***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE We performed a r and omised trial to evaluate if intensive supervised training of the back should be offered to all patients after a first lumbar diskectomy . METHODS Forty consecutive patients were , after a first lumbar diskectomy , r and omly allocated to 2 groups undergoing " supervised training " twice a week for 3 months in an outpatient clinic or " home training " after 2 hours of instruction . RESULTS The two rehabilitation models both showed a significant effect on spinal mobility , isokinetic trunk flexion strength , isokinetic trunk extension strength and daily function . These improvements were unchanged at follow up 3 months later . The pain score remained unchanged , however , throughout the trial in both groups . No differences in effect between the two rehabilitation models could be found for any of the assessed parameters . Thirteen patients did not complete the trial , including 9 from the supervised endurance trained group , mainly because of increased pain and reprolaps ( n = 4 ) . Four patients dropped out of the home trained group , only one because of increased pain . The differences in drop-out rate and training side effects were , however , not statistically significant . CONCLUSION We conclude that it is not worthwhile to implement 3 months of supervised intensive endurance training as opposed to home training in all cases of first lumbar diskectomy , although a beneficial effect and better compliance might be found for a selected group of such patients STUDY DESIGN A controlled clinical trial . OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of an integrated back stability ( IBS ) programme on a chronic low back pain ( CLBP ) population in a time restricted private clinic environment . BACKGROUND Studies assessing stability training CLBP have reported inconsistent results . Methods used within trials vary , with some authors focusing on muscle isolation and others using whole body movements . IBS uses an exercise progression beginning with posturally based exercise and progressing from muscle isolation through to complex movements . METHODS AND MEASURES Fifty-nine chronic low back patients were divided into control ( n=32 ) and intervention ( n=27 ) groups . Participants in the intervention group were prescribed a 6 week individualized exercise programme in three stages . In stage 1 , exercises addressed posture and movement dysfunction and activated the core stabilizing muscles . In stage 2 , ' back fitness ' was enhanced using progressive exercise principles . Stage 3 emphasized technique specific actions . Participants in the control group received a backcare advice leaflet only . RESULTS Pre- and post-test scores were analysed for each of the outcome measures within the control group using a Wilcoxin signed ranks test . At an alpha level of p < or=0.0071 , no differences were observed . For the intervention group , a Mann-Whitney U-test showed significant differences between groups in the Rol and and Morris Disability Question aire ( RMDQ ) , short form McGill Pain Question naire ( SF-MPQ ) , and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia ( TSK ) ( p < or=0.0071 ) . Patient satisfaction was assessed by question naire , 89 % of patients considering their level of pain and functional impairment acceptable following the programme . CONCLUSION IBS significantly reduced pain and disability in the subject group studied . Patients reported a positive experience of the programme OBJECTIVE : To contrast the efficacy of two exercise programs , segmental stabilization and strengthening of abdominal and trunk muscles , on pain , functional disability , and activation of the transversus abdominis muscle ( TrA ) , in individuals with chronic low back pain . DESIGN : Our sample consisted of 30 individuals , r and omly assigned to one of two treatment groups : segmental stabilization , where exercises focused on the TrA and lumbar multifidus muscles , and superficial strengthening , where exercises focused on the rectus abdominis , abdominus obliquus internus , abdominus obliquus externus , and erector spinae . Groups were examined to discovere whether the exercises created contrasts regarding pain ( visual analogical scale and McGill pain question naire ) , functional disability ( Oswestry disability question naire ) , and TrA muscle activation capacity ( Pressure Biofeedback Unit = PBU ) . The program lasted 6 weeks , and 30‐minute sessions occurred twice a week . Analysis of variance was used for inter‐ and intra‐group comparisons . The significance level was established at 5 % . RESULTS : As compared to baseline , both treatments were effective in relieving pain and improving disability ( p<0.001 ) . Those in the segmental stabilization group had significant gains for all variables when compared to the ST group ( p<0.001 ) , including TrA activation , where relative gains were 48.3 % and ‐5.1 % , respectively . CONCLUSION : Both techniques lessened pain and reduced disability . Segmental stabilization is superior to superficial strengthening for all variables . Superficial strengthening does not improve TrA activation capacity Proper psychomotor performance is needed in work and in activities of daily living , but among subjects with low back pain this area has been studied Little . The present purpose was to evaluate the effect and permanence of a 3-mo . physical exercise program on the psychomotor performance of lower limbs in subjects with low back pain . The associations between psychomotor performance and intensity of low back pain and subjective disability were also evaluated . 