***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate with methotrexate alone in methotrexate-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis ( PsA ) . Methods In this open-label study , patients 18 years and older with active PsA who were naive to methotrexate and not receiving disease-modifying therapy ( N=115 ) were r and omly assigned ( 1:1 ) to receive either infliximab ( 5 mg/kg ) at weeks 0 , 2 , 6 and 14 plus methotrexate ( 15 mg/week ) ; or methotrexate ( 15 mg/week ) alone . The primary assessment was American College of Rheumatology ( ACR ) 20 response at week 16 . Secondary outcome measures included psoriasis area and severity index ( PASI ) , disease activity score in 28 joints ( DAS28 ) and dactylitis and enthesitis assessment s. Results At week 16 , 86.3 % of patients receiving infliximab plus methotrexate and 66.7 % of those receiving methotrexate alone achieved an ACR20 response ( p<0.02 ) . Of patients whose baseline PASI was 2.5 or greater , 97.1 % receiving infliximab plus methotrexate compared with 54.3 % receiving methotrexate alone experienced a 75 % or greater improvement in PASI ( p<0.0001 ) . Improvements in C-reactive protein levels , DAS28 response and remission rates , dactylitis , fatigue and morning stiffness duration were also significantly greater in the group receiving infliximab . In the infliximab plus methotrexate group , 46 % ( 26/57 ) had treatment-related adverse events ( AE ) and two patients had serious AE , compared with 24 % with AE ( 13/54 ) and no serious AE in the methotrexate-alone group . Conclusions Treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in methotrexate-naive patients with active PsA demonstrated significantly greater ACR20 response rates and PASI75 improvement compared with methotrexate alone and was generally well tolerated . This trial is registered in the US National Institutes of Health clinical trials.gov data base , identifier NCT00367237 BACKGROUND Not all patients with rheumatoid arthritis can tolerate or respond to methotrexate , a st and ard treatment for this disease . There is evidence that antitumour necrosis factor alpha ( TNFalpha ) is efficacious in relief of signs and symptoms . We therefore investigated whether infliximab , a chimeric human-mouse anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody would provide additional clinical benefit to patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis despite receiving methotrexate .  METHODS In an international double-blind placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial , 428 patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis , who had received continuous methotrexate for at least 3 months and at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks , were r and omised to placebo ( n=88 ) or one of four regimens of  infliximab  at weeks 0 , 2 , and 6 . Additional infusions of the same dose were given every 4 or 8 weeks thereafter on a background of a stable dose of methotrexate ( median 15 mg/week for > or = 6 months , range 10 - 35 mg/wk ) . Patients were assessed every 4 weeks for 30 weeks . FINDINGS At 30 weeks , the American College of Rheumatology ( 20 ) response criteria , representing a 20 % improvement from baseline , were achieved in 53 , 50 , 58 , and 52 % of patients receiving 3 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks , respectively , compared with 20 % of patients receiving placebo plus methotrexate ( p<0.001 for each of the four infliximab regimens vs placebo ) . A 50 % improvement was achieved in 29 , 27 , 26 , and 31 % of infliximab plus methotrexate in the same treatment groups , compared with 5 % of patients on placebo plus methotrexate ( p<0.001 ) . Infliximab was well-tolerated ; withdrawals for adverse events as well as the occurrence of serious adverse events or serious infections did not exceed those in the placebo group . INTERPRETATION During 30 weeks , treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate was more efficacious than methotrexate alone in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis not previously responding to methotrexate OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and efficacy of golimumab in methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) . METHODS MTX-naive patients with RA ( n = 637 ) were r and omized to receive placebo plus MTX ( group 1 ) , golimumab 100 mg plus placebo ( group 2 ) , golimumab 50 mg plus MTX ( group 3 ) , or golimumab 100 mg plus MTX ( group 4 ) . Subcutaneous injections of golimumab or placebo were administered every 4 weeks . The dosage of MTX/placebo capsules started at 10 mg/week and escalated to 20 mg/week . The primary end point , the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % improvement criteria ( achieving an ACR50 response ) at week 24 , required significant differences between groups 3 and 4 combined ( combined group ) versus group 1 and significant differences in a pairwise comparison ( group 3 or group 4 versus group 1 ) . RESULTS An intent-to-treat ( ITT ) analysis of the ACR50 response at week 24 did not show a significant difference between the combined group and group 1 ( 38.4 % and 29.4 % , respectively ; P=0.053 ) , while a post hoc modified ITT analysis ( excluding 3 untreated patients ) of the ACR50 response showed statistically significant differences between the combined group and group 1 ( 38.5 % versus 29.4 % ; P=0.049 ) and between group 3 ( 40.5 % ; P=0.038 ) but not group 4 ( 36.5 % ; P=0.177 ) and group 1 . Group 2 was noninferior to group 1 for the ACR50 response at week 24 ( 33.1 % ; 95 % confidence interval lower bound -5.2 % ; predefined delta value for noninferiority -10 % ) . The combination of golimumab plus MTX demonstrated a significantly better response compared with placebo plus MTX in most other efficacy parameters , including response/remission according to the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints . Serious adverse events