***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Study Design . A r and omized trial . Objective . To evaluate the effectiveness of a semi-intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with chronic low back pain in an outpatient setting . Summary and Background Data . Systematic review s have shown that there is strong evidence that intensive multidisciplinary treatment ( > 100 hours ) , which includes functional restoration , improves function among chronic patients with low back pain , and moderate evidence that it reduces pain but contradictory evidence regarding improvement of working ability . However , there is paucity of data whether semi-intensive outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation in groups is more effective than individual physiotherapy . Material s and Methods . A total of 120 women employed as healthcare and social care professionals with nonspecific chronic low back pain were recruited from two occupational healthcare centers . The patients were r and omized into two intervention programs . Multidisciplinary rehabilitation ( n = 59 ) was conducted in groups and comprised of physical training , workplace interventions , back school , relaxation training , and cognitive-behavioral stress management methods for 70 hours . The individual physiotherapy ( n = 61 ) included physical exercise and passive treatment methods administered for 10 hours . Main outcome measures were : back pain and sciatic pain intensity , disability , sick leaves , healthcare consumption , symptoms of depression , and beliefs of working ability after 2 years . Results . There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in main outcome measures just after rehabilitation , at 6- , at 12- , or 24-month follow-up . In both intervention arms , however , the before- and -after comparison showed favorable effects , and the effects were still maintained at 2 years follow-up . Conclusions . The results of this study indicate that semilight outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for female chronic low back pain patients does not offer incremental benefits when compared with rehabilitation carried out by a physiotherapist having a cognitive-behavioral way of administering the treatment Study Design . A prospect i ve r and omized controlled trial . Objectives . To examine the effectiveness of combined manipulative treatment , stabilizing exercises , and physician consultation compared with physician consultation alone for chronic low back pain . Summary of Background Data . Strong evidence exists that manual therapy provides more effective short-term pain relief than does placebo treatment in the management of chronic low back pain . The evidence for long-term effect is lacking . Methods . Two hundred four chronic low back pain patients , whose Oswestry disability index was at least 16 % , were r and omly assigned to either a manipulative-treatment group or a consultation group . All were clinical ly examined , informed about their back pain , provided with an educational booklet , and were given specific instructions based on the clinical evaluation . The treatment included four sessions of manipulation and stabilizing exercises aim ing to correct the lumbopelvic rhythm . Question naires inquired about pain intensity , self-rated disability , mental depression , health-related quality of life , health care costs , and production costs . Results . At the baseline , the groups were comparable , except for the percentage of employees ( P = 0.01 ) . At the 5- and 12-month follow-ups , the manipulative-treatment group showed more significant reductions in pain intensity ( P < 0.001 ) and in self-rated disability ( P = 0.002 ) than the consultation group . However , we detected no significant difference between the groups in health-related quality of life or in costs . Conclusions . The manipulative treatment with stabilizing exercises was more effective in reducing pain intensity and disability than the physician consultation alone . The present study showed that short , specific treatment programs with proper patient information may alter the course of chronic low back pain OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of the addition of back school to exercise and physical treatment modalities in relieving pain and improving the functional status of patients with chronic low back pain . DESIGN A r and omized controlled trial . PATIENTS A total of 146 patients with chronic low back pain were enrolled in the study . METHODS Subjects were divided into 2 groups : the back school group received exercise , physical treatment modalities and a back school programme ; and the control group received exercise and physical treatment modalities .  