90 subjects with nonspecific , subacute low back pain were assigned to one of the three groups : one given three months intensive training , one home exercise , or the control group . Four measurement sessions were made during the 1-yr . study . Psychomotor speed of lower limbs was analyzed with Choice Reaction Time , Movement Time , and Total Response Time . Flight Time of a vertical static jump was also measured . Muscle strength was assessed with conventional methods from trunk , lower limbs , and h and . Intensity of Current Back Pain was analyzed with the Borg scale . Subjective disability was evaluated with the Oswestry Index . Analysis showed that muscle strength and back pain intensity had associations with psychomotor performance but subjective disability or physical activity did not affect it noticeably . There were no changes in Choice Reaction Time , but Total Response Time and Movement Time decreased and Flight Time increased for all subjects . In the first postintervention measurement the home exercise group had significantly lower Movement Time than the intensively trained group . Back Pain Intensity decreased in both exercise groups for those subjects whose psychomotor performance values were below the mean value for the sample Design . R and omized prospect i ve study of the effects of three types of active therapy on back muscle function in chronic low back pain patients . Objectives . To quantify the effects of 3 months active therapy on strength , endurance , activation , and fatigability of the back entensor muscles . Summary of Background Data . Many studies have documented an association between chronic low back pain and diminished muscular performance capacity . Few studies have quantified the changes in these measures following interventions using objective measurement techniques or related them to changes in clinical outcome . Methods . A total of 148 individuals ( 57 % women ) with chronic low back pain ( age , 45.0 ± 10.0 years ; duration of low back pain , 10.9 ± 9.5 years ) were r and omized to a treatment that they attended for 3 months : active physiotherapy , muscle reconditioning on devices , or low-impact aerobics . Before and after therapy , assessment s were made of the following : trunk muscle strength ( in flexion , extension , lateral bending , and axial rotation ) , erector spinae activation ( maximal , and during forward bending movements ) , back extensor endurance ( Biering-S/orensen test ) , and erector spinae fatigability ( determined from changes in the median frequency of the surface electromyographic signal ) during isometric and dynamic tests . Results . A total of 132 of 148 patients ( 89 % ) completed the therapy . Isometric strength in each movement direction increased in all groups post-therapy ( P < 0.0008 ) , most notably in the devices group . Activation of the erector spinae during the extension tests also increased significantly in all groups and showed a weak , but significant , relationship with increased maximal strength ( P = 0.01 ) . Pretherapy 55 % of the subjects showed no relaxation of the back muscles at L5 when in the fully flexed position ; no changes were observed in any group post-therapy . Endurance time during the Biering-S/orensen test increased significantly post-therapy in all groups ( P = 0.0001 ) , but there were no significant changes in EMG-determined fatigability . Fatigability of the lumbar muscles at L5 ( EMG median frequency changes ) during the dynamic test increased post-therapy ( P = 0.0001 ) without group differences . Conclusion . Significant changes in muscle performance were observed in all three active therapy groups post-therapy , which appeared to be mainly due to changes in neural activation of the lumbar muscles and psychological changes concerning , for example , motivation or pain tolerance Study Design . A r and omized controlled study with 12 months intervention . Objective . To study the effectiveness of a training intervention with emphases on the control of lumbar neutral zone ( NZ ) and behavior modeling as secondary prevention of  low back pain ( LBP ) and disability .  