***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Collaboration between physicians and pharmacists is one approach to address drug-related morbidity and achieve therapeutic goals . A collaborative practice of pharmaceutical care has been used in the Fairview Clinics System of Minneapolis-St Paul since 1999 . METHODS The quality of therapeutic determinations made by pharmacists within this collaborative practice of pharmaceutical care was studied by a 12-member panel of physicians and pharmacists who used r and omly selected patient records . This was a quality improvement and care process validation component of a study evaluating the effects of drug therapy management in patients receiving prepaid medical assistance . An implicit review process was used to evaluate the clinical credibility of therapeutic determinations made by pharmaceutical care practitioners . RESULTS A total of 5780 drug therapy problems were resolved for 2524 patients receiving pharmaceutical care . The rate of therapeutic goals achieved increased from 74 % at the time of patients ' initial pharmaceutical care encounters to 89 % at patients ' latest encounters . In this quality assessment analysis panel members performed a total of 4779 evaluations of clinical decisions . Panelists indicated agreement with the evaluations in 94.2 % of cases , expressed a neutral opinion in 3.6 % of cases , and disagreed in 2.2 % of cases . Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.73 to 0.85 . CONCLUSIONS The decisions made by pharmaceutical care practitioners working in collaboration with physicians to provide drug therapy management services are clinical ly credible based on the evaluations and comments of a peer review panel . This study provides information on the quality of care provided by pharmacists when collaborating with physicians to provide drug therapy management services OBJECTIVES to investigate the effectiveness of a  pharmacy discharge plan  in elderly hospitalized patients . DESIGN r and omized controlled trial . SUBJECTS AND SETTING S we r and omized patients aged 75 years and older on four or more medicines who had been discharged from three acute general and one long-stay hospital to a pharmacy intervention or usual care . INTERVENTIONS the hospital pharmacist developed discharge plans which gave details of medication and support required by the patient . A copy was given to the patient and to all relevant professionals and carers . This was followed by a domiciliary assessment by a community pharmacist . In the control group , patients were discharged from hospital following st and ard procedures that included a discharge letter to the general practitioner listing current medications . OUTCOMES the primary outcome was re-admission to hospital within 6 months . Secondary outcomes included the number of deaths , attendance at hospital outpatient clinics and general practice and proportion of days in hospital over the follow-up period , together with patients ' general well-being , satisfaction with the service and knowledge of and adherence to prescribed medication . RESULTS we recruited 362 patients , of whom 181 were r and omized to each group . We collected hospital and general practice data on at least 91 and 72 % of patients respectively at each follow-up point and interviewed between 43 and 90 % of the study subjects . There were no significant differences between the groups in the proportion of patients re-admitted to hospital between baseline and 3 months or 3 and 6 months . There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes . CONCLUSIONS we found no evidence to suggest that the co-ordinated hospital and community pharmacy care discharge plans in elderly patients in this study influence outcomes The effect of clinical pharmacy services on  prescribing patterns and drug costs for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ( NSAIDs ) and salicylates in a primary -care clinic operated by a health-maintenance organization ( HMO ) was studied . Two pharmacists provided clinical services to a r and omly selected cluster of family practice physicians in the HMO for six months . A second family practice cluster served as a control group . The pharmacists alerted prescribers to the availability of low-cost alternatives ( such as ibuprofen and salicylates ) and review ed the medication profiles of patients receiving high-cost NSAIDs . Data were collected for both physician clusters for nine months before and six months after the pharmacists ' intervention . Changes in the mean numbers of prescriptions for ibuprofen and piroxicam  per 1000 enrollees per physician in the baseline and evaluation periods were not significantly different between the two groups . Significantly more prescriptions for salicylates  were