***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE To assess the impact and cost-effectiveness of two information-based provider reminder interventions design ed to improve self-care management and outcomes of heart failure ( HF ) patients . DATA SOURCES / STUDY SETTING Interview and agency administrative data on 628 home care patients with a primary diagnosis of HF . STUDY DESIGN Patients were treated by nurses r and omly assigned to usual care or one of two intervention groups . The basic intervention was an e-mail to the patient 's nurse highlighting six HF-specific clinical recommendations . The augmented intervention supplemented the initial nurse reminder with additional clinician and patient re sources . DATA COLLECTION Patient interviews were conducted 45 days post admission to measure self-management behaviors , HF-specific outcomes ( Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Question naire-KCCQ ) , health-related quality of life ( EuroQoL ) , and service use . PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Both interventions improved the mean KCCQ summary score ( 15.3 and 12.9 percent , respectively ) relative to usual care ( p < or = .05 ) . The basic intervention also yielded a higher EuroQoL score relative to usual care ( p < or = .05 ) . In addition , the interventions had a positive impact on medication knowledge , diet , and weight monitoring . The basic intervention was more cost-effective than the augmented intervention in improving clinical outcomes . CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the positive impact of targeting evidence -based computer reminders to home health nurses to improve patient self-care behaviors , knowledge , and clinical outcomes . It also advances the field 's limited underst and ing of the cost-effectiveness of selected strategies for translating research into practice BACKGROUND Heart failure , a condition predominantly affecting the elderly , represents an ever-increasing clinical and financial burden for the NHS . Cardiac rehabilitation , a service that incorporates patient education , exercise training and lifestyle modification , requires further evaluation in heart failure management . AIM The aim of this study was to determine whether a cardiac rehabilitation programme improved on the outcomes of an outpatient heart failure clinic ( st and ard care ) for patients , over 60 years of age , with chronic heart failure . METHODS Two hundred patients ( 60 - 89 years , 66 % male ) with New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) II or III heart failure confirmed by echocardiography were r and omised . Both st and ard care and experimental groups attended clinic with a cardiologist and specialist nurse every 8 weeks . Interventions included exercise prescription , education , dietetics , occupational therapy and psychosocial counselling . The main outcome measures were functional status ( NYHA , 6-min walk ) , health-related quality of life ( MLHF and EuroQol ) and hospital admissions . RESULTS There were significant improvements in MLHF and EuroQol scores , NYHA classification and 6-min walking distance ( meters ) at 24 weeks between the groups ( p<0.001 ) . The experimental group had fewer admissions ( 11 vs. 33 , p<0.01 ) and spent fewer days in hospital ( 41 vs. 187 , p<0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS Cardiac rehabilitation , already widely established in the UK , offers an effective model of care for older patients with heart failure Background Self-management programs for patients with heart failure can reduce hospitalizations and mortality . However , no programs have analyzed their usefulness for patients with low literacy . We compared the efficacy of a heart failure self-management program design ed for patients with low literacy versus usual care .  Methods We performed a 12-month r and omized controlled trial . From November 2001 to April 2003 , we enrolled participants aged 30–80 , who had heart failure and took furosemide .  