***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE It has been suggested that cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation ( ES ) may enhance motor recovery after stroke . We have investigated the effects of ES of the wrist extensors on impairment of wrist function and on upper-limb disability in patients being rehabilitated after acute stroke . METHODS We recruited 60 hemiparetic patients ( mean age , 68 years ) 2 to 4 weeks after stroke into a r and omized , controlled , parallel-group study comparing st and ard rehabilitation treatment with st and ard treatment plus ES of wrist extensors ( 3 times 30 minutes daily for 8 weeks ) . Isometric strength of wrist extensors was measured using a device built for that purpose . Upper-limb disability was assessed with use of the  Action Research Arm Test ( ARAT ) . Observations were continued for 32 weeks ( 24 weeks after the finish of ES or the control intervention phase ) . RESULTS The change in isometric strength of wrist extensors ( at an angle of 0 degrees extension ) was significantly greater in the ES group than the control group at both 8 and 32 weeks ( P=0.004 , P=0.014 by Mann Whitney U test ) . At week 8 the grasp and grip subscores of the ARAT increased significantly in the ES group compared with that in the control group ( P=0.013 and P=0.02 , respectively ) ; a similar trend was seen for the total ARAT score ( P=0.11 ) . In the subgroup of 33 patients with some residual wrist extensor strength at study entry ( moment at 0 degrees extension > 0 ) , the ARAT total score had increased at week 8 by a mean of 21.1 ( SD , 12.7 ) in the ES group compared with 10.3 ( SD , 9.0 ) in the control group ( P=0.024 , Mann Whitney U test ) ; however , at 32 weeks the differences between these 2 subgroups were no longer statistically significant . CONCLUSIONS ES of the wrist extensors enhances the recovery of isometric wrist extensor strength in hemiparetic stroke patients .  Upper-limb disability was reduced after 8 weeks of ES therapy , with benefits most apparent in those with some residual motor function at the wrist . However , it is not clear how long the improvements in upper-limb disability are maintained after ES is discontinued BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Rehabilitation care after stroke is highly variable and increasingly shorter in duration . The effect of therapeutic exercise on impairments and functional limitations after stroke is not clear . The objective of this study was to determine whether a structured , progressive , physiologically based exercise program for subacute stroke produces gains greater than those attributable to spontaneous recovery and usual care . METHODS This r and omized , controlled , single-blind clinical trial was conducted in a metropolitan area and 17 participating healthcare institutions . We included persons with stroke who were living in the community . One hundred patients ( mean age , 70 years ; mean Orpington score , 3.4 ) consented and were r and omized from a screened sample of 582 . Ninety-two subjects completed the trial . Intervention was a structured , progressive , physiologically based , therapist-supervised , in-home program of thirty-six 90-minute sessions over 12 weeks targeting flexibility , strength , balance , endurance , and upper-extremity function . Main outcome measures were postintervention strength ( ankle and knee isometric peak torque , grip strength ) , upper- and lower-extremity motor control ( Fugl Meyer ) , balance ( Berg and functional reach ) , endurance ( peak aerobic capacity and exercise duration ) , upper-extremity function ( Wolf Motor Function Test ) , and mobility ( timed 10-m walk and 6-minute walk distance ) . RESULTS In the intention-to-treat multivariate analysis of variance testing the overall effect , the intervention produced greater gains than usual care ( Wilk 's lambda=0.64 , P=0.0056 ) . Both intervention and usual care groups improved in strength , balance , upper- and lower-extremity motor control , upper-extremity function , and gait velocity . Gains for the intervention group exceeded those in the usual care group in balance , endurance , peak aerobic capacity , and mobility . Upper-extremity gains exceeded those in the usual care group only in patients with higher baseline function . CONCLUSIONS This structured , progressive program of therapeutic exercise in persons who had completed acute rehabilitation services produced gains in endurance , balance , and mobility beyond those attributable to spontaneous recovery and usual care Stein J , Krebs HI , Frontera WR , Fasoli SE , Hughes R , Hogan N : Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke . Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:720–728 . Objective : This study examined whether incorporating progressive resistive training into robot-aided exercise training provides incremental benefits over active-assisted robot-aided exercise for the upper limb after stroke . Design : A total of 47 individuals at least 1 yr poststroke were enrolled in this 6-wk training protocol . Paretic upper limb motor abilities were evaluated using clinical measures and a robot-based assessment to determine eligibility for robot-aided progressive resistive training at study entry . Subjects capable of participating in resistance training were r and omized to receive either active-assisted robot-aided exercises or robot-aided progressive resistance training . Subjects who were incapable of participating in resistance training underwent active-assisted robotic therapy and were again screened for eligibility after 3 wks of robotic therapy . Those subjects capable of participating in resistance training at 3 wks were then r and omized to receive either robot-aided resistance training or to continue with robot-aided active-assisted training . Results : One subject withdrew due to unrelated medical issues , and data for the remaining 46 subjects were analyzed . Subjects in all groups showed improvement in measures of motor control ( mean increase in Fugl-Meyer of 3.3 ; 95 % confidence interval , 2.2–4.4 ) and maximal force ( mean increase in maximal force of 3.5 N , P = 0.027 ) over the course of robot-aided exercise training . No differences in outcome measures were observed between the resistance training groups and the matched active-assisted training groups . Subjects ’ ability to perform the robotic task at the time of group assignment predicted the magnitude of the gain in motor control . Conclusion : The incorporation of robot-aided progressive resistance exercises into a program of robot-aided exercise did not favorably or negatively affect the gains in motor control or strength associated with this training , though interpretation of these results is limited by sample size . Individuals with better motor control at baseline experienced greater increases in motor control with robotic training Positional feedback ( PF ) and electrical stimulation were combined in a new treatment modality for facilitating wrist extension in stroke patients . Thirty adult hemiparetic patients lacking normal voluntary wrist extension were r and omly placed in control and study groups . The control group received conventional therapy while the study group received positional feedback stimulation training ( PFST ) in addition to conventional treatment . At the end of the 4-week program , study patients showed a 280 % increase in isometric extension torque when the wrist was positioned in 30 degrees of extension and 70 % increase when positioned in 30 degrees of flexion . Control patients showed no significant changes in torque . Study patients made an average 200 % gain in selective range of motion over their starting levels while controls made only a 50 % increase . Treatment using automated PFST equipment allows controlled repetitive isotonic exercise and facilitation of wrist extension without continuous one-on-one therapist/patient supervision PURPOSE To determine whether isokinetic training can improve the strength of the hemiparetic knee musculature , functional mobility , and physical activity and to evaluate its effect on spasticity in long-term stroke survivors . DESIGN Nonr and omized self-controlled trial . SUBJECTS A volunteer sample of 15 community-dwelling stroke survivors of at least 6 months . INTERVENTION A 6-week ( 3 days/week , 40 minutes/day ) program consisting of warm-up , stretches , reciprocal knee extension and flexion isokinetic strengthening , and cool-down for the paretic limb . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Peak isokinetic hamstring and quadriceps torque , quadriceps spasticity , gait velocity , timed Up and Go , timed stair climb , and the Human Activity Profile ( HAP ) scores were recorded at baseline , after training , and 4 weeks after training cessation ( follow-up ) . RESULTS Paretic muscle strength improved after training ( p < .05 ) while tone remained consistent ( p > .87 ) . Gait velocity increased after training ( p < .05 ) and at follow-up ( p < .05 ) . Changes in stair climbing and timed Up and Go were not significant ( p > .37 ; p > .91 ) , although subjects perceived gains in their physical abilities at follow-up ( p < .01 ) . CONCLUSIONS Gains in strength and gait velocity without concomitant increases in muscle tone are possible after a short-term strengthening program for stroke survivors . The psychological benefit associated with physical activity is significant Background and Purpose — To evaluate the efficacy of supervised high-intensity progressive resistance training ( PRT ) on lower extremity strength , function , and disability in older , long-term stroke survivors . Methods — Forty-two volunteers aged 50 years and above , 6 months to 6 years after a single mild to moderate stroke , were r and omized into either a control group of upper extremity stretching or a PRT group that received a 12-week supervised high-intensity resistance training program consisting of bilateral leg press ( LP ) , unilateral paretic and nonparetic knee extension ( KE ) , ankle dorsiflexion ( DF ) , and plantarflexion ( PF ) exercises .  