***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Study Design . A prospect i ve r and omized controlled trial . Objectives . To examine the effectiveness of combined manipulative treatment , stabilizing exercises , and physician consultation compared with physician consultation alone for chronic low back pain . Summary of Background Data . Strong evidence exists that manual therapy provides more effective short-term pain relief than does placebo treatment in the management of chronic low back pain . The evidence for long-term effect is lacking . Methods . Two hundred four chronic low back pain patients , whose Oswestry disability index was at least 16 % , were r and omly assigned to either a manipulative-treatment group or a consultation group . All were clinical ly examined , informed about their back pain , provided with an educational booklet , and were given specific instructions based on the clinical evaluation . The treatment included four sessions of manipulation and stabilizing exercises aim ing to correct the lumbopelvic rhythm . Question naires inquired about pain intensity , self-rated disability , mental depression , health-related quality of life , health care costs , and production costs . Results . At the baseline , the groups were comparable , except for the percentage of employees ( P = 0.01 ) . At the 5- and 12-month follow-ups , the manipulative-treatment group showed more significant reductions in pain intensity ( P < 0.001 ) and in self-rated disability ( P = 0.002 ) than the consultation group . However , we detected no significant difference between the groups in health-related quality of life or in costs . Conclusions . The manipulative treatment with stabilizing exercises was more effective in reducing pain intensity and disability than the physician consultation alone . The present study showed that short , specific treatment programs with proper patient information may alter the course of chronic low back pain Study Design . Two replicate , 4-week , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled , trials of rofecoxib 25 and 50 mg versus placebo for chronic low back pain . Objectives . To determine the efficacy and safety of two doses of rofecoxib compared to placebo in the treatment of chronic low back pain . Summary of Background Data . Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly prescribed for chronic low back pain , their efficacy is unproven and toxicity can be serious . These studies evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of rofecoxib , a selective COX-2 inhibitor , in the treatment of chronic low back pain . Methods . Patients with chronic low back pain were r and omized 1:1:1 to rofecoxib 25 mg , 50 mg , or placebo once daily . Primary endpoint : Low Back Pain Intensity . Secondary endpoints : Pain Bothersomeness , Global Assessment s of Response to Therapy , Global Assessment of Disease Status , Rol and -Morris Disability Question naire , SF-12 Health Survey , Use of Rescue Acetaminophen , and Discontinuations Due to Lack of Efficacy . Results . Combining both studies , 690 patients were r and omized to placebo ( N = 228 ) ,  rofecoxib 25 mg ( N = 233 ) , or  rofecoxib 50 mg ( N = 229 ) . Mean ( ± SD ) age was 53.4 ( ± 12.9 ) years , pain duration 12.1 ( ± 11.8 ) years , 62.3 % female .  Both rofecoxib groups improved significantly . Mean differences from placebo in pain intensity were −13.50 mm , −13.81 mm ( 25 , 50 mg doses ) respectively ( P < 0.001 ) . Both regimens were superior to placebo in eight of nine secondary endpoints . Fifty mg provided no advantage over 25 mg . Both rofecoxib regimens were well tolerated , although 25 mg had a slightly better safety profile . Conclusions . Rofecoxib significantly  reduced chronic low back pain in adults and was well tolerated & NA ; The effects of outpatient group cognitive therapy , relaxation training , and cognitive therapy in combination with relaxation training on  chronic low back pain  and associated physical and psychosocial disability were evaluated and compared . One‐hundred and two mildly disabled chronic low back pain patients were assigned r and omly to a waiting‐list ( WL ) control condition and the 3 treatments .  