***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: A newly marketed vaginal sponge intended to support the urethra was tested during aerobic exercise in a group of 6 women suffering from stress urinary incontinence . The patients performed half an hour of aerobic exercises on 2 consecutive days , with and without the vaginal sponge . A pad was worn during exercise and weighed before and after . Without the vaginal sponge the patients had a mean loss of 7 g ( range 2–18 g ) during exercise . With the vaginal sponge in situ there was no leakage . The sponge can be recommended for use during sports in patients with mild to moderate incontinence Objective To compare two versions of the same type of disposable intravaginal device ( the Conveen Continence Guard , CCG , and the Contrelle Continence Tampon , CCT , Coloplast a/s , Humlebæk , Denmark ) for treating stress incontinence in women 
    Output:
    
Two small trials compared a mechanical device with no treatment and although they suggested that use of a mechanical device might be better than no treatment , the evidence for this was inconclusive .
While at three months , there were more withdrawals from the device-only group , at 12 months group differences between the groups were not sustained on any measure .
The place of mechanical devices in the management of urinary incontinence remains in question .
There was also insufficient evidence in favour of one device over another and little evidence to compare mechanical devices with other forms of treatment