***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Study Design . A r and omized trial . Objective . To evaluate the effectiveness of a semi-intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with chronic low back pain in an outpatient setting . Summary and Background Data . Systematic review s have shown that there is strong evidence that intensive multidisciplinary treatment ( > 100 hours ) , which includes functional restoration , improves function among chronic patients with low back pain , and moderate evidence that it reduces pain but contradictory evidence regarding improvement of working ability . However , there is paucity of data whether semi-intensive outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation in groups is more effective than individual physiotherapy . Material s and Methods . A total of 120 women employed as healthcare and social care professionals with nonspecific chronic low back pain were recruited from two occupational healthcare centers . The patients were r and omized into two intervention programs . Multidisciplinary rehabilitation ( n = 59 ) was conducted in groups and comprised of physical training , workplace interventions , back school , relaxation training , and cognitive-behavioral stress management methods for 70 hours . The individual physiotherapy ( n = 61 ) included physical exercise and passive treatment methods administered for 10 hours . Main outcome measures were : back pain and sciatic pain intensity , disability , sick leaves , healthcare consumption , symptoms of depression , and beliefs of working ability after 2 years . Results . There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in main outcome measures just after rehabilitation , at 6- , at 12- , or 24-month follow-up . In both intervention arms , however , the before- and -after comparison showed favorable effects , and the effects were still maintained at 2 years follow-up . Conclusions . The results of this study indicate that semilight outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for female chronic low back pain patients does not offer incremental benefits when compared with rehabilitation carried out by a physiotherapist having a cognitive-behavioral way of administering the treatment Introduction It was postulated that workers , at the sub-acute stage after injury , respond differently to clinical and occupational interventions offered in a workers ’ compensation environment . Individual worker risk of disability , it was further believed , would influence the effectiveness of early intervention . The objective of the current pilot study was to evaluate return to work ( RTW ) outcomes following proactive , combined clinical , occupational and case management-based interdisciplinary early intervention , provided in a workers ’ compensation environment 4–10 weeks of onset of back pain , to workers with medium and high risk for disability . Methods The project was a controlled study comparing conventional workers ’ compensation case management with integrated , interdisciplinary and multimodal early intervention ( hereinafter referred to as “ EI ” ) . At baseline , risk status was determined by a vali date d Risk for Disability Question naire by Carragee et al. ( Spine 5(1):24–35 , 2005 ) . Seventeen workers at high risk of protracted disability and 20 workers at moderate risk of disability received conventional case management , and 17 workers assessed at high risk of protracted disability and 18 workers at moderate risk of disability received the Early Intervention . Results At 3 months post back pain onset , no statistically significant differences were identified in RTW outcomes between conventional case management and the Early Intervention . However , by 6 months post back pain onset , workers at high risk of work disability who received the Early Intervention were significantly more likely to RTW than high risk workers who received conventional case management . In contrast , moderate risk workers continued to exhibit no statistically significant differences in RTW outcomes . Conclusion Multimodal Early Intervention in the workers ’ compensation case management context is likely effective for workers with sub-acute back pain who are at high risk of occupational disability . The comprehensive Early Intervention is , however , likely redundant for workers who are not at high risk for disability and should not be applied indiscriminately . Further studies are required to determine longer-term Early Intervention outcomes , and to replicate the findings using a r and omized control design . Also , with a larger sample size , it will be possible to determine predictors of occupational outcomes & NA ; A cognitive – behavioral return‐to‐work focused program was evaluated in a r and omized controlled design , and the effects were compared between two groups of women with musculoskeletal pain . One group of patients ( n=36 ) had a history of long‐term sick leave ( > 12 months ) at the start of the program and the other ( n=36 ) had a history of short‐term sick leave ( 2–6 months ) . The outpatient treatment program , conducted by a psychologist , included 12 sessions with the primary aim to help the patients return‐to‐work . The treatment first included teaching of coping strategies such as applied relaxation , stress management , grade d activity training and pacing . Thereafter the patients were taught how to manage difficulties at their return‐to‐work and how to generalize coping strategies to different risk factors at their work places . The control condition received treatment‐as‐usual . The results showed that the cognitive – behavioral return‐to‐work program  was more effective than the treatment‐as‐usual control condition in reducing the number of days on sick leave for patients on short‐term sick leave , but not for patients on long‐term sick leave . The treatment program also helped the patients on short‐term sick leave to increase their ability to control and decrease pain and to increase their general activity level compared to the control condition . These results underscore the need for an early return‐to‐work focused rehabilitation to prevent long‐term sick leave and disability Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated care programme , combining a patient directed and a workplace directed intervention , for patients with chronic low back pain . Design Population based r and omised controlled trial . Setting Primary care ( 10 physiotherapy practice s , one occupational health service , one occupational therapy practice ) and secondary care ( five hospitals ) . Participants 134 adults aged 18 - 65 sick listed for at least 12 weeks owing to low back pain . Intervention Patients were r and omly assigned to usual care ( n=68 ) or integrated care ( n=66 ) . Integrated care consisted of a workplace intervention based on participatory ergonomics , involving a supervisor , and a grade d activity programme based on cognitive behavioural principles . Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the duration of time off work ( work disability ) due to low back pain until full sustainable return to work . Secondary outcome measures were intensity of pain and functional status . Results The median duration until sustainable return to work was 88 days in the integrated care group compared with 208 days in the usual care group ( P=0.003 ) . Integrated care was effective on return to work ( hazard ratio 1.9 , 95 % confidence interval 1.2 to 2.8 , P=0.004 ) . After 12 months , patients in the integrated care group improved significantly more on functional status compared with patients in the usual care group ( P=0.01 ) . Improvement of pain between the groups did not differ significantly . Conclusion The integrated care programme substantially reduced disability due to chronic low back pain in private and working life . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT N28478651 This study investigated the effect of a back school rehabilitation program on lost work time , lost time cost , medical cost , and number of injuries in municipal employees . Seventy back-injured workers who participated in a 6-week back school  were compared on the dependent variables with 70 r and omly selected back-injured city employees who had not participated in a back school . Back school participants demonstrated a significant decrease on all dependent variables .  Back school participants had significantly fewer injuries in the 6-month postintervention period . No statistically significant differences were found between groups on the time and cost variables . Actual dollars saved in lost time and medical costs between groups was of practical value to the city . Study findings offer support for the back school as a cost-effective measure Study Design . A r and omized clinical trial . Objectives . To evaluate long-term clinical and economical effects of a light mobilization program on the duration of sick leave for patients with subacute low back pain . Summary of Background Data . Twelve-month follow-up results from a previous study showed that early intervention with examination at a spine clinic , giving the patients information , reassurance , and encouragement to engage in physical activity as normal as possible had significant effect in reducing sick leave . At 12-month follow-up , 68.4 % in the intervention group were off sick leave , as compared with 56.4 % in the control group . Patients in this study were followed-up for a period of 3 years to investigate possible long-term effects . Material s and Methods . Four hundred fifty-seven patients placed on a sick list for 8 to 12 weeks for low back pain were r and omized into two groups : an  intervention group ( n = 237 ) and a control group ( n = 220 ) . The intervention group was examined at a spine clinic and given information and advice to stay active . The control group was not examined at the clinic but was treated within the primary health care . Results . Over the 3 years of observation , the intervention group had significantly fewer days of sickness compensation ( average 125.7 d/person ) than the control group ( 169.6 d/person ) . This difference is mainly caused by a more rapid return to work during the first year . There was no significant difference for the second or third year . In particular , there is no increased risk for reoccurrence of illness from early return to work . At 6-month follow-up , patients in the intervention group were less likely to use bed rest and more likely to use stretching and walking to cope with their back pain compared with the control group . This effect diminished . At 12-month follow-up , the only significant difference between the groups was in the use of