Patient self‐report and observational measures were obtained pretreatment and post‐treatment for all conditions , and at 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐ups for the treatment conditions . Pain intensity decreased significantly pre‐ to post‐treatment for patients in all 3 treatment conditions , but not the WL condition . Depressive symptoms and disability improved significantly in all conditions ( including the waiting list ) from pretreatment to post‐treatment , with no statistically significant differences among treatments . At both follow‐ups , all 3 treatment groups remained significantly improved from pretreatment , with no statistically significant differences between treatments BACKGROUND The effectiveness of massage therapy for low-back pain has not been documented . This r and omized controlled trial compared comprehensive massage therapy ( soft-tissue manipulation , remedial exercise and posture education ) , 2 components of massage therapy and placebo in the treatment of subacute ( between 1 week and 8 months ) low-back pain . METHODS Subjects with subacute low-back pain were r and omly assigned to 1 of 4 groups : comprehensive massage therapy ( n = 25 ) , soft-tissue manipulation only ( n = 25 ) , remedial exercise with posture education only ( n = 22 ) or a placebo of sham laser therapy ( n = 26 ) . Each subject received 6 treatments within approximately 1 month . Outcome measures obtained at baseline , after treatment and at 1-month follow-up consisted of the Rol and Disability Question naire ( RDQ ) , the McGill Pain Question naire ( PPI and PRI ) , the State Anxiety Index and the Modified Schober test ( lumbar range of motion ) . RESULTS Of the 107 subjects who passed screening , 98 ( 92 % ) completed post-treatment tests and 91 ( 85 % ) completed follow-up tests . Statistically significant differences were noted after treatment and at follow-up . The comprehensive massage therapy group had improved function ( mean RDQ score 1.54 v. 2.86 - 6.5 , p < 0.001 ) , less intense pain ( mean PPI score 0.42 v. 1.18 - 1.75 , p < 0.001 ) and a decrease in the quality of pain ( mean PRI score 2.29 v. 4.55 - 7.71 , p = 0.006 ) compared with the other 3 groups . Clinical significance was evident for the comprehensive massage therapy group and the soft-tissue manipulation group on the measure of function . At 1-month follow-up 63 % of subjects in the comprehensive massage therapy group reported no pain as compared with 27 % of the soft-tissue manipulation group , 14 % of the remedial exercise group and 0 % of the sham laser therapy group . INTERPRETATION Patients with subacute low-back pain were shown to benefit from massage therapy , as regulated by the College of Massage Therapists of Ontario and delivered by experienced massage therapists STUDY DESIGN A r and omized clinical trial . OBJECTIVES To examine the relative efficacy of three active therapies for chronic low back pain . SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is much evidence documenting the efficacy of exercise in the conservative management of chronic low back pain , but many questions remain regarding its exact prescription and method of application . The most successful method must be identified to enable refinement of future rehabilitation programs to target the specific needs of the patient with chronic low back pain and the budget of the healthcare provider . METHODS One hundred forty-eight patients with chronic low back pain were r and omized to one of the following treatments , which they attended twice a week for 3 months : 1 ) modern active physiotherapy , 2 ) muscle reconditioning on training devices , or 3 ) low-impact aerobics . Pretherapy and posttherapy , objective measurements of lumbar mobility were performed , and question naires were administered inquiring about self-rated pain and disability , and psychosocial factors . Similar question naires were administered 6 months after therapy . The data were analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle . RESULTS Of the 148 patients , 16 ( 10.8 % ) dropped out of the therapy . One hundred thirty-seven question naires ( 93 % ) were available for analysis at all three time points . After therapy , significant reductions were observed in pain intensity , frequency , and disability ; Fear-Avoidance Beliefs about physical activity ( FABQactivity ) ; and " praying/hoping , " " catastrophizing , " and " pain behavior " coping strategies -- each with no group differences in the extent of the response . These effects were maintained over the subsequent 6 months , with the exception of disability and FABQactivity for the physiotherapy group . There were small but significant posttherapy increases in lumbar mobility , with aerobics and devices showing a greater response than physiotherapy . CONCLUSION The general lack of treatment specificity suggests that the main effects of the therapies were educed not through the reversal of physical weaknesses targeted by the corresponding exercise modality , but rather through some " central " effect , perhaps involving an adjustment of perception in relation to pain and disability . The direct