***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Aim To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mobile phone intervention to improve exercise capacity and physical activity behaviour in people with ischaemic heart disease ( IHD ) . Methods and results In this single-blind , parallel , two-arm , r and omized controlled trial adults ( n = 171 ) with IHD were r and omized to receive a mobile phone delivered intervention  ( HEART ; n = 85 ) plus usual care , or usual care alone ( n = 86 ) . Adult participants aged 18 years or more , with a diagnosis of IHD , were clinical ly stable as out patients , able to perform exercise , able to underst and and write English , and had access to the Internet . The HEART ( Heart Exercise And Remote Technologies ) intervention involved a personalized , automated package of text messages and a secure website with video messages aim ed at increasing exercise behaviour , delivered over 24 weeks . All participants were able to access usual community-based cardiac rehabilitation , which involves encouragement of physical activity and an offer to join a local cardiac support club . All outcomes were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks and included peak oxygen uptake ( PVO2 ; primary outcome ) , self-reported physical activity , health-related quality of life , self-efficacy and motivation ( secondary outcomes ) . Results showed no differences in PVO2 between the two groups ( difference −0.21 ml kg−1 min−1 , 95 % CI : −1.1 , 0.7 ; p = 0.65 ) at 24 weeks . However significant treatment effects were observed for selected secondary outcomes , including leisure time physical activity ( difference 110.2 min/week , 95 % CI : −0.8 , 221.3 ; p = 0.05 ) and walking ( difference 151.4 min/week , 95 % CI : 27.6 , 275.2 ; p = 0.02 ) . There were also significant improvements in self-efficacy to be active ( difference 6.2 % , 95 % CI : 0.2 , 12.2 ; p = 0.04 ) and the general health domain of the SF36 ( difference 2.1 , 95 % CI : 0.1 , 4.1 ; p = 0.03 ) at 24 weeks . The HEART programme was considered likely to be cost-effective for leisure time activity and walking . Conclusions A mobile phone intervention was not effective at increasing exercise capacity over and above usual care . The intervention was effective and probably cost-effective for increasing physical activity and may have the potential to augment existing cardiac rehabilitation services Background : The CardioFit internet-based expert system was design ed to promote physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease ( CHD ) who were not participating in cardiac rehabilitation . Design : This r and omized controlled trial compared CardioFit to usual care to assess its effects on physical activity following hospitalization for acute coronary syndromes . Methods : A total of 223 participants were recruited at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute or London Health Sciences Centre and r and omly assigned to either  CardioFit  ( n = 115 ) or  usual care ( n = 108 ) . The CardioFit group received a personally tailored physical-activity plan upon discharge from the hospital and access to a secure website for activity planning and tracking . They completed five online tutorials over a 6-month period and were in email contact with an exercise specialist . Usual care consisted of physical activity guidance from an attending cardiologist .  Physical activity was measured by pedometer and self-reported over a 7-day period , 6 and 12 months after r and omization . Results : The CardioFit internet-based physical activity expert system significantly increased objective ly measured ( p = 0.023 ) and self-reported physical activity ( p = 0.047 ) compared to usual care . Emotional ( p = 0.038 ) and physical ( p = 0.031 ) dimensions of heart disease health-related quality of life were also higher with CardioFit compared to usual care . Conclusions : Patients with CHD using an internet-based activity prescription with online coaching were more physically active at follow up than those receiving usual care . Use of the CardioFit program could extend the reach of rehabilitation and secondary -prevention services OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ) program on post-coronary arteries bypass graft patients . METHODS This is a r and omized study conducted in King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital , Jeddah , Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between June 2008 and January 2010 . Forty-nine participants were r and omized to either a control group ( st and ard hospital treatment , n=21 ) or an intervention group ( home-based CR , n=28 ) . Data were collected before hospital discharge ( baseline test ) and repeated 6 months after hospital discharge ( follow-up test ) . RESULTS There were no significant differences between the groups in the body mass index , hemodynamics , serum fasting lipid profile , and Quality of Life question naire ( QoL ) ( p>0.05 ) , with differences in physical function and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales ( HADS ) ( p<0.05 ) at the baseline test . At the follow-up test , the intervention group showed greater improvement in health-related QoL and risk factors compared to the control group , with significant differences in fasting blood glucose , triglycerides , high density lipoprotein cholesterol , physical function , and both QoL and HADS question naires ( p<0.05 ) . The intervention group also demonstrated significant improvements in QoL , HADS , body mass index , heart rate , high density lipoprotein cholesterol and physical function ( p<0.05 ) , while significant differences were observed in the control group in heart rate , QoL and physical function ( p<0.05 ) . CONCLUSION The home-based CR program improves health-related QoL and risk factor profiles for patients following coronary arteries bypass graft to greater extent than the st and ard hospital care Background : The results of research into the outcomes of physical rehabilitation and its relationship with post-myocardial ischaemia survival and readmissions are inconclusive . Our primary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of a supervised exercise training programme in terms of decreasing hospital cardiac readmission in patients with myocardial ischaemia . Methods : We conducted a r and omised controlled trial including patients with myocardial ischaemia . Eligible patients were assigned to a control group receiving st and ard care or to an intervention group that took part in a supervised exercise training programme . The follow-up period was 12 months after hospital discharge . Results : Of 478 patients assessed for eligibility , 86 were r and omised to the control group ( n = 44 ) or the intervention group ( n = 42 ) .  