Values Education

This chapter analyses the role SRE plays in teaching values education and is among the central issues in pedagogic discourse and endeavours in many countries. The global debate regarding religious education in government schools has stimulated discussion in Australia around the merit of SRE and its place in contemporary Australian society. Providing SRE classes and their diverse religious backgrounds allows for a more intentional teaching and learning approach to fostering spirituality, religious belief and religious values. Values education is perceived as a pivotal means of ensuring the continuity of a society’s values (Dror “National Education” through mutually supportive educational devices: a case study of Zionist education. Peter Lang, New York, 2007). From the perspective of many educators, values education is at the heart of educational effort, going beyond technically transferring skills. Yet, on the other hand, some argue that values education is liable to result in political, religious or ideological indoctrination. This chapter will define the meaning of values education and discuss the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic values. It will outline the national framework for values education developed by the Australian government. This chapter will then analyse how SRE contributes to the Australian values framework. Research has shown that belief in a higher being, a key element in SRE, can contribute significantly to values education. This research will be examined, as well as responses from SRE educators across the states and territories, who have been interviewed through a qualitative research project.

relating to values. After examining the reactions of the interviewees from all the faiths in our study, we shall analyse how SRE/RI contributes to this values framework. Through retaining SRE/RI but encouraging a values education approach, students will be able to investigate what it means to be human and how to put this into action within their own individual belief system.

Values Education and Its Importance
The changing attitudes to SRE/RI represent the ongoing swinging of the pendulum in terms of educational policies, whether the focus should be religious versus scientific, or liberal versus vocational. Professor Terence Lovat argues that "the notion, therefore, that public education is part of a deep and ancient heritage around valuesneutrality is mistaken and in need of serious revision. The evidence suggests that the public education's initial conception was of being the complete educator, not only of young people's minds, but of their inner character as well" (Lovat 2010, p. 4).
A value is the "enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct or end-state of existence is personally or socially preferable to an opposite or converse mode of conduct or end-state of existence" (Rokeach 1973, p. 5). Klages (1988) suggests that due to rapid changes in the world as a result of modernisation and secularisation processes, there has been a transformation from what he calls nomo-centric understanding to auto-centric understanding.
Nomo-centric understanding means that the individual is captured, dependent and subdued by his environment, namely that one's existentiality is constructed through belonging, membership, duty and external values. Auto-centric understanding implies a self-reliant approach, where the individual strives for selfrealisation based on his personal judgement and rationality. Thus, auto-centric values characterise a modern approach, whereas nomo-centric values characterise a more traditional approach. Rokeach (1973) views values as hierarchical and distinguishes between two types of values: (1) terminal values (personal or social values) that individuals aspire to achieve throughout their lives; and (2) instrumental values (capacity values and moral values) that are expressions of forms of behaviour. He maintains that instrumental values may sometimes be a means for achieving terminal ones. Levy (1999) explains the possible ambiguity of Rokeach's (1973) definition by relying on facet theory: "a terminal value relates to a goal that is a destination in itself, while an instrumental value addresses a goal both as a destination in itself and as a more primary destination" (p. 81). Lamm (2001) maintains that a value is a criterion for preference (for example beauty, love of one's country, the sanctity of life) in a reality of conflict (that is, where there is no a priori consensus) between motivations of equivalent power (between two entities perceived as good or bad). If one is considered good and the second bad, there can be no consensus.
What transpires then, is that values are not neutral but are influenced by various social interests (Apple 2004), expressed in different conflictual situations. The school is perceived as an arena where different social groups struggle to implement their own criteria, priorities and values through diverse discourses. According to Lamm (2001), the school's role is not to transmit values but rather to use values as vehicles for transformation. Hence, the role of the school is "not to impart a binding set of values, but to nurture the individual's sensitivity to values" (p. 653).
The literature dealing with values emphasises commitment, sensitivity and openness to a life with a value-based nature. This creates a need to distinguish between intrinsic and extrinsic aspects of a value, with educational implications for the individual's world and as a mirror for reflecting different processes that society undergoes.

The Intrinsic or Extrinsic Dimension of a Value
In Protagoras, Plato distinguished between intrinsic values, those that the individual is interested in because of their own value, and extrinsic values, in which the individual is interested in order to achieve another goal (Taylor 1990).
In their research on the extrinsic and intrinsic dimension in a religious context, Beit-Hallahmi and Argyle (1997) found that people who held traditional values have a more extrinsic inclination, whereas those who considered themselves more modern had a stronger tendency to endorse intrinsic orientations. Religious people were more extrinsic than secular people, women were more extrinsic than men, and people from a lower socio-economic background with lower education levels were typically more extrinsic than those with more education and from higher socio-economic backgrounds. Sansone and Harackiewicz (2000) found that the context in which a person lives has a decisive influence on shaping his or her extrinsic or intrinsic motivation: "The social context can influence the goals adopted in a given situation, and can also create a more enduring climate that results in internalisation of values… which includes values as to what is interesting and worth pursuing" (p. 451).
The extrinsic-intrinsic dimension creates a polarised binary arena where discourses of a traditional or modern character about values are constructed and deconstructed (Gross 2012). According to Taylor (2004), these binaries should be revisited in the light of new theoretical hypotheses available in contemporary literature.

