***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of fluid resuscitation as guided by lactate clearance rate ( LCR ) and central venous oxygen saturation ( ScvO2 ) in patients with sepsis . METHODS A prospect i ve r and omized control study was conducted . Fifty patients diagnosed with severe sepsis or septic shock from January 2011 to February 2012 in department of critical care medicine of Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were enrolled in the study . The patients were r and omly divided into two groups according to the sequence ( each n=25 ) : ScvO2 group and LCR group . After ICU admission , the patients were treated symptomatically timely , and fluid resuscitation was started as early as possible according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidance for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 2008 . Central venous pressure (CVP)≥8 mm Hg ( 1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa ) , mean arterial pressure (MAP)≥65 mm Hg and ScvO2≥0.70 served as goal values to accomplish the fluid resuscitation therapy in ScvO2 group , while CVP≥8 mm Hg , MAP≥65 mm Hg , LCR≥10 % served as goal value to accomplish the fluid resuscitation therapy in LCR group . The general condition and clinical characteristics on arrival in ICU , changes in CVP , MAP , ScvO2 , lactate level and /or LCR before ( 0 hour ) and 3 , 6 , 72 hours after the start of fluid resuscitation and the other related conditions during the therapy were recorded . RESULTS There was no significant difference in general data or clinical characteristics before the start of therapy , occurrence of organ dysfunction , or treatment measures during different time periods after start of fluid resuscitation . Compared with the condition immediately before fluid resuscitation , at 3 hours after start of fluid resuscitation , CVP were improved in LCR and ScvO2 groups ( 8.58±1.17 mm Hg vs. 6.33±1.21 mm Hg , 9.08±2.43 mm Hg vs. 5.33±0.98 mm Hg , both P<0.05 ) ; at 6 hours after start of fluid resuscitation , heart rate ( HR ) and respiratory rate ( RR ) were lowered in LCR and ScvO2 groups ( HR : 96±18 bpm vs. 127±13 bpm , 98±13 bpm vs. 116±19 bpm , RR : 23±3 times/min vs. 33±9 times/min , 24±5 times/min vs. 35±6 times/min , all P<0.05 ) , oxygenation index ( PaO2/FiO2 ) was increased in LCR and ScvO2 groups ( 179±41 mm Hg vs. 86±21 mm Hg , 202±33 mm Hg vs. 95±17 mm Hg , both P<0.05 ) , and there was no significant difference in MAP in both groups . There was no significant difference in all indexes between two groups . In LCR group , 3 hours after start of fluid resuscitation , lactate level was significantly decreased ( 2.81±0.18 mmol/L vs. 3.43±1.31 mmol/L , P<0.05 ) . Compared with the value 3 hours after start of fluid resuscitation , LCR was significantly improved at 6 hours and 72 hours after start of fluid resuscitation in LCR group [ (42.69±8.75)% , (48.87±9.69)% vs. (20.32±4.58)% , both P<0.05 ] . Compared with that immediately before fluid resuscitation , ScvO2 was significant improved in ScvO2 group at 3 hours after start of fluid resuscitation ( 0.65±0.04 vs. 0.53±0.06 , P<0.05 ) . There was no significant difference in success rate of fluid resuscitation comparing that of 6 hours and that of 72 hours [ 6 hours : 72 % ( 18/25 ) vs. 64 % ( 16/25 ) , χ(2)=0.368 , P=0.762 ; 72 hours : 88 % ( 22/25 ) vs. 88 % ( 22/25 ) , χ(2)=0.000 , P=1.000 ] , length of ICU stay ( 8±3 days vs. 10±4 days , t=0.533 , P=0.874 ) , length of hospital stay ( 29±11 days vs. 35±16 days , t=0.692 , P=0.531 ) , improvement rate [ 84 % ( 21/25 ) vs. 76%(19/25 ) , χ(2)=0.500 , P=0.480 ] or 28-day mortality [ 20 % ( 5/25 ) vs. 28 % ( 7/25 ) , χ(2)=0.439 , P=0.742 ] between LCR and ScvO2 groups . CONCLUSIONS Both LCR and ScvO2 can be taken as the index in confirming the endpoint of fluid resuscitation for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock . Fluid resuscitation therapy under the guidance of LCR is accurate and reliable in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock BACKGROUND In a single-center study published more than a decade ago involving patients presenting to the emergency department with severe sepsis and septic shock , mortality was markedly lower among those who were treated according to a 6-hour protocol of early goal -directed therapy ( EGDT )  , in which intravenous fluids , vasopressors , inotropes , and blood transfusions were adjusted to reach central hemodynamic targets , than among those receiving usual care . We conducted a trial to determine whether these findings were generalizable and whether all aspects of the protocol were necessary . METHODS In 31 emergency departments in the United States , we r and omly assigned patients with septic shock to one of three groups for 6 hours of resuscitation : protocol -based EGDT ; protocol -based st and ard therapy that did not require the placement of a central venous catheter , administration of inotropes , or blood transfusions ; or usual care . The primary end point was 60-day in-hospital mortality . We tested sequentially whether protocol -based care ( EGDT and st and ard-therapy groups combined ) was superior to usual care and whether protocol -based EGDT was superior to protocol -based st and ard therapy . Secondary outcomes included longer-term mortality and the need for organ support . RESULTS We enrolled 1341 patients , of whom 439 were r and omly assigned to protocol -based EGDT , 446 to protocol -based st and ard therapy , and 456 to usual care .  