***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: A classical treatment for chronic adult periodontitis consists of four to six consecutive sessions of scaling and root planing at a 1- to 2-week interval . Such a so-called " quadrant or sextant therapy " might result in a reinfection of a previously disinfected area by bacteria from an untreated region . The purpose of this study was to investigate , over an 8-month period , the clinical benefits of full-mouth disinfection within a 24-hour period in the control of chronic periodontitis . Ten adult patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were r and omly assigned to a test and a control group . The control group received the st and ard scheme of initial periodontal therapy , consisting of scaling and root planing of the four quadrants was performed within 24 hours and immediately followed by a thorough supra- and subgingival chlorhexidine application to limit any transfer of bacteria . The latter involved tongue brushing with a 1 % chlorhexidine gel for 60 seconds , mouthrinsing with a 0.2 % chlorhexidine solution twice for 60 seconds , repeated subgingival irrigation of all pockets with a 1 % chlorhexidine gel ( 3 times within 10 minutes ) , and mouthrinsing twice daily with a 0.2 % chlorhexidine solution during 2 weeks . In addition , both groups received thorough oral hygiene instructions . The plaque index , gingival index , probing depth , gingival recession , and bleeding on probing were recorded prior to professional cleaning and at 1 , 2 , 4 , and 8 months afterwards . Although the test group scored higher plaque indices than the control group , especially at months 2 and 4 , the gingival index and bleeding tendency showed similar improvements with time . However , when the gingival/plaque ratio was considered , the latter was lower in the test group at all follow-up visits . For pockets > or = 7 mm , full-mouth disinfection showed a significantly ( P = 0.01 ) higher reduction in probing depth at each follow-up visit with , at month 8 , a reduction of 4 mm ( from 8 mm to 4 mm ) , in comparison to 3 mm ( from 8 mm to 5 mm ) for the classical therapy . The increase in gingival recession in the full-mouth disinfection group remained below 0.7 mm , while in the control group it reached 1.9 mm after 8 months . This result ed in a gain of clinical attachment level of 3.7 mm for the test group versus 1.9 mm for the control group . A radiographical examination also indicated a superior improvement for the test group when compared to the control group . This pilot study suggests that a full-mouth disinfection in one day results in an improved clinical outcome in chronic periodontitis as compared to scalings per quadrant at 2-week intervals over several weeks A treatment for periodontal infections often consists of consecutive rootplanings ( per quadrant , at a 1- to 2-week interval ) , without a proper disinfection of the remaining intra-oral niches ( untreated pockets , tongue , saliva , mucosa and tonsils ) . Such an approach , could theoretically lead to a reinfection of previously-treated pockets . The present study aims to examine the effect of a full-mouth disinfection on the microbiota in the above-mentioned niches . Moreover , the clinical benefit of such an approach was investigated . 16 patients with severe periodontitis were r and omly allocated to a test and a control group . The patients from the control group were scaled and rootplaned , per quadrant , at 2-week intervals and obtained oral hygiene instructions . The patients from the test group received a full-mouth disinfection consisting of : scaling and rootplaning of all pockets in 2 visits within 24 h , in combination with tongue brushing with 1 % chlorhexidine gel for 1 min , mouth rinsing with a 0.2 % chlorhexidine solution for 2 min and subgingival irrigation of all pockets ( 3x in 10 min ) with 1 % chlorhexidine gel . Besides oral hygiene , the test group rinsed 2x daily with 0.2 % chlorhexidine and sprayed the tonsils with a 0.2 % chlorhexidine for 2 months . Plaque sample s ( pockets , tongue , mucosa and saliva ) were taken at baseline and after 2 and 4 months , and changes in probing depth , attachment level and bleeding on probing were reported . The full-mouth disinfection result ed in a statistically significant additional reduction/elimination of periodontopathogens , especially in the subgingival pockets , but also in the other niches . These microbiological improvements were reflected in a statistically-significant higher probing depth reduction and attachment gain in the test patients . These findings suggest that a disinfection of all intra-oral niches within a short time span leads to significant clinical and microbiological improvements for up to 4 months OBJECTIVES The beneficial effects of the one-stage , full-mouth disinfection remain controversial in the scientific literature . This might be due to the fact that an entire