***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND Treatments for small-cell lung cancer ( SCLC ) after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy are limited . We assessed safety and activity of nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with SCLC who progressed after one or more previous regimens . METHODS The SCLC cohort of this phase 1/2 multicentre , multi-arm , open-label trial was conducted at 23 sites ( academic centres and hospitals ) in six countries . Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older , had limited-stage or extensive-stage SCLC , and had disease progression after at least one previous platinum-containing regimen . Patients received nivolumab ( 3 mg/kg bodyweight intravenously ) every 2 weeks ( given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity ) , or nivolumab plus ipilimumab ( 1 mg/kg plus 1 mg/kg , 1 mg/kg plus 3 mg/kg , or 3 mg/kg plus 1 mg/kg , intravenously ) every 3 weeks for four cycles , followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks . Patients were either assigned to nivolumab monotherapy or assessed in a dose-escalating safety phase for the nivolumab/ipilimumab combination beginning at nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg . Depending on tolerability , patients were then assigned to nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg or nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg . The primary endpoint was objective response by investigator assessment . All analyses included patients who were enrolled at least 90 days before data base lock . This trial is ongoing ; here , we report an interim analysis of the SCLC cohort . This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT01928394 . FINDINGS Between Nov 18 , 2013 , and July 28 , 2015 , 216 patients were enrolled and treated ( 98 with nivolumab 3 mg/kg , three with nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg , 61 with nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg , and 54 with nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg ) . At data base lock on Nov 6 , 2015 , median follow-up for patients continuing in the study ( including those who had died or discontinued treatment ) was 198·5 days ( IQR 163·0 - 464·0 ) for nivolumab 3 mg/kg , 302 days ( IQR not calculable ) for nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg , 361·0 days ( 273·0 - 470·0 ) for nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg , and 260·5 days ( 248·0 - 288·0 ) for nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg . An objective response was achieved in ten ( 10 % ) of 98 patients  receiving nivolumab 3 mg/kg , one ( 33 % ) of three patients receiving nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg , 14 ( 23 % ) of 61 receiving nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg , and ten ( 19 % ) of 54 receiving nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg . Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13 ( 13 % ) patients in the nivolumab 3 mg/kg cohort , 18 ( 30 % ) in the nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg cohort , and ten ( 19 % ) in the nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg cohort ; the most commonly reported grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were increased lipase ( none vs 5 [ 8 % ] vs none ) and diarrhoea ( none vs 3 [ 5 % ] vs 1 [ 2 % ] ) . No patients in the nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg cohort had a grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event . Six ( 6 % ) patients in the nivolumab 3 mg/kg group , seven ( 11 % ) in the nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg group , and four ( 7 % ) in the nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg group discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events . Two patients who received nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg died from treatment-related adverse events ( myasthenia gravis and worsening of renal failure ) , and one patient who received nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg died from treatment-related pneumonitis . INTERPRETATION Nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed antitumour activity with durable responses and manageable safety profiles in previously treated patients with SCLC . These data suggest a potential new treatment approach for a population of patients with limited treatment options and support the evaluation of nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in phase 3 r and omised controlled trials in SCLC . FUNDING Bristol-Myers Squibb BACKGROUND Limited evidence exists to show that adding a third agent to platinum-doublet chemotherapy improves efficacy in the first-line advanced non-small-cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) setting . The anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab has shown efficacy as monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC and has a non-overlapping toxicity profile with chemotherapy . We assessed whether the addition of pembrolizumab to platinum-doublet chemotherapy improves efficacy in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC . METHODS In this r and omised , open-label , phase 2 cohort of a multicohort study ( KEYNOTE-021 ) , patients were enrolled at 26 medical centres in the USA and Taiwan . Patients with chemotherapy-naive , stage IIIB or IV , non-squamous NSCLC without targetable EGFR or ALK genetic aberrations were r and omly assigned ( 1:1 ) in blocks of four stratified by PD-L1 tumour proportion score ( < 1 % vs ≥1 % ) using an interactive voice-response system to 4 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg plus carboplatin area under curve 5 mg/mL per min and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks followed by pembrolizumab for 24 months and indefinite pemetrexed maintenance therapy or to 4 cycles of carboplatin and pemetrexed alone followed by indefinite pemetrexed