Resuscitation strategies differed significantly with respect to the monitoring of central venous pressure and oxygen and the use of intravenous fluids , vasopressors , inotropes , and blood transfusions . By 60 days , there were 92 deaths in the protocol -based EGDT group ( 21.0 % ) , 81 in the protocol -based st and ard-therapy group ( 18.2 % ) , and 86 in the usual-care group ( 18.9 % ) ( relative risk with protocol -based therapy vs. usual care , 1.04 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.82 to 1.31 ; P=0.83 ; relative risk with protocol -based EGDT vs. protocol -based st and ard therapy , 1.15 ; 95 % CI , 0.88 to 1.51 ; P=0.31 ) . There were no significant differences in 90-day mortality , 1-year mortality , or the need for organ support . CONCLUSIONS In a multicenter trial conducted in the tertiary care setting , protocol -based resuscitation of patients in whom septic shock was diagnosed in the emergency department did not improve outcomes . ( Funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences ; ProCESS Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00510835 . ) BACKGROUND Early goal -directed therapy ( EGDT ) has been endorsed in the guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign as a key strategy to decrease mortality among patients presenting to the emergency department with septic shock . However , its effectiveness is uncertain . METHODS In this trial conducted at 51 centers ( mostly in Australia or New Zeal and ) , we r and omly assigned patients presenting to the emergency department with early septic shock to receive either EGDT or usual care . The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days after r and omization . RESULTS Of the 1600 enrolled patients , 796 were assigned to the EGDT group and 804 to the usual-care group . Primary outcome data were available for more than 99 % of the patients . Patients in the EGDT group received a larger mean ( ±SD ) volume of intravenous fluids in the first 6 hours after r and omization than did those in the usual-care group ( 1964±1415 ml vs. 1713±1401 ml ) and were more likely to receive vasopressor infusions ( 66.6 % vs. 57.8 % ) , red-cell transfusions ( 13.6 % vs. 7.0 % ) , and dobutamine ( 15.4 % vs. 2.6 % ) ( P<0.001 for all comparisons ) . At 90 days after r and omization , 147 deaths had occurred in the EGDT group and 150 had occurred in the usual-care group , for rates of death of 18.6 % and 18.8 % , respectively ( absolute risk difference with EGDT vs. usual care , -0.3 percentage points ; 95 % confidence interval , -4.1 to 3.6 ; P=0.90 ) . There was no significant difference in survival time , in-hospital mortality , duration of organ support , or length of hospital stay . CONCLUSIONS In critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department with early septic shock , EGDT did not reduce all-cause mortality at 90 days . ( Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Alfred Foundation ; ARISE Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00975793 . ) CONTEXT Goal -directed resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock has been reported to reduce mortality when applied in the emergency department . OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis of noninferiority between lactate clearance and central venous oxygen saturation ( ScvO2 ) as goals of early sepsis resuscitation . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PATIENTS Multicenter r and omized , noninferiority trial involving patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion or septic shock who were admitted to the emergency department from January 2007 to January 2009 at 1 of 3 participating US urban hospitals . INTERVENTIONS We r and omly assigned patients to 1 of 2 resuscitation protocol s. The ScvO2 group was resuscitated to normalize central venous pressure , mean arterial pressure , and ScvO2 of at least 70 % ; and the lactate clearance group was resuscitated to normalize central venous pressure , mean arterial pressure , and lactate clearance of at least 10 % . The study protocol was continued until all goals were achieved or for up to 6 hours . Clinicians who subsequently assumed the care of the patients were blinded to the treatment assignment . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome was absolute in-hospital mortality rate ; the noninferiority threshold was set at Delta equal to -10 % . RESULTS Of the 300 patients enrolled , 150 were assigned to each group and patients were well matched by demographic , comorbidities , and physiological features . There were no differences in treatments administered during the initial 72 hours of hospitalization . Thirty-four patients ( 23 % ) in the ScvO2 group died while in the hospital ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 17%-30 % ) compared with 25 ( 17 % ; 95 % CI , 11%-24 % ) in the lactate clearance group . This observed difference between mortality rates did not reach the predefined -10 % threshold ( intent-to-treat analysis : 95 % CI for the 6 % difference , -3 % to 15 % ) . There were no differences in treatment-related adverse events between the groups . CONCLUSION Among patients with septic shock who were treated to normalize central venous and mean arterial pressure , additional management to normalize lactate clearance compared with management to normalize ScvO2 did not result in significantly different in-hospital mortality . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00372502 BACKGROUND Early , goal -directed therapy ( EGDT ) is recommended in international guidelines for the resuscitation of patients presenting with early septic shock . However , adoption has been limited , and uncertainty about its effectiveness remains . METHODS We conducted a pragmatic r and omized trial with an integrated cost-effectiveness analysis in 56 hospitals in Engl and . Patients were r and omly assigned to receive either EGDT ( a 6-hour resuscitation protocol ) or usual care . The primary clinical outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days . RESULTS We enrolled 1260 patients , with 630 assigned to EGDT and 630 to usual care . By 90 days , 184 of 623 patients ( 29.5 % ) in the EGDT group and 1 
    Output:
    
Conclusion EGDT is not superior to usual care for ED patients with septic shock but is associated with increased utilisation of ICU re sources