***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: The aim of this study of the present experiment was to study the marginal periimplant tissues at intentionally non-submerged ( 1-stage implants ) and initially submerged and subsequently exposed implants ( 2-stage implants ) . 5 beagle dogs , about 1-year-old , were used , 3 months after the extraction of the m and ibular premolars , fixtures of the Astra Tech Implants Dental System , the Brånemark System and the Bonefit -- ITI system were installed . In each m and ibular quadrant , 1 fixture of each implant system was installed in a r and omised order . The installation procedure followed the recommendations given in the manuals for each system . Thus , following installation , the bone crest coincided with the fixture margin of the Astra Tech Implants Dental System and the Brånemark System , whereas the border between the plasma sprayed and the machined surface of the Bonefit-ITI implant system was positioned at the level of the bone crest . Following a healing period of 3 months , abutment connection was carried out in the 2-stage systems ( the Astra Tech Implants Dental System and the Brånemark system ) . A 6-month period of plaque control was initiated . The animals were sacrificed and biopsies representing each important region dissected . The tissue sample s were prepared for light microscopy and exposed to histometric and morphometric measurements . The mucosal barrier which formed to the titanium surface following 1-stage and 2-stage implant installations comprised an epithelial and a connective tissue component , which for that 3 systems studied , had similar dimensions and composition . The amount of lamellar bone contained in the periimplant region close to the fixture part of the 3-implant systems was almost identical . It is suggested that correctly performed implant installation may ensure proper conditions for both and hard tissue healing , and that the geometry of the titanium implant seems to be of limited importance OBJECTIVES the aim of this r and omized-controlled clinical trial was to compare the objective and subjective esthetic outcomes of two types of  screwed-retained single-implant crowns .  MATERIAL S AND METHODS participants were r and omly assigned to the test ( all-ceramic ) and control [ porcelain-fused-to-ceramic ( PFM ) ] groups and were seen under investigation at baseline ( B ) , crown insertion ( CI ) , 1-year follow-up ( 1Y ) , and 2-year follow-up ( 2Y ) . Objective parameters were assessed by an intra-oral digital photograph ( 1:1 ratio ) , a study cast , a st and ardized radiograph , periodontal/peri-implant measurements , and question naires were obtained for the subjective parameters . In addition , pink esthetic score ( PES ) and white esthetic score ( WES ) were calculated for both groups . For the subjective evaluation , a visual analogue scale ( VAS ) question naire was used to assess the level of patient satisfaction regarding the esthetic outcome . Then , nine expert clinicians visually inspected and assessed subjective evaluation at the professional level . Statistical analysis was used to compare between groups and investigational appointments . RESULTS twenty patients were included in the study , 10 allocated to the all-ceramic group and 10 to the PFM group . No statistically significant differences were observed for the objective measurements comparing the test and control groups . Minor chipping of the ceramic veneering material was observed in the two patients of control group . The mean difference for all groups comparing objective parameters revealed an increase of papilla height between time points . A slight recession ( 0.26 mm ) of the peri-implant mucosal margin at the implant site was observed between 1Y and 2Y . Mean values for PES and WES were 13.9 and 13.1 for the PFM group and for the all-ceramic group , respectively . These values were not statistically significant . Implant crown volume , outline , translucency , and characterization showed major discrepancies with the contra-lateral natural teeth . As for subjective parameters , VAS patients ' responses regarding their perceptions of the esthetic outcome showed no statistical differences between groups and clinicians ' accuracy scores were 50 % and 47 % for