costs associated with administering physiotherapy were three times as great , and devices four times as great , as those for aerobics . Administration of aerobics as an efficacious therapy for chronic low back pain has the potential to relieve some of the huge financial burden associated with the condition BACKGROUND CONTEXT Restorative exercise and palliative modalities are frequently used together for the treatment of acute low back pain . However , little is known about the effects of combining these treatments . PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of combining continuous low-level heat wrap therapy with directional preference-based exercise on the functional ability of patients with acute low back pain . STUDY DESIGN / SETTING A r and omized controlled trial was conducted at three outpatient medical facilities . PATIENT SAMPLE One hundred individuals ( age 31.2+/-10.6 years ) with low back pain of less than 3 months duration . OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was functional ability assessed by the Multidimensional Task Ability Profile question naire . Secondary outcomes were disability assessed by the Rol and -Morris Disability Question naire and pain relief assessed by a 6-point verbal rating scale . METHODS Participants were r and omized to one of four groups : Heat wrap therapy alone ( heat wrap , n=25 ) ; directional preference-based exercise alone ( exercise , n=25 ) ; combination of heat wrap therapy and exercise ( heat+exercise , n=24 ) ; or control ( booklet , n=26 ) . Treatment was administered for five consecutive days and included four visits to the study center over 1 week . RESULTS At 2 days after the conclusion of treatment ( Day 7 ) , functional improvement for heat+exercise was 84 % , 95 % , and 175 % greater than heat wrap , exercise , and booklet , respectively ( p<.05 ) . Seventy-two percent of the subjects in the heat+exercise group demonstrated a return to pre-injury function compared with 20 % , 20 % , and 19 % for heat wrap , exercise , and booklet , respectively ( p<.05 ) . Disability reduction for heat+exercise was 93 % , 139 % , and 400 % greater than heat wrap , exercise , and booklet , respectively ( p<.05 ) . Pain relief for heat+exercise was 70 % and 143 % greater than exercise and booklet , respectively ( p<.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS Combining continuous low-level heat wrap therapy with directional preference-based exercise during the treatment of acute low back pain significantly improves functional outcomes compared with either intervention alone or control . Either intervention alone tends to be more effective than control A controlled study of different modes of acupuncture stimulation was conducted on patients fulfilling clinical criteria for chronic low back pain of nociceptive origin . Forty patients were r and omly entered into the study . Thirty had three trial treatments with manual stimulation of needles ( MS ) , electrical low frequency stimulation at 2 Hz ( LF ) , and high – frequency stimulation at 80 Hz ( HF ) , and then continued treatment with the mode they felt most benefitted them . Ten patients were put on the waiting list for treatment but served as the untreated control group . The results were evaluated after 6 weeks and at 6 months for : activity related to pain ; mobility ; verbal descriptors of pain and the patient 's subjective assessment of his condition . After 6 weeks , patients receiving treatment showed significant improvement ( P < 0.05 to P < 0.001 ) on three of the four measures compared to the untreated controls . After 6 months a similar measure of significant improvement was seen in patients continuing with low – frequency ( LF ) acupuncture , but not in those groups continuing with manual stimulation ( MS ) or high – frequency ( HF ) acupunture . The results suggest that 2 Hz electrical stimulation is the mode of choice when using acupuncture in the treatment of chronic nociceptive low back pain Two hundred and sixty patients with lumbago or sciatic pain participated in a multicenter observer-blind r and omized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of dipyrone 2.5 g , diclofenac 75 mg , and placebo administered as an intramuscular injection once daily for the duration of one to two days . The effectiveness of the test treatments in relieving sciatic pain was measured by a visual analog scale ( VAS ) before and 30 minutes , 1 , 2 , 3 , 6 and 24 hours after each injection . In addition , the patient 's general well-being was measured on a 5-point rating scale on day 0 , 1 and  
    Output:
    
As a conclusion , the effect of treatments for LBP is only small to moderate .