The Theoretical Development of Understandings of Values Education
Moral education has been a major part of religious education in the past. The term values education developed later, but the two concepts were initially considered to be almost identical. However, in traditional societies, the values which religious education focused on were established by God and obedience to them stood at the centre. These values are based on inexplicable but definable mystical principles and are based primarily on the believer's basic belief that because they come from a transcendent source they are true and do not need justification. The French Revolution introduced and implemented the concept of separation of church and state leading to increasing secularisation throughout the nineteenth and early twentieth century. This move to the secular state was further reinforced in the same period by the processes of modernisation, with the economic revolution, urbanisation, improved transportation and increasing literacy through the introduction of free, compulsory secular schools. As well, the rapid technological developments further contributed to a change of priorities and attitudes towards values, which brought about a fundamental change in the concept and the role of education.
Shachar (2019) argues that Emil Durkheim was the first philosopher and sociologist to contribute to this radical revolution in relation to the role of education. Durkheim (1925) argues that morality and religion are purely social phenomena and should be analysed with scientific tools, rather than through a purely religious lens of belief. In his book Moral Education (1925), Durkheim posits that in a modern world ruled by rationality, the moral elements hidden within the messages and agendas and religious teachings must be identified, assimilated and separated from the religious mystical world and made accessible to the modern-secular society in rational language. Durkheim focused on exploring what he called "social facts" that is, phenomena that exist only in society and do not exist in each individual. He argues that the definitions of moral behaviour should not be changed, but the context and language with which they come to educate needs to be modernised. In relation to moral principles (Shachar 2019, p. 40), Durkheim argued that they are rational and functional principles that aim to preserve social order.
In contrast to Durkheim, John Dewey ([1897] 1959), one of the key figures who developed the concepts of modern education, addressed values in the individual context and perceived the principles of morality as socially and culturally dependent. As such, he argued that moral principles can change according to the practical goals of education and they are an integral part of democratic negotiation. Thus, he rejected the idea of immutable moral values ordained by God.
Taking a different approach, Piaget (1932) was the first theorist to develop a psychological theory that analyses a person's moral development. He divided this development into two main stages: heteronomous and autonomous. In their early life children are driven to moral action by external orders, authoritative figures of religious authoritarian parents, which he defined as "heteronomous". As the child matures and throughout adulthood, his moral thinking becomes more independent and "autonomous". Kohlberg (1973Kohlberg ( , 1976) developed Piaget's intellectual development stages further. Within his two cognitive-developmental and moral reasoning stages, he delineated three more sub-stages in each phase (a total of six steps) that more accurately indicate the transition from heteronomy to autonomy. His theories did have some impact on Australian scholars and the private religious school system, particularly the Catholic system (Rossiter 2011).
Both Kohlberg and Piaget referred to values as universal entities. This approach was criticised by scholars who argued that, from a theoretical and empirical epistemological point of view, the cultural context in which values nest cannot be ignored (see, for example, Gibbs 2003). Rossiter (2011) also stressed that human spirituality is affected by the cultural meanings within any given society and this needs to be taken into account. Therefore, the socialisation processes in reality occur in specific local educational systems and cultural environments with diverse codes of ethics.
Inspired by the accelerated development of globalisation processes the central question that many researchers employed on the practical level was whether values are universal or culture-dependent so that they can build a better global society using similar behavioural and thought codes and shared values all over the world. One of the most important recent researchers, who promoted this field in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, as well as developing operational tools, is Schwartz and his colleagues. Schwartz (1994) defined values as "human goals that go beyond one condition or another, which have a different order of importance and name as guiding principles in the lives of individuals or groups." Schwartz (2009) identified ten values and defined them: self-directedness (thinking and independent actions: choice, creation and discovery); stimulation (excitement, novelty challenge in life); hedonism (pleasure and self-satisfaction); achievement (personal success and public proof of standards-appropriate skills); social power (social status and prestige, control over people or resources); safety (protection, harmony, confidence in the security of relationships with others and self); conservatism (avoidance of actions, tendencies and impulses that may or may not harm others, violation of laws, social expectations or norms); tradition (respect, commitment and acceptance of customs and beliefs that culture or religion holds); generosity; the well-being and promotion of people with whom there is a lasting personal connection; and universality (understanding, appreciation, tolerance and protection of the welfare of all people and nature).
The ten values distinguish two main values orientations: openness to conservatism with these values focused on society (including self-transcendence and conservatism); and individualism (self-promotion and openness to change). According to Schwartz's approach, there is no ideal concept of values and no absolute values, but values include a range of motives and behaviours ranging from self-centred to universal perception. Whereas Dewey, Piaget, and Kohlberg completely disregard the religious component Durkheim sees it as a sociological foundation and a central point from which universal social values derive. Schwartz and his colleagues suggest a midway where they identify in their theory a component they call "tradition" which they consider to be a value. However, according to their empirical findings, this value is connected to the conservative and conformity pole. While Durkheim sees religion as a source of reference and a point of departure for a meaningful life, Schwartz and his colleague see religion as an old-fashioned relic which they call traditionalism which resonates with the opposite of modernity, representing the conformist aspect of man. As such, they presents a unidimensional approach to tradition. This view of Schwartz and his co-researchers is, in our opinion, a limited approach that is imprisoned in the conception of the secular thesis that sees a temporally conformism stemming from outdated religious beliefs. This is completely detached from the dynamic view that perceives religion as a lively, relevant and dynamic matter (see Gross 2015;Gross and Rutland 2014;Jackson 1997). Durkheim understood that religion still has a central place in the functional paradigm that he developed even though he did not develop a compatible educational approach because he was a sociologist, not an educator. The sociologists who followed him have abandoned this approach in favour of post-modern paradigms that centre on conflict theory and the question of power. These approaches and the theoretical paradigm shift in sociology from a functionalist approach to conflict paradigm have ignored the fact that, de facto, religion is still a central component in the regulation of social and political issues and has a central place in the human psyche of religious people who choose to lead meaningful religious lives albeit within modernity. As Salman (2002) has pointed out, whilst there is largely consensus about the core, secular educational values, "the concept of incorporating spiritual and religious values continues to generate a greater level of ambivalence and discord among different groups" (Salman 2002, 116).
Schwartz and his colleagues presented a binary approach towards religiosity. The reason for these findings may be due to the research method they used, since Schwartz's and his colleagues utilise a quantitatively positivist approach. Yet, quantitative questions cannot provide the depth needed to understand reality in a more complex constructivist manner. Qualitative studies, on the other hand, answer broader questions and allow for a "thick description" and a broader spectrum of answers beyond Likert's scale, allowing for a deeper discussion of questions of religious values education (Gross 2013) and as seen in the current study.
Hana Shachar's book (2019) also aims to contribute to the scholarship of values education yet she does not mention at all the possibility that values education can be taught in conjunction with religious education. This option is perceived as belonging to the past era of Durkheim and it does not have a place in the postmodern era (Oser 1999). This positioning reflects the lack of understanding that religious education can intersect with values education and can enrich it. Thus, this chapter aims to investigate further the role of religion in terms of values education across six main faiths in the postmodern era in Australia. In addition, it will investigate the role of parents who are actively choosing to send their children to SRE/RI classes, given the voluntary nature of these classes and family/school partnerships.

Family/School Partnerships and Values Education
Values are not innate but are acquired. Scholars argue that the most influential factor upon students' socialisation is the family. Values acquisition starts at home where children are exposed to the moral behaviour of their parents as role models so that children develop much of their identities and their beliefs about right and wrong before starting their formal schooling (Brannon 2008;Rokeach 1973). Berkowitz and Bier (2005) argue that although school has a central role in developing students' character, the most profound impact on students' development comes from family, notably from their parents whether in social, moral, behavioural, or academic development.
Children's moral development is a shared responsibility between school, parents and the entire community. When teachers want to teach values education they are suspected of imposing their values through manipulation. If values education is a shared responsibility, it means that parents and schools need to negotiate their shared values while creating a vital and meaningful discourse about those values. The main condition for a successful values education program is role models. If both the parents and teachers are role models that are consistent in their approach, the transmission of values will be facilitated as there is a need for continuity.
Also, in a research project conducted among Israeli kibbutzim students, Gross (1995) found that the students who were brought up in the more ideological kibbutzim (collective living) had a more ideological orientation toward values than among students who came from mixed backgrounds of different ideological movements where the school administration opposed the raising of ideological issues. Thus, Gross concluded that a strong ideological and spiritual connection between the home and the school setting, which students are exposed to, impacts on their spiritual, ideological and value-laden development. This is because through socialisation in the home and the community they develop a priori their ideological interpretation which is then nourished by socialisation in the school.
Erikson (1950,1968) argues that the most important factors in identity maintenance are sameness and continuity. There is a need for a close and enduring connection between what is taught at school and what is advocated and practised at home. When this condition is missing, namely when the values taught at school are not an integral part of the home environment, they might lose their relevance. When the home resonates with the school values and vice versa, schools become an abridged version of home, a safe place. Schools can act as a comfort zone as long as there is no dissonance between the school and home values. When values which are imparted at school are not reinforced at home they become meaningless (Lickona 1997). The fact that parents meet together to join forces with the school creates a support group for the parents and thus they can build together a community of wisdom and resilience.
The development of home/school relations is not only a matter of the need for parental involvement but rather is considered to be "an integral part of the concept of parental choice and accountability" (Passy 2005, p. 723). Parental choice in relation to values education starts when the parents choose to be or not to be engaged in school activities. Their choice reflects the priorities of their values.

