***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Objective : The authors sought to determine the effect of an educational seminar on interactions with pharmaceutical representatives on residents ’ attitudes and behavior . Method : A controlled trial of an educational intervention was conducted . Residents at a university-affiliated residency program ( N=32 ) were divided into two groups : one group ( N=18 ) received a 1-hour educational intervention , while the other group ( N= 14 ) served as a control . Both groups completed a 33-item survey before the intervention and 2 months after the intervention . Results : Residents interacted substantially with pharmaceutical representatives . The majority of residents found the interactions and gifts useful and believed their prescribing practice s were not influenced . Compared to the comparison group , the intervention group significantly decreased the reported number of office supplies and noneducational gifts , but showed no change in attitude toward pharmaceutical representatives and their gifts . Conclusion : One-time educational interventions may have significant impact on psychiatric residents ’ targeted gift-accepting behavior but little effect on attitudes Purpose To determine the effect of educational interventions on medical students ' attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry marketing practice s and whether restrictive medical school policies governing medicine – industry interactions are associated with student support for banning such interactions . Method Prospect i ve cohort study involving the graduating classes of 2009 ( intervention , n = 474 ) and 2010 ( control , n = 459 ) at four U.S. medical schools . Intervention students experienced a former pharmaceutical representative 's presentation , faculty debate , and a Web-based course . Both groups completed baseline and follow-up attitude surveys about pharmaceutical marketing . Results A total of 482 students ( 51.6 % ) completed both surveys . In regression analyses , intervention students were more likely than control students to think that physicians are strongly or moderately influenced by pharmaceutical marketing ( OR , 2.29 ; 95 % CI , 1.46–3.59 ) and believed they would be more likely to prescribe a company 's drug if they accepted that company 's gifts and food ( OR , 1.68 ; 95 % CI , 1.12–2.52 ) . Intervention students were more likely to support banning interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and students ( OR , 4.82 ; 95 % CI , 3.02–7.68 ) and with physicians ( OR , 6.88 ; 95 % CI , 4.04–11.70 ) . Students from schools with more restrictive policies were more likely to support banning interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and students ( OR , 1.99 ; 95 % CI , 1.26–3.16 ) and with physicians ( OR , 3.44 ; 95 % CI , 2.05–5.79 ) . Conclusions Education about pharmaceutical marketing practice s and more restrictive policies governing medicine – industry interactions seem to increase medical students ' skepticism about the appropriateness of such marketing practice s and disapproval of pharmaceutical representatives in the learning environment 
    Output:
    
Conclusion : The trials conducted to this date regarding curricula on conflicts of interests are method ologically flawed and the described curricula lack important topics beyond marketing strategies of pharmaceutical companies .