maintenance therapy . The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response , defined as the percentage of patients with radiologically confirmed complete or partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 assessed by masked , independent central review , in the intention-to-treat population , defined as all patients who were allocated to study treatment . Significance threshold was p<0·025 ( one sided ) . Safety was assessed in the as-treated population , defined as all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study treatment . This trial , which is closed for enrolment but continuing for follow-up , is registered with Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT02039674 . FINDINGS Between Nov 25 , 2014 , and Jan 25 , 2016 , 123 patients were enrolled ; 60 were r and omly assigned to the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 63 to the chemotherapy alone group . 33 ( 55 % ; 95 % CI 42 - 68 ) of 60 patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group achieved an objective response compared with 18 ( 29 % ; 18 - 41 ) of 63 patients in the chemotherapy alone group ( estimated treatment difference 26 % [ 95 % CI 9 - 42 % ] ; p=0·0016 ) . The incidence of grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events was similar between groups ( 23 [ 39 % ] of 59 patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 16 [ 26 % ] of 62 in the chemotherapy alone group ) . The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group were anaemia ( seven [ 12 % ] of 59 ) and decreased neutrophil count ( three [ 5 % ] ) ; an additional six events each occurred in two ( 3 % ) for acute kidney injury , decreased lymphocyte count , fatigue , neutropenia , and sepsis , and thrombocytopenia . In the chemotherapy alone group , the most common grade 3 or worse events were anaemia ( nine [ 15 % ] of 62 ) and decreased neutrophil count , pancytopenia , and thrombocytopenia ( two [ 3 % ] each ) . One ( 2 % ) of 59 patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group experienced treatment-related death because of sepsis compared with two ( 3 % ) of 62 patients in the chemotherapy group : one because of sepsis and one because of pancytopenia . INTERPRETATION Combination of pembrolizumab , carboplatin , and pemetrexed could be an effective and tolerable first-line treatment option for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC . This finding is being further explored in an ongoing international , r and omised , double-blind , phase 3 study . FUNDING Merck & BACKGROUND Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed promising efficacy for the treatment of non – small‐cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) in a phase 1 trial , and tumor mutational burden has emerged as a potential biomarker of benefit . In this part of an open‐label , multipart , phase 3 trial , we examined progression‐free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy among patients with a high tumor mutational burden ( ≥10 mutations per megabase ) . METHODS We enrolled patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC that was not previously treated with chemotherapy . Those with a level of tumor programmed death lig and 1 ( PD‐L1 ) expression of at least 1 % were r and omly assigned , in a 1:1:1 ratio , to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab , nivolumab monotherapy , or chemotherapy ; those with a tumor PD‐L1 expression level of less than 1 % were r and omly assigned , in a 1:1:1 ratio , to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab , nivolumab plus chemotherapy , or chemotherapy .  Tumor mutational burden was determined by the FoundationOne CDx assay . RESULTS Progression‐free survival among patients with a high tumor mutational burden was significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy . The 1‐year progression‐free survival rate was 42.6 % with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 13.2 % with chemotherapy , and the median progression‐free survival was 7.2 months ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 5.5 to 13.2 ) versus 5.5 months ( 95 % CI , 4.4 to 5.8 ) ( hazard ratio for disease progression or death , 0.58 ; 97.5 % CI , 0.41 to 0.81 ; P<0.001 ) . The objective response rate was 45.3 % with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 26.9 % with chemotherapy . The benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy was broadly consistent within subgroups , including patients with a PD‐L1 expression level of at least 1 % and those with a level of less than 1 % . The rate of grade 3 or 4 treatment‐related adverse events was 31.2 % with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 36.1 % with chemotherapy . CONCLUSIONS Progression‐free survival was significantly longer with first‐line nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients with NSCLC and a high tumor mutational burden , irrespective of PD‐L1 expression level . The results vali date the benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in NSCLC and the role of tumor mutational burden as a biomarker for patient selection . ( Funded by Bristol‐Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical ; CheckMate 227 Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT02477826 . BACKGROUND Nivolumab has shown improved survival in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) previously treated with chemotherapy . We assessed the safety and activity of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy for NSCLC . METHODS The open-label , phase 1 , multicohort study ( CheckMate 012 ) cohorts reported here were enrolled at 
    Output:
    
Data suggested that PD-1 inhibitors had higher efficacy and safety profiles than PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors in combination ICI therapy for lung cancer patients .
However , the current data do not support the large-scale clinical application of combination ICI therapy in SCLC patients