Parental Values, Religiosity and School Choice
Parental choice of schools is considered one of the most significant issues in school research. The dramatic changes that are occurring across the globe in the economic, social, cultural, religious and especially advanced home schooling technology have led to paradigmatic shifts in parental choice research (Boterman et al. 2019;McCarthy 2016). The impact of key ethical factors has become a central question as it has a direct impact on the values of equality and social justice (Barsky 2019;Banks 2012). The relationship between ethics and teaching is associated with the professionalisation process of teaching (Adkoli 2019). Professional teaching is supposed to take into account the needs of the target population as a prerequisite and especially the needs of parents who are considered the main consumers of the educational "market".
Academic achievement is very important for parents. Yet, because there are many institutions which are available and are excellent academically, parental choice is also heavily influenced by the values schools cater for and by the school ethics and not only by their academic achievements. Parents are looking for alignment between their values and the schools' ethos since such compatibility is important for them (Passy 2005). Such an alignment between the behavioural codes and cultural values of schools and parents needs to be reflected in the "pedagogical commodities" (Bunar 2010) that are exchanged in the educational market. The increase in home schooling also shows the need of parents to be involved in their children's values education. This is even more apparent in the hybrid home schooling where parents are looking to "gain a fuller picture of their values and motivations" (Wearne 2016, p. 378). Therefore, parental expectations from schools is connected to their own values (Miller et al. 2016).
Within the broader issue of values, parent's religiosity is considered to be a major factor in their school choice (Reichard 2012) as they feel that this contributes to the wellness of their children. This is very significant for Jewish parents (see Miller et al. 2016) and Muslim parents (Dronkers 2016), but also influences other religious groups in their school choice.
The main issue that concerns schools today is the question of whether the school respects parental rights to think differently in terms of their values or not. School cannot violate parental rights to maintain within its framework their beliefs and values (Lickona 1997). In many studies, the influence of parents on the religious development of their children's worldview and values has been found to be very powerful (Leonard et al. 2013;Lickona 1988). This includes parents' school choice when a particular religious definition (Gross 2012) has a decisive influence on the child's religious identity due to the values that the school imparts, particularly when there is a strong synergy between school and home (Miller et al. 2016;Dronkers 2016). At the same time, parents' religious definitional expectations can have a decisive influence on how the school is conducted in terms of both the formal and informal curriculum. As discussed in Chap. 3, this issue is very relevant in terms of the choice which is offered to parents in New South Wales between SRE, Ethics and No Religion, for religious families, for those who wish to retain some form of religious traditional values and for the "nones".
In fact, the full range of effects on the child and learning can be learned from Bronfenbrenner's (1979) multi-sustained ecological theory, which was inspired by both Vygotsky's (1978) theories that child development can be analysed either within a limited or broader context of the environment in which it occurs (see Chap. 1). The environment is impacted by a number of micro, macro and mezzo dimensions and these, in turn, have a significant impact on the child's world, values and education. A child's values are directly influenced by the child's interactions with the micro, macro and mezzo factors.
The immediate (micro) environment includes the nuclear or extended family, the peer group and their relationships such as parent-teacher relationship, parent and peer group, nuclear family and extended family. The experiences of the child in the immediate family, the religious community, youth group and place of worship (Gross 2013;Waghid and Davids 2014) have a far-reaching impact on their religious beliefs and values (Francis 2005), especially when combined with the education that their parents want to give them (Lickona 1988) and the values they impart.
In addition, there is the impact on values development of the more global (macro) context, such as natural phenomena, epidemics (Coronavirus is a case study), broader economic and social phenomena, the atmosphere, the universe, communication, beliefs (such as secularism) and social ideologies (capitalism, socialism and communism). These all have a far-reaching influence on the shaping of the student's religious identity, values, and religious education within which he grows.
As well, the mezzo dimension, namely the relationship between the connections in the immediate environment and the existing institutions, such as family and schools and the residential area, the community and religious establishments, can be seen to have a far-reaching impact on religious identity, values and education.
The impact of these different ecosystems influences the values and religious education curriculum that the school provides for the child through these complex relationships and interactions (Francis 2005;Gross 2011). However, with the growing secularisation, individuation and consequent decline of traditional religious institutions, parents face the challenge of how to develop their children's values in the postmodern world. This is further complicated by the media, which transmits contradictory values from those of religion. These contradictory and contested trends also pose challenges to schooling both in terms of curriculum development and pedagogy. The powers of the macro (the general global society and its complex media) and the micro (the nuclear and extended family) as well as the inter-institutional relationships of the mezzo, create pressure on students and parents because of contradictory value systems that affect the quality and the nature of schools and religious education all over the world (Waghid and Davids 2014). The decline of religious beliefs and values has also created a dilemma in terms of the meaning and purpose of life for young people.

The Search for Meaning
A key element in terms of beliefs and values is the students' need to understand the meaning and purpose of life. Crawford and Rossiter (2006) argue that "For religious people, their beliefs form a core of meaning. They interpret life from a religious perspective. But for many, especially youth, religion-a principal traditional source of meaning-does not have the same cogency or credibility it seems to have in the past" (6). Instead the focus on the good life and individualism undermines the traditional support structures that previously created a sense of the meaning and purpose in life. However, efforts to introduce courses about the different religions, which could have at least enabled a better understanding about the role religion plays in terms of the meaning of life, in addition to developing intercultural competence which is part of values education (Lovat et al. 2002), have largely failed in Australian government schools. As a result, students in these schools can be disadvantaged (Crawford and Rossiter 2006).
These issues are important in terms of parents opting into SRE/RI for their children, as will be discussed in the findings of our study, where both graduates and teachers stressed the centrality of these classes for the development of the students' value system in terms of complementing the government's framework for values of education.

National Framework for Values Education
By the late 1980s, Australian states began to see the teaching of morality and values as being part of the state government's responsibility and in 1991 New South Wales introduced a new element into the curriculum with a program called "The Values We Teach" (Lovat and Schofield 1998;Pascoe 2002). As Australia entered the twentyfirst century, the Commonwealth Government became concerned at the increasing challenges within society with problems of broken marriages, dysfunctional families, drug problems, crime, inter-ethnic tensions and religious fundamentalism (Hill 2010, p. 646 The government undertook a study of these issues and, in 2004, decided to introduce the "National Framework for Values Education", making Australia a world leader in providing government funding for this important pedagogic approach. The National Framework sets out nine key values defined as follows:

Nine Values for Australian Schooling
1. Care and Compassion-Care for self and others. 2. Doing Your Best-Seek to accomplish something worthy and admirable, try hard, pursue excellence. 3. Fair Go-Pursue and protect the common good where all people are treated fairly for a just society. 4. Freedom-Enjoy all the rights and privileges of Australian citizenship free from unnecessary interference or control, and stand up for the rights of others. 5. Honesty and Trustworthiness-Be honest, sincere and seek the truth. 6. Integrity-Act in accordance with principles of moral and ethical conduct, ensure consistency between words and deeds. 7. Respect-Treat others with consideration and regard, respect another person's point of view. 8. Responsibility-Be accountable for one's own actions, resolve differences in constructive, non-violent and peaceful ways, contribute to society and to civic life, take care of the environment. 9. Understanding, Tolerance and Inclusion-Be aware of others and their cultures, accept diversity within a democratic society, being included and including others (National Framework 2005, p. 4).
The Framework also sets out the key elements and approaches to inform good practice in values education. These include school planning, partnerships within the school community, whole school approach, safe and supportive learning environment, support for students, and quality teaching.
In 2004, the government invested significant funding to enable the implementation of this framework (Toomey 2010, pp. 20-21), as well as facilitating research to evaluate the impact of the new approach to values education. The Stage 2 Australian Final Report (DEEWR 2008) stated: Starting from the premise that schooling educates for the whole child and must necessarily engage a student's heart, mind and actions, effective values education empowers student decision making, fosters student action and assigns real student responsibility. Effective values education is not an academic exercise; it needs to be deeply personal, deeply real and deeply engaging. (p. 11) However, Rossiter (2011) points out that there are two challenges in the government's approach. The first is the need to differentiate between "values in education," that is the values fostered by the school community, and "education in values", that is the teaching and learning about values. The second challenge is that creating personal change in students is much more complex than just teaching those values, since cognitive knowledge may not lead to behavioural change.
A specific case study of a Catholic primary school which introduced the National Framework's program for values education found that it produced significant positive results in the teaching and learning of the students as well as in the overall school climate and student wellbeing (Toomey 2010). This study attested to the effectiveness of values education, which in this case was also offered within the religious context of a Catholic school. It reinforced the earlier findings of Lovat and Schofield (1998) that such programs can make a difference. In a quantitative study they found that this difference was only in one area, the educational field, and did not apply to the other two areas in the curriculum, self/others and civic responsibility. These results were found to apply, even when teachers were not strongly supportive of the new program.
Secularists within the academic and broader community believe that nonconfessional religious education in government schools can achieve the positive results of religious education and values through the development of a broad, liberal, spiritual understanding. In her controversial book, Unsafe Gods (2014), Lynn Davies argues that religion is irrelevant because it is the source of violence and fundamentalism and that schools should foster values education systematically to substitute values and religious education over time.
In a 2018 lecture at the International Seminar of Religious Education and Values, Judy Miller argues that non-confessional RE does not specifically aim "to nurture belief, promote community cohesion, find truth, develop character, increase a sense of identity, gain knowledge or deepen spirituality even if, during the process, it contributes to some or all of those." Yet, these are the very elements fostered directly by SRE, which of course includes values education which was seen as central by all the interviewees across the six faith traditions, as will be discussed in the next section.