Cardiac readmission rates were 14 % versus 5 % ( p = 0.268 ) in the control and intervention groups , respectively , and all-cause readmission rates were 23 % versus 15 % ( p = 0.34 ) . There were no deaths in either group . More control patients were treated in the emergency services ( 50 % vs. 24 % ; p = 0.015 ) . In terms of health-related quality of life , patients in the intervention group presented with significant increases in functional capacity and mobility . More intervention patients returned to work ( 77.3 % vs. 36.0 % ; p = 0.005 ) . Conclusions : The supervised physical exercise programme was effective at reducing the number of emergency room visits and at increasing the percentage of patients who returned to work . It also improved patients ’ exercise capacity and increased their health-related quality of life . Although the results were promising , the programme was not associated with a significant reduction in cardiac and all-cause readmission rates The Women ’s Lifestyle Heart Trial was a small ( N=28 ) r and omized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of a comprehensive lifestyle self-management program ( very low-fat vegetarian diet , stress-management training , exercise , group support , and smoking cessation ) on reduction of cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease ( CHD ) . Women assigned to the treatment condition ( Prime Time ) participated in a week-long retreat followed by twice-weekly 4-hour meetings . Endpoints were program adherence ; changes in lipid profiles , body mass , blood pressure , hypolipidemic and antihypertensive medications ; and quality of life . Risk factor and psychosocial evaluations were conducted at baseline and at 4 , 12 , and 24 months . Repeated measures analyses of covariance revealed that the dietary , stress management , and physical activity changes made by intervention women were dramatic and lasting . There were significantly greater improvements in the Prime Time condition compared to the usual care control group on body mass , angina symptoms , and quality of life , and a tendency for a greater reduction in blood pressure-lowering medications . Similar patterns were seen in lipids , blood pressure , and lipid-lowering medications , but did not reach significance . These results demonstrate that postmenopausal CHD women can make lasting lifestyle changes , and that these changes may reduce the need for cardiac medications and improve CHD risk factors and quality of life Drug therapy for hypercholesterolaemia has remained controversial mainly because of insufficient clinical trial evidence for improved survival . The present trial was design ed to evaluate the effect of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin on mortality and morbidity in patients with coronary heart disease ( CHD ) . 4444 patients with angina pectoris or previous myocardial infa rct ion and serum cholesterol 5.5 - 8.0 mmol/L on a lipid-lowering diet were r and omised to double-blind treatment with simvastatin or placebo . Over the 5.4 years median follow-up period , simvastatin produced mean changes in total cholesterol , low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol , and high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol of -25 % , -35 % , and + 8 % , respectively , with few adverse effects . 256 patients ( 12 % ) in the placebo group died , compared with 182 ( 8 % ) in the simvastatin group . The relative risk of death in the simvastatin group was 0.70 ( 95 % CI 0.58 - 0.85 , p = 0.0003 ) . The 6-year probabilities of survival in the placebo and simvastatin groups were 87.6 % and 91.3 % , respectively . There were 189 coronary deaths in the placebo group and 111 in the simvastatin group ( relative risk 0.58 , 95 % CI 0.46 - 0.73 ) , while noncardiovascular causes accounted for 49 and 46 deaths , respectively . 622 patients ( 28 % ) in the placebo group and 431 ( 19 % ) in the simvastatin group had one or more major coronary events . The relative risk was 0.66 ( 95 % CI 0.59 - 0.75 , p < 0.00001 ) , and the respective probabilities of escaping such events were 70.5 % and 79.6 % . This risk was also significantly reduced in subgroups consisting of women and patients of both sexes aged 60 or more . Other benefits of treatment included a 37 % reduction ( p < 0.00001 ) in the risk of undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures . This study shows that long-term treatment with simvastatin is safe and improves survival in CHD patients Background It is widely believed that cardiac rehabilitation following acute myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) reduces mortality by approximately 20 % . This belief is based on systematic review s and meta-analyses of mostly small trials undertaken many years ago . Clinical management has been transformed in the past 30–40 years and the findings of historical trials may have little relevance now . Objectives The principal objective was to determine the effect of cardiac rehabilitation , as currently provided , on mortality , morbidity and health-related quality of life in patients following MI . The secondary objectives included seeking programmes that may be more effective and characteristics of patients who may benefit more . Design , setting , patients , outcome measures A multi-centre r and omised controlled trial in representative hospitals in Engl and and Wales compared 1813 patients referred to comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programmes or discharged to ‘ usual care ’ ( without referral to rehabilitation ) .  The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 2 years . The secondary measures were morbidity , health service use , health-related quality of life , psychological general well-being and lifestyle cardiovascular risk factors at 1 year . Patient entry ran from 1997 to 2000 , follow-up of secondary outcomes to 2001 and of vital status to 2006 . A parallel study compared 331 patients in matched ‘ elective ’ rehabilitation and ‘ elective ’ usual care ( without rehabilitation ) hospitals . Results There were no significant differences between patients referred to rehabilitation and controls in mortality at 2 years ( RR 0.98 , 95 % CI 0.74 to 1.30 ) or after 7–9 years ( 0.99 , 95 % CI 0.85 to 1.15 ) , cardiac events , seven of eight domains of the health-related quality of life scale ( ‘ Short Form 36 ’ , SF36 ) or the psychological general well-being scale . Rehabilitation patients reported slightly less physical activity . No differences between groups were reported in perceived overall quality of cardiac aftercare . Data from the ‘ elective ’ hospitals comparison concurred with these findings . Conclusion In this trial , comprehensive rehabilitation following MI had no important effect on mortality , cardiac or psychological morbidity , risk factors , health-related quality of life or activity . This finding is consistent with systematic review s of all trials reported since 1983 . The value of cardiac rehabilitation as pract 
    Output:
    
AND IMPLICATION S OF KEY FINDINGS Our analysis indicates conclusively that the current approach to exercise-based CR has no effect on all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality , when compared with a no-exercise control .
There may be a small reduction in hospital admissions following exercise-based CR that is unlikely to be clinical ly important .