***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical effects of laterally wedged insoles and neutrally wedged insoles ( used as control ) in patients with medial femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) . DESIGN 6-month prospect i ve r and omized controlled study . PATIENTS out patients with painful medial femoro-tibial knee OA . OUTCOME MEASURES patient 's overall assessment of disease activity ( 5 grade scale ) , WOMAC index subscales and concomitant treatments . STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Performed as an intention-to-treat analysis . Main criterion : improvement in the patient 's assessment of activity ( defined as a reduction of 1 grade or more at month 6 compared to baseline , and no intraarticular injection or lavage during the study ) . Secondary criteria for assessment : ( a ) improvement in the patient 's assessment of activity at months 1 and 3 compared to baseline , ( b ) improvement in the WOMAC subscales at months 1 , 3 and 6 , compared to baseline ( defined as an improvement of at least 30 % , and no intraarticular injection or lavage during the study ) and ( c ) concomitant therapies ( analgesics and NSAIDs ) . RESULTS The baseline characteristics of the 156 recruited patients ( 41 males , 115 females , mean age 64.8 years ) were not different in the two treatment groups . At months 1 , 3 and 6 the percentages of patients with improvement in assessment of disease activity , in WOMAC pain , joint stiffness , and physical functioning subscales were similar in the two groups . The number of days with NSAIDs intake during the previous 3 months was decreased at month 6 compared with baseline in the group furnished with laterally wedged insoles ( 14.1 days+/-28 vs 9.9 days+/-27 , P=0.04 , Wilcoxon paired test ) , while it remained unchanged in the other group ( 15.5 days+/-24 vs 15+/-28 , P=0.56 ) . Compliance and tolerance were satisfactory . Compliance was different between the two groups at month 6 , with a greater frequency of patients who wore insoles permanently in the laterally wedged insole group than in the other group ( 87.8 % vs 74.3%;P=0.032 ) . CONCLUSION This study failed to demonstrate a relevant short-term symptomatic effect of laterally-wedged insoles in medial femoro-tibial OA . However , the decrease in NSAIDs consumption together with better compliance in the treated group are in favor of a beneficial effect of laterally-wedged insoles in medial femoro-tibial OA OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of an insole with subtalar strapping on patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis ( OA ) of the knee . METHODS Novel lateral wedged insoles with elastic subtalar strapping ( the subtalar strapping support group ) and ankle supporters with a lateral wedged heel insert ( the sock-type ankle support group ) were prepared . Eighty-eight female out patients with knee OA were treated with 1 of the 2 insoles for 8 weeks . Femorotibial angle was assessed by st and ing radiographs with and without unilateral insole use for each subject . Symptoms of knee OA were evaluated according to the severity index of Lequesne et al at baseline and at the final assessment . RESULTS Participants wearing the insole with subtalar strapping ( n = 42 ) demonstrated significantly decreased femorotibial angle ( an average of change : -3.1 degrees + /- 2.5 degrees , P < 0.0001 ) , but a significant difference was not found in the sock-type ankle support group ( n = 46 ; -0.4 degrees + /- 1.1 degrees , P > 0.05 ) . In the subtalar strapping support group , pain during bed rest with full extension of the knee ( P < 0.0001 ) , pain after getting up ( P = 0.04 ) , pain on getting up from a seated position ( P = 0.021 ) , maximum distance walked ( P = 0.009 ) , and aggregate severity score ( P < 0.0001 ) were significantly improved compared with baseline . In contrast , significant symptomatic improvement was detected only in the aggregate score ( P = 0.016 ) in the sock-type ankle support group , but not in any of the 10 specific categories . CONCLUSION The lateral wedged insole with subtalar strapping induces correction of the femorotibial angle and symptomatic relief in patients with varus-deformity knee OA OBJECTIVE To assess the optimal duration of daily wear for a laterally wedged insole with subtalar strapping in subjects with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee ( knee OA ) . DESIGN The setting was an outpatient clinic . Eighty-one patients with knee OA were prospect ively r and omized according to birth date and to either 2 weeks of treatment with a lateral wedge with subtalar strapping for less than 5 h ( the short group ) , 5 - 10 h ( the medium group ) or greater than 10 h ( the long group ) each day , or to treatment with a subtalar strapping b and without lateral wedge ( the placebo group ) . St and ing radiographs were used to analyze the femorotibial angle for each subject , both with and without their respective orthotic device . The remission scores of Lequesne index were compared among the four groups at the conclusion . RESULTS The short ( n=21 ) , medium ( n=20 ) and long ( n=18 ) groups demonstrated a significant greater valgus correction of the femorotibial angle than the placebo group ( n=22 ) ( P<0.0001 ) . The remission score was significantly improved in the medium group compared to the placebo ( P=0.001 ) and long ( P=0.001 ) groups . CONCLUSIONS An optimal duration of insole with subtalar strapping wear for patients with varus deformity knee OA may be between 5 and 10 h each day Objective To assess the effect of lateral wedge insoles compared with flat control insoles on improving symptoms and slowing structural disease progression in medial knee osteoarthritis . Design R and omised controlled trial . Setting Community in Melbourne , Australia . Participants 200 people aged 50 or more with clinical and radiographic diagnosis of mild to moderately severe medial knee osteoarthritis . Interventions Full length 5 degree lateral wedged insoles or flat control insoles worn inside the shoes daily for 12 months . Main outcome measures Primary symptomatic outcome was change in overall knee pain ( past week ) measured on an 11 point numerical rating scale . Primary structural outcome was change in volume of medial tibial cartilage from magnetic resonance imaging scans . Secondary clinical outcomes included changes in measures of pain , function , stiffness , and health related quality of life . Secondary structural outcomes included progression of medial cartilage defects and bone