***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Flaws in the design , conduct , analysis , and reporting of r and omised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated . The Cochrane Collaboration ’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more The objective of this investigation was to determine the manner by which production st and ards or goals , performance or production feedback and monetary or wage incentive affected or moderated the relationship between worker satisfaction and productivity in a repetitive production task in a fishing industry . The industrial study was conducted to measure worker satisfaction and productivity under various experimental conditions involving production st and ards , performance feedback and monetary incentive . Only the participative st and ard and performance feedback condition affected the worker satisfaction-productivity relationship significantly for the fish-trimming task . The positive correlation coefficient ( 0.87 ) for this condition was found to be highly significant . This has an important implication for setting a strategy for achieving higher worker satisfaction and productivity in such an industry . Production st and ards with feedback generally improved worker satisfaction and productivity . Monetary incentive further improved worker performance but added no incremental satisfaction gain . The incorporation of production st and ards , performance feedback and monetary incentive affected worker satisfaction and productivity differently and this had an effect on the worker satisfaction-productivity relationship . In an earlier laboratory study , no significant worker satisfaction-productivity relationship was found when subjects ( college students ) were provided with similar experimental conditions Background : During the third year general surgery clerkship , medical students are required to develop laparoscopic knot-tying skills . Knot-tying skills studies often rely on objective variables ( e.g. , time , material s used , number of iterations ) that lend themselves to correlational analysis of pre- and post-intervention skill level . This study differs by examining how instructional interventions —role modeling and feedback — affect medical students ' skill acquisition and self-efficacy during a laparoscopic surgical simulation training session . Methods : Seventy-eight surgical clerkship students were assigned r and omly to one cell of a 2X2 factorial design . Participants observed one of two types of role modeling ( expert vs. coping ) and received either process-oriented or outcome -oriented feedback during a 30-min laparoscopic training session . Participants also completed several surveys that assessed their interest in surgery and their self-efficacy for laparoscopic knot tying . Results : Coping model groups tended to perform better on the knot tying task , though this was less the case in the presence of outcome feedback . Expert model groups slightly outperformed the coping model group on the peg transfer task , but in the presence of outcome feedback they reported the lowest satisfaction with their performance and the lowest self-efficacy for the knot tying task . The coping model combined with process feedback had a positive influence on students ' efficiency in learning the task , on their satisfaction with their performance , and on their self-efficacy for laparoscopic knot typing . Conclusions : Results are discussed relative to self-regulated learning theory 
    Output:
    
Conclusions The present study suggest that there is a significant relationship between satisfaction with the outcome of co-production and feedback style and valence .
To satisfy customers , service providers should offer positive feedback .