***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Physical activity reduces the risk of premature death and cardiovascular disease , but the relationship to stroke is less well studied . The objective of this study was to investigate the association between leisure-time physical activity and  ischemic stroke in an urban , elderly , multiethnic population . METHODS The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study is a population -based incidence and case-control study . Case subjects had first ischemic stroke , and control subjects were derived through r and om-digit dialing with 1:2 matching for age , sex , and race/ethnicity .  Physical activity  was recorded through a st and ardized in-person interview regarding the frequency and duration of 14 activities over the 2 prior weeks . Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios ( OR ) and 95 % confidence intervals after adjustment for medical and socioeconomic confounders . RESULTS Over 30 months , 369 case subjects and 678 control subjects were enrolled . Mean age was 69.9 + /- 12 years ; 57 % were women , 18 % whites , 30 % blacks , and 52 % Hispanics .  Leisure-time physical activity  was significantly protective for stroke after adjustment for cardiac disease , peripheral vascular disease , hypertension , diabetes , smoking , alcohol use , obesity , medical reasons for limited activity , education , and season of enrollment ( OR = 0.37 ; 95 % confidence interval=0.25 to 0.55 ) . The protective effect of  physical activity  was detected in both younger and older groups , in men and women , and in whites , blacks , and Hispanics . A dose-response relationship was shown for both intensity ( light-moderate activity OR = 0.39 ; heavy OR = 0.23 ) and duration ( < 2 h/wk OR = 0.42 ; 2 to < 5 h/wk OR = 0.35 ; > or = 5 h/wk OR = 0.31 ) of physical activity . CONCLUSIONS Leisure-time physical activity was related to a decreased occurrence of ischemic stroke in our elderly , multiethnic , urban subjects . More emphasis on physical activity in stroke prevention campaigns is needed among the elderly Seventy two women drinking 21 units ( 210 g ) or more of alcohol per week were recruited from an opportunistic screening programme in eight English general practice s. The women were r and omized into control and treatment groups . Women in the treatment group received ten minutes advice from their general practitioner to reduce alcohol consumption .  At one year follow-up , when analyzed by intention to treat , women in the treatment group had reduced their alcohol consumption from an average of 35 - 24 units per week . Similar reductions were found in the control group ( from 37 - 27 units per week ) . The lack of evidence for a treatment effect may be explained by contamination of the control group by informal interventions In a controlled evaluation of general practitioner (GP)-based brief intervention , 378 excessive drinkers identified opportunistically by screening in 40 group practice s in metropolitan Sydney were assigned to groups receiving : ( i ) a five-session intervention by the GP ( the Alcoholscreen Program ) ; ( ii ) a single session of 5 minutes ' advice by the GP plus a self-help manual ( minimal intervention ) ; ( iii ) an alcohol-related assessment but no intervention ; ( iv ) neither intervention nor assessment . Among all patients allocated to receive it , the Alcoholscreen Program did not result in a significantly greater reduction in consumption at follow-up than control conditions but patients offered Alcoholscreen reported a significantly greater reduction in alcohol-related problems in the period to 6 months follow-up . A greater proportion of patients who returned for the second Alcoholscreen visit were drinking below recommended levels at follow-up than in the remainder of the sample . There was no evidence that minimal intervention or alcohol-related assessment were effective in reducing alcohol consumption or problems . Implication s for further research into GP-based brief interventions are discussed Patients admitted to an emergency surgical ward were screened for alcohol problems and r and omized between an extensive alcohol counseling and a brief assessment followed by feedback of risky alcohol consumption . Some 165 patients were assessed for risk consumption and followed up 6 to 12 months , and it was found that patients in both interventions significantly reduced the amount they drank per occasion although they drank as often as before . The patients had also moved to a stage more ready to change . No differences in effect were found between the interventions . A brief assessment with feedback about risk consumption can be done on an emergency surgical ward by the surgical staff with a few hours of training and may reduce risky alcohol consumption significantly BACKGROUND The U.S. Congress m and ated evaluations , initiated in 1989 , to determine whether extending Medicare benefits to include preventive services would improve health status , reduce costs of care , and improve health risk behaviors of beneficiaries . METHODS The Johns Hopkins