***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVES To study the feasibility and effectiveness of a  discharge planning intervention . DESIGN Quasi-experimental pre-post study design . SETTING General medicine wards at three hospitals : an academic medical center , a community teaching hospital , and a community-based nonteaching hospital . PARTICIPANTS All patients aged 65 and older admitted to the hospitalist services . INTERVENTION The intervention toolkit had five core elements : admission form with geriatric cues , facsimile to the primary care provider , interdisciplinary worksheet to identify barriers to discharge , pharmacist-physician collaborative medication reconciliation , and predischarge planning appointments . MEASUREMENTS Thirty-day readmission and return to emergency department rates and patient satisfaction with discharge . Odds ratios were determined , and site effects were examined accordig to interaction terms and Breslow Day statistics . RESULTS Two hundred thirty-seven patients were followed during the preintervention period , and 185 were exposed to the intervention . Patients characteristics were similar across the two time periods . The proportion of patients with high- quality transitions home , measured according to Coleman 's Care Transition Measures , increased from 68 % to 89 % ( odds ratio (OR)=3.49 , 95 % confidence interval (CI)=2.06 - 5.92 ) . Return to the emergency department within 3 days of discharge was lower in the intervention period ( 10 % vs 3 % , OR=0.25 , 95 % CI=0.10 - 0.62 ) . At 30 days , there was a lower rate of readmission ( 22 % vs 14 % , OR=0.59 , 95 % CI=0.34 - 0.97 ) and fewer visits to the emergency department ( 21 % vs 14 % , OR=0.61 , 95 % CI=0.36 - 1.03 ) ( P=.06 ) . CONCLUSION When hospitalized elderly patients are treated with consideration of their specific needs , healthcare outcomes can be improved Background : Hospital discharge is an interlace of care when patients are at a high risk of medication discrepancies as they transition from hospital to home . These discrepancies are important , as they may contribute to drug-related problems , medication errors , and adverse drug events . Objective : To Identify , characterize , and assess the clinical impact of unintentional medication discrepancies at hospital discharge . Methods : All consecutive general internal medicine patients admitted for at least 72 hours to a tertiary care teaching hospital were prospect ively assessed . Patients were excluded if they were discharged with verbal prescriptions ; died during hospitalization ; or transferred from or to a nursing home , another institution , or another unit within the same hospital . The primary endpoint was to determine the number of patients with at least one unintended medication discrepancy on hospital discharge . Medication discrepancies were assessed through comparison of a best possible medication discharge list with the actual discharge prescriptions . Secondary objectives were to characterize and assess the potential clinical impact of the unintentional discrepancies . Results : From March 14,2006 , to June 2,2006,430 patients were screened for eligibility ; 150 patients were included in the study . Overall , 106 ( 70.7 % ) patients had at least one actual or potential unintentional discrepancy . Sixty-two patients ( 41.3 % ) had at least one actual unintentional medication discrepancy al hospital discharge and 83 patients ( 55.3 % ) had at least one potential unintentional discrepancy . The most common unintentional discrepancies were an incomplete prescription requiring clarification , which could result in a patient delay in obtaining medications ( 49.5 % ) , and the omission of medications ( 22.9 % ) . Of the 105 unintentional discrepancies , 31 ( 29.5 % ) had the potential to cause possible or probable patient discomfort and /or clinical deterioration . Conclusions : Medication discrepancies occur commonly on hospital discharge . Underst and ing the type and frequency of discrepancies can help clinicians better underst and ways to prevent them . Structured medication reconciliation may help to prevent discharge medication discrepancies Objective Heart failure patients are regularly admitted to hospital and frequently use multiple medication . Besides intentional changes in pharmacotherapy , unintentional changes may occur during hospitalisation . The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a clinical pharmacist discharge service on medication discrepancies and prescription errors in patients with heart failure . Setting A general teaching hospital in Tilburg , the Netherl and s. Method An open r and omized intervention study was performed comparing an intervention group , with a  control group receiving regular care by doctors and nurses .  