mouth disinfection with the use of antiseptics has been confused with a full-mouth scaling and root planing . This parallel , single blind RCT study aim ed to compare several full-mouth treatment strategies with each other . MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy-one patients with moderate periodontitis were r and omly allocated to one of the following treatment strategies : scaling and root planing , quadrant by quadrant , at two-week intervals ( negative control , NC ) , full-mouth scaling and root planing within 2 consecutive days ( FRP ) , or three one-stage , full-mouth disinfection ( FM ) protocol s within 2 consecutive days applying antiseptics to all intra-oral niches for periopathogens using as antiseptics : chlorhexidine ( FMCHX ) for 2 months , amine fluoride/stannous fluoride for 2 months ( FMF ) , or chlorhexidine for 2 months followed by amine fluoride/stannous fluoride for another 6 months ( FMCHX+F ) . At baseline and after 2 , 4 , and 8 a series of periodontal parameters were recorded . RESULTS All treatment strategies result ed in significant ( p<0.05 ) improvements of all clinical parameters over the entire duration of the study . Inter-treatment differences were often encountered . The NC group nearly always showed significant smaller improvements than the two CHX groups . The differences between the FRP or FM groups , and the two CHX groups only sporadically reached a statistical significance . CONCLUSION These observations indicate that the benefits of the " OSFMD " protocol are partially due to the use of the antiseptics and partially to the completion of the therapy in a short time Previous studies using correlation or regression analysis have showed that treatment effects measured by the change in clinical parameters are often associated with baseline values of the same parameters . These studies , however , have a method ological weakness . Correlation/regression between baseline measures and the derived change variable invali date s the statistical procedures of testing the null hypothesis : that the coefficient of correlation/regression is zero . This is due to the phenomenon of mathematical coupling . To investigate the impact that this has on the observed correlation/regression coefficient when in reality this is zero , we used  r and om simulations of hypothetical data to model the treatment of periodontal pockets . Results showed a strong probability of obtaining statistically significant correlation/regression coefficients . To separate this artificial effect of mathematical coupling from the true underlying biological relationship , one must apply appropriate analytical strategies to re-evaluate previous evidence within the periodontal literature BACKGROUND / AIMS Recent studies reported significant additional clinical and microbiological improvements when severe adult periodontitis was treated by means of a " one-stage full-mouth " disinfection instead of a st and ard treatment strategy with consecutive root planings quadrant per quadrant . The one stage full-mouth disinfection procedure involves scaling and root planing of all pockets within 24 h in combination with an extensive application of chlorhexidine to all intra-oral niches such as periodontal pockets , tongue dorsum , tonsils ( chairside , and at home for 2 months ) . This study aims to examine the relative importance of the use of chlorhexidine in the one stage full-mouth disinfection protocol . METHODS Therefore , 3 groups of 12 patients each with advanced periodontitis were followed , both from a clinical and microbiological point of view , over a period of 8 months . The patients from the control group were scaled and root planed , quadrant per quadrant . at two-week intervals . The 2 other groups underwent a one stage full-mouth scaling and root planing ( all pockets within 24 h ) with ( Fdis ) or without ( FRp = full-mouth root planing ) the adjunctive use of chlorhexidine . At baseline and after 1 , 2 , 4 and 8 months , the following clinical parameters were recorded : plaque and gingivitis indices , probing depth , bleeding on probing and clinical attachment level . Microbiological sample s were taken from different intra-oral niches ( tongue , mucosa , saliva and pooled sample s from single- and multi-rooted teeth ) . The sample s were cultured on selective and non-selective media in order to evaluate the number of CFU/ml for the key-periodontopathogens . At baseline , an anonymous question naire was given to the patients to record the perception of each treatment ( post operative pain , fever , swelling etc . ) . RESULTS All 3 treatment strategies result ed in significant improvements for all clinical parameters , but the Fdis and FRp patients reacted always significantly more favourably than the control group , with an additional probing depth reduction of + /- 1.5 mm and an additional gain in attachment of + /- 2 mm ( for pockets > or = 7 mm ) . Also from a