Medicare Preventive Services Demonstration was a r and omized trial in which Medicare beneficiaries were assigned either to an intervention group that was offered yearly preventive visits for 2 years and optional counseling visits to their primary care provider or to a control group that received usual care . This report describes the effect of the intervention over a period of 2 years on smoking , problem alcohol use , and sedentary lifestyle . RESULTS Differences were observed between the intervention and control groups in the extent to which changes occurred in smoking and problem alcohol use , but none of the differences was statistically significant . The proportion of smokers who quit was higher in the intervention group than in the control group ( 24.2 vs 17.9 % , P = 0.09 ) . However , a higher proportion of problem drinkers in the control group improved ( 67.1 vs 57.0 % , P = 0.183 ) . There was virtually no difference between the intervention and the control groups in the proportion with improvement in sedentary lifestyle . CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the difficulty of bringing about health behavior change in older patients in the course of a yearly preventive visit for 2 years with their primary care physician when the visit encompasses screening and immunizations , as well as health behavior counseling directed by the physician . Further study is required to determine whether a more intense program of counseling for health behavior change among older persons by their primary care providers would be effective OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of three brief methods of reducing alcohol consumption among family practice patients . DESIGN Patients r and omly assigned to one of three interventions were assessed initially and at 3- , 6- , and 12-month follow-up appointments . SETTING Family practice clinic composed of 12 primary care physicians seeing approximately 6000 adults monthly in a small urban community , population 40,000 . PARTICIPANTS Through a screening question naire , 134 men and 131 women were identified as hazardous drinkers ( five or more drinks at least once monthly ) during an 11-month screening of 1420 patients . Of 265 patients approached , 180 agreed to participate and 159 ( 83 men and 76 women ) actually participated in the study . INTERVENTIONS Three interventions were studied : brief physician advice ( 5 minutes ) , two 30-minute sessions with a physician using cognitive behavioural strategies or two 30-minute sessions with a nurse practitioner using identical strategies . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Quantity and frequency ( QF ) of drinking were used to assess reduction in hazardous drinking and problems related to drinking over 12 months of follow up . RESULTS No statistical difference between groups was found . The QF of monthly drinking was reduced overall by 66 % ( among men ) and 74 % ( among women ) for those reporting at least one hazardous drinking day weekly at assessment ( N = 96 ) . Men reported drinking significantly more than women . CONCLUSIONS These results indicated that offering brief , specific advice can motivate patients to reduce their alcohol intake . There was no difference in effect between brief advice from their own physician or brief intervention by a physician or a nurse Sixteen general practitioners participated in a controlled trial of the Scottish Health Education Group 's  DRAMS ( drinking reasonably and moderately with self-control ) scheme . The scheme was evaluated by r and omly assigning 104 heavy or problem drinkers to three groups - a group participating in the DRAMS scheme  ( n = 34 ) , a group given simple advice only ( n = 32 ) and a non-intervention control group ( n = 38 ) . Six month follow-up information was obtained for 91 subjects ( 87.5 % of initial sample ) . There were no significant differences between the groups in reduction in alcohol consumption , but patients in the DRAMS group showed a significantly greater reduction in a logarithmic measure of serum gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase than patients in the group receiving advice only . Only 14 patients in the DRAMS group completed the full DRAMS procedure . For the sample as a whole , there was a significant reduction in alcohol consumption , a significant improvement on a measure of physical health and well-being , and significant reductions in the logarithmic measure of serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and in mean corpuscular volume . The implication s of these findings for future research into controlled drinking minimal interventions in general practice are discussed OBJECTIVE : To determine effectiveness of advice from general practitioners to heavy drinkers to reduce their  excessive alcohol consumption ( 35 U or more a week for men , 21 U or more for women ) . DESIGN : R and omised , controlled double blind trial over 12 months with interim assessment at six months . SETTING : Group practice s ( n = 47 ; list size averaging 10,000 ) recruited from Medical Research Council 's general practice research framework , mostly in rural or small urban setting s. PATIENTS : Patients recruited after question naire survey . Of total of 2571 ( 61.2 % ) of 4203 patients invited for interview who attended , 909 ( 35.4 % ) stated that in past seven days they had drunk above the limits set for study and had not received advice ; they were r and omised to control and treatment groups . INTERVENTIONS : Patients in treatment group were interviewed by general practitioner ( who had had a training session ) and received advice and information about how to reduce consumption and also given a drinking diary . END POINT : Study aim ed at detecting a reduction in proportion of men with excessive alcohol consumption of 30 % in treatment group and 20 % in control group ( for women 40 % and 20 % , respectively ) with a power of 90 % at 5 % level of significance . In addition , corroborative measures such as estimation of gamma-glutamyltransferase activity were included . MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS : At one year a mean reduction in consumption of alcohol of 18.2 ( SE 1.5 ) U/week had occurred in treated men compared with a reduction of 8.1 ( 1.6 ) U/week in controls ( p less than 0.001 ) . The proportion of men with excessive consumption at interview had dropped by 43.7 % in the treatment group compared with 25.5 % in controls ( p less than 0.001 ) . A mean reduction in weekly consumption of 11.5 ( 1.6 ) U occurred in treated women compared with 6.3 ( 2.0 ) U in controls ( p less than 0.05 ) , with proportionate reductions of excessive drinkers in treatment and control groups of 47.7 % and 29.2 % respectively . Reduction in consumption increased significantly with number of general practitioner interventions . At one year the mean value for gamma-glutamyltransferase activity had dropped significantly more in treated men ( -2.4 (0.9)IU/l ) than in controls ( + 1.1(1.0)IU/l ; t = 2.7 , p less than 0.01 ) . Reduction in gamma-glutamyltransferase activity tended to increase with number of intervention sessions in men . Changes in gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in women and changes in other indicators in both sexes did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups . CONCLUSIONS : If the results of this study were applied to the United Kingdom intervention by general practitioners could each year reduce to moderate levels the alcohol consumption of some 250000 men and 67500 women who currently drink to excess . General practitioners and other members of the primary health care team should therefore be encouraged to include counselling about alcohol consumption in their preventive activities OBJECTIVE To evaluate the correspondence among measures of self-reported drinking , st and ard biological indicators and the reports of collateral informants , and to identify patient characteristics associated with observed discrepancies among these three sources of research data . METHOD Using data collected from a large-scale clinical trial of treatment matching with alcoholics ( N = 1,726 ) , these three alternative outcome measures were compared at the time of admission to treatment and at 12 months after the end of treatment . RESULTS Patient self-reports and collateral reports agreed most ( 97.1 % ) at treatment admission when heavy drinking was unlikely to be denied . In contrast , liver function tests were relatively insensitive , with positive serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase ( GGTP ) values obtained from only 39.7 % of those who admitted to heavy drinking . At 15-month follow-up the correspondence between client self-report and collateral report decreased to 84.7 % , but agreement with blood chemistry values increased to 51.6 % . When discrepancies occurred , they still indicated that the client ' s self-report is more sensitive to the amount of drinking than the biochemical measures . Patients who presented discrepant results tended to have more severe drinking problems , more previous treatments , higher levels of pretreatment drinking and significantly greater levels of cognitive impairment , all of which could potentially interfere with accurate recall . CONCLUSIONS In clinical trials using self-selected research volunteers , biochemical tests and collateral informant reports do 
    Output:
    
Studies also relate heavy per-occasion alcohol use ( binge drinking ) to acute injury risks and alcohol-related life problems ( 4 , 22 ) .
Injury rates are higher for binge drinkers who consume 5 or more drinks on one occasion as infrequently as 3 to 6 times per year , even when average intake is not excessive ( 24 ) .
Even so , few primary care clinicians use recommended screening protocol s or offer treatment ( 33 ) .
Definitions No consistent definitions for the drinking patterns that should be the focus of primary care interventions are available from existing guidelines or research ; however , it is commonly held that less severe alcohol problems are appropriate for brief interventions in primary care , whereas more severe problems need specialty addiction treatment ( 41 ) .