***TASK***
the task is to simplify the input abstract of a biomedical literature

***INPUT***
the input is the abstract of a biomedical literature

***OUTPUT***
the output is the simplified abstract for the input abstract of a biomedical literature

***DOCUMENTATION***

***EXAMPLES***

Input: Nine trials met the inclusion criteria. Live birth rate per woman was significantly lower after IVF/ICSI with PGS compared to IVF/ICSI without PGS in women of advanced maternal age and in women with repeated IVF failure (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.81 and OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.88 respectively). In good prognosis patients a similar trend was seen, albeit not significant (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.26, random effects model). PGS as currently performed significantly decreases live birth rates in women of advanced maternal age and those with repeated IVF failure. Trials in which PGS was offered to women with a good prognosis suggested similar outcomes. PGS technique development is still ongoing in an effort to increase its efficacy. This involves biopsy at other stages of development (polar body or trophectoderm biopsy) and other methods of analysis (comparative genome hybridisation (CGH) or array-based technologies) than used by the trials included in this review. These new developments should be properly evaluated before their routine clinical application. Until such trials have been performed, PGS should not be offered as routine patient care in any form.
Output:

This review shows that PGS in fact decreases live birth rates in women of advanced maternal age and in women with repeated IVF failure. PGS should not be applied in routine patient care. New forms of PGS that perform the procedure at other stages of development and/or use a different method of analysis should first be evaluated in clinical trials before being introduced into clinical practice.