The clinical pharmacist discharge service consisted of review of discharge medication , communicating prescribing errors with the cardiologist , giving patients information , preparation of a written overview of the discharge medication and communication to both the community pharmacist and the general practitioner about this medication . Within 6 weeks after discharge all patients were routinely scheduled to visit the outpatient clinic and medication discrepancies were measured . Main outcome measure The primary endpoint was the frequency of prescription errors in the discharge medication and medication discrepancies after discharge combined . Results Forty-four patients were included in the control group and 41 in the intervention group . Sixty-eight percent of patients in the control group had at least one discrepancy or prescription error against 39 % in the intervention group ( RR 0.57 ( 95 % CI 0.37–0.88 ) ) . The percentage of medications with a discrepancy or prescription error in the control group was 14.6 % and in the intervention group it was 6.1 % ( RR 0.42 ( 95 % CI 0.27–0.66 ) ) . Conclusion This clinical pharmacist discharge service significantly reduces the risk of discrepancies and prescription errors in medication of patients with heart failure in the 1st month after discharge BACKGROUND Prior studies suggest that unintended medication discrepancies that represent errors are common at the time of hospital admission . These errors are particularly worthy of attention because they are not likely to be detected by computerized physician order entry systems . METHODS We prospect ively studied patients reporting the use of at least 4 regular prescription medications who were admitted to general internal medicine clinical teaching units . The primary outcome was unintended discrepancies ( errors ) between the physicians ' admission medication orders and a comprehensive medication history obtained through interview . We also evaluated the potential seriousness of these discrepancies . All discrepancies were review ed with the medical team to determine if they were intentional or unintentional . All unintended discrepancies were rated for their potential to cause patient harm . RESULTS After screening 523 admissions , 151 patients were enrolled based on the inclusion criteria . Eighty-one patients ( 53.6 % ; 95 % confidence interval , 45.7%-61.6 % ) had at least 1 unintended discrepancy . The most common error ( 46.4 % ) was omission of a regularly used medication . Most ( 61.4 % ) of the discrepancies were judged to have no potential to cause serious harm . However , 38.6 % of the discrepancies had the potential to cause moderate to severe discomfort or clinical deterioration . CONCLUSIONS Medication errors at the time of hospital admission are common , and some have the potential to cause harm . Better methods of ensuring an accurate medication history at the time of hospital admission are needed BACKGROUND Hospitalization and subsequent discharge home often involve discontinuity of care , multiple changes in medication regimens , and inadequate patient education , which can lead to adverse drug events ( ADEs ) and avoidable health care utilization . Our objectives were to identify drug-related problems during and after hospitalization and to determine the effect of patient counseling and follow-up by pharmacists on preventable ADEs . METHODS We conducted a r and omized trial of 178 patients being discharged home from the general medicine service at a large teaching hospital . Patients in the intervention group received pharmacist counseling at discharge and a follow-up telephone call 3 to 5 days later . Interventions focused on clarifying medication regimens ; review ing indications , directions , and potential side effects of medications ; screening for barriers to adherence and early side effects ; and providing patient counseling and /or physician feedback when appropriate . The primary outcome was rate of preventable ADEs . RESULTS Pharmacists observed the following drug-related problems in the intervention group : unexplained discrepancies between patients ' preadmission medication regimens and discharge medication orders in 49 % of patients , unexplained discrepancies between discharge medication lists and postdischarge regimens in 29 % of patients , and medication nonadherence in 23 % . Comparing trial outcomes 30 days after discharge , preventable ADEs were detected in 11 % of patients in the control group and 1 % of patients in the intervention group ( P = .01 ) . No differences were found between groups in total ADEs or total health care utilization . CONCLUSIONS Pharmacist medication review , patient counseling , and telephone follow-up were associated with a lower rate of preventable ADEs 30 days after