***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVES To evaluate the short- and long-term effects of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in locally confined prostate cancer . METHODS We report the preliminary results of 354 patients ( 199 with a clinical T2 tumor and 155 with a clinical T3 tumor ) of whom 164 r and omly received neoadjuvant total and rogen deprivation using a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone ( LHRH ) analog ( goserelin ) plus flutamide for a period of 3 months . RESULTS Serum prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) levels and prostatic volume decreased from a mean of 19.9 ng/mL and 37.7 cm3 to a mean of 0.8 ng/mL and 26.5 cm3 after 3 months of neoadjuvant therapy .  " Clinical down-staging " was seen in 32 % in the neoadjuvantly treated group . " Pathological downstaging " percentages were 6 % and 16 % in the direct radical prostatectomy group and neoadjuvantly-treated group , respectively ( P < 0.01 ) . In patients with clinical T2 tumors , a significant difference in number of positive margins was shown in favor of the neoadjuvantly treated group ( P < 0.01 ) . In patients with clinical T3 tumors , a significant difference could not be detected ( P = 0.14 ) . In 215 patients with a mean follow-up time of 15 months , the calculated 95 % confidence intervals of mean time of PSA progression-free survival were 26 to 35 months in the neoadjuvantly-treated group and 28 to 37 months in the direct radical prostatectomy group , indicating no significant differences between treatment groups . However , follow-up time is currently too short to draw definite conclusions . CONCLUSIONS These early data confirm high understaging percentages in clinical staging . The clinical relevance of the statistically significant smaller numbers of patients with positive margins in the neoadjuvantly treated group with a clinical T2 tumor will have to be confirmed when further follow-up allows an accurate evaluation of time to PSA progression , local recurrence , and distant metastases . Presently , neoadjuvant therapy is not advisable outside clinical research setting Whether to take hormone therapy is one of the most difficult medical decisions that healthy postmenopausal women face . The apparent coronary benefits ( 1 ) of hormone use are an important part of that decision . Although the data appear consistent in suggesting long-term coronary benefits , the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study ( 2 ) showed an increased risk for coronary events during the first year of therapy in women with existing heart disease ; we also found such an elevated risk in an examination of secondary prevention in the Nurses ' Health Study ( 3 ) . More recently , a report from the Women 's Health Initiative , an ongoing r and omized clinical trial of hormone therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease , suggested similar findings in healthy women ( National Institutes of Health . Press release ) . However , additional data on short-term effects of hormone use in women without previous cardiovascular disease are sparse . Many further questions also remain . Among them is the cardiovascular effect of daily doses lower than the st and ard 0.625 mg of oral conjugated estrogen . Recent studies suggest that lower doses of hormone therapy provide bone benefits ( 4 ) and , compared with higher doses , might decrease the risk for thromboembolism ( 5 ) and reduce endometrial hyperplasia ( 4 ) . However , few data are currently available on the relation between low-dose estrogen and primary prevention of heart disease and stroke . In an earlier report , we examined the relation between postmenopausal hormone therapy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on 16 years of follow-up from the Nurses ' Health Study ( 6 ) . In the current analysis , we have almost 50 % more follow-up time among women taking daily doses less than 0.625 mg and more than 800 additional cases of cardiovascular disease , allowing more precise assessment of specific associations . Thus , we now report on the relation among  low-dose estrogen , short-term hormone use , and cardiovascular events in 70 533 postmenopausal women with no previous cardiovascular disease who were followed for up to 20 years . We also provide additional information on the effects of estrogen combined with progestin . Methods The Nurses ' Health Study Cohort The Nurses ' Health Study began in 1976 when 121 700 female nurses 30 to 55 years of age completed a mailed question naire about their postmenopausal hormone use and medical history , including cardiovascular disease and its risk factors . We up date information with biennial follow-up question naires . Dietary and physical activity question naires were added in 1980 . Cohort follow-up is greater than 90 % . Ascertainment of Hormone Use In 1976 , women were asked about use and duration of hormone therapy after menopause . Beginning in 1978 , we collected information on type of hormones taken , and starting in 1980 , we asked about the dose of oral conjugated estrogen . All information is up date d biennially . Identification of Cardiovascular Disease We identified first occurrences of nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion , fatal coronary disease , and fatal and nonfatal stroke between the return of the 1976 question naire and 1 June 1996 . Nurses who reported a nonfatal infa rct ion or stroke were asked for permission to review their medical records . Nonfatal myocardial infa rct ions were confirmed by hospital records if they met World Health Organization criteria ( 7 ) ( symptoms plus either elevated levels of cardiac enzymes or diagnostic electrocardiograms ) . Infa rct ions that required hospitalization and were corroborated by interview or letter but for which medical records were unobtainable were included as probable . Infa rct ions of indeterminate age discovered on routine examination were excluded . Nonfatal strokes were confirmed by review of medical records if they were characterized by a typical neurologic deficit , were rapid in onset , lasted at least 24 hours , and met the criteria of the National Survey of Stroke ( 8) . We classified strokes as ischemic ( thrombotic or embolic occlusion of a cerebral artery ) , subarachnoid hemorrhage , or intraparenchymal hemorrhage . We excluded subdural hematomas and strokes caused by infection or neoplasia . Strokes that required hospitalization and were corroborated by letter or interview but for which medical records were unavailable were included as probable . Most deaths were reported by the participants ' families . We search ed the National Death Index to identify deaths among nonrespondents to each 2-year question naire ; mortality follow-up was more than 98 % complete ( 9 ) . For all deaths possibly attributable to cardiovascular causes , we requested permission from relatives ( subject to state regulations ) to review the medical records . Deaths were considered to be due to coronary disease if medical records or autopsy findings confirmed a fatal myocardial infa rct ion . We also included coronary disease listed on the death certificate as the underlying cause without another , more plausible cause , if the nurse was known ( from hospital records , family , or other sources ) to have had coronary disease before death . In no case was the cause listed on the death certificate used as the sole criterion for coronary death . Sudden death within 1 hour of the onset of symptoms in participants with no other plausible cause of death besides coronary disease was also included . Fatal strokes were documented by autopsy or hospital records or if stroke was listed as the underlying cause on the death certificate . The category of major coronary heart disease combines nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion and coronary death ; similarly , total stroke includes nonfatal and fatal cases . The category of combined cardiovascular disease includes major coronary heart disease and stroke . Confirmed and probable cases in each category were analyzed together ( 80 % of major coronary events and 73 % of strokes were confirmed ) . In this and previous analyses ( 6 ) , results for probable cases were similar to those for confirmed cases . The investigators conducted all interviews and record review s without knowledge of participants ' hormone use status . Population for Analysis Women who reported stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , angina , coronary revascularization , or cancer ( except nonmelanoma skin cancer ) on the 1976 question naire were excluded because their disease may have caused them to alter their hormone use . Similarly , women who reported such diagnoses on a subsequent question naire were excluded from further analysis . Thus , at the start of each 2-year interval , the base population included no women reporting these diagnoses . Our own studies ( 6 , 10 ) and other studies ( 11 ) have suggested that hormone therapy may differentially affect incident and fatal strokes ; thus , we separately examined deaths due to stroke . In these analyses , we excluded women with cancer and cardiovascular disease at baseline but did not up date the exclusions because the women who develop cardiovascular disease during follow-up are those most likely to die of stroke . We classified women as postmenopausal from the time of natural menopause or hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy .  Women who underwent hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy  were considered postmenopausal when they reached the age at which natural menopause had occurred in 90 % of the cohort ( 54 years for smokers and 56 years for nonsmokers ) . In this cohort , the women 's reports of age at menopause ( 12 ) and type of menopause ( 13 ) were highly accurate . In 1976 , 21 947 postmenopausal women entered the analysis , and 48 586 women were added during follow-up as they became postmenopausal , for a total of 70 533 participants ; 808 825 person-years of follow-up were accrued from 1976 to 1996 . Statistical Analysis For each participant , person-months were allocated to hormone categories according to the 1976 data and were up date d every 2 years ( for estrogen dose , follow-up began in 1980 ) . For analyses of type of hormone therapy , we assigned the regimen reported on the 1978 question naire to women who reported hormone use in 1976 . Analyses of type of hormone therapy were limited to users of oral conjugated estrogen with or without oral medroxyprogesterone acetate  , since these were the most common hormone regimens . If no data were available on hormones in a given time period , women were assigned to a missing category for that time period . To maintain the prospect i ve nature of the study , hormone use ( including duration ) during each 2-year period was established from women 's reports at the start of the period ; thus , we probably underestimate duration of use by an average of 1 year . Follow-up for a participant ended at the first diagnosis of cardiovascular disease , death , or 1 June 1996 , whichever came first . The primary analysis is based on incidence rates for which person-months of follow-up were used as the denominator . We used relative risk as the measure of association , defined as the incidence of cardiovascular events among women in various categories of hormone use divided by the incidence among women who never used hormones . We computed age-specific rates by using 5-year categories ( 14 ) and age-adjusted relative risks by using MantelHaenszel rate ratios ( 15 ) with 95 % CIs ( 16 ) . We used pooled logistic regression  across the ten 2-year time periods to adjust simultaneously for potential confounding factors ( 17 ) . In this approach , independent blocks of person-time are pooled for regression analysis , and time-varying covariates are readily accommo date d by assigning successive blocks of person-time to the covariate values at the start of each follow-up cycle . The dependence of the incidence rates on time is modeled nonparametrically with indicator variables . Simulation studies have established the asymptotic equivalence of pooled logistic regression to Cox regression with time-dependent covariates ( 18 ) . The necessary conditions for this equivalence include relatively short time intervals and small probability of the outcome during each interval , both PURPOSE To determine the potential advantage of and rogen ablation following st and ard external-beam radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced ( clinical or pathologic T3 ; clinical or pathologic node positive ) carcinoma of the prostate . METHODS AND MATERIAL S In 1987 the RTOG initiated a Phase III trial of long-term adjuvant goserelin in definitively irradiated patients with carcinoma of the prostate . A total of 977 patients were accrued to the study of which 945 remain analyzable : 477 on the adjuvant hormone arm ( Arm I ) ; and 468 on the radiation only arm ( Arm II ) with hormones  initiated at relapse . The initial results were reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 1997 . RESULTS With a median follow up of 5.6 years for all patients and 6.0 years for living patients local failure at 8 years was 23 % for Arm I and 37 % for Arm II ( p < 0.0001 ) . Distant metastasis was likewise favorably impacted with the immediate use of hormonal manipulation with a distant metastasis rate in Arm I of 27 % and 37 % in Arm II ( p < 0.0001 ) . Disease-free survival ( NED survival ) and NED survival with PSA of 1.5 ng/mL ( bNED ) or less were both statistically significant in favor of the immediate hormone arm ( both p < 0.000 
    Output:
    
There is a lack of published , reliable evidence describing the effects of ADT on cardiovascular disease risk factors .