***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: We prospect ively studied the management and outcome of 2,834 children , aged 1 month to 18 years , who presented to the emergency department of the Children 's Hospital of Philadelphia for laceration repair . Patients with bite wounds were excluded from the study . Eight percent ( 239 ) of all patients had complications on initial evaluation ; the most common was the presence of a foreign body ( 55 ) . Infection on presentation was diagnosed in 22 cases ( 0.8 % ) . All of these patients had delayed their initial care beyond 18 hours ( range , 18 to 288 hours ; mean , 18 hours ) . Other factors significantly associated with infection on presentation included occurrence of the injury outdoors ( 16 ; P less than .001 ) , injury due to broken " street " glass ( seven ; P less than .02 ) , and injury of an extremity ( 18 ; P less than .01 ) . The rate of prerepair infection was not influenced by the size of the wound . Infections developed subsequent to initial repair in 34 cases ( 1.2 % ) . Factors associated with development of subsequent infection included use of prophylactic antibiotics , use of subcutaneous sutures , laceration length of more than 5.0 cm , glass or ice as a causative agent , and upper- or lower-extremity involvement . The majority of injuries were repaired by ED personnel without surgical consultation . Postrepair infection rates were not influenced by the specialty of the physician managing the case . Although our study was not design ed to specifically test the issue , prophylactic antibiotics were of no proven benefit in reducing infection rates in any group of patients analyzed STUDY OBJECTIVE More than 11 million patients with traumatic wounds are seen annually in emergency departments . We developed and vali date d a data registry for traumatic wounds treated in the ED . DESIGN Prospect i ve , consecutive patient enrollment with a validation cohort of a convenience sample of 100 patients . SETTING University-affiliated hospital ED . PARTICIPANTS For all patients with traumatic wounds requiring sutures ,  wound registry data sheets were completed at the time of initial visit using a closed- question format . Data recorded included demographic characteristics , time from injury to evaluation , pertinent medical history , wound characteristics , type of anesthesia , details of wound-cleansing methods , details of wound closure , and postoperative care . We devised a follow-up tool to evaluate for the presence of infection and short-term cosmetic appearance . Interphysician reliability was assessed for wound description , presence of infection , and cosmetic appearance by use of the kappa statistic . RESULTS A wound registry data collection instrument that takes less than 1 minute to complete and enables the collection of most wound management techniques used by emergency physicians was found to have substantial interobserver concordance for wound description ( kappa range , .55 to .97 ) , wound infection ( kappa = 1.0 ) and overall cosmetic appearance ( kappa = .61 ) . CONCLUSION The wound registry is a reliable data collection instrument that is easy to use . It may be useful as a continuous quality -improvement tool or for st and ardization of wound surveillance and treatment data to facilitate future prospect i ve studies in wound management In wounds of the h and and forearm treated within 4 h of injury , prophylactic clindamycin , in a dose of 150 mg 6‐hourly for 5 days , did not reduce the infection rate . In wounds treated after 4 h the infection rate was reduced , but not significantly so . There was a significant reduction in the infection rate comparing all wounds treated within 4 h with those treated after 4 h. Early treatment of wounds is more important than prophylactic antibiotics , although these may have a part to play where late treatment is unavoidable Introduction Primary wound closure in the management of open tibial fractures has generally been discouraged . Several prior studies suggest that infections are not caused by the initial contamination , but are instead the result of organisms acquired in the hospital . Primary wound closure after adequate wound care and fracture stabilisation could therefore be considered a reasonable option . Material s and methods We analysed 95 patients with open tibial fractures ( Gustilo– And erson type 1 to 3A ) treated with primary fracture stabilisation and either delayed wound closure ( group I ) or primary wound closure ( group II ) , with a minimum follow-up of 12 months . Results Group I included 46 patients with a mean age of 30.2 years ( 16–56 ) , and a mean follow-up of 13.5 months ( 12–18 ) . Group II included 49 patients with a mean age of 33.4 ( 18–69 ) , and a mean follow up of 13.7 months ( 12–16 ) . One infection developed in group I ( 2 % ) , and two infections developed in group II ( 4 % ) . This difference was not found to have any statistical significance . Conclusion Our results support other recent reports that the infection rate is not increased following primary wound closure after thorough debridement of less severe open fractures . The length of stay following primary closure ( group II ) was significantly shorter , and that should result in substantially more cost effective care of these serious injuries . We conclude that primary wound closure is a safe option in properly selected cases . Prospect i ve multi-centre studies are needed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of this treatment alternative Uncertainty about the existence and duration of a " golden period " for suture repair of simple wounds led us to evaluate prospect ively the consequences of delayed primary closure on wound healing .  Wounds were eligible for study if they were not grossly infected , and had no associated injuries to nerves , blood vessels , tendons , or bone . Three hundred seventy-two patients underwent suture repair ; 204 ( 54.8 % ) returned for review seven days later . The mean time from wounding to repair for all patients was 24.2 + /- 18.8 hours . Wounds closed at up to 19 hours after wounding had a significantly higher rate of healing than those closed later : 82 of 89 ( 92.1 % ) compared with 89 of 115 ( 77.4 % ) ( P less than .01 ) . Of 23 wounds sutured 48 or more hours ( mean , 65.3 ) after wounding , 18 ( 78.3 % ) were healing at follow-up . In contrast to wounds involving other body areas , the healing of head wounds was virtually independent of time from injury to repair : 42 of 44 ( 95.5 % ) wounds involving the head and repaired later than 19 hours after injury were healing , compared with 47 of 71 ( 66.2 % ) of all other wounds ( P less than .001 ) . On the basis of these data we conclude that there is a 19-hour " golden period " for repair of simple wounds involving body areas other than the head , after which sutured wounds are significantly less likely to heal , and the healing of clean , simple wounds involving the head is unaffected by the interval between injury and repair BACKGROUND / AIMS To compare two non-invasive techniques of assessing wound healing , photography and high resolution ultrasound ( HRUS ) scanning , in experimentally induced full-thickness human skin wounds . METHODS Punch biopsy wounds , 4 mm in diameter , were made aseptically through locally anaesthetised skin on the anterior ( volar ) surface of the non-dominant forearm , 3 cm below the base of the cubital fossa , of 20 human participants . The wounds were treated with a topical antibiotic and covered for 3 days with Mepore sterile dressings . Wound healing was assessed on post-operative days 3 , 7 , 14 and 21 from photographs and HRUS B-scans . All photographs were taken of the wound site and adjacent intact skin under st and ardised conditions . The prints obtained were examined visually and digitised . Digital HRUS B-scans were taken through the centre of the wound bed and the adjacent intact skin parallel to the epidermis . Using the scanner 's calibrated linear measurement capability , the wound width was measured adjacent to the deep surface of the scab , at the base of the wound , and midway between these two levels . RESULTS The wound margins were more clearly defined in the HRUS scans than in the photographs of the wounds ; in some of the latter the scab masked the wound margins . Changes in the surface width of the wound were affected by the time of scab dehiscence , which varied between volunteers . There was less individual variation in the width of the base of the wound , as measured from the HRUS scans . CONCLUSIONS In contrast to photography , which allows recording of changes in the superficial aspect of the wound only , HRUS scanning permits the quantitative assessment of structural changes deep within the wound . Temporal changes in the width of the base of the wound can be used as an indication of the progress of repair 
    Output:
    
There is currently no systematic evidence to guide clinical decision-making regarding the timing for closure of traumatic wounds .