Summary of Background Data . Improving the control of lumbar NZ and enhancing muscle activation patterns ensuring spinal stability have been proposed as means for secondary prevention of LBP and disability . In addition , cognitive behavior interventions have been shown to lower the risk of recurrence of LBP and long-term disability . Methods . Middle-aged working men with recent LBP but without severe disability were r and omly allocated to either a training ( TG , n = 52 ) or control group ( CG , n = 54 ) . The aim was to exercise twice a week for 12 months , once guided and once independently . The outcome measures were the changes in intensity of LBP , disability , self-evaluated future work ability , and neuromuscular fitness . Results . The intensity of LBP decreased significantly more ( 39 % ) in the TG than in CG at 12 months . The proportion of subjects with negative expectations about their future work ability decreased in both groups at 6 and 12 months ; however , the proportion was significantly bigger in TG compared with CG ( P = 0.028 ) . There effects on disability indexes and fitness were not statistically significant . Conclusions . Controlling lumbar NZ is a specific form of exercise and daily self-care with potential for prevention of recurrent nonspecific LBP and disability among middle aged working men Abstract Objective : To evaluate effectiveness of an exercise programme in a community setting for patients with low back pain to encourage a return to normal activities . Design : R and omised controlled trial of progressive exercise programme compared with usual primary care management . Patients ' preferences for type of management were elicited independently of r and omisation . Participants : 187 patients aged 18 - 60 years with mechanical low back pain of 4 weeks to 6 months ' duration . Interventions : Exercise classes led by a physiotherapist that included strengthening exercises for all main muscle groups , stretching exercises , relaxation session , and brief education on back care . A cognitive-behavioural approach was used . Main outcome measures : Assessment s of debilitating effects of back pain before and after intervention and at 6 months and 1 year later . Measures included Rol and disability question naire , Aberdeen back pain scale , pain diaries , and use of healthcare services . Results : At 6 weeks after r and omisation , the intervention group improved marginally more than the control group on the disability question naire and reported less distressing pain . At 6 months and 1 year , the intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in the disability question naire score ( mean difference in changes 1.35 , 95 % confidence interval 0.13 to 2.57 ) . At 1 year , the intervention group also showed significantly greater improvement in the Aberdeen back pain scale ( 4.44 , 1.01 to 7.87 ) and reported only 378 days off work compared with 607 in the control group . The intervention group used fewer healthcare re sources . Outcome was not influenced by patients ' preferences . Conclusions : The exercise class was more clinical ly effective than traditional general practitioner management , regardless of patient preference , and was cost effective . Key messages Patients with back pain need to return to normal activities as soon as possible but are often afraid that movement or activity may be harmful An exercise programme led by a physiotherapist in the community and based on cognitive-behavioural principles helped patients to cope better with their pain and function better even one year later Patients ' preferences for type of management did not affect outcome Patients in the intervention group tended to use fewer healthcare re sources and took fewer days off work This type of exercise programme should be more widely Study Design . A r and omized clinical trial with 1-year and 3-year telephone question naire follow-ups . Objective . To report a specific exercise intervention ’s long-term effects on recurrence rates in acute , first-episode low back pain patients . Summary of Background Data . The pain and disability associated with an initial episode of acute low back pain ( LBP ) is known to resolve spontaneously in the short-term in the majority of cases . However , the recurrence rate is high , and recurrent disabling episodes remain one of the most costly problems in LBP . A deficit in the multifidus muscle has been identified in acute LBP patients , and does not resolve spontaneously on resolution of painful symptoms and resumption of normal activity . Any relation between this deficit and recurrence rate was investigated in the long-term . Methods . Thirty-nine patients with acute , first-episode LBP were medically managed and r and omly allocated to either a control group or specific exercise group . Medical management included advice and use of medications . Intervention consisted of exercises aim ed at rehabilitating the multifidus in cocontraction with the transversus abdominis muscle . One year and three years after treatment , telephone question naires were conducted with patients . Results . Question naire results revealed that patients from the specific exercise group experienced fewer recurrences of LBP than patients from the control group . One year after treatment , specific exercise group recurrence was 30 % , and control group recurrence was 84 % ( P < 0.001 ) . Two to three years after treatment , specific exercise group recurrence was 
    Output:
    
High- quality evidence is lacking to make specific clinical recommendations for or against the use of LNMT in the rehabilitation of individuals after MSK injury .