Functional performance was assessed using the 6-minute walk , stair-climb time , repeated chair-rise time , and habitual and maximal gait velocities . Self-reported changes in function and disability were evaluated using the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument ( LLFDI ) . Results — Single-repetition maximum strength significantly improved in the PRT group for LP ( 16.2 % ) , paretic KE ( 31.4 % ) , and nonparetic KE ( 38.2 % ) with no change in the control group . Paretic ankle DF ( 66.7 % versus −24.0 % ) , paretic ankle PF ( 35.5 % versus −20.3 % ) , and nonparetic ankle PF ( 14.7 % versus −13.8 % ) significantly improved in the PRT group compared with the control . The PRT group showed significant improvement in self-reported function and disability with no change in the control . There was no significant difference between groups for any performance-based measure of function . Conclusions — High-intensity PRT improves both paretic and nonparetic lower extremity strength after stroke , and results in reductions in functional limitations and disability OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a program of muscle strengthening and physical conditioning on  impairment and disability in chronic stroke subjects . DESIGN A r and omized pretest and posttest control group , followed by a single-group pretest and posttest design . SUBJECTS Thirteen community-dwelling stroke survivors of at least 9 months . INTERVENTION A 10-week ( 3 days/week ) program consisting of a warm-up , aerobic exercises , lower extremity muscle strengthening , and a cool-down . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Peak isokinetic torque of the major muscle groups of the affected lower limb , quadriceps and ankle plantarflexor spasticity , gait speed , rate of stair climbing , the Human Activity Profile ( HAP ) , and the Nottingham Health Profile ( NHP ) were recorded twice for the treatment group and three times for the control group . RESULTS Significant improvements were found for all the selected outcome measures ( HAP , NHP , and gait speed ) for the treatment group ( p < .001 ) . In terms of overall training effects , the 13 subjects demonstrated increases in strength of the affected major muscle groups , in HAP and NHP profiles , and in gait speed and rate of stair climbing without concomitant increases in either quadriceps or ankle plantarflexor spasticity . CONCLUSIONS The 10-week combined program of muscle strengthening and physical conditioning result ed in gains in all measures of impairment and disability . These gains were not associated with measurable changes of spasticity in either quadriceps or ankle plantarflexors BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE After stroke , many individuals have chronic unilateral motor dysfunction in the upper extremity that severely limits their functional movement control . The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of electromyography-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the wrist and finger extension muscles in individuals who had a stroke > or = 1 year earlier . METHODS Eleven individuals volunteered to participate and were r and omly assigned to either the electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation experimental group ( 7 subjects ) or the control group ( 4 subjects ) . After completing a pretest involving 5 motor capability tests , the poststroke subjects completed 12 treatment sessions ( 30 minutes each ) according to group assignments . Once the control subjects completed 12 sessions attempting wrist and finger extension without any external assistance and were posttested , they were then given 12 sessions of the rehabilitation treatment . RESULTS The Box and Block test and the force-generation task ( sustained muscular contraction ) revealed significant findings ( P<0 . 05 ) . The experimental group moved significantly more blocks and displayed a higher isometric force impulse after the rehabilitation treatment . CONCLUSIONS Two lines of evidence clearly support the use of the electromyography-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment to rehabilitate wrist and 
    Output:
    
Strengthening interventions increase strength , improve activity , and do not increase spasticity .
These findings suggest that strengthening programs should be part of rehabilitation after stroke