Treatment efficacy was evaluated at the end of treatment and 3 months post-treatment , in terms of pain , measured with the Visual Analogue Scale , and functional status , measured with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire . RESULTS In both groups , Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire were significantly reduced after therapy ( p < 0.01 ) , but the difference between the scores at the end of treatment and 3 months post-treatment was not significant . There was a significant improvement in Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire in the back school group compared with the control group at the end of therapy and 3 months post-treatment ( p < 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION The addition of back school was more effective than exercise and physical treatment modalities alone in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain Study Design . A r and omized controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up period was conducted . Objective . To compare lumbar extension exercise and whole-body vibration exercise for chronic lower back pain . Summary of Background Data . Chronic lower back pain involves muscular as well as connective and neural systems . Different types of physiotherapy are applied for its treatment . Industrial vibration is regarded as a risk factor . Recently , vibration exercise has been developed as a new type of physiotherapy . It is thought to activate muscles via reflexes . Methods . In this study , 60 patients with chronic lower back pain devoid of “ specific ” spine diseases , who had a mean age of 51.7 years and a pain history of 13.1 years , practice d either isodynamic lumbar extension or vibration exercise for 3 months . Outcome measures were lumbar extension torque , pain sensation ( visual analog scale ) , and pain-related disability ( pain disability index ) . Results . A significant and comparable reduction in pain sensation and pain-related disability was observed in both groups . Lumbar extension torque increased significantly in the vibration exercise group ( 30.1 Nm/kg ) , but significantly more in the lumbar extension group ( + 59.2 Nm/kg ; SEM 10.2;P < 0.05 ) . No correlation was found between gain in lumbar torque and pain relief or pain-related disability ( P > 0.2 ) . Conclusions . The current data indicate that poor lumbar muscle force probably is not the exclusive cause of chronic lower back pain . Different types of exercise therapy tend to yield comparable results . Interestingly , well-controlled vibration may be the cure rather than the cause of lower back pain Background The evidence that exercise intervention is effective for treatment of chronic low back pain comes from trials that are not placebo-controlled . Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of motor control exercise for people with chronic low back pain . Design This was a r and omized , placebo-controlled trial . Setting The study was conducted in an outpatient physical therapy department in Australia . Patients The participants were 154 patients with chronic low back pain of more than 12 weeks ’ duration . Intervention Twelve sessions of motor control exercise ( ie , exercises design ed to improve function of specific muscles of the low back region and the control of posture and movement ) or placebo ( ie , detuned ultrasound therapy and detuned short-wave therapy ) were conducted over 8 weeks . Measurements Primary outcomes were pain intensity , activity ( measured by the Patient-Specific Functional Scale ) , and patient 's global impression of recovery measured at 2 months . Secondary outcomes were pain ; activity ( measured by the Patient-Specific Functional Scale ) ; patient 's global impression of recovery measured at 6 and 12 months ; activity limitation ( measured by the Rol and -Morris Disability Question naire ) at 2 , 6 , and 12 months ; and risk of persistent or recurrent pain at 12 months . Results The exercise intervention  improved activity and patient 's global impression of recovery but did not clearly reduce pain at 2 months . The mean effect of exercise on activity ( measured by the Patient-Specific Functional Scale ) was 1.1 points ( 95 % confidence interval [CI]=0.3 to 1.8 ) , the mean effect on global impression of recovery was 1.5 points ( 95 % CI=0.4 to 2.5 ) , and the mean effect on pain was 0.9 points ( 95 % CI=−0.01 to 1.8 ) , all measured on 11-point scales . Secondary outcomes also favored motor control exercise . Limitation Clinicians could not be blinded to the intervention they provided . Conclusions Motor control exercise produced short-term improvements in global impression of recovery and activity , but not pain , for people with chronic low back pain . Most of the effects observed in the short term were maintained at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups Prospect i ve inception cohort . To assess the prognostic value of spinal mechanical load , assessed with the 24-hour schedule ( 24HS ) , in subjects with acute non-specific low back pain ( ALBP ) and to examine the influence of spinal mechanical load on the course of ALBP . In view of the characteristics of the natural course of ALBP , this should be viewed as a persistent condition in many patients rather that a benign self-limiting disease . Therefore , secondary prevention could be beneficial . Spinal mechanical load is a risk factor for ALBP and possibly a ( modifiable ) prognostic factor for persistent ( i.e. recurrent and /or chronic ) LBP . One hundred patients from primary care with ALBP were eligible for inclusion . At 6 months , 88 subjects completed the follow-up . For the follow-up assessment a research assistant , unaware of our