***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVES : Several studies have evaluated whether evidence -based medicine ( EBM ) training courses can improve skills such as literature search ing and critical appraisal but to date , few data exist on whether teaching EBM skills and providing evidence -based re sources result in change in behavior or clinical outcomes . This study was conducted to evaluate whether a multifaceted EBM intervention consisting of teaching EBM skills and provision of electronic evidence re sources changed clinical practice . DESIGN : Before/after study . SETTING : The medical inpatient units at a district general hospital . PARTICIPANTS : Thirty-five attending physicians and 12 medicine residents . INTERVENTION : A multicomponent EBM intervention was provided including an EBM training course of seven 1-hour sessions , an EBM syllabus and textbook , and provision of evidence -based re sources on the hospital network . MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS : The primary outcome of the study was the quality of evidence in support of therapies initiated for the primary diagnoses in 483 consecutive patients admitted during the month before and the month after the intervention . Patients admitted after implementation of the EBM intervention were significantly more likely to receive therapies proven to be beneficial in r and omized controlled trials ( 62 % vs 49 % ; P=.016 ) . Of these trial-proven therapies , those offered after the EBM intervention were significantly more likely to be based on high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( 95 % vs 87 % ; P=.023 ) . CONCLUSIONS : A multifaceted intervention design ed to teach and support EBM significantly improved evidence -based practice patterns in a district general hospital Abstract OBJECTIVE : To determine if a simple educational intervention can increase  resident physician literature search activity .  DESIGN : R and omized controlled trial . SETTING : University hospital-based internal medicine training program . PATIENTS / PARTICIPANTS : Forty-eight medical residents rotating on the general internal medicine service . INTERVENTIONS : One-hour didactic session , the use of well-built clinical question cards , and practical sessions in clinical question building . MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS : Objective data from the library information system that included the number of log-ons to MEDLINE , search ing volume , abstract s viewed , full-text articles viewed , and time spent search ing . Median search activity as measured per person per week ( control vs intervention ) : number of log-ons to MEDLINE ( 2.1 vs 4.4 , P<.001 ) ; total number of search sets ( 24.0 vs 74.2 , P<.001 ) ; abstract s viewed ( 5.8 vs 17.7 , P=.001 ) ; articles viewed ( 1.0 vs 2.6 , P=.005 ) ; and hours spent search ing ( 0.8 vs 2.4 , P<.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS : A simple educational intervention can markedly increase resident search ing activity Background Our primary objective in this study was to measure family physicians ' knowledge of the key elements that go into assessing the validity and interpreting the results in three different types of studies : i ) a r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) ; ii ) a study evaluating a diagnostic test ; and iii ) a systematic review ( SR ) . Our secondary objectives were to determine the relationship between the above skills and age , gender , and type of practice . Methods We obtained a r and om sample of 1000 family physicians in Ontario from the College of Family Physicians of Canada data base . These physicians were sent a question naire in the mail with follow-up mailings to non-responders at 3 and 8 weeks . The question naire was design ed to measure knowledge and underst and ing of the basic concepts of critical appraisal skills . Based on the responses to the questions an Evidence Based Medicine ( EBM ) Knowledge Score was determined for each physician . Results A response rate of 30.2 % was achieved . The respondents were younger and more likely to be recent graduates than the population of Ontario Family Physicians as a whole . This was an expected outcome . Just over 50 % of respondents were able to answer questions concerning the critical appraisal of methods and the interpretation of results of research articles satisfactorily . The average score on the 12-point EBM Knowledge Scale was 6.4 . The younger physicians scored higher than the older physicians , and academic physicians scored higher than community-based physicians . Scores of male and female physicians did not differ . Conclusions We have shown that in a population of physicians which is younger than the general population of physicians , about 50 % have reasonable knowledge regarding the critical appraisal of the methods and the interpretation of results of a research article . In general , younger physicians were more knowledgeable than were older physicians . EBM principles were felt to be important to the practice of medicine by 95 % of respondents PURPOSE The study assesses potential for improving residents ' evidence -based medicine search ing skills in MEDLINE through real-time librarian instruction . SUBJECTS Ten residents on a rotation in a neonatal intensive care unit participated . METHODOLOGY Residents were r and omized into an instruction and a non-instruction group .  