***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Hospital-acquired delirium is a known risk factor for negative outcomes in patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit ( SICU ) . Outcomes worsen as the duration of delirium increases . The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a delirium prevention program and determine whether it decreased the incidence and duration of hospital-acquired delirium in older adults ( age>50 y ) admitted to the SICU . METHODS A prospect i ve pre- or post-intervention cohort study was done at an academic level I trauma center . Older adults admitted to the SICU were enrolled in a delirium prevention program .  Those with traumatic brain injury , dementia , or 0 d of obtainable delirium status were excluded from analysis . The intervention consisted of multidisciplinary education , a pharmacologic protocol to limit medications associated with delirium , and a nonpharmacologic sleep enhancement protocol . Primary outcomes were incidence of delirium and delirium-free days/30 . Secondary outcomes were ventilator-free days/30 , SICU length of stay ( LOS ) , daily and cumulative doses of opioids ( milligram , morphine equivalents ) and benzodiazepines ( milligram , lorazepam equivalents ) , and time spent in severe pain ( greater than or equal to 6 on a scale of 1 - 10 ) . Delirium was measured using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU . Data were analyzed using Chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank sum analysis . RESULTS Of 624 patients admitted to the SICU , 123 met inclusion criteria : 57 preintervention ( 3/12 - 6/12 ) and 66 postintervention ( 7/12 - 3/13 ) . Cohorts were similar in age , gender , ratio of trauma patients , and Injury Severity Score . Postintervention , older adults experienced delirium at the same incidence ( pre 47 % versus 58 % , P=0.26 ) , but for a significantly decreased duration as indicated by an increase in delirium-free days/30 ( pre 24 versus 27 , P=0.002 ) . After intervention , older adults with delirium had more vent-free days ( pre 21 versus 25 , P=0.03 ) , shorter SICU LOS ( pre 13 [ median 12 ] versus 7 [ median 6 ] , P=0.01 ) and were less likely to be treated with benzodiazepines ( pre 85 % versus 63 % , P=0.05 ) with a lower daily dose when prescribed ( pre 5.7 versus 3.6 mg , P=0.04 ) . After intervention , all older adults spent less time in pain ( pre 4.7 versus 3.1 h , P=0.02 ) , received less total opioids ( pre 401 versus 260 mg , P=0.01 ) , and had shorter SICU LOS ( pre 9 [ median 5 ] versus 6 [ median 4 ] , P=0.04 ) . CONCLUSIONS Although delirium prevention continues to be a challenge , this study successfully decreased the duration of delirium for older adults admitted to the SICU . Our simple , cost-effective program led to improved pain and sedation outcomes . Older adults with delirium spent less time on the ventilator and all patients spent less time in the SICU Background : Delirium after acute stroke is a serious complication . Numerous studies support a benefit of multicomponent interventions in minimizing delirium-related complications in at-risk patients , but this has not been reported in acute stroke patients . The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of conducting a r and omized ( delirium care ) versus usual st and ardized stroke care ( usual care ) in reducing delirium in acute stroke . Objective : This pilot study assessed the feasibility of ( 1 ) enrollment within the 48-hour window when delirium risk is greatest , ( 2 ) measuring cognitive function using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment , ( 3 ) delivering interventions 7 days per week , and ( 4 ) determining delirium incidence in stroke-related cognitive dysfunction . Methods : A 2-group r and omized controlled trial was conducted . Patients admitted with ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and 50 years or older , English speaking , and without delirium on admit were recruited , consented , and r and omized to usual care or delirium care groups . Results : Data from 125 subjects ( delirium care , n = 59 ; usual care , n = 66 ) were analyzed . All Montreal Cognitive Assessment subscales were completed by 86 % of subjects ( delirium care , mean [ SD ] , 18.14 [ 6.03 ] ; usual care , mean [ SD ] , 17.61 [ 6.29 ] ) . Subjects in the delirium care group received a mean of 6.10 therapeutic activities ( range , 2–23 ) and daily medication review by a clinical pharmacist using anticholinergic drug calculations . Delirium incidence was 8 % ( 10/125 ) , 3 in the delirium care group and 7 in the usual care group . Conclusion : Findings support the feasibility of delivering a multicomponent delirium prevention intervention in acute stroke and warrants testing intervention effects on delirium outcomes and anticholinergic medication administration OBJECTIVE To develop and vali date a new st and ardized confusion assessment method ( CAM ) that enables nonpsychiatric clinicians to detect delirium quickly in high-risk setting s. DESIGN Prospect i ve validation study . SETTING Conducted in general medicine wards and in an outpatient geriatric assessment center at Yale University ( site 1 ) and in general medicine wards at the University of Chicago ( site 2 ) . PATIENTS The study included 56 subjects , ranging in age from 65 to 98 years . At site 1 , 10 patients with and 20 without delirium participated ; at site 2 , 16 patients with and 10 without delirium participated . MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS An expert panel developed the CAM through a consensus building process . The CAM instrument , which can be completed in less than 5 minutes , consists of nine operationalized criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM-III-R ) . An a priori hypothesis was established for the diagnostic value of four criteria : acute onset and fluctuating course , inattention , disorganized thinking , and altered level of consciousness . The CAM algorithm for diagnosis of delirium required the presence of both the first and the second criteria and of either the third or the fourth criterion . At both sites , the diagnoses made by the CAM were concurrently vali date d against the diagnoses made by psychiatrists . At sites 1 and 2 values for sensitivity were 100 % and 94 % , respectively ; values for specificity were 95 % and 90 % ; values for positive predictive accuracy were 91 % and 94 % ; and values for negative predictive accuracy were 100 % and 90 % . The CAM algorithm had the highest predictive accuracy for all possible combinations of the nine features of delirium . The CAM was shown to have convergent agreement