***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background : Some individuals with moderate/severe persistent asthma develop irreversible airway obstruction . These individuals present with dyspnoea , exercise intolerance and impaired quality of life ( QOL ) , all of which could potentially be alleviated with exercise training . Objective : To investigate whether exercise training improves functional exercise capacity and QOL in middle-aged and older adults with fixed airway obstruction asthma ( FAOA ) . Methods : 35 subjects aged 67.8 ± 10.6 years , with FEV1 59 ± 16 % of predicted , were r and omised to a 6-week  ‘ intervention ’ period of supervised exercise training ( n = 20 ) or usual care ( n = 15 ) . This period was preceded by a 3-week run-in period during which asthma control was assessed weekly . Functional exercise capacity ( 6-min walk distance , 6MWD ) and QOL ( Asthma QOL Question naire , AQLQ ) were measured before , immediately following and 3 months after the intervention period . Results : 34 subjects ( exercise group , n = 19 , and control group , n = 15 ) completed the intervention period . Relative to the control group , the exercise group had greater improvements immediately following and 3 months after the intervention in the AQLQ symptom domain ( 0.61 , p = 0.001 , and 0.57 points per item , p = 0.005 ) and AQLQ activity limitation domain ( 0.43 , p = 0.04 , and 0.55 points per item , p = 0.04 ) . 6MWD increased ( 36 ± 37 m , p < 0.01 ) in the exercise group immediately following training and remained elevated ( 34 ± 45 m , p < 0.01 ) at the 3-month follow-up . The magnitude of change in 6MWD between groups was not significant , despite no change in the control group . Conclusions : Supervised exercise training improves symptoms and QOL in adults with FAOA BACKGROUND Aerobic training has a number of well known beneficial effects in both normal and asthmatic children . However , the impact of training on the clinical management of the underlying bronchial asthma remains controversial , particularly in the most severe patients . METHODS Clinical evaluation , spirometric tests , symptom limited maximum exercise testing , and exercise challenge tests were performed in a group of children with stable moderate to severe asthma . Forty two patients ( 24 boys ) aged 8–16 were evaluated twice : before and after supervised aerobic training ( group 1 , n = 26 ) and two months apart ( untrained group 2 , n = 16 ) . RESULTS Spirometric and maximal exercise variables in the initial evaluation were significantly reduced in group 1 ( p<0.05 ) but medication and clinical scores and the occurrence of exercise induced bronchospasm ( EIB ) did not differ between the two groups . Aerobic improvement with training ( maximal oxygen uptake and /or anaerobic threshold increment > 10 % and 100 ml ) was inversely related to the baseline level of fitness and was independent of disease severity . Although the clinical score and the occurrence of EIB did not change after training , aerobic improvement was associated with a significant reduction in the medication score and the daily use of both inhaled and oral steroids ( p<0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS Aerobic improvement with training in less fit asthmatic children is related to a short term decrease in the daily use of inhaled and oral steroids , independent of the severity of the disease Background . Supervised exercise leads to significant improvements in asthma control and quality -of-life in adults with partly controlled asthma ; however , the role of unsupervised exercise is unknown . Methods . The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of self-directed exercise on subjective and objective indices of asthma-related health .  Participants ( n = 24 ) were assigned to an exercise group or a control group for a 12-week period . Those in the exercise group were provided with exercise programs by a qualified exercise professional . These programs were up date d through electronic mail every 3 weeks to ensure progression . Controls maintained their current lifestyle habits for the intervention period . Assessment s of aerobic fitness , lung function , and subjective and objective asthma measures were conducted at baseline and after completion of the 12-week intervention period for both groups . Analysis of covariance was used to detect differences between groups from baseline to week 12 . Qualitative analyses were used to assess responses to open-ended questions . Results . Adherence to the program was poor . Perceived asthma