***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Introduction .Delirium , or acute confusional state , is a common and serious occurrence among hospitalized older persons . Current estimates suggest that delirium complicates hospital stays for more than 2.3 million older persons each year , involving more than 17.5 million hospital days and accounting for more than $ 4 billion ( 1994 dollars ) of Medicare expenditures . A 40 % reduction was recently reported in the risk for delirium among hospitalized older persons receiving a multicomponent targeted risk factor intervention ( MTI ) strategy to prevent delirium , compared with subjects receiving usual hospital care .  1 Before recommending that this preventive strategy be implemented in clinical practice , however , the cost implication s must be thoroughly examined as well . Methods .The present analysis performs net cost evaluations of the MTI for the prevention of delirium among hospitalized patients . Hospital charge and cost-to-charge ratio data are linked to a data base of 852 subjects , who were treated with MTI or usual care .  Multivariable regression methods were used to help isolate the impact of MTI on hospital costs . These results were then combined with our earlier work on the impact of the MTI on delirium prevention to assess the cost effectiveness of this intervention . Results .The MTI significantly reduced nonintervention costs among subjects at intermediate risk for developing delirium , but not among subjects at high risk . When MTI  intervention costs were included , MTI had no significant effect on overall health care costs in the intermediate risk cohort , but raised overall costs in the high risk group . Conclusions .Because the MTI prevented delirium in the intermediate risk group without raising costs , the conclusion reached is that it is a cost effective treatment option for patients at intermediate risk for developing delirium . In contrast , the results suggest that the MTI is not cost effective for subjects at high risk OBJECTIVE Delirium is a highly prevalent and deleterious disorder in terminally ill cancer patients . We assessed whether a multicomponent preventive intervention was effective in decreasing delirium incidence and severity among cancer patients receiving end-of-life care . METHODS A cohort of 1516 patients was followed from admission to death at seven Canadian palliative care centers . In two of these centers , routine care included a delirium preventive intervention targeting physicians ( written notice on selective delirium risk factors and inquest on intended medication changes ) , patients , and their family ( orientation to time and place , information about early delirium symptoms ) . Delirium frequency and severity were compared between patients at the intervention ( N = 674 ) and usual-care ( N = 842 ) centers based on thrice-daily symptom assessment s with the Confusion Rating Scale . RESULTS The overall rate of adherence to the intervention was 89.7 % . The incidence of delirium was 49.1 % in the intervention group , compared with 43.9 % in the usual-care group ( odds ratio [ OR ] 1.23 , P = 0.045 ) . When confounding variables were controlled for , no difference was observed between the intervention and the usual-care groups in delirium incidence ( OR 0.94 , P = 0.66 ) , delirium severity ( 1.83 vs. 1.92 ; P = 0.07 ) , total days in delirium ( 4.57 vs. 3.57 days ; P = 0.63 ) , or duration of first delirium episode ( 2.9 vs. 2.1 days ; P = 0.96 ) . Delirium-free survival was similar in the two groups . CONCLUSION A simple multicomponent preventive intervention was ineffective in reducing delirium incidence or severity among cancer patients receiving end-of-life care . Delirium prevention remains a difficult challenge in terminally ill cancer patients OBJECTIVES Delirium ( or acute confusional state ) affects 35 % to 65 % of patients after hip-fracture repair , and has been independently associated with poor functional recovery . We performed a r and omized trial in an orthopedic surgery service at an academic hospital to determine whether proactive geriatrics consultation can reduce delirium after hip fracture . DESIGN Prospect i ve , r and omized , blinded . SETTING Inpatient academic tertiary medical center . PARTICIPANTS 126 consenting patients 65 and older ( mean age 79 + /- 8 years , 79 % women ) admitted emergently for surgical repair of hip fracture . MEASUREMENTS Detailed assessment through interviews with patients and design ated proxies and review of medical records was performed at enrollment to ascertain prefracture status . Subjects