2012 . Participants ( N = 1,284 ) with type 2 diabetes aged ≥18 and ≤80 years who had inadequate glycaemic control ( HbA1c ≥7.0 % [ 53 mmol/mol ] and ≤10.5 % [ 91 mmol/mol ] ) on metformin therapy received canagliflozin 100 mg or 300 mg , sitagliptin 100 mg , or placebo ( n = 368 , 367 , 366 , 183 , respectively ) for a 26 week , placebo- and active-controlled period followed by a 26 week , active-controlled period ( placebo group switched to sitagliptin [ placebo/sitagliptin ] ) and were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis set . R and omisation was performed using a computer-generated schedule ; participants , study centres and the sponsor were blinded to group assignment . The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26 ; secondary endpoints included changes in HbA1c ( week 52 ) and fasting plasma glucose ( FPG ) , body weight , and systolic 
    Output:
    
All OHAs were effective when added to metformin or metformin and sulfonylurea , although the effects of each agent on body weight and hypoglycemia were different .