control and self-reported frequency and severity of asthma improved significantly in the exercise group at week 12 compared with that in the control group . Objective measures of asthma such as asthma control , quality -of-life , and lung function , as well as peak and submaximal aerobic fitness did not change relative to controls . Responses to open-ended questions revealed improvements in three areas : asthma management , perceived fitness , and well-being . Conclusion . Adults with partly controlled asthma are able to improve perceived control and subjective measures of asthma-related health with 12 weeks of self-directed exercise ; however , supervision may be required to make significant improvements to measured asthma control , quality of life , and aerobic fitness . Future research should focus on the means to improve adherence of self-directed exercise programs  in this population The effect of two types of physical training on patients with perennial asthma were compared in a blind , controlled , r and omized study . Eleven of 27 adults with asthma performed a physical training programme which did not change their oxygen consumption ( control group ) . The remaining 16 asthmatics performed a physical training programme which improved their maximal oxygen consumption ( training group ) . Both of the training programmes were performed for 1 hour , twice a week during a period of 2 months . No complications were reported during the performance of the training programmes . The doses of all medicines apart from beta 2-agonist aerosol were unchanged during the training period . The patients inhaled beta 2-agonist aerosol if their peak expiratory flow ( PEF ) was less than 60 % of their maximal PEF . The training group decreased their use of aerosol from an average of 4.94 puffs per day to 3.41 puffs per day ( P less than 0.05 ) . The control group did not change their use of beta 2-agonist aerosol significantly . It is concluded that physical exercise which improves the maximal oxygen consumption decreases the use of beta 2-agonist spray and that heavy exercise is well tolerated by asthmatics The present multicentre study evaluates the differences in efficacy between a 3 month rehabilitation programme including drug treatment , and a 3 month control period of drug treatment only , for asthmatic patients and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD ) . The programme was run by physiotherapists in eight local practice s , and included exercise training , patient education , breathing retraining , evacuation of mucus , relaxation techniques , and recreational activities . In a r and omized controlled trial with a cross-over design , the effects of rehabilitation were evaluated 3 and 6 months after baseline measurements in terms of exercise tolerance and quality of life ( QOL ) . Exercise tolerance was assessed using submaximal cycle ergometer tests and 6 min walking tests .  QOL was evaluated by means of the Chronic Respiratory Disease Question naire ( CRDQ ) . After 3 months , the patients who started with rehabilitation showed significant improvements in endurance time ( 421 s ) and cardiac frequency ( 6 beats.min-1 ) during cycling , walking distance ( 39 m ) , and total CRDQ score ( 17 points ) compared to the control group . These improvements were still significant after 6 months . Additional analysis indicated that the asthmatic patients and the patients with COPD responded to rehabilitation in a similar way , with the exception that there was a greater improvement in walking distance for asthmatics . Improvements in exercise tolerance were not significantly correlated with improvements in QOL .  Rehabilitation of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in local physiotherapy practice s improves exercise tolerance and quality of life The effects of a 3-month physical training programme on airway inflammation and clinical outcomes were studied in school-aged children with asthma . Subjects with persistent allergic asthma ( aged 12.7±3.4 yrs ; n = 34 ) were r and omly allocated into training and control groups . Exercise consisted of twice-weekly 50-min sessions for 12 weeks . Inflammation was assessed by levels of exhaled nitric oxide , blood eosinophils , eosinophil cationic protein , C-reactive protein , and total and mite-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E. Lung volumes and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine were determined . The Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Question naire and Paediatric Asthma Caregiver 's Quality