***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: Study Design . A prospect i ve , r and omized , single ( investigator ) blind , comparative efficacy trial was conducted . Objective . To compare the efficacy of continuous low-level heat wrap therapy ( 40 C , 8 hours/day ) with that of ibuprofen ( 1200 mg/day ) and acetaminophen ( 4000 mg/day ) in subjects with acute nonspecific low back pain . Summary of Background Data . The efficacy of topical heat methods , as compared with oral analgesic treatment of low back pain , has not been established . Methods . Subjects ( n = 371 ) were r and omly assigned to heat wrap ( n = 113 ) , acetaminophen ( n = 113 ) , or ibuprofen ( n = 106 ) for efficacy evaluation , or to oral placebo ( n = 20 ) or unheated back wrap ( n = 19 ) for blinding . Outcome measures included pain relief , muscle stiffness , lateral trunk flexibility , and disability . Efficacy was measured over two treatment days and two follow-up days . Results . Day 1 pain relief for the heat wrap ( mean , 2 ) was higher than for ibuprofen ( mean , 1.51;P = 0.0007 ) or acetaminophen ( mean , 1.32;P = 0.0001 ) . Extended mean pain relief ( Days 3 to 4 ) for the heat wrap ( mean , 2.61 ) also was higher than for ibuprofen ( mean , 1.68;P = 0.0001 ) or acetaminophen ( mean , 1.95;P = 0.0009 ) . Lateral trunk flexibility was improved with the heat wrap ( mean change , 4.28 cm ) during treatment ( P ≤ 0.009 vs acetaminophen [ mean change , 2.93 cm ] , P ≤ 0.001 vs ibuprofen [ mean change , 2.51 cm ] ) . The results were similar on Day 4 . Day 1 reduction in muscle stiffness with the heat wrap ( mean , 16.3 ) was greater than with acetaminophen ( mean , 10.5;P = 0.001 ) . Disability was reduced with the heat wrap ( mean , 4.9 ) , as compared with ibuprofen ( mean , 2.7;P = 0.01 ) and acetaminophen ( mean , 2.9;P = 0.0007 ) , on Day 4 . None of the adverse events were serious . The highest rate ( 10.4 % ) was reported in the ibuprofen group . Conclusion . Continuous low-level heat wrap therapy was superior to both acetaminophen and ibuprofen for treating low back pain The roles of bedrest , antiinflammatory medication , and analgesic medication in the treatment of acute back strain were objective ly analyzed to determine whether they have a measurable effect on the return of  patients  to full daily activities as well as on the relief of pain . Two hundred patients were studied prospect ively . Each patient had the diagnosis of acute back strain , which was defined as nonradiating low-back pain . The results of the patient 's neurologic examination , straight leg raising test , and lumbosacral spine roentgenograms had to be within normal limits for the patient to be included in the study . The results showed that bedrest , as compared with ambulation , will decrease the amount of time lost from work by 50 % . Bedrest will also decrease the amount of discomfort by 60 % . Analgesic medication , when combined with bedrest , will further decrease the amount of pain incurred , particularly when used in the first three days of the healing process . However , analgesic medication will not allow a more prompt return to work .  Antiinflammatory medication , when added to bedrest in the treatment of lumbago , does not provide an advantage over bedrest alone Thirty-nine patients with acute low back pain were treated with amitriptyline ( 150 mg/d ) or acetaminophen ( 2,000 mg/d ) in a controlled double-blind design for 5 weeks . Both groups revealed mild depression , normal coping , and increased anxiety at the beginning , with significant improvement in anxiety state and pain at the end of treatment . A repeated measures analysis of variance demonstrated that amitriptyline was more effective than acetaminophen in reducing pain intensity from the second week of treatment . Age and depression were the only significant pretreatment predictors of posttreatment pain . The study evaluates the significance of these findings BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Assessment of the quality of r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) is common practice in systematic review s. However , the reliability of data obtained with most quality assessment scales has not been established . This report describes 2 studies design ed to investigate the reliability of data obtained with the Physiotherapy Evidence Data base ( PEDro ) scale developed to rate the quality of RCTs evaluating physical therapist interventions . METHOD In the first study , 11 raters independently rated 25 RCTs r and omly selected from the PEDro data base . In the second study , 2 raters rated 120 RCTs r and omly selected from the PEDro data base , and disagreements were resolved by a third rater ; this generated a set of individual rater and consensus ratings . The process was repeated by independent raters to create a second set of individual and consensus ratings . Reliability of ratings of PEDro scale items was calculated using multirater kappas , and reliability of the total ( summed ) score was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients ( ICC [ 1,1 ] ) . RESULTS The kappa value for each of the 11 items ranged from.36 to.80 for individual assessors and from.50 to.79 for consensus ratings generated by groups of 2 or 3 raters . The ICC for the total score was.56 ( 95 % confidence interval=.47-.65 ) for ratings by individuals , and the ICC for consensus ratings was.68 ( 95 % confidence interval=.57-.76 ) . DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The reliability of ratings of PEDro scale items varied from " fair " to " substantial , " and the reliability of the total PEDro score was " fair " to " good . A total of 395 male infantry recruits were evaluated in a prospect i ve study of possible risk factors for overexertional back pain and the efficacy of drug treatment regimens for this syndrome . Recruits were classified into subgroups of lumbar or thoracic , and paraspinal or spinous process pain . Recruits were divided into three treatment groups : Ibuprofen , Paracetamol , and no drug treatment . Of the recruits , 18 % were diagnosed as having overexertional back pain during the course of 14 weeks of training . By multivariate analysis low body mass index was found to be a risk factor for overexertional lumbar pain ( p = 0.005 ) and increased lumbar lordosis a risk factor for overexertional thoracic pain ( p = 0.005 ) . Of recruits with overexertional back pain , 65 % were asymptomatic by the end of basic training . There was no statistically significant difference between cure rates according to treatment groups 
    Output:
    
No trial reported a statistically significant difference in favor of paracetamol .
There is insufficient evidence to assess the efficacy of paracetamol in patients with low back pain .