***TASK*** the task is to summarize an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***INPUT*** the input is a biomedical literature 
    ***OUTPUT*** the output is the summary of an input biomedical literature in six sentences 
    ***DOCUMENTATION*** 
    ***EXAMPLES*** 
    Input: BACKGROUND The treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma has been revolutionised by targeted therapy with drugs that block angiogenesis . So far , no phase 3 r and omised trials comparing the effectiveness of one targeted agent against another have been reported . We did a r and omised phase 3 study comparing axitinib , a potent and selective second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor ( VEGF ) receptors , with sorafenib , an approved VEGF receptor inhibitor , as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer . METHODS We included patients coming from 175 sites ( hospitals and outpatient clinics ) in 22 countries aged 18 years or older with confirmed renal clear-cell carcinoma who progressed despite first-line therapy containing sunitinib , bevacizumab plus interferon-alfa , temsirolimus , or cytokines .  Patients were stratified according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and type of previous treatment and then r and omly assigned ( 1:1 ) to either axitinib ( 5 mg twice daily ) or sorafenib ( 400 mg twice daily ) . Axitinib dose increases to 7 mg and then to 10 mg , twice daily , were allowed for those patients without hypertension or adverse reactions above grade 2 . Participants were not masked to study treatment . The primary endpoint was progression-free survival ( PFS ) and was assessed by a masked , independent radiology review and analysed by intention to treat . This trial was registered on Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT00678392 . FINDINGS A total of 723 patients were enrolled and r and omly assigned to receive axitinib ( n=361 ) or sorafenib ( n=362 ) . The median PFS was 6·7 months with axitinib compared to 4·7 months with sorafenib ( hazard ratio 0·665 ; 95 % CI 0·544 - 0·812 ; one-sided p<0·0001 ) . Treatment was discontinued because of toxic effects in 14 ( 4 % ) of 359 patients treated with axitinib and 29 ( 8 % ) of 355 patients treated with sorafenib . The most common adverse events were diarrhoea , hypertension , and fatigue in the axitinib arm , and diarrhoea , palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia , and alopecia in the sorafenib arm . INTERPRETATION Axitinib result ed in significantly longer PFS compared with sorafenib . Axitinib is a treatment option for second-line therapy of advanced renal cell carcinoma . FUNDING Pfizer BACKGROUND We conducted a multinational , r and omized study to compare radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus cetuximab , a monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor , in the treatment of locoregionally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck . METHODS Patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer were r and omly assigned to treatment with high-dose radiotherapy alone ( 213 patients ) or high-dose radiotherapy plus weekly cetuximab  ( 211 patients ) at an initial dose of 400 mg per square meter of body-surface area , followed by 250 mg per square meter weekly for the duration of radiotherapy . The primary end point was the duration of control of locoregional disease ; secondary end points were overall survival , progression-free survival , the response rate , and safety . RESULTS The median duration of locoregional control was 24.4 months among patients treated with cetuximab plus radiotherapy and 14.9 months among those given radiotherapy alone ( hazard ratio for locoregional progression or death , 0.68 ; P=0.005 ) . With a median follow-up of 54.0 months , the median duration of overall survival was 49.0 months among patients treated with combined therapy and 29.3 months among those treated with radiotherapy alone ( hazard ratio for death , 0.74 ; P=0.03 ) . Radiotherapy plus cetuximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival ( hazard ratio for disease progression or death , 0.70 ; P=0.006 ) . With the exception of acneiform rash and infusion reactions , the incidence of grade 3 or greater toxic effects , including mucositis , did not differ significantly between the two groups . CONCLUSIONS Treatment of locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer with concomitant high-dose radiotherapy plus cetuximab improves locoregional control and reduces mortality without increasing the common toxic effects associated with radiotherapy to the head and neck . ( Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00004227 . BACKGROUND Trastuzumab , a monoclonal antibody against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2 ; also known as ERBB2 ) , was investigated in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer . METHODS ToGA ( Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer ) was an open-label , international , phase 3 , r and omised controlled trial undertaken in 122 centres in 24 countries . Patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer were eligible for inclusion if their tumours showed overexpression of HER2 protein by immunohistochemistry or gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation . Participants were r and omly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a chemotherapy regimen consisting of capecitabine plus cisplatin or fluorouracil plus cisplatin given every 3 weeks for six cycles or chemotherapy in combination with intravenous trastuzumab . Allocation was by block r and omisation stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status , chemotherapy regimen , extent of disease , primary cancer site , and measurability of disease , implemented with a central interactive voice recognition system . The primary endpoint was overall survival in all r and omised patients who received study medication at least once . This trial is registered with Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT01041404 . FINDINGS 594 patients were r and omly assigned to study treatment ( trastuzumab plus chemotherapy , n=298 ; chemotherapy alone , n=296 ) , of whom 584 were included