interest in the prognostic factors , contacted the subjects by telephone . Question naires were completed focusing on changes in demographic data and on the course and current status of ALBP . Persistent LBP occurred in 60 % subjects . After multivariate regression analysis smoking ( harmful ) and advanced age ( protective ) were associated with persistent LBP . Differences in 24HS scores at baseline and follow-up were univariate-related to persistent LBP . Spinal mechanical load , quantified with the 24HS , is not a prognostic factor for persistent LBP . Modification of spinal mechanical load in terms of 24HS scores could be beneficial for secondary prevention in patients with acute LBP Study Design . A r and omized controlled design superimposed on treatment as usual was used to compare the effects of a cognitive-behavior intervention aim ed at preventing chronicity with two different forms of information . Objective . To develop a coping-oriented preventive intervention applicable in primary care , and to compare its impact with educational information . Summary of Background Data . Preventing long-term disability result ing from spinal pain has proved difficult . The information provided by health care professions and early interventions aim ed at preventing long-term disability may be important , but little scientific evidence exists concerning their use . Methods . A protocol for a six-session cognitive-behavior group intervention was developed on the basis of earlier research . The main focus was to prevent long-term disability by changing patients ’ behaviors and beliefs so they can cope better with their problems . Comparison groups received either a pamphlet shown earlier to have an effect , or a more extensive information package consisting of six installments . All the groups continued to receive treatment as usual in primary care . There were 243 patients with acute or subacute spinal pain who perceived that they were at risk for developing a chronic problem . These patients were r and omized to the cognitive-behavioral intervention or one of the two information groups . Because the aim was to prevent long-term disability , the key outcome variables at the 1-year follow-up assessment were sick absenteeism and health care use . Other variables were pain , function , fear-avoidance beliefs , and cognitions . Results . The comparison groups reported benefits . However , the risk for a long-term sick absence developing was lowered ninefold for the cognitive-behavior intervention group as compared with the risk for the information groups ( relative risk , 9.3 ) . Participants in the cognitive-behavior group also reported a significant decrease in perceived risk . In addition , the cognitive-behavior group demonstrated a significant decrease in physician and physical therapy use as compared with two groups receiving information , in which such use increased . All three groups tended to improve on the variables of pain , fear-avoidance , and cognitions . Conclusions . This study demonstrates that a cognitive-behavior group intervention can lower the risk of a long-term disability developing . These findings underscore the significance of early interventions that specifically aim to prevent chronic problems . This approach might be applied to primary care setting Objective : This article examines the effectiveness of manual therapy with specific adjuvant exercise for treating  chronic low back pain and disability .  Methods : A single blind , r and omized , controlled trial was employed . Patients were prescribed an exercise program that was tailored to treat their musculoskeletal dysfunctions or given a nonspecific program of general stretching and aerobic conditioning . In addition , patients received manual therapy or sham manual therapy . Participants were seen for 6 weekly sessions and were asked to perform their exercise program twice daily . Results : Seventy-two out of 100 patients completed the study . Multivariate tests conducted for measures of pain and disability revealed a significant group by time interaction ( P = 0.04 and P = 0.05 , respectively ) , indicating differential change in these measures pretreatment to posttreatment as a function of the treatment received . When controlling for pretreatment scores , patients receiving manual therapy with specific adjuvant exercise reported significant reductions in pain . No change in perceived disability was observed , with the exception that patients receiving sham manual therapy with specific adjuvant exercise reported significantly greater disability at posttreatment . Discussion : Manual therapy with specific adjuvant exercise appears to be beneficial in treating  chronic low back pain .  Despite changes in pain , perceived function did not improve . It is possible that impacting chronic low back pain alone does not address psychosocial or other factors that may contribute to disability . Further studies are needed to examine the long-term effects of these interventions and to address what adjuncts are beneficial in improving function in this population 
    Output:
    
Conclusions The clinical course of LBP symptoms followed a pattern that was similar in RCTs and cohort observational studies .