***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Mitoxantrone-based chemotherapy palliates pain without extending survival in men with progressive and rogen-independent prostate cancer . We compared docetaxel plus estramustine with mitoxantrone plus prednisone in men with metastatic , hormone-independent prostate cancer . METHODS We r and omly assigned 770 men to one of two treatments , each given in 21-day cycles : 280 mg of estramustine three times daily on days 1 through 5 , 60 mg of docetaxel per square meter of body-surface area on day 2 , and 60 mg of dexamethasone in three divided doses before docetaxel , or 12 mg of mitoxantrone per square meter on day 1 plus 5 mg of prednisone twice daily . The primary end point was overall survival ; secondary end points were progression-free survival , objective response rates , and post-treatment declines of at least 50 percent in serum prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) levels . RESULTS Of 674 eligible patients , 338 were assigned to receive docetaxel and estramustine and 336 to receive mitoxantrone and prednisone . In an intention-to-treat analysis , the median overall survival was longer in the group given docetaxel and estramustine than in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone ( 17.5 months vs. 15.6 months , P=0.02 by the log-rank test ) , and the corresponding hazard ratio for death was 0.80 ( 95 percent confidence interval , 0.67 to 0.97 ) . The median time to progression was 6.3 months in the group given docetaxel and estramustine and 3.2 months in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone ( P<0.001 by the log-rank test ) . PSA declines of at least 50 percent occurred in 50 percent and 27 percent of patients , respectively ( P<0.001 ) , and objective tumor responses were observed in 17 percent and 11 percent of patients with bidimensionally measurable disease , respectively ( P=0.30 ) . Grade 3 or 4 neutropenic fevers ( P=0.01 ) , nausea and vomiting ( P<0.001 ) , and cardiovascular events ( P=0.001 ) were more common among patients receiving docetaxel and estramustine than among those receiving mitoxantrone and prednisone .  Pain relief was similar in both groups . CONCLUSIONS The improvement in median survival of nearly two months with docetaxel and estramustine , as compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone , provides support for this approach in men with metastatic , and rogen-independent prostate cancer A series of three dose escalating studies were conducted to investigate the ability of the 17α-hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase inhibitor abiraterone acetate , to cause maximum suppression of testosterone synthesis when delivered to castrate and noncastrate males with prostate cancer . Study A was a single dose study in castrate males . Study B was a single dose study in noncastrate males and study C was a multiple dose study in noncastrate males . The drug was given orally in a once-daily dose and blood sample s taken to assess pharmacokinetic ( PK ) parameters and hormone levels in all patients . The study drug was well tolerated with some variability in PKs . Suppression of testosterone levels to < 0.14 nmol l−1 was seen in four out of six castrate males treated with a single dose of 500 mg . At 800 mg given days 1–12 in noncastrate males , target suppression was achieved in three out of three patients , but a two- to three-fold increase of Luteinising Hormone ( LH ) levels in two out of three patients overcame suppression within 3 days . All patients in the multiple dose study developed an abnormal response to a short Synacthen test by day 11 , although baseline cortisol levels remained normal . This is the first report of the use of a specific 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase inhibitor in humans . Repeated treatment of men with intact gonadal function  with abiraterone acetate at a dose of 800 mg can successfully suppress testosterone levels to the castrate range . However , this level of suppression may not be sustained in all patients due to compensatory hypersecretion of LH . The enhanced testosterone suppression achieved in castrate men merits further clinical study as a second-line hormonal treatment for prostate cancer . Adrenocortical suppression may necessitate concomitant administration of replacement glucocorticoid Summary Background Long-term hormone therapy has been the st and ard of care for advanced prostate cancer since the 1940s . STAMPEDE is a r and omised controlled trial using a multiarm , multistage platform design . It recruits men with high-risk , locally advanced , metastatic or recurrent prostate cancer who are starting first-line long-term hormone therapy .  We report primary survival results for three research comparisons testing the addition of zoledronic acid , docetaxel , or their combination to st and ard of care versus st and ard of care alone . Methods St and ard of care was hormone therapy for at least 2 years ; radiotherapy was encouraged for men with N0M0 disease to November , 2011 , then m and ated ; radiotherapy was optional for men with node-positive non-metastatic ( N+M0 ) disease . Stratified r and omisation ( via minimisation ) allocated men 2:1:1:1 to st and ard of care only ( SOC-only ; control ) , st and ard of care plus zoledronic acid ( SOC + ZA ) , st and ard of care plus docetaxel ( SOC + Doc ) , or st and ard of care with both zoledronic acid and docetaxel ( SOC + ZA + Doc ) . Zoledronic acid ( 4 mg ) was given for six 3-weekly cycles , then 4-weekly until 2 years , and docetaxel ( 75 mg/m2 ) for six 3-weekly cycles with prednisolone 10 mg daily . There was no blinding to treatment allocation . The primary outcome measure was overall survival . Pairwise comparisons of research versus control had 90 % power at 2·5 % one-sided α for hazard ratio ( HR ) 0·75 , requiring roughly 400 control arm deaths . Statistical analyses were undertaken with st and ard log-rank-type methods for time-to-event data , with hazard ratios ( HRs ) and 95 % CIs derived from adjusted Cox models . This trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov ( NCT00268476 ) and ControlledTrials.com ( IS RCT N78818544 ) . Findings 2962 men were r and omly assigned to four groups between Oct 5 , 2005 , and March 31 , 2013 . Median age was 65 years ( IQR 60–71 ) . 