were then r and omized to proactive geriatrics consultation , which began preoperatively or within 24 hours of surgery , or " usual care . " A geriatrician made daily visits for the duration of the hospitalization and made targeted recommendations based on a structured protocol . To ascertain study outcomes , all subjects underwent daily , blinded interviews for the duration of their hospitalization , including the Mini-Mental State Examination ( MMSE ) , the Delirium Symptom Interview ( DSI ) , and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale ( MDAS ) . Delirium was diagnosed using the Confusion Assessment Method ( CAM ) algorithm . RESULTS The 62 patients r and omized to geriatrics consultation were not significantly different ( P>.1 ) from the 64 usual-care patients in terms of age , gender , prefracture dementia , comorbidity , type of hip fracture , or type of surgical repair . Sixty-one percent of geriatrics consultation patients were seen preoperatively and all were seen within 24 hours postoperatively . A mean of 10 recommendations were made throughout the duration of the hospitalization , with 77 % adherence by the orthopedics team . Delirium occurred in 20 /62 ( 32 % ) intervention patients , versus 32 / 64 ( 50 % ) usual-care patients ( P = .04 ) , representing a relative risk of 0.64 ( 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) = 0.37 - 0.98 ) for the consultation group . One case of delirium was prevented for every 5.6 patients in the geriatrics consultation group . There was an even greater reduction in cases of severe delirium , occurring in 7/ 60 ( 12 % ) of intervention patients and 18 / 62 ( 29 % ) of usual-care patients , with a relative risk of 0.40 ( 95 % CI = 0.18 - 0.89 ) . Despite this reduction in delirium , length of stay did not significantly differ between intervention and usual-care groups ( median + /- interquartile range = 5 + /- 2 days in both groups ) , likely because protocol s and pathways predetermined length of stay . In subgroup analyses , geriatrics consultation was most effective in reducing delirium in patients without prefracture dementia or activities of daily living ( ADL ) functional impairment . CONCLUSIONS Proactive geriatrics consultation was successfully implemented with good adherence after hip-fracture repair . Geriatrics consultation reduced delirium by over one-third , and reduced severe delirium by over one-half . Our trial provides strong preliminary evidence that proactive geriatrics consultation may play an important role in the acute hospital management of hip-fracture patients BACKGROUND delirium is a clinical syndrome associated with multiple short and long-term complications and therefore prevention is an essential part of its management . This study was design ed to assess the efficacy of multicomponent intervention in delirium prevention . METHODS a total of 287 hospitalised patients at intermediate or high risk of developing delirium were r and omised to receive a non-pharmacological intervention delivered by family members  ( 144 patients )  or st and ard management  ( 143 patients ) . The primary efficacy outcome was the occurrence of delirium at any time during the course of hospitalisation . Three vali date d observers performed the event adjudication by using the confusion assessment method screening instrument . RESULTS there were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups . The primary outcome occurred in 5.6 % of the patients in the intervention group and in 13.3 % of the patients in the control group ( relative risk : 0.41 ; confidence interval : 0.19 - 0.92 ; P = 0.027 ) . CONCLUSION the results of this study show that there is a benefit in the non-pharmacological prevention of delirium using family members , when compared with st and ard management of patients at risk of developing this condition BACKGROUND older people undergoing elective surgery have significant post-operative problems prolonging hospitalisation . OBJECTIVE to design , embed , and evaluate an evidence -based comprehensive geriatric assessment ( CGA ) service for at-risk older patients undergoing elective surgery . SETTING urban teaching hospital . SUBJECTS elective surgical patients aged 65 + . INTERVENTION multidisciplinary preoperative CGA service with post-operative follow-through ( proactive care of older people undergoing surgery [ ' POPS ' ] ) . METHODS observational cohort study and multilevel surveys ( development and modelling phase ) . Prospect i ve ' before and after ' comparison ( exploratory evaluation ) . RESULTS findings from the development phase showed high levels