occurred in 7 % , 3 % , 6 % , and 6 % of patients in groups 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 , respectively . CONCLUSION Although the primary end point was not met , the modified ITT analysis of the primary end point and other prespecified efficacy measures demonstrated that the efficacy of golimumab plus MTX is better than , and the efficacy of golimumab alone is similar to , the efficacy of MTX alone in reducing RA signs and symptoms in MTX-naive patients , with no unexpected safety concerns Background : Certolizumab pegol is a PEGylated tumour necrosis factor inhibitor . Objective : To evaluate the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol versus placebo , plus methotrexate ( MTX ) , in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) . Methods : An international , multicentre , phase 3 , r and omised , double-blind , placebo-controlled study in active adult-onset RA . Patients ( n = 619 ) were r and omised 2:2:1 to subcutaneous certolizumab pegol ( liquid formulation ) 400 mg at weeks 0 , 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg or 400 mg plus MTX , or placebo plus MTX , every 2 weeks for 24 weeks . The primary end point was ACR20 response at week 24 . Secondary end points included ACR50 and ACR70 responses , change from baseline in modified Total Sharp Score , ACR core set variables and physical function . Results : Significantly more patients in the certolizumab pegol 200 mg and 400 mg groups achieved an ACR20 response  versus placebo ( p⩽0.001 ) ; rates were 57.3 % , 57.6 % and 8.7 % , respectively . Certolizumab pegol 200 and 400 mg also significantly inhibited radiographic progression ; mean changes from baseline in mTSS at week 24 were 0.2 and −0.4 , respectively , versus 1.2 for placebo ( rank analysis p⩽0.01 ) . Certolizumab pegol-treated patients reported rapid and significant improvements in physical function  versus placebo ; mean changes from baseline in HAQ-DI at week 24 were −0.50 and −0.50 , respectively , versus −0.14 for placebo ( p⩽0.001 ) . Most adverse events were mild or moderate , with low incidence of withdrawals due to adverse events . Five patients developed tuberculosis . Conclusion : Certolizumab pegol plus MTX was more efficacious than placebo plus MTX , rapidly and significantly improving signs and symptoms of RA and physical function and inhibiting radiographic progression . Trial registration number : Introduction The efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis have been evaluated in a comprehensive phase 3 program . Patients from these r and omized trials could receive tocilizumab treatment in open-label extension trials . Here , the long-term safety profile of tocilizumab , using pooled data from all of these trials , is reported . Methods Cumulative safety data ( as of February 6 , 2009 ) from five core phase 3 trials , two ongoing extension trials , and one clinical pharmacology study were analyzed . Two patient population s were evaluated : an all-control population ( n = 4,199 ) , which included all patients r and omly assigned in the placebo-controlled portions of the five core studies , and an all-exposed population ( n = 4,009 ) , which included patients from any of the eight studies who received at least one dose of tocilizumab .  Results Total exposure to tocilizumab was 8,580 patient years ( PY ) , and total duration of observation was 9,414 PY . Overall adverse event ( AE ) and serious AE ( SAE ) rates were 278.2/100 PY and 14.4/100 PY , respectively . These events included serious infections ( 4.7/100 PY ) , opportunistic infections ( 0.23/100 PY ) , gastrointestinal perforations ( 0.28/100 PY ) , malignancy ( 1.1/100 PY ) , myocardial infa rct ion ( 0.25/100 PY ) , and stroke ( 0.19/100 PY ) . The rates of SAEs and serious infections were stable over time ; no increase with prolonged exposure was noted . Conclusions The longer-term safety profile of tocilizumab ( mean treatment duration , 2.4 years ) is consistent with that observed in the phase 3 studies ( duration up to 1 year ) Objective : To determine the efficacy and safety of etanercept and etanercept plus sulfasalazine versus sulfasalazine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) despite sulfasalazine therapy . Methods : Patients were r and omly assigned to etanercept ( 25 mg twice weekly ; sulfasalazine was discontinued at baseline ) , etanercept plus sulfasalazine ( unchanged regimen of 2–3 g/day ) or sulfasalazine in a double-blind , r and omised , 2-year study in adult patients with active RA despite sulfasalazine therapy .  Efficacy was assessed using the American College of Rheumatology criteria , disease activity scores ( DAS ) and patient-reported outcomes ( PRO ) . Results : Demographic variables and baseline disease characteristics were comparable among treatment groups ; mean DAS 5.1 , 5.2 and 5.1 for etanercept ( n = 103 ) , etanercept plus sulfasalazine ( n = 101 ) and sulfasalazine ( n = 50 ) , respectively . Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy was highest with sulfasalazine ( 26 ( 52 % ) vs 6 ( 6 % ) for either etanercept group , p<0.001 ) . Patients receiving etanercept or etanercept plus sulfasalazine had a more rapid initial response , which was sustained at 2 years , than those receiving sulfasalazine : mean DAS 2.8 , 2.5 versus 4.5 , respectively ( p<0.05 ) ; ACR 20 response was achieved by 67 % , 77 % versus 34 % of patients , respectively ( p<0.01 ) Overall , PRO followed a similar pattern ; a clinical ly significant improvement in health assessment question naire was achieved by 76 % , 78 % versus 40 % of patients , respectively ( p<0.01 ) . Commonly reported adverse events occurring in the et 
    Output:
    
The IR of TB was higher in high- background TB areas .
RCTs are not sensitive enough to assess the risk of reactivation of latent TB infection ( LTBI ) .
Disease , treatment and background TB rate are associated with different frequencies of active TB .