Findings
The respondents from all the different faith traditions stressed the key role that SRE/RI plays in conveying an understanding of values, virtues, morality, an ethical lifestyle. As well, they believed they taught the students right from wrong with a stress on "living a moral life with positive values" (female SRE teacher, #4 Jewish, New South Wales). Similarly, a Muslim interviewee commented: "So with SRI, I think all religions have moral components, and that is the foremost thing that we will teach in these classes" This teacher stressed that due to the limited contact time for an SRE/RI class "you distil the whole teachings into something that they can bring to their life, something they can practice in their daily life. So most of that would be values and morals" (female RI teacher, #4 Muslim, Queensland).
There is a commonality of key values across the traditions, although clearly the sources for each tradition referred to are different. Both the Jewish and Christian interviewees referred to the importance of the ten commandments and the bible, but the Christians also stressed the role of Jesus and the concepts of grace and being Good Samaritans as well. For Islam, their sources were the Quran and the life and sayings of Muhammed (the Hadith); for Baha'i it was the teachings of their founder; for Hinduism their scriptures and the concept of "dharma", that is the right way of living; and for Buddhism the teachings of Buddha, with the concept of the six principles of perfection (generosity, morality, patience and meditation, vigour and effort, and wisdom). As well, in Buddhism there is the concept of the four Noble Truths, relating to suffering and how to overcome it through the eightfold path of good behaviour.
One Hindu teacher explained that "the scripture, what I am teaching at the moment, in that we strongly understand the principles of dharma, that what dharma you are doing at the moment, it is going to come in front of you. It's like a boomerang. So, if you are doing wrong things, wrong things will come in front of you. If you are doing right things, right things will come in front of you. And when kids are learning all these things from the beginning, it will help them to deal with people nicely, to be a good person" (SRE teacher, #2 Hindu, New South Wales).
The important moral messages, described by one Baha'i teacher as "the treasures of kindness and truthfulness and respect and love and honesty" (female SRE teacher, #4 Baha'i, New South Wales) did impact on the students. One Baha'i graduate commented in relation to values: Another explained the concept of virtues or values in Baha'i belief: "[they] are kind of like gems inside us that all of us have but we just need to shine them so we can show that we can all be nice, kind, compassionate. We can all be courageous, detached, all of those things" (female SRE graduate, #3 Baha'i, New South Wales).
The New South Wales Buddhist SRE curriculum, "Values for Life", focuses on the Buddhist saying: "we only do good deeds; we avoid evil and we purify our minds" (female SRE teacher, #7 Buddhist, New South Wales). One Buddhist teacher used the analogy of a garden in terms of good and bad deeds. He explained that each week he asked the children "How's your garden been this week? Have you been looking after it? Are you planting good seeds? If you plant enough good seeds then the weeds don't grow" (male SRE teacher, #3 Buddhist, New South Wales).
The foundations for these values emerged from the individual faith systems, as one Christian interviewee explained that for them values are "built on the foundation of Christ; for someone else it would be a different framework and foundation from their faith perspective" (female SRE teacher, #14 Christian, Victoria). All faiths start "from the premise that they've got seeds of good to plant" (male SRE director, #16 Christian, New South Wales). The fact that there is a clear religious framework that provides an "underpinning for picking up values in the first place" was seen as fundamentally important (male SRE teacher, #1 Christian, New South Wales).

Major Values
All stressed the same characteristics, including not to murder or steal, the importance of respecting others, care and compassion, including taking care of the environment, having a sense of responsibility, righteousness, including the importance of honesty and truth. These values were seen as being important in developing good citizens and for humanity, although sometimes there was a different emphasis, as shall be discussed below.

Respect
The concept of respect was seen as a key value, and was often presented within the school context. One interviewee explained: In our Hindu culture we basically say not to step on books and we try to see that books is like a form of God and because it gives us a lot of knowledge. [This value includes] respecting people around you and our belongings and when you translate that to a government school setting, it's good because you won't have kids chucking their books and property or other people's property around. So it aligns with that sense of discipline and is taught in a religious way to say, OK, don't kick your books because it is a form of God. (SRE teacher, #5 Hindu, New South Wales) She added that this concept of respect for books can be expanded to respect for everything that is around and not just for books: Respect your parents, making sure not to talk back to them or say anything that's abusive or rude and having that respect for elders translates after [school] as well when we start talking to our bosses or anyone who's a little bit older than us in the workplace … so SRE provides that valued education that does translate out of school and into the workplace. (SRE teacher,#5 Hindu,New South Wales) Islamic education also talks about the importance of respect, "obeying parents, respecting the spouse, respecting the neighbours, respecting the other faith people… And also in our religion, we live in a country where it's not Islamic country that we have to respect the land of the law [sic]" (male RE director, #9 Muslim, Tasmania). This Muslim perspective was reinforced by a Muslim graduate: "The Islamic faith teaches us to respect our teachers, to study, to become educated. It's a fundamental part of our religion. So the program will teach us to respect our teachers, to do all these things. We'll become better students" (male SRE graduate/teacher, #6 Muslim, New South Wales).
Respect is also a key concept in Judaism. One of the ten commandments stresses the importance of respecting ones' parents. One of our Jewish interviewees particularly stressed that this is the only commandment which offers a reward because the text says, "so that your days will be long on the earth".
Similarly, in Christianity, many of the interviewees stressed the importance of respect, including respect for teachers. One interviewee responded with the question she asked her students: "What about when you are in the classroom? How are you going to respond there? So we talk about values and changes, how we act" (female SRE teacher, #5 Christian, New South Wales). A Christian director focused more on the broader aspects of respecting all, regardless of ethnic or religious background. In terms of SRE, he commented that when the students "eventually leave that program [SRE classes] with some sort of respect for each other, [this] is really what we're trying to replicate here" (male SRE director, #16 Christian, New South Wales).
In Buddhism, respect is a central concept, including respect for life, for the law and for other people's property. It also includes "no consuming alcohol and any kinds of drugs, that is actually respect for one's own body" (female SRE teacher, #8 Buddhist, New South Wales).
Yet, interwoven with the concept of respect is that of loving kindness, care and compassion.

Loving Kindness, Care and Compassion
Central to all religions is the concept of being kind, demonstrating care, compassion, generosity, the desire to help others, and love. As one Hindu SRE teacher expressed it, that in addition to academic results, "we want a human being, good human beings which are helping others, understanding others, and that role SRE does" (female SRE teacher, #2 Hindu, New South Wales). In Buddhist SRE the importance of generosity and the concept of "loving kindness" are stressed as key values. Loving kindness is presented as being important not only in words, but also in actions, such as thanking one's mother for the food, and saying "Oh, the food is yummy, the food is beautiful. I shall eat it all" or showing love by practical actions "helping her, cleaning the house, speaking nicely to her" (female SRE teacher, #2 Buddhist, New South Wales). So, much of the focus in Buddhist SRE is about "loving kindness and compassion, and giving, being generous and sharing, and mostly they will do meditation on lovingkindness" (female SRE teacher, #7 Buddhist, New South Wales).
Baha'i SRE also stresses the importance of helping others in very practical ways, and children are encouraged to share in class different ways that they had helped their mother during the week, such as emptying the dishwasher, or helping other members of their family or friends.
In terms of pedagogy, one Christian interviewee explained from his experience as a student the way that one of his SRE teachers, an older gentleman, sought to convey the message of the importance of being kind to others through the medium of songs and stories: He'd bring his accordion and play songs and we'd sing, and we'd learn different things. There was something of seeing a faith practitioner come in and learn how he interacted with the world, and be able to copy that… And so part of our value structure is that faith is important, and it's something that needs to be passed on from one generation to the next. So he would run a classroom where we were kind to one another. So he was modelling the values and teaching them. (male SRE graduate/teacher, #1 Christian, New South Wales) Within the Christian context, our interviewees all stressed the story of the Good Samaritan, especially when pressed to give examples of teaching the values of care and compassion. This is something strongly embedded in Christian tradition and culture.
This concept of taking care also extended to the environment for some of our interviewees. The role of nature and its importance of looking after the earth and the universe was also stressed as a key value by a number of the interviewees, especially from the Eastern religions including Hinduism and Buddhism. A number of the Buddhist interviewees spoke about the environment, because many of his teachings stressed the importance of taking care of the earth: When we speak about resources, we also value natural environments, where we teach them to respect the land, because we human beings are connected, interdependent… We don't own this country, this land. We are part of the ecosystem. (female SRE teacher, #8 Buddhist, New South Wales) In conveying this message of taking care of the environment, the concept of responsibility was stressed as another key value.