in the primary analysis ( n=294 ; n=290 ) . Median follow-up was 18.6 months ( IQR 11 - 25 ) in the trastuzumab plus chemotherapy group and 17.1 months ( 9 - 25 ) in the chemotherapy alone group . Median overall survival was 13.8 months ( 95 % CI 12 - 16 ) in those assigned to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy compared with 11.1 months ( 10 - 13 ) in those assigned to chemotherapy alone ( hazard ratio 0.74 ; 95 % CI 0.60 - 0.91 ; p=0.0046 ) . The most common adverse events in both groups were nausea  ( trastuzumab plus chemotherapy , 197 [ 67 % ] vs chemotherapy alone , 184 [ 63 % ] ) , vomiting ( 147 [ 50 % ] vs 134 [ 46 % ] ) , and neutropenia ( 157 [ 53 % ] vs 165 [ 57 % ] ) . Rates of overall grade 3 or 4 adverse events ( 201 [ 68 % ] vs 198 [ 68 % ] ) and cardiac adverse events ( 17 [ 6 % ] vs 18 [ 6 % ] ) did not differ between groups . INTERPRETATION Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy can be considered as a new st and ard option for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer . FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche BACKGROUND Treatment with cetuximab , a monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor , improves overall and progression-free survival and preserves the quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer that has not responded to chemotherapy . The mutation status of the K-ras gene in the tumor may affect the response to cetuximab and have treatment-independent prognostic value . METHODS We analyzed tumor sample s , obtained from 394 of 572 patients ( 68.9 % ) with colorectal cancer who were r and omly assigned to receive cetuximab plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone  , to look for activating mutations in exon 2 of the K-ras gene . We assessed whether the mutation status of the K-ras gene was associated with survival in the cetuximab and supportive-care groups . RESULTS Of the tumors evaluated for K-ras mutations , 42.3 % had at least one mutation in exon 2 of the gene . The effectiveness of cetuximab was significantly associated with K-ras mutation status ( P=0.01 and P<0.001 for the interaction of K-ras mutation status with overall survival and progression-free survival , respectively ) . In patients with wild-type K-ras tumors , treatment with cetuximab as compared with supportive care alone significantly improved overall survival ( median , 9.5 vs. 4.8 months ; hazard ratio for death , 0.55 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.41 to 0.74 ; P<0.001 ) and progression-free survival ( median , 3.7 months vs. 1.9 months ; hazard ratio for progression or death , 0.40 ; 95 % CI , 0.30 to 0.54 ; P<0.001 ) . Among patients with mutated K-ras tumors , there was no significant difference between those who were treated with cetuximab and those who received supportive care alone with respect to overall survival ( hazard ratio , 0.98 ; P=0.89 ) or progression-free survival ( hazard ratio , 0.99 ; P=0.96 ) . In the group of patients receiving best supportive care alone , the mutation status of the K-ras gene was not significantly associated with overall survival ( hazard ratio for death , 1.01 ; P=0.97 ) . CONCLUSIONS Patients with a colorectal tumor bearing mutated K-ras did not benefit from cetuximab , whereas patients with a tumor bearing wild-type K-ras did benefit from cetuximab . The mutation status of the K-ras gene had no influence on survival among patients treated with best supportive care alone . ( Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00079066 . BACKGROUND Cetuximab , an IgG1 chimeric monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) , has activity against colorectal cancers that express EGFR . METHODS From December 2003 to August 2005 , 572 patients who had colorectal cancer expressing immunohistochemically detectable EGFR and who had been previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine , irinotecan , and oxaliplatin or had contraindications to treatment with these drugs underwent r and omization to an initial dose of 400 mg of cetuximab per square meter of body-surface area followed by a weekly infusion of 250 mg per square meter plus best supportive care  ( 287 patients ) or best supportive care alone  ( 285 patients ) . The primary end point was overall survival . RESULTS In comparison with best supportive care alone , cetuximab treatment was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival ( hazard ratio for death , 0.77 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.64 to 0.92 ; P=0.005 ) and in progression-free survival ( hazard ratio for disease progression or death , 0.68 ; 95 % CI , 0.57 to 0.80 ; P<0.001 ) . These benefits were robust after adjustment in a multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model . The median overall survival was 6.1 months in the cetuximab group and 4.6 months in the group assigned to supportive care alone . Partial responses occurred in 23 patients ( 8.0 % ) in the cetuximab group but in none in the group assigned to supportive care alone ( P<0.001 ) ; the disease was stable in an additional 31.4 % of patients assigned to cetuximab and in 10.9 % of patients assigned to supportive care alone ( P<0.001 ) . Quality of life was better preserved in the cetuximab group , with less deterioration in physical function and global health status scores ( both P<0.05 ) . Cetuximab treatment was associated with a characteristic rash ; a rash of grade 2 or higher was strongly associated with improved survival ( hazard ratio for death , 0.33 ; 95 % CI , 0.22 to 0.50 ; P<0.001 ) . The incidence of any adverse event of grade 3 or higher was 78.5 % in the cetuximab group and 59.1 % in the group assigned to supportive care alone ( P<0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS Cetuximab improves overall survival and progression-free survival and preserves quality -of-life measures in patients with colorectal cancer in whom other treatments have failed . ( Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00079066 [ C 
    Output:
    
Targeted drugs with companion diagnostics are associated with improved safety , and tolerability .
Differences were most marked for gastrointestinal , cutaneous and neurological toxicity