of preoperative co-morbidity , no multidisciplinary preoperative input , and multiple potentially preventable post-operative problems delaying discharge in older elective surgery patients . Comparison of 2 cohorts of elective orthopaedic patients ( pre-POPS vs POPS , N = 54 ) showed the POPS group had fewer post-operative medical complications including pneumonia ( 20 % vs 4 % [ p = 0.008 ] ) and delirium ( 19 % vs 6 % [ p = 0.036 ] ) , and significant improvements in areas reflecting multidisciplinary practice including pressure sores ( 19 % vs 4 % [ p = 0.028 ] ) , poor pain control ( 30 % vs 2 % [ p<0.001 ] ) , delayed mobilisation ( 28 % vs 9 % [ p = 0.012 ] ) and inappropriate catheter use ( 20 % vs 7 % [ p = 0.046 ] ) . Length of stay was reduced by 4.5 days . There were fewer delayed discharges relating to medical complications ( 37 % vs 13 % ) or waits for OT assessment or equipment ( 20 % vs 4 % ) . CONCLUSION a proactive evidence -based CGA service for at-risk older elective surgical patients was developed according to MRC framework for complex interventions . Pre/post comparison in elective orthopaedic patients showed improved ( within method ological limitations ) post-operative outcomes indicative of better clinical effectiveness and efficiency , and contributed to the service obtaining mainstream funding . Informed by the present study , a r and omised controlled trial is ongoing Background and aims : Delirium is a common postoperative complication in elderly patients which has a serious impact on outcome in terms of morbidity and costs . We examined whether a postoperative multi-factorial intervention program can reduce delirium and improve outcome in patients with femoral neck fractures . Methods : One hundred and ninety-nine patients , aged 70 years and over ( mean age±SD , 82±6 , 74 % women ) , were r and omly assigned to  postoperative care in a specialized geriatric ward or a conventional orthopedic ward . The intervention consisted of staff education focusing on the assessment , prevention and treatment of delirium and associated complications . The staff worked as a team , applying comprehensive geriatric assessment , management and rehabilitation . Patients were assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination and the Organic Brain Syndrome Scale , and delirium was diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria . Results : The number of days of postoperative delirium among intervention patients was fewer ( 5.0±7.1 days vs 10.2±13.3 days , p=0.009 ) compared with controls . A lower proportion of intervention patients were delirious postoperatively than controls ( 56/102 , 54.9 % vs 73/97 , 75.3 % , p=0.003 ) . Eighteen percent in the intervention ward and 52 % of controls were delirious after the seventh postoperative day ( p<0.001 ) . Intervention patients suffered from fewer complications , such as decubitus ulcers , urinary tract infections , nutritional complications , sleeping problems and falls , than controls . Total postoperative hospitalization was shorter in the intervention ward ( 28.0±17.9 days vs 38.0±40.6 days , p=0.028 ) . Conclusions : Patients with postoperative delirium can be successfully treated , result ing in fewer days of delirium , fewer other complications , and shorter length of hospitalization OBJECTIVES To investigate whether an education program and a reorganization of nursing and medical care improved the outcome for older delirious patients . DESIGN Prospect i ve intervention study . SETTING Department of General Internal Medicine , Sundsvall Hospital , Sweden . PARTICIPANTS Four hundred patients , aged 70 and older , consecutively admitted to an intervention or a control ward . INTERVENTION The intervention consisted of staff education focusing on the assessment , prevention , and treatment of delirium and on caregiver-patient interaction . Reorganization from a task-allocation care system to a patient-allocation system with individualized care . MEASUREMENTS The patients were assessed using the Organic Brain Syndrome Scale and the Mini-Mental State Examination on Days 1 , 3 , and 7 after admission . Delirium was diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Fourth Edition , criteria . RESULTS Delirium was equally common on the day of admission at the two wards , but fewer patients remained delirious on Day 7 on the intervention ward ( n=19/6 
    Output:
    
The evidence from 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria suggests that most multicomponent interventions are effective in preventing onset of delirium in at-risk patients in a hospital setting .