***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of a back school program in pain , functional status , quality of life , and in anxiety and depression in patients with non-specific low back pain . METHODS Sixty patients with low back pain were r and omized to an intervention and control group . The intervention group underwent a five-weekly back school program . The control group was seen in weekly medical visits , without educative approaches . Both groups took acetaminophen as analgesic medication . All subjects were evaluated by a blind physiotherapist after r and omization , 30 , 60 and 120 days . Roll and -Morris , SF-36 , STAI and Beck question naires , pain visual analogical scale and Schober 's test were applied . Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ( NSAID ) consumption was considered co-intervention . The statistical analyses were performed using Pearson 's Chi-Square analysis and Student 's t-test to compare the baseline characteristics of the groups and the analysis of variance ( ANOVA ) with repeated measures to assess changes inter/intra groups . RESULTS There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups . Fifty-five patients completed the study . The intervention group showed a significant improvement in the general health domain , assessed by SF-36 , and also in the reduction of acetaminophen and NSAID intake . There was no significant difference between the groups in pain , functional status , anxiety or depression . CONCLUSION The back school program was more effective than any educational intervention in general health status and in decreasing acetaminophen and NSAID intake . It was ineffective in the other quality of life domains , in pain , functional status , anxiety and depression OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of the addition of back school to exercise and physical treatment modalities in relieving pain and improving the functional status of patients with chronic low back pain . DESIGN A r and omized controlled trial . PATIENTS A total of 146 patients with chronic low back pain were enrolled in the study . METHODS Subjects were divided into 2 groups : the back school group received exercise , physical treatment modalities and a back school programme ; and the control group received exercise and physical treatment modalities .  Treatment efficacy was evaluated at the end of treatment and 3 months post-treatment , in terms of pain , measured with the Visual Analogue Scale , and functional status , measured with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire . RESULTS In both groups , Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire were significantly reduced after therapy ( p < 0.01 ) , but the difference between the scores at the end of treatment and 3 months post-treatment was not significant . There was a significant improvement in Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire in the back school group compared with the control group at the end of therapy and 3 months post-treatment ( p < 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION The addition of back school was more effective than exercise and physical treatment modalities alone in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain In a prospect i ve trial , 222 adults with low-back pain of at least 2 weeks ' duration in a Health Maintenance Organization ( HMO ) were r and omly assigned to usual care ( UC ) , a 4-hour back school psychoeducational session ( LBS ) , or the same back school plus a 1-year “ compliance package ” program design ed to encourage appropriate self-management for back pain ( CP ) . Sixty-four percent of LBS and CP subjects attended their back school sessions . Follow-up measurement of pain level ( using the Visual Analogue Scale ) , functional status ( using the Sickness Impact Profile ) , and various other indicators of health status showed no measurable effect of either treatment condition ( LBS or CP ) compared with UC at 3 , 6 , 12 , and 18 months after entry into the study . Initial disability resolved by 3 months in most patients , and a minority of subjects ( 10–15 % ) showed residual or recurrent functional Impairment 1 year after entry . Health care utilization tended to be slightly higher after intervention In the CP group . With or without follow-up encouragement , back school instructions given in a single 4-hour session had no measurable impact on the comfort or functional status of the majority of patients with new onset back pain in this HMO Abstract Purpose : To determine the efficacy of the Feldenkrais method for relieving pain in patients with chronic low back pain ( CLBP ) and the improvement of interoceptive awareness . Method : This study was design ed as a single-blind r and omized controlled trial . Fifty-three patients with a diagnosis of CLBP for at least 3 months were r and omly allocated to the Feldenkrais ( mean age 61.21 ± 11.53 years ) or Back School group ( mean age 60.70 ± 11.72 years ) . Pain was assessed using the visual analog scale ( VAS ) and McGill Pain Question naire ( MPQ ) , disability was evaluated with the Waddel Disability Index , quality of life was measured with