Responsibility
This was a key theme within many of the religions. For example in Hinduism, the concept of dharma includes the idea that each individual has duties, responsibilities and privileges, depending on their role in life. One teacher explained that to fully understand the Hindu religious texts, Vedas, one needed a "lifelong study", so the only thing one can teach to the students is the value of responsibility "how they contribute as an individual to the home, individual to the society, individual to the school… That is the only thing that we can teach, and we are trying our level best to teach those values in our SRE education system" (female SRE teacher, #4 Hindu, New South Wales).
One of the Buddhist teachers commented further: … it's actually the value of taking responsibility… You don't actually say oh, it's his fault, the government is actually not doing their blah, blah, blah. You don't complain. You don't just sit around and wasting your breath, and wasting the government resources. (female SRE teacher, #8 Buddhist, New South Wales) Included in responsible action is to ensure that one tells the truth, this being part of the broader concept of righteousness, central to religious beliefs.

Righteousness
Another key value is that of righteousness, which includes the concepts of justice, of being honest, of telling the truth, being fair and standing up for what is right even if that is difficult. In particular, our interviewees stressed honesty and truth as basic and important values. A Buddhist teacher explained that "lying is another one… you don't go around lying. You know that you are honouring your word… like the four noble truths and the eight noble paths, they go hand-in-hand" (female SRE teacher, #8 Buddhist, New South Wales). A Baha'i teacher stressed that "children learn, for example, that truthfulness is the foundation of all human virtues" (female SRE teacher, #4 Baha'i, New South Wales).
A Muslim teacher explained further: "Okay, alright, so one of the teachings of Islam is we have to be honest. So there's a saying of our Prophet, Muhammad, 'tell the truth even if it is bitter'… Being an honest person is at the end of the day not only the reward you get in this world, but it's also something that you will be rewarded in the hereafter… at the end of the day, it will be the best outcome" (female RI teacher, #4 Muslim, Queensland).
The Jewish SRE teachers drew on Jewish history to expand the concept of righteousness, especially in relation to playground bullying. One Jewish SRE teacher draws on the concept from the Holocaust of not being a bystander, as she explained: We can look at stories from the Holocaust and we can see antisemitism and being a bystander in those situations can replicate the school environment in the exact same way, how the German citizens weren't standing up for Jews and there were a lot of people who would not do anything about this whole problem in Europe. So, it's important to stand up and say something if you see something going [wrong] going on. (female SRE graduate/teacher, #1 Jewish, New South Wales) Another Jewish SRE teacher explained that for her, teaching about the dilemmas that students face is about teaching how students can get along with others so "there can be peace on this earth [if we all] just work together, because that is good" (female SRE teacher, #5 Jewish, New South Wales). This approach produces both good citizens and is valuable for humanity.

Being Good Citizens and Part of Humanity
The interviewees stressed that ensuring their students absorbed and practiced positive values would produce good citizens. One Baha'i interviewee expressed this as follows: Well, I am sure it's the same with other faiths as well. As far as we are concerned, we teach them values and virtues of compassion and kindness, and generosity and friendliness and helpfulness, helping your fellow human beings and being kind… developing an understanding in children that we're all human family. (male SRE teacher, #5 Baha'i, New South Wales) A Christian interviewee added: Now, Christianity or faith isn't the only place where we can get those [values] but it is a strong place where they can get that and that can flow through to all parts of their lives. And by having that values basis that helps them to be good citizens now and into the future. (male SRE director, #15 Christian, New South Wales) Similarly, in Buddhism, interviewees stressed the importance of following the law and that their approach in SRE is to teach the key values so that their students will grow up to be good citizens. As one interviewee expressed it: "You actually need to be a good citizen where you take responsibility, you pick up rubbish, you respect the law, and you don't-what's the word-you work" (female SRE teacher, #8 Buddhist, New South Wales).
As discussed, these major values were discussed within the framework of each faith community's belief system and understandings.

Key Factors in Teaching Values in SRE
When asked what differentiated teaching values in SRE/RI from imparting values in the general curriculum, two major factors were stressed: belief in a higher being and the key role of religious scriptures and teachings.

Belief in God
In terms of understanding the centrality of values to the student's lives, the importance of belief in a caring God was stressed by the interviewees from different faith traditions.
In Hinduism the role of God and of the Scriptures is seen as very important in teaching values, as one teacher explained: For kids, we basically use the word God and show them pictures of what God would look like so that they can imagine that there's someone a little bit higher than themselves… Don't steal because God is watching over you so they have a little bit of fear… But as we grow older we start to realise, OK, this may not be physical … It's more a spiritual thing". (SRE teacher,#5 Hindu,New South Wales) This interviewee explained that as students grow older, they need to also see the rationality of values and not just the threat of heaven and hell. At the same time, she felt that the understanding that there is something "a little bit higher" is very important (SRE teacher, #5 Hindu, New South Wales).
In Islam, belief in God and his messengers is also seen as central, as expressed in the Six Pillars of Faith [Iman]. One of the teachers explained: We need to be able to understand the messengers and that the key to success in every facet of our life is faith and to have a good understanding of faith. And having that faith affects what you do and what you say… So whether we do that spiritually by making extra supplications or doing our prayers on time so things like that we're trying to bring into each of the lessons. (female SRE teacher, #1 Islamic, New South Wales) Similarly a Baha'i interviewee responded to the question on values: "And we need connecting to God as the Creator. We must pray and converse with God. And I think that this part of education is very necessary for people here [in Australia]" (male SRE teacher, #1 Baha'i, New South Wales).
Other interviewees argued that without a belief in God, values could also be very subjective: I think that without God you can't have morality. It just doesn't make sense, logically. If you follow it through to its conclusion, if there is no God, and there is no divine being who has declared what is right and what is wrong… If that doesn't exist, then there is no onus on human beings to be decent or kind to each other, or to put other people first, or to show compassion or love or service. It just makes sense to look out for number one [yourself] and do your own thing". (female SRE teacher, #4 Christian, New South Wales) Another Christian interviewee explained: … to have a moral framework without an understanding of who the moral guardian of that framework is leaves the students bereft and almost loses the impact of that value because that value becomes subjective… So if you think about the moral laws given by God in the Christian faith, there's a clear context and understanding why God says, "Love your neighbour" and it's not just because it's a nice thing. (male SRE teacher, #12 Christian, Victoria) However, belief in God was not seen as the only factor-the role of the written scriptures was also seen as very important.

