***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: We present a double-blind trial in which a pulsed infrared beam was compared with a placebo in the treatment of myofascial pain in the cervical region . The patients were su bmi tted to 12 sessions on alternate days to a total energy dose of 5 J each . At each session , the four most painful muscular trigger points and five bilateral homometameric acupuncture points were irradiated . Those in the placebo group su bmi tted to the same number of sessions following an identical procedure , the only difference being that the laser apparatus was nonoperational . Pain was monitored using the Italian version of the McGill pain question naire and the Scott-Huskisson visual analogue scale . The results show a pain attenuation in the treated group and a statistically significant difference between the two groups of patients , both at the end of therapy and at the 3-month follow-up examination OBJECTIVE We aim ed to evaluate the effectiveness of laser therapy in myofascial pain syndrome treatment . BACKGROUND DATA Myofascial pain syndrome is a disease that is characterized by hypersensitive points called trigger points found in one or more muscles and /or connective tissues . It can cause pain , muscle spasm , sensitivity , stiffness , weakness , limitation of range of motion and rarely autonomic dysfunction . Physical therapy modalities and exercise are used in the treatment of this frequently encountered disease . METHODS The placebo controlled , prospect i ve , long-term follow up study was planned with 60 patients who had trigger points in their upper trapezius muscles . The patients were divided into three groups r and omly . Stretching exercises were taught to each group and they were asked to exercise at home . Treatment duration was 4 weeks . Placebo laser was applied to group 1 , dry needling to group 2 and laser to group 3 . He-Ne laser was applied to three trigger points in the upper trapezius muscles on both sides with 632.8 nm . The patients were assessed at before , post-treatment , and 6 months after-treatment for pain , cervical range of motion and functional status . RESULTS We observed a significant decrease in pain at rest , at activity , and increase in pain threshold in the laser group compared to other groups . Improvement according to Nottingham Health Profile gave the superiority of the laser treatment . However , those differences among the groups were not observed at 6-month follow up . CONCLUSIONS Laser therapy could be useful as a treatment modality in myofascial pain syndrome because of its noninvasiveness , ease , and short-term application UNLABELLED The dentin hypersensitivity is a painful condition rather prevalent in the general population . There are several ways of treatment for such condition , including the low intensity lasers . The proposal of this study was to verify the effectiveness of the Gallium-Aluminum-Arsenide diode laser in the treatment of this painful condition , using a placebo as control . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Thirty-two patients were selected , 22 females and 10 males , with ages ranging from 20 to 52 years old . The 32 patients were r and omly distributed into two groups , treated and control ; the sample consisted of 68 teeth , 35 in the treated group and 33 in the control group . The treated group was exposed to six laser applications with intervals from 48 to 72 hours , and the control group received , as placebo , applications of a curing light . RESULTS A significant reduction was observed in the pain condition between the initial phase and after six laser applications ; however , such reduction could also be observed for the control group exposed to the placebo . CONCLUSION Therapy with the low intensity Gallium-Aluminum-Arsenide laser - AsGaAl induces a statistically significant reduction in the painful condition after each application and between the beginning and end of treatment , although there was no statistically significant difference between the treated group ( laser ) and the control group ( placebo ) at the end of treatment and after the mediate evaluation results ( after 6 weeks ) , this way impairing the real measurement of laser effectiveness and placebo effect Objective : To investigate the effectiveness of low‐level laser therapy in the treatment of temporom and ibular disorder and to compare treatment effects in myogenic and arthrogenic cases . Methods : Thirty‐five patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging and r and omly allocated to active treatment ( n=20 ) and placebo treatment ( n=15 ) groups . In addition to a daily exercise program , all patients were treated with fifteen sessions of low‐level laser therapy .  