hospital discharge . Medication discrepancies before and after discharge were common targets of intervention Purpose To examine the impact of systematic medication reconciliations upon hospital admission and of a medication review while in hospital on the number of inappropriate medications and unscheduled drug-related hospital revisits in elderly patients . Methods This was a prospect i ve , controlled study in 210 patients , aged 65 years or older , who were admitted to one of three internal medicine wards at a University Hospital in Sweden . Intervention patients received the complete Lund Integrated Medicines Management model ( medication reconciliation upon admission and discharge , and medication review and monitoring ) provided by a multi-professional team , including a clinical pharmacist . Control patients received st and ard care and medication reconciliation upon discharge . Blinded review ers evaluated the appropriateness of the prescribing ( using the Medication Appropriateness Index ) on admission and discharge , and assessed the probability that a drug-related problem was the reason for any patient readmitted to hospital or visiting the emergency department within 3 months of discharge ( using World Health Organisation causality criteria ) . Results There was a greater decrease in the number of inappropriate drugs in the intervention group than in the control group for both the intention-to-treat population { 51 % [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 43–58 % ] vs. 39 % ( 95 % CI 30–48 % ) ; p = 0.0446 } and the per- protocol population [ 60 % ( 95 % CI 51–67 % ) vs. 44 % ( 95 % CI 34–52 % ) ; p = 0.0106 ) ] . There were six revisits to hospital in the intervention group which were judged as ‘ possibly , probably or certainly drug-related ’ , compared with 12 in the control group ( p = 0.0469 ) . Conclusions In this study , medication reconciliation and review provided by a clinical pharmacist in a multi-professional team significantly reduced the number of inappropriate drugs and unscheduled drug-related hospital revisits among elderly patients Purpose To study differences in outcomes of medication reconciliation ( MR ) when performed by clinical pharmacists compared to nurses . Methods 201 patients ( 21–92 years ) admitted to the Department of Cardiology at the University Hospital of North Norway , autumn 2012 , were r and omized into a pharmacist group ( PG ) and a nurse group ( NG ) . The nurses and the pharmacists were trained for performing the MR process by an independent clinical pharmacist . Medication discrepancies ( MDs ) were discussed with the physicians . Time spent during the MR was recorded . An independent expert group rated clinical relevance of the MDs retrospectively . Results At least one MD was identified in 78 % and 84 % of patients in PG and NG , respectively ( P = 0.269 ) with a mean number of MDs per patient 3.1 ( SD 2.1 ) and 2.8 ( SD 2.2 ) , respectively ( P = 0.528 ) . Mean time spent/patient on the MR process was 22.9 min ( SD 11.6 ) in the PG and 32.2 min ( SD 20.3 ) in the NG ( P < 0,001 ) . Physicians agreed significantly more often to act upon the MDs presented by pharmacists compared to nurses ( P = 0.001 ) . The expert group finally assessed 48 % and 49 % of the MDs to be of the clinical relevance in the PG and the NG , respectively . Conclusions By applying a structured method for MR , a small however not statistically significant difference in identified MDs between nurses and clinical pharmacists was revealed . The pharmacists spent significantly less time than the nurses , and physicians agreed significantly more often with the pharmacist that action should be taken on the MDs . This is important in the discussion of who to perform MR Background Potential adverse drug events ( PADEs ) are defined as being potentially harmful unintentional medication discrepancies . Discrepancies regarding medication history ( MH ) often occur when a patient is being admitted to a hospital ’s emergency department ( ED ) ; they are clinical ly important and represent a significant source of data regarding adverse drug events occurring during emergency admission to hospital . This study sought to measure the impact of pharmacist-acquired MH during admission to an ED ; it focused on whether a patient ’s current home medication regimen being available for a doctor when consulting a patient in an ED would have reduced potential adverse drug events . Method A multicentre , double-blind , r and omised , controlled parallel-group study was carried out 
    Output:
    
CONCLUSION Pharmacists-led interventions were effective in reducing medication discrepancies .
However , these interventions did not lead to a significant reduction in potential and preventable ADEs and healthcare utilization