stretching . Economic returns of the intervention were calculated in terms of increases in the net present value of production for the society because of the reduction in number of days on sick leave . Net benefits accumulated over 3 years of treating the 237 patients in the intervention group amount to approximately $ 2,822 per person . Conclusions . For patients with subacute low back pain , a brief and simple early intervention with examination , information , reassurance , and encouragement to engage in physical activity as normal as possible had economic gains for the society . The effect occurred during the first year after intervention . There were no significant long-term effects of the intervention . The initial gain obtained during the first year does not lead to any increased costs or increased risks for reoccurrence of illness over the next 2 years Study Design . A prospect i ve cohort of approximately 1600 injured workers off work because of soft‐tissue musculoskeletal problems was followed for 1 year through a series of structured telephone interviews . Objective . To determine the effectiveness of a Workers ' Compensation Board‐sponsored early , active , exercise and education program based in the community in comparison to " usual " care . Summary of Background Data . The program established in 1990 was available in more than 100 clinics . Results from an earlier pilot study indicated lower overall cl aims costs for workers attending the program compared with non‐attenders . Methods . Subjects were recruited at the time of Workers ' Compensation Board cl aim registration . Routinely collected data and self‐reported responses to demographic , quality ‐of‐life , functional status , pain , recovery expectations , and workplace response to injury questions were used to determine selection factors for community clinic attendance . Economic and non‐economic outcomes were compared for clinic attenders and non‐attenders . Results . For the 885 male and female new back problem cases in the study , overall clinic attenders were not systematic ally different from non‐attenders at baseline . Analysis of duration of benefits showed no significant difference between attenders and non‐attenders , although health care costs for clinic attenders were significantly higher . Functional status , health‐related quality ‐of‐life , and pain measures all improved significantly throughout time for both groups , bit there were no statistically significant differences in rate of improvement . Conclusion . There was no advantage from the program compared with usual care on the outcomes measured‐a finding consistent with recent studies that examined the longer‐term effectiveness of other interventions in the first few weeks of back pain symptoms Introduction : Behaviorally oriented grade d activity interventions have been suggested for sick-listed workers with low back pain on return to work , but have not been extensively evaluated . Methods : One hundred and thirty-four workers were r and omly assigned to either a grade d activity intervention ( n = 67 ) or usual care ( n = 67 ) and followed-up for 12 months . Results : The grade d activity group returned back to work faster with a median of 54 days compared to 67 days in the usual care group . The grade d activity intervention was more effective after approximately 50 days post-r and omization ( HRR = 1.9 , CI = 1.2–3.1 , p = 0.01 ) . Differences between the groups in number of recurrent episodes , total number of days of sick leave due to low back pain , and total number of days of sick leave due to all diagnoses , were in favor of the grade d activity group , although not statistically significant . No effects of the grade d activity intervention were found for functional status or pain . Conclusion : Grade d activity intervention is a valuable strategy to enhance short-term return to work outcomes Study Design . Population ‐based r and omized clinical trial . Objectives . To develop and test a model of management of subacute back pain , to prevent prolonged disability . Summary of Background Data . The present management of back pain seems inadequate , and development of innovative models has been urged . Methods . A model for the treatment of subacute work‐related back pain has been developed and evaluated in a population ‐based r and omized clinical trial . Workers ( n = 130 ) from eligible workplaces in the Sherbrooke area ( N = 31 ) , who had been absent from work for more than 4 weeks for back pain , were r and omized , based on their workplace , in one of four treatment groups : usual care , clinical intervention , occupational intervention , and full intervention ( a combination of the last two ) . The duration of absence from regular work and from any work was evaluated using survival analysis . Functional status and pain were compared at study entry and after 1 year of follow‐up . Results . The full intervention group returned to regular work 2.41 times faster than the usual care intervention group ( 95 % confidence interval 1.19‐4. 
    Output:
    
However , effects were smaller in larger and better- quality studies , suggesting publication bias .
No intervention was clearly superior , although effort-intensive interventions were less effective than simple ones .
No cost-benefit analyses established statistically significant net economic benefits .