Role of Scripture
Scriptural traditions, which often go back millennia, are central, because they convey key moral messages. As one Muslim teacher explained: "And also that there's guidelines in their life as well which is a positive thing for children to know that there's a direction" (female SRE teacher, #2 Muslim, Queensland).
In the Hindu scriptures one teacher explained there are the concepts of Itihas-Puranas [narrations from the past]: If you want to know something you have to go by what is documented in the scriptures. You can question and say today that it's not at all -it might not have happened at all. The same thing can be argued, even today -I write something and in a hundred years' time, somebody might come and deny that this ever happened… you can't just pluck something out of thin air and learn, but you've got to go by examples of living, which is demonstrated to you by the various things in the past which is through the Hindu scriptures. (male SRE teacher, #3 Hindu, New South Wales) Christian interviewees also stressed the importance of scripture, in this case the biblical stories from both the Hebrew and Christian Bibles, so that "the values are taught as part of a bigger story and don't just sit on their own" (female SRE teacher, #13 Christian, Victoria) and "young people don't have to make up all their values" (male SRE director, #15 Christian, New South Wales). As another explained "I mean, if I looked for values in myself, they would be amiss. It's much better to hear values from a book. You know, for us it's the bible, but from a book outside ourselves" (female SRE teacher, #5 Christian, New South Wales). As such scriptures provide an "anchor", as another Christian teacher explained: So I think that the values are like the fruit of a tree. And if you don't have the tree you don't have the fruit or the fruit falls off and it goes rotten and it just sits on the ground and disintegrates. And I think that's how values are. And if we don't anchor it to something concrete then the values will dissipate and … how can you tell a child, 'Oh, you should be nice to another child just because I say so' or 'because that might mean they're nice back to you instead of being nasty'. (female SRE teacher, #11 Christian, Victoria) Similar sentiments were expressed by Buddhist teachers: Well, for me the Buddhist values can't be separated from the tradition they come from. Yes, you can teach ethics, but I think the greater value for me is teaching those values within the context of the tradition that it comes from… it's giving them that background". (female SRE teacher, #4 Buddhist, New South Wales) Thus, the scriptures provide a framework for teaching and learning the key values which are integrated into a tradition that goes back over millennia, and the interviewees stressed the advantages of this approach.

Advantages of Teaching Values in SRE/RI
The interviewees outlined a number of advantages for teaching values through SRE/RI for the secular teachers, for providing meaning in life and for reinforcing home values.

Benefits for Government Schools
The SRE/RI teachers also stressed that the values they were teaching could complement and reinforce the government mandated values, especially since "schoolteachers have a lot of pressure nowadays, not only do they have to teach the academic subjects, mathematics, English and so on, but they also have a lot of administrative work" (female SRE teacher, #4 Buddhist, New South Wales).
In contrast, they argued that teaching values is a key focus in SRE and that this is often appreciated by the classroom teachers. One Baha'i teacher commented: "And it's interesting that the teachers who are sitting in the classroom they get so engaged in the actual lesson that we cannot believe that they are so interested" (female SRE teacher, #4 Baha'i, New South Wales).
Similarly, the Muslim interviewees described how the classroom teachers who were sitting in on the SRE classes also got involved in the lessons. One teacher commented: "I cannot count how many times that I have been teaching scripture in a class and I've got the secular teachers nodding their head, approving and sometimes even joining, butting in and speaking to the students and saying, yeah, well, see, this is what your religion is about. Your religion tells you to implement what we ask you to do in school in terms of gaining knowledge in terms of discipline, behaviour, respect and all those things" (female SRE teacher, #5 Muslim, New South Wales).
In a number of cases, the interviewees explained how their lessons can help the students to value and respect their teachers. One Baha'i teacher explained that every year to mark the World Teachers' day he teaches the children a song "basically showing appreciation of teachers, and they perform it in front of the school assem-bly… It's about the value of education and the role teachers play. The children will give a speech or something, and they will give the teachers little presents as well, just as a token" (male SRE teacher, #5 Baha'i, New South Wales).
In another example, one Muslim graduate/teacher described how he had just given a lesson on the importance in Islam of treating teachers, fellow students and their school with respect "and I walked past a classroom and the teacher was actually speaking to students about what was taught today. So that shows there's a bit of connection between the students and the teachers about what's being taught and what they do take out of those classes" (male SRE graduate/teacher, #7 Muslim, New South Wales). His friend and colleague added: A few teachers from the school we used to go to had issues with the Muslim students in particular with these behavioural things. I believe having an outsider coming and teaching Islamic rulings, faiths, morals, values and all that stuff teaches them how to behave properly. So I think it's more of a respect thing, having someone else come in other than a teacher teaching you what to do. (male SRE graduate/teacher, #6 Muslim, New South Wales) The Christian interviewees also explained how SRE could reinforce the general values curriculum because "the bible stories back-up what the school is teaching about values" (female SRE teacher, #10 Christian, Victoria). Another Christian interviewee who had trained as a secular teacher also stressed how the values taught in SRE align well and reinforce the rest of the values education that comes through the broader curriculum of the Department of Education, "so there is really a nice crossover in many ways to help enrich that values education". When asked to elaborate on this point, she responded: "I think it actually helps to embed it in whole of life, that it doesn't become something that's a detached subject but very much embedded into life practices of the faith tradition" (female SRE graduate/teacher, #9 Christian, New South Wales).
In this way, the involvement of SRE teachers and classes provide a grounding and help to reinforce key values within the school system. The interviewees also stressed that as well their classes help the students understand the meaning of life.

Meaning of Life
A number of the interviewees stressed that the lack of belief and an understanding of values resulted in young people having no insight into the meaning of life, often leading to self-harm. One Hindu teacher explained: "They don't have much value in their life… They really don't know why I am doing what I'm doing, and if I have to speak truth, why do I have to speak truth? If I have to be loyal, why do I have to be loyal? They have no understanding of the values" (female SRE teacher, #2 Hindu, New South Wales).
Another Hindu teacher added: But the real value of how you interact with people and with nature, and what is the importance of knowing yourself, basically who the person you really are, and how you are connected to the universe, where do you come from, where do you go from here to somewhere else, and what is the meaning of life. And all these kind of things, unfortunately are not powered by the day to day subjects which they teach in schools. That is what is essential for your progress in life, apart from the earning and living capacity. (male SRE teacher, #3 Hindu, New South Wales) He elaborated further that there is suffering in the world, "so many plusses and minuses are happening in society, what is the meaning of all these things… You can't explain all these things. Science can go only up to a certain point. Beyond that, science cannot explain about the soul, souls on the planet. These things are brought about by scripture" (male SRE teacher, #3 Hindu, New South Wales). The concern about the nihilism in the secular, globalised world and the way that religious beliefs can also counteract this negativity and provide meaning to life was also stressed by the Muslim interviewees. One interviewee explained: I think it's enormous… You have a lot of children searching, looking for that source of comfort in a very, very confusing day and age today. And we're very … they're very stimulated by these electronics. They're in a pixel world, this façade and you need to … you're giving them something that's real and solid, that's not fake. You're telling them things that are of truth and value and they're losing a lot of that with this world of … So you're sort of bringing them back to … really grounding them, like you're grounding them back to earth, like come back to the reality of what life is and what really matters. (female SRE teacher, #3 Muslim, New South Wales) She commented further that she encourages her students "to remember God. He'll be with you. But when you forget Him… you'll forget who you are and you'll become very lost… So that's what we concentrate on, developing a relationship with our Creator in the sense that He, our Creator's our best friend… Once you've lost that friend you've lost a lot of benefit and it's very hard to get through life without it" (female SRE teacher, #3 Muslim, New South Wales).
Understanding the value and meaning of life are also key to the essence of Buddhism. As one teacher explained: "the Buddha during his life said that we have to have the right understanding in this life to discover, to fully understand the law of nature is to live in harmony" (female SRE teacher, #4 Buddhist, New South Wales).
The Christian interviewees argued that the concept that there is a God who loves them and that Jesus loves them provided the students with meaning in life and a sense of hope. One Christian interviewee explained: "So that's a really key thing for me. I want these kids to find their sense of value and purpose and worth, in something outside themselves, so that when something goes wrong in life, it's not all about me. I'm not a total mess, because there is a God who loves me and who made me" (female SRE teacher, #5 Christian, New South Wales). Another elaborated further: "The focus of the faith that we teach, Christianity, is other person centred, a recognition of who God is, who we are, and how we relate to other people. Even if you choose to not follow that faith, many children benefit because they explore and are encouraged to consider others in all their decisions and how they live their lives" (female SRE teacher, #17 Christian, Queensland).
From an early age children can question the meaning of life and search for answers. One Baha'i teacher described how in a class she was taking of Years K-3, a Year 3 child put up their hand and asked: "What is the purpose of our life?" Another child then said: "I've been thinking about this for the last couple of years and I don't know." Then a Year One child put his hand up and said: "The purpose of our life is to be kind and to be loving and to behave like a Baha'i would" (female SRE teacher, #4 Baha'i, New South Wales). This response came from a six or seven-year old, whose parents wanted their child to be exposed to religious values even though they were not members of the Baha'i faith.
This story illustrates the key role that religion can play in developing key values, even in very young children. Thus, religious teachings can demonstrate that "there is an overarching worldview that tells us the reason why people are here… that they are all very valuable. Every particular person has potential and it's good to see them realise their potential" (female SRE teacher, #11 Christian, Victoria). As another teacher expressed it, "so for me I think it is a huge benefit. It helps them to understand why they are being educated [and that] even choosing a profession has a moral dimension to it" (female SRE teacher, #9 Buddhist, New South Wales).
Belief in God is also seen as providing meaning to life, and assisting the students' thinking positively about overcoming obstacles and difficulties. One interviewee drew on the biblical story of the twelve spies to demonstrate the importance of belief in God and understanding how to overcome challenges in life. She described how twelve spies entered Canaan. They all saw the same thing, but ten returned saying it would be impossible to conquer the land, which was inhabited by giants, and only two had faith in God, stressing that the obstacles could be overcome. She explained from this example that "So, in your life, it's the same thing… Can you overcome what you perceive to be obstacles; are they real obstacles that maybe you can still overcome? (female SRE teacher, #6 Jewish, New South Wales).
Thus, SRE/RI was seen as providing meaning in life through developing key values and belief in God.