written by physicians in the intervention group than in the control group during the evaluation period . Annualized mean drug ingredient costs per enrollee and per prescription for NSAIDS and salicylates  decreased during the evaluation period in both groups , but these differences were not significant . In relatively unstructured interactions with physicians and nurses , clinical pharmacists were not able to reduce the costs associated with NSAIDs but did have a modest effect on altering  salicylate prescribing patterns . This clinical pharmacy program was not economically self-sustaining during the first six months of operation , since operating costs exceeded anticipated savings Purpose To examine the impact of systematic medication reconciliations upon hospital admission and of a medication review while in hospital on the number of inappropriate medications and unscheduled drug-related hospital revisits in elderly patients . Methods This was a prospect i ve , controlled study in 210 patients , aged 65 years or older , who were admitted to one of three internal medicine wards at a University Hospital in Sweden . Intervention patients received the complete Lund Integrated Medicines Management model ( medication reconciliation upon admission and discharge , and medication review and monitoring ) provided by a multi-professional team , including a clinical pharmacist . Control patients received st and ard care and medication reconciliation upon discharge . Blinded review ers evaluated the appropriateness of the prescribing ( using the Medication Appropriateness Index ) on admission and discharge , and assessed the probability that a drug-related problem was the reason for any patient readmitted to hospital or visiting the emergency department within 3 months of discharge ( using World Health Organisation causality criteria ) . Results There was a greater decrease in the number of inappropriate drugs in the intervention group than in the control group for both the intention-to-treat population { 51 % [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 43–58 % ] vs. 39 % ( 95 % CI 30–48 % ) ; p = 0.0446 } and the per- protocol population [ 60 % ( 95 % CI 51–67 % ) vs. 44 % ( 95 % CI 34–52 % ) ; p = 0.0106 ) ] . There were six revisits to hospital in the intervention group which were judged as ‘ possibly , probably or certainly drug-related ’ , compared with 12 in the control group ( p = 0.0469 ) . Conclusions In this study , medication reconciliation and review provided by a clinical pharmacist in a multi-professional team significantly reduced the number of inappropriate drugs and unscheduled drug-related hospital revisits among elderly patients BACKGROUND The pharmaceutical care approach serves as a model for medication review , involving collaboration between GPs , pharmacists , patients , and carers . Its use is advocated with older patients who are typically prescribed several drugs . However , it has yet to be thoroughly evaluated . AIM To estimate the effectiveness of pharmaceutical care for older people , shared between GPs and community pharmacists in the UK , relative to usual care . DESIGN OF STUDY Multiple interrupted time-series design in five primary care trusts which implemented pharmaceutical care at 2-month intervals in r and om order . Patients acted as their own controls , and were followed over 3 years including their 12 months ' participation in pharmaceutical care . SETTING In 2002 , 760 patients , aged > or = 75 years , were recruited from 24 general practice s in East and North Yorkshire . Sixty-two community pharmacies also took part . A total of 551 participants completed the study . METHOD Pharmaceutical care was undertaken by community pharmacists who interviewed patients , developed and implemented pharmaceutical care plans together with patients ' GPs , and thereafter undertook monthly medication review s. Pharmacists and GPs attended training before the intervention . Outcome measures were the UK Medication Appropriateness Index , the Short Form-36 Health Survey ( SF-36 ) , and serious adverse events . RESULTS The intervention did not lead to any statistically significant change in the appropriateness of prescribing or health outcomes . Although the mental component of the SF-36 decreased as study participants become older , this trend was not affected by pharmaceutical care . CONCLUSION The RESPECT model of pharmaceutical care ( R and omised Evaluation of Shared Prescribing for Elderly people in the Community over Time ) shared between community pharmacists and GPs did not significantly change the appropriateness of prescribing or quality of life in older patients BACKGROUND Studies have demonstrated that blood pressure ( BP ) control can be improved when clinical pharmacists assist with patient management . The objective of this study was to evaluate if a physician and pharmacist collaborative model in community-based medical offices could improve BP control . METHODS This was a prospect i ve , cluster r and omized , controlled clinical trial with clinics r and omized to a control group ( n = 3 ) or to an intervention group ( n = 3 ) . The study enrolled 402 patients ( mean age , 58.3 years ) with uncontrolled hypertension .  