the Short Form-36 Health Survey ( SF-36 ) , and mind – body interactions were studied using the Multidimensional  Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Question naire  ( MAIA ) . Data were collected at baseline , at the end of treatment , and at the 3-month follow-up . Results : The two groups were matched at baseline for all the computed parameters . At the end of treatment ( Tend ) , there were no significant differences between groups regarding chronic pain reduction ( p = 0.290 ) ; VAS and MAIA-N sub scores correlated at Tend ( R = 0.296 , p = 0.037 ) . By the Friedman analysis , both groups experienced significant changes in pain ( p < 0.001 ) and disability ( p < 0.001 ) along the investigated period . Conclusions : The Feldenkrais method has comparable efficacy as Back School in CLBP . Implication s for rehabilitation The Feldenkrais method is a mind – body therapy that is based on awareness through movement lessons , which are verbally guided explorations of movement that are conducted by a physiotherapist who is experienced and trained in this method . It aims to increase self-awareness , exp and a person ’s repertoire of movements , and to promote increased functioning in context s in which the entire body cooperates in the execution of movements . Interoceptive awareness , which improves with rehabilitation , has a complex function in the perception of chronic pain and should be investigated further in future research . The efficacy  of the Feldenkrais method is comparable with that of BS for nonspecific chronic low back pain . The physician can recommend a body – mind rehabilitation approach , such as the Feldenkrais method , or an educational and rehabilitation program , such as BS , to the patient , based on his individual needs . The 2 rehabilitation approaches are equally as effective in improving interoceptive awareness Background Different interventions can reduce the burden of the chronic low back pain . One example is the use of a ' Back School Programme ' . This is a brief therapy that uses a health education method to empower participants through a procedure of assessment , education and skill development . This study aim ed to evaluate to what extent the programme could improve quality of life in those who suffer from the condition . Methods This was a r and omized controlled trial . One-hundred and two female patients with low back pain ( n = 102 ) were r and omly allocated into two groups , matched in terms of age , weight , education , socioeconomic status , occupation and some aspects of risk behavior . Group 1 ( back school group , n = 50 ) but not group 2 ( clinic group , n = 52 ) received the ' Back School Programme ' . Then quality of life using the Short Form Health Survey ( SF-36 ) was assessed at two time points : at baseline and at three months follow-up . The findings were compared both within and between two groups . Results The ' Back School Programme ' was effective in improving patients ' quality of life ; significant differences were found on all eight subscales of the SF-36 for group 1 . In the clinic group ( group 2 ) , improvement was observed on three scales ( bodily pain , vitality and mental health ) but these improvements were less than in group 1 . The mean improvement over all eight subscales of the SF-36 was significantly better for the ' Back School Programme ' group . Conclusion The ' Back School Programme ' is an effective intervention and might improve the quality of life over a period of 3 months in patients who experience chronic low back pain The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of two different treatment modalities on the rehabilitation process of chronic sacroiliac joint patients . The treatment modalities included spinal manipulative therapy given by a chiropractor and a program of back school therapy given by a physiotherapist . The rehabilitation process was assessed using clinical and biomechanical measures . It was found that back school therapy was a better treatment modality than the spinal manipulative therapy , according to the clinical measures of rehabilitation . Precisely the opposite result was found for the biomechanical measures The aim of this trial was to determine whether social interaction between patients with long-lasting nonspecific back pain reduces subjective or objective disability .  The participants were selected from persons visiting an occupational health care unit because of back pain . After a clinical examination in a university clinic , subjects without a specific diagnosis and having no disabilities preventing active rehabilitation were selected for study . The subjects ( n = 108 ) were r and omized into treatment ( n = 54 ) and  control groups ( n = 54 ) . Altogether 18 study groups , 9 treatment groups and 9 groups for controls , were formed . Before starting the back schools altogether 15 subjects dropped out . Both the treatment groups ( n = 47 ) and the controls ( n = 46 ) attended a back school consisting of 10 lessons and demonstrations supervised by a physiotherapist . The participants in treatment groups , but not the controls , had physical exercise and social intercourse