Reinforcing Parental Values
A number of teachers also pointed out that the teaching of values in SRE was important because it correlated with what was being taught at home, and that this was a factor in parents opting into SRE classes. As one Christian SRE teacher noted: They are supporting it in their own culture and in their own home, and so the children are learning about that faith in the classroom, and they have got that connection back to their own culture and faith in the family… When their family is operating under those faiths and morals and values, and the children are also learning about that in school, it's congruent. They are learning to respect the faith, and the culture of their family. (female SRE teacher, #3 Christian, New South Wales) Another Christian RE teacher commented: I think we often forget that widely accepted values in western culture, and in Australia specifically, come from a Judeo-Christian heritage. And we make assumptions that values are just there and widely accepted when actually when students have an understanding of why those values came about and how those values came to be that it allows them to line up some assumed values that they may get from home with actually the foundation of those values. (male SRE teacher,#12 Christian,New South Wales) Similarly, Buddhist SRE can relate to their family culture: "That's the culture they inhabit. And they get their values and their lifestyle and all kinds of things from their family religion. And so it's an integrated thing" (female SRE teacher, #6 Buddhist, New South Wales).
Interviewees also commented that non-religious parents were also opting into SRE classes, often from one of the Eastern faiths, rather than Christianity, because they feel the messages these classes give in terms of values mirror their own values, and that they are conveyed within in framework of belief, unlike the ethics classes.
Thus, parents are opting into SRE/RI classes because they reinforce their values from home, whether because they are part of that faith community or because they are secular, but still wish their children to be exposed to values, which stem from faith traditions.

Discussion and Conclusions
This chapter has aimed to gain a better understanding of the ways teaching values in SRE/RI classes complements and strengthens values education in the secular curriculum in government school settings; to illuminate the differences of emphasis between the faith traditions; and the differences in the religious and secular approaches. The data gathered from the directors, teachers and graduate students sheds light on these issues, enabling a better understanding of the advantages of retaining SRE/RI in this post-modern world. As well, we shall discuss the specific advantages of SRE/RI in conveying key values.

SRE/RI Complements and Strengthens Secular Values Teaching
There is a general recognition of the need to include values education in the school curriculum but many postmodern scholars have either ignored or discounted the role religious education can play in values education in the postmodern world and have presented the issues completely through a secular lens (Shachar 2019;Maddox 2014;Crpić et al. 2009;Byrne 2009;Schwartz 1994), thereby taking a binary approach. Inglehart (1977) and Davies (2014) have argued that traditional religious values are declining significantly, but there is a strong debate about this conclusion in the current literature.
Various scholars, such asČrpić et al. (2009), who undertook an extensive empirical research project and concluded that "religion is still an attractive candidate as a system for cultural belonging and offers distinct lifestyle patterns including moral standards", have argued that religious education still has a role to play. This is highlighted by the Australian experience. Surveys show that currently in Australia only 60% of the population identify as religious, but in New South Wales 70% of parents are choosing to send their children to SRE/RI classes. According to the teachers' testimony, one reason behind this parental choice, both secular and religious, is because parents believe that values education can be best transmitted through religious education. Their evidence demonstrates that some parents who come from a Christian background may choose a different faith tradition for their children's SRE/RI classes, such as Buddhism or Baha'i, rather than Special Ethics Education in New South Wales or non-scripture, indicating that they still want a religious education, including religious values for their children.
This finding supports current international research findings that religiosity and values formation are interrelated (Käppler et al. 2011;Kay and Zeibertz 2006;Gross 2005). Researchers also argue that moral education, values education, ethics, virtues and morality is best taught through the medium of RE (Moran 1989;Stern 2018). Moran argues that "Moral education needs religious education neither as lord and servant but as thoughtful colleague" (Moran 1989, p. 189). Stern (2018) posits that values education and ethics enriches the RE curriculum and enables the development of student's virtues: "(t)he dispositions of pupils will be developed using the treasury of faith" (Birmingham City Council 2007, p. 5). He contends that in the United Kingdom values education is embedded into RE as it is expected that RE will "have a personal influence on pupils". Values education through RE builds the student's character from a more holistic approach, a point stressed by our interviewees. Thus, our findings add to this growing body of data that special religious education can complement and strengthen the values curriculum in the secular classrooms in the government school settings.

Differences of Emphasis Between the Faith Traditions
Comparing different understanding of values across the religions is a relatively new research field, which recognises that there is a need for an interdisciplinary approach to values education. Following Parker andFreathy (2011), Stern (2018) argues that each religious tradition "has its own hierarchy of virtues", for instance the importance of humility in the Christian tradition and Jewish traditions which is considered to be a core value and a basis for the establishment of the relationships between men and God (Stern 2018, p. 149). We also found that there were some differences in the understanding of values from the different faith traditions. There was a commonality in terms of the main values listed by the interviewees, even though there were differences in emphasis. For example, Hinduism and Buddhism explicitly included taking care of the environment as part of their students' responsibilities. Jewish SRE teachers used Jewish history to explain different values, with the Holocaust being used as an example of not being a bystander but rather standing up for the rights of others, particularly in relation to playground bullying. These different understandings actually strengthen the educative aspect of SRE giving it a broader scope and impact.

Differences in the Religious and Secular Approaches and Contributing Factors
Our study revealed that there was definitely significant overlap between the analysis of key values provided by the interviewees in this study and the federal government's list of nine key values to be fostered in the overall education curriculum, but there were also differences. In particular, there was less emphasis on Value 2: students "doing your best… and pursue excellence" because the focus in SRE/RI tends to be more within the sphere of social good, rather than individual educational attainment. Another important difference relates to Value 4: "freedom", in particular regarding enjoying one's rights. This was due to a greater emphasis on duties and responsibilities in SRE/RI classes. While one Hindu interviewee referred to "privileges" as part of the concept of dharma, this was within the framework of responsibilities, so that privileges emerge from duty. Again, the importance of standing up for the rights of others, as noted above, was stressed by a Jewish interviewee, but the concept was embedded in other responses from the different faith traditions. This reflects the difference between the individualism of postmodern society, as compared with the focus on community good within religious traditions. Understanding these differences relates to the issue of extrinsic and intrinsic values (Selman 2003;Beit-Hallahmi and Argyle 1997), where extrinsic values were found to be stronger in people who were religious. There is a tension between the attitude to the social values rather than to the values which are more self-centred on the individual. Even though the teachers think that adolescents tend to support more extrinsic rather than intrinsic values (Gross 2013), the prominent values that students endorse in the overall picture are intrinsic rather than extrinsic. Yet, this tension is an integral part of the pedagogical discourse in the SRE/RI arena and makes SRE more attractive to parents.
While Value 6: "integrity" was not referred to specifically, the concept was embedded in many of the examples given by the interviewees across the faiths. Thus, there was a slightly different emphasis and approach to the key values in the responses of the SRE/RI teachers and graduates. There is an even more substantial difference with Schwartz's (1994) list of ten values, with values such as self-directedness, stimulation and hedonism not even being hinted at. These differences reflect the findings of Klages (1988) that the auto-centric values characterise a modern approach, with its focus on individual self-realisation, whereas nomo-centric values characterise a more traditional approach with its focus on communal wellbeing and belonging. As such, the focus is much more on "terminal values" that will be relevant for the students' lifetime, rather than "instrumental values" (Rokeach 1973;Levy 1999).
Another key difference between that of the secular curriculum and that of SRE/RI is the belief in the importance of the role of a higher being and of traditional teachings in the values education. According to our interviewees there is something moral and ethical when a person preserves and obeys values which come from an extrinsic, heteronomic force, as opposed to the autonomous level where people act according to their personal moral understandings (Oser 1999). This approach is supported by research that has revealed the educational power of following religious precepts (Gross 2009), as well as the impact of prayer (Kohn 2020). This difference in focus was also revealed clearly in our study, so that not only was there a contrast in evaluating the importance of different values between the secular and religious approach but also in the form of transmitting these values to students.
The challenges young people face today, living in the virtual world of social media, what one interviewee described as "this pixel world", were also recognised and stressed. Thus, the focus on one's self and individuation can lead to nihilism (Lovat et al. 2002) because, if there is no higher framework, young people can believe that nothing matters. As well the focus on materialism and just leading the good life does not fulfil deeper needs, as will be discussed in the chapter on spirituality.