with four other mental status tests , including the Mini-Mental State Examination . The interobserver reliability of the CAM was high ( kappa = 0.81 - 1.0 ) . CONCLUSIONS The CAM is sensitive , specific , reliable , and easy to use for identification of delirium OBJECTIVE To determine the long-term effects on total healthcare costs of the Improving Mood : Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment ( IMPACT ) program for late-life depression compared with usual care . STUDY DESIGN R and omized controlled trial with enrollment from July 1999 through August 2001 . The IMPACT trial , conducted in primary care practice s in 8 delivery organizations across the United States , enrolled 1801 depressed primary care patients 60 years or older . Data are from the 2 IMPACT sites for which 4-year cost data were available . Trial enrollment across these 2 health maintenance organizations was 551 patients . METHODS Participants were r and omly assigned to the  IMPACT intervention  ( n = 279 ) or to  usual primary care ( n = 272 ) . Intervention patients had access to a depression care manager who provided education , behavioral activation , support of antidepressant medication management prescribed by their regular primary care provider , and problem-solving treatment in primary care for up to 12 months . Care managers were supervised by a psychiatrist and a primary care provider . The main outcome measures were healthcare costs during 4 years . RESULTS  IMPACT participants had lower mean total healthcare costs ( $ 29 422 ; 95 % confidence interval , $ 26 479-$32 365 ) than usual care patients ( $ 32 785 ; 95 % confidence interval , $ 27 648-$37 921 ) during 4 years . Results of a bootstrap analysis suggested an 87 % probability that the IMPACT program was associated with lower healthcare costs than usual care . CONCLUSION Compared with usual primary care , the IMPACT program is associated with a high probability of lower total healthcare costs during a 4-year period Background and objectives : delirium is a distressing but potentially preventable condition common in older people in long-term care . It is associated with increased morbidity , mortality , functional decline , hospitalization and significant healthcare costs .  Multicomponent interventions , addressing delirium risk factors , have been shown to reduce delirium by one-third in hospitals . It is not known whether this approach is also effective in long-term care . In previous work , we design ed a bespoke delirium prevention intervention , called ‘ Stop Delirium ! ’ In preparation for a definitive trial of Stop Delirium , we sought to address key aspects of trial design for the particular circumstances of care homes . Design : a cluster r and omized feasibility study with an embedded process evaluation . Setting and participants : residents of 14 care homes for older people in one metropolitan district in the UK . Intervention : Stop Delirium ! : a 16-month-enhanced educational package to support care home staff to address key delirium risk factors . Control homes received usual care . Measurements : we collected data to determine the following : recruitment and attrition ; delirium rates and variability between homes ; feasibility of measuring delirium , re source use , quality of life , hospital admissions and falls ; and intervention implementation and adherence . Results : two-thirds ( 215 ) of eligible care home residents were recruited . One-month delirium prevalence was 4.0 % in intervention and 7.1 % in control homes . Proposed outcome measurements were feasible , although our approach appeared to underestimate delirium . Health economic evaluation was feasible using routinely collected data . Conclusion : a definitive trial of delirium prevention in long-term care is needed but will require some further design modifications and pilot work OBJECTIVE Delirium is a highly prevalent and deleterious disorder in terminally ill cancer patients . We assessed whether a multicomponent preventive intervention was effective in decreasing delirium incidence and severity among cancer patients receiving end-of-life care . METHODS A cohort of 1516 patients was followed from admission to death at seven Canadian palliative care centers . In two of these centers , routine care included a delirium preventive intervention targeting physicians ( written notice on selective delirium risk factors and inquest on intended medication changes ) , patients , and their family ( orientation to time and place , information about early delirium symptoms ) . Delirium frequency and severity were compared between patients at the intervention ( N = 674 ) and usual-care ( N = 842 ) centers based on thrice-daily symptom assessment s with the Confusion Rating Scale . RESULTS The overall rate of adherence to the intervention was 89.7 % . The incidence of delirium was 49.1 % in the intervention group , compared with 43.9 % in the usual-care group ( odds ratio [ OR ] 1.23 , P = 0.045 ) . When confounding variables were controlled for , no difference was observed between the intervention and the usual-care groups in delirium incidence ( OR 0.94 , P = 0.66 ) , delirium severity ( 1.83 vs. 1.92 ; P = 0.07 ) , total days in delirium ( 4.57 vs. 3.57 days ; P = 0.63 ) , or duration of first delirium episode ( 2.9 vs. 2.1 days ; P = 0.96 ) . Delirium-free survival was similar in the two groups . CONCLUSION A simple multicomponent preventive intervention was ineffective in reducing delirium incidence or severity among cancer patients receiving end-of-life care . Delirium prevention remains a difficult challenge in terminally ill cancer patients CONTEXT In the intensive care unit ( ICU ) , delirium is a common yet underdiagnosed form of organ dysfunction , and its contribution to patient outcomes is unclear . OBJECTIVE To determine if delirium is an independent predictor of clinical outcomes , including 6-month mortality and length of stay among ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS Prospect i ve cohort study enrolling 275 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients admitted to adult medical and coronary ICUs of a US university-based medical center between February 2000 and May 2001 . Patients were followed up for development of delirium over 2158 ICU days using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes included 6-month mortality , overall hospital length of stay , and length of stay in the post-IC 
    Output:
    
Several models of care can prevent delirium .
The diverse models of care included here explored interventions adapted to specific care setting s , especially by addressing setting -specific delirium risk factors .