***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of systematic patient evaluation and patient and provider feedback on the processes and intermediate outcomes of diabetes care in Independent Practice Association model internal medicine practice s. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Nine practice s providing care to managed care patients were r and omly assigned as intervention or comparison sites . Intervention-site subjects had Annual Diabetes Assessment Program ( ADAP ) assessment s ( HbA(1c  ) , blood pressure , lipids , smoking , retinal photos , urine microalbumin , and foot examination ) at years 1 and 2 . Comparison-site subjects had ADAP assessment s at year 2 . At Intervention sites , year 1 ADAP results were review ed with subjects , mailed to providers , and incorporated into electronic medical records with guideline -generated suggestions for treatment and follow-up . Medical records were evaluated for both groups for the year before both the year 1 and year 2 ADAP assessment s. Processes and intermediate outcomes were compared using linear and logistic mixed hierarchical models . RESULTS Of 284 eligible subjects , 103 of 173 ( 60 % ) at the Intervention sites and 71 of 111 ( 64 % ) at the comparison sites participated ; 83 of 103 ( 81 % ) of the intervention-site subjects returned for follow-up at year 2 . Performance of the six recommended assessment s improved in intervention-site subjects at year 2 compared with year 1 ( 5.8 vs. 4.3 , P = 0.0001 ) and compared with comparison-site subjects at year 2 ( 4.2 , P = 0.014 ) . No significant changes were noted in intermediate outcomes . CONCLUSIONS The ADAP significantly improved processes of care but not intermediate outcomes . Additional interventions are needed to improve intermediate outcomes BACKGROUND In the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 , Congress required the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to test the commercial disease-management model in the Medicare fee-for-service program . METHODS The Medicare Health Support Pilot Program was a large , r and omized study of eight commercial programs for disease management that used nurse-based call centers . We r and omly assigned patients with heart failure , diabetes , or both to the intervention or to usual care ( control )  and compared them with the use of a difference-in-differences method to evaluate the effects of the commercial programs on the quality of clinical care , acute care utilization , and Medicare expenditures for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries . RESULTS The study included 242,417 patients ( 163,107 in the intervention group and 79,310 in the control group ) . The eight commercial disease-management programs did not reduce hospital admissions or emergency room visits , as compared with usual care . We observed only 14 significant improvements in process-of-care measures out of 40 comparisons . These modest improvements came at substantial cost to the Medicare program in fees paid to the disease-management companies ( $ 400 million ) , with no demonstrable savings in Medicare expenditures . CONCLUSIONS In this large study , commercial disease-management programs using nurse-based call centers achieved only modest improvements in quality -of-care measures , with no demonstrable reduction in the utilization of acute care or the costs of care Background and objectives Many clinical management guidelines for chronic diseases have been published , but they have not been put into practice by busy clinicians at primary care levels . This study evaluates the implementation of national guidelines incorporated within a structured diabetes and hypertension clinical record ( SR ) in Cape Town in a r and omised controlled trial ( RCT ) . Methods Eighteen public sector community health centres ( CHC ) were r and omly selected and allocated as intervention or control CHC . At each clinic , 25 patients with diabetes and 35 patients with hypertension were enrolled at baseline . Question naires were completed , blood sample s were collected , blood pressure ( BP ) and anthropometric measures were taken and patient records were audited . SR with clinical guideline prompts were introduced at the intervention clinics after training doctors in their use and suggestions to incorporate them in regular patient records . Contact was maintained during the year of intervention with the clinic staff . A follow-up survey was conducted 1 year later to assess BP and HbA1c , and the patient records were examined to ascertain the extent of use of the SR in the intervention clinics . In-depth interviews were conducted with doctors and nurses to record their response to the intervention . Results The intervention evaluated in this RCT had no impact on either diabetes or hypertension control . In the