with other members within the group . The clinical examination was repeated after 6 and 12 months . Both the treatment groups and the controls showed improvement in perceived functional capacity ( assessed with Oswestry disability question naire ) and in perceived life quality ( assessed with 15D score ) . At the 6-month follow-up life quality had improved statistically significantly more among the participants in treatment groups than among the controls , and at the 12-month follow-up the Oswestry index showed corresponding improvement . Among subjects suffering from nonspecific back pain , social support improves the results of active rehabilitation A clinical trial , aim ed at secondary prevention of low-back pain , was performed in 142 hospital employees reporting at least three annual episodes of this condition . Participants were r and omly assigned to one of three groups : a calisthenics program ( CAL ) for 3 months with biweekly sessions of flexion exercises , a back school program ( 5 sessions ) , and a control group . The effectiveness of the two intervention programs was evaluated over a 1-year period . Baseline preintervention data and evaluation at the end of 3 months of intervention and after an additional 6 months were collected . A monthly surveillance for the whole year showed a mean of 4.5 “ painful months ” in the CAL group versus 7.3 and 7.4 months in the back school and control groups , respectively ( P < 0.0001 ) . The superiority of the CAL group was achieved partly because of the significant increase in trunk forward flexion and to initial increment in abdominal muscle strength . The increased trunk flexion was associated with the rate of participation in the CAL sessions . Further research is needed to answer the question of “ intensity versus type of exercise ” by comparing different intervention programs , with similar intensity Stopping r and omized trials early because of an apparent benefit is a growing phenomenon . A recent systematic review found that the number of r and omized trials stopped early for benefit has more than doubled since 1990 ( 1 ) . To protect and promote the interests of trial participants , investigators may feel ethically obligated to stop a trial early because of the unexpected harm or apparent benefit of a study treatment . If a study treatment 's benefit far outweighs its adverse effects , is it not unethical to continue enrolling patients in a trial in which , as is typically the case , patients have a 50 % chance of receiving a placebo or an inferior treatment ? In this article , we argue that stopping a r and omized trial early for apparent benefit is often unethical and can be justified only under restricted circumstances . If the scientific community were to accept our arguments , then the approach that investigators , institutional review boards , and data monitoring committees take to the practice of stopping trials early for apparent benefit would substantially change . Ethical Considerations Emanuel and colleagues ( 2 ) describe a framework of 7 requirements for determining whether clinical research is ethical . We use this framework to identify and assess the ethical issues raised by stopping trials early because of apparent benefit ( Table ) . Table . Ethical Violations Result ing from Stopping a Trial Early for Apparent Benefit Scientific Validity The purpose of a trial of alternative interventions is to generate an estimate of treatment effect that closely approximates the true effect and is not misleading . This requires application of scientific procedures that yield valid and reliable data and thus minimize both systematic and r and om error . A systematic review of r and omized trials stopped early for apparent benefit ( 1 ) found that many of the trials yielded implausibly large treatment effects ; the median relative risk was 0.53 . Apparent large treatment effects occurred much more frequently when trials accrued only a small number of events . The odds of a treatment effect larger than the overall median relative risk of 0.53 was 28 times greater ( 95 % CI , 11 to 73 ) among trials in which fewer than the median of 66 events accrued than among trials in which more events accrued . These results , which are consistent with predictions from statistical theory ( 3 ) , suggest that stopping trials early for apparent benefit will systematic ally overestimate treatment effects . The scientific validity of trials that are stopped early is further compromised when trials yield inconclusive data about outcomes that did not influence trial truncation but are nonetheless important to patients , such as disease-free survival , symptom control , quality of life , and adverse effects of treatment . For example , a trial of vitamin E supplementation in premature newborns that was stopped early 
    Output:
    
Due to the low- to very low- quality of the evidence for all treatment comparisons , outcomes , and follow-up periods investigated , it is uncertain if Back School is effective for chronic low back pain .
Although the quality of the evidence was mostly very low , the results showed no difference or a trivial effect in favour of Back School .