of Life Question naire were used to evaluate activity restrictions , symptoms and emotional stress . The efficacy of the training was assessed by accelerometry . Following the programme , the exercise group spent twice as much time as the controls undertaking moderate-to-vigorous activities . No differences in changes were seen between groups for asthma outcomes . However , total IgE decreased more in the exercise group , as did mite-specific IgE. Training did not increase inflammation in children with persistent asthma , and may have decreased both total and allergen-specific immunoglobulin E levels . It is concluded that there is no reason to discourage asthmatic children with controlled disease to exercise Fitness improvement was used to compare morning with afternoon exercise periods for asthmatic children . Children with persistent moderate asthma ( according to GINA criteria ) , 8 to 11 years old , were divided into 3 groups : morning training group ( N = 23 ) , afternoon training group ( N = 23 ) , and non-training group ( N = 23 ) . The program was based on twice a week 90-min sessions for 4 months . We measured the 9-min running distance , resting heart rate and abdominal muscle strength ( sit-up number ) before and after the training . All children took budesonide , 400 microg/day , and an on dem and inhaled ss-agonist . The distance covered in 9 min increased ( mean + /- SEM ) from 1344 + /- 30 m by 248 + /- 30 m for the morning group , from 1327 + /- 30 m by 162 + /- 20 m for the afternoon group , and from 1310 + /- 20 m by 2 + /- 20 m for the control group ( P < 0.05 for the comparison of morning and afternoon groups with the control group by ANOVA and P > 0.05 for morning with afternoon comparison ) . The reduction of resting heart rate from 83 + /- 1 , 85 + /- 2 and 86 + /- 1 bpm was 5.1 + /- 0.8 bpm in the morning group , 4.4 + /- 0.8 bpm in the afternoon group , and -0.2 + /- 0.7 bpm in the control group ( P > 0.05 for morning with afternoon comparison and P < 0.05 versus control ) . The number of sit-ups in the morning , afternoon and control groups increased from 22.0 + /- 1.7 , 24.3 + /- 1.4 and 23 + /- 1.1 sit-ups by 9.8 + /- 0.9 , 7.7 + /- 1.4 , and 1.9 + /- 0.7 sit-ups , respectively ( P > 0.05 for morning with afternoon comparison and P < 0.05 versus control ) . No statistically significant differences were detected between the morning and afternoon groups in terms of physical training of asthmatic children OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of a training protocol on aerobic and anaerobic fitness in children with asthma . STUDY DESIGN Sixteen boys ( mean age : 13 years ; range : 10 - 16 years ) with mild-to-moderate asthma participated in a rehabilitation program that included 6 weeks of individualized training on a cycle ergometer . Two groups were r and omly formed : the control group ( CG , n = 7 ) and the training group ( TG , n = 9 ) , which exercised at an intensity set at the heart rate corresponding to the ventilatory threshold , with 1-minute sprints against the maximal aerobic power ( MAP ) every 4 minutes . Session duration was 45 minutes , 3 sessions per week . Changes in maximal oxygen uptake ( VO(2)max ) , MAP , short-term peak power ( PP ) , and pulmonary function were assessed . RESULTS Two patients of the training group did not complete the study . Pulmonary function remained unchanged in both groups . Improvement in both aerobic and anaerobic fitness was significant only in the training group ( TG vs CG ) : VO(2)max + 18 % + /- 2.1 % versus + 9 % + /- 4.5 % ( P < .05 ) , MAP + 32 % + /- 5 % versus 12 % + /- 7 % ( P < .05 ) , PP + 21 % + /- 5.7 % versus + 8.8 % + /- 10 % ( P < .01 ) . CONCLUSION Exercise training with high-intensity bouts is well tolerated in children with mild-to-moderate asthma . When included in a global rehabilitation program , this type of training improves both aerobic and anaerobic fitness . Anaerobic activities should be considered in sports rehabilitation programs for children with asthma Twenty-six adults ( 23 to 58 years ) with mild to moderate asthma underwent a 10-week supervised rehabilitation program , with emphasis on physical training . In the first 2 weeks , they exercised daily in an indoor 
    Output:
    
Physical training was well tolerated with no adverse effects reported .
None of the studies mentioned worsening of asthma symptoms following physical training .
This review demonstrated that physical training can improve cardiopulmonary fitness and was well tolerated among people with asthma in the included studies .