intervention clinics , less than 60 % of the patient folders contained the SR and when present was seldom used . Although the staff were well disposed to the research team , their workload prohibited them from undertaking a true evaluation of the SR , and overall they did not perceive the SR as supporting their current process of patient care . Conclusions No benefit to diabetes of hypertension care by introducing and availability of the staff in the use of the SR was shown in this RCT . The process measures suggest that the SR was not widely used by the healthcare provided in the primary care clinics OBJECTIVE —The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a multicomponent organizational intervention can produce significant change in diabetes care and outcomes in community primary care practice s. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS —This was a group-r and omized , controlled clinical trial evaluating the practical effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention ( TRANSLATE )  in 24 practice s. The intervention included implementation of an electronic diabetes registry , visit reminders , and patient-specific physician alerts . A site coordinator facilitated previsit planning and a monthly review of performance with a local physician champion . The principle outcomes were the percentage of patients achieving target values for the composite of systolic blood pressure ( SBP ) < 130 mmHg , LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dl , and A1C < 7.0 % at baseline and 12 months . Six process measures were also followed . RESULTS —Over 24 months , 69,965 visits from 8,405 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were recorded from 238 health care providers in 24 practice s from 17 health systems .  Diabetes process measures increased significantly more in intervention than in control practice s , giving net increases as follows : foot examinations 35.0 % ( P < 0.0.001 ) ; annual eye examinations 25.9 % ( P < 0.001 ) ; renal testing 28.5 % ( P < 0.001 ) ; A1C testing 8.1%(P < 0.001 ) ; blood pressure monitoring 3.5 % ( P = 0.05 ) ; and LDL testing 8.6 % ( P < 0.001 ) . Mean A1C adjusted for age , sex , and comorbidity decreased significantly in intervention practice s ( P < 0.02 ) . At 12 months , intervention practice s had significantly greater improvement in achieving recommended clinical values for SBP , A1C , and LDL than control clinics ( P = 0.002 ) . CONCLUSIONS — Introduction of a multicomponent organizational intervention in the primary care setting significantly increases the percentage of type 2 diabetic patients achieving recommended clinical outcomes Technology and improved care coordination models can help diabetes educators and providers meet national care st and ards and provide culturally sensitive diabetes education that may improve diabetes outcomes . The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of a nurse-led diabetes care program ( Comprehensive Diabetes Management Program , CDMP ) for poorly controlled Hispanic type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) patients in an urban community health center setting . Patients were r and omized to the intervention condition ( IC ; n = 21 ) or an attention control condition ( AC ; n = 18 ) . IC and AC conditions were compared on rates of adherence to national clinical practice guidelines ( blood glucose , blood pressure , foot exam , eye exam ) , and levels of diabetes distress , depression , and treatment satisfaction . IC patients had a significant improvement in A1C from baseline to 12-month follow-up compared with AC ( −1.6 % ± 1.4 % versus −0.6 % ± 1.1 % ; P = .01 ) . The proportion of IC patients meeting clinical goals at follow-up tended to be higher than AC for A1c ( IC = 45 % ; AC = 28 % ) , systolic blood pressure ( IC = 55 % ; AC = 28 % ) , eye screening ( IC = 91 % ; AC = 78 % ) , and foot screening , ( IC = 86 % ; AC = 72 % ) . Diabetes distress and treatment satisfaction also showed greater improvement for IC than AC ( P = .05 and P = .06 , respectively ) , with no differences for depression . The CDMP intervention was more effective than an attention control condition in helping patients meet evidence -based guidelines for diabetes care Abstract Objective . To study the effectiveness of a comprehensive diabetes programme in general practice that integrates patient-centred lifestyle counselling into structured diabetes care . Design and setting . Cluster r and omised trial in general practice s. Intervention . Nurse-led structured diabetes care with a protocol , record keeping , reminders , and feedback , plus training in motivational interviewing and agenda setting . Subjects . Primary care nurses in 58 general practice s and their 940 type 2 diabetes patients with an HbA1c concentration above 7 % , and a body mass index ( BMI ) above 25 kg/m2 . Main outcome measures . HbA1c , diet , and physical activity ( medical records and patient question naires ) . Results . Multilevel linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline outcomes showed that despite active nurse participation in the intervention , the comprehensive programme was no more effective than usual care after 14 months , as shown by HbA1c levels ( difference between groups = 0.13 ; CI 20.8–0.35 ) and diet ( fat ( difference between groups = 0.19 ; CI 20.82–1.21 ) ; vegetables ( difference between groups = 0.10 ; CI-0.21–0.41 ) ; fruit ( difference between groups = 20.02 ; CI 20.26–0.22 ) ) , and physical activity ( difference between groups = 21.15 ; CI 212.26–9.97 ) , or any of the other measures of clinical parameters , patient 's readiness to change , or quality of life . Conclusion . A comprehensive programme that integrated lifestyle counselling based on motivational interviewing principles integrated into structured diabetes care did not alter HbA1c or the lifestyle related to diet and physical activity . We thus question the impact of motivational interviewing in terms of its ability to improve routine diabetes care in general practice The objective of this study was to identify the baseline frequency of  eye examinations  for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes in Montana and to determine whether a direct mail reminder increased eye examinations . Using Medicare Part A and Medicare Part B cl aims data , a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes was defined . Eye examination cl aims were identified using billing codes specific for retinal examinations , as well as visits to ophthalmologists and optometrists during which retinal exams were likely to have been performed . A r and om sample of the identified beneficiaries with diabetes received a letter encouraging regular annual retinal examinations . In the first 3-month period after the mailing , the billed eye examination rate for those to whom letters were sent was 2.2 percentage points greater than the rate for those to whom letters were not sent ( 19.4 % vs 17.2 % ; relative risk , 1.13 ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.01 - 1.26 ) . However , 6 months after the letters were sent , there was no longer a significant difference in the rates for these 2 groups ( 32.9 % vs 32.4 % ; relative risk , 1.02 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.94 - 1.10 ) . In this study , direct mail outreach initially influenced the proportion of Medicare beneficiaries receiving an eye examination , but this pattern was not sustained over the 6-month follow-up period OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of adding pharmacists to primary care teams on the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors  in patients with type 2 diabetes . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a r and omized controlled trial with blinded ascertainment of outcomes within primary care clinics in Edmonton , Canada .  Pharmacists performed medication assessment s and limited history and physical examinations and provided guideline -concordant recommendations to optimize medication management . Follow-up contact was completed as necessary . Control patients received usual care . The primary outcome was a ≥10 % decrease in systolic blood pressure at 1 year . RESULTS A total of 260 patients were enrolled , 57 % were women , the mean age was 59 years , diabetes duration was 6 years , and blood pressure was 129/74 mmHg . Forty-eight of 131 ( 37 % ) intervention patients and 30 of 129 ( 23 % ) control patients achieved the primary outcome ( odds ratio 1.9 [ 95 % CI 1.1–3.3 ] ; P = 0.02 ) . Among 153 patients with inadequately controlled hypertension at baseline , intervention patients ( n = 82 ) were significantly more likely than control patients ( n = 71 ) to achieve the primary outcome ( 41 [ 50 % ] vs. 20 [ 28 % ] ; 2.6 [ 1.3–5.0 ] ; P = 0.007 ) and recommended blood pressure targets ( 44 [ 54 % ] vs. 21 [ 30 % ] ; 2.8 [ 1.4–5.4 ] ; P 
    Output:
    
Both DRS-targeted and general QI interventions were effective , particularly when baseline attendance levels were low .
All commonly used QI components and BCTs were associated with significant improvements , particularly in those with poor attendance .
However , BCTs targeting emotional factors around DRS were under-represented .
Cost-effectiveness increased when DRS attendance was lower and with longer screening intervals .
R and omised controlled trial evidence indicates that QI interventions incorporating specific BCT components are associated with meaningful improvements in DRS attendance compared with usual care .
Interventions generally used appropriate BCTs that target important barriers to screening attendance , with a high probability of being cost-effective .