Pain , joint motion , number of joint sounds and tender points were assessed . Results : Significant reduction in pain was observed in both active and placebo treatment groups . Active and passive maximum mouth opening , lateral motion , number of tender points were significantly improved only in the active treatment group . Treatment effects in myogenic and arthrogenic cases were similar . Conclusion : Low‐level laser therapy can be considered as an alternative physical modality in the management of temporom and ibular disorder The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of low level laser application on postoperative pain after endodontic surgery in a double blind , r and omized clinical study . Fifty-two healthy adults undergoing endodontic surgery were included into the study . Subsequently to suturing , 26 patients had the operation site treated with an 809 nm-GaAlAs-laser ( oralaser voxx , Oralia GmbH , Konstanz , Germany ) at a power output of 50 mW and an irradiation time of 150 s. Laser treatment was simulated in further 26 patients . Patients were instructed to evaluate their postoperative pain on 7 days after surgery by means of a visual analogue scale ( VAS ) . The results revealed that the pain level in the laser group was lower than in the placebo group throughout the 7 day follow-up period . The differences , however , were significant only on the first postoperative day ( Mann-Whitney U-test , p<0.05 ) . Low level laser therapy can be beneficial for the reduction of postoperative pain . Its clinical efficiency and applicability with regard to endodontic surgery , however require further investigation . This is in particular true for the optimal energy dosage and the number of laser treatments needed after surgery Low-energy laser therapy has been applied in several rheumatoid and soft tissue disorders with varying rates of success . The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of laser therapy on cervical myofascial pain syndrome with a placebo-controlled double-blind prospect i ve study model . It was performed with a total of 53 patients ( 35 females and 18 males ) with cervical myofascial pain syndrome . In group 1 ( n=23 ) , GaAs laser treatment was applied over three trigger points bilaterally and also one point in the taut b and s in trapezius muscle bilaterally with a frequency of 1000 Hz for 2 min over each point once a day for 10 days during a period of 2 weeks . In group 2 ( n=25 ) , the same treatment protocol was given , but the laser instrument was switched off during applications . All patients in both groups were instructed to perform daily isometric exercises and stretching just short of pain for 2 weeks at home . Evaluations were performed just before treatment ( week 0 ) , immediately after ( week 2 ) , and 12 weeks later ( week 14 ) . Evaluation parameters included pain , algometric measurements , and cervical lateral flexion . Statistical analysis was done on data collected from three evaluation stages . The results were evaluated in 48 patients ( 32 females , 16 males ) . Week 2 and week 14 results showed significant improvement in all parameters for both groups . However , comparison of the percentage changes both immediately and 12 weeks after treatment did not show a significant difference relative to pretreatment values . In conclusion , the results of our study have not shown the superiority of GaAs laser therapy over placebo in the treatment of cervical myofascial pain syndrome , but we suggest that further studies on this topic be done using different laser types and dosages in larger patient population BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The efficacy of low level laser therapy ( LLLT ) in myofascial pain syndrome ( MPS ) seems controversial . Our aim was to clarify the effect of LLLT in MPS by using algometry and thermography . STUDY DESIGN / MATERIAL S AND METHODS Sixty-two patients with MPS having an active trigger point in the neck or upper back region were r and omly divided into two equal groups according to therapy applied ( group 1 : LLLT + stretching exercises , group 2 : stretching exercises alone ) . The outcome measures were pain measured with visual analogue scale ( VAS ) , algometry on the trigger point , algometric difference , thermographic difference , and thermal asymmetry . Comparison was made within and between the groups pre- and post-therapeutically and 3 weeks after therapy . RESULTS Mean pain values decreased more significantly in group 1 from baseline to 3 weeks follow up ( 7.54 - 3.06 ) while these values were 7.03 - 5.19 in group 2 ( P < 0.05 ) . Group comparisons revealed significant favorable differences in group 1 patients in terms of all other parameters at the first and the second evaluation post therapeutically ( P < 0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS LLLT seemed to be beneficial for pain in MPS by using algometry and thermography BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A prospect i ve , double-blind , r and omized , and controlled trial was conducted in patients with chronic myofascial pain syndrome ( MPS ) in the neck to evaluate the effects of infrared low level 904 nm Gallium-Arsenide ( Ga-As ) laser therapy ( LLLT ) on clinical and quality of life ( QoL ) . STUDY DESIGN / PATIENTS AND METHODS The study group consisted of 60 MPS patients . Patients were r and omly assigned to two treatment groups : Group I ( actual laser ; 30 patients ) and Group II ( placebo laser ; 30 patients ) . LLLT continued daily for 2 weeks except weekends . Follow-up measures were evaluated at baseline , 2 , 3 , and 12 weeks . All patients were evaluated with respect to pain at rest , pain at movement , number of trigger points ( TP ) , the Neck Pain and Disability Visual Analog Scale ( NPAD ) , Beck depression Inventory ( BDI ) , and the Nottingham Health Profile ( NHP ) . RESULTS In active laser group , statistically significant improvements were detected in all outcome measures compared with baseline ( P < 0.01 ) while in the placebo laser group , significant improvements were detected in only pain score at rest at the 1 week later of the end of treatment . The score for self-assessed improvement of pain was significantly different between the active and placebo laser groups ( 63 vs. 19 % ) ( P < 0.01 ) . CONCLUSION This study revealed that short-period application of LLLT is effective in pain relief and in the improvement of functional ability and QoL in patients with MPS Cervical dentine hypersensitivity is the most frequent complaint among reported odontalgias . Thus , this study evaluated the effectiveness of two types of lasers ( 660 nm wavelength red , and 830 nm wavelength infrared ) as dentine desensitizers , as well as both the immediate and late therapeutic effects in individuals 25 to 45 years of age . A total of 40 teeth with cervical exposure were treated in 4 sessions . They were divided into 2 groups according to treatment . A 660 nm wavelength red diode laser and an 830 nm wavelength infrared diode laser were used . Dentine sensitivity to cold nociceptive stimulus was evaluated by means of a pain numeric scale from zero to 10 before each treatment session , at 15 and 30 min after irradiation , and in a follow-up period of 15 , 30 and 60 days after the end of treatment . Significant levels of dentinal desensitization were only found in patients ranging in age from 25 to 35 years . The 660 nm red diode laser was more effective than the 830 nm infrared laser and a higher level of desensitization was observed at the 15 and 30 minute post-irradiation examinations . The immediate and late therapeutic effects of the 660 nm red diode laser were more evident in 25 - 35-year-old patients compared with those of the 830 nm infrared diode laser , in terms of the different age groups The efficacy of low-level laser therapy ( LLLT ) in myofascial pain syndrome ( MPS ) seems controversial . A prospect i ve , double-blind , r and omized controlled trial was conducted in patients with chronic MPS in the neck to evaluate the effects of low-level 830-nm gallium arsenide aluminum ( Ga – As – Al ) laser therapy . The study group consisted of 64 MPS patients . The patients were r and omly assigned into two groups . In group 1 ( n = 32 ) , Ga – As – Al laser treatment was applied over three trigger points bilaterally for 2 min over each point once a day for 15 days during a period of 3 weeks . In group 2 ( n = 32 ) , the same treatment protocol was given , but the laser instrument was switched off during applications . All patients in both groups performed daily isometric exercise and stretching exercises for cervical region . Parameters were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks . All patients were evaluated with respect to pain ( at rest , movement , and night ) and assessed by visual analog scale , measurement of active range of motion using an inclinometer and a goniometer , and the neck disability index . In both groups , statistically significant improvements were detected in all outcome measures compared with baseline ( p < 0.05 ) . However , no significant differences were obtained between the two groups ( p > 0.05 ) . In conclusion , although the laser therapy has no superiority over placebo groups in this study , we can not exclude the possibility of effectivity with another treatment regimen including different laser wavelengths and dosages ( different intensity and density and /or treatment interval ) OBJECTIVE To compare the clin 
    Output:
    
Only limited evidence indicated that  LLLT is more effective than placebo , sham laser , and other active treatments