1817 ( 61 % ) men had M+ disease , 448 ( 15 % ) had N+/X M0 , and 697 ( 24 % ) had N0M0 . 165 ( 6 % ) men were previously treated with local therapy  , and median prostate-specific antigen was 65 ng/mL ( IQR 23–184 ) . Median follow-up was 43 months ( IQR 30–60 ) . There were 415 deaths in the control group ( 347 [ 84 % ] prostate cancer ) . Median overall survival was 71 months ( IQR 32 to not reached ) for SOC-only , not reached ( 32 to not reached ) for SOC + ZA ( HR 0·94 , 95 % CI 0·79–1·11 ; p=0·450 ) , 81 months ( 41 to not reached ) for SOC + Doc ( 0·78 , 0·66–0·93 ; p=0·006 ) , and 76 months ( 39 to not reached ) for SOC + ZA + Doc ( 0·82 , 0·69–0·97 ; p=0·022 ) . There was no evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect ( for any of the treatments ) across prespecified subsets . Grade 3–5 adverse events were reported for 399 ( 32 % ) patients receiving SOC , 197 ( 32 % ) receiving SOC + ZA , 288 ( 52 % ) receiving SOC + Doc , and 269 ( 52 % ) receiving SOC + ZA + Doc . Interpretation Zoledronic acid showed no evidence of survival improvement and should not be part of st and ard of care for this population . Docetaxel chemotherapy , given at the time of long-term hormone therapy initiation , showed evidence of improved survival accompanied by an increase in adverse events . Docetaxel treatment should become part of st and ard of care for adequately fit men commencing  long-term hormone  therapy . Funding Cancer Research UK , Medical Research Council , Novartis , Sanofi-Aventis , Pfizer , Janssen , Astellas , NIHR Clinical Research Network , Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND Mitoxantrone plus prednisone reduces pain and improves the quality of life in men with advanced , hormone-refractory prostate cancer , but it does not improve survival . We compared such treatment with docetaxel plus prednisone in men with this disease . METHODS From March 2000 through June 2002 , 1006 men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer received 5 mg of prednisone twice daily  and were r and omly assigned to receive 12 mg of mitoxantrone per square meter of body-surface area every three weeks , 75 mg of docetaxel per square meter every three weeks , or 30 mg of docetaxel per square meter weekly for five of every six weeks . The primary end point was overall survival . Secondary end points were pain , prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) levels , and the quality of life . All statistical comparisons were against mitoxantrone . RESULTS As compared with the men in the mitoxantrone group , men in the group given docetaxel every three weeks had a hazard ratio for death of 0.76 ( 95 percent confidence interval , 0.62 to 0.94 ; P=0.009 by the stratified log-rank test ) and those given weekly docetaxel had a hazard ratio for death of 0.91 ( 95 percent confidence interval , 0.75 to 1.11 ; P=0.36 ) . The median survival was 16.5 months in the mitoxantrone group , 18.9 months in the group given docetaxel every 3 weeks , and 17.4 months in the group given weekly docetaxel . Among these three groups , 32 percent , 45 percent , and 48 percent of men , respectively , had at least a 50 percent decrease in the serum PSA level ( P<0.001 for both comparisons with mitoxantrone ) ; 22 percent , 35 percent ( P=0.01 ) , and 31 percent ( P=0.08 ) had predefined reductions in pain ; and 13 percent , 22 percent ( P=0.009 ) , and 23 percent ( P=0.005 ) had improvements in the quality of life . Adverse events were also more common in the groups that received docetaxel . CONCLUSIONS When given with prednisone , treatment with docetaxel every three weeks led to superior survival and improved rates of response in terms of pain , serum PSA level , and quality of life , as compared with mitoxantrone plus prednisone Background The multi-arm multi-stage ( MAMS ) trial is a new paradigm for conducting r and omised controlled trials that allows the simultaneous assessment of a number of research treatments against a single control arm . MAMS trials provide earlier answers and are potentially more cost-effective than a series of traditionally design ed trials . Prostate cancer is the most common tumour in men and there is a need to improve outcomes for men with hormone-sensitive , advanced disease as quickly as possible . The MAMS design will potentially facilitate evaluation and testing of new therapies in this and other diseases . Methods STAMPEDE is an open-label , 5-stage , 6-arm r and omised controlled trial using MAMS methodology for men with prostate cancer . It is the first trial of this design to use multiple arms and stages synchronously . Results The practical and statistical issues faced by STAMPEDE in implementing MAMS methodology are discussed and contrasted with those for traditional trials . These issues include the choice of intermediate and final outcome measures , sample size calculations and the impact of varying the assumptions , the process for moving between trial stages , stopping accrual to each trial arm and overall , and issues around perceived trial complexity . Conclusion It is possible to use the MAMS design to initiate and undertake large scale cancer trials . The results from STAMPEDE will not be known for some years but the lessons learned from running a MAMS trial are shared in the hope that other research ers will use this exciting and efficient method to perform further r and omised controlled trials . Trial registration IS RCT N78818544 , Background Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone improves survival in men with relapsed prostate cancer . We assessed the effect of this combination in men starting long‐term and rogen‐deprivation therapy ( ADT ) , using a multigroup , multistage trial design . Methods We r and omly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive ADT alone or 
    Output:
    
We did not identify a significant difference in OS between Abi-ADT  and Doce-ADT for men with hormone-naïve high-risk or metastatic PCa , although Bayesian analysis demonstrates a high likelihood that Abi-ADT was preferred .
While these studies did not directly compare these agents , we used method ological techniques to indirectly compare them and found no significant difference in overall survival