microbiological point of view both the FRp and Fdis patients showed additional improvements when compared to the control group , as well in the reduction of spirochetes and motile organisms as in the number of CFU/ml of the key-pathogens , especially when the subgingival plaque sample s were considered . The differences between FRp and Fdis patients were negligible . CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the benefits of a " one-stage full-mouth disinfection " in the treatment of patients suffering from severe adult periodontitis probably results from the full-mouth scaling and root planing within 24 h rather than the beneficial effect of chlorhexidine . The raise in body temperature the second day after the full-mouth scaling and root planing seems to indicate a Shwartzman reaction OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine whether same-day full-mouth scaling and root planing ( FM-SRP ) and quadrant scaling and root planing ( Q-SRP ) result ed in variations in the systemic humoral immune response dynamics ( antibody titres and avidity ) during active treatment and 3 and 6 months post-therapy . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Forty patients with chronic periodontitis were recruited into this study . Subjects were r and omised into two groups and received either scaling and root planing quadrant by quadrant at 2-weekly intervals ( Q-SRP group ) or same-day full-mouth scaling and root planing ( FM-SRP group ) . Clinical measurements and serum sample s were obtained at baseline and approximately 6 weeks after the last clinical intervention ( R1 ) and 6 months after the initiation of therapy ( R2 ) . Furthermore , serum sample s were obtained from each patient undergoing therapy ( Q-SRP and FM-SRP ) at 3 bi-weekly instances so as to determine the short-term effects of each session of scaling and root planing on the dynamics of the humoral immune response . Serum antibody titre was assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ( ELISA ) and antibody avidity was measured by thiocyanate dissociation against five putative periodontal pathogens : Porphyromonas gingivalis ; Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans ; Prevotella intermedia ; Treponema denticola and Bacteroides forsythus . RESULTS Both therapies result ed in similar antibody titre reductions against the majority of the organisms tested and although there was a distinct trend for antibody avidity to increase following therapy , this was not found to be statistically significant , reflecting marked inter-individual variation . In addition , no evidence emerged from this study to support increased antibody titres following the active phases of both treatment approaches due to an inoculation effect . Nevertheless , significant short-term increases in antibody avidity to most test bacteria were noted for both treatment strategies . CONCLUSION Both therapies were associated with a reduction in antibody titres and an increase in the binding ability or avidity of antibodies , but there was a marked inter-subject variability and statistical significance was reached for only some of the test bacteria . No significant differences in the humoral antibody dynamics were found between the two treatment approaches BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical mechanical instrumentation at 2 different time intervals on short-term healing and to assess patient reactions following non-surgical periodontal therapy . METHODS The study population consisted of 100 patients with moderate periodontal disease . Patients were equally distributed into 2 groups , treated daily or weekly . The daily group received full-mouth daily scaling and root planing for 4 consecutive days . The weekly group was treated once a week for 4 weeks . All patients were asked for objective ( lymphadenopathy , aphthous stomatitis , and edema ) and subjective ( fatigue , pain , pruritus , burning sensation , and dentinalgia ) reactions . Clinical measurements of plaque index ( PI ) , gingival index ( GI ) , probing depth ( PD ) , bleeding on probing ( BOP ) , and gingival recession ( GR ) were taken at baseline and 3 months after treatment . All of the objective and subjective reactions were recorded after each treatment session . RESULTS The results of our study revealed a significant decrease in PI , GI , BOP , and PD measurements at the end of the third month , but no significant changes in GR . The incidence of subjective and objective reactions was higher in the daily treated group compared to those in the weekly group . Most of these complaints were observed after the third treatment session . CONCLUSIONS Within the limits of this study , no differences were observed between the study groups when the clinical parameters were evaluated . 
    Output:
    
CONCLUSIONS In adults with chronic periodontitis only minor differences in treatment effects were observed between the treatment strategies