Clinical pharmacists made drug therapy recommendations to physicians based on national guidelines . Research nurses performed BP measurements and 24-hour BP monitoring . RESULTS The mean ( SD ) guideline adherence scores increased from 49.4 ( 19.3 ) at baseline to 53.4 ( 18.1 ) at 6 months ( 8.1 % increase ) in the control group and from 40.4 ( 22.6 ) at baseline to 62.8 ( 13.5 ) at 6 months ( 55.4 % increase ) in the intervention group ( P = .09 for adjusted between-group comparison ) . The mean BP decreased 6.8/4.5 mm Hg in the control group and 20.7/9.7 mm Hg in the intervention group ( P < .05 for between-group systolic BP comparison ) . The adjusted difference in systolic BP was -12.0 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , -24.0 to 0.0 ) mm Hg , while the adjusted difference in diastolic BP was -1.8 ( 95 % CI , -11.9 to 8.3 ) mm Hg . The 24-hour BP levels showed similar effect sizes . Blood pressure was controlled in 29.9 % of patients in the control group and in 63.9 % of patients in the intervention group ( adjusted odds ratio , 3.2 ; 95 % CI , 2.0 - 5.1 ; P < .001 ) . CONCLUSIONS A physician and pharmacist collaborative intervention achieved significantly better mean BP and overall BP control rates compared with a control group . Additional research should be conducted to evaluate efficient strategies to implement team-based chronic disease management . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00201019 Abstract Objective : To determine whether a pharmacist can effectively review repeat prescriptions through consultations with elderly patients in general practice . Design : R and omised controlled trial of clinical medication review by a pharmacist against normal general practice review . Setting : Four general practice s. Participants : 1188 patients aged 65 or over who were receiving at least one repeat prescription and living in the community . Intervention : Patients were invited to a consultation at which the pharmacist review ed their medical conditions and current treatment . Main outcome measures : Number of changes to repeat prescriptions over one year , drug costs , and use of healthcare services . Results : 590 ( 97 % ) patients in the intervention group were review ed compared with 233 ( 44 % ) in the control group . Patients seen by the pharmacist were more likely to have changes made to their repeat prescriptions ( mean number of changes per patient 2.2 v 1.9 ; difference=0.31 , 95 % confidence interval 0.06 to 0.57 ; P=0.02 ) . Monthly drug costs rose in both groups over the year , but the rise was less in the intervention group ( mean difference £ 4.72 per 28 days , −£7.04 to -£2.41 ) ; equivalent to £ 61 per patient a year . Intervention patients had a smaller rise in the number of drugs prescribed ( 0.2 v 0.4 ; mean difference −0.2 , −0.4 to −0.1 ) . There was no evidence that review of treatment by the pharmacist affected practice consultation rates , outpatient consultations , hospital admissions , or death rate . Conclusions : A clinical pharmacist can conduct effective consultations with elderly patients in general practice to review their drugs . Such review results in significant changes in patients ' drugs and saves more than the cost of the intervention without affecting the workload of general practitioners . What is already known on this topic Review of patients on long term drug treatment is important but is done inadequately Evidence from the United States shows that pharmacists can improve patient care by review ing drug treatment What this study adds Consultations with a clinical pharmacist are an effective method of review ing the drug treatment of older patients Review by a pharmacist results in more drug changes and lower prescribing costs than normal care plus a much higher review rate Use of healthcare services by patients is not Background —R and omized controlled trials have demonstrated that collaborative medication review s can improve outcomes for patients with heart failure . We aim ed to determine whether these results translated into Australian practice , where collaborative review s are nationally funded . Methods and Results —This retrospective cohort study using administrative cl aims data included veterans 65 years and older receiving bis 
    Output:
    
Patient involvement is important for long-term success