marrow lesions . Results Between group differences did not differ significantly for the primary outcomes of change in overall pain ( −0.3 points , 95 % confidence intervals −1.0 to 0.3 ) and change in medial tibial cartilage volume ( −0.4 mm3 , 95 % confidence interval −15.4 to 14.6 ) , and confidence intervals did not include minimal clinical ly important differences . None of the changes in secondary outcomes showed differences between groups . Conclusion Lateral wedge insoles worn for 12 months provided no symptomatic or structural benefits compared with flat control insoles . Trial registration Australian New Zeal and Clinical Trials Registry ACTR12605000503628 and Clinical Trials.gov NCT00415259 The purpose of the study was to examine the clinical efficacy of individually prescribed laterally wedged orthoses and walking shoes in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis using a prospect i ve , single-blind , block-r and omized controlled design . Sixty-six subjects ( 29 males , 37 females , mean age 62.4 years , mean BMI 33.0 kg/m(2 ) ) were  block-r and omized to a lateral wedge ( treatment ) or neutral ( control ) orthotic group . Both groups were issued a st and ardized walking shoe for use with the orthoses . Primary outcome measures included the pain , stiffness , and functional limitations subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index . Secondary outcome measures included the 6-minute walk distance and pain change , and stair negotiation time and pain change . A significant interaction ( p=0.039 ) favoring the treatment group was observed for pain change during the 6-minute walk . The treatment group demonstrated significant improvements at both 1 month ( p<0.001 ) and 1 year ( p<0.001 ) compared to baseline . The control group only demonstrated significant improvements at 1 year ( p=0.017 ) . No other interactions were observed . Both groups were improved at each follow-up in the WOMAC subscales for pain ( p<0.001 ) , stiffness ( p<0.001 ) , and physical function ( p<0.001 ) . Both groups also improved in 6-minute walk test distance ( p<0.001 ) , stair negotiation test time ( p=0.004 ) , and stair negotiation test pain change ( p<0.001 ) . The results suggest that both neutral and laterally wedged orthoses may be beneficial in the management of medial knee osteoarthritis when used with walking shoes . However , the addition of lateral wedging was associated with early improvements in 6-minute walk test pain change not seen in the control group OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical effects of laterally wedged insoles and neutrally wedged insoles ( used as control ) in patients with medial femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis . METHODS STUDY DESIGN 24-month prospect i ve r and omized controlled study . PATIENTS Out patients with painful medial femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis . OUTCOME MEASURES Patient 's overall assessment of disease activity ( 5 grade scale ) , WOMAC index subscales and concomitant treatments . STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Performed as an intention-to-treat analysis , with the last observation carried forward ( LOCF ) . Main symptomatic criterion : Improvement in the patient 's assessment of activity ( defined as a reduction of one grade or more at the end of the study as compared to baseline , and no intra-articular injection or lavage during the 6 months previous to the last visit ) . Secondary criteria for assessment : ( a ) Changes in the WOMAC subscales at month 24 , and ( b ) concomitant therapies ( analgesics , NSAIDs and intra-articular injections or lavages ) . Structural criterion : Joint space width ( JSW ) at the narrowest point . Non-compliance was defined as intermittent or lack of insole fitting at two consecutive visits . Compliance within groups was compared by using a life table analysis technique ( Log-Rank ) . RESULTS The baseline characteristics of the 156 recruited patients ( 41 males , 115 females , mean age 64.8 years ) were not different in the 2 treatment groups . At year 2 , there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups concerning the percentages of patients with improvement in both global assessment of disease activity and in WOMAC subscales ( pain , stiffness , function ) . The number of days with NSAIDs intake was lower in the group with laterally wedged insoles than in the neutrally wedged group ( 71+/-173 days vs. 127+/-193 days , P=0.003 , Mann-Whitney test ) . The mean joint space narrowing rate did not differ between the two groups : 0.21+/-0.59 mm/year in the laterally wedged group vs 0.12+/-0.32 mm/year in the neutrally wedged group . Compliance and tolerance were satisfactory . Compliance was different between the 2 groups at month 24 , with a greater frequency of patients who wore insoles permanently in the laterally wedged insole group than in the other group ( 85.8 % vs 71.9 % , P=0.023 ) . CONCLUSION This study failed to demonstrate a relevant symptomatic and /or structural effect of laterally-wedged insoles in medial femoro-tibial OA . However , the reduced NSAIDs intake and the better compliance in the treatment group are in favor of a beneficial effect of laterally-wedged insoles in medial femoro-tibial OA BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare a custom-made valgus-producing functional knee ( unloader ) brace , a neoprene sleeve , and medical treatment only ( control group ) with regard to their ability to improve the disease-specific quality of life and the functional status of patients who had osteoarthritis in association with a varus deformity of the knee ( varus gonarthrosis ) . METHODS The study design was a prospect i ve , parallel-group , r and omized clinical trial . Patients who had varus gonarthrosis were screened for eligibility . The criteria for exclusion included arthritides other than osteoarthritis ; an operation on the knee within the previous six months ; symptomatic disease of the hip , ankle , or foot ; a previous fracture of the tibia or femur ; morbid obesity ( a body-mass index of more than thirty-five kilograms per square meter ) ; skin disease ; peripheral vascular disease or varicose veins that would preclude use of a brace ; a severe cardiovascular deficit ; blindness ; poor English- language skills ; and an inability to apply a brace because of physical limitations such as arthritis in the h 
    Output:
    
Conclusion : Quality of clinical practice guidelines for orthotic treatment of knee osteoarthritis in the Nordic region is variable .