Intervention patients received education on self-care emphasizing daily weight measurement , diuretic dose self-adjustment , and symptom recognition and response . Picture-based educational material s , a digital scale , and scheduled telephone follow-up were provided to reinforce adherence . Control patients received a generic heart failure brochure and usual care . Primary outcomes were combined hospitalization or death , and heart failure-related quality of life . Results 123 patients ( 64 control , 59 intervention ) participated ; 41 % had inadequate literacy . Patients in the intervention group had a lower rate of hospitalization or death ( crude incidence rate ratio ( IRR ) = 0.69 ; CI 0.4 , 1.2 ; adjusted IRR = 0.53 ; CI 0.32 , 0.89 ) . This difference was larger for patients with low literacy ( IRR = 0.39 ; CI 0.16 , 0.91 ) than for higher literacy ( IRR = 0.56 ; CI 0.3 , 1.04 ) , but the interaction was not statistically significant . At 12 months , more patients in the intervention group reported monitoring weights daily ( 79 % vs. 29 % , p < 0.0001 ) . After adjusting for baseline demographic and treatment differences , we found no difference in heart failure-related quality of life at 12 months ( difference = -2 ; CI -5 , + 9 ) . Conclusion A primary care-based heart failure self-management program design ed for patients with low literacy reduces the risk of hospitalizations or death Objective To test the effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services such that intervention and control groups have access to the same clinical care . Design Research er blind , multicentre , r and omised controlled trial . Setting UK primary care ( Lothian , Scotl and ) . Participants Adults with at least one admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD ) in the year before r and omisation . We excluded people who had other significant lung disease , who were unable to provide informed consent or complete the study , or who had other significant social or clinical problems . Interventions Participants were recruited between 21 May 2009 and 28 March 2011 , and central ly r and omised to receive telemonitoring or conventional self monitoring . Using a touch screen , telemonitoring participants recorded a daily question naire about symptoms and treatment use , and monitored oxygen saturation using linked instruments . Algorithms , based on the symptom score , generated alerts if readings were omitted or breached thresholds . Both groups received similar care from existing clinical services . Main outcome measures The primary outcome was time to hospital admission due to COPD exacerbation up to one year after r and omisation . Other outcomes included number and duration of admissions , and vali date d question naire assessment s of health related quality of life ( using St George ’s respiratory question naire ( SGRQ ) ) , anxiety or depression ( or both ) , self efficacy , knowledge , and adherence to treatment . Analysis was intention to treat . Results Of 256 patients completing the study , 128 patients were r and omised to telemonitoring and 128 to usual care ;  baseline characteristics of each group were similar . The number of days to admission did not differ significantly between groups ( adjusted hazard ratio 0.98 , 95 % confidence interval 0.66 to 1.44 ) . Over one year , the mean number of COPD admissions was similar in both groups ( telemonitoring 1.2 admissions per person ( st and ard deviation 1.9 ) v control 1.1 ( 1.6 ) ; P=0.59 ) . Mean duration of COPD admissions over one year was also similar between groups ( 9.5 days per person ( st and ard deviation 19.1 ) v 8.8 days ( 15.9 ) ; P=0.88 ) . The intervention had no significant effect on SGRQ scores between groups ( 68.2 ( st and ard deviation 16.3 ) v 67.3 ( 17.3 ) ; adjusted mean difference 1.39 ( 95 % confidence interval −1.57 to 4.35 ) ) , or on other question naire outcomes . Conclusions In participants with a history of admission for exacerbations of COPD , telemonitoring was not effective in postponing admissions and did not improve quality of life . The positive effect of telemonitoring seen in previous trials could be due to enhancement of the underpinning clinical service rather than the telemonitoring communication . Trial registration IS RCT N96634935 . Funding : The trial was funded by an NHS applied research programme grant from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish government ( ARPG/07/03 ) . The funder had no role in study design and the collection , analysis , and interpretation of data and the writing of the article and the decision to su bmi t it for publication . NHS Lothian supported the telemonitoring service and the clinical services OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to make a head-to-head comparison of 2 common forms of multidisciplinary chronic heart failure ( CHF ) management . BACKGROUND Although direct patient contact appears to be best in delivering CHF management overall , the precise form to optimize health outcomes is less clear . METHODS This prospect i ve , multicenter r and omized controlled trial with blinded endpoint adjudication