Residents  generated questions from rounds and search ed MEDLINE for answers . Data were collected through observation , search strategy analysis , and surveys . Librarians observed search es and collected data on questions , search ing skills , search problems , and the test group 's instruction topics . Participants performed st and ardized search es before , after , and six-months after intervention and were scored using a search strategy analysis tool ( 1 representing highest score and 5 representing lowest score ) . Residents completed pre- and post-intervention surveys to measure opinions about MEDLINE and search satisfaction . RESULTS Post-intervention , the test group formulated better questions , used limits more effectively , and reported greater confidence in using MEDLINE . The control group expressed less satisfaction with retrieval and demonstrated more errors when limiting . The test and control groups had the following average search scores respectively : 3.0 and 3.5 ( pre-intervention ) , 3.3 and 3.4 ( post-intervention ) , and 2.0 and 3.8 ( six-month post-intervention ) . CONCLUSION Data suggest that measurable learning outcomes were achieved . Residents receiving instruction improved and retained search ing skills six-months after intervention Background Previous studies have shown that Norwegian public health physicians do not systematic ally and explicitly use scientific evidence in their practice . They work in an environment that does not encourage the integration of this information in decision-making . In this study we investigate whether a theoretically grounded tailored intervention to diffuse evidence -based public health practice increases the physicians ' use of research information . Methods 148 self-selected public health physicians were r and omised to an intervention group ( n = 73 ) and a control group ( n = 75 ) . The intervention group received a multifaceted intervention while the control group received a letter declaring that they had access to library services . Baseline assessment s before the intervention and post-testing immediately at the end of a 1.5-year intervention period were conducted . The intervention was theoretically based and consisted of a workshop in evidence -based public health , a newsletter , access to a specially design ed information service , to relevant data bases , and to an electronic discussion list . The main outcome measure was behaviour as measured by the use of research in different documents . Results The intervention did not demonstrate any evidence of effects on the objective behaviour outcomes . We found , however , a statistical significant difference between the two groups for both knowledge scores : Mean difference of 0.4 ( 95 % CI : 0.2–0.6 ) in the score for knowledge about EBM-re sources and mean difference of 0.2 ( 95 % CI : 0.0–0.3 ) in the score for conceptual knowledge of importance for critical appraisal . There were no statistical significant differences in attitude- , self-efficacy- , decision-to-adopt- or job-satisfaction scales . There were no significant differences in Cochrane library search ing after controlling for baseline values and characteristics . Conclusion Though demonstrating effect on knowledge the study failed to provide support for the hypothesis that a theory-based multifaceted intervention targeted at identified barriers will change professional behaviour BACKGROUND We have little systematic information about the extent to which st and ard processes involved in health care -- a key element of quality --are delivered in the United States . METHODS We telephoned a r and om sample of adults living in 12 metropolitan areas in the United States and asked them about selected health care experiences . We also received written consent to copy their  medical records  for the most recent two-year period and used this information to evaluate performance on 439 indicators of quality of care for 30 acute and chronic conditions as well as preventive care . We then constructed aggregate scores . RESULTS Participants received 54.9 percent ( 95 percent confidence interval , 54.3 to 55.5 ) of recommended care . We found little difference among the proportion of recommended preventive care provided ( 54.9 percent ) , the proportion of recommended acute care provided ( 53.5 percent ) , and the proportion of recommended care provided for chronic conditions ( 56.1 percent ) . Among different medical functions , adherence to the processes involved in care ranged from 52.2 percent for screening to 58.5 percent for follow-up care . Quality varied substantially according to the particular medical condition , ranging from 78.7 percent of recommended care ( 95 percent confidence interval , 73.3 to 84.2 ) for senile cataract to 10.5 percent of recommended care ( 95 percent confidence interval , 6.8 to 14.6 ) for alcohol dependence . CONCLUSIONS The deficits we have identified in adherence to recommended processes for basic care pose serious threats to the health of the American public . Strategies to reduce these deficits in care are warranted OBJECTIVE To determine if a preceptor and individualized feedback improves the performance of physicians in search ing MEDLINE in clinical setting s. DESIGN R and omized controlled trial with 2 to 10 months follow-up . SETTING A 300-bed teaching hospital . PARTICIPANTS All 392 physicians and physicians-in-training from 6 major clinical departments were invited to participate if they made patient-care decisions during the study period ; 79.4 % agreed . INTERVENTIONS All participants were given 2 hours of basic training , then r and omized to a control group ( no further intervention ) or an intervention group in which each person chose a clinical preceptor experienced in MEDLINE search ing and received individualized feedback from a study librarian on each of their 1st 10 search es . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The number and proportion of relevant and irrelevant references retrieved for 1st , 4th , and 8th search es of participants were compared with independent librarian search es on the same topics . RESULTS Intervention group members did not search more often than controls ( 5.9 search es per month versus 4.7 , respectively ; P = 0.26 ) and there were no significant differences in the quality of search es . Rather , search performance for both groups improved , with the average number of relevant references retrieved per search increasing from 4.5 to 7.4 ( P < 0.01 ) . The librarian retrieved more relevant citations than participants for the 1st search ( P = 0.001 ) but not for the 4th ( P = 0.60 ) or 8th ( P = 0.76 ) search es . CONCLUSIONS A program of assigning preceptors and providing feedback on individual search es did not enhance the quantity or quality of search es . Soon after a basic introduction to search ing , however , clinicians in both groups improved their search performance BACKGROUND Little is known about the relative incidence of serious errors of omission versus errors of commission . OBJECTIVE To identify the most common substantive medical errors identified by medical record review . DESIGN Retrospective cohort study . SETTING Twelve Veterans Affairs health care systems in 2 regions . PARTICIPANTS Stratified r and om sample of 621 patients receiving care over a 2-year period . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Classification of reported quality problems . METHODS Trained physicians review ed the full inpatient and outpatient record and described quality problems , which were then classified as errors of omission versus commission . RESULTS Eighty-two percent of patients had at least 1 error reported over a 13-month period . The average number of errors reported per case was 4.7 ( 95 % confidence intervals [ CI ] : 4.4 , 5.0 ) . Overall , 95.7 % ( 95 % CI : 94.9 % , 96.4 % ) of errors were identified as being problems with underuse . Inadequate care for people with chronic illnesses was particularly common . Among errors of omission , obtaining insufficient information from histories and physicals ( 25.3 % ) , inadequacies in diagnostic testing ( 33.9 % ) , and patients not receiving needed medications ( 20.7 % ) were all common . Out of the 2,917 errors identified , only 27 were rated as being highly serious , and 26 ( 96 % ) of these were errors of omission . CONCLUSIONS While preventing iatrogenic injury result ing from medical errors is a critically important part of quality improvement , we found that the overwhelming majority of substantive medical errors identifiable from the medical record were related to people getting too little medical care , especially for those with chronic medical conditions Objective To determine whether  fellowship training in critical care medicine with critical appraisal exercises improves the ability and confidence of fellows to evaluate the medical literature .  Design Prospect i ve , interventional pilot study . Setting Multidisciplinary critical care medicine training program at a large university hospital . InterventionFellows were given three didactic sessions covering study design , analysis , and critical appraisal techniques . During the course of the year , each fellow was required to review one article from the literature and present a critique of this article to the group and faculty ( Journal Club ) . Fellows were guided in the preparation of this presentation by one of the critical care medicine faculty . Finally , a written analysis and critique of the article was performed by each fellow . Measurements and Main Results A test was given to each fellow at the beginning and end of the academic year . This test consisted of two pairs of articles on therapy for acute lung injury . For the pretest , each fellow was assigned , at r and om , one pair of articles . Fellows were given  
    Output:
    
The instruments were most commonly administered to medical students and postgraduate trainees and evaluated EBP skills .
Among EBP skills , acquiring evidence and appraising evidence were most commonly evaluated , but newer instruments evaluated asking answerable questions and applying evidence to individual patients .
Most behavior instruments measured the performance of EBP steps in practice but newer instruments documented the performance of evidence -based clinical maneuvers or patient-level outcomes .
High- quality instruments were identified for evaluating the EBP competence of individual trainees , determining the effectiveness of EBP curricula , and assessing EBP behaviors with objective outcome measures .