Developmental Stages
Some of the interviewees specifically discussed the changing understanding of values as students mature, moving from the heteronomous to the autonomous (Kohlberg 1973(Kohlberg , 1976Piaget 1932). They stressed that it was important to take account of this in SRE/RI pedagogy because, as students move into secondary school, they need to understand the rationality behind moral laws and values within their faith tradition. Whilst the existence of a higher spiritual being was very important, the threat of divine punishment was no longer sufficient to ensure that students absorbed and followed these laws. Hence parents and students are looking for a more reflective religious education which enables raising and responding to tough questions.

Advantages of Teaching and Learning Values
Through SRE/RI

Role of the Teacher in Values Education
From the teacher and graduate responses, the strong commitment of the SRE/RI teachers was very clear and a number commented that this commitment differentiated their approach and curriculum from the secular classroom, where values education was only an element of the secular curriculum and often gets lost. In their study, Lovat and Schofield (1998) found that not all the classroom teachers were supportive of the values education program. They found that, despite this lack of commitment, there was an improvement in student attitudes regarding the education segment of the values education program. Yet, the studies recognise the key role teachers play as role models and the SRE/RI teachers perceive their task in this domain as very important. As well, because they are teaching the values through the lens of their faith tradition, they are authentic in their approach. Authenticity has also been seen as an important component in values education (Forgasz 2002). These are important elements which SRE/RI classes contribute to values education in government schools, and to remove these classes would be a loss to teaching and learning about values.

Synergy Between Home, School and Community
Scholars have pointed to the central role the family plays in developing a child's values at the micro level (Bronfenbrenner 1979), and this can extend to the religious community, youth group and place of worship (Gross 2013;Waghid 2011). Our interviewees also recognised these factors and believed that SRE/RI classes can further extend these elements due to the synergy between home values and those of the respective faith traditions. According to the teachers from all the religious faiths, there is a synergy between the child's environment, the religious and moral aspirations of their parents and their demands from schools as is discussed in Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory (1979). In terms of values education, for many families, the values from their religion are of central importance. Hence, SRE/RI classes help to reinforce values education because this provides the added level of spiritual and religious understandings, which reinforces the connection between home and school. Even when parents are no longer practising in terms of attending religious services, the evidence reveals that they still want their children to learn the basic religious values that they grew up with, regardless of which faith tradition we are talking about. The graduate students' voice from those we interviewed strongly echoed their family background and in a number of cases these interviewees became SRE/RI teachers as they understood the importance of these classes and wished to maintain the tradition.
The importance of this synergy is also seen in the issue of parental choice, the maintenance of which is important because it enables the parents, the consumers (Bunar 2010), to match their home (parent) religious values within the framework of a government school (Passy 2005). Robert Selman (2003) perceives that the school environment, its values and approach is a direct product and reflection of parents' priorities. Again the existence of this alignment was a point raised by a number of our interviewees across the faiths. Parents are actively choosing SRE/RI for their children but are also specifying which faith tradition, which for parents from a Christian background is sometimes one of the Eastern religions rather than Christianity. However, the teachers believed that the parents were making this choice because teaching spiritual and religious values is seen as the core of these classes.
It seems that the a priori orientation (Gross 1995) of students who attend SRE/RI classes, and their parents who make this choice, is more spiritual and hence religious values are considered in a more favourable light. The fact that parents send their children to SRE/RI impacts on their tendency to endorse spiritual aspects and values. This is apparent in the eyes of the SRE/RI teachers in their discourse and educational spiritual priorities.
Drawing on the research of Skolverket (2011) in Sweden, Stern (2018) attests that "ethics education forms a distinct strand within RE in the national curriculum" (p. 138). This policy is enhanced in Sweden as an integral part to foster social cohesion in response to the large wave of immigration and increasing cross-border mobility. Hence "within RE ethics will include 'daily moral dilemmas' linked to different kinds of ethical reasoning… and ethical concepts" (Skolverket 2011, p. 180). Stern claims that "teaching ethics as part of RE means that ethics education can draw on the richness of religious as well as non-religious traditions" (p. 139). It also means that "ethics is assessed as part of RE" (Stern 2018, 140). These observations apply to the SRE/RI curricula in Australia, where attendance at these classes is voluntary, depending on parental choice, but they are clearly recognised as adding to the richness of their child's education by a majority of the parent body.

Values Education and Transformation
Whilst it is possible to teach about values, it is often more difficult to create a transformation in students' behaviour (Rossiter 2011), although such transformation may be considered as important within the educational literature (Lamm 2001). Our research demonstrates that the Buddhist teachers, in particular, were aware of this challenge and stressed the importance of their students practicing the key messages which they teach in order to transform their behaviour. This applied especially to skills in meditation which the students learn and are encouraged to practice during the week. However, it also applied to other aspects of student behaviour-as one of the teachers expressed it just as in a garden you can have weeds that you do not want, so students are encouraged to "work on their garden", on their spiritual behaviour, to ensure that "weeds", bad behaviour, do not appear. This allows for the possibility of transformation. Other religious faiths introduce similar approaches, but not always as explicitly. This is an area where more professional development could lead to a better understanding of the key concepts of values education, ensuring that the teaching and learning of values can have more of a long-term effect on the students.
Our study has demonstrated that the belief in a higher being and the role which traditional texts play in the various faith traditions are important for the development of values. This aligns with the criticism of the secularisation theory which has been enhanced by Hervieu-Léger (1998 who characterises the social significance of religion in the construction of the cultural background of Europe. Similarly Casanova (1994) has analysed the public sphere where, she argues, religion is still a major factor, and Davie (2000) has analysed the new social reality with increasing religious pluralism, again stressing the ongoing role of religion. Teachers believe that this is a factor in parental choice, with even non-religious parents, the "nones", choosing to send their children to SRE/RI classes. In this way there is a strong connection between values and beliefs, the search for meaning, spirituality and religious identity (Crawford and Rossiter 2006).
Our research supports international scholarship that religion is still an important educational resource in assisting to facilitate the transmission of values in contemporary society. As discussed earlier in the book, many scholars both in Australia and internationally argue that worldview education should replace religious education in the post-modern world (van der Kooij et al. 2017) and that religion is no longer relevant in the modern and post-modern world (Davies 2014). Yet, our findings in terms of values education indicate that special religious education is still an important factor in terms of children's socialisation and values education as indicated by parental choice of SRE/RI. This is an area that requires further research, since we did not interview parents of children attending SRE/RI classes.
The postmodern world has seen a break in the chain of tradition with the decrease and, in many cases the rejection, of traditional texts. This impacts not only on values education but also on religious identity as will be discussed in the next chapter.