comprised 280 hospitalized CHF patients ( 73 % male , age 71 ± 14 years , and 73 % with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45 % ) r and omized to home-based intervention ( HBI ) or specialized CHF clinic-based intervention ( CBI )  . The primary endpoint was all-cause , unplanned hospitalization or death during 12- to 18-month follow-up . Secondary endpoints included type/ duration of hospitalization and healthcare costs . RESULTS The primary endpoint occurred in 102 of 143 ( 71 % ) HBI versus 104 of 137 ( 76 % ) CBI patients ( adjusted hazard ratio [ HR ] : 0.97 [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) : 0.73 to 1.30 ] , p = 0.861 ) : 96 ( 67.1 % ) HBI versus 95 ( 69.3 % ) CBI patients had an unplanned hospitalization ( p = 0.887 ) , and 31 ( 21.7 % ) versus 38 ( 27.7 % ) died ( p = 0.252 ) . The median duration of each unplanned hospitalization was significantly less in the HBI group ( 4.0 [ interquartile range ( IQR ) : 2.0 to 7.0 ] days vs. 6.0 [ IQR : 3.5 to 13 ] days ; p = 0.004 ) . Overall , 75 % of all hospitalization was attributable to 64 ( 22.9 % ) patients , of whom 43 ( 67 % ) were CBI patients ( adjusted odds ratio : 2.55 [ 95 % CI : 1.37 to 4.73 ] , p = 0.003 ) . HBI was associated with significantly fewer days of all-cause hospitalization ( -35 % ; p = 0.003 ) and from cardiovascular causes ( -37 % ; p = 0.025 ) but not for CHF ( -24 % ; p = 0.218 ) . Consequently , healthcare costs ( $ AU3.93 vs. $ AU5.53 million ) were significantly less for the HBI group ( median : $ AU34 [ IQR : 13 to 81 ] per day vs. $ AU52 [ 17 to 140 ] per day ; p = 0.030 ) . CONCLUSIONS HBI was not superior to CBI in reducing all-cause death or hospitalization .  However , HBI was associated with significantly lower healthcare costs , attributable to fewer days of hospitalization . ( Which Heart failure Intervention is most Cost-effective & consumer friendly in reducing Hospital care [ WHICH ? ] ; ACTRN12607000069459 ) While disease management appears to be effective in selected , small groups of CHF patients from r and omized controlled trials , its effectiveness in a broader CHF patient population is not known . This prospect i ve , quasi-experimental study compared patient outcomes under a nurse practitioner-led disease management model ( intervention group ) with outcomes under usual care ( control group ) in both primary and tertiary medical centers . The study included 969 veterans ( 458 intervention , 511 control ) treated for CHF at six VA medical centers . Intervention patients had significantly fewer ( p<0.05 ) CHF and all-cause admissions at one-year follow-up , and lower mortality at both one- and two-year follow-up . These data provide support for the potential effectiveness of the intervention , and suggest that the evidence from RCTs of disease management models for CHF can be translated into clinical practice , even without the benefits of a selected patient population and dedicated re sources often found in RCTs Heart failure ( HF ) is a major and growing public health problem in the United States . On the basis of current trajectories , it has been estimated that , over the next 20 years , the prevalence of HF will increase by 25 % , from 2.8 % to 3.5 % of the population ( Figure 1).1 The increased prevalence may be expected to contribute to an increase in annual direct medical costs from the present estimate of $ 24.7 billion to approximately $ 77.7 billion , in 2008 dollars . At the same time , indirect costs — that is , costs related to lost productivity due to morbidity and mortality — may be expected to increase from $ 9.7 to $ 17.4 billion . If current legislative and regulatory efforts are successful at exp and ing healthcare access while improving affordability , systematic approaches must be developed and implemented to drive cost-effectiveness . The management of patients with HF will be front and center in efforts to achieve this goal . Although many questions remain , extensive research performed to date indicates that certain disease management interventions cost-effectively improve clinical outcomes in patients with HF . Home monitoring — providing continuity of patient assessment and care beyond the hospital and 
    Output:
    
Studies dating from the 1990s demonstrated that multicomponent interventions could reduce hospitalizations , readmissions , mortality , and costs and improve quality of life .
Self-management support  appeared more effective when included in multicomponent interventions .
The independent contribution of eHealth interventions remains unclear .