PFM and all-ceramic crowns , respectively . CONCLUSION PFM and all-ceramic single-implant restorations may be indistinguishable from each other regarding the objective /subjective assessment of esthetic integration . The material chosen for fabricating an implant crown per se does not ensure an optimal esthetic outcome if other esthetic parameters are not present AIM This 1-year prospect i ve RCT compared the outcome of minimally ( turned ) and moderately rough ( TiUnite ) implant surfaces . MATERIAL AND METHODS Two subgroups of patients were formed ; one group ( n = 10 ) where all teeth had been extracted due to severe periodontitis , another group ( n = 8) with teeth in the antagonistic jaw with a history of periodontitis and some remaining medium pockets ( 4 - 6 mm ) .  Implants ( n = 85 , 43 turned & 42 TiUnite ) were installed r and omly in each patient . After 3 - 6 months of submerged healing , healing abutments were connected , followed by final abutments 2 weeks later , all with the same surface characteristics as the supporting implant . Peri-implant parameters and intra-oral radiographs were recorded up to 1 year after abutment connection . RESULTS Two turned implants  failed in the partial edentulous group during the initial healing period ( CSR : 95 % ) and none of the TiUnite ( CSR : 100 % ) surface . No statistically significant differences in clinical parameters could be observed between both surfaces . The partial edentulous subgroup showed more bone loss compared to the full edentulous subgroup . CONCLUSION Moderately rough implants have a similar clinical outcome ( at 1 year of loading in periodontitis susceptible patients ) compared to minimally rough implants Patients ’ esthetic expectations are increasing , and the options of the prosthetic pathways are currently evolving . The objective of this r and omized multicenter clinical trial was to assess and compare the esthetic outcome and clinical performance of anterior maxillary all-ceramic implant crowns ( ICs ) based either on prefabricated zirconia abutments veneered with pressed ceramics or on CAD/CAM zirconia abutments veneered with h and buildup technique . The null hypothesis was that there is no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups . Forty implants were inserted in sites 14 to 24 ( FDI ) in 40 patients in 2 centers , the Universities of Bern and Geneva , Switzerl and . After final impression , 20 patients were r and omized into group A , restored with a 1-piece screw-retained single crown made of a prefabricated zirconia abutment with pressed ceramic as the veneering material using the cut-back technique , or group B using an individualized CAD/CAM zirconia abutment ( CARES abutment ; Institut Straumann AG ) with a h and buildup technique . At baseline , 6 mo , and 1 y clinical , esthetic and radiographic parameters were assessed . Group A exhibited 1 dropout patient and 1 failure , result ing in a survival rate of 94.7 % after 1 y , in comparison to 100 % for group B. No other complications occurred . Clinical parameters presented stable and healthy peri-implant soft tissues . Overall , no or only minimal crestal bone changes were observed with a mean DIB ( distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact ) of −0.15 mm ( group A ) and 0.12 mm ( group B ) at 1 y. There were no significant differences at baseline , 6 mo , and 1 y for DIB values between the 2 groups . Pink esthetic score ( PES ) and white esthetic score ( WES ) values at all 3 examinations indicated stability over time for both groups and pleasing esthetic outcomes . Both implant-supported prosthetic pathways represent a valuable treatment option for the restoration of single ICs in the anterior maxilla ( Clinical Trials.gov NCT02905838 ) OBJECTIVES To ( i ) investigate the influence of different extensions of a laser microgrooved abutment zone on connective tissue attachment and ( ii ) assess the impact of a repeated abutment dis-/reconnection on soft- and hard-tissue healing . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Titanium implants were inserted epicrestally in the lower jaws of six dogs . Healing abutments with either partially ( LP ) or completely ( LC ) laser microgrooved margins or machined surface margins ( M ) were r and omly allocated either to a single (1 × )/repeated ( 2 × ) dis-/reconnection at 4 and 6 weeks ( test ) , respectively , or left undisturbed ( control ) . At 6 and 8 weeks , histomorphometrical ( e.g. most coronal level of bone in contact with the implant [ CBI ] , subepithelial connective tissue attachment [ STC ] ) and immunohistochemical ( Collagen Type-I [ CI ] ) parameters were assessed . RESULTS At control sites , LP/LC groups revealed lower mean CBL ( 8 weeks , 0.95 ± 0.51 vs. 0.54 ± 0.63 vs. 1.66 ± 1.26 mm ) , higher mean STC ( 8 weeks , 82.58 ± 24.32 % vs. 96.37 ± 5.12 % vs. 54.17 ± 8.09 % ) , but comparable CI antigen reactivity . A repeated abutment manipulation was associated with increased mean CBL ( 8 weeks , 1.53 ± 1.09 vs. 0.94 ± 0.17 vs. 1.06 ± 0.34 mm ) , decreased STC ( 8 weeks , 57.34 ± 43.06 % vs. 13.26 ± 19.04 % vs. 37.76 ± 37.08 % ) and CI values . CONCLUSIONS It was concluded that ( i ) LC > LP abutments enhanced subepithelial connective tissue attachment and preserved crestal bone levels , ( ii ) repeated abutment dis-/reconnection during the initial healing phase ( 4 - 6 weeks ) may be associated with increased soft- and hard-tissue changes and ( iii ) LP and LC should be considered using a one abutment , one time approach OBJECTIVES To test the survival rates , and the technical and biological complication rates of customized zirconia and titanium abutments 5 years after crown insertion . MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-two patients with 40 single implants in maxillary and m and ibular canine and posterior regions were included . The implant sites were r and omly assigned to zirconia abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns or titanium abutments supporting metal-ceramic crowns . Clinical examinations were performed at baseline , and at 6 , 12 , 36 and 60 months of follow-up . The abutments and reconstructions were examined for technical and /or biological complications . Probing pocket depth ( PPD ) , plaque control record ( PCR ) and Bleeding on Probing ( BOP ) were assessed at abutments ( test ) and analogous contralateral teeth ( control ) . Radiographs of the implants revealed the bone level ( BL ) on mesial ( mBL ) and distal sides ( dBL ) . Data were statistically analyzed with nonparametric mixed models provided by Brunner and Langer and STATA ( P < 0.05 ) . RESULTS Eighteen patients with 18 zirconia and 10 titanium abutments were available at a mean follow-up of 5.6 years ( range 4.5 - 6.3 years ) . No abutment fracture or loss of a reconstruction occurred . Hence , the survival rate was 100 % for both . Survival of implants supporting zirconia abutments was 88.9 % and 90 % for implants supporting titanium abutments . Chipping of the veneering ceramic occurred at three metal-ceramic crowns supported by titanium abutments . No significant differences were found at the zirconia and titanium abutments for PPD ( meanPPDZrO2 3.3 ± 0.6 mm , mPPDTi 3.6 ± 1.1 mm ) , PCR ( mPCRZrO2 0.1 ± 0.3 , mPCRTi 0.3 ± 0.2 ) and BOP ( mBOPZrO2 0.5 ± 0.3 , mBOPTi 0.6 ± 0.3 ) . Moreover , the BL was similar at implants supporting zirconia and titanium abutments ( mBLZrO2 1.8 ± 0.5 , dBLZrO2 2.0 ± 0.8 ; mBLTi 2.0 ± 0.8 , dBLTi 1.9 ± 0.8 ) . CONCLUSIONS There were no statistically or clinical ly relevant differences between the 5-year survival rates , and the technical and biological complication rates  of zirconia and titanium abutments in posterior regions PURPOSE This is a 2-year report from an ongoing prospect i ve 5-year multicenter study . The aim of the study was to evaluate the short- and long-term clinical function of CerAdapt ceramic abutments supporting short-span fixed partial dentures ( FPD ) . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Initially , 105 Brånemark System implants were placed in a total of 32 patients at 3 different clinics . After initial healing 103 implants remained . For the support of 36 FPDs , 53 ceramic and 50 titanium abutments were connected , 19 on ceramic and  
    Output:
    
The macroscopic design , the surface topography and the manipulation of the implant abutment did not have a significant influence on peri-implant inflammation .
In contrast , the abutment material demonstrated increased BOP values over time for Ti when compared to Zi abutments