***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Background This pilot r and omized controlled trial evaluated the feasibility of conducting a full scale study and compared the efficacy of exercise , spinal manipulation , and a mind-body therapy called Neuro Emotional Technique for the treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain , a common morbidity of pregnancy . Methods Healthy pregnant women with low back pain of insidious onset were eligible to enroll in the study at any point in their pregnancy . Once enrolled , they remained in the study until they had their babies . Women were r and omly allocated into one of three treatment groups using opaque envelopes . The treatment schedule paralleled the prenatal care schedule and women received individualized intervention . Our null hypothesis was that spinal manipulation and Neuro Emotional Technique would perform no better than exercise in enhancing function and decreasing pain . Our primary outcome measure was the Rol and Morris Disability Question naire and our secondary outcome measure was the Numeric Pain Rating Scale . Intention to treat analysis was conducted . For the primary analysis , regression was conducted to compare groups on the outcome measure scores . In a secondary responder analysis , difference in proportions of participants in attaining 30 % and 50 % improvement were calculated . Feasibility factors for conducting a future larger trial were also evaluated such as recruitment , compliance to study protocol s , cost , and adverse events . Results Fifty-seven participants were r and omized into the exercise ( n = 22 ) , spinal manipulation ( n = 15 ) , and Neuro Emotional Technique ( n = 20 ) treatment arms . At least 50 % of participants in each treatment group experienced clinical ly meaningful improvement in symptoms for the Rol and Morris Disability Question naire . At least 50 % of the exercise and spinal manipulation participants also experienced clinical ly meaningful improvement for the Numeric Pain Rating Scale . There were no clinical ly meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups in any analysis . Conclusions This pilot study demonstrated feasibility for recruitment , compliance , safety , and affordability for conducting a larger study in the future . Spinal manipulation and exercise generally performed slightly better than did Neuro Emotional Technique for improving function and decreasing pain , but the study was not powered to detect the between-group differences as statistically significant . Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov ( Identifier : NCT00937365 ) OBJECTIVE Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain is a major problem for the majority of pregnant women . Complementary medicine has been used to alleviate pain , and yoga is one of the most commonly chosen alternative methods . The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Hatha yoga in the reduction of lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy . METHODS A r and omized controlled trial with 60 pregnant women ( age range , 14 - 40 years ) who reported lumbopelvic pain at 12 to 32 weeks of gestation was conducted from June 2009 to June 2011 . Pregnant women who had twin pregnancies , had medical restrictions for exercise , used analgesics , and participated in physical therapy were excluded from the study . Pregnant women were divided into two groups : the yoga group , practicing exercises guided by this method , and the postural orientation group , performing st and ardized posture orientation according to instructions provided in a pamphlet . Treatment in each group lasted 10 weeks . A visual analog scale ( VAS ) was used to measure pain intensity . Lumbar pain and posterior pelvic pain provocation tests were used to confirm the presence of pain . Statistical analysis included the Mann-Whitney test , the McNemar test , a paired Wilcoxon test , and analysis of covariance . RESULTS The median pain score was lower in the yoga group ( p<.0058 ) than the postural orientation group . Lumbar pain provocation tests showed a decreased response in relation to posterior pelvic pain provocation tests and a gradual reduction in pain intensity during 10 yoga sessions ( p<.024 ) . CONCLUSIONS The yoga method was more effective at reducing lumbopelvic pain intensity compared with postural orientation OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of an exercise program , including specific stabilizing exercises , on pain intensity and functional ability in women with pregnancy-related low back pain . METHODS Fifty women between 16 and 24 weeks of pregnancy were recruited at Tygerberg and Paarl Hospitals , Western Cape , South Africa . Twenty-six women were r and omized to a 10-week exercise program and 24 were r and omized as controls .  RESULTS Overall , the most frequent type of back pain experienced was lumbar pain ( 36 [ 72.0 % ] ) . Pain intensity ( P=0.76 ) and functional ability ( P=0.29 ) were comparable between the groups on study entry . In the study group , there was a significant improvement in pain intensity ( P<0.01 ) and an improvement in functional ability ( P=0.06 ) at the end of the study . In the control group , there were no significant changes in pain intensity ( P=0.89 ) or functional ability ( P=0.70 ) at the end of the study . CONCLUSION A specific exercise program decreased back pain intensity and increased functional ability during pregnancy in South African women with lumbar and pelvic girdle pain Eighty-four depressed pregnant women were recruited during the second trimester of pregnancy and r and omly assigned to a massage therapy group , a progressive muscle relaxation group or a control group that received st and ard prenatal care alone . These groups were compared to each other and to a non-depressed group at the end of pregnancy . The massage therapy group participants received two 20 min therapy sessions by their significant others each week for 16 weeks of pregnancy , starting during the second trimester . The relaxation group provided themselves with progressive muscle relaxation sessions on the same time schedule . Immediately after the massage therapy sessions on the first and last days of the 16-week period the women reported lower levels of anxiety and depressed mood and less leg and back pain . By the end of the study the massage group had higher dopamine and serotonin levels and lower levels of cortisol and norepinephrine . These changes may have contributed to the reduced fetal activity and the better neonatal outcome for the massage group ( i.e. lesser incidence of prematurity and low birthweight ) , as well as their better performance on the Brazelton Neonatal Behavior Assessment . The data suggest that depressed pregnant women and their offspring can benefit from massage therapy Objective . To study lumbopelvic pain in women r and omized to a regular exercise program during pregnancy in comparison to women receiving st and ard antenatal care . Design . A two‐armed , two‐center , r and omized controlled trial . Setting . St Olavs Hospital , Trondheim University Hospital and Stavanger University Hospital . Population . A total of 855 pregnant women were r and omized to intervention or control groups . Methods . The intervention was a 12 week exercise program , including aerobic and strengthening exercises , conducted between 20 and 36 weeks of pregnancy . One weekly group session was led by physiotherapists , and home exercises were encouraged twice a week . The control group received st and ard antenatal care . Main outcome measures . Self‐reports of lumbopelvic pain and sick leave due to lumbopelvic pain . The data were analysed according to the “ intention‐to‐treat ” principle . Results . There were no significant differences between groups of women reporting lumbopelvic pain at 36 weeks ( 74 vs. 75 % , p=0.76 ) . The proportion of women on sick leave due to lumbopelvic pain was lower in the intervention group ( 22 % vs 31 % , p=0.01 ) . Conclusions . Exercise during pregnancy does not influence the prevalence of lumbopelvic pain , but women offered a regular exercise course seem to h and le the disorder better Background Absence of knowledge of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain ( PPGP ) has prompted the start of a large cohort study in the Netherl and s. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and incidence of PPGP , to identify risk factors involved in the onset and to determine the prognosis of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain . Methods / design 7,526 pregnant women of the southeast of the Netherl and s participated in a prospect i ve cohort study . During a 2-year period , they were recruited by midwives and gynecologists at 14 weeks of pregnancy . Participants completed a question naire at baseline , at 30 weeks of pregnancy , at 2 weeks after delivery , at 6 months after delivery and at 1 year after delivery . The study uses extensive question naires with questions ranging from physical complaints , limitations in activities , restriction in participation , work situation , demographics , lifestyle , pregnancy-related factors and psychosocial factors . Discussion This large-scale prospect i ve cohort study will provide reliable insights in incidence , prevalence and factors related to etiology and prognosis of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain OBJECTIVE Women commonly experience low back pain during pregnancy . We examined whether a multimodal approach of musculoskeletal and obstetric management ( MOM ) was superior to st and ard obstetric care to reduce pain , impairment , and disability in the antepartum period . STUDY DESIGN A prospect i ve , r and omized trial of 169 women was conducted . Baseline evaluation occurred at 24 - 28 weeks ' gestation , with follow-up at 33 weeks ' gestation . Primary outcomes were the Numerical Rating Scale ( NRS ) for pain and the Quebec Disability Question naire ( QDQ ) . Both groups received routine obstetric care . Chiropractic specialists provided manual therapy , stabilization exercises , and patient education to MOM participants . RESULTS The MOM group demonstrated significant mean reductions in Numerical Rating Scale scores ( 5.8 ± 2.2 vs 2.9 ± 2.5 ; P < .001 ) and Quebec Disability Question naire scores ( 4.9 ± 2.2 vs 3.9 ± 2.4 ; P < .001 ) from baseline to follow-up evaluation . The group that received st and ard obstetric care demonstrated no significant improvements . CONCLUSION A multimodal approach to low back and pelvic pain in mid pregnancy benefits patients more than st and ard obstetric care OBJECTIVE To study osteopathic manipulative treatment of back pain and related symptoms during the third trimester of pregnancy . STUDY DESIGN A r and omized , placebo-controlled trial was conducted to compare usual obstetric care and osteopathic manipulative treatment , usual obstetric care and sham ultrasound treatment , and usual obstetric care only . Outcomes included average pain levels and the Rol and -Morris Disability Question naire to assess back-specific functioning . RESULTS Intention-to-treat analyses included 144 subjects . The Rol and -Morris Disability Question naire scores worsened during pregnancy ; however , back-specific functioning deteriorated significantly less in the usual obstetric care and osteopathic manipulative treatment group ( effect size , 0.72 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.31 - 1.14 ; P = .001 vs usual obstetric care only ; and effect size , 0.35 ; 95 % confidence interval , -0.06 to 0.76 ; P = .09 vs usual obstetric care and sham ultrasound treatment ) . During pregnancy , back pain decreased in the usual obstetric care and osteopathic manipulative treatment group , remained unchanged in the usual obstetric care and sham ultrasound treatment group , and increased in the usual obstetric care only group , although no between-group difference achieved statistical significance . CONCLUSION Osteopathic manipulative treatment slows or halts the deterioration of back-specific functioning during the third trimester of pregnancy OBJECTIVE To investigate if water-gymnastics during pregnancy may reduce the intensity of back/low back pain and the number of days on sick-leave . METHODS A prospect i ve , r and omized study . One hundred and twenty-nine women were r and omized to participate in water-gymnastics once a week during the second half of pregnancy and 129 were r and omized to a control group . The women in both groups filled in question naires in gestational weeks 18 , 34 and within the first postpartum week . Every day from week 18 to labor they assessed the intensity of back/low back pain . RESULTS Back pain intensity increased during pregnancy . No excess risk for the pregnancy associated with water-gymnastics was observed . The women participating in water-gymnastics recorded a lower intensity of back/low back pain . The total number of days on sick-leave because of back/low back pain was 982 in the water-gymnastics group ( 124 women ) compared with 1484 in the control group ( 120 women ) . After weeks 32 33 , seven women in the water-gymnastics group compared with 17 in the control group were on sickleave because of back/ low back pain ( p=0.031 ) . CONCLUSIONS Intensity of back/low back pain increased with advancing pregnancy . There was no excess risk for urinary or vaginal infections associated with water-gymnastics . Water-gymnastics during the second half of pregnancy significantly reduced the intensity of back/ low back pain .  Water-gymnastics decreased the number of women on sick-leave because of back/low back pain .  Water-gymnastics during pregnancy can be recommended as a method to relieve back pain and may reduce the need for sick-leave Lower back pain and lordosis are among the most common complications during pregnancy ; their frequency in pregnant women is 4 times that in non-pregnant women [ 1 ] . The present study evaluated the effect of exercise on back pain during pregnancy  . Inclusion criteria were maternal age of 20–30 years ; nulliparity ; gestational age of 16 weeks ( according to reliable last 
    Output:
    
All included studies on exercise therapy , and